yjacket
|
|
August 08, 2012, 03:50:56 PM |
|
I'll sell you a '94 Ford Taurus Wagon for $4000 plus delivery. It goes a whopping 85 MPH according to the spedometer! (Hey, when you get up to 67ish, the car starts to vibrate too -- built in massage!)
Conan: <Points to the hood of his '92 Taurus SHO> "I call that the ranch" Guy: "Why" Conan: "It's where my 220 horses live" Only video i could find: http://www.noob.us/humor/conan-o-brien-talks-about-his-92-ford-taurus/
|
|
|
|
yjacket
|
|
August 08, 2012, 03:51:28 PM |
|
Subaru Imprezza WRX Sti, 4 cylinder turbo, 300+ HP stock, Will blow the doors off of most V8 mustangs no problem.....
V6 stock mustang is 300+ V8 stock mustang is 400+ Are you retarded? You are for sure. 2012 Ford Mustang V6 - 305HP 2012 Ford Mustang V8 - 412HP Right, and every single mustang is a 2012. He's clearly talking about the older ones. And every single WRX is 2012. LOL. 2003 WRX is 220HP. 2003 V8 is 260HP He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
|
|
|
|
Gomeler
|
|
August 08, 2012, 03:53:29 PM |
|
Subaru Imprezza WRX Sti, 4 cylinder turbo, 300+ HP stock, Will blow the doors off of most V8 mustangs no problem.....
V6 stock mustang is 300+ V8 stock mustang is 400+ Are you retarded? You are for sure. 2012 Ford Mustang V6 - 305HP 2012 Ford Mustang V8 - 412HP Right, and every single mustang is a 2012. He's clearly talking about the older ones. And every single WRX is 2012. LOL. 2003 WRX is 220HP. 2003 V8 is 260HP He said STI, go look up what most of them have. STi has been ~250whp since it's launch in 2004. I don't care about crank horses. Crank horses aren't real horses, we don't drive engine blocks through the corners and straights on a track.
|
|
|
|
vampire
|
|
August 08, 2012, 03:56:48 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops.
|
|
|
|
CecilNiosaki
|
|
August 08, 2012, 04:01:38 PM |
|
I'll sell you a '94 Ford Taurus Wagon for $4000 plus delivery. It goes a whopping 85 MPH according to the spedometer! (Hey, when you get up to 67ish, the car starts to vibrate too -- built in massage!)
Conan: <Points to the hood of his '92 Taurus SHO> "I call that the ranch" Guy: "Why" Conan: "It's where my 220 horses live" Only video i could find: http://www.noob.us/humor/conan-o-brien-talks-about-his-92-ford-taurus/That basically sums up how I feel every day. lol.
|
|
|
|
yjacket
|
|
August 08, 2012, 04:11:33 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops. What was a trick question? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. no one mentioned 2003 except for you.
|
|
|
|
vampire
|
|
August 08, 2012, 04:23:14 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops. What was a trick question? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. no one mentioned 2003 except for you. a) you came to the thread and called me a moron b) i've proven that you're a moron and clueless about cars
|
|
|
|
Gomeler
|
|
August 08, 2012, 04:30:18 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops. What was a trick question? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. no one mentioned 2003 except for you. a) you came to the thread and called me a moron b) i've proven that you're a moron and clueless about cars In the end you two are bitching about comparable cars in similar price brackets with vastly different upgrade paths. This is like comparing an equal sized apple and an orange. Fuck it, they are both delicious in different ways. If all you do is keep the cars stock and race them in a straight line or around a track it doesn't matter as they are practically the same. It only matters which car is which when you spend some time wrenching on the cars and fixing issues the manufacture created in order to satisfy the masses. Back seat? Don't need that. Soft suspension? Get that crap out of here. Quiet, limiting exhaust? Toss that too. Bitch less, enjoy driving more.
|
|
|
|
dank (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
August 08, 2012, 04:35:50 PM |
|
V8 doesn't mean shit... What do you drive a crown vic ? 4.6L v8 with under 200 HP LOL.....
My 5 cylinder Volvo 850 turbo pushes 260hp.....
Subaru Imprezza WRX Sti, 4 cylinder turbo, 300+ HP stock, Will blow the doors off of most V8 mustangs no problem.....
That BMW would be a nice nice car....
I think he just wants someone to lend him a huge amount of coins so he can take off and start his life over.....
Let's just say I've beaten that BMW easily before. Don't take this the wrong way but I'd beat yours too. It's an old car but it's nice. Your thoughts are completely wrong, I want money so I can take off with my life. Do you think it's bad? I think it's good for no experience. Jimi Hendrix only starts playing when he was 15.
No offense, and it is certainly more than i can do, but that wasn't good. I'm glad you believe in yourself Dank, but you need to have some thoughts of failure. Even great musicians don't always make it, due to circumstances or a lack of creativity. This entire thread reeks of Mania. The insurance isn't for you, it's for me. If I own the car and you kill someone(high or not), the victim's family can sue me. I asking what state so I can check local laws. Also, have you heard of delayed gratification? It's very sweet. Mania. Heh that's a funny word. Delayed gratification is great but it's only delayed because you didn't make it happen sooner.
|
|
|
|
yjacket
|
|
August 08, 2012, 05:23:07 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops. What was a trick question? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. no one mentioned 2003 except for you. a) you came to the thread and called me a moron b) i've proven that you're a moron and clueless about cars a) I called you a retard because you completely missed what the guy was saying. He said his "STI can blow the doors off most V8 mustangs. This is completely accurate. A stock STI will blow away any pre 2012 stock V8 mustang. You basically pulled a Dwight and said False. b) Show your work. I don't know why you would bring up the horsepower numbers of a WRX when we are talking about a WRX STi. All i did was tell you that we were talking about an STi, not a plain WRXs. Again, you tried to pull a Dwight about how there were no U.S. 2003 WRX STis. I never asserted that there were. I don't own an STI and never have. I have a 2003 BMW 325xi, it's not fast. I'll probably get a Honda next. I don't even care about mustang v. STi. However, if I had to choose, I would choose an STi over a 2012 stang. As others have said, it has a much easier upgrade path to some serious power, and being AWD, it can actually put that power down. In addition, its suspension is much better. The mustang is probably better with ladies. I don't care if you think you know more about cars than me, it's not a concern of mine. I'm sorry if I offended you, it was not my intent.
|
|
|
|
Gomeler
|
|
August 08, 2012, 05:46:05 PM |
|
He said STI, go look up what most of them have.
Oh yea? That was a trick question, in US there were no STI models in 2003. Whoops. What was a trick question? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. no one mentioned 2003 except for you. a) you came to the thread and called me a moron b) i've proven that you're a moron and clueless about cars a) I called you a retard because you completely missed what the guy was saying. He said his "STI can blow the doors off most V8 mustangs. This is completely accurate. A stock STI will blow away any pre 2012 stock V8 mustang. You basically pulled a Dwight and said False. b) Show your work. I don't know why you would bring up the horsepower numbers of a WRX when we are talking about a WRX STi. All i did was tell you that we were talking about an STi, not a plain WRXs. Again, you tried to pull a Dwight about how there were no U.S. 2003 WRX STis. I never asserted that there were. I don't own an STI and never have. I have a 2003 BMW 325xi, it's not fast. I'll probably get a Honda next. I don't even care about mustang v. STi. However, if I had to choose, I would choose an STi over a 2012 stang. As others have said, it has a much easier upgrade path to some serious power, and being AWD, it can actually put that power down. In addition, its suspension is much better. The mustang is probably better with ladies.I don't care if you think you know more about cars than me, it's not a concern of mine. I'm sorry if I offended you, it was not my intent. I can confirm this. Ladies are all "what is that big wing for? Why does it have that big hump on the hood? Why does it make so many weird noises? Why is the backseat so uncomfortable? Why is the front seat so uncomfortable? Why isn't it automatic?" Well, most dudes are the same way.. can't fault the ladies for judging an ugly car The loud pedal is very fun though.
|
|
|
|
vampire
|
|
August 08, 2012, 06:05:48 PM Last edit: August 08, 2012, 06:18:36 PM by vampire |
|
a) I called you a retard because you completely missed what the guy was saying. He said his "STI can blow the doors off most V8 mustangs. This is completely accurate. A stock STI will blow away any pre 2012 stock V8 mustang. You basically pulled a Dwight and said False.
Nope wrong. You may be right about ONE single year - 2004, the only one year when STI blows a stang away. From 2005 Mustang were completely rebuilt. Also I can easily get Cobra's results for 2004, which is V8 (supercharged) 2004 V8 Mustang is about 260HP 2004 STI is about 300HP 2005 V8 Mustang is about 300HP 2005 STI is about 300HP 2011 V8 Mustang is about 400HP 2011 STI is about 300HP b) Show your work. I don't know why you would bring up the horsepower numbers of a WRX when we are talking about a WRX STi. All i did was tell you that we were talking about an STi, not a plain WRXs. Again, you tried to pull a Dwight about how there were no U.S. 2003 WRX STis. I never asserted that there were.
I've said 2003. Idiot, do you get that were no 2003 STIs in USA? You're such a retard. edit: Pre 2012 comparison, from http://www.zeroto60times.com/2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Limited Edition Sedan 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter Mile 13.7 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Sedan 0-60 mph 4.9 Quarter Mile 13.3 2011 Subaru Impreza WRX STI tS Sedan 0-60 mph 4.8 Quarter Mile 13.2 vs 2011 Ford Mustang V6 0-60 mph 5.3 Quarter Mile 13.8 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 0-60 mph 4.5 Quarter Mile 13.0 2011 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 0-60 mph 4.0 Quarter Mile 12.2
|
|
|
|
P4man
|
|
August 08, 2012, 06:17:12 PM |
|
I haven't heard any voice, but he posted this. I was going to offer my services as a guitar instructor of 10+ years...but I assumed he was just trolling. Troll level=godlike. He'll need your services from what I've heard from that audio file. Get him started on the basics first please. I downloaded it (against my better judgement), opened it in a music player, didnt hear anything, so I turned up my volume and wow, I heard some really good music! Then I realized it was my internet radio that I had muted. .
|
|
|
|
dank (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
August 08, 2012, 06:35:36 PM |
|
Thank you all for your humorous input, I will post another clip one day.
The argument about the cars is irrelevant, BMWs are nicer with the ladies and faster.
|
|
|
|
yjacket
|
|
August 08, 2012, 06:56:53 PM |
|
Derp Retracted
A) Higher Horsepower does not equal faster. It tends to be that way, but not always. Traction, weight, torque curves, and gear ratios are all part of the 0-60 equation, not just horsepower. This comparison proves nothing other than your stupidity: 2005 V8 Mustang is about 300HP 2005 STI is about 300HP B) Yes, I know that there were no U.S. STi's in 2003. I never asserted that there were. I still don't understand why you keep bringing this up or why you think you "got me". Let me make it clear to you All 2010 and older stock Mustang GTs will get smoked by an STi of any year. This is a fact. This is his entire point. Dank, I'm sorry for derailing your thread.
|
|
|
|
vampire
|
|
August 08, 2012, 07:07:29 PM |
|
Derp Retracted
A) Higher Horsepower does not equal faster. It tends to be that way, but not always. Traction, weight, torque curves, and gear ratios are all part of the 0-60 equation, not just horsepower. This comparison proves nothing other than your stupidity: 2005 V8 Mustang is about 300HP 2005 STI is about 300HP B) Yes, I know that there were no U.S. STi's in 2003. I never asserted that there were. I still don't understand why you keep bringing this up or why you think you "got me". Let me make it clear to you All 2010 and older stock Mustang GTs will get smoked by an STi of any year. This is a fact. This is his entire point. Dank, I'm sorry for derailing your thread. Did you miss my 0-60 results for pre-2012 models? I guess you didnt, since now you're saying pre 2010 and GT.... You're a liar and a moron. LOLOLOOLOL @ at retard. What happened to STI vs Mustang V8?
|
|
|
|
dank (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
August 08, 2012, 07:09:21 PM |
|
No problem, hopefully more people will see my request that one may fulfill.
|
|
|
|
silverbox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
August 08, 2012, 07:15:49 PM |
|
No one is gonna fulfill it till you tell us what kind of car!!
|
|
|
|
dank (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
August 08, 2012, 07:17:14 PM |
|
That's why you have to fulfill it to find out, keep it exclusive.
|
|
|
|
carlos_y
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
August 08, 2012, 07:20:22 PM |
|
I will do it dank, send me PM
|
|
|
|
|