-I didn't say we should ignore shorts. I said that in the current numbers they do not influence the price as much as inca is trying to show, at least not in the larger picture. Especially considering that longs are a lot more (and he is ignoring them while always talking about the shorts).
I paraphrased. And again with your busted ass logic. You don't know the ratio comprising the outstanding USD swaps so you cannot know how influential one or the other is. You're sitting there making fun of bulltards for making assumptions and then back that up with your own assumptions as if somehow yours are better than theirs.
-I said that I seriously doubt any significant portion of those USD swaps are used for LTC, considering how much little money is on the LTC swaps.
So your assumptions and doubts overrule the assumptions and doubts of others. Got it.
I never thought I would read that.
And I never thought someone who's so dedicated to trolling that they created a
named account for it would be so terrible at it.
If the chart I posted is not "crashing for months and months" I don't know what to say to you.
Is "severe and ridiculously scary downtrend" better to you? Is this what we are doing? Discussing about definitions of what "crashing" means?
No, it's not. Further, selectively sizing/croping a picture in attempt to bolster your argument is a pretty amateur way to try and validate your statement.
