|
|
Guido
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1061
Merit: 1001
|
 |
February 20, 2015, 12:32:22 AM |
|
|
I am Bonkers BTW
Crypto OG
+
Digital Artist
|
|
|
|
|
traderman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 20, 2015, 12:35:51 AM |
|
If this thing works as planned, I can imagine the type of crap that will start to surface. Can you imagine how many people are keeping theirs mouths shut for fear of prosecution. that dude is fucking brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1
|
|
February 20, 2015, 12:38:33 AM |
|
If this thing works as planned, I can imagine the type of crap that will start to surface. Can you imagine how many people are keeping theirs mouths shut for fear of prosecution. that dude is fucking brilliant.
Release The Kraken |
|
|
|
|
|
CtrlAltBernanke420
|
|
February 20, 2015, 01:16:15 AM |
|
What he says is very interesting… So how do we turn this into a reality if for thousands of years the system has been designed to weed out 'parasites' like him and to takeover bitcoin so its not a threat to the establishment….
If bitcoin transactions really cost about $30. And scalability is being viewed and dealt with from the wrong perspective then, how do we be apart of what fixes these problems… I don't want to see bitcoin get ruined, and I find it very hard for another coin to gain trust if bitcoin gets infiltrated..
|
|
|
|
|
Guido
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1061
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 20, 2015, 01:22:47 AM |
|
|
I am Bonkers BTW
Crypto OG
+
Digital Artist
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
|
February 20, 2015, 01:34:31 AM |
|
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
bitwarrior
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 20, 2015, 01:37:34 AM |
|
Yep, darkleak will release a Pandora's Box alright. Let us see how this project will go. Would there be a lot of buyers and will there be a lot of interesting stuffs that will be released online?
|
|
|
|
|
|
inBitweTrust
|
|
February 20, 2015, 01:41:07 AM |
|
I respect and continue to support most of his projects but this statement doesn't make much sense in the context of decentralization: This doesn’t need to be a problem, in particular for the functionality of Bitcoin as an instrument to settle debts. The way banks work today is not that every transaction done between two parties is sent directly from one bank account to the other. Instead, they add up all transactions between the different banks, and settle the debts at the end of the day.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/17005/bitcoin-technology-worth-nothing-interview-dark-wallet-front-man-amir-taaki/I hold some of the same concerns he has, but the way to accomplish this is not to replace Visa / Mastercard where Bitcoin is another backbone settlement processor between centralized off the chain banks.... We don't have to adopt an overly simplistic approach either and just repeatedly scale up the block size from 1MB to 200MB. 7TPS isn't what we have right now but 2-7TPS realistically and that will not be sufficient even if we are processing most transactions on sidechains. We need to increase the blocksize regardless , perhaps more conservatively than what is initially being proposed however. Darkleaks is an amazing idea BTW... http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530093.100-darkleaks-lets-anyone-sell-secrets-for-bitcoin.htmlThis is the type of material that will make Wikileaks look conservative. bravo. |
|
|
|
|
CtrlAltBernanke420
|
|
February 20, 2015, 04:57:43 AM |
|
I respect and continue to support most of his projects but this statement doesn't make much sense in the context of decentralization: This doesn’t need to be a problem, in particular for the functionality of Bitcoin as an instrument to settle debts. The way banks work today is not that every transaction done between two parties is sent directly from one bank account to the other. Instead, they add up all transactions between the different banks, and settle the debts at the end of the day.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/17005/bitcoin-technology-worth-nothing-interview-dark-wallet-front-man-amir-taaki/I hold some of the same concerns he has, but the way to accomplish this is not to replace Visa / Mastercard where Bitcoin is another backbone settlement processor between centralized off the chain banks.... We don't have to adopt an overly simplistic approach either and just repeatedly scale up the block size from 1MB to 200MB. 7TPS isn't what we have right now but 2-7TPS realistically and that will not be sufficient even if we are processing most transactions on sidechains. We need to increase the blocksize regardless , perhaps more conservatively than what is initially being proposed however. Darkleaks is an amazing idea BTW... http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22530093.100-darkleaks-lets-anyone-sell-secrets-for-bitcoin.htmlThis is the type of material that will make Wikileaks look conservative. bravo. @ $30/transaction bitcoin will never work long term... |
|
|
|
|
|
inBitweTrust
|
|
February 20, 2015, 05:14:58 AM |
|
@ $30/transaction bitcoin will never work long term...
Agreed. Most people don't care about security and privacy and will not pay that much when there are other options available. There are already a couple alts that have some aspects better than btc for privacy and with advanced forms of TaPoS/PoS they can be designed secure enough , bitcoin will not compete with these alts if it raises TX fees that high and stays at 2-7TPS. Bitcoin needs to stay innovative and compete and no one is suggesting we need to sacrifice our core values to make that happen. |
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2070
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
|
February 20, 2015, 05:47:28 AM |
|
There will be running a lot of scams and lies on Darkleaks.
|
|
|
|
|
CtrlAltBernanke420
|
|
February 20, 2015, 07:21:59 PM |
|
There will be running a lot of scams and lies on Darkleaks.
im not saying were not in the early days of this thing… But when Microsoft accepts bitcoin, you know for the most part are not scamming you… the rest is basically what you know to do with code. Simply "blogging" is a form of code we know in our lives. How to use a computer is beginner code. |
|
|
|
|
|
cheekychap
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:01:15 PM |
|
There will be running a lot of scams and lies on Darkleaks.
I think it had something to verify everything. But I am sure, that part will be sorted out, as it would be the biggest concern. |
|
|
|
|
neoneros
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:04:58 PM |
|
There will be running a lot of scams and lies on Darkleaks.
I think it had something to verify everything. But I am sure, that part will be sorted out, as it would be the biggest concern. But will the general public care enough? wikilieaks, snowden, it stumped, now darkleaks might be promissing, but the general public only want's to have their bread and games, entertained and no worries. It would be a great thing if it would spread to the more passive public. Not the ye-sayers that also adopted bitcoin and other world revealing tech. |
|
|
|
koelen3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1007
Sooner or later, a man who wears two faces forgets
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:18:54 PM |
|
Though people might say bad of the site but i find it interesting
It got HD hollywood movies man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
albert11
|
|
February 20, 2015, 08:53:36 PM |
|
"""Is Bitcoin being corrupted right now? In some ways, yes. The Bitcoin Foundation is trying to establish itself as a central point of Bitcoin through which it can fund and steer development, while at the same time working together with the state and Wall Street. What’s going to happen, is that governments will use the Foundation to pressure Bitcoin development in certain directions.""" I saw it coming, people need to be careful about this bitcoin foundation, who decided to create it in the first place? why this need to always create a central governance? as time goes by i can clearly see where this is heading and it's bad news..they will try and create problems that bitcoin doesn't have and use this foundation to solve these problem we better move on to another cypto now, the freecoin  no foundation, no roundtable,no regulated exchange,no wallstreet nothing just math and decentalization |
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
February 20, 2015, 09:01:49 PM |
|
"""Is Bitcoin being corrupted right now?
In some ways, yes. The Bitcoin Foundation is trying to establish itself as a central point of Bitcoin through which it can fund and steer development, while at the same time working together with the state and Wall Street....
Just curious. Where did you hear that? Bitcoin is open source and decentralized. You could also make a foundation. The more the better. But I have never heard anything like that at BF and the people there are venomously anti-centralization. |
|
|
|
traderman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 20, 2015, 09:08:31 PM |
|
I am in full agreement, the Bitcoin Foundation needs to go big time. http://www.btcfeed.net/news/bitcoin-foundation-must-dismantled/"""Is Bitcoin being corrupted right now? In some ways, yes. The Bitcoin Foundation is trying to establish itself as a central point of Bitcoin through which it can fund and steer development, while at the same time working together with the state and Wall Street. What’s going to happen, is that governments will use the Foundation to pressure Bitcoin development in certain directions.""" I saw it coming, people need to be careful about this bitcoin foundation, who decided to create it in the first place? why this need to always create a central governance? as time goes by i can clearly see where this is heading and it's bad news..they will try and create problems that bitcoin doesn't have and use this foundation to solve these problem we better move on to another cypto now, the freecoin no foundation, no roundtable,no regulated exchange,no wallstreet nothing just math and decentalization |
|
|
|
|
|
