Which is your strategy on dice sites?

[fox19891989]

I have a new idea: all in your small bet, and bet 2X, stop when you lose, continue betting when you win and bet with all your money, 5-10 times is a cycle.

Example: 1 CLAM, bet 2X, 10 times win in a row, your money will be 1*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2=1024 CLAM, but it is very risky, so just bet a little. To reduce risk, just bet less times like 3-5 times, if you win in a row, you money will increase very soon.

[fox19891989]

well there is no guarantee you win even in a game with 50% chance. i just lost over 20 times in a row right now with 49.9% chance to win!

Which site did u bet? Is it a scam? So you may win over 20 times in a row right with 49.9% chance to win!

[kassadin]

well there is no guarantee you win even in a game with 50% chance. i just lost over 20 times in a row right now with 49.9% chance to win!

Which site did u bet? Is it a scam? So you may win over 20 times in a row right with 49.9% chance to win!

i think they didnt consider house edge... i seen on pd people lose that many times like 14-17 times on worse streak.

[fox19891989]

my strategy in dice is simple, I call it reverse martingale system. Basically I will double my bets every time I win and decreasing it every round I lose.

Hi, dude, it is interesting, I guess you win a lot, any details about this strategy? Thanks.

[fox19891989]

my strategy in dice is simple, I call it reverse martingale system. Basically I will double my bets every time I win and decreasing it every round I lose.

Hi, dude, it is interesting, I guess you win a lot, any details about this strategy? Thanks.

[Omikifuse]

the best system ever is .......... Mr Luck

Or Mr Faucet

 Or Mr (you are lucky) 

or mr faucet + mr 9900x + mr bot

[shorena]

I currently play the "r3dsnow" (because I copied it from r3dsnow) and yes I am aware that this will some day cause me to lose it all, esp. if I keep playing on "no delay".

Base bet: 6 Satoshi
Chance to win: 15.81%
Multiplier: 6.262
increase on loss: +22.71%
increase on win: -
bankroll: 0.03

stats currently (inlcude other systems):

Code:

Bets:     158915
Wins:     39941
Losses:   118974
Wagered:  0.15254514
Profit:   0.00701806

[Sarahiko]

If your lucky to win some always make a withdrawal every time you hit big to compensate the amount you deposited if your planning to play a long run don`t ever use martingale that`s 99% fail

[Aemon]

I currently play the "r3dsnow" (because I copied it from r3dsnow) and yes I am aware that this will some day cause me to lose it all, esp. if I keep playing on "no delay".

Base bet: 6 Satoshi
Chance to win: 15.81%
Multiplier: 6.262
increase on loss: +22.71%
increase on win: -
bankroll: 0.03

stats currently (inlcude other systems):

Code:

Bets:     158915
Wins:     39941
Losses:   118974
Wagered:  0.15254514
Profit:   0.00701806

Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

[kennenman]

my strategy in dice is simple, I call it reverse martingale system. Basically I will double my bets every time I win and decreasing it every round I lose.

Hi, dude, it is interesting, I guess you win a lot, any details about this strategy? Thanks.

since your strategy works, and dice is simple to you care to screen cap your winnings?

[Aemon]

my strategy in dice is simple, I call it reverse martingale system. Basically I will double my bets every time I win and decreasing it every round I lose.

Hi, dude, it is interesting, I guess you win a lot, any details about this strategy? Thanks.

since your strategy works, and dice is simple to you care to screen cap your winnings?

I would love to see the pictures of your winnings.  This strategy works when you win more than you lose, but sine their is a house edge everywhere you go, I can't see how you would be winning more than you lose.  This would make you go broke really quick.

[leblanc]

i really doubt that the guys in a positive balance.. i never hear anyone gaining so much btc off that, and if so then i think everyone would be promoting it.

[michinzx]

I currently play the "r3dsnow" (because I copied it from r3dsnow) and yes I am aware that this will some day cause me to lose it all, esp. if I keep playing on "no delay".

Base bet: 6 Satoshi
Chance to win: 15.81%
Multiplier: 6.262
increase on loss: +22.71%
increase on win: -
bankroll: 0.03

stats currently (inlcude other systems):

Code:

Bets:     158915
Wins:     39941
Losses:   118974
Wagered:  0.15254514
Profit:   0.00701806

Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

that method works better than you think it would, i used to use a even lower win %, just ensure that you can take 100 loss streaks with your bank roll and you slowly profit

[Aemon]

I currently play the "r3dsnow" (because I copied it from r3dsnow) and yes I am aware that this will some day cause me to lose it all, esp. if I keep playing on "no delay".

Base bet: 6 Satoshi
Chance to win: 15.81%
Multiplier: 6.262
increase on loss: +22.71%
increase on win: -
bankroll: 0.03

stats currently (inlcude other systems):

Code:

Bets:     158915
Wins:     39941
Losses:   118974
Wagered:  0.15254514
Profit:   0.00701806

Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

that method works better than you think it would, i used to use a even lower win %, just ensure that you can take 100 loss streaks with your bank roll and you slowly profit

Yes, but what happens if you hit 105 losses?  You are broke for very little profit.  I mean you have better odds if you just YOLO at 85% than what you are doing.  You are essentially trying to win small amounts for a high chance of losing it all, and the more you play, the more likely you are to lose

[shorena]

-snip-
Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

that method works better than you think it would, i used to use a even lower win %, just ensure that you can take 100 loss streaks with your bank roll and you slowly profit

Yes, but what happens if you hit 105 losses?  You are broke for very little profit.  I mean you have better odds if you just YOLO at 85% than what you are doing.  You are essentially trying to win small amounts for a high chance of losing it all, and the more you play, the more likely you are to lose

Thats true for any gambling system. Thats usually the point to mitigate the loses until you no longer can and bust. You can only push the risk back to high losing streaks. Its the same for martingale. I had many martingale streaks (16 and more loses in a row) in the past, thus I dont like playing that any more.

With the "r3dsnow" a simulation of 31000 runs with 1 million rolls max (less if you bust ofc) resulted in 7345 profitable runs. The lowest positive profit beeing 120 satoshi (lol) the highest 127784842 Satoshi (1,27 BTC), the average (over all runs) 7619340 Satoshi and the median (over all runs) beeing -1999906.

Its only a simulation though and its not perfect yet. I currently use random numbers instead of the usual shaX(server_seed-client_seed-nounce).

On the server it is working out for me so far, but ofc you are correct this will one day bust.

Edit: (stats update, ~900 bets made since the last update)

Code:

Bets:     159810
Wins:      40064
Losses:   119746
Wagered:  0.15309492
Profit:   0.00714458

[Aemon]

-snip-
Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

that method works better than you think it would, i used to use a even lower win %, just ensure that you can take 100 loss streaks with your bank roll and you slowly profit

Yes, but what happens if you hit 105 losses?  You are broke for very little profit.  I mean you have better odds if you just YOLO at 85% than what you are doing.  You are essentially trying to win small amounts for a high chance of losing it all, and the more you play, the more likely you are to lose

Thats true for any gambling system. Thats usually the point to mitigate the loses until you no longer can and bust. You can only push the risk back to high losing streaks. Its the same for martingale. I had many martingale streaks (16 and more loses in a row) in the past, thus I dont like playing that any more.

With the "r3dsnow" a simulation of 31000 runs with 1 million rolls max (less if you bust ofc) resulted in 7345 profitable runs. The lowest positive profit beeing 120 satoshi (lol) the highest 127784842 Satoshi (1,27 BTC), the average (over all runs) 7619340 Satoshi and the median (over all runs) beeing -1999906.

Its only a simulation though and its not perfect yet. I currently use random numbers instead of the usual shaX(server_seed-client_seed-nounce).

On the server it is working out for me so far, but ofc you are correct this will one day bust.

Edit: (stats update, ~900 bets made since the last update)

Code:

Bets:     159810
Wins:      40064
Losses:   119746
Wagered:  0.15309492
Profit:   0.00714458

I understand what you are saying.  All I am telling you is classic Martingale is better than your strategy as far as more profit goes at a safer amount of risk.  You are still using Martingale, its just a modified version of it.  The more safe way to do Martingale is to use a higher win % and then a higher increase on loss, its just simple math.  You are using one of the worst versions of Martingale you can use.

[arvindr]

-snip-
Seems like rather a small profit for the high chance of loss you have.  I think standard Martingale would work a lot better for you

that method works better than you think it would, i used to use a even lower win %, just ensure that you can take 100 loss streaks with your bank roll and you slowly profit

Yes, but what happens if you hit 105 losses?  You are broke for very little profit.  I mean you have better odds if you just YOLO at 85% than what you are doing.  You are essentially trying to win small amounts for a high chance of losing it all, and the more you play, the more likely you are to lose

Thats true for any gambling system. Thats usually the point to mitigate the loses until you no longer can and bust. You can only push the risk back to high losing streaks. Its the same for martingale. I had many martingale streaks (16 and more loses in a row) in the past, thus I dont like playing that any more.

With the "r3dsnow" a simulation of 31000 runs with 1 million rolls max (less if you bust ofc) resulted in 7345 profitable runs. The lowest positive profit beeing 120 satoshi (lol) the highest 127784842 Satoshi (1,27 BTC), the average (over all runs) 7619340 Satoshi and the median (over all runs) beeing -1999906.

Its only a simulation though and its not perfect yet. I currently use random numbers instead of the usual shaX(server_seed-client_seed-nounce).

On the server it is working out for me so far, but ofc you are correct this will one day bust.

Edit: (stats update, ~900 bets made since the last update)

Code:

Bets:     159810
Wins:      40064
Losses:   119746
Wagered:  0.15309492
Profit:   0.00714458

I understand what you are saying.  All I am telling you is classic Martingale is better than your strategy as far as more profit goes at a safer amount of risk.  You are still using Martingale, its just a modified version of it.  The more safe way to do Martingale is to use a higher win % and then a higher increase on loss, its just simple math.  You are using one of the worst versions of Martingale you can use.

For a short run of profits , you could also try the martingale variation of betting x10.
Where you make a few dust bets and then start doubling after 5 losses at big value bets.

[shorena]

-snip-
I understand what you are saying.  All I am telling you is classic Martingale is better than your strategy as far as more profit goes at a safer amount of risk.  You are still using Martingale, its just a modified version of it.  The more safe way to do Martingale is to use a higher win % and then a higher increase on loss, its just simple math.  You are using one of the worst versions of Martingale you can use.

Make a suggestion that is botable and Ill give it a try tomorrow.

[leesin]

i recommend to pre-roll every time before you place any bet. unless you know a certain pattern but even then, its still a possible loss.

[leonaa]

i do 90% to recover a base bet, but I only do that a few times. Any time I do this more then 4 times its to let me know I dont know enough about the game.