|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
PRCman (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 25, 2011, 03:15:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:20:55 PM |
|
probably 6670 ultimate. 4x less shaders than 5870, but pack lot more per/watt and also not require fan-based cooler. just plug 16x or 32x of this babies into PCI-e switch and FIRE it !  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freakin
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:33:43 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
PRCman (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:36:51 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s I can't buy it in PR.China, how much is the ship cost to Hongkong? |
|
|
|
|
grue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:42:30 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s I can't buy it in PR.China, how much is the ship cost to Hongkong? probably $20+ more. |
|
|
|
|
Jaime Frontero
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:43:05 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s the price may be off - but the cost/benefit ratios between all the cards is pretty good. i run every one of the 58xx series in various miners, and i'm happy with the accuracy of the spreadsheet. i also note that, in general, the 58xx series is overall the hands-down winner in $/Mh/s. of course, once you get into a more practical calculation - i.e., Dollars/Mhash/sec/computer - the 5850 and 5870 turn out more competitive numbers, simply because the megahashage you can cram into a single box is higher. |
|
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:44:11 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
|
|
|
|
|
hiVe
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 254
Merit: 250
https://www.soar.earth/
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:49:09 PM |
|
6950 doing 400 and 5870 = 370m/h? vice versa maybe...
also your power estimates are off, the 6950 consumes 1/4th more than 5870...
or have I misunderstood something?
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Frontero
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:49:55 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
other way 'round. 5870 = 400 Mh/s 6950 = 370 Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:55:38 PM |
|
Is it really so hard to open a spreadsheet and plug in the numbers that no one can do it themselves? How many of these threads do we need?
|
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:56:01 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
other way 'round. 5870 = 400 Mh/s 6950 = 370 Mh/s yep. until you: 1. "unlock" extra cores to turn 6950 to 6970[works on70% 6950's] 2. use phoenix miner. 3. mine w/o vectorisation w/256-worksize. basicly 5870 is better card, except that 69x0's had Rendering back-end and more faster ram. but thats meaningful only for games/3D. and had better power subsystem to support more hungry chip. |
|
|
|
|
|
