|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
PRCman (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 25, 2011, 03:15:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:20:55 PM |
|
probably 6670 ultimate. 4x less shaders than 5870, but pack lot more per/watt and also not require fan-based cooler. just plug 16x or 32x of this babies into PCI-e switch and FIRE it !  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freakin
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:33:43 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
PRCman (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:36:51 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s I can't buy it in PR.China, how much is the ship cost to Hongkong? |
|
|
|
|
grue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:42:30 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s I can't buy it in PR.China, how much is the ship cost to Hongkong? probably $20+ more. |
|
|
|
|
Jaime Frontero
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:43:05 PM |
|
that price is off. Newegg has 5830 for $109, and they were on sale last week for $99/each so $.33/Mh/s the price may be off - but the cost/benefit ratios between all the cards is pretty good. i run every one of the 58xx series in various miners, and i'm happy with the accuracy of the spreadsheet. i also note that, in general, the 58xx series is overall the hands-down winner in $/Mh/s. of course, once you get into a more practical calculation - i.e., Dollars/Mhash/sec/computer - the 5850 and 5870 turn out more competitive numbers, simply because the megahashage you can cram into a single box is higher. |
|
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:44:11 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
|
|
|
|
|
hiVe
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 254
Merit: 250
https://www.soar.earth/
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:49:09 PM |
|
6950 doing 400 and 5870 = 370m/h? vice versa maybe...
also your power estimates are off, the 6950 consumes 1/4th more than 5870...
or have I misunderstood something?
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Frontero
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:49:55 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
other way 'round. 5870 = 400 Mh/s 6950 = 370 Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:55:38 PM |
|
Is it really so hard to open a spreadsheet and plug in the numbers that no one can do it themselves? How many of these threads do we need?
|
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
Basiley
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 25, 2011, 03:56:01 PM |
|
meaning both 6950 and 5870 had same cost nowdays and give about 400Mh/s and 370MH/s respectively, while last one - consume nearly 1/4 more power ... ~$220 each.
but if you had access to you regional distributor store, you can get 68x0's for about $100. its about 170MH/s
other way 'round. 5870 = 400 Mh/s 6950 = 370 Mh/s yep. until you: 1. "unlock" extra cores to turn 6950 to 6970[works on70% 6950's] 2. use phoenix miner. 3. mine w/o vectorisation w/256-worksize. basicly 5870 is better card, except that 69x0's had Rendering back-end and more faster ram. but thats meaningful only for games/3D. and had better power subsystem to support more hungry chip. |
|
|
|
|
|
