Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2024, 06:35:13 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Rand Paul Votes NO on GMO Warning Labels  (Read 2264 times)
Bitware (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 926
Merit: 1001


weaving spiders come not here


View Profile
June 25, 2012, 04:38:44 PM
 #1

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00161#position

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:SP2310:
compro01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 590
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 02:27:55 PM
 #2

Of course he voted against it.

How can the market work in his "libertarian" proponents' favor if people have the information to make a free market function.
Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
June 26, 2012, 04:43:29 PM
 #3

The change in the U.S. labeling laws really bothers me.  I can't believe this is the game they want to play to prevent people from knowing what they consume.

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
MoonShadow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1010



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 04:49:44 PM
 #4

Do you really think that more labelling regulations are going to change anything?

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
caveden
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 04:55:13 PM
 #5

If I understand it correctly, it is a federal law to allow states to force producers to put a particular label on their products in some cases.
Any consistent libertarian has to be against forcing people to do things they don't want to do with their property. Rand Paul's vote is as expected.
Explodicle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 950
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 05:25:13 PM
 #6

Has anyone here ever tried non-GMO corn? I've only eaten corn that is the result of centuries of selective breeding, far removed from anything unmodified.
cmg5461
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 05:33:46 PM
 #7

Has anyone here ever tried non-GMO corn? I've only eaten corn that is the result of centuries of selective breeding, far removed from anything unmodified.

and apples..

If I've helped: 1CmguJhwW4sbtSMFsyaafikJ8jhYS61quz

Sold: 5850 to lepenguin. Quick, easy and trustworthy.
Realpra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 815
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 26, 2012, 06:21:04 PM
 #8

I have little opinion on labels... I forgive Ron Paul whether right or wrong on this.

Funny it's even an issue next to Obama's evil.

Cheap and sexy Bitcoin card/hardware wallet, buy here:
http://BlochsTech.com
cmg5461
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 06:25:14 PM
 #9

I have little opinion on labels... I forgive Ron Paul whether right or wrong on this.

Funny it's even an issue next to Obama's evil.

Rand Paul <> Ron Paul

If I've helped: 1CmguJhwW4sbtSMFsyaafikJ8jhYS61quz

Sold: 5850 to lepenguin. Quick, easy and trustworthy.
jwzguy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1002



View Profile
June 26, 2012, 06:32:48 PM
 #10

He's completely right to do so.

bb113
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 02:20:54 PM
 #11

Of course he voted against it.

How can the market work in his "libertarian" proponents' favor if people have the information to make a free market function.

Whats stopping you from informing yourself now? Also, for example beer labels don't even need to tell me the alcohol content, and food labels are missing all sorts of info they should have to be truly informative. Usually if I am worried about it I look it up anyway. How much of that food does the FDA actually test anyway? While I like having that info, it seems that government enforcement of them is just kind of a wasteful and feel-good measure. If someone put a label and it was later found to be incorrect that should be fraud though.
asdf
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 27, 2012, 10:51:03 PM
 #12

Of course he voted against it.

How can the market work in his "libertarian" proponents' favor if people have the information to make a free market function.

If people want their food products certified in a certain way and are willing to pay what it costs then the market will provide this service. These laws are both redundant and an infringement on property rights. This is Ron Paul's perspective and I totally agree with his vote.
Hawker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 28, 2012, 05:39:24 PM
 #13

Of course he voted against it.

How can the market work in his "libertarian" proponents' favor if people have the information to make a free market function.

If people want their food products certified in a certain way and are willing to pay what it costs then the market will provide this service. These laws are both redundant and an infringement on property rights. This is Ron Paul's perspective and I totally agree with his vote.

Sorry that's doing it backwards.  If you are being sold something, you deserve to be told what's in it.  You are free not to read it, but that is your choice.  If the product does not have facts that you need to know on the packaging, you never get the chance to make that choice.  
Explodicle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 950
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 28, 2012, 09:48:44 PM
 #14

If the product does not have facts that you need to know on the packaging, you never get the chance to make that choice.  

The only fact the packaging absolutely needs is a unique identifying number like a PLU or UPC code. Then the internet can solve any remaining information shortages. We could even streamline the process with a smartphone app...

*scan*
[pause]

==WARNINGS==
Non-Kosher
Non-Halal
Contains meat
Made in a factory that processes tree nuts
GMO
Comment by ChargersFan123: "these things are disgusting! fail!" (2 responses)
Comment by Joints420: "whatevs, i liked it but it did make me throw up i think"

Tap an entry to see additional information.
Buy carrots now! Tap here to get a better deal on carrots!
myrkul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2012, 10:07:47 PM
 #15

If the product does not have facts that you need to know on the packaging, you never get the chance to make that choice. 

The only fact the packaging absolutely needs is a unique identifying number like a PLU or UPC code. Then the internet can solve any remaining information shortages. We could even streamline the process with a smartphone app...

*scan*
[pause]

Great idea, but...

Quote
==WARNINGS==
Non-Kosher
Non-Halal
Contains meat
Made in a factory that processes tree nuts
GMO
Comment by ChargersFan123: "these things are disgusting! fail!" (2 responses)
Comment by Joints420: "whatevs, i liked it but it did make me throw up i think"

Tap an entry to see additional information.
Buy carrots now! Tap here to get a better deal on carrots!

What the hell are these things!?!?!? Vat-grown pork rinds or something? Wink

BTC1MYRkuLv4XPBa6bGnYAronz55grPAGcxja
Need Dispute resolution? Public Key ID: 0x11D341CF
No person has the right to initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against another person or their property. VIM VI REPELLERE LICET
AndrewBUD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 502



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2012, 10:11:16 PM
 #16

What about all the bugs that are "allowed" to be on or in certain foods....


We eat a lot of thrips and maggots Sad


▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄▄█████▀▀''`▀▀█████▄▄
▄███P'            `YY██▄
▄██P'                  `Y██▄
███'                      `███
███'                         ███
▄██'   ▄█████▄▄  ,▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄p   ███
▄██▀  ,████▀P▀███.`██████████P   ▀██▄
███[ ,████ __. ███.   ,▄████▀    ███
███[ ]████████████[  ▄████▀       ███
███[ `████   ,oo2 ▄████▀'       ,███
▀██▄  `████▄▄█████d███████████   ▄██▀
▀██.   `▀▀▀▀▀▀"  Y▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ,██▀
███.                        ,███
▀██▄                      ▄██▀
▀███▄_                 ,███▀
▀███▄▄_          _▄▄███▀
▀▀████▄▄ooo▄▄█████▀
▀▀███████▀▀'

365

TM

EZ365 is a digital ecosystem that combines
the best aspects of online gaming, cryptocurrency
trading
and blockchain education. ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

..WHITEPAPER..    ..INVESTOR PITCH..

.Telegram     Twitter   Facebook

                       .'M████▀▀██  ██
                      W█Ws'V██  ██▄▄███▀▀█
                     i█████m.~M████▀▀██  ███
                     d███████Ws'V██  ██████
                     ****M██████m.~███f~~__mW█
          ██▀▀▀████████=  Y██▀▀██W ,gm███████
      g█████▄▄▄██   █A~`_WW Y█  ██!,████████
   g▀▀▀███   ████▀▀`_m████i!████P W███  ██
 _███▄▄▄██▀▀▀███Af`_m███   █W ███A ]███  ██
__ ~~~▀▀▀▀▄▄▄█*f_m██████   ██i!██!i███████
Y█████▄▄▄▄__. i██▀▀▀██████████ █!,██████
 8█  █▀▀█████.!██   ██████████i! █████
 '█  █  █   █W M█▄▄▄██████   ██ !██
  !███▄▄█   ██i'██████████   ██
   Y███████████.]██████████████
   █   ███████b ███   ██████
   Y   █   █▀▀█i!██   ████
    V███   █  █W Y█████
      ~~▀███▄▄▄█['███
            ~~*██

Play

            │
    │      ███
    │      ███
    │      ███
    │   │  ███
   ███  │  ███
   ███ ███ ███
 │  ███ ███ ███
███ ███ ███ ███
███ ███  │   │
███ ███  │   │
 │   │
 │

Trade

           __▄▄████▄▄
     __▄▄███████████████▄▄▄
 _▄▄█████████▀▀~`,▄████████████▄▄▄
 ~▀▀████▀▀~`,_▄▄███████████████▀▀▀
   d█~  =▀███████████████▀▀
   ]█! m▄▄ '~▀▀▀████▀▀~~ ,_▄▄
  ,W█. *████▄▄__ '  __▄▄█████
  !██P  █████████████████████
   W█. - ██████████████████▀
  i██[   ~ ▀▀█████████▀▀▀
 g███!
Y███

Learn
[/tabl
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1004



View Profile WWW
June 29, 2012, 02:09:27 AM
 #17

Has anyone here ever tried non-GMO corn? I've only eaten corn that is the result of centuries of selective breeding, far removed from anything unmodified.

GMO does not equal selective breeding. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism

Right now 85% of corn is GMO, so it is most of it, but 17 years ago almost no corn was GMO.  If you had corn before then, it was non GMO.  I can not taste the difference but usually taste is not going to be the problem.

http://www.naturalnews.com/035734_GMOs_foods_dangers.html

cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
June 29, 2012, 02:24:24 AM
 #18

They already cross pig DNA with produce, how long before they cross people DNA with soy lentils?  Cheesy

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
Hawker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 29, 2012, 08:34:53 AM
 #19

If the product does not have facts that you need to know on the packaging, you never get the chance to make that choice.  

The only fact the packaging absolutely needs is a unique identifying number like a PLU or UPC code. Then the internet can solve any remaining information shortages. We could even streamline the process with a smartphone app...
...snip...

The important thing is that the buyer has access to information that meets a common standard and that is accurate.  Once that is there, if there is a market for smartphone apps, great. 
caveden
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004



View Profile
June 29, 2012, 08:58:23 AM
 #20

If you are being sold something, you deserve to be told what's in it.

I agree you "deserve", but you don't get to force the seller to tell if he doesn't want to. Just don't trust him and don't buy from him if you find it suspicious.
I believe the law in question was about forcing a label. The simple fact that some people want to force others to put a particular label on their products is already suspicious too.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!