Russian section is not moderated

[Muhammed Zakir]

2Xandy: mainly, only 'politics' section must be moderated, other subsections is fine (ofc, can be a bit better).

Look https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=961364.918799;all and tell me you want to change your mind.

2Muhammed Zakir: take a look https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=794025.0 :
Peoples don't think (53.4%) that our section need in a mod.

Please read again:

theymos has said earlier "no poll". It is easy to manipulate. BTW, who got the most vouches for becoming a mod from users who posted there?

Even I could have manipulated it by voting 'no' just for some satoshis.

So, I think that my offering ('split'+'move' technique) is best solution. I'm sure that Satoshi will support my point in decentralized moderation.

In Meta, value is not for who raise the voice but for what he raise. However, I think Satoshi is an exception for this.

[1714861574]

1714861574

[1714861574]

1714861574

[xandry]

2Xandy: mainly, only 'politics' section must be moderated, other subsections is fine (ofc, can be a bit better).

I just wanted to say that most users do not care about what is happening in the "Politics". Just if you are going to discuss these things and spend a vote, then you need to do this so that most users are aware of this and have taken part. Currently it "just for fun".

[Balthazar]

Personally I think that the Politics subsection should be removed. We've lived without this subsection and there were no issues about that. There is no reason to think that we won't be able to do so again.

Maybe I'm wrong here but currently this subsection seems nothing but catalyst of the mutual hatred.

[-Greed-]

Personally I think that the Politics subsection should be removed. We've lived without this subsection and there were no issues about that. There is no reason to think that we won't be able to do so again.

Maybe I'm wrong here but currently this subsection seems nothing but catalyst of the mutual hatred.

You are wrong. Politcs section should never be removed. There is a disaster in the section because of having no mod. I also want to remind that you create majority (I would even call it "a shitload") of useless posts there.

[Pivo]

Moderator without our choice? What a trick!

Administrators, how about an opinion of Russian community?

You should create a topic in the Russian section to discuss whether a new moderator is necessary and, if so, who the new moderator should be. (Do not take a vote, though.) If there is consensus that one or more specific people should be made moderators, then I will (almost always) do it.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Congrats xandry! Don't misuse the power and utilise it at it's maximum extend. Best of luck moderating the forum.

Moderator without our choice? What a trick!

You(incl. all) couldn't suggest a person who knows the rule and how to judge posts.

Administrators, how about an opinion of Russian community?

They asked.

Bolded correct part for you.

You should create a topic in the Russian section to discuss whether a new moderator is necessary and, if so, who the new moderator should be. (Do not take a vote, though.) If there is consensus that one or more specific people should be made moderators, then I will (almost always) do it.

[stahanovec]

@Muhammed Zakir

FYI, lot of people in Russian section are dissatisfied with the new appointment.

[Pivo]

@Muhammed Zakir

The questions were of the administration. Are you the administrator?

[Muhammed Zakir]

@Muhammed Zakir

FYI, lot of people in Russian section are dissatisfied with the new appointment.

Thank you for telling! I understand. There maybe some problem with the "rank" but try to understand, you need a good mod not a highly ranked person. Good persons can be there without posting and spammers/scammers may make higher posts than them. I believe you will adjust with the situation.

@Muhammed Zakir

The questions were of the administration. Are you the administrator?

I am sorry. I ain't a mod, not even a staff. I was just trying to point you to correct part.

FYI: If you think xandry moderate the board in a bad way, report here. Good luck!

[stahanovec]

New moderator is promoting his referral links:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=928433.msg10194055#msg10194055
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924122.msg10306164#msg10306164
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869659.msg10297444#msg10297444

[stahanovec]

Thank you for telling! I understand. There maybe some problem with the "rank" but try to understand, you need a good mod not a highly ranked person. Good persons can be there without posting and spammers/scammers may make higher posts than them. I believe you will adjust with the situation.

What are you talked about? The new moderator makes advertising of his own referral links but fighting with others? This is a very biased behavior.

[Muhammed Zakir]

New moderator is promoting his referral links:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=928433.msg10194055#msg10194055
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924122.msg10306164#msg10306164
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869659.msg10297444#msg10297444

What are you talked about? The new moderator makes advertising of his own referral links but fighting with others? This is a very biased behavior.

Please check the date of the posts. He maybe was promoting referral link but I am sure he changed lately.

[Pivo]

I am sorry. I ain't a mod, not even a staff. I was just trying to point you to correct part.

Correct part it is opinion of the Russian community. We almost agreed who should be a new moderator, but you do not care of our opinion and made the decision instead of us.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Correct part it is opinion of the Russian community.

I agree partially but you did see the posts that was made here.

We almost agreed who should be a new moderator,

Who was it?

but you do not care of our opinion and made the decision instead of us.

Admins(we) do care about your opinions. Admins made xandry as mod as his reports were accurate and you couldn't suggest a person who is worthy of to become a mod. You should know "a moderator should know the rules and how to judge it. Just becoming trusty isn't a fact for becoming a mod".

[stahanovec]

Please check the date of the posts. He maybe was promoting referral link but I am sure he changed lately.

We will see what will happen. Some of these links have already deleted after "reported to moderator", but not all..

This link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=869659.msg10297444#msg10297444 is still available.

[-Greed-]

I'm glad that admins made the right choice. The topic now can be locked.

Cheers

[BTC.Miner]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=928433.msg10194055#msg10194055




He covers up the traces of its illegal activity. this man is not worthy to be a moderator.
All the people in the Russian part of this forum outraged and shocked by this appointment.
In the Russian community there are many people more deserving.

Please, forgive my bad English

[Pivo]

Who was it?

Russian section has many information and many sub-forums inside. We need 3 or even 4 moderators for effective work.

1. Wi-Fu

2. Pivo

3. fsb4000

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990069.msg10788595#msg10788595

[-Greed-]

Who was it?

Russian section has many information and many sub-forums inside. We need 3 or even 4 moderators for effective work.

1.Wi-Fu

2.Pivo

3.fsb4000

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990069.msg10788595#msg10788595

Forget about it. Two of three are on the blacklist. And Wi-Fu is connected with well-known Russian scammer (Mavrocoin, MMM). These people must never be mods of the forum!

@Muhammed Zakir

FYI, lot of people in Russian section are dissatisfied with the new appointment.

It's not true. I'm satisfied for instance.

[stahanovec]

Two of three are on the blacklist

You can shove your "blacklist" deep in your asshole. Thanks.