bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2012, 03:33:09 AM |
|
So there are at least a few people here running multiple models that they pick and choose to trade based on, whether using computers or elliot wave theory. Do the events of earlier today put you at a disadvantage?
It seems to me every time one of these technical difficulties occurs the market becomes "wary" and kind of resets, negating recent info that has been included in the models.
I'm just interested to know how people deal with that situation.
|
|
|
|
mollison
|
|
June 24, 2012, 03:37:39 AM |
|
Do the events of earlier today put you at a disadvantage?
You are referring to the unintentional halt in trading at Gox?
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2012, 03:38:31 AM |
|
Do the events of earlier today put you at a disadvantage?
You are referring to the unintentional halt in trading at Gox? Yes, sorry.
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2012, 05:32:26 AM |
|
I think they are recalibrating right now...
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2012, 06:19:54 AM Last edit: June 24, 2012, 06:40:22 AM by bitcoinbitcoin113 |
|
The data from the trading glitch has actually produced some extra divergence in my models—half a percent or so. But I don't like to throw out data, it will take me a little bit to find a way to work it out.
Thank you for your acknowledgement. I am 12 and appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Spekulatius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2012, 05:47:48 PM |
|
The data from the trading glitch has actually produced some extra divergence in my models—half a percent or so. But I don't like to throw out data, it will take me a little bit to find a way to work it out.
Thank you for your acknowledgement. I am 12 (years old?) and appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 24, 2012, 08:36:35 PM |
|
The data from the trading glitch has actually produced some extra divergence in my models—half a percent or so. But I don't like to throw out data, it will take me a little bit to find a way to work it out.
Thank you for your acknowledgement. I am 12 (years old?) and appreciate it. It just means I'm new at it.
|
|
|
|
Raize
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015
|
|
June 26, 2012, 02:21:23 AM Last edit: June 26, 2012, 02:34:39 AM by Raize |
|
I want to learn about Kurtosis risk! Explain it like I am 5...
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2012, 02:27:57 AM |
|
I want to learn about Kurtosis risk! Explain it like I am 5... Its the risk someone will smack you in the back of the head when you least expect it and you'll bite that tongue off.
|
|
|
|
|
bb113 (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2012, 02:54:40 AM |
|
Haha I was just answering your question.
|
|
|
|
TraderTimm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
|
|
July 03, 2012, 07:46:43 AM |
|
Black-Scholes and the assumption of a (normal) gaussian distribution in determining option pricing is one of the major flaws that blew up LTCM. The 'mean' should be thicker than the 'tails', and most price action disagrees. The number of two to three sigma events fall outside of the 'predicted' distribution, which means of course any assumptions based on that model are doomed to tail-risk of large magnitudes.
BTC is probably a more 'sane' market that anything out in the traded exchanges, if only by virtue of not having a crapload of sub-pennying front-running High-Frequency Trading algorithms dominating volume like the ES futures or the major Index stocks.
|
fortitudinem multis - catenum regit omnia
|
|
|
|