|
myrkul
|
 |
August 14, 2012, 05:39:09 AM |
|
Your claim was that you knew all the variables which determine what causes desperation in people.
Quote the post where I said that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dalkore
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:40:02 AM |
|
best case scenario we have an established ID system that 99% of people trust and he can't counterfeit an ID and he doesnt' have id, people will see him as a suspicious person because he doesn't have that ID
Yeah, something like that. If there is a market need for non-forgable ID cards, then they'll be provided. Probably by a federated group of agencies. It sure starting to sound like a central government with all kinds of enumerated powers. Federated groups, Rights enforcers, etc... You wish I would troll you, I am just waiting for some real debate food. Why should I take time actually flexing intellectual muscle if your responses are weak with lots of solutions that really sound like what I believe is necessary no matter how it operates or what we decide to call it? You may even call me an anti-disestablishmentarianist. Have you read that article I linked yet? I browsed it but for you, I am going to read it right now and I will tell you what I think. I will really read it right now. |
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:43:08 AM |
|
Your claim was that you knew all the variables which determine what causes desperation in people.
Quote the post where I said that. Posts 26 through in 30 in aggregate contain enough to make it clear what you were claiming. |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:44:40 AM |
|
Your claim was that you knew all the variables which determine what causes desperation in people.
Quote the post where I said that. Posts 26 through in 30 in aggregate contain enough to make it clear what you were claiming. Quote the post where I said that. |
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:46:14 AM |
|
Your claim was that you knew all the variables which determine what causes desperation in people.
Quote the post where I said that. Posts 26 through in 30 in aggregate contain enough to make it clear what you were claiming. Quote the post where I said that. Posts 26 through in 30 in aggregate. |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:49:04 AM |
|
In other words, you cannot, you only (falsely) assumed you knew what I was saying.
Derp.
|
|
|
|
Dalkore
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:52:12 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
|
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
|
FirstAscent
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:54:06 AM |
|
In other words, you cannot, you only (falsely) assumed you knew what I was saying.
Derp.
You're perfectly welcome to tell yourself what you wish. It matters not to me. Posts 26 through 30 speak well enough for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:54:34 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
Allowing competition in the industries of protection and justice is a joke? Why do those industries require monopoly? |
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 05:58:14 AM |
|
In other words, you cannot, you only (falsely) assumed you knew what I was saying.
Derp.
You're perfectly welcome to tell yourself what you wish. It matters not to me. Posts 26 through 30 speak well enough for me. You're perfectly welcome to tell yourself what you wish. It matters not to me. I never said what you think I said. |
|
|
|
Dalkore
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026
Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012
|
|
August 14, 2012, 06:09:05 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
Allowing competition in the industries of protection and justice is a joke? Why do those industries require monopoly? They need to be uniform. If they are not then you are not applying justice equally across your society. Certain public services should not be effected by market forces, these are some of them. |
Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - LinkTransaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 06:14:25 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
Allowing competition in the industries of protection and justice is a joke? Why do those industries require monopoly? They need to be uniform. If they are not then you are not applying justice equally across your society. Certain public services should not be effected by market forces, these are some of them. Why is applying justice equally preferable to applying justice fairly? Allowing market competition in the justice industry will allow those affected to select the best service. Poor justice will not receive business. What public services should not be affected by market forces? |
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031
RIP Mommy
|
|
August 14, 2012, 06:56:53 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
Allowing competition in the industries of protection and justice is a joke? Why do those industries require monopoly? So the monopolist can wave the "qualified immunity" carte blanche and get away with practically every injustice, and fail to prosecute itself to anywhere near the appropriate extent! |
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 14, 2012, 07:03:58 AM |
|
Ok, now that I have read the meat. Bottom-line is that the legal remedies have no teeth unless you have a central authority and unless it is paid by everyone equally, then it would be a goon squad like Blackwater or some other private enforcement agency. Yes, we all give us some of our individual rights so a 3rd party can enforce the most important ones. Without it you have goons or mafia. If that is what you want to live under, more power to you but to even suggest this is viable or even a good solution is a joke.
Allowing competition in the industries of protection and justice is a joke? Why do those industries require monopoly? So the monopolist can wave the "qualified immunity" carte blanche and get away with practically every injustice, and fail to prosecute itself to anywhere near the appropriate extent! Or just straight-up Sovereign immunity. |
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031
RIP Mommy
|
|
August 14, 2012, 07:07:50 AM |
|
/nods
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
August 17, 2012, 12:02:55 PM |
|
I have just read the article, originally published as "De la production de la sécurité," in the Journal des Economistes in February 1849, The Production of Security, by Gustave de Molinari. It directly touches upon the discussion here, and even presented an opinion of Communism and Monarchy being the two sides of the same coin that I had not seen before. Quite interesting. It is widely considered the first appearance of the system which would later become known as Anarcho-Capitalism, or Market Anarchy, by proposing that, like other industries, security (that is, government) would be best served by being delivered on the open market, rather than by a monopoly or by communism. It's quite short, and took up less than an hour of my time, all told. Well worth it. |
|
|
|
|
