Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 05:31:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What do you think about this POS algorithm?  (Read 626 times)
mczarnek (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 17, 2015, 01:22:28 AM
Last edit: March 17, 2015, 02:14:07 AM by mczarnek
 #1

What do you think about this very simple POS algorithm:

Every block you take the balances of the miners in the last block and have them sign off on the current block.

If 66+% of the miners (measured by stake) sign off on the current block, then the block is accepted.

What issues do you see with this algorithm?  Except of course for the Nothing at stake issue where they are signing multiple blocks.

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
█▄
█████▄
████████▄
███████████▄
██████████████
███████████▀
████████▀
█████▀
█▀












Segwit | Core 0.14 | Masternodes
XEVAN | DK3 | Electrum soon
Bitcore - BTX/BTC -Project












BSD -USDT | Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
Cryptopia | NovaExchange | Livecoin
Litebit.eu | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop













████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
mxa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 17, 2015, 02:31:44 AM
 #2

I can think of some problems immediately: A big part of miners would have to agree on which block to sign. There will always be disagreement about which transactions to include and so on. Also, that would require enough people to have their client open all (so that their coins amount to 66% or more of the total). As more coins get lost, it would become progressively harder (because a bigger part of the coins in circulation) and eventually impossible to get to the 66% required.
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
March 17, 2015, 02:38:38 AM
 #3

https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/452

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
HCLivess
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090


=== NODE IS OK! ==


View Profile WWW
March 17, 2015, 07:02:46 AM
 #4

POS is great, depends on how you set it.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!