Hillary conducted official State business on her private e-mail account — ALL

[Chef Ramsay]

Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aide’s Secret Spy Network
Emails disclosed by a hacker show a close family friend was funneling intelligence about the crisis in Libya directly to the Secretary of State’s private account starting before the Benghazi attack.

Starting weeks before Islamic militants attacked the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, longtime Clinton family confidante Sidney Blumenthal supplied intelligence to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered by  a secret network that included a former CIA clandestine service officer, according to hacked emails from Blumenthal’s account.

The emails, which were posted on the internet in 2013, also show that Blumenthal and another close Clinton associate discussed contracting with a retired Army special operations commander to put operatives on the ground near the Libya-Tunisia border while Libya’s civil war raged in 2011.

Blumenthal’s emails to Clinton, which were directed to her private email account, include at least a dozen detailed reports on events on the deteriorating political and security climate in Libya as well as events in other nations. They came to light after a hacker broke into Blumenthal’s account and have taken on new significance in light of the disclosure that she conducted State Department and personal business exclusively over an email server that she controlled and kept secret from State Department officials and which only recently was discovered by congressional investigators.

Much more...http://www.propublica.org/article/private-emails-reveal-ex-clinton-aides-secret-spy-network

No wonder she had the server wiped out.

[Saw]

 Blah,Blah,Blah....Frakin Clintons,they have broken so many rules and laws they think they are above them and seem surprised that people actually live by them.Oh wait that's most Americans.....WTF

[Wilikon]

After he started editing her page in June 2005, Schilling became consumed with trying to capture her uncomfortable place in American culture, researching and writing a whole section on how she polarizes the public. At the same time, he also believes Hillary the woman is widely misunderstood. "One of the things I've tried to get across in the article was how much people were impressed by her before she got married to Bill," he says.


He told interviewers that though he voted for Clinton in the Democratic primary in 2008, he was not editing her site in order to get her elected, nor had he been in any contact with her staff.

"I'm definitely not protecting the person. I'm definitely protecting the article as a fair and viable biography," said Schilling. "We have an obligation to remove anything untrue."

"You constantly have to police [the page]," said Schilling. "Otherwise, it diverts into a state of nature.”

And police he does, as Fairbanks noted, “Hardly a news event or argument over her situation goes by without Wasted Time R's input: He edited her page 77 times in the last month, mostly pruning away changes he viewed as inappropriate, such as a rant about Geraldine Ferraro or a stealthy effort to diminish Hillary's role in improving the State Children's Health Insurance Program.” NJ.com’s Kelly Heyboer’s listed some of Schilling's edit wars leading up to the 2008 election, including removing the words "lesbian" and "communist," a reference to Clinton having "murdered" White House counsel Vince Foster in the 1990s, and replacing a deleted passage about Bill's affair with Gennifer Flowers.

Despite the high-profile nature of Clinton, Schilling has been in a unique position to “shape her article,” in large part because of his ongoing dedication; Wasted Time R’s editor page reveals that after nearly 10 years “guarding” the site, he remains a lead Hillary editor.

A few recent additions to the Hillary Rodham Clinton page provide some insight into the nature of the tone Schilling has established toward the 2016 hopeful. The section addressing the Benghazi hearing describes her as taking “formal responsibility” while defending her actions, but notably leaves out the notorious “What difference does it make...?” outburst, stating only that at points during her testimony she had “emotional or angry responses”:


Clinton gave Congressional testimony on the Benghazi attack on January 23, 2013. She defended her actions in response to the incident and, while still accepting formal responsibility, said she had had no direct role in specific discussions beforehand regarding consulate security. Congressional Republicans challenged her on several points, sometimes triggering emotional or angry responses from her.


Concerning her post-Secretary of State activities, the page notes that her foundation accepted “new donations from foreign governments, which it had stopped doing while she was secretary” and that Hillary began giving speeches for which she received “about $200,000 per engagement.”

It also acknowledges Emailgate, but downplays the legal and political ramifications and is mum on the Associated Press suing the State Department soon after the story broke:


In March 2015, Clinton's practice of using her own private e-mail address and server throughout her time as Secretary of State, rather than departmental ones, gained widespread public attention due to concerns about the security of mails she sent and received, the availability and preservation of them for Freedom of Information Act requests and the archival historical record, and whether her action had violated any federal laws, regulations, or guidelines. In response, Clinton said she had a few months earlier turned over many e-mails to the State Department following their request and that she wanted them made public.

Hillary's Wikipedia article consistently comes up near the top in a Google search for her name and earns hundreds of thousands of views each month. The New York Times may grow scandal-weary, but Hillary's Wikipedia watchdog remains steadfast in protecting her highly influential profile.


http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/hillary-gets-special-protection-wikipedia

[manis]

Ha ha. Very soon, this will read like a regular job profile.
Some enterprising businessman is going to come up with a company which "protects" your wikipedia entry.

[Chef Ramsay]

RNC on Clinton: 'Even Nixon didn't destroy the tapes'

...
Clinton's lawyer informed the House Select Committee investigating Benghazi on Friday that Clinton no longer had copies of any emails from her four-year tenure as secretary of State, ending in 2013.
 
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), the chairman of the committee, said in a statement Friday that "Clinton unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all emails from her personal server."
 
Gowdy, whose committee had subpoenaed the server earlier this month, charged that Clinton apparently decided to delete her emails after Oct. 28, 2014, when the State Department first asked her to turn over public records.
 
Clinton has turned over roughly 55,000 pages of documents to the State Department, though Republicans have have seized her admission this month that her aides deleted more than 30,000 "personal" emails.
...

More...http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/237296-rnc-on-clinton-even-nixon-didnt-destroy-the-tapes

[Wilikon]

Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aide’s Secret Spy Network
Emails disclosed by a hacker show a close family friend was funneling intelligence about the crisis in Libya directly to the Secretary of State’s private account starting before the Benghazi attack.

Starting weeks before Islamic militants attacked the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, longtime Clinton family confidante Sidney Blumenthal supplied intelligence to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gathered by  a secret network that included a former CIA clandestine service officer, according to hacked emails from Blumenthal’s account.

The emails, which were posted on the internet in 2013, also show that Blumenthal and another close Clinton associate discussed contracting with a retired Army special operations commander to put operatives on the ground near the Libya-Tunisia border while Libya’s civil war raged in 2011.

Blumenthal’s emails to Clinton, which were directed to her private email account, include at least a dozen detailed reports on events on the deteriorating political and security climate in Libya as well as events in other nations. They came to light after a hacker broke into Blumenthal’s account and have taken on new significance in light of the disclosure that she conducted State Department and personal business exclusively over an email server that she controlled and kept secret from State Department officials and which only recently was discovered by congressional investigators.

Much more...http://www.propublica.org/article/private-emails-reveal-ex-clinton-aides-secret-spy-network

No wonder she had the server wiped out.

[Wilikon]

Senate GOP Asking Questions About Huma Abedin’s Email Account

Senate Republicans are renewing efforts to learn why Huma Abedin, a top assistant to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was allowed to keep working at the agency under a special, part-time status while also being employed at a politically-connected consulting firm.

The new requests are being made by Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, following revelations that both women used a private Internet server and email accounts for State Department correspondence.

Grassley says the earlier requests to the department have been largely ignored, so the new ones have gone to the department’s inspector general and to Secretary of State John Kerry, seeking their involvement.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/28/senate-gop-asking-new-questions-about-emails-for-clinton-and-abedin-who-has/

[Wilikon]

Heilemann: Hillary Clinton's Convenience Argument Has "Crumbled At Her Feet"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwvoceEuPwQ


-----------------------------
Need to carry one device for convenience...

[Wilikon]

Report: In Email Correspondence, Hillary Clinton Mixed Business with Personal


Emails obtained by the AP show that Clinton occasionally mixed up personal correspondence with work-related matters. For example, Clinton once responded to an email about drone strikes in Pakistan from senior aide Huma Abedin with a series of questions about interior decorating.

http://freebeacon.com/blog/report-in-email-correspondence-hillary-clinton-mixed-business-with-personal/

[Wilikon]

Ex-FOIA Official: ‘There’s No Doubt’ Hillary Clinton Knew She Was Circumventing The Law


Former Freedom of Information Act official Daniel Metcalfe said that he had been part of so many Hillary Clinton scandals that he stopped counting at 23.

Metcalfe said that if the FOIA officer received a request for Clinton’s email correspondence that could include either her sending an email to State Department employee or receiving an email, the officer would go up to the secretary’s office and say that they would have to search through her emails. In Clinton’s case, the search would not take have taken long because there was nothing there.

The only result the search would reveal would be if she had sent an email to a State Department employee.

“I have referred to her ‘regime,’ so to speak, as a prescription for the blatant circumvention of the Freedom of the Information Act,” Metcalfe said.

Metcalfe also said that anything that is labeled as a scandal or “supposed cover-up” has records pertaining to the issue. From there, it becomes a legal issue.

“I do know that Secretary Clinton indeed had knowledge of how the Freedom of Information Act works,” Metcalfe said.


http://freebeacon.com/politics/ex-foia-official-theres-no-doubt-hillary-clinton-knew-she-was-circumventing-the-law/

[bryant.coleman]

Ha ha. Very soon, this will read like a regular job profile.
Some enterprising businessman is going to come up with a company which "protects" your wikipedia entry.

Wikipedia is complete BS. I was one of the earliest editors in Wikipedia and was active there until 2011. Once they got popular, Jimbo Wales started showing his true colors. A lot of the senior editors quit in disgust. Organized Cabals are controlling edits in some of the politically charged sections. All I can say is that Wikipedia is entirely unreliable, for subjects such as Politics, History, Religion.etc. And now they are begging for money.... 

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/01/penniless_and_desperate_wikipedia_sits_on_60m_cash/

http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/wikipedia-millions-bank-beg/

[galdur]

Martin Armstrong: "Hillary Commits A Crime And They Defend Her"

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/02/2015 - 10:49

MSNBC’s Ed Schultz who never saw a Democratic he did not like or a Republican who should not be executed, amazingly admitted in trying to defend Hillary that she is 67 years old and too old to know what she is doing. “There’s a lot of people in her demographic that just don’t want to be overwhelmed by that technology that are going to take the easier, simplest route to do something — I get that.”  You cannot get around the fact that what she did was criminal for when all those emails were subpoenaed by Congress, she failed to produce them or inform Congress she had a secret personal email. That is outright OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and anyone else would go to prison for 5 years. Then when they are discovered, she erases the files. Come on! Why are there three sets of laws – (1) for Democrats, (2) for Republicans, and (3) for the rest of us?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-02/martin-armstrong-hillary-commits-crime-and-they-defend-her

[Wilikon]

Report: Hillary Clinton’s Server a “Conterintelligence Disaster” – Magnet for Foreign Spy Services



Hillary Clinton’s private email server was a spy magnet for the Russian, Chinese, Iranian and other intelligence services, say current and former intelligence officials.

As secretary of state, Clinton routed all her government-related email through the server, based in her house in Chappaqua, New York. She reportedly hired a Cablevision (NYSE:CVC) subsidiary to run the server, with antivirus protection from Intel’s (NASDAQ:INTC) McAfee. And she registered her domain name, clintonmail.com, through Network Solutions.

Intelligence professionals fear that the use of the privately installed server, free of certified government defenses against foreign interception, has been a boon to foreign cyberspies.

“By using her own private server with email — which we now know was wholly unencrypted for the first three months of Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state — she left this easily interceptable by any decent 21st century SIGINT service,” said John Schindler, a former National Security Agency counterintelligence officer. SIGINT is shorthand for signals intelligence, or electronic spying.

“The name Clinton right on the email handle meant this was not a difficult find,” Schindler said. “We should assume Russians, Chinese and others were seeing this.”

‘Epic’ Counterintelligence Disaster

“In all, this is a counterintelligence disaster of truly epic proportions, not to mention that, since Clinton admitted she did not use higher-classification email systems at all” — systems like SIPR and JWICS, Schindler said — “we have to assume some bleed-over into her unsecured private email too, which makes this even worse.”

SIPR is the Secret Internet Protocol Router network that the Department of Defense runs to ensure secret communications for the U.S. military, other agencies and certain allies. JWICS is the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System for top-secret government communication. Both provide secure communications for the State Department and secretary of state. Clinton’s private server was not protected by the Department of Homeland Security’s Einstein intrusion detection system, which relies on NSA systems, for official State Department emails.

“She may have deleted 30,000 e-mails before turning her files over to the State Department, but that doesn’t mean that the Russians and the Chinese don’t have them,” said Michelle Van Cleave, former U.S. National Counterintelligence Executive.


http://news.investors.com/politics/040715-746883-hillary-clinton-email-server-vulnerable-to-china-russia-iran.htm

[Wilikon]

Darrell Issa asked Hillary Clinton about her personal email use in 2012



A House committee sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton more than two years ago asking if she used a personal email account for official business, but never received a direct answer to the question.

The correspondence — first reported Tuesday night by The New York Times — shows Rep. Darrell Issa asked Clinton about her personal email use on Dec. 13, 2012, writing in his capacity as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.


“Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal email account to conduct official business?” Issa wrote Clinton. “If so, please identify the account used.”

The letter also asked another question that turns out to be a pointed one in light of Clinton’s acknowledgement last month that she left office with tens of thousands of work-related emails in a personal account and did not provide copies to her former agency until last year, after an official there asked four former secretaries to turn over any such records.

“Does the agency require employees to certify on a periodic basis or at the end of their employment with the agency they have turned over any communications involving official business that they have sent or received using nonofficial accounts?” Issa asked in one of a series of eight questions sent to agency chiefs and obtained by POLITICO.

At the end of January 2013, about six weeks after the letter was sent, Clinton stepped down as secretary. The letter was answered in March of that year by State Department legislative affairs official Thomas Gibbons, who didn’t say whether Clinton had used personal email as secretary.

Gibbons said any State employee “should make it clear that his or her personal email is not being used for official business.”

Issa’s letter to Clinton, who formally announced her bid for the Democratic presidential nomination on Sunday, was one of a round of more than a dozen such inquiries he sent to agency chiefs across the government after it was disclosed that officials at the Environmental Protection Agency and elsewhere had conducted official business on private email accounts and government email accounts created under fake names.

Former Issa aide Kurt Bardella said State’s response fuels questions about Clinton’s handling of her email as secretary.

“Why did the State Department wait until after Secretary Clinton left office to respond to the Issa letter? Were Secretary Clinton’s efforts to deliberately conceal her official activities through use of her private email prompted by then-Chairman Issa’s request?” Bardella asked. “As is status quo with the Clintons, there are far more questions than answers and it’s likely that these revelations of her secrecy are just the tip of the iceberg.”

A State Department spokesman defended the agency’s response.

“The Department responds to thousands of Congressional inquiries and requests for information each year,” spokesman Alec Gerlach said in a statement. “In its March 2013 letter, the Department responded to the House Oversight Committee’s inquiry into the Department’s ‘policies and practices regarding the use of personal e-mail and other forms of electronic communications’ with a letter that described those policies in detail. We continue to work closely with Congress on various issues on the Department’s policies and procedures.”

The emails Clinton turned over to the State Department in paper form in December totaled about 55,000 pages. She said at her news conference last month that she deleted another set of emails, which aides said was of comparable size, after her lawyers concluded they were not work-related.

State Department officials have pledged to publicly release a redacted version of the emails Clinton turned over. That process is expected to take several months, but officials have declined to commit to a specific date.




http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/darrell-issa-hillary-clinton-personal-email-use-2012-116992.html


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/15/us/politics/hillary-clintonwas-asked-about-email-2-years-ago.html?referrer=&_r=1

[Sithara007]

This makes all emails much harder to obtain for a prosecuter. This makes any attempt at running for president impossible. Democrats are embarrassed. The ones that matter.

This is stupid.
If her private email gets hacked, she has nobody but herself to blame.

I believe you are missing the bigger picture, explicitly or not. The point is she did ALL STATE BUSINESS on her private email... Ok... But with whom?


You need both party to agree to use the back channel. If she is guilty, how come everyone who dealt with her emails aren't?




Do you see the bigger picture now?

 

Very valid point. To do business via mail, you need two parties. But this is really interesting that people on such high level can be that much innocent to not to know the implications of such acts of theirs.

[Wilikon]

State Dept Spox Grilled after Admitting 'No Intention' of Examining Undisclosed Clinton Donors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-FdKgNLDIk