BitcoinEXpress (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
|
 |
July 25, 2012, 01:29:17 AM
Last edit: May 30, 2016, 10:58:15 AM by BitcoinEXpress |
|
deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:31:56 AM |
|
Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?  |
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:32:45 AM |
|
It's not altchains without the drama.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns |
|
|
|
LoupGaroux
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:37:17 AM |
|
Old proverb... when the elephants start to get frisky, the ants get the fuck out of Denver. Looks like anywhere but downtown LTCville is the place to be for the next several days. I expect a nice refreshing drop in the difficulty level once this has all sorted itself, and the pools will gulp down the resultant flood of hashes on the new thread.
The more things change the more they stay the same... now Rapist is the sock-puppet of choice to attack BTCX (although I remember when she was just our darling little BCX, without the pesky "T"). And yes, obviously she is pretty... if you know anything at all about California Girls, well, if you don't know your ignorance shall be your bliss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:40:23 AM |
|
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
|
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
|
LoupGaroux
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:43:47 AM |
|
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21. |
|
|
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:47:57 AM |
|
Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty? Awwwww thanks Definitely a girl. Good looking too I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:48:09 AM |
|
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
Id eat her sandwiches any day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dizzy1
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:51:17 AM |
|
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:54:42 AM |
|
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution. |
|
|
|
|
crosby
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:56:48 AM |
|
quick question: why ?
|
Get your BTC and LTC at www.betcoinpartners.com/c/2/374 with FREEROLLS + Daily & Weekly Bonuses + Satellites + ON DEMAND tournaments + Instant Deposit + Instant Withdrawals + RING games + GTD Tournament + On Demand Satellite, + LIVE DEALER CASINO + SPORTSBOOK + 100% WELCOME BONUS www.betcoinpartners.com/c/2/374 150 btc ($100,000) gtd monthly, 75 btc ($50,000) gtd weekly and 10 BIG daily gtd ranging 0.5 btc to up to 20 btc |
|
|
|
|
VelvetLeaf
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
July 25, 2012, 01:59:50 AM |
|
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution. Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ? |
BTC : 1GN81dxzxyFPQsyAtdocXr5S9Mcg4wcfFG
LTC : LgmYvXsYXc4xdjsMKXJWqtagxVvioK6iaw
FC : 6dpSnKMtttUUYzaRu1EB7Lu18PBRVHU3V7
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 25, 2012, 02:00:02 AM |
|
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21. A Cameron Diaz pity lay is my hedge against the Mayan Apocalypse. I'll come out ahead either way. |
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
|
Simran
|
|
July 25, 2012, 02:01:51 AM |
|
How is none of this illegal  |
*Image Removed* Donate LTC: LRgbgTa3XNQSEUhnwC6Ye2vjiCV2CNRpib Donate BTC: 1AGP6xPTRvsAVhsRsBX13NUH6p6LJjyeiA
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz
|
|
July 25, 2012, 02:03:35 AM |
|
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution. Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ? You need to trust the lead developer which defeats the purpose of cryptocurrency in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Oz
|
|
July 25, 2012, 02:05:19 AM |
|
How is none of this illegal I assume the partyvan havent been notified yet |
|
|
|
|
dizzy1
|
|
July 25, 2012, 02:06:51 AM |
|
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
uh......no Because you "plan" to have more than 50% of the network. But this would stop the current miners from moving to your chain, would it not? |
|
|
|
|
|
