Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 11:50:59 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Low efficiency issue.  (Read 1214 times)
Lectoid
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1


View Profile
May 19, 2011, 08:30:02 PM
 #1

Newb here, but I've done some reading. I have already started pricing AMD cards . I tried a google search for my issues below, but got nothing. And this site says I can't use the search function here. So I apologize if the solution has been posted.

I started with the poclbm-mod then shortly after saw that phoenix was supposedly better. I have an older Nvidia 9600 GSO 512 card that phoenix seems to get about 9.75Mh/s (poclbm-mod gets about 6.5). When I was running poclbm using:

poclbm-mod.exe -v -w 128 --user=user --pass=pass -d 0 -o site.com -p 8332

my DOS screen was full of "long poll: new block".

When I switch to phoenix using:
phoenix.exe -u http://user:pass@site.com:8334/ -k poclbm AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128 -v

I mostly get a lot of "New block (workqueue) and "server gave new work; passing to workqueue".
Code:
[19/05/2011 16:20:47] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:20:57] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:21:08] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:21:18] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:21:29] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:21:40] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:21:50] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:01] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:11] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:22] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:32] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:42] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:53] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:22:53] New block (WorkQueue)
[19/05/2011 16:22:53] Currently on block: 125148
[19/05/2011 16:22:54] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:05] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:16] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:27] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:37] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:48] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:23:59] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:24:10] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[19/05/2011 16:24:12] Result 000000000cb2f5ba... accepted
[8.76 Mhash/sec] [20 Accepted] [7 Rejected] [RPC]
Also the occasional result accepted and a few rejected.

I've adjusted settings and can't seem to make a difference. I am not expecting faster Mhash/sec. My issue is efficiency. Is there something I can do to increase that? I was banned from bitcoinpool because of crappy efficiency. Now I am using slush pool or whatever because they don't ban for low efficiency. On bitcoinpool's forums, they would tell me it should be better, but not how to make it better.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481284259
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284259

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284259
Reply with quote  #2

1481284259
Report to moderator
1481284259
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481284259

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481284259
Reply with quote  #2

1481284259
Report to moderator
compro01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 485


View Profile
May 23, 2011, 06:42:22 AM
 #2

are you overclocking that card by chance?  that's an awful lot of rejected shares.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!