The first time in 6000 years..

[spazzdla]

That there has been a potential to uproot the families that have owned and controlled the gold.  This is the first time in thousands of years there is a chance that someone else could take control of the worlds wealth.  Those that have control of the gold control gov fiat.

Remeber this.  What BTC's value is is a lot less significant than the fact it is controlled by nerds.  IMO to remove the control of the worlds wealth from sociopaths and psychopaths offers potential non of us can even fathom.

[Beliathon]

Bitcoin 2: Revenge of the Nerds! 

[CanadaBits]

Ill take two gold blocks 

[Possum577]

So you propose that "we" take the control of wealth from other people so we can control it ourselves? Sounds hypocritical.

How about everyone has the opportunity to acquire their own wealth by providing goods or services to the community, for which the community pays them.

We shouldn't think about wealth as something we need to take from others but something we need to create on our own based on our own actions and decisions.

[AtheistAKASaneBrain]

Bitcoin 2: Revenge of the Nerds! 

Indeed , it is a revenge of the nerds. The real challenge is getting normal people involved for mega success.

[monkeygang]

Gonna have to hire a bunch of jocks to be the spokepeople.
Kinda how politicians are mostly puppets for the real bosses

[Bit_Happy]

That there has been a potential to uproot the families that have owned and controlled the gold.  This is the first time in thousands of years there is a chance that someone else could take control of the worlds wealth.  Those that have control of the gold control gov fiat.

Remeber this.  What BTC's value is is a lot less significant than the fact it is controlled by nerds.  IMO to remove the control of the worlds wealth from sociopaths and psychopaths offers potential non of us can even fathom.

Hillary Clinton and her friends have plans to make you obey!

[spazzdla]

So you propose that "we" take the control of wealth from other people so we can control it ourselves? Sounds hypocritical.

How about everyone has the opportunity to acquire their own wealth by providing goods or services to the community, for which the community pays them.

We shouldn't think about wealth as something we need to take from others but something we need to create on our own based on our own actions and decisions.

This would be awesome but will not work because of greed.  This is why we pay interest to privatly owned banks.

[Beliathon]

We shouldn't think about wealth as something we need to take from others but something we need to create on our own based on our own actions and decisions.

The only reasonable way to attempt to accomplish this goal to is delink wealth from survival. Meaning you'd need a society that agreed to provide all people with basic food, shelter, healthcare, and education regardless of where on earth they live, or who their parents aren't. As long as wealth is linked to survival people will treat it as something worth trampling on each other to get.

In other words, capitalism as we know it needs to be removed from the life support of quantitative easfinity and allowed to die. We can't build anything new while we're stuck with this zombie.

[turvarya]

Don't want to step on your dreams , but most bitcoin holders would give it up for gold if they got a good offer. People like to touch things, even nerds, that's why physical bitcoins are popular

The only thing I like to touch is my gf's boobs.
So, I am gonna touch my gf's boobs. Have fun with your gold.

[runpaint]

Who told you that there are families who have owned all the gold for 6000 years?  And why did you believe it?

[BitNerd]

That there has been a potential to uproot the families that have owned and controlled the gold.  This is the first time in thousands of years there is a chance that someone else could take control of the worlds wealth.  Those that have control of the gold control gov fiat.

Remeber this.  What BTC's value is is a lot less significant than the fact it is controlled by nerds.  IMO to remove the control of the worlds wealth from sociopaths and psychopaths offers potential non of us can even fathom.

I don't think gold is the only or the main thing that has ever maintained power. Nor do I believe sociopaths do not control most of btc just because they are "nerds".

There is even certain amount of freedom in democracy, it could be much worse. Communists or socialists could have actually taken over the world. It's just that democracy, like any government, exists on the basis of theft (taxes and inflation are theft) and forced monopoly.

I don't mind if someone has any amount of money beyond what I have, but I do mind if someone takes my money and interferes with my property.

[redhawk979]

So you propose that "we" take the control of wealth from other people so we can control it ourselves? Sounds hypocritical.

How about everyone has the opportunity to acquire their own wealth by providing goods or services to the community, for which the community pays them.

We shouldn't think about wealth as something we need to take from others but something we need to create on our own based on our own actions and decisions.

PeopleWhoHaveBitcoin.txt

Remember, its not a problem that the financial elite are so bad, its just that WE aren't the ones in charge like they are.