Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 08:49:22 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: deleted  (Read 13025 times)
BitcoinEXpress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1239



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:29:17 AM
 #1

deleted
1480927762
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927762

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927762
Reply with quote  #2

1480927762
Report to moderator
1480927762
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927762

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927762
Reply with quote  #2

1480927762
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480927762
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927762

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927762
Reply with quote  #2

1480927762
Report to moderator
1480927762
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927762

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927762
Reply with quote  #2

1480927762
Report to moderator
1480927762
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927762

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927762
Reply with quote  #2

1480927762
Report to moderator
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540


Drama Junkie


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:31:56 AM
 #2

Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?  Smiley

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they keep laughing, then they start choking on their laughter, and then they go and catch their breath. Then they start laughing even more.
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:32:45 AM
 #3

It's not altchains without the drama.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
LoupGaroux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:37:17 AM
 #4

Old proverb... when the elephants start to get frisky, the ants get the fuck out of Denver. Looks like anywhere but downtown LTCville is the place to be for the next several days. I expect a nice refreshing drop in the difficulty level once this has all sorted itself, and the pools will gulp down the resultant flood of hashes on the new thread.

The more things change the more they stay the same... now Rapist is the sock-puppet of choice to attack BTCX (although I remember when she was just our darling little BCX, without the pesky "T"). And yes, obviously she is pretty... if you know anything at all about California Girls, well, if you don't know your ignorance shall be your bliss.

54Gh/s bASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices
Pre-Order Yours Today!     
Only $1069.99 ! @ http://www.BitcoinASIC.com


Look^^ I'm selling my soul too!
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:39:00 AM
 #5


k9quaint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:40:23 AM
 #6

I'd do Cameron Diaz.

Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
LoupGaroux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:43:47 AM
 #7

I'd do Cameron Diaz.

You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21.

54Gh/s bASIC Bitcoin Mining Devices
Pre-Order Yours Today!     
Only $1069.99 ! @ http://www.BitcoinASIC.com


Look^^ I'm selling my soul too!
Litecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:47:57 AM
 #8

Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?  Smiley

Awwwww thanks

Definitely a girl. Good looking too I guess.
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:48:09 AM
 #9

I'd do Cameron Diaz.

Id eat her sandwiches any day.

 Smiley

Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:49:12 AM
 #10

Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?  Smiley

There are no girls on the internet.

 Grin Grin Grin

dizzy1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:51:17 AM
 #11

Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:54:42 AM
 #12

Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.

The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin  did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.  Smiley


crosby
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366


#RIP freemoney


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:56:48 AM
 #13

quick question: why ?

Get your BTC and LTC at www.betcoinpartners.com/c/2/374 with FREEROLLS + Daily & Weekly Bonuses + Satellites + ON DEMAND tournaments + Instant Deposit + Instant Withdrawals + RING games + GTD Tournament + On Demand Satellite, + LIVE DEALER CASINO + SPORTSBOOK + 100% WELCOME BONUS www.betcoinpartners.com/c/2/374  150 btc ($100,000) gtd monthly, 75 btc ($50,000) gtd weekly and 10 BIG daily gtd ranging 0.5 btc to up to 20 btc
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 01:59:16 AM
 #14

It will be ironic if litecoin gets taken down and solidcoin is still going.

 Grin Grin Grin

VelvetLeaf
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 01:59:50 AM
 #15

Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.

The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin  did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.  Smiley



Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ?

BTC : 1GN81dxzxyFPQsyAtdocXr5S9Mcg4wcfFG
LTC : LgmYvXsYXc4xdjsMKXJWqtagxVvioK6iaw
FC : 6dpSnKMtttUUYzaRu1EB7Lu18PBRVHU3V7
k9quaint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 02:00:02 AM
 #16

I'd do Cameron Diaz.

You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21.

A Cameron Diaz pity lay is my hedge against the Mayan Apocalypse. I'll come out ahead either way.

Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
Simran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700



View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 02:01:51 AM
 #17

How is none of this illegal  Huh

*Image Removed*
Donate LTC: LRgbgTa3XNQSEUhnwC6Ye2vjiCV2CNRpib
Donate BTC: 1AGP6xPTRvsAVhsRsBX13NUH6p6LJjyeiA
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 02:03:35 AM
 #18

Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.

The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin  did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.  Smiley



Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ?
You need to trust the lead developer which defeats the purpose of cryptocurrency in the first place.

Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700


Wat


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2012, 02:05:19 AM
 #19

How is none of this illegal  Huh

I assume the partyvan havent been notified yet  Smiley

dizzy1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 02:06:51 AM
 #20

Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.

uh......no

Because you "plan" to have more than 50% of the network. But this would stop the current miners from moving to your chain, would it not?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!