Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 03:37:34 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Request to have michaeladair removed from BadBears trust list  (Read 4422 times)
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 01:58:22 PM
 #41

Anyone on the default could give their alts positive trust, but if they did and it was found out (which wouldn't be that difficult especially in Quickseller's case) they likely would be removed. It also doesn't matter how long someone has been here but how trustworthy they are with their ratings. If it's abused by them they'll be removed so it's in their interests to keep their feedbacks accurate.

Damn right.

Also "I support ponzi schemes until they stop paying" is an absurd statement any way you slice it. If this guy isn't involved in at least one of them I will eat my hat

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
1512963454
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512963454

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512963454
Reply with quote  #2

1512963454
Report to moderator
1512963454
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512963454

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512963454
Reply with quote  #2

1512963454
Report to moderator
1512963454
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512963454

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512963454
Reply with quote  #2

1512963454
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
MadZ
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 01:58:27 PM
 #42

Oh yeah, most definitely. In fact promote him to admin. Isn't it obvious?

And while we're on the same topic, you better feed me with some positive trust. Or else... you're gonna get it...
Point made. Thanks Smiley

You better give me positive trust right now else I'm going to kill your dog.

Please delete this post and dont threadjack I'd like badbear to see my latest post.

Just PM him if you want him to remove you from his trust list, I doubt he will deny your request.

I want him to see that whole post because quickseller is claiming that I am an alt of those accounts and I'm not (check my trust for reference)

His feedback says you're either an alt or an associate of Plutonium & co. I'm not sure if you're the same person, there isn't conclusive evidence here, but there is good reason to think you were involved in his operations. You made many posts promoting his scheme and left him positive feedback. You also offered to get Plutonium to remove the negative trust he left me, which I'm not sure why you would have done if you didn't have some sort of relationship with him:
O shit, he negged you? Want me to try and get him to remove it?

You should have known you were staking your reputation by endorsing his scam.

I messaged him and convinced him because it wasnt right then he gave you negative trust. Also, I'm not involved or an alt of the bitcoinstocks ponzi, I only supported it because it kept paying me out. I didn't support it when it stopped sending.

Please post that PM here and report it to an admin so they can verify its legitimacy. I believe Quickseller would agree with me that this would be sufficient proof that you are not his alt.
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:05:52 PM
 #43

Oh yeah, most definitely. In fact promote him to admin. Isn't it obvious?

And while we're on the same topic, you better feed me with some positive trust. Or else... you're gonna get it...
Point made. Thanks Smiley

You better give me positive trust right now else I'm going to kill your dog.

Please delete this post and dont threadjack I'd like badbear to see my latest post.

Just PM him if you want him to remove you from his trust list, I doubt he will deny your request.

I want him to see that whole post because quickseller is claiming that I am an alt of those accounts and I'm not (check my trust for reference)

His feedback says you're either an alt or an associate of Plutonium & co. I'm not sure if you're the same person, there isn't conclusive evidence here, but there is good reason to think you were involved in his operations. You made many posts promoting his scheme and left him positive feedback. You also offered to get Plutonium to remove the negative trust he left me, which I'm not sure why you would have done if you didn't have some sort of relationship with him:
O shit, he negged you? Want me to try and get him to remove it?

You should have known you were staking your reputation by endorsing his scam.

I messaged him and convinced him because it wasnt right then he gave you negative trust. Also, I'm not involved or an alt of the bitcoinstocks ponzi, I only supported it because it kept paying me out. I didn't support it when it stopped sending.

Please post that PM here and report it to an admin so they can verify its legitimacy. I believe Quickseller would agree with me that this would be sufficient proof that you are not his alt.

I deleted it a long while ago because I didn't want everyone to think that just because I persuaded him that I was in cahoots with him.

michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:07:04 PM
 #44

Anyone on the default could give their alts positive trust, but if they did and it was found out (which wouldn't be that difficult especially in Quickseller's case) they likely would be removed. It also doesn't matter how long someone has been here but how trustworthy they are with their ratings. If it's abused by them they'll be removed so it's in their interests to keep their feedbacks accurate.

Damn right.

Also "I support ponzi schemes until they stop paying" is an absurd statement any way you slice it. If this guy isn't involved in at least one of them I will eat my hat

It was an hyip. I don't support ponzi schemes, just the games based on ponzis...

peligro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 596


1NoBanksLuJPXf8Sc831fPqjrRpkQPKkEA


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:08:26 PM
 #45

I deleted it a long while ago because I didn't want everyone to think that just because I persuaded him that I was in cahoots with him.

It can be verified by BadBear if you want. Send him a PM.

█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
..BREAKOUT COIN ..
  M U L T I C U R R E N C Y   S M A R T   C O N T R A C T S   +   S I D E C H A I N S
★     B I T C O I N T A L K   T H R E A D     |     W E B S I T E     |     T W I T T E R     |     G I T H U B     ★
.
█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:10:20 PM
 #46

I deleted it a long while ago because I didn't want everyone to think that just because I persuaded him that I was in cahoots with him.

It can be verified by BadBear if you want. Send him a PM.

Already sent him a pm about 4 hours ago so he would check this out.

BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:16:30 PM
 #47

Anyone on the default could give their alts positive trust, but if they did and it was found out (which wouldn't be that difficult especially in Quickseller's case) they likely would be removed. It also doesn't matter how long someone has been here but how trustworthy they are with their ratings. If it's abused by them they'll be removed so it's in their interests to keep their feedbacks accurate.

Damn right.

Also "I support ponzi schemes until they stop paying" is an absurd statement any way you slice it. If this guy isn't involved in at least one of them I will eat my hat

It was an hyip. I don't support ponzi schemes, just the games based on ponzis...

I was tempted to turn this into a meme and be done with it. But I'd like you to explain this semantic shuffle. Is ponzi game like assault dance?

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:19:14 PM
 #48

Anyone on the default could give their alts positive trust, but if they did and it was found out (which wouldn't be that difficult especially in Quickseller's case) they likely would be removed. It also doesn't matter how long someone has been here but how trustworthy they are with their ratings. If it's abused by them they'll be removed so it's in their interests to keep their feedbacks accurate.

Damn right.

Also "I support ponzi schemes until they stop paying" is an absurd statement any way you slice it. If this guy isn't involved in at least one of them I will eat my hat

It was an hyip. I don't support ponzi schemes, just the games based on ponzis...

I was tempted to turn this into a meme and be done with it. But I'd like you to explain this semantic shuffle. Is ponzi game like assault dance?
Ponzi games involve people gambling on the chance that someone else will send money after them. I support the ones that clearly state the consequences and the risks involved in sending money.

BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:33:34 PM
 #49

Anyone on the default could give their alts positive trust, but if they did and it was found out (which wouldn't be that difficult especially in Quickseller's case) they likely would be removed. It also doesn't matter how long someone has been here but how trustworthy they are with their ratings. If it's abused by them they'll be removed so it's in their interests to keep their feedbacks accurate.

Damn right.

Also "I support ponzi schemes until they stop paying" is an absurd statement any way you slice it. If this guy isn't involved in at least one of them I will eat my hat

It was an hyip. I don't support ponzi schemes, just the games based on ponzis...

I was tempted to turn this into a meme and be done with it. But I'd like you to explain this semantic shuffle. Is ponzi game like assault dance?
Ponzi games involve people gambling on the chance that someone else will send money after them. I support the ones that clearly state the consequences and the risks involved in sending money.

via Imgflip Meme Maker


...and blackmail

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:42:34 PM
 #50


*Insert dumb meme here*

Ponzi Schemes don't fucking say that they are Ponzis... Go to this thread here and try and prove the people that believe me wrong. These games show that there is a risk in what they are doing unlike Ponzi Schemes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927206.0

BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:45:04 PM
 #51


*Insert dumb meme here*

Ponzi Schemes don't fucking say that they are Ponzis... Go to this thread here and try and prove the people that believe me wrong. These games show that there is a risk in what they are doing unlike Ponzi Schemes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927206.0

Is this the blackmail thread then?

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:50:00 PM
 #52


*Insert dumb meme here*

Ponzi Schemes don't fucking say that they are Ponzis... Go to this thread here and try and prove the people that believe me wrong. These games show that there is a risk in what they are doing unlike Ponzi Schemes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927206.0

Is this the blackmail thread then?

It's thread in which I and many others prove that negative trust is not necessary for Ponzi Game sites.

And I already said that I want to be off the Default Trust list.

BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078



View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:55:31 PM
 #53


*Insert dumb meme here*

Ponzi Schemes don't fucking say that they are Ponzis... Go to this thread here and try and prove the people that believe me wrong. These games show that there is a risk in what they are doing unlike Ponzi Schemes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927206.0

Is this the blackmail thread then?

It's thread in which I and many others prove that negative trust is not necessary for Ponzi Game sites.

And I already said that I want to be off the Default Trust list.

I read the thread. A ponzi is a game when it's called a ponzi. Very clever. We should move all the threads to the beginners and help section. Newbies love 'games' Roll Eyes

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:56:47 PM
 #54


*Insert dumb meme here*

Ponzi Schemes don't fucking say that they are Ponzis... Go to this thread here and try and prove the people that believe me wrong. These games show that there is a risk in what they are doing unlike Ponzi Schemes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=927206.0

Is this the blackmail thread then?

It's thread in which I and many others prove that negative trust is not necessary for Ponzi Game sites.

And I already said that I want to be off the Default Trust list.

I read the thread. A ponzi is a game when it's called a ponzi. Very clever. We should move all the threads to the beginners and help section. Newbies love 'games' Roll Eyes
Clearly you didn't understand it because you are too Blind.

michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 05:25:30 PM
 #55

I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)

Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260

#PathOfTotality


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 05:33:18 PM
 #56

Oh yeah, most definitely. In fact promote him to admin. Isn't it obvious?

And while we're on the same topic, you better feed me with some positive trust. Or else... you're gonna get it...
Point made. Thanks Smiley

You better give me positive trust right now else I'm going to kill your dog.

Please delete this post and dont threadjack I'd like badbear to see my latest post.

Just PM him if you want him to remove you from his trust list, I doubt he will deny your request.

I want him to see that whole post because quickseller is claiming that I am an alt of those accounts and I'm not (check my trust for reference)

His feedback says you're either an alt or an associate of Plutonium & co. I'm not sure if you're the same person, there isn't conclusive evidence here, but there is good reason to think you were involved in his operations. You made many posts promoting his scheme and left him positive feedback. You also offered to get Plutonium to remove the negative trust he left me, which I'm not sure why you would have done if you didn't have some sort of relationship with him:
O shit, he negged you? Want me to try and get him to remove it?

You should have known you were staking your reputation by endorsing his scam.

I messaged him and convinced him because it wasnt right then he gave you negative trust. Also, I'm not involved or an alt of the bitcoinstocks ponzi, I only supported it because it kept paying me out. I didn't support it when it stopped sending.

Please post that PM here and report it to an admin so they can verify its legitimacy. I believe Quickseller would agree with me that this would be sufficient proof that you are not his alt.
Correct. Or really even any PM with him (at least 2 weeks old) that is backed up by previous posts made by you about your communication with you.

Even if you can show you were not an alt/associate of any of them the best case scenario would be that I edit my rating to show you are only an extortionist

BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 06:20:22 PM
 #57

I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)

In general, I'm not going to get involved with these sorts of accusations of alts/sockpuppets. If I'm not going to confirm such accusations, then it's a bad idea to deny them as well. In cases where I do not deny them, people would see it as effectively a confirmation, when there are other reasons I may not want to confirm such allegations. You'll also end up in situations where people will just start throwing a bunch of accusations out to see what sticks.  

Besides, I can't state with any authority whether x is not y, only thing I can do is state whether there is evidence they are (and see previous statement for why I won't disclose that). Lack of such evidence doesn't mean they aren't.

There are lots of bad reasons to start doing this sort of thing, in the end I've decided it's best to just stay out of it, as an admin anyway. This doesn't mean I won't take actions regarding my personal trust list.

1Kz25jm6pjNTaz8bFezEYUeBYfEtpjuKRG | PGP: B5797C4F

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 06:24:42 PM
 #58

I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)

In general, I'm not going to get involved with these sorts of accusations of alts/sockpuppets. If I'm not going to confirm such accusations, then it's a bad idea to deny them as well. In cases where I do not deny them, people would see it as effectively a confirmation, when there are other reasons I may not want to confirm such allegations. You'll also end up in situations where people will just start throwing a bunch of accusations out to see what sticks.  

Besides, I can't state with any authority whether x is not y, only thing I can do is state whether there is evidence they are (and see previous statement for why I won't disclose that). Lack of such evidence doesn't mean they aren't.

There are lots of bad reasons to start doing this sort of thing, in the end I've decided it's best to just stay out of it, as an admin anyway. This doesn't mean I won't take actions regarding my personal trust list.

Is it not possible to check the ips that logged into to the alts and my account?

I know you are against doing it as an admin, but I don't want to be marked with this false negative trust...

Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260

#PathOfTotality


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 06:30:23 PM
 #59

I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)

In general, I'm not going to get involved with these sorts of accusations of alts/sockpuppets. If I'm not going to confirm such accusations, then it's a bad idea to deny them as well. In cases where I do not deny them, people would see it as effectively a confirmation, when there are other reasons I may not want to confirm such allegations. You'll also end up in situations where people will just start throwing a bunch of accusations out to see what sticks. 

Besides, I can't state with any authority whether x is not y, only thing I can do is state whether there is evidence they are (and see previous statement for why I won't disclose that). Lack of such evidence doesn't mean they aren't.

There are lots of bad reasons to start doing this sort of thing, in the end I've decided it's best to just stay out of it, as an admin anyway. This doesn't mean I won't take actions regarding my personal trust list.

Is it not possible to check the ips that logged into to the alts and my account?

I know you are against doing it as an admin, but I don't want to be marked with this false negative trust...

Like I said above even if it were shown that you are not an alt of the people claimed to be you I would only edit the negative to reflect you being an extortionist, which I think is the worse of the claims. Like MadZ said, my feedback says you are either an alt or an associate (e.g. in the same scamming ring) of them. Like I said, I would accept you publishing a single PM to/from Plutonium as proof you are not one and the same.

EDIT: updated to only reflect you are an extortionist.
Moreia's will likely remain however I am willing to hear his argument as to why it should be removed/edited

EDIT2: I updated it back to that I believe that you are an alt/partner of the people who I believe you to be partners with since you are trying to take out loans without collateral in a scammy way

michaeladair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


I'm a Web Developer: HTML, CSS, PHP, JS.


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 06:32:42 PM
 #60

I'm out of the default trust now, I'm gonna work with badbear and sort out the claim made against me that i use all those alts. (See my trust for the list that quickseller made)

In general, I'm not going to get involved with these sorts of accusations of alts/sockpuppets. If I'm not going to confirm such accusations, then it's a bad idea to deny them as well. In cases where I do not deny them, people would see it as effectively a confirmation, when there are other reasons I may not want to confirm such allegations. You'll also end up in situations where people will just start throwing a bunch of accusations out to see what sticks. 

Besides, I can't state with any authority whether x is not y, only thing I can do is state whether there is evidence they are (and see previous statement for why I won't disclose that). Lack of such evidence doesn't mean they aren't.

There are lots of bad reasons to start doing this sort of thing, in the end I've decided it's best to just stay out of it, as an admin anyway. This doesn't mean I won't take actions regarding my personal trust list.

Is it not possible to check the ips that logged into to the alts and my account?

I know you are against doing it as an admin, but I don't want to be marked with this false negative trust...

Like I said above even if it were shown that you are not an alt of the people claimed to be you I would only edit the negative to reflect you being an extortionist, which I think is the worse of the claims. Like MadZ said, my feedback says you are either an alt or an associate (e.g. in the same scamming ring) of them. Like I said, I would accept you publishing a single PM to/from Plutonium as proof you are not one and the same.

I really don't care if I am labeled as an EXTORTIONIST, that is basically what I did to you and I realize that. I just do not want to be falsely accused of something that I did not do.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!