WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested

[dr1980m]

rio is %130 maybe in a few hours
its imposible.. No one can't earn much this
this is not a ponzi, this is a dangerously ponzi

[1715547611]

1715547611

[cypher21]

rio is %130 maybe in a few hours
its imposible.. No one can't earn much this
this is not a ponzi, this is a dangerously ponzi

its far away from that. imagine, cryptodouble need 4 days. here i get my money back 4 times. in one day.

[Chillance]

This is just pure awesomeness! I just tested with 0.01... let's see how that goes. I love the openness and that OP payed back that 6.5 BTC.

Can't do this with fiat...

Also, why does this end on Wednesday/Thursdays.. Not Sundays?

[jacktheking]

This is just pure awesomeness! I just tested with 0.01... let's see how that goes. I love the openness and that OP payed back that 6.5 BTC.

Can't do this with fiat...

Also, why does this end on Wednesday/Thursdays.. Not Sundays?

Not surr but.. I think.. having sunday in the middle will spark more investors.

[marcotheminer]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

[wwwabcd]

I do not understand. What happens if we are the last?
We will lose all our money?
You will get 5% of all deposits in the end week or 5% of every deposit during the week?

[arieq]

This is just pure awesomeness! I just tested with 0.01... let's see how that goes. I love the openness and that OP payed back that 6.5 BTC.

Can't do this with fiat...

Also, why does this end on Wednesday/Thursdays.. Not Sundays?

Round 1 ends on thursday, jan 15th 11.59 PM and the second round will start right away on friday, jan 16th 00:00 GMT

There's still plenty of time for round 1

[truth_]

Woke up to some sweet payments.  Time to keep this ball rolling!

[jacktheking]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

[Risky2]

Guys anounce this in cryptodouble's thread, it already collapsed. All those desperate people will flock here (i sure did).

[marcotheminer]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round, the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

[WeeklyPonziV3]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

[marcotheminer]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

Your word does not give you an obligation that you must follow. Lying isn't a hard thing to do and breaking your word isn't either. Many sites (eg dice.ninja, dicebitco.in and everydice) had 'given their word' to their users that they would never scam for the exact reason you give too; they would make more money in fees in the long run. However, quick cash satisfies scammers more than making consistent yet small returns over the long run.

Currently, no one should/will trust you. Dooglus has managed a site for well over a year, during which he was the sole controller of 60,000BTC (investors' funds).

[WeeklyPonziV3]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

Your word is not an obligation by which you must follow. Lying isn't a hard thing to do and breaking your word isn't either. Many sites (eg dice.ninja, dicebitco.in and everydice) had 'given their word' to their users that they would never scam for the exact reason you give too; they would make more money in fees in the long run. However, quick cash satisfies scammers more than making consistent yet small returns over the long run.

Currently, no one should/will trust you. Dooglus has managed a site for well over a year, during which he was the sole controller of 60,000BTC (investors' funds).

Cool. Let me run my site, will you? You're entitled to your own opinion, feel free to broadcast it elsewhere.

[marcotheminer]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

Your word is not an obligation by which you must follow. Lying isn't a hard thing to do and breaking your word isn't either. Many sites (eg dice.ninja, dicebitco.in and everydice) had 'given their word' to their users that they would never scam for the exact reason you give too; they would make more money in fees in the long run. However, quick cash satisfies scammers more than making consistent yet small returns over the long run.

Currently, no one should/will trust you. Dooglus has managed a site for well over a year, during which he was the sole controller of 60,000BTC (investors' funds).

Cool. Let me run my site, will you? You're entitled to your own opinion, feel free to broadcast it elsewhere.

I don't think there is much I can do to 'stop' your site. Even if I somehow closed the site down, you (and your countless alts) would more than likely create and pump a new site within hours.

I will be broadcasting my own opinion wherever I please thank you very much. You have the possibility to harvest this idea (a ponzi simulation gambling game) into a useable and profitable product, yet you seem to be oblivious to the fact that you will have to prove to others' that it is truly fair, safe and secure.

Beware of sending any funds to weeklyponzi.

[WeeklyPonziV3]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

Your word is not an obligation by which you must follow. Lying isn't a hard thing to do and breaking your word isn't either. Many sites (eg dice.ninja, dicebitco.in and everydice) had 'given their word' to their users that they would never scam for the exact reason you give too; they would make more money in fees in the long run. However, quick cash satisfies scammers more than making consistent yet small returns over the long run.

Currently, no one should/will trust you. Dooglus has managed a site for well over a year, during which he was the sole controller of 60,000BTC (investors' funds).

Cool. Let me run my site, will you? You're entitled to your own opinion, feel free to broadcast it elsewhere.

I don't think there is much I can do to 'stop' your site. Even if I somehow closed the site down, you (and your countless alts) would more than likely create and pump a new site within hours.

I will be broadcasting my own opinion wherever I please thank you very much. You have the possibility to harvest this idea (a ponzi simulation gambling game) into a useable and profitable product, yet you seem to be oblivious to the fact that you will have to prove to others' that it is truly fair, safe and secure.

Beware of sending any funds to weeklyponzi.

So the way I prove it's fair is by sending all MY user's funds to a 3rd party for reasons unknown? Makes perfect sense. So ~650 BTC deposited is the result of people waiting to see if it's truly fair, safe and secure? My users are more than happy at the moment, I don't need someone not even involved in the website, and with obviously little understandings of the workings of the site, trying to micro-manage my site.

Thanks,

[marcotheminer]

This is a nice concept of a gambling game (not really a scam per-se as long as the game goes according to the rules). However, the owner could be cheating by depositing first. The owner is raking in the fees too (39btc earned so far wow).

The only thing that would make it better would be having the funds held by a reputable member (eg dooglus), so that the site doesn't have the incentive to run with deposits.

Hmm.. but to BTC was sent automatically usig a software. There is no need for someone to hold a wallet.

Next round the owner could switch off the automatic payment (deposits would continue rolling in, possibly 150+btc). Then the owner runs off with all the deposits.

So having someone very trustworthy you would control the wallet and the automatic payout software (it would have to be inspected to make sure it's safe), would be ideal. I doubt this will happen though, even though it would add so much more credibility to a game that could end up very regularly used.

I would not do that. Besides from it being very dishonest, I would make more money in fees in the long run. Also, I don't trust anyone - not even this "dooglus" guy.

Your word is not an obligation by which you must follow. Lying isn't a hard thing to do and breaking your word isn't either. Many sites (eg dice.ninja, dicebitco.in and everydice) had 'given their word' to their users that they would never scam for the exact reason you give too; they would make more money in fees in the long run. However, quick cash satisfies scammers more than making consistent yet small returns over the long run.

Currently, no one should/will trust you. Dooglus has managed a site for well over a year, during which he was the sole controller of 60,000BTC (investors' funds).

Cool. Let me run my site, will you? You're entitled to your own opinion, feel free to broadcast it elsewhere.

I don't think there is much I can do to 'stop' your site. Even if I somehow closed the site down, you (and your countless alts) would more than likely create and pump a new site within hours.

I will be broadcasting my own opinion wherever I please thank you very much. You have the possibility to harvest this idea (a ponzi simulation gambling game) into a useable and profitable product, yet you seem to be oblivious to the fact that you will have to prove to others' that it is truly fair, safe and secure.

Beware of sending any funds to weeklyponzi.

So the way I prove it's fair is by sending all MY user's funds to a 3rd party for reasons unknown? Makes perfect sense. So ~650 BTC deposited is the result of people waiting to see if it's truly fair, safe and secure? My users are more than happy at the moment, I don't need someone not even involved in the website, and with obviously little understandings of the workings of the site, trying to micro-manage my site.

Thanks,

The way you prove it is by sending the 'users' (most possibly yourself) funds to a much more reputable person who has established themselves countless times over (countless times more than you) in the bitcoin ecosphere.

The reasons aren't unknown, they are to avoid users being hit hard by of trusting you with their deposits, which at any time you can run off with (your word of "I'm not going to do it" isn't enough to prove you won't).

Beware of sending any funds to weeklyponzi.

[mreza9980]

hi admin,i am new to your site,migrated from cryptodouble
I deposited .28 ,and then the payout session was over

the number for BTC Required Until Next Payout changed

so it means that round of the btc was over

but i still didnt recieved my payout
https://blockchain.info/tx/62b60997ae5189005d595bcf72879b6f99728f40a8cd06a417700c86cfdf2c98



do we have to wait for payouts,
are the payouts monthly or hourly

[optiman]

hi admin,i am new to your site,migrated from cryptodouble
I deposited .28 ,and then the payout session was over

the number for BTC Required Until Next Payout changed

so it means that round of the btc was over

but i still didnt recieved my payout
https://blockchain.info/tx/62b60997ae5189005d595bcf72879b6f99728f40a8cd06a417700c86cfdf2c98




do we have to wait for payouts,
are the payouts monthly or hourly

Your in line mate, the bitcoin needed for next payout pays the next person in line. im waiting 5-6hours now for my btc to come in, but i got in early yesterday and took good profits in very few hours

[Mitchell]

Beware of sending any funds to weeklyponzi.

It's a Ponzi! Of course you need to be keep that in mind. People have been saying that since the thread was created. No need to repeat them.