Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 08:11:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New computer running Nvidia GPU's that can mine faster than our ATI rigs.  (Read 2742 times)
RchGrav (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:09:54 PM
 #1

From Engadget...



"Sure, IBM's ten petaflop supercomputer may sound impressive, but Cray can do you five better -- the outfit just announced the Cray XK6, an upgradable, hybrid supercomputing system capable of more than 50 petaflops of computational muscle. Powered by Cray's Gemini interconnect, AMD Opteron 6200 processors, and NVIDIA Tesla 20-Series GPUs, the XK6 system blends x86 and GPU environments with the firm's own flavor of Linux. The folks at Cray won't resort to bragging, however -- they're humbly declaring the machine to be the first "general-purpose supercomputer based on GPU technology," and not, as they put it, a stunt to place high on any Top 500 lists."

http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/25/cray-xk6-supercomputer-smashes-petaflop-record-humbly-calls-its/

So...  exactly how many Gigahashes does 50+ petaflops equate to anyway?

4C 6F 6E 67  4C 69 76 65  42 69 74 63 6F 69 6E
Qba'g lbh unir nalguvat orggre gb qb?
1714896714
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896714

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896714
Reply with quote  #2

1714896714
Report to moderator
1714896714
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896714

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896714
Reply with quote  #2

1714896714
Report to moderator
1714896714
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896714

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896714
Reply with quote  #2

1714896714
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714896714
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714896714

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714896714
Reply with quote  #2

1714896714
Report to moderator
Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:14:40 PM
 #2

So...  exactly how many Gigahashes does 50+ petaflops equate to anyway?
A bit more than the current hashrate of Bitcoin combined (~48 Petaflops according to http://bitcoinwatch.com/)

https://www.coinlend.org <-- automated lending at various exchanges.
https://www.bitfinex.com <-- Trade BTC for other currencies and vice versa.
PRCman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:18:22 PM
 #3

From Engadget...

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/05/crayxk6.jpg

"Sure, IBM's ten petaflop supercomputer may sound impressive, but Cray can do you five better -- the outfit just announced the Cray XK6, an upgradable, hybrid supercomputing system capable of more than 50 petaflops of computational muscle. Powered by Cray's Gemini interconnect, AMD Opteron 6200 processors, and NVIDIA Tesla 20-Series GPUs, the XK6 system blends x86 and GPU environments with the firm's own flavor of Linux. The folks at Cray won't resort to bragging, however -- they're humbly declaring the machine to be the first "general-purpose supercomputer based on GPU technology," and not, as they put it, a stunt to place high on any Top 500 lists."

http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/25/cray-xk6-supercomputer-smashes-petaflop-record-humbly-calls-its/

So...  exactly how many Gigahashes does 50+ petaflops equate to anyway?

I am new to bitcoin, but such as I know, the flops and hashes are totally different.
flops are float computing unit while hashes are integer computing unit
carbonc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 60


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:21:01 PM
 #4

I'll take 2 please  Grin
Isepick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:29:19 PM
 #5

And if you don't think the US Gov't can't afford 2 of these and then fire em up and pwn the network at will...
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:29:50 PM
 #6

I am new to bitcoin, but such as I know, the flops and hashes are totally different.
flops are float computing unit while hashes are integer computing unit

Correct. And there is no correct way to make a meaningful conversion equation between FLOPS and MIPS.

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
RchGrav (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:33:39 PM
 #7

I am new to bitcoin, but such as I know, the flops and hashes are totally different.
flops are float computing unit while hashes are integer computing unit

Correct. And there is no correct way to make a meaningful conversion equation between FLOPS and MIPS.

Will. didnt he say flops and hashes?

Doesn't flops indicate how quickly math can be done.. and a hash is a cryptographic function using math?

Or do hashes better coorelate to MIPS..


Someone should e-mail cray and ask how many SHA256 operations it can perform per second, lol.

4C 6F 6E 67  4C 69 76 65  42 69 74 63 6F 69 6E
Qba'g lbh unir nalguvat orggre gb qb?
w128
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:39:15 PM
 #8

I am new to bitcoin, but such as I know, the flops and hashes are totally different.
flops are float computing unit while hashes are integer computing unit

Correct. And there is no correct way to make a meaningful conversion equation between FLOPS and MIPS.

Will. didnt he say flops and hashes?

Doesn't flops indicate how quickly math can be done.. and a hash is a cryptographic function using math?

Or do hashes better coorelate to MIPS..

Someone should e-mail cray and ask how many SHA256 operations it can perform per second, lol.

Different kinds of math, floating point versus integer. There's no direct correlation between ability to perform one or the other.
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:42:04 PM
 #9

Science = FLOPS
Hashing = MIPS

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
RchGrav (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2011, 01:45:01 PM
Last edit: May 25, 2011, 02:03:41 PM by RchGrav
 #10

I am new to bitcoin, but such as I know, the flops and hashes are totally different.
flops are float computing unit while hashes are integer computing unit

Correct. And there is no correct way to make a meaningful conversion equation between FLOPS and MIPS.

Will. didnt he say flops and hashes?

Doesn't flops indicate how quickly math can be done.. and a hash is a cryptographic function using math?

Or do hashes better coorelate to MIPS..

Someone should e-mail cray and ask how many SHA256 operations it can perform per second, lol.

Different kinds of math, floating point versus integer. There's no direct correlation between ability to perform one or the other.

I'm curious..

Why would bitcoinwatch use TeraFLOPS as an alternate unit of measure to indicate the network hashrate of the bitcoin network if it doesn't even correlate correctly?

Network Hashrate   TeraFLOP/s   48249

Kinda silly to do such a thing... if the math doesn't even work.

4C 6F 6E 67  4C 69 76 65  42 69 74 63 6F 69 6E
Qba'g lbh unir nalguvat orggre gb qb?
tiberiandusk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 575
Merit: 500


The North Remembers


View Profile WWW
May 25, 2011, 02:19:03 PM
 #11

Tesla cards are good for double point precision calculations which is good for science simulations where accuracy is paramount. Bitcoin mining relies on raw mathing power where accuracy isn't as important as speed. Yes, I just said mathing. Tongue

Bitcoin Auction House http://www.BitBid.net BTC - 1EwfBVC6BwA6YeqcYZmm3htwykK3MStW6N | LTC - LdBpJJHj4WSAsUqaTbwyJQFiG1tVjo4Uys Don't get Goxed.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!