marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:23:42 AM Last edit: August 12, 2015, 09:53:52 AM by marcotheminer |
|
I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Madness
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:25:45 AM |
|
That would be an epic idea , yes . Simply contact each signature compaign Admin and ask them if they want to join the website . and just like you did for Bit-x make a page for each signature compaign with all the needed informations . Is an Open source , btw ? that would've be great too .
~ Madness
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:27:39 AM |
|
That would be an epic idea , yes . Simply contact each signature compaign Admin and ask them if they want to join the website . and just like you did for Bit-x make a page for each signature compaign with all the needed informations . Is an Open source , btw ? that would've be great too .
~ Madness
It wouldn't have a collection of users (like http://bitsig.website/thebot/) unless the campaign admin asks for such a thing. It would be a space with the campaign name and further details (payrates, dates, campaign details, etc) when clicked on. It wouldn't be open source for the time being.
|
|
|
|
Madness
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:29:13 AM |
|
That would be an epic idea , yes . Simply contact each signature compaign Admin and ask them if they want to join the website . and just like you did for Bit-x make a page for each signature compaign with all the needed informations . Is an Open source , btw ? that would've be great too .
~ Madness
It wouldn't have a collection of users (like http://bitsig.website/thebot/) unless the campaign admin asks for such a thing. It would be a space with the campaign name and further details (payrates, dates, campaign details, etc) when clicked on. It wouldn't be open source for the time being. Oh , I miss understood you then . Still that's a good idea I guess but you should always try to contact admins like I told you to make collection of users ~ Madness
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:31:30 AM |
|
That would be an epic idea , yes . Simply contact each signature compaign Admin and ask them if they want to join the website . and just like you did for Bit-x make a page for each signature compaign with all the needed informations . Is an Open source , btw ? that would've be great too .
~ Madness
It wouldn't have a collection of users (like http://bitsig.website/thebot/) unless the campaign admin asks for such a thing. It would be a space with the campaign name and further details (payrates, dates, campaign details, etc) when clicked on. It wouldn't be open source for the time being. Oh , I miss understood you then . Still that's a good idea I guess but you should always try to contact admins like I told you to make collection of users ~ Madness Yes of course, I would provide that collection if campaign managers ask for it.
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:50:24 AM |
|
If you are providing a collection of usernames, you will exclude some of the columns, right? Because posts excluding will be different for different campaigns.
-MZ
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:53:30 AM |
|
If you are providing a collection of usernames, you will exclude some of the columns, right? Because posts excluding will be different for different campaigns.
-MZ
Of course, collection of usernames would be tailored to each campaign that is interested in having the collection.
|
|
|
|
Madness
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:54:43 AM |
|
If you are providing a collection of usernames, you will exclude some of the columns, right? Because posts excluding will be different for different campaigns.
-MZ
I didn't look to the source code , but I would say they are using a Database , so it shouldn't be that hard to exclude anything , since all is done by some smart queries . each compaign should be in a different page/database and all should works EDIT : just saw maroco's post . ~ Madness
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:55:14 AM |
|
If you are providing a collection of usernames, you will exclude some of the columns, right? Because posts excluding will be different for different campaigns.
-MZ
I didn't look to the source code , but I would say they are using a Database , so it shouldn't be that hard to exclude anything , since all is done by some smart queries . each compaign should be in a different page/database and all should works EDIT : just saw maroco's post . ~ Madness Exactly as you said.
|
|
|
|
sase007
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:57:25 AM |
|
Thinking about joining campain... it looks good
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 21, 2015, 10:59:03 AM |
|
Thinking about joining campain... it looks good BIT-X? Yes, it is good .
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 22, 2015, 01:40:28 PM |
|
Anyone else have their thoughts?
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
February 24, 2015, 08:58:21 AM |
|
I may start to compile an easy to search/comprehend list of all signature campaigns soon!
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
May 02, 2015, 08:14:10 AM |
|
What do you think? It would be updated much more frequently than the current thread and be easier to sort through.
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
|
|
May 02, 2015, 09:38:41 AM |
|
What do you think? It would be updated much more frequently than the current thread and be easier to sort through.
I think it will be good if we have 2-3 page with all the signature campaigns, maybe you can write and add a form when the 'maintainers' of the signature campaigns can request the addiction of their sig. campaigns (and you will review only the data and confirm).
|
|
|
|
crazyivan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
DMD Diamond Making Money 4+ years! Join us!
|
|
May 02, 2015, 10:11:59 AM |
|
Why not, it s a great idea. Especially if it can make more people who start these campaigns to use this great bot.
|
|
|
|
Sarthak
|
|
May 02, 2015, 10:14:55 AM |
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x?
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
|
|
May 02, 2015, 10:19:00 AM |
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x? No, he wants: I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Sarthak
|
|
May 02, 2015, 10:26:50 AM |
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x? No, he wants: I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts? That wasn't the answer I was looking for! Why does he want to make it when we already have one which isn't even confusing and seems very good! Either You didn't answer OR I didn't get it
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042
#Free market
|
|
May 02, 2015, 10:30:52 AM |
|
(so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version).
Mitchells thread already has that so I don't think you need to do that hardwork! Btw, what do you mean by that(Quote)? Its very clear and not confusing at all! Edit: And I didn't understand the bitsig.website/thebot thing! You want to run a bot for all campaigns just like Bit-x? No, he wants: I might launch a collection of all signature campaigns on http://bitsig.website. It would have all signature campaigns with the necessary information (so would basically replace the confusion in the thread version). Thoughts? That wasn't the answer I was looking for! Why does he want to make it when we already have one which isn't even confusing and seems very good! Either You didn't answer OR I didn't get it He wants to create a page like the Mitch's thread ...not here in the forum but on http://bitsig.website. He does not want to 'run a bot for all the campaigns'. I think I have answered but you cannot understand (or most probable I can't explain better).
|
|
|
|
|