Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 12:22:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What is my option for 12.04+ Ubuntu 32bit?  (Read 1075 times)
seriouscoin (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 21, 2015, 05:25:52 PM
 #1

I'm using it for offline wallet. From what i gather so far, only 0.92.3 works for 32bit (Ubuntu 12.04 +  , I plan to run 14.04 LTS 32bit)

What features i'm missing if my online wallet is 0.93.1? or is it fully compatible?

Also can i copy my current blockchain database to the new online wallet (i've heard newest Armory dont use the same database structure...)

Should i get a new pc to run 64bit for next version of offline wallet? or something in the works that can still work with 32bit?

Thanks
zombieslayer9099
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100

Java Coder


View Profile
March 21, 2015, 05:34:38 PM
 #2

Armory's latest build is not compatible with Ubuntu 32 bit at this time.

Did you know there are 1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976 possible bitcoin addresses? To put that into perspective, that's greater than the width of the universe in zeptometers (10^-21 meter).
  ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101: how to avoid scams  ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
March 21, 2015, 06:30:38 PM
 #3

I'm using it for offline wallet. From what i gather so far, only 0.92.3 works for 32bit (Ubuntu 12.04 +  , I plan to run 14.04 LTS 32bit)

What features i'm missing if my online wallet is 0.93.1? or is it fully compatible?

Signing transactions between 0.92.x and 0.93.x versions of Armory works. That was a pretty recent change, it's unlikely to change again soon. 

Also can i copy my current blockchain database to the new online wallet (i've heard newest Armory dont use the same database structure...)

Won't work, but the new version syncs it up very quickly compared to 0.92. Same (or slightly less?) disk space usage.

Should i get a new pc to run 64bit for next version of offline wallet? or something in the works that can still work with 32bit?

Thanks


Lol, no. You can even get the libraries that stop 0.93.x working on Ubuntu 12.04, but I don't think you're gaining anything other than a matching version number. And to get those libraries, you're exposing the offline machine to website downloads, or even worse going online with it to get the backported libraries.

Vires in numeris
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
March 21, 2015, 06:48:01 PM
 #4

I understand,

What are the key features that 0.93 has over the 0.92.3?

  • faster startup (and more reliable)
  • faster shutdown (and more reliable)
  • much faster Database build


Would i miss those features if my offline is 0.92.3 and online is 0.93.1?

No. 0.92 in offline mode doesn't have the problems that 0.93 addresses.

Vires in numeris
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
March 22, 2015, 09:19:51 AM
 #5

What are the key features that 0.93 has over the 0.92.3? Would i miss those features if my offline is 0.92.3 and online is 0.93.1?

I forgot one feature, but it's unlikely you'll need it: deterministic transaction signing. It's for those who feel (or know) they can't trust their Armory device's random number generator, for any number of reasons. It was a brand new feature for 0.93, so it's not well tested considering how new it is. I think mostly everyone can live without it until it's been reviewed. It can't be turned on without using a command line parameter, so don't try looking for the setting in the GUI.

Vires in numeris
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 12:32:59 PM
 #6

[...] And to get those libraries, you're exposing the offline machine to website downloads, or even worse going online with it to get the backported libraries.

Not necessarily. One solution is using Synaptic offline, for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777625.0

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080



View Profile
March 23, 2015, 12:42:53 PM
 #7

[...] And to get those libraries, you're exposing the offline machine to website downloads, or even worse going online with it to get the backported libraries.

Not necessarily. One solution is using Synaptic offline, for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777625.0

It's true, but I don't want to encourage people to do this at all, because of the circumstances. Even if a person was to follow good advice, the risk they could still end up with stolen coins or nuked wallets is too high (for me).

If this wasn't about money (or some other super-valuable data), I'd be telling people to be courageous and give it a try.

Vires in numeris
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!