The OP doesn't have a point, he's lashing out in what be believes is a similar manner to what I did right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=930649.0The OP is being a vindictive child and is to be treated (and rated) as such. This is to serve as a warning to others, as well as a reminder of his own inadequacy.
I would not say that being a "child" is a reason to label them as a scammer. He has his right to make any claims that he wishes. If his claims are invalid then they will be ignored.
I do think he does have a point as paul revere's claims played no small part in the bashing of woodcollector.
OP's rating of me:
"Expects us to believe that Woodcolleter is a fraud after WC paid me $1,000 usd worth of bitcoin to protect his clients because he is such an honorable business person."
Yes, I expect people to believe WC is a fraud, EVEN THOUGH he paid you a thousand dollars to delete a post on this forum.
You realize that thousand dollars you accepted was taken under false pretenses from one of his victims, yes?
If the OP gave you a "bad" rating then no one will take it seriously. The OP is not on the default trust list so his claim is not going to affect you. Your claim/rating is going to be visible to everyone who looks at his profile by default. What you are doing by leaving him negative trust is to silence your critics
Yep thats it. Its like bringing a plumber and putting him on the stand in a court case and calling him an expert witness to testify to medical knowledge. This whole damn thing is a witch hunt, and i and the others are not standing for it anymore !!!
