any official reply from the admin about the bonus of reward 0.1 btc for the users post minimum 200 and activity 200 because i am eligible for this offer
It was the first 10 (in practice, 11) users only. The thread text (the post where the offer is made) has been updated to say no more rewards.
is there a way to check the results? Like if a word is chosen as a winner how can I know that it had the most tweets/followers etc.
You can use the tweet log (available in .txt and .html), write your own program to filter words and see a result with the same numbers.
If you monitor games that have words with a lower tweet frequency, you are able to check the tweet count / follower count etc in real time.
how do you know some game is pretty obvious, since you are the owner, you must understand well the rules of it, i dont see anything being obvious easy money to take away there as it could be pure random isnt it?
The rules should be easy to understand to anyone. As to why I think some games were obvious and easy to win:
1)
https://betwitter.com/game/164/statement/battle-of-the-sexesThe outcome was pretty much guaranteed for this one, if you were aware that it was international women's day.
It was free bitcoins. In the literal sense.
2)
https://betwitter.com/game/112/statement/more-calm-than-panicCalm is a more frequently used word. As such, True had 6 bets, whereas False had 2. Calm had over twice as many tweeters.
3)
https://betwitter.com/game/140/statement/girlfriend-is-more-popular-than-the-wifeThis was a clone game, Girlfriend was the previous result, it was bound to win this time as well.
4)
https://betwitter.com/game/97/selection/which-city-is-the-most-popular-one"London" wasn't guaranteed, but it had good probabilities. Better than dice
5)
https://betwitter.com/game/103/selection/followers-of-jesus-and-allahAllah has more tweeters, so a better chance for the higher follower count to be it. And it won.
^^^
And these are really just scratching the surface, not employing any deeper investigation like time of day when the tweets are sampled, mass psychology effects of week vs weekend, etc.
.01 min bet? Nope. Sorry, needs to be lower.
You are free to choose your min bet when you submit a game. Most I have submitted had a 0.005 BTC minimum bet, but for some (maybe 4 out of a hundred or two) I chose 0.01. Most are 0.005 though and could be even lower. I would prefer some games with a big pot, with a low minimum but many players raising the pot (
because, of course, betting a bigger amount means you get a bigger slice of the pie when you win). The problem is currently everyone waiting for everyone else to post bets, everyone's waiting for the pot to grow big on both sides or at least the opposing side. And a lot of people find the entry/pot to be too small to play. Which is sad because sometimes reading the tweet logs can be pretty funny, even if you don't play. And some results are interesting.
No words had any stats in the beginning, they're sampled during games. It seems that horse/fish are a new breed
Here's a list of some words sampled for a few days before the site went live(-ish).
https://betwitter.com/wordsample.html - it's just an HTML, you'll seem to be logged out but you won't be.
I don't like minimum bet requirement too. If you want to achieve higher traffic to your site/ more users, you should remove that limit IMHO.
Obviously there has to be a minimum. I tried to aim for the middle ground where resulting pots aren't completely miniscule but it's still not a lot of money either. That's why most are 0.005. I'll try a few smaller and bigger ones too
Another one: too much rounding, my balance is 0.1, I bet 0.005 and suddenly my balance is 0.09
That's just the top bar where space is stuffed. Click on your balance and you'll get the exact number. It's up to 8 digits and you see your wallet history too.
