Which is your strategy on dice sites?

[Astargath]

Martingale is bad idea
Better bet whole balance 3 times with 1.1x multiplier

Sure that sounds safe.

ouch shit baby , I have experienced similar things like bet on very very safe odds with big big money (1.3 BTC on me is big ) and lost it all . and now i realize it sucks also now i have rule on gamble that i shouldnt do yolo.

That's insane hard to believe someone would gamble that much.

And you think that is crazy? In real life casinos people have spent way more money in way more crazier ways, like the guy betting all his savings to a number or stuff like that, if you search on google you can find way crazier shit.

[dooglus]

This is just complete madness and what happened after that, did he kept coming to the site or was he never seen again? I always knew that gamblers who win/lose a lot are a little weird and they run on their emotions but this is by far the craziest thing I have ever seen.

(Mental note to self: Start investing in JD )

He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

[shanem]

Martingale is bad idea
Better bet whole balance 3 times with 1.1x multiplier

Sure that sounds safe.

ouch shit baby , I have experienced similar things like bet on very very safe odds with big big money (1.3 BTC on me is big ) and lost it all . and now i realize it sucks also now i have rule on gamble that i shouldnt do yolo.

That's insane hard to believe someone would gamble that much.

And you think that is crazy? In real life casinos people have spent way more money in way more crazier ways, like the guy betting all his savings to a number or stuff like that, if you search on google you can find way crazier shit.

I am not sure if this guy is real.
It seems fake.
Nobody would risk that much in a dice site.

[dooglus]

And you think that is crazy? In real life casinos people have spent way more money in way more crazier ways, like the guy betting all his savings to a number or stuff like that, if you search on google you can find way crazier shit.

I tried at the time to see how the bet compared to other big bets in history, couldn't find any decent sources.

I did find the "man bets life savings on roulette spin" story. Here, for instance: http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/12/roulette.win/

Ashley Revell, a 32-year-old man from London, England, sold everything he owned, even his clothes, to try his luck Sunday on one spin of a roulette wheel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

He put $135,300 on red, and with friends and family watching, the ball hit the mark, giving Revell $270,600

So that's a $135k bet. mech's bet was 7016 BTC when BTC was trading at around $133 each, so $933k. About 7 times bigger than the 'life savings' bet.

http://trilema.com/2015/bitbet-history/ talks about how:

Bitbet recently paid out on the largest bet in its history

with a footnote saying:

Notably, not in the history of Bitcoin, the Vandroiy-Pirateat40 10`000 BTC bet that nanotube escrowed will probably hold that title forever.
Of course, if you go by "equivalent dollar value" then ~5k @ 300 soundly beats 10k @ ~5 out of the field, and while a milion dollar + bet is significant even for Vegas, it's still not "the largest" as far as I know.

They're talking about this bet, in which 1121.15 BTC was lost, and 4393.47 BTC was bet on the winning side. However that isn't a single bet, it's the sum of all the bets on a single event, and it's also very likely that the majority of the bets on both sides were made by the same person (also the person who owns the site), hedging their own exposure.

Are you able to find anything bigger?

I am not sure if this guy is real.
It seems fake.
Nobody would risk that much in a dice site.

Yeah, it's hard to believe isn't it. I bankrolled the first half of his action then got scared and pulled out, so I didn't get any part of his big losing bet.

[Operatr]

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

[ironman80]

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I didnt...Anyway,congratz on your success...I hope you will have more luck in the future...I will try your strategy

[Superhitech]

A good strategy would to be invest in the dice site, since the house usually wins in the end.

Some reputable dice sites to invest in would be:

Dadice.com
Just-dice.com (CLAMS)
btcdemon.com

[Astargath]

And you think that is crazy? In real life casinos people have spent way more money in way more crazier ways, like the guy betting all his savings to a number or stuff like that, if you search on google you can find way crazier shit.

I tried at the time to see how the bet compared to other big bets in history, couldn't find any decent sources.

I did find the "man bets life savings on roulette spin" story. Here, for instance: http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/12/roulette.win/

Ashley Revell, a 32-year-old man from London, England, sold everything he owned, even his clothes, to try his luck Sunday on one spin of a roulette wheel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

He put $135,300 on red, and with friends and family watching, the ball hit the mark, giving Revell $270,600

So that's a $135k bet. mech's bet was 7016 BTC when BTC was trading at around $133 each, so $933k. About 7 times bigger than the 'life savings' bet.

http://trilema.com/2015/bitbet-history/ talks about how:

Bitbet recently paid out on the largest bet in its history

with a footnote saying:

Notably, not in the history of Bitcoin, the Vandroiy-Pirateat40 10`000 BTC bet that nanotube escrowed will probably hold that title forever.
Of course, if you go by "equivalent dollar value" then ~5k @ 300 soundly beats 10k @ ~5 out of the field, and while a milion dollar + bet is significant even for Vegas, it's still not "the largest" as far as I know.

They're talking about this bet, in which 1121.15 BTC was lost, and 4393.47 BTC was bet on the winning side. However that isn't a single bet, it's the sum of all the bets on a single event, and it's also very likely that the majority of the bets on both sides were made by the same person (also the person who owns the site), hedging their own exposure.

Are you able to find anything bigger?

I am not sure if this guy is real.
It seems fake.
Nobody would risk that much in a dice site.

Yeah, it's hard to believe isn't it. I bankrolled the first half of his action then got scared and pulled out, so I didn't get any part of his big losing bet.

I searched a little and i did find something: ''Harry Kakavas lost $1.5 Billon in 14 months'' If you search on google you can find different sources talking about him and his addiction problem. He was obviously incredibly rich so i dont know how much it affected him but still 1.5 billion is way too much.

[twister]

-snip-
He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

Sounds good, will start from a little amount and see how it goes before investing anything big and ofcourse I have to stop myself from rolling a little. 

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I have tried that strategy long back, it fails sooner or later. Maybe it did worked for you this time but don't try it again, you made a good profit, just enjoy it.

[Operatr]

-snip-
He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

Sounds good, will start from a little amount and see how it goes before investing anything big and ofcourse I have to stop myself from rolling a little. 

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I have tried that strategy long back, it fails sooner or later. Maybe it did worked for you this time but don't try it again, you made a good profit, just enjoy it.

No just this time. It has worked for me like 'n' number of times. Only thing is that I can't stop myself
My records are :-
Bitdice :- 0.05 to 1.4 BTC and cashed out
             0.27 to 0.64 BTC and Cashed Out
              0.06 to 1 BTC and lost
             0.2 BTC to 1.2 BTC and cashed out
              and many small ones..
Just-Dice :- 30 clams to 80 clams and lost
                 70 clams to 300 clams, cashed out 80, lost remaining.
PrimeDice :- 0.05 to 0.2 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.7 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.8 and then lost
I used Primedice long time back and no more use it. I use BitDice a lot. Come there and ask about me Am Popular There

[twister]

-snip-
He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

Sounds good, will start from a little amount and see how it goes before investing anything big and ofcourse I have to stop myself from rolling a little. 

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I have tried that strategy long back, it fails sooner or later. Maybe it did worked for you this time but don't try it again, you made a good profit, just enjoy it.

No just this time. It has worked for me like 'n' number of times. Only thing is that I can't stop myself
My records are :-
Bitdice :- 0.05 to 1.4 BTC and cashed out
             0.27 to 0.64 BTC and Cashed Out
              0.06 to 1 BTC and lost
             0.2 BTC to 1.2 BTC and cashed out
              and many small ones..
Just-Dice :- 30 clams to 80 clams and lost
                 70 clams to 300 clams, cashed out 80, lost remaining.
PrimeDice :- 0.05 to 0.2 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.7 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.8 and then lost
I used Primedice long time back and no more use it. I use BitDice a lot. Come there and ask about me Am Popular There

Wow, that's impressive. It never worked for me but seems to be working well for you. I don't go to Bitdice, so I'll take your word for it. And it's all good dude, nice to see someone is winning at dice. 

[kotwica666]

A good strategy would to be invest in the dice site, since the house usually wins in the end.

Some reputable dice sites to invest in would be:

Dadice.com
Just-dice.com (CLAMS)
btcdemon.com

1. On what basis you say that these sites are trustworthy?

2. So for example Multidice.me or pocketdice.io are not trustworthy?

just wondering...

[Operatr]

-snip-
He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

Sounds good, will start from a little amount and see how it goes before investing anything big and ofcourse I have to stop myself from rolling a little. 

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I have tried that strategy long back, it fails sooner or later. Maybe it did worked for you this time but don't try it again, you made a good profit, just enjoy it.

No just this time. It has worked for me like 'n' number of times. Only thing is that I can't stop myself
My records are :-
Bitdice :- 0.05 to 1.4 BTC and cashed out
             0.27 to 0.64 BTC and Cashed Out
              0.06 to 1 BTC and lost
             0.2 BTC to 1.2 BTC and cashed out
              and many small ones..
Just-Dice :- 30 clams to 80 clams and lost
                 70 clams to 300 clams, cashed out 80, lost remaining.
PrimeDice :- 0.05 to 0.2 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.7 cashed out
                  0.2 to 0.8 and then lost
I used Primedice long time back and no more use it. I use BitDice a lot. Come there and ask about me Am Popular There

Wow, that's impressive. It never worked for me but seems to be working well for you. I don't go to Bitdice, so I'll take your word for it. And it's all good dude, nice to see someone is winning at dice. 

Yes I have been quite lucky but for 72% you need some good amount of bankroll and need to start low and make risk bets at times.
I would remind again, if you use 72%, you shall make a target and withdraw once reached as you would most probably lose if you get greedy.

PS:- The funny part is, I have never bought bitcoins

[Astargath]

A good strategy would to be invest in the dice site, since the house usually wins in the end.

Some reputable dice sites to invest in would be:

Dadice.com
Just-dice.com (CLAMS)
btcdemon.com

1. On what basis you say that these sites are trustworthy?

2. So for example Multidice.me or pocketdice.io are not trustworthy?

just wondering...

Because just-dice for example, and its the only one i trust from those 3 sites, is the most trusted dice site. If you dont trust dooglus you might aswell not trust anyone, he had thousands of btc, literally and he didnt run away with them so there is no point in stealing now so yea.

The others i wouldnt trust them so much, dadice is fairly new and the other kind of the same.

[GannickusX]

-snip-
He came back a few months later and sold his account for a few BTC. As I already said, he had made some losses bankrolling the site, which meant his account would not be due to pay any commission on bankroll profits for quite a while, which made his account worth something.

He didn't say very much, but it was good to hear that he was still around months later.

JD uses CLAM now. If you put coins into the bankroll the site will stake them for you (CLAM is proof of stake) and give you 90% of the staking reward, in addition to any profits or losses the site makes from players betting. It turns out that the staking rewards are bigger than the gambling wins and losses and so JD is mostly just a CLAM staking pool these days.

Sounds good, will start from a little amount and see how it goes before investing anything big and ofcourse I have to stop myself from rolling a little. 

Has anyone else tried my strategy?
I play at 72% and whenever I lose a bet, I increase the bet to 4x and on win, back to base bet.
I have raised 0.05 to 1.4 BTC with this strategy. Only thing you need to learn is when to stop and need to take some risk bets in the course of betting.
Anyone else has tried this?

I have tried that strategy long back, it fails sooner or later. Maybe it did worked for you this time but don't try it again, you made a good profit, just enjoy it.

Hmm because there are strategies that work in the short term, and there are better strategies for short term, in the end they all end up the same but in the first bets you can indeed have better strategies than others

[dooglus]

Ashley Revell, a 32-year-old man from London, England, sold everything he owned, even his clothes, to try his luck Sunday on one spin of a roulette wheel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

He put $135,300 on red, and with friends and family watching, the ball hit the mark, giving Revell $270,600

So that's a $135k bet. mech's bet was 7016 BTC when BTC was trading at around $133 each, so $933k. About 7 times bigger than the 'life savings' bet.

I searched a little and i did find something: ''Harry Kakavas lost $1.5 Billon in 14 months'' If you search on google you can find different sources talking about him and his addiction problem. He was obviously incredibly rich so i dont know how much it affected him but still 1.5 billion is way too much.

Thanks for the pointer. I searched and found this...

https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2010/january/1274319037/paul-barry/biggest-loser :

In 14 months from June 2005 Kakavas slapped down almost $1.5 billion on the baccarat tables at Crown Casino in Melbourne – betting $300,000 a hand – and lost more than $30 million.

So $300k per hand, or about 3 times smaller than the 7k BTC bet was worth at the time. I'm looking for large individual bets.

[Astargath]

Ashley Revell, a 32-year-old man from London, England, sold everything he owned, even his clothes, to try his luck Sunday on one spin of a roulette wheel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

He put $135,300 on red, and with friends and family watching, the ball hit the mark, giving Revell $270,600

So that's a $135k bet. mech's bet was 7016 BTC when BTC was trading at around $133 each, so $933k. About 7 times bigger than the 'life savings' bet.

I searched a little and i did find something: ''Harry Kakavas lost $1.5 Billon in 14 months'' If you search on google you can find different sources talking about him and his addiction problem. He was obviously incredibly rich so i dont know how much it affected him but still 1.5 billion is way too much.

Thanks for the pointer. I searched and found this...

https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2010/january/1274319037/paul-barry/biggest-loser :

In 14 months from June 2005 Kakavas slapped down almost $1.5 billion on the baccarat tables at Crown Casino in Melbourne – betting $300,000 a hand – and lost more than $30 million.

So $300k per hand, or about 3 times smaller than the 7k BTC bet was worth at the time. I'm looking for large individual bets.

Yep i saw that too after posting it and searched a little bit more and didnt find single hand bets much bigger than that but im not sure how much money real life casinos allow in a single bet, im pretty sure most of them wont allow that much right? Because if you bet 1 million on a single number on roulette you would win 36.000.000 million dollars (im not sure if its x36) so they would have to limit that.

But still 1.5 billion is crazy

[Docnaster]

Just follow your gut, and win alot of money but becareful on betting huge amount there will be always 60% of losing

[crwth]

Ashley Revell, a 32-year-old man from London, England, sold everything he owned, even his clothes, to try his luck Sunday on one spin of a roulette wheel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

He put $135,300 on red, and with friends and family watching, the ball hit the mark, giving Revell $270,600

So that's a $135k bet. mech's bet was 7016 BTC when BTC was trading at around $133 each, so $933k. About 7 times bigger than the 'life savings' bet.

I searched a little and i did find something: ''Harry Kakavas lost $1.5 Billon in 14 months'' If you search on google you can find different sources talking about him and his addiction problem. He was obviously incredibly rich so i dont know how much it affected him but still 1.5 billion is way too much.

Thanks for the pointer. I searched and found this...

https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2010/january/1274319037/paul-barry/biggest-loser :

In 14 months from June 2005 Kakavas slapped down almost $1.5 billion on the baccarat tables at Crown Casino in Melbourne – betting $300,000 a hand – and lost more than $30 million.

So $300k per hand, or about 3 times smaller than the 7k BTC bet was worth at the time. I'm looking for large individual bets.

Yep i saw that too after posting it and searched a little bit more and didnt find single hand bets much bigger than that but im not sure how much money real life casinos allow in a single bet, im pretty sure most of them wont allow that much right? Because if you bet 1 million on a single number on roulette you would win 36.000.000 million dollars (im not sure if its x36) so they would have to limit that.

But still 1.5 billion is crazy

I just managed to see this old thread and learned a lot. From those people betting in enormous amounts (that only rich people can do). Betting with those amounts are just individuals who are really addicted. They just have money to burn, or probably that's all they have. The thought of winning and positivity, it's what makes it sadder. You could lose there.

[FlightyPouch]

Just follow your gut, and win alot of money but becareful on betting huge amount there will be always 60% of losing

You must be really really be careful, I had played a lot of dice games and I do really reach an amount of Bitcoins to withdraw but I didnt. I did still play and hope to win, but in the end i did have a 32 losses straight that gave me a backlash because that happened to me for that first time, it is really shocking tough.