|
swissmate
|
 |
July 17, 2012, 01:11:55 PM |
|
What the...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
|
July 18, 2012, 04:14:32 AM |
|
My test result is actually more libertarian than I thought.  |
|
|
|
Dr. Glamorian
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2012, 06:32:51 AM |
|
Monarchist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
neptop
|
|
July 18, 2012, 11:57:31 AM |
|
Libertarian and on the whole economical axis, cause I guess it doesn't depend so much on how you implement economy... or at least there could be a number of ways to make it work depending on the specifics of the society. In other words. I think a functional society could probably work with anarcho-communism just as well as anarcho-capitalism. All it really requires is people thinking for themselves.
|
BitCoin address: 1E25UJEbifEejpYh117APmjYSXdLiJUCAZ
|
|
|
Bjork
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 457
Merit: 250
Look for the bear necessities!!
|
|
July 24, 2012, 10:58:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
July 24, 2012, 11:20:18 PM |
|
Most telling, is this:  Clearly, Obama is the lesser of two evils, but he's still pretty frigging evil. Especially when compared to his position last election:  And for comparison, here are the candidates from last election (the only place I was able to find Dr. Paul's position:  Given his past consistency, it's reasonable to assume he hasn't shifted much in the intervening 4 years. |
|
|
|
|
nimda
|
|
July 24, 2012, 11:41:02 PM |
|
Some of those questions are really not relevant.
Yeah, I don't see how my stance on gay marriage affects economics or how authoritarian I'm not. Also, this: Shows how far up and right the middle has shifted  What was once radically right is now unspeakably left. |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
July 24, 2012, 11:48:50 PM |
|
Some of those questions are really not relevant.
Yeah, I don't see how my stance on gay marriage affects economics or how authoritarian I'm not. Doesn't affect economics at all, but it does affect how authoritarian you are. No gay marriage: +authoritarian. But it is kinda sad how same the political parties' positions are. |
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031
RIP Mommy
|
|
July 24, 2012, 11:53:48 PM |
|
I'm apparently whatever my debate opponents say I am, since they like putting words in my mouth. LOL
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
dree12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
|
|
July 25, 2012, 12:50:27 AM |
|
Call me far, far left ideoligcally (off the chart). In theory, I don't believe in property at all (everything is the property of Earth and everyone should be able to use it without restraint). Also, I'm pretty far down as well. Practically (i.e., what I believe is the best possible), I'm here:  |
|
|
|
|
|
asdf
|
|
July 25, 2012, 10:38:21 PM |
|
How do you prefer to apply the violence of the state
|
|
|
|
|
|
LoupGaroux
|
|
July 25, 2012, 11:09:28 PM |
|
Some of those questions are really not relevant.
Yeah, I don't see how my stance on gay marriage affects economics or how authoritarian I'm not. Also, this: Shows how far up and right the middle has shifted What was once radically right is now unspeakably left. I notice with enormous glee that I am dead on matched with Ron Paul on the chart. Which I hope is slightly to the right of Ghenghis Khan. |
|
|
|
|
|
Explodicle
|
|
July 25, 2012, 11:32:52 PM |
|
The test puts me here:  But the test kept asking irrelevant questions. I really think I'm here:  Apologies for not editing an image, I'm using a smartphone. |
|
|
|
|
|
neptop
|
|
August 01, 2012, 01:15:05 PM |
|
Even though I think this tests has some "flaws", because in most cases people might be like "depends on details", especially when you start to actually think (as in philosophy) about them. Here is my result:  |
BitCoin address: 1E25UJEbifEejpYh117APmjYSXdLiJUCAZ
|
|
|
|
neptop
|
|
August 01, 2012, 01:30:14 PM |
|
Doesn't affect economics at all, but it does affect how authoritarian you are. No gay marriage: +authoritarian.
But it is kinda sad how same the political parties' positions are.
Which is also a bit funny. A gay person, who really badly wants to marry can't be very authoritarian? What if he is the dictator and says like "uhm, I hereby forbid heterosexual couples to marry". Extreme example, but there are numerous homosexuals (no offense!) leading authoritarian parties, even if there was no outing, so... |
BitCoin address: 1E25UJEbifEejpYh117APmjYSXdLiJUCAZ
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 01, 2012, 01:44:25 PM |
|
Doesn't affect economics at all, but it does affect how authoritarian you are. No gay marriage: +authoritarian.
But it is kinda sad how same the political parties' positions are.
Which is also a bit funny. A gay person, who really badly wants to marry can't be very authoritarian? What if he is the dictator and says like "uhm, I hereby forbid heterosexual couples to marry". Extreme example, but there are numerous homosexuals (no offense!) leading authoritarian parties, even if there was no outing, so... Well, that's a good point, but the test doesn't ask you if you would like to forbid hetero marriages in favor of gay marriages, nor (if I recall correctly) does it give you the option to get government out of marriages altogether. |
|
|
|
|
