Bitcoin Forum

OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.

Of course you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.

Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.

Wait... the earth is flat?

Seems you missed a lot of stuff, earth is flat ofc  :-\
People who don't get it like the one below me should probably go back to the middle ages to show their signature(and nope I don't get paid for off-topic posts)

I sincerly hope that nobody really believes this. I just assume these people are trolls.

Are you a rocket scientist?

Gotta be kidding us dude ... the earth is flat ... the Hubble Space Telescope uses fish-eye lens hence why we think its rounded

♫Rocket Man (I Think It's Going To Be A Long Long Time)♫ (http://redirect.jango.com/ad=pid_azlyrics_aid_jangoplayer/www.jango.com/music/ELTON%20JOHN/Rocket%20Man%20(I%20Think%20It's%20Going%20To%20Be%20A%20Long%20Long%20Time))


♫ She packed my bags last night pre-flight
♫ Zero hour nine a.m.
♫ And I'm gonna be high as a kite by then
♫ I miss the earth so much I miss my wife
♫ It's lonely out in space
♫ On such a timeless flight

♫ And I think it's gonna be a long long time
♫ Till touch down brings me round again to find
♫ I'm not the man they think I am at home
♫ Oh no no no I'm a rocket man
♫ Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone

♫ Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids
♫ In fact it's cold as hell
♫ And there's no one there to raise them if you did
♫ And all this science I don't understand
♫ It's just my job five days a week
♫ A rocket man, a rocket man

♫ And I think it's gonna be a long long time...

Trolls don't exist because they need a spherical orb to survive on and the Earth is... well... perhaps not. Ergo, ...

That looks like so much fun.

Allow me to offer up the other two of the trilogy...

"Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield Sings David Bowie's Space Oddity"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apemYk2oz7M

---

Professional actor and singer.

Ever since primitive Man discovered that some rocks are better at bashing things to death than other rocks and wanted to find out why, science has been an important part of human society. Mostly because it led to the invention of better rocks at a time when having good rocks was vital to survival. Sadly, this is no longer the case. In our modern society, people can survive and even prosper despite having a level of scientific ignorance that would embarrass a Neanderthal. This is why we must colonise space: to escape these idiots who are too stupid to even know they can follow us.

http://cdn.thewire.com/media/img/upload/wire/2014/01/13/shutterstock_153272237/lead_large.jpg

Finally, somebody gets it!

All rockets are dumped in the ocean or detonated, total fraud!


http://img.youtube.com/vi/zvMlAqC4bm4/0.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvMlAqC4bm4

OP, may i ask how much you earn per month and how much you would be willing to invest to proof without a doubt (!!) that flat earth is real and everything else a hoax?

There are several methods of doing so depending on how much money you are willing to spend.

Put your money where your mouth is!

This thread is about rockets and fraud. Like the fraud perpetrated on the British taxpayer by the Royal Aircraft Establishment with their BLACK ARROW rocket program in the 1960's.

If there is a god; please god! kill these people.

That is fine no problem.
But don't you want to answer my questions? If you dont want to do it in public you could also send me a pm.

Rockets & fraud or bust dude, there's a thread for Flat Earth Q&A in the off-topic section.

Not sure why you are so passive-aggressive, but you started talking about rocket hoax because of flat earth.

Here is your op

Throwing money at the question of whether the Earth is flat or not isn't going to prove shit. If you want proof just do some research, there's literally hundreds of different proofs that its flat and it wont cost you a dime.

I came here hoping to learn something.. This thread is legit

It is funny that you conclude everything that doesnt support FE as a hoax but if it supports FE it can only be true.

So the idea behind my question is to make your own research (im not talking about watching youtube videos).
But to do so, you have to gather money to start your research.

And yes im talking about real science and research (i.e. building a vehicle to crash against the glass dome/flying over the northpole etc. pp.).
No Youtube.com videos, no URL Links, No Memes.


I can only conclude from your answer that you either have zero money or are scared that FE is just a hoax.

There is no possible argument why we shouldnt gather money to pay for conclusive and accurate proof of FE.
What can you believe more then your own eyes? (funny that you said that yourself several times in the FE thread)

btw. do you mind to post this also on the FE websites and forums on the internet?
maybe we might be able to gather a good chunk and build our own satellite or something?

detonated, into the ocean or just straight up faked:


http://img.youtube.com/vi/BdLDqGo4i84/0.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdLDqGo4i84
"Rocket Fraud by NASA, ROSCOSMOS, ESA, ARIANESPACE ETC."

Turbos prove rockets don't work in space:

http://img.youtube.com/vi/zC87xS2ibME/0.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC87xS2ibME

Bad Troll FAIL !

Al Hazen literally wrote the book on science.. ALL of it.
He wrote the book on scientific procedure.. still used in 100% of all science.
Yup one of those dumb Iraq / middle east towel heads you Americans think are like dumb sand people.
Some of Hazen's work was based off Chinese books that were burned 100's of yrs earlier
as well as Greek works long lost burned etc.
The middle eastern guys saved science and brought it forth !

Science proved Earth was round.
It was built from layers of facts.. often elementary deduction which is usually* accurate.
Such as how we deduced there is a Super Massive black hole 26,000 light years away
at the center of our Galaxy ..like most others..
In a similar method we also recently learned we almost certainly have a REAL 9th Planet.
And ironically it was Brown who figured it out ROFL
Pluto used to be the 9th but was down graded to Dwarf when Brown found Eris
(he wanted to call Eris Xena from the Warrior Princess show infamy)
Since we found another.. like Pluto called Sedna.
BUT !
While i was talking with a guy about the strong evidence of Nemesis being a very real possibility..
He informed me that a new Planet was making News all over.. see story at www.Space.com etc.
I find it funny that it sort of coincides with the Nemesis 2nd Sun theory
and of course the scheduled bombardment that wipes out life on earth time after time on a schedule.
Some believe we have 2 Stars.. the 2nd is further out on a long orbit and is a Dwarf.
Which is more common than single star systems it's often said.. so plausible *enough.
And now this new planet news is just too coincidental !

Although i think it's possible Dark matter is just a math mistake.
And i also think the Standard Candle theory that chick figured out a 100 years ago is likely highly inaccurate.
It's based on brightness but Variable stars.. well.. vary ROFL
I have my own theories i have worked on for years on those two issues as well as Dark energy.
One thing that has to be remember is Einstein's theories.. matter can not be destroyed ?
So how can a black hole destroy it ?
it can't !
It is transformed from one form to another in a black hole.. as the laws dictate !
All the energy and matter that exists is here today now.. there will never be more or less.
It simply shifts around moving from one phase to another.. based on Entropy.
Entropy a theory some scientists think is proof that Gravity is not actually a fundamental force.
Which also explains why Gravitons were never found.
Gravity has shown to be like heat and heat is entropy.
A hot air balloon for example..

What is all that about ?
Our science is utterly ripping to shreds all our old beliefs ..what we thought was facts previously.
But it's based on building up facts on facts.. not starting over.

IS the Universe flat ? maybe but i doubt it.. Earth sure ain't !
Many say we could have a limitless universe.. based on our view
at the limit to our view may be another long duration until you reach another limit of view and so on..

According to COINTELPRO Sputnik's & Criptix's posts falls under Technique #3 - 'TOPIC DILUTION'. Criptix's posts go even further and venture into Technique #4 - 'INFORMATION COLLECTION' and even Technique #5 - 'ANGER TROLLING' with the reference to money.

Reference:

"Cointelpro Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum" -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1319384.0

Special agent criptix here xD ;D

I was really trying to help you and your FE friends, but the sad truth is that you are nuts...
Instead of trying to prove flat earth you are saying im a .gov agent who tries to manipulate you and this forum - seriously?

Good faith my ass...

This rocket rabbit hole gets more and more convoluted the deeper it goes:

http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/v1-and-v2-rockets-hoax/

https://i.imgur.com/zZ9WLKX.jpg

What is the mystery ?
Rockets work in our atmosphere as intended..
If you can do a push-up off your floor then rockets work as stated ;)

I forgive you for not following my long winded train of thought earlier.. i did veer off the rails a bit ;)
But i made two points..
- "Layers" of Info / Facts.
- Our Knowledge is fluid and is constantly changing.

@Gleb
i loved the Goatse Rocket ROFL
Years ago i went into the den of wolves and mocked the group of guys who made that famous pic.
the infamous "Myg0t" Counter-Strike Cheater "Clan"
I had regged on their forum and they decided to all get lippy with me
after i mentioned who i was about (12 years earlier)
They dove on me pretty hard mouthing me off pretending to now know who i was..
Then i posted a PM from one of the Clan member Leaders who had PM'd me at CS.Rin.Ru forums
asking me for private Steam cracks ..to support their Cheating with Aimbots + Wall hacks.
I found it funny they were sitting their lipping me off playing dumb
while privately sucking my cock with praise begging for cracks via PM on another site.

I called them all out and laid them on their ass and had the Legendary TROLL Clan in tears. hahhaha
ON THEIR FORUMS !
I laughed in their face for crying like bitches ROFL
Me vs. the whole fucking Forum Clan and i owned their fucking ass HARD !
Same guys who made the Goatse.jpeg image as a SPRAY for counter-strike ROFL
I laughed at all the fucking faggots..
Reminded them that they are all 14 yr old little shits who downloaded lame code from their one leader who
makes their cheats (precompiled for Windows noobs) "Aimbot.exe" or "No Walls.exe"
Then i pointed out how their members were required to bake a cake with the word "Myg0t"
in icing on the top of the cake.. (which was available for viewing to the public)
Called them a bunch of pussy 14yr old cake baking noobs with downloaded aimbot hacks
and then mocked their leader for blowing me while begging for STEAM CRACKS via PM
Slapped the fuck out of them all laughed in their face obnoxious until they were almost in tears
then reminded them of their GRAND slogan.. The internet's toughest Trolls etc etc
Meanwhile i was getting "Don't feed the troll" replies from the KING of Trolls on the web ROFL !
That was FUN !  8)
The whole cheater clan of fags are not even in the same league as me combined..

OP:
You are TROLL FAIL kid ;)
You're doin' it wrong LOL

PS:
I am a "Rocket Doctor" ..that is better !

There are videos on youtube, with things that you can test yourself - a gopro camera strapped to an atmospheric baloon which goes up for some kilometers and you can see the shape of the planet - jeez. Why doesn't the earth have a cubical shape? What will they come up with next?

**Sigh** I was really hoping this thread would be about rockets and rocketry as the there are already a half dozen flat earth threads going on the subject.

In any case what gopro lens correction software would you recommend for use with footage obtained form said balloon experiment?

I've found the following application on iTunes but I'm not sure if it's the best one to use.

https://i.imgur.com/Mohc88j.png
Source: https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/lens-corrector-for-gopro/id671003914?mt=8

---

Iron Man Elon Musk and the SpaceX Front Company Hoax



https://i.imgur.com/cijjJPH.jpg



“   Musk is the wealthiest man in LA, a geeky humanitarian billionaire boy-genius character and ardent supporter of the Evil Empire known as the Military-Industrial-Complex. NASA is beyond confirmed as a total hoax/front company – so what is SpaceX actually doing? Will they finally be able to show us the first non-CGI image of Earth in history? Don’t hold your breath.

---

Read more: https://extracapsa.wordpress.com/2015/12/22/elon-musk-and-the-space-x-front-company/

OK, so you're saying you don't believe in conservation of momentum, correct? You do realize this is a law of physics and subsequently has never been proven wrong in the history of mankind?

There seems to be an issue with rockets exploding or falling into the ocean.

Rockets sometimes do that, turns out it's not as easy as you might think to shoot a rocket into orbit. It would be far more suspicious if rockets bound for orbit had a 100% success rate.

Back to your original assertion, which was that rockets don't work in a vacuum. You're wrong.
You don't even need a vacuum chamber to test this, here's a simple experiment that you can do at home to prove conservation of momentum.

Put yourself in a state of low friction, for example sit in a chair with wheels or stand on a skateboard. Now, pick up a heavy object, and throw it away from you. You will move in the opposite way to the object. This is primary school level physics.

In this analogy, you are the rocket and the object you threw is the rocket fuel. Now, you might think that this only works because the object is pushing off the air or some such bullshit. Well then, why not try it with a much lighter object of the same volume, such as a balloon. You will see that if you throw an gas filled balloon in the same way, you will barely move at all.

Congratulations, you just proved a fundamental law of physics, and subsequently that rockets certainly can work in a vacuum!

Have you ever seen the trick where the magician pulls the tablecloth out from under a set table? He uses inertia to hold the objects in place and never overcomes the minimum threshold required to move the objects. The mass emitted from a rocket isn't enough to overcome that minimum threshold. The synthesis here is that thrust comes from air pressure.

if you r rocket scientist you should need to study more and more and more.Then you will clear your points automatically. 

This post belongs here.

I wish i was a Rocket Doctor myself :(

I don't believe the OP here.. he is Trolling on us all !

NASA Fail Compilation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msY3xc8pVLE)
https://planetruthblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/shuttle-launches.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msY3xc8pVLE)

The only thing that NASA has ever sent to space is your imagination.

Rockets don't depend on atmosphere to push against, although some toy rockets (like released balloons) might a little. Rather, they work on the principle of inertia.

If you are standing on a smooth sheet of ice in the winter, and a friend is standing next to you, if you push against your friend, you both move in opposite directions on the slippery ice. This happens because of inertia.

In a rocket in a vacuum, the fuel has weight. It has inertia, the tendency for it to remain in whatever motion it is going. Then, the fuel is exploded in the rocket engine in a controlled explosion. Because of its inertia, and the sudden change by the explosion in the engine, it pushes the rocket ahead. This action is like when you push your friend on the ice. Both of you move in opposite directions, sliding on the ice.

The rocket moves one way while the spent fuel moves the other way. The rocket engine pushes against the tendency of the rocket fuel to remain unmoving. The explosion is rapid enough that this can happen. Atmosphere is a hindrance more than it is a help.

8)

After seeing that pic I just had a flashback of Moonraker.

I think that's the main idea  ;)

You Only Live Twice

8)

True Story...

I was reading the forum thread titles real fast and thought the title read "Racist Scientist" and I clicked expecting something really interesting.

What? You are a racist against rocket people?    ;D

https://i.imgur.com/0UTuIsQ.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

A picture is worth a thousand words. Then Adobe developed Photoshop, and some folks used it to start the flat earth religion. Now a picture is worth little or nothing, 'cause anybody can make any picture they want.

8)

A rocket scientist who doesn't know the difference between coarse and course. Hold on let me consult google so I may also sound like an expert on the matter.

Where does space start?

Most jet planes don't fly above 15km (9.5 miles, 50,000ft), where there's still enough oxygen to burn fuel in their engines and keep them flying, but that's nowhere near the start of space. Space is generally defined as starting at about 100km (60 miles) above Earth (an arbitrary point sometimes called the Kármán line), which is where conventional planes would struggle to make enough lift to stay in the air. That doesn't mean Earth's atmosphere is all done and dusted by that point; far from it! The lowest satellites (known as low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites) fly at heights above 160km or 100 miles from Earth, which is over 10 times higher than planes fly. Even so, they still feel some drag (aerodynamic resistance) from the outer reaches of our atmosphere, which fizzles on up to 800km (500 miles) or higher.

You might think space is a long way away, but a hundred kilometers is not so far: a car, hurtling along at highway speed, would take just an hour to get you there; a rocket will get there about 20 times faster—in just 3 minutes.

What is space like?

From the point of someone designing a rocket, space is the place effectively beyond Earth's reach—beyond most of its gravity and atmosphere. Although we tend to think of it as a vacuum, it's not completely empty. There's radiation zipping through it (there must be—how else would we see all those distant stars and planets?), meteorites nipping past, "cosmic dust," and even bits of space junk (broken bits of satellites and rockets). Perhaps the best way to think of space is as a place of wild extremes: emptiness, weightlessness (when you're far from any planets). One minute, deep darkness and extreme cold (when you're shaded from the sun); the next, blinding light, dangerous cosmic radiation, and extreme heat.

Is there more than one kind of space?

Mostly we're interested in the interplanetary space of our own Solar System (the area round the Sun), which is measured in distances of millions of kilometers. But space telescopes and unmanned probes also study the further reaches of what's called interstellar space (the space between stars), measured in vastly greater distances called light years (the distance light travels in one year, which is almost 10 trillion kilometers). The Milky Way galaxy, of which our solar system is just one part, measures about 100,000 light years (1 million, million, million km) across.

Space, if you haven't figured it out already, is a pretty big place!

#YoFam

^ Thanks for the tip (corrected), good thing I'm a rocket scientist and not an English teacher.



There's an area up there where they hang things called "satellites" from weather balloons. This is as close to "outer-space" as it gets, everything else is a lie or a hoax.

Official 2002 NASA image of "Blue Marble v2.0"

https://i.imgur.com/YKkSX9y.jpg

...featuring Photoshop 6.0  :D

https://i.imgur.com/D1VmBkm.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/3uNN1fU.jpg

Fuck all of you masonic retards. Your day of reckoning is fast approaching.

You guys are joking, seriously. How can you tell me space does not exist, look up the sky at night, see the stars and tell me where they are located - somewhere in the clouds? ::)

There's a nickel-iron steel dome with a reflective golden oxide coating on it several thousand miles above our heads. The stars are small lights that circle within the dome.

It's very strange topic, cause when i started read it, it was funny but i am here for 2 mins and i have terrible headache, cause i'm reading bullshit ;D

Wanna see flat-earth funny? Look here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg15894139#msg15894139.

8)

Please be specific, what exactly is bullshit?


I claim:

1. Rockets don't work in a vacuum.

2. All rockets are either detonated or land in the ocean.

3. Outer-space is a lie/hoax.

4. SpaceX is fraud and Elon MUSK is a liar.

No we are not joking, seriously.

"The stars are attached to the firmament." - Nikola Tesla

NASA has NEVER sent one of their masonic cock-rockets past the firmament. EVER.

"Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement."

It's all based on psychopathic zionist / jesuit / freemason occult luciferian spellcraft and numerology.

These same creeps have been in control of science, education, media, industry, religion, government, and military of every country on earth for centuries.

They have NO REASON to tell you the truth about ANYTHING, and EVERY REASON NOT TO.

If you want to know more, you MUST do your own research.

Don't simply take someone's word for something and accept it as a truth; you need to figure it all out for YOURSELF.

Research, research, research. Never stop.

Here's a good place to start looking for things to research on your own:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=space+is+fake (about 8,140,000 vids)

Happy hunting  :)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+moon+landings+-+moon+landing+hoax+-+apollo+astronauts+staging+moon+orbithttps://i.imgur.com/0PIwcIs.jpg (http://)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+moon+landings+-+moon+landing+hoax+-+apollo+astronauts+staging+moon+orbit

How really dense are you guys? Don't you realize that neither NASA nor any other company is going to show you the actual films of something they were doing when they were not sure of what was going to happen?

You children needed to see something back then. So they filmed a "movie" of a moon landing so you could see. They aren't dumb enough to show you the whole actual process while it is happening.

What do you think commercials on TV are? All kinds of companies show you what they want you to see, for advertising purposes. Wake up.

You see ads on TV for products. You almost never see the process by which the product is made or shipped, or the accounting people in the home offices doing their job, or any of the behind-the-scenes operations. Companies don't show that stuff. But the product is real. It comes from somewhere, doesn't it?

Wake up and realize, now that you know the truth about the NASA pictures, that they really did this stuff, and that the pictures are simply their advertising campaign, not the actual pictures of what really happened.

8)

Watch Gorgeous New Footage Of SpaceX's Falcon 9 Rocket Launches (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/201860-2016-08-11-watch-gorgeous-new-footage-of-spacexs-falcon-9-rocket-launches.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/522-0811153735-index.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/201860-2016-08-11-watch-gorgeous-new-footage-of-spacexs-falcon-9-rocket-launches.htm)




High Speed Footage | Past Missions
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DKqY8sy3nkM/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=336&h=188&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=nIeMKRwmLvqE6sa3_B4MQRtf1uU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKqY8sy3nkM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKqY8sy3nkM)


Read more at http://www.popsci.com/watch-new-footage-spacexs-falcon-9-rockets-launching. (http://www.popsci.com/watch-new-footage-spacexs-falcon-9-rockets-launching)


8)

https://i.imgur.com/lV0pezh.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=satellites+do+not+exist)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=satellites+do+not+exist

Tsk, tsk. You really do have your problems, don't you.

The Nigerian email scammers liked the results they were getting. So, after they made a ton of money in their emails campaign, they started this flat earth stuff just to see if they could turn their emailing into a science. The NSA got wind of the Nigerians' program, and stole it from them. And now you still don't realize that all this flat earth stuff is the NSA attempting to find out how long it takes for people to be overcome by garbage, after certain amounts of chemtrail materials are sprayed on them. Didn't take them long to suck you in, right?

 ;D

lol - because fuck GPS, it must work on hugs.

No hugs. Just ground-based technology. THERE ARE NO SATELLITES IN "SPACE".

Aw sorry, no troll biscuit for you, buddy. Nice try though  :D

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gps+is+ground+based

https://i.imgur.com/7LPvR5F.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gps+is+ground+based)

Of course satellites exist. If you can push this flat earth stuff hard enough to help the NSA take over the world, you might even be offered a position of satellite in their one-world government.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/Gr11JZE.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=satellites+do+not+exist+space+is+fake)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=satellites+do+not+exist+space+is+fake

People would rather that flawed rockets fall into the sea than onto their city. That's why many launches are over water rather than over cities. The successful launches often go into orbit around the planet, and the satellites that are up there remain there for many years.

8)

That's because rockets are never meant go to space.

They are simply guided missiles that are either detonated to explode out of sight, or they crash in the ocean, somewhere out of sight.

There is never anyone aboard any of these rockets. It's a massive scam involving every country / government that has a space program.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+rockets

https://i.imgur.com/fNpCd0L.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+rockets)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+rockets

You are pretty shrewd, nomad13666. You looked like you were against rocket scientists. Then you started doing all this goofy stuff, showing how goofy people who are against rocket scientists really are. Now we are beginning to see that you were really a mole, pretending to be anti-rocket-scientist, but really in favor of them. Keep up the good work.

8)

Thanks again, nomad13666, for helping to prove that NASA rocket scientists know what rocket science is all about.

8)

Dude, is he so toxic?  ;D

It's a religion thing with nomad13666. When you show someone that his religion is wrong, he gets all upset. If his science weren't a religion to him, he'd be able to treat it as science, and either learn, or else prove it wrong.

8)

Yes dude, stupidity is very toxic.

That's why it has its own thread, here. You wouldn't want to stick flat earth stupidity with globular earth reality.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/hAJT7kg.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=spacex+fake)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=spacex+fake

Thanks again, nomad13666, for helping to prove that NASA rocket scientists know what rocket science is all about.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/6q3jr4Z.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nasa+lies)

Don't be a BADecker.

RESEARCH NASA'S LIES.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nasa+lies

You think that's^^ bad. Look at this!


Human as Spaceship
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1608/HumanSpaceship2_TsevisHubbleRJN_2000.jpg
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap160815.html (http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap160815.html)





This doesn't have anything to do with rockets or rocket scientists. This has to do with NASA advertising. True rocketry is accurate the way NASA and many others explain it.


8)

https://i.imgur.com/hhgjBQ0.jpg

 :-*

Broken record, right?

Thanks again for helping to prove that standard rocketry is accurate, simply by your ignorance.

    8)

https://i.imgur.com/nO0zQxA.jpg

 :-*

https://i.imgur.com/HWAIrDG.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockets+are+fake+nobody+goes+to+space)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockets+are+fake+nobody+goes+to+space

You are just upset because they would never want to take somebody like you along, right?

 ;)

https://i.imgur.com/XtWmzCl.jpg

 :-*

https://i.imgur.com/RLTUwsU.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=space+is+fake+nasa+lies)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=space+is+fake+nasa+lies

Just see what people doing here  ;D

https://i.imgur.com/akGKcPS.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb76B0XQpZc)

History of Space Suits - 1960's Space Suits - LMFAO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb76B0XQpZc

What a crock of shit. NOBODY goes to "space". Fuck NASA.

How can you tell me space does not exist, look up the sky at night, see the stars and tell me where they are located - somewhere in the clouds? Telescope buy

You will never convince the flat earthers with this idea. They think that the stars are LED lights, or something, that are imbedded in the dome that covers the earth, and that shine down on us when the big hanging "dark thing" that hides the hanging sun spotlight at night, does its hiding job.

8)

No no no.. Stars are just pinholes in the curtain of night.

Yes, but, you can find all kinds of variations of flat earthers that believe all kinds of things. Some of them might not believe in a dome at all. Others might believe that the flat earth extends infinitely in all directions.

8)

Yes I know. Its a phenomenon. Just like the 9/11 theories, first we had in plane sight, I kinda liked that one. Then the cockroaches came out of the woodwork with their own theories like that energy weapons bitch or the no planers or the .. I'm sure there are more. I just can't remember them all it was a while ago.

Anyhow we both know the earth isn't flat and all of their theories are instantly debunked with you just look at that horizon, that beautiful and telling horizon.

Yeah. I particularly like that 9/11 conspiracy theory that says some Arab Muslims did it.

8)

Nomad you have this strange fascination with cocks. You draw them, make memes with them and probably suck on them daily.  :P

I guess when you have to live with the fact that there is a horizon and no amount of flat urth science is gonna change that then well.. gotta suck cocks..

https://i.imgur.com/DwCgA7u.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8C0mStHdV0)

Balls Out Physics Episode 5.0: Propulsion in Space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8C0mStHdV0

Why does a gun kick when fired? It is all about the principles of inertia of the bullet. The molecules of exploding gasses in a rocket engine are like little bullets. They kick against their gun, the rocket engine, thereby propelling the rocket away from them, just like the gun is propelled away from the bullet.

8)

Our Closest Neighboring Star Has A Rocky, Earth-Sized Planet In Its Habitable Zone (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/202585-2016-08-24-our-closest-neighboring-star-has-a-rocky-earth-sized-planet.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/522-0824142235-eso1629e.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/202585-2016-08-24-our-closest-neighboring-star-has-a-rocky-earth-sized-planet.htm)




The exoplanet next door
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aOTWo6_602Q/hqdefault.jpg?custom=true&w=196&h=110&stc=true&jpg444=true&jpgq=90&sp=68&sigh=P2Oskb6k3WLJuXEOQ1dDQiVy2fQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOTWo6_602Q (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOTWo6_602Q)


Read more at http://www.popsci.com/our-closest-star-has-earth-sized-planet-located-right-in-habitable-zone. (http://www.popsci.com/our-closest-star-has-earth-sized-planet-located-right-in-habitable-zone)


8)

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zvMlAqC4bm4/hqdefault.jpg (http://)

NO ROCKETS EVER GO TO SPACE
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=no+rockets+ever+go+to+space

All this stuff you don't understand. How do we know you don't understand it? You keep on pointing to videos, which don't explain it either.

These videos are simply conditioning into stupidity. You should change your handle to "mostlymad" instead of nomad13666.

8)

Hey, man! Thanks again for showing us, in yourself, the kind of people who believe the earth is flat. You ain't got no credibility at all! And neither does your false rocket science.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/Otni0w1.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks0ezrHBhzI)

Rockets Do Not Go To Space - Audio of Eyewitness Account
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks0ezrHBhzI

PS; eat shit BADecker, you fucking troll.

Poor little nomad13666. Can't take it, can you, when real logic overruns your comedy of errors.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/RzFYCTW.jpg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606430.0)

Beat it, clown.

Poll: Is BADecker a paid troll or just a simple idiot?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606430.0

https://i.imgur.com/Y5pA018.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+rockets+hoax+nasa+lies)

Research Fake Rockets Hoax - NASA lies:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fake+rockets+hoax+nasa+lies

https://i.imgur.com/hzwXsXH.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22space+is+fake%22)

BADecker is a joke. Mental illness is not.
Don't be a BADecker. Seek help before it's too late.

--------------------------------------------------------
Poll: Is user BADecker a paid troll, or just a simple idiot?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606430
--------------------------------------------------------

That's okay. You can have your mental illness, and your rocket science. It's keeping you distracted while the world moves on to new horizons. Wouldn't want you out there contaminating reality, anyway.

8)

Do not operate the engine because there is no oxygen, but the fact that the missiles are equipped with a fuel and oxygen for combustion. A rocket will move enertsii is born due to the push from the combustion of fuel.

To answer this question it is necessary to examine first what a vacuum. As I understand it is the complete absence of air. But why the missile can not work under these conditions?

A rocket needs a pressurized atmosphere to push against and this doesn't work in a vacuum environment. The following video on automotive turbos does a good job of explaining the pressure concepts involved:

Rocket propulsion works entirely on the principle of inertia... the inertia of the exploding fuel trying to remain moving at the same pace as the rocket but being forced to move with explosive-like force in the opposite direction by its exploding action... and the rocket being forced in the opposite direction of the exploding fuel against its own inertia. The inertia of the exploding fuel wins.

Once in a while the fuel is ignited in too rapid of an explosion, and the rocket engine explodes. This is rare, now days, because rocket science has become a real art.

8)

A day is less than 24 hours, gyroscopes don't possess the property of rigidity in space and now ignited rocket fuel doesn't create any pressure. What fascinating new aspect of science will we learn about tomorrow so that the Sun will keep rising and Earth will keep spinning?

Tomorrow? We just learned today why you never got off the ground.    8)

http://img.youtube.com/vi/_tGc9PClSvE/0.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tGc9PClSvE)


Team NASA or Team NADA? NASA is a fraud- Fake Launches
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tGc9PClSvE

Do you watch TV? Close to 100% of everything you see on TV is fraudulent. But the companies and people behind it all are real. They are way too smart to show you the real way they do the things they do. After all, look at what you would do if they showed you the proof. Same as you are doing right now.

8)

So many mysteries around NASA, and the money they are eating a huge amount of byudzheta country. Maybe it's because the money is washed.

Is this still about that flat earth crap? You know that's just a lie that the undercover government spies tell you to hide the REAL truth, right?

The Earth is actually a cube!

No, it's a table with a roulette wheel in it. Spin the wheel and guess which form of flat earth is going to come up next.    ;D


https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fd6IeEcC.jpg&t=568&c=X0SV1flZWYuWHA


8)

I'm probably in the school I am very much missed by geography. Mom told me that I would be a fool would not know, and more. Now here is a question that interests me, whether I am a fool.

How many years we have been told that mankind was on the moon. But recently things have changed. Why 40 years and no one is flying to the moon, it's not expensive to fly. It seems to me that something was indeed found there, and that there are concerns.

Spreken ze English? neletaetnalunu nashil

8)

Excuse me. I corrected.

I just can not understand why people cheat. What is the use of it. If you keep the neutrality, then let still some land, but what are the reasons to prove the opposite to each other.

I already posted a simple experiment that you can do at home which proves you wrong, in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1217246.msg13876352#msg13876352 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1217246.msg13876352#msg13876352)

Have you tried it yet or are you too close-minded to even attempt to prove yourself wrong?

Also you don't understand how turbos work if you think they disprove rocket thrust in a vacuum.

There probably is something there. The Revelation in the Bible tells about the great dragon - the devil, Satan - and his angels/demons being flung to the earth. If they were sent to the earth so they couldn't get back up there, they must have left some evidence of themselves behind.

The New Testament tells us that the world is under the control of the devil... except for the people who believe in Jesus salvation, that is. The devil is trying to get back into the "sky" to retrieve some of his forces and equipment that are still up there. This is why we have a space program. It is also why there is a flat earth propaganda program.

The devil wants to get back to some of his equipment up there, to try to re-ignite the war with God, and maybe win this time. He is using mankind to do it for him, in the form of NASA and some of the space programs of the other countries.

But, he doesn't want all of mankind to know about his equipment up there. So, he is creating the flat earth propaganda machine to hide the fact of space, so that his equipment will remain as completely hidden as possible.

NASA will still go to the moon and beyond. They will still retrieve the devil's weapons for him. It's just that the majority of us will never know it once flat earth becomes the popular thing.

8)

http://img.youtube.com/vi/keYLZZlvjQs/hqdefault.jpg



NASA Office in space -- https://youtu.be/keYLZZlvjQs



QNFee (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq8WOX8u_xjghg_oe3l_LrQ)

https://i.imgur.com/DbWChkV.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcei5478Njg)

Welcome to Nasa's SuperBall Fantasy Land
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcei5478Njg

Welcome to a thread started by jokers who don't understand rocket science.

8)

https://i.imgur.com/bORIoVY.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI)

Apollo Moon Hoax - Puppet on a String
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

"... NASA has changed the astrological signs, because apparently science informs the placement of stars. ..."

http://www.thefrisky.com/2016-09-16/nasa-just-changed-all-the-astrological-signs-in-case-yall-forgot-who-runs-the-star-game/

Look at these flat earth jokers. Here we are in a thread that talks about rocket science, and all they can do is pick on NASA. What a bunch of retarded jokers.

No offense, you flat earth jokers. You can't help the way you are. Just the same, it is best to point it out to the rest of the readers.


8)

Here is how goofy you jokers are, that think that rockets are propelled by force against the atmosphere.

Go outside and lift your hand above your head. Then, push your hand down as low as you can get it. Did you lift yourself of the ground at all? Do it with both hands as fast as you can. Did you lift yourself up even a little by pushing against the air?

Why would you think that a rocket could lift itself by pushing against the atmosphere? After all, rocket thrust doesn't even have the solidity of your hand. Rocket thrust is just like the atmosphere... a gas. So, it is air pushing against air. Nothing happens if this is the way it is supposed to work.

Rocket propulsion doesn't have anything to do with something pushing against the air, especially when it is other "air." You jokers really need to go back to school.

8)

Everybody here speaks the truth, apart from the indoctrinated

EWIGE BLUMENKRAFT & HAIL ERIS


now I'm gonna use my imagination to create a new electronic component, but since then the current system is flawed then, I also need to invent 3 new units in 'psysicks' because 2 x 4 = 8 and otherwise it is not.

Now the real problem which devided the world I suppose was when some mathematical dude smoked some pot and was like: "what if i^2 = -1" and modern electronics as we know it today came to earth

Now I'm as a artist is mad at the whole world, because of this bullshit, I'm stuck with a dB scale for analog audio equipment and a different one for digital equipment.

So when these morons entered earth sound wasn't sound anymore, or it was the same - though different.

The funny thing is that the analog dB scale can get above 0 dB, while the digital one can't.

This is due to the fact that digital bullshit has not anything to do with life, it's a fake protocol. I mean a real protocol, with an army of sheeple looking through a tube, à it's called youtube (and schoolbooks)

So if you really think you're that superior because you suppose earth is round (I agree on that one, though I don't care that much), so if you're really so superior to me ERIS, explain to me why you have to react like a 'fnording' bishop, only because there is some 'fnording' kinds running around in your CHURCH

IF YOU CAN'T

SIMPLY ACCEPT that science is just some ''abstract'' form of acting flambojent, AND that technology is indeed a really real thing

ERIS, it's time to awake and for the world to unite, not to be forced to unite (like history repeats itself, it will and only change)

Do you even read GOD's Word? Apparently not. Too busy posting here.

It clearly states that moon is a light. Not an object you could land on. Get sober man.

Gen 1:14  And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
Gen 1:15  And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:16  And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

Mat 24:29  Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

The God of the bible is an idiot. Created the plants before the sun. Didn't know that the moon isn't a light and so on
Sounds like a iron age sheep hearder made this bull up..
Oh whait. They did

https://i.imgur.com/4dJpUiW.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockets+are+fake)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rockets+are+fake

But it worked for God. You and I can't even hang onto our own lives in the face of strong disaster... to say nothing about not being able to create anything other than some abstract silliness.

8)

Do you even read what your post says rather than reading into it what you want? The parts of Genesis you quoted say nothing about the sun and the moon. Other places in Scripture suggest that this is talking about God the Father and Jesus.

The moon is a light, and now we know how it works. The sun is a light as well, and now we know that it works through electric plasma.

8)

If you know how the sun works, but it still kills you tomorrow, what is the use of it? ( and how good do you know it ). I know that if a person don't get food and water, that person will die sooner or later - though - it seems unfair to claim great human knowlege because of that

Generally speaking, gaining food comes by planting and harvesting, and water by digging a well or filling your jug at the river. It generally doesn't have anything to do with rocket science.

Some of the knowledge about the sun comes through rocket science, because rockets have been used to send out probes that have gathered more information about the sun than we can get directly by observation from here on earth.

If you eat the wrong food, or if the food is spoiled, or if the water you drink is poisoned, or if it has bad microbes in it, you can die from food and water. Improperly built rockets can kill people as well. Few people die from the sun, because most know that they need to take enough water along with them through the desert.

What are you talking about?

8)

Atleast you're sure to keep your sunglasses on :-*

Sunglasses are a wise thing at times. The sun is very bright. As people get older, cataracts form in their eyes if the pupils in their eyes lose some of their sensitivity. Cataracts are protection for the sensitive nerves of the retina if the pupils don't limit the light properly.

Sunglasses can keep cataracts from forming as rapidly. This means that older people will not have such "thick" cataracts, and they will be able to see in the dark better. So, sunglasses are a good thing.

What do sunglasses have to do with rocket science? Why did you bring it up?

8)

So why did he think the moon is a light if he is all knowing?
Sounds more like iron age mind set
he created the thing, and don't even know what it is?

Just so that you know something...

You don't know what God thinks. The evidence for this is that you don't know much of anything else, either.

8)

So far it looks like he doesn't think. The moon is a light  :D
The guy must be braindead or made up from a iron age brain  :D

How much does the moon weigh? The moon isn't a light. It's a "heavy."    8)

Bullshit and you know it.
The moon is not a light

Are you stupid or unable to read? Let's try one more time:

Gen 1:14  And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
Gen 1:15  And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:16  And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
Gen 1:17  And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
Gen 1:18  And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

The Creator of all saw that it was good, so who are you little man, to dictate what is good and what is not.

Re-dictate.    8)

You forgot the words that Jesus spoke? He said that the need to give God something that he needs, and to give to Caesar what belongs to him.

Just like Satan. Always twisting God's words. Jesus didn't say to give God something that He needs. Jesus said to give to God what God already owns: “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”

8)

God does not own souls. He needs them. It requires people to choose their own path and those who believe, give the soul to God. As well as the money is not Caesar's. They gained people.

God doesn't need souls. He is not just a little bit God. He is God Almighty, way beyond understanding. His ways are limitless. If all souls were suddenly gone, He would simply find the next of an infinite number of ways available to Him to get what He wants.

We, the souls, need God. We can't sustain ourselves. We need God to do it for us. God in His love is willing, if we are willing.

All things belong to God because He created it all. He gives us all things including money. Giving some money back to God is an opportunity for us to show our gratitude to Him. He doesn't need it. He can create all the gold and silver that He wants.

Give to God what already belongs to God. Give to other people whatever belongs to them.

8)

+1  ;)

http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/10-26.htm (http://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/10-26.htm)

Possibly that's an answer as to why "they" try to hide God, this is a massive property theft. The firmament/dome is proof the Earth was created by an engineer, architect and builder of significant stature.



https://i.imgur.com/gyTNpxb.jpg
Quote: http://biblehub.com/psalms/19-1.htm

The so-called Biblical dome is an understanding for simple people.

Modern people have pride because they think they have accomplished so much.

This pride is shown by modern flat earthers who proudly think that they finally found the truth by applying literalism to the Bible, when it is way more complex than that.

Flat earthers are simple people who proudly think that they understand what is going on. So let them remain as the simpletons that they are showing themselves to be in their pride.

8)

The dream of human flight to the planet Mars has a long history, but now we come to the realization of this dream. Scientists are working on a missile and an opportunity to live in another planet.

Aha, a follower or a fan of man bill hick. And I do not care for his deluded opinions. Poor little guy.

You know that bill hick replaced real alex jones do you? So now fake alex jones is bill hick. Take your lesson:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJzHRJmwKOs (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJzHRJmwKOs)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rM2re61BH4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rM2re61BH4)

PS: It is interesting that Napoleon once said: people will believe anything as long as it is not in the Word of God.

And they will even believe flat earth is in the Word, even though the flat earth description can not be a flat-earth proven thing at all, since the earth is globular.

8)

LOL badecker, you must always "mess" around. Aren't you happy without that?

EDIT: and thanks for proclaiming flat earth truth  8)

What are you talking about? We all mess around, as the world turns.

8)

That guy was a Nazi, why is there US flags showing pride to the Nazi? Is it for he allowed the us to scam the whole world?

CEO and founder of SpaceX Elon Musk on the IAC conference spoke about the plans for the colonization of Mars. So soon we fly to Mars and thus we will conquer space.

https://i.imgur.com/zMGh4h8.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mars+hoax+elon+musk+is+a+liar)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=mars+hoax+elon+musk+is+a+fucking+liar

This is generally the interesting thing. Perhaps if you visit Mars, it will give the opportunity to feed the hungry. As the saying goes, you never know.

Auguste PICCARD was a professor and scientist at ULB in Brussels:

What's the matter? Can't stick to rocketry because you know that you don't really know anything about it?

8)

http://img.youtube.com/vi/dhYfw4Iy9WA/0.jpg (https://youtu.be/dhYfw4Iy9WA)

Nasa Moon Landing Hoax discussed on FOX (https://youtu.be/dhYfw4Iy9WA)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhYfw4Iy9WA

http://img.youtube.com/vi/q4t4fjYkWc8/hqdefault.jpg (https://youtu.be/q4t4fjYkWc8)

The 1986 Challenger Crew Conspiracy Theory (https://youtu.be/q4t4fjYkWc8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4t4fjYkWc8

lol arevyou take it that education or not than you are free, Chemical rocket engines, liquid fuel, solid fuel and hybrid rocket engines. Liquid propellant rocket motors are rocket motors that generate propellant by accelerating the combustion of the liquid fuel fed into the combustion chamber and the resulting hot gases resulting from the combustion reaction of the oxidizer. The fuel must be pressurized or the fuel from the fuel tanks must be directed to the combustion chamber by a pump so that the fuel can be fed into the combustion chamber. Solid fuel rocket engines are rocket engines that generate propulsion by accelerating the output of a fuel / oxidizer-containing fuel / rubber-like fuel core to a nozzle. Unlike liquid fuel rocket engines, are systems that do not require a pressure tank or pump to feed fuel to the combustion chamber. Hybrid rocket engines can be thought of as a mixture of solid fuel rocket motor and liquid fuel rocket motor. Combustion is obtained by feeding liquid fuel or liquid oxidizer on a solid core containing only fuel or only oxidizer. The need for pressurized gas or pump in liquid fuel systems is only required for fuel or only oxidizer in hybrid systems. For this reason, there are simpler structures than solid fuel systems, but more complex than liquid fuel systems.

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freedomsphoenix.com%2FUploads%2FGraphics%2F522-1201141012-a.png&t=572&c=yS3IuyJFGGdoCA

and if a follower of flat land to send into space, then what will? What are the answers or questions.

And where did it go then the money from taxes. People give their zarabotanye and where is not known.

Listen to what they say about gravity, "There isn't any gravity; it is only density." Since there isn't any gravity, is their density going to make it harder or easier for them?

 ;D

You make it harder for me, BADickhead.

Bend over and I'll drive you home, darling.

You daffy little retarded slut, you.

 :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-* :-*

https://i.imgur.com/iOM8L13.gif (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22+%22gravity+is+density%22)

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22flat+earth%22+%22gravity+is+density%22

Once again, nomad13666 proves flat earth is for retards and perverts.    8)

I love you too.

Thanks for the blowjob, cock breath.

 :-*

Interesting answer. I would not have been able to answer. There are more questions than answers would always remain so. Such people who do not even think about these things and subsequently, to ask questions about what is hard to understand is not worth.

The absence of gravitational force, I did not even think. You really quite seriously think so? And how to explain what I Nadab the tree down and not up?

Your handle got me to thinking. Maybe there really isn't any gravity. Maybe it is a big tractor beam from deep under ground that holds everything down.

 ;D

https://i.imgur.com/ziDJRO7.jpg

You're almost there, Sparky.

Just one more step...

 :-*

And what about the colonization of Mars? It is not the first encounter information that is going to the expedition, followed by a settlement on the planet ..

I'm sorry but space is a lie, all of it including the idea that Mars is a rocky celestial body people can visit. Everything NASA presents to you is a lie and magic trick.

This picture makes one think about the integrity of the brain. Perhaps all of the ideas of space and of how to get there cause a violent reaction from the people.

If we assume that the fraud carried out flights into space and the rocket engines that may not work outside the ground, where it is interesting if all the money that is allocated on the go. What and who benefits from it.

In general, is it possible to understand at least a little something from the fact that the propagandists are trying to convey to people. But it's all quite seriously, without the slightest hint of a joke.

In the coming years it will come off an expedition to Mars to begin implementation of the plan to move the world. I do not know how to react when you read in this topic.

https://i.imgur.com/bxdcCF1.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22space+is+fake%22+%22nasa+lies%22)
Space is FAKE - NASA lies
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22space+is+fake%22+%22nasa+lies%22

At the time, we did not believe in the fact that someone was flying to the moon. Only distrust causes in general were not linked to the lack of space or ground plane, and the general unavailability of technology at the time.

This region of the fiction and not even understand how this can be true in reality. Here you are arguing with each other, but still every year different states launch satellites that give us information about the weather or communications and more. How to explain this fact?

Weather balloons.

Who would ask a question and to get really honest answer about whether the Americans were flying to the moon or not. On the one hand, it seemed possible, and on the other it is possible to lie, because if would have been at least once, then flew to the second. But alas ...

Interesting is the fact that vacuum can not undergo chemical reactions including burning, because it needs to be oxygen, but it is not there. But perhaps not everyone knows that the rocket motor is equipped with not only fuel, but a mixture of supporting the entire process.

So we have people going to fly to Mars and even arrange a settlement there. And the moon is no longer relevant and generally were not even matter whether someone is there or not.

Then we see at night? Why glow races or what is the point of that burn in the sky? If Nasa deceives us, why not study the alternative ideas of what surrounds us.

There is a theory that proves that there is still life in the land. As if there are civilizations that live at great depths beneath us. Already so many things you can read about the creation of life, or you do not know whom to trust and whom not.

Well, if the rocket can not fly in space, it means that you need to seek from governments the reduction of space programs. There is nothing to rob the people in this way.

Quite a lot, I read about what people reject the existence of the space. Even in the old days for other thoughts Inquisition executed people. Then why and who made it possible to distribute the existing theory today. Why and who needs it.

After such a declaration has already missiles do not want to be interested. Tell us if someone is artificially created? We like rabbits? Flat land and everything like that to prove, instead of writing all sorts of nonsense.

Some say the infinity of the world, and others on limited amounts of land. Maybe it's due to the fact that in everyday life we ​​always have to deal with finite quantities only, with a finite number of certain objects and human infinity beckons its unusual and even mysterious.

Are you ready to smile and answered in the negative. This response helpfully tells you your daily experience. However, do not rush. It turns out that quite impossible in ordinary life and ordinary arithmetic, it is quite real.

However, such arguments can not justify the serious scientific findings. We have a lot we can not imagine, but this in itself does not prove anything.

Who needs proof? People believe anything if they hear it often enough? It's called political science.

For example. The whole idea of evolution is based on, like, 99.999% people talking about it being real, even though it has never been proven. In fact, it is only within the last decade or so that there is any evidence at all that it might have some slight semblance of truth in it. Yet the books are full of it.

Political science rules. Say it enough, and it will be believed. That is what political science is. So, evolution and a lot of other things have been proven by science. But they have only been proven by the lies of political science, the only science that COULD BEGIN to prove them.

8)

The theory of gravity have never been proven, but it can be tested how solid the theory is by jumping of a roof.
Theory isn't guessing. Its a pool of knowledge.

Gravity works. Gravity is fact.

The Theory of Gravity is a guesswork idea of why and how gravity works.

8)

Flight to Mars is planned already in several countries which are ready to run to the red planet manned spacecraft in the next 30 years. However, despite these promising prospects, scientists continue to argue about the feasibility of such a flight.

Elon Musk owned company Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) in early December should provide the US federal authorities to the preliminary report on the investigation into the September catastrophe that destroyed at the launch site spacecraft Falcon 9.

entered to ask some hints about how make rockets for terrorist purposes, but this is only a joke thread

sad

Sounds like you fit right in.    8)

All rockets get dumped in the ocean or detonated, if it's hitting land it's probably a cruse missile.

https://i.imgur.com/XpJnP8w.gif

if u are a rocket scientist,that s really good .but  seriously is the earth flat?are we being fooled or is  it that we are being fooled? :)

US Navy Missile Instructor confirms FLAT EARTH ---> https://youtu.be/xJOB0vcZ4NI

Traveling in space can make you weak, tired, sick, and, with a certain degree of probability, those suffering from depression.

How can people of this age still believe that earth is flat ?? They're just TROLLING !
By flat do you mean that it is some kind of 2D plane ? This means that if one starts digging then we would easily get to the other side of the earth as it is "flat".
Where is the edge of "flat" earth ?
If the earth is "flat" how come we are able to see nothing beyond the horizon in places like sea waters ? Though we should have been able to see far off places/land if earth wasn't round.
And, how come ALL the other planets that we observe from earth appear round but not earth ? Due to gravitation, the EARTH IS ROUND !

Now stop trolling :P

We are not adapted to living in a vacuum, our evolution is not included like. Therefore, the space for us is closed for ever.

Jet engines produce very heavy loads, and even if reposed on the moon is due to overload the blood moves to the legs and to stay awake, we need to ensure that the blood supply to the brain. How can a person endure.

^^^ There's no gravity, no outer-space, no curve, no edge, we're inside an enclosed system and the Earth is a flat motionless plane. Even if outer-space was real a rocket can't fucking work in a vacuum!

This post shows that you are just trolling. How does it show this? By your statement that there is no gravity.

There is something that holds us to the earth. If we jump into the air a couple of feet, something causes us to be forced back down. If we throw a ball into the air, it falls back to the earth for some strange reason.

This is the thing that we call gravity. Who cares how it works? It is gravity. To say it is not is simply changing the meaning of the word "gravity."

This proves that the whole flat-earth thread is designed simply to mess with the minds of people. Trolls are doing it. If you, notbatman, happen to not be a troll yourself, then you are being used by trolls without knowing it. If you are being used by trolls without knowing it, think of what is happening to nomadxxxxxx, who can't do anything except populate this thread with perversity.

8)

This theory OP concocted is highly improbable. If the earth was flat how do you explain planes flying back and forth and can go around the world and be back to where they came from? It's really stupid in my opinion.

They'll tell you that the planes are all covertly set up to lie to you, and that even the pilots don't realize what is happening.

Of course, they can't explain how thousands of technicians can have the wool so pulled over their eyes while they are doing their maintenance jobs.

8)

The OP is about rockets and rocketry and it is not theory, but if you must critique the bit about FE I'll say this in response. If you fly east or west you'll go in a circle,  if you fly north you'll get to the center and if you fly south you'll reach the ice wall.

Do some reasearch before you post next time, idiot.

I see that the post right above this one, completely bypasses the details, and goes right into picking on you (Gotottack) without anything to back it up.

8)

He's calling me stupid you piece of shit, I don't have a right to defend myself?

Why does air pressure effect thrust if thrust is caused by transfer of momentum like the liars at universities/NASA/TV claim? Who's the fucking moron here, me or the fucking livestock just waiting to be turned into pizza that believes this propaganda?

edit:

You'll probably make some nice dogs too.

https://i.imgur.com/WE4uVVl.jpg

Of course air affects thrust. However, the amount of affect is so extremely small that it is considered nil. In space, especially, at one ion per cubic centimeter of space (at the distance of the earth from the sun), there is essentially no effect at all until the rocket starts reaching many thousands of miles per hour.

8)

Did you get that you piece of shit line from the movie Cliffhanger?     ;D

How's funny farm life treating you?

8)

Critters

great film. opened my eyes

Love your handle.   :D    Did Critters have rockets?    8)

How can people in 2017 still believe the earth is a spinning ball flying and wobbling through fairy tale fantasy "space".

I found interesting how people are blind and ignorant nowadays. Look around you and do some research. Don't be a globot zombie and you will quickly find your post as example of nonsense.

I can help you for pointing out this flat earth for dummies video for start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djgPdJ9u4hE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djgPdJ9u4hE)

Also you can visit a huge thread in this forum in fact it is in front of your nose: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg17067040#msg17067040 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg17067040#msg17067040)

They are not trolling.

They simply have a metal blind spot like the people who fall for the Nigerian email scams.

8)

Are we actually discussing rocket science here? I can address half of the posts that I've seen while skimming through this thread. That said, I haven't been able to tell if they were a joke or not since sarcasm really doesn't translate well through plain text without. Before I spend an hour writing how thrust/motion/momentum/etc works from a current and theoretical standpoint, figured I'd ask if anyone is actually interested, or if this is a joke.

I'm well on my way to getting a PHD in Nuclear Physics. Its not quite Rocket Science, but theres a good deal of overlap with quantum mechanics/dynamics/etc.

FYI Earth isn't flat, rockets do work in space, gravity/light/inertia are really strange subjects that are just best current models and are subject to change.

HAHAHA I just want one person to make me a renditioned picture of earth in space as a flat surface... please?

The Sagnac Experiment.


Here's a video presentation: https://youtu.be/SWmlimH7laY


https://i.imgur.com/kiZ3HpI.jpg

The problem with the Sagnac Effect is that it absolutely is explained by Relativity. The thing that is called Aether Effect in the video, works similarly in Relativity.

While Einstein might have claimed that the aether does not exist, he is right at the level of science in which he was working. The fact that there are levels of science beyond Einstein's thinking, shows that in higher science, aether exists just as greater dimensions exist. Neither Sagnac or Einstein go into enough science or enough detail to prove either of them right. That's why both are considered to be SCIENTIFIC THEORIES, and not science fact.

The point, again, is, there is not enough explanation in the video to allow a person to make come to an accurate conclusion. How is this? There are many statements in the video that one needs to take as truth without knowing why he should take them as truth. There are, also, many aspects of this science that are unknown by anybody.

The result is that the video proves nothing, and that the person who uses the video to prove something is really an ignoramus.

8)

I'll start by saying, no one really knows what light is. Everyone including Einstein knew that Relativity is not 100% correct, there are a number of experiments that find fundamental flaws in relativity, however the degree of error is so minor, they haven't be consequential to physics applications thus far. Relativity is currently the closest model we have today, but there are some pieces that we are missing about light. Relatively doesn't account for light having momentum but no mass, no mass, but being effected by gravity, etc (relativistic mass aside). The current theory that light is a photon is to some degree wrong. The Aether theories are pretty fundamentally incorrect though. The vast majority of them were based on the classical physics assumption that light is a wave and therefore requires some medium, like sound to travel. Classifying light as a photon states that its some sort of "mass-less particle that exhibits some wave behavior" which rejects the need for a medium. Though I theorize that light does have some amount of mass, just to an inconsequentially small degree.

Neutrinos which share a pretty high rate of similarity with light (minus the wave behavior) were discovered in the 1990s, so the laws of physics are still changing to minor degrees. Both are quazi energy emissions from the sun's fusion reactions. Neutrinos approach the speed of light, but have mass so likely don't exceed the speed of light (though thats been a subject of study for a while).

My point being, there are a ton of topics that haven't quite been proven yet, but that doesn't mean our existing understanding is wrong. Hell, look at magnetic monopoles, there is absolutely no reason that they don't exist, but no one has yet proven their existence. Throw some irregular electric fields into the equation, and that might correct the 0.000000000000000000000000000001% error that exists in current mathematical projections, and solve all of the experiments that had strange conclusions.

I've heard Sagnac's theory mentioned before when talking about orbits/satellites, but I had never looked in depth about it. It has applications within relativity that it wasn't trying to create. From what I read into it (on both sides of the argument pro and against) it looks like a frame of reference experiment. I found that this page pretty well described the experiment and what can be drawn from it, without bias. http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

Thank you for the link. A layman might even understand it if he went through it slowly enough.

8)

The Sagnac Experiment is irrefutable empirical proof of the aether, I highly recommend and in-depth look at it. Then check out Airy's Failure Experiment, it uses a water filled telescope to slow the speed of light from a star and it empirically proves the Earth is motionless. Finally the Michelson & Morley Experiment corroborates Airy's Failure in providing empirical proof that Earth is motionless.

I'll look into these as well. I'm just wondering if you actually believe in the aether, flat earth, motionless earth, etc, or if you are just curiously looking into the possibilities of phenomenon found from prominent experiments? I absolutely don't reject the idea that you should always question anomalies, if we didn't we wouldn't ever discover new things, but if you do actually believe in the contrarian points of view, I'm genuinely interested why.

As I said, I haven't looked into the cases you recommended I look at yet, and I intend to, but whats great about science, is that its typically mostly absolute, and repeatable. I can probably list 50,000 ways to prove that the earth is round, it is in motion, and that there is likely no aether (that last one I'll put a question mark by, because there could be some medium of interference in the atmosphere which we could call aether). A good portion of them that you can verify for yourself with cheap and simple experiments. If you ever read a lot of posts by flat earthers, they are absolutely ridiculous, and rely heavily on semi logic. Taking bits of conclusive data that progresses their point of view, and rejecting the parts of the same experiments that work against it.

I used to write out this math expression that stated a+b = a^2 + b^2 and solved it algebraically to prove it was true. It had a few conditions, but the algebra stated that it was true. It used to annoy the hell out of my elementary/middle school math teachers, because they couldn't disprove it. After taking differential equations, I figured out that the trick was that half way through, I was using an identity for linear transformations, but the expression was affine rather than linear. It was something like a 50 step problem to setup, no one would notice that I was making a misleading step, because typically it would have been true, except for a tiny detail that most people don't think about. I find that a lot of these countertheory explanations use similar tricks to mislead people.

The aether exists. It isn't anything like the flat-earth people think it is. It will take proving out some more dimensions to start finding the proof. A hint about what it is and how it works lies in parallel universe theory.

Essentially, for us laymen, the aether is an elastic solid which makes up all the parallel universes. We use the term "vibration" or "frequency" for understanding electromagnetic spectrum differences. The frequencies of the various parallel universes, that distinguish one from another, are not really electromagnetic. Rather, they are dimensional, in a way that is difficult to explain and not completely understood.

For example... and I won't be saying this entirely correctly. An electron is made up of wave particles that are parts of other universes, where other of the parallel universes touch and then relinquish their touch. When they relinquish their touch, different universes take up the touch and relinquish. Our universe is part of the flow that causes "electrons" in the other universes, just like they are part of the flow that cause electrons in our universe and "electrons" in each other.

The whole thing acts dimensionally, and that is why Einstein, Sagnac and others are never going to be able to explain it clearly. Most Einstein stuff will remain theory. Such theory will only be explained by complex computer calculation figuring out enough dimensional math that we don't presently have... math in directions that we have a difficult time wrapping our heads around.

8)

I'll just leave this here, it's an uncensored version of Maxwell's Equations.

http://posner.library.cmu.edu/Posner/books/pages.cgi?call=537_M46T_1873_VOL._2&layout=vol0/part0/copy0&file=0263 (http://posner.library.cmu.edu/Posner/books/pages.cgi?call=537_M46T_1873_VOL._2&layout=vol0/part0/copy0&file=0263)

Scientists were playing hide & seek in heaven. ..
Einstein was seeker..
Newton didn’t hide & stood in a square of 1 meter ..
Einstein: I found u Newton !! Thhappa !!!
Newton: U are Wrong ..I am not Newton..As I am standing in 1 mtr square, I am Newton/mt sq.
So I am Pascal

HITLER'S GHOST ISLAND (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2020632/secret-nazi-treasure-hunter-base-arctic-found-abandoned-poisoned-polar-bears/) Secret Nazi ‘Treasure Hunter’ base in Arctic found by Russian scientists after being abandoned over 70 years ago when crew was poisoned by polar bear meat


A TOP secret Nazi base in the depths of the Arctic has been found by Russian scientists after more than 70 years.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/secret-nazi-wwii-base-in-arctic-located-by-russian-experts-00_00_00_00-still001-1.jpg?w=960&strip=all
https://clips.news.co.uk/thesun/sydHl2NjE6gDw-3Crm59A-Eo--EZHpZM/DOcJ-FxaFrRg4gtDEwOnI5OjAwMTvlg2 (https://clips.news.co.uk/thesun/sydHl2NjE6gDw-3Crm59A-Eo--EZHpZM/DOcJ-FxaFrRg4gtDEwOnI5OjAwMTvlg2)




Read more and look at the pictures at https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2020632/secret-nazi-treasure-hunter-base-arctic-found-abandoned-poisoned-polar-bears/.


8)

From the information on the network that goes Jet engine is the engine that creates the necessary movements for the thrust by converting internal energiitopliva into kinetic energiyureaktivnoy stream of the working fluid. Thus it turns out that the vacuum does not create any obstacles.

It's an interesting story and a lot is still unknown to the present day. I do not believe that nobody is interested in and what about the treasure forgotten.

The point is that the Nazis were great rocket scientists. Anything that proves their existence is pro rocketry. Just ask the people of England about the Nazi rockets that destroyed them and their families in WW2.

8)

8)

^ liar, the elites in the UK were complicit in the re-appropriation of assets and re-location of people; the V2 is 100% propaganda.

https://i.imgur.com/lFdVnYM.png

Oh oh oh guys, do not try to negotiate such things in Russia forum thread. This is politics. There's all white say black.

I am really kinda curious as to what your game is. Are you truly a wacko in some kind of funny farm? Or, are you a disgruntled scientist who is out to ruin the science community because they snubbed you somewhere along the line? Or, are you working for the CIA in some kind of psyops testing? Or, might you truly have the goal of becoming part of a minority group that is big enough to get government funding? If it is this last thing, Trump's government will be shutting down a lot of free money, so it will be harder than ever to get your money gravy-train going.

Even amateur rocket scientists know that the V2 flew to the edges of space, and then, simply dropped, free fall style, onto whomever the targets were. By the time they reached thick enough atmosphere where the sound of their coming might be heard, they were already traveling faster than the speed of sound, so that they were ahead of the sound they were making, including the sonic boom they made. In their explosion, nobody could tell the difference between the explosion, and the sonic boom that followed shortly on the heels of the explosion. Besides, nobody knew what a sonic boom was back then... so all they understood was the explosion.

Why are you promoting something as silly as your fake rocket science? Is it a religion for you, and you simply really believe it? I understand that I probably won't get a truthful answer from you, but my curiosity, and that of others, has truly been piqued. Are you totally a troll, attempting to see how long you can push this thread? I mean, everybody has heard the proverbial idea of pushing a rope. But are you really trying to push a thread?

Now, quickly reply, with a bunch of replies, so this post of mine gets hidden in the obscurity of your blabber.

8)

At the expense of world politics it is very difficult to say anything at all. We do not participate in any negotiations, or even do not know the real situation regarding the issues that guided policy.

That's great. But standard rocket science is real, just the same.    8)

Rockets to measure its superiority in the world, is the destiny of fools. We do come to destroy the whole earth.

Interestingly How far humanity can move forward in space exploration in the next 10 years? Will the possible tourist flights, the colonization of the Moon and travel to Mars?

It depends on the state of war and the money system. The indicators that suggest that the money system should have collapsed way back in 2014 are not working. Yet, they are age-old indicators that have always worked in the past. Probably their failure is due to the amount of money brought into being through Quantitative Easing. QE is simply putting off the big crash for a while.

The point? If big war, or the money crash, come, who knows what will happen? There may be no future space exploration at all.

8)

This stealing from the budgets of all countries. Each person has no idea how much it deceived and forced to pay taxes and then steal the money for Nasa.

Remember one basic thing. Taxes are simply people stealing from people. The idea of Government is just an excuse to make it more palatable for the people being stolen from.

Religions like Islam and Mormonism are religions built on taxes. Many of the other religions are built of free will offerings.

Stop the taxation in a non-rebellious way. Be shrewd, so that you don't get hurt.

8)

EM Drive is an "impossible" spacecraft engine that generates thrust ... (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209269-2016-12-20-em-drive-is-an-impossible-spacecraft-engine-that-generates-thrust.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/693-1220074347-EM-Drive-Thrust-engine.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209269-2016-12-20-em-drive-is-an-impossible-spacecraft-engine-that-generates-thrust.htm)




Read more and click the links at http://www.naturalnews.com/2016-12-19-em-drive-impossible-spacecraft-propulsion-device-generates-thrust-quantum-vacuum.html.


Note the, above, part that says:

8)

China says tests of Propellentless EMDrive on Tiangong 2 space station were successful (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209388-2016-12-21-china-says-tests-of-propellentless-emdrive-on-tiangong-2-space.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/522-1221184824-a.png (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209388-2016-12-21-china-says-tests-of-propellentless-emdrive-on-tiangong-2-space.htm)




Read more and click the links at http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/china-says-tests-of-propellentless.html.


8)

Not everyone tells a lie but i think the government lie to protect the citizens from panic. Not everyone can handle something like am extra terrestrial beings or just plain old flat Earth.

I can understand them lying about aliens but a flat earth? I think we would all know its flat now for 5000 years if it indeed was flat.

To answer your question, I need to deeply research on rockets or else I should meet a scientist.

No, you don't need to do any deep research. You just need to do the experiment I proposed earlier in the thread (which has not yet been refuted):

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/208119-2016-12-01-private-moon-rovers-may-visit-the-apollo-17-landing-site.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/522-1201141012-a.png (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/208119-2016-12-01-private-moon-rovers-may-visit-the-apollo-17-landing-site.htm)




Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.


8)

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

Helium-3 mining might be a reason to keep going there is much more of it on the moon then on earth.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

8)

During the Cold War, space was one of the arenas for the struggle between the Soviet Union and the United States. Geopolitical confrontation between the superpowers - the main stimulus in those years for the development of the space industry. On the implementation of the space program has been thrown a huge amount of resources. In particular, on the implementation of the "Apollo" project, whose main objective was landing a man on the moon, the US government has spent about twenty-five billion dollars. What will be the continuation of this confrontation will be offended if the huge opening.

It is believed that the moon at all and that the artificial body may be that it is generally alien base. That's what people are frightened and flew there.

From the point of view of economic expediency of the program "Space Shuttle" can hardly be called successful. Spaceships disposable proved to be much more economical than their seemingly more technologically advanced reusable counterparts. Yes, and flight safety to the "shuttles" in doubt.

Environmental disasters, overpopulation, wars and other crises have forced humanity with caution and be wary of experimentation and limit yourself to the home planet. Many now believe that the study and settlement of space can be by addressing some of the pressing problems in the world. As a result of space flights is significantly moved forward in comparison with the beginning of the century. Therefore, the price does not matter.

Jerry Pournelle talks about China's orbital tests of the EMDrive as a bigger than Sputnik moment (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209679-2016-12-27-jerry-pournelle-talks-about-chinas-orbital-tests-of-the-emdrive.htm)


https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Uploads/Graphics/522-1227144454-emdrive.jpg (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/209679-2016-12-27-jerry-pournelle-talks-about-chinas-orbital-tests-of-the-emdrive.htm)




Read more at http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/jerry-pournelle-talks-about-chinas.html.


[Note that properly designed, the EMdrive can propel things on earth, as well.]


8)

good work dude

well i still dont think that earth is flat

And what will be the real proof of this plan? If you take balesticheskie missiles, they are designed for omelets in the atmosphere, and space rockets to the two types, one for the main vacuum and a carrier who brings into orbit. So they have a different purpose.

So many followers of the ideas or thoughts on flat ground, making it a community of people in a large sect that is not clear why the idea promoted in society. But these people are incredibly actively defend the flat ground.

To work and to think that we live like guinea pigs, this is too much.

At this rate, the Chinese are ahead of the rest will master the very first space and distant planets. It is their task they perform.

Opportunities to conquer the space is very large. According to experts, to reach the orbit of Mars, astronauts will be able to 2033, and by 2039 they will make the first landing on the planet's surface.

Just go POP and sleep  :P :-\

It was recently released information about that Mars found clay, which cracked from water. This is the greatest discovery of even a confirmation of photos depicting this fact.

At the expense of a plane I'm sure it was a joke, but some people perceive it seriously.

Do you think that these things someone can understand? If a person has one or two drops, and the idea that the earth is flat, you probably already owes nothing to help. Even the equation too.

So all the people that have shown a solid nonsense and lies. Probably cinema greatly succeeded, if this movie took off the landing Americans on the moon. About Mars will no longer speak. Although the technology is not what it used to be. But the theory of the structure of the earth completely redraw all.

If we really DID go to the moon, the expense was so great that it isn't profitable to do it frequently. Otherwise we would be doing it regularly right now.

Someday the expense might come down, and it might be profitable. But it won't happen until we eliminate poverty in the world. Why not? There are too many people who fight the stupidity of a moon shot while there is poverty around the world.

8)

I do not think anyone is interested in poverty, people around the world. So much lately sounded information that any rich vlazhivayut money in different projects, which do not carry an important character for humanity at this time. Even the recent statement of the colonization of Mars and preparing to fly to the planet.

Google "anti poverty charities."    8)

Why discuss the invention of the last century. For the era of the atom and other high technologies. Can not you try to make a nuclear engine for space rockets. It's quite likely.

I read about flying to the moon and on what benefits it can bring us. The fact that the moon can extract valuable minerals, and other important things for the industry. It can lift the global economy, and more resources for fighting poverty.

For travel or study deep space financing of one country is very small. Only together all developed countries will be able to achieve great results and break new conquest of the universe technologies. But since all the feuding, it is not feasible.

I agree that the work is good. We need to throw komus information to the masses, and the people in general will soon be fools. And so at least they know what is being done and that the earth is still read a planet and not a piece of rock in the world.

I even thought such a head did not attend, even on such a probability. I do not even think that people generally are thinking about this. But I have already honored a lot of information, and I am sure that this society people flat as flat and thought about the flat land, utter nonsense.

The Chinese may become the first nation on the planet, which will visit the side of the moon. Local media reported that the China National Space Administration is going in 2018 to send to the "dark side" of the moon unmanned space probe.

Right. The dark side of the moon isn't always dark. Sometimes it faces the sun, and is brightly lit up. That's why we have pictures sent back by satellites that went around the moon during the time that the "dark side" was lit up.

8)

The whole story with a lot of lunar cause problems. Already they are going to Mars, and the moon and no one has mastered, despite the fact that there are so many interesting things that we are interested in it, earthlings, even the same helium-3.

Think about this. Elon Musk talks about AI favorably. He also talks about going to Mars. My guess is that he will be sending AI to Mars because he knows that it will be too expensive to keep people alive on a journey like that. All that he needs is some excitement among people so that they don't get up in arms when he uses government grants to finance his missions.

8)

We seem to have a lot of trolls here, but that keeps thing interesting sometimes ;)

The question is, are the trolls the ones who deny standard rocket science and technology? Or are they those who use it everyday?

8)

There are people who genuinely believe that the Earth is flat though.  They tend to show some weird video and chat about a load of supposed evidence in it which doesn't make sense.  Or at least, that's all I've seen of it.

What doesn't make sense to you?

Good point, if you live in the US or Europe a fair amount of your internet probably goes through a satellite.

OMG OMG now i know the truth about everything, i always knew the earth is flat but now i have a good conspiracy theory, i am sure the cia, masons and maybe Nicaragua are behind all of this.

You forgot the Jews.     ;D

Criminals, we're dealing with criminals.

The closest you come to being a rocket scientist is the rock part.

 ;D

And the Illuminati!  :o

Do you think it's all manipulation of people and their opinions? Nevertheless, already they are going to establish travel wealthy tourists into space and back. Although Mars is very far to go. It is also a problem.

I don't know for sure. But there is this.

Back in the 1950s and 1960s, we were told that by the end of the century we would have bases on the moon, with people visiting on a regular basis. Many science fictions books were written, based on this time-frame.

Well, that I know of, we are not even close by 2017. They weren't trustworthy then, so why should anyone think they will be this time? All new technology seems to mean is more toys and more wars.

8)

I'm not sure about Goatse rockets but that's a picture of a BLACK ARROW R4 on display. The BA rockets that were launched all got dumped in the ocean along with its dummy payload satellite the Prospero, the whole program was a fraud.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Arrow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Arrow)







edit:

Since the newbie bumped this, I should add that it's possible the featured rocket actually launched a high altitude balloon. The public narrative still remains a fraud however.

https://youtu.be/ztnlb1Bj_L0

BTC is not rocket science.. and you don't have to be one to understand it.. just some will to learn is all you need

Are.. are we going to the moon, mr scientist?

"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth" -- Exodus 20:4

https://i.imgur.com/F5ZSaka.jpg



The "official narrative" with the use of pseudo-science paints an image of the Moon as a giant terrestrial sphere a man could land on thanks to the magical properties of gravity. Perhaps you'd like to re-think your question unless you like the idea of promoting heresy?

The dream of human flight to the planet Mars has a long history, but now we come to the realization of this dream. Scientists are working on a missile and an opportunity to live in another planet.

Are we actually discussing rocket science here? I can address half of the posts that I've seen while skimming through this thread. That said, I haven't been able to tell if they were a joke or not since sarcasm really doesn't translate well through plain text without. Before I spend an hour writing how thrust/motion/momentum/etc works from a current and theoretical standpoint, figured I'd ask if anyone is actually interested, or if this is a joke.

I'm well on my way to getting a PHD in Nuclear Physics. Its not quite Rocket Science, but theres a good deal of overlap with quantum mechanics/dynamics/etc.

FYI Earth isn't flat, rockets do work in space, gravity/light/inertia are really strange subjects that are just best current models and are subject to change.

Critters

great film. opened my eyes

What scientific proof do you have that "outer space" is real since you want to claim there's rockets up there pushing against nothing as a means of propulsion? Also you realize gravity is an unproven theory right, do you really believe heavy balls in a shed can prove there's heavy balls in the sky?

You'll find light a lot less mysterious once you stop believing there's waves in nothing, what a crackpot theory; special relativity has been empirically disproven.

Hey, at least you'll have somthing to wipe your ass with after a decade and half a million dollars worth of student debt. It's all worth it though when you get the praise of all your Jewish peers who tell you what a good goyim you are.

From the information on the network that goes Jet engine is the engine that creates the necessary movements for the thrust by converting internal energiitopliva into kinetic energiyureaktivnoy stream of the working fluid. Thus it turns out that the vacuum does not create any obstacles.