Bitcoin Forum

Everyone act like crazy conspiracy theories in this thread please.

Not sure to be honest. it's a typical o'reilly styled book cover.

Is it that the B in Bitcoin in the title is not a BTC? ;)

Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency
singular
they say cryptocurrencies meaning more than just bitcoin. such as litecoin, darkcoin, and all the other alt coins out there. Which could not be explained in a 298 page book. ::)

The question is not right how you made it.
What could be wrong, the color or the items painted there?
For me the color is not right, a logo of bitcoin maybe is missing etc..

It's not copyrighted

They used ants instead of a honeybadger.

---

---

Why can it not be copyrighted? It is an authors words and the company O'Reilly paid for his/her's words so they can publish it.
If it can't be copyrighted what would stop you from stealing their words and writing a book of your own?  ;)

My God, I've never seen that cover before. It's really bad. My other beef with it is that it uses 'digital cryptocurrencies' instead of just cryptocurrencies. Is there such a thing as an analogue crypto?

Oh, that is a good one!

those leafcutter ants both have whole leaves

It looks like the ants are holding a leaf with their mouths, and that is not how ants carry things.

If it is not that then it is something else to do with the ants

The ants have too many segments.

The leaf on the bottom left.

The main nerves do not split like that on leaves.

Ants are relevant in a any way to Bitcoin? Because I fail to find any analogy. But I there is nothing 'wrong' with ants of leaves, just a picture.
But after skimming though some more covers from this O'Reilly publisher I see that there is whole series of these awful animal themed covers.

The problem for me is that I never heard about analog cryptocurrencies - this is clear mistake imo.

The writer has ant in his name, hence the ants.

Another possibility might be that an early release featured as

"unlocking digital crypto-currencies" with a dash between crypto and currencies, which it does not feature anymore.

yeah probably too many segments
but some one else already posted that

I foresee some truly epic nitpicking taking place in this thread.

Ant's are considered the workers, miners if you will.
And yes O'Reilly loves to incorporate animals to all their technology books. They are relevant to the material to one shape or form.

I don't think the OP's question is regarding the picture at all but the wording of the title.

The ants give it a really awesome style, like the ants you will need work hard to get any bitcoins  :P

Anyhow, for me the wrong thing is that there is really no way to master Bitcoin, it cant be mastered. Sure you can learn one thing or two but you will never be the all mighty god of Bitcoin.

PS: Y u no BTC instead of B

1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X

A member with newbie account promise to pay 0.5 btc for some stupid thing which may have many possible answer and everyone starts replying.Do you guys really think he will pay 0.5 btc for this?

Yes. You don't think people tell the truth on the internet? I've already booked my ticket into space on the proceeds.

Doesn't really matter. I like riddles, would just hate it if nothing was there to be found.

I just saw something by the way:

The title words are not aligned on the left. Rookie editing mistake.

The M in mastering does not align with the B of bitcoin, the line and the U of unlocking.

that book cover really doesnt look appealing. if i had to guess your opinion I'd say that the colour scheme doesnt work well. and i dont understand how ants carrying leaves symzolizes bitcoin in any way.

you can't "unlock" cryptocurrencies.

that's like "o reilly"?  :D ::)  unlock one of satoshies addresses if you can.

Ants don't carry leaves like that.
Copyrighted material twice
Copyrighted material on top barely visible
Unlocking should be Discovering or something like that
DIGITAL CRYPTOCURRENCIES should be CRYPTOCURRENCY or at best CRYPTOCURRENCIES if talking about more currencies
Words aren't well aligned.

If he doesn't he is going to get negative trust.

But any way, my guess is that you can not "unlock" cryptocurrencies, but they must be "cracked".
As a play on words, so, the cover should say: "Cracking digital crypto-currencies", for the double meaning.

One meaning, to understand.
The other, to code break (which currently has not happened with Bitcoin private keys...yet)

1. many people favour the term 'blockchain currencies' when talking about bitcoin and all the alts using the same basic technology.. 'cryptocurrencies' seems off/geeky
2. what do blockchain currencies have to do with ants holding leaf's?
3. using 'unlocking' and ants.. gives the illusion its insecure and buggy as the hidden metaphor

Maybe it is just a way to promote the book and take a lot of people to follow the link and watch the cover :).

Ants may be for antminers?

I said it and noticed it first, btw. the "unlock" thing.

 :-*

o'reilly have always published stupid covers. here's why:

http://animals.oreilly.com/origin-of-species/

My answer is: Ants are really hardworking animals. But most of bitcoin investors are hoping to get rich easily.

Official explanation about ants: https://github.com/aantonop/bitcoinbook/blob/develop/preface.asciidoc#why-are-there-bugs-on-the-cover

Also; Book is Copyrighted. Quoting from Antonopoulos: (I've dm'ed him about translation print while translating the book)

Quickscammer you're damn right...
http://todayilearned.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/three-ants-carry-chilli-peppers-superior-in-size.jpeg

I have found the page that gives all errors of this book.
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=9781449374044

I am the smartest one of you all. ;D
Just Kidding as the OP is laughing at us for trying.

But if you want the raw and uncut early release go on and see it:
http://files.brendafernandez.com/Mastering%20Bitcoin/Mastering%20Bitcoin.pdf

I like that ant miners. ;)

Nothing is wrong with the cover.

Nice find. The one sold is final release so many revisions until it was published.

The OP is clickbait so he can collect affiliate commission on all your amazon purchases over the next 3 days. That's also why its a newbie account so he doesn't have to make the 0.5btc payout once he's done



You can tip me for exposing the truth here: 1NmVuA5gSFyZTjGDnA5ZADC1YNciP4nXbU

Ooh. It's too bad that you pointed that now. It's going to annoy me now. That's really noticeable now that I realize it!

The kerning is also now irritating me. The t and c in Bitcoin, and the s and t in Mastering.

The angle the ants are walking on.

You can't 'MASTER' Bitcoin.... ;)

well if he is saying 'Mastering Bitcoin' and then goes on to say digital cryptocurrencies on front page, it is a small b for bitcoin talking about it as a digital cryptocurrency
uppercase B for blockchain, coin and protocol
he may go and discuss everything in book, I am sure he must
but the cover description is a little conflicting and vague this way

Lol, I think you nailed it!

Sure you can. You would be called Master of the Universe!  :D
As this thread is not paying this is pooped.  :P

Lol.. just another bitcointalk troll thread. I figured that in my first reply, it was too broad of a question!

The only wrong thing that I found is you are writing Mr Antonopoulos name wrong  :P

BTW, the leaf taken by the ant (down) misses another segment (<<\<)
The 2 leaves taken by the 2 farming ants are different.

It seemed serious enough until about 11 replies in. Then it got stupidly redundant.
This thread is pooched and he is not going to pay.
Just another thread like "Find me these sunglasses" 2 weeks ago. 4 pages longs and OP never intended to pay nobody. Just a waste of everybody's resources, just like this one.  :-\

Did anyone else notice that this newbie account just turned Junior member while we were posting replies.
I think he got his reward from us posting on his topic that he started  ::)

Leaf cutter ants cut segments of leaves, they don't carry whole leaves by the stem.

That ant species dont have tails:

http://s11.postimg.org/nrqlkc46b/image.png

Or its a mutant 7th leg, that doesnt fit there.

Nope that is just the last part of the leg, covered from view by it's Gaster.  ;D ..... If I had to take a stab at it, I would point out that it has... what looks like little wings

on it's back... from my knowledge Leave cutter ants have no wings.  ??? If it is the queen... then she would not be doing the worker ants job.  ;)

Only reproductive ants, queens, and males, have wings. Queens shed their wings after the nuptial flight, leaving visible stubs, a distinguishing feature of queens.

It's just nice to see some quiz on the forum again.... scam or not, it's always fun.  ;D

It looks like everyone seemed to have got it by now
The honeybadger should be there instead of ants
Its redundant to say digital cryptocurrencies when referring to one crytocurrency and O'reilly seems strange.

I am curious if we will ever heard any news in this topic from OP. Either he is really rich early adopter who can give out 0.5 just like that or he is a troll.
If he really pay someone 0.5 BTC I would be genuinely amused. As I think that people gave all possible answers already.

The book is written by Andreas M Antonoupolous or is it that ants only have 6 legs whilst the cover shows 8 ?

interesting way of promoting your affiliate link

Yeah. Isn't it meant to say cryptocurrency rather than cryptocurrencies. It is meant to be singular as Bitcoin is singular.

i don't like the ants with the pink color, it look as a bad combination to me, i would try to do a cover in matrix-esque instead, it much more in the bitcoin theme

Yeah right, It looks weird in 3D, i saw initially a 7th leg there.

---

Ok let's try another one.

The font of the "O'REILLY" is different that then title font. It should be the same.

1. unlocking digital crypto-currencies <- is wrong as concept and wrongly written.
2. the ants <- they have tails? their eyes are huge...


PS. Isn't this more suitable for "games and rounds"? Maybe it should be moved there.

That was my thinking too.  Head, thorax, and Abdomen.

His intention was certainly not to score activity points with this thread because he knew he would soon have all "red numbers " below his forum rank :D

OP did a great job getting his commissioned link spread and everyone in sig campaigns made the profit.
Also as 'Discussion' sub forums doesn't come under disqualified post areas.
Isn't it cool

If the answer hasn't been said already, I'd like to point out that the leaves is the same size as the ants....
So book cover is not to scale? Or is this not what the OP is looking for? (IK, this is a really simple solution)

creative affiliate marketing my friend.  I'll pass on the 0.5btc and aim for affilliate commission on 678 ebooks instead  ;D

Creative answers but no correct one so far.


This is very close in the concept.. but no cigar

How about this one a serious long shot but the ants are not leaf cutter ants they are a different type of ants.

Alright clutching at straws the ants abdomen should be bigger then the thorax ? Is this even close ?

Right apart from my last two guesses about the proportions of the ants I would go for the obvious answer it isn't a book its a digital publication.

I guess I'm not smart enough then as I can't think of anything else.

The ants thing again since they are Leaf cutter ants they are considered to be farmers because they harvest the leaves to make compost whilst Bitcoin has miners.

Let me give it a try. Nothing is wrong! Ants represent hardworking miners or people that are taking care of Bitcoin instead of the mighty bankers and government people that are just looking after their own a**!

Everything is just right in my opinion! :)

Ant carries leafs implies that bitcoin is a commodity that can be stacked and hoarded.

However bitcoin is a currency so there should be some other animal there that shows the spendable nature of bitcoin.

Is it the title itself "Mastering Bitcoin" being incorrect as nobody can truly 'master' bitcoin.

Everyone "oh master" "oh mastering"

i posted that already...

Or, have they used bitcoin instead of the blockchain?  as the cover refers to "Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies" which indicates more than the one currency and bitcoin is just one of the many Cryptocurrencies and if the book is about unlocking Cryptocurrencies then it should perhaps read "Mastering the Blockchain" "Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies"

That's all I have

lol I didn't read the second part of your comment oops Master has been said

Nothing wrong with the cover. Just that I don't understand what ants & leaves got to do with bitcoins.

The author already explained this. Just make a quick search on the net and you will find why

The color should be orange.

O'reily shouldn't be seen anywhere near anything you do, to be honest.

And instead of ants there should be miners. :)

ants know nothing about bitcoin.

Hmm, maybe they used the wrong type of animal?

https://i.imgur.com/DHUNfyp.jpg

Although, I much prefer the honey badger :)

There is nothing to unlock in cryptocurrences.

Well, it says very less about how BTC really is! ants that saves for winter? really?

That's not a tail, it's the end of the rear right-side leg.

The alpaca is the unofficial mascot of bitcoin!

http://www.coindesk.com/alpacas-the-unofficial-mascot-of-bitcoin/

As said above, it should be an Alpaca. Or a pair of alpaca socks, or at least the BTC symbol.

Well here is what I think, just like any ant, you acccidently stand on one and shit comes out.

Just like this guy.

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Never+a+miscommunication+every+single+day+oc+by+loudhawk_b52051_3384967.jpg

http://a.fsdn.com/sd/firehose/009/839/904-1.png http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51TDyaEvhcL._SX379_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
They look the same?

Ants are not decentralized. They are controlled by the queen.

Very good. That should be the answer if it isn't the correct one.

The usage of ants would imply that we are all stupid little drones working for our corporate masters. They are probably right but I would prefer a big panda bear on the cover.

let me try the title say Mastering Bitcoin Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies
Cryptocurrencies? if the book is all about Mastering Bitcoin it should be cryptocurrency i guess
or maybe mastering cryptocurrencies if what inside the book is about diffirent cryptocurrencies

Ants aren't controlled by the queen.

The book is comparing bitcoiners (us) to ants. This mean that this cover is seeing us as slaves that have no personal feelings and that work for a centralised authority, which can be can be the FIAT system.

On the other hand, if we see positively ants, the cover can tell that we are building strong structures (like ants nests, but here Bitcoin), small fragments by small fragments. Even if this is not something wrong, this is still my analysis of that cover and maybe it can inspire you ;) !

The color is purple when bitcoin is golden.

"What is this? A book for ants!?" (Zoolander). Sorry I had to do it.

With that being said, I can only speak of the book cover design since I'm a graphic designer. I know it's part of a series (O'Reilly) and animals are the unifying theme (plus same typography and different colors for each one) but I don't really how ants fit or communicate what Bitcoin is all about.

The way I understand it tries to communicate the skill of growing or accumulating Bitcoin. This is a perfectly valid idea and fits the whole animal theme I mentioned. The problem is the image of hard working ants communicates just that, hard work and a demanding read.

I would've used another animal for sure.

Who or what are they controlled by?
Worker Ants are simple beings performing basic functions that ultimately supports the queen (and her eggs).
Even if the queen does not have true control over them, their existence is to her (and her eggs) service.

God save the Queen!

it seems that he is right, they only work together to support the colony, they have their own agenda, on what should be done, but it's not done primarily for the queen, they however protect the queen in the case it is needed

Since too many asking about ants, read this preface:

The ant at the top has an extra leg. I think.

You can't master Bitcoin. Why would you title the book like that?

Bitcoin's economy and lifeforce is always changing, as are all cryptocurrencies. You can never master it because it is constantly dynamically shifting.

Also, ya don't usually see a leafcutter ant holding a stem. :)

It may be true that they "only work together to support the colony,... its not done primarily for the queen...",

but according to http://www.pestworldforkids.org/pest-guide/ants/ (http://www.pestworldforkids.org/pest-guide/ants/) (lol),:

Colony = Queen,
Queen = Colony

God save the Queen!

ants don't carry leaves, but only  a part of it, in fact they have a mouth with tooth for this!

Could be that. Like I said, you don't see leafcutter ants holding stems. :)

If it is that, I wonder who would be credited. ;) Probably isn't though lol

I have lived in Central america in the past and I have seen large ants that were totally capable of handling entire leaves.

Perhaps entire leaves, but you do very, very rarely see them with the stem. Perhaps every once in a blue moon, but not that often.

They definitely wouldn't hold them by the stem either.

Well in costa rica there are thousands of little shits swarming my yard and they get into my house too. Maybe I will take some photos next time I go back to see if any have stems.  X'D

when we get the solution? (even if there is a solution?)

I think people are not ants, Because ants are ruled by their queens and may be kings (:P Dont have that much knowledge) or in simple words, They don't have the freedom of choice. So the only thing wrong here in this case would be. That we are ants, And if don't have freedom we would never buy/read that book. Because of mind control and power.

So in that case it wrong.

The word "Mastering" is supposed to be above the purple box, like most (but not all) of the other O'Reilly programming books where there is a verb in the title.

What's the relationship about "ant" and bitcoin anyway?? And the leaves too.

Maybe that's the thing is wrong with the book cover. Because no relationship.

Same question here
I would like to see a deadline and see the OP response even if no one had the correct answer...

Maybe he meant mastering as mastering your knowledge on how it works, what it can do and what is happening with it currently.

"Mastering Bitcoin" by Andreas Antonopolous

it has to do if i'm not mistaken, with the initial letter of Antonopolous, his name

The OP wrote the author name wrong but it is correct on the ebook cover

baited for an epic ponzi :D

I may seem silly
but i think .. it is O'reilly

But on the book cover they have used "." instead of " '  " .. lol

Didn't read the whole thread, maybe it was said before...anyway, "digital cryptocurrency" is a useless repetition? cryptocurrency already implies the concept of bitcoin being a digital currency.

Op was on earlier today but didn't look at this thread I presume this is nothing but trolling since he hasn't left a single reply here.

just replace the ants into tree growing to its full size with falling bitcoins on it.

IMO it is appropriate to put insects on the cover of a book only if the book is somehow biology-oriented. The cover looks very unappealing to me and I would never buy such a book.

I can understand if they made this cover because they were paid by Bitmain though.  :)

What's wrong with it? It's a book on software and it's covered in bugs!

The honey badger would eat all the bugs?  :-\

The ants are farming and forgot a leaf? lol

Probably. He only has 9 posts and claims to be an "early adopter"

 Ecologists call the ants "mutualists" because they cooperate with another species for mutual benefit. Each leaf-cutter species has its own mutualist partner, a fungus that it grows and cultivates for food and that in turn depends on the ants for food and shelter.

Mutualism is the way two organisms of different species exist in a relationship in which each individual benefits from the activity of the other. Similar interactions within a species are known as co-operation. Mutualism can be contrasted with interspecific competition, in which each species experiences reduced fitness, and exploitation, or parasitism, in which one species benefits at the expense of the other. Mutualism is a type of symbiosis. Symbiosis is a broad category, defined to include relationships that are mutualistic, parasitic, or commensal. Mutualism is only one type.

The instances of cooperation in nature far outweighs those of conflict. Take the honey badger and the honey guide bird for example. The bird leads the badger (or the human) to the bee hive full of honey and lets nature take it course. The bird then picks up the scraps.

This being the case it only makes sense to revise the cover of the book to include a honey guide bird and a honey badger. Also, as other users have pointed out a Bitcoin logo would also be good.

There's nothing wrong on the cover, you are just advertising the book  :)

(If i'm right, I hope it's for a greater good and not for your personal advantage)

Any how, ants forage for food they are not antminers
http://www.dhresource.com/albu_602156808_00-1.200x200/ant-bitcoin-miner-1-6-gh-s-usb-miner-bitcoin.jpg

I am sorry, but in my opinion, this book cover is so off.  Ants are not mining insects, they are colonists.  Some people get this confused when they think of ants because they dig into the earth.  When ants dig into the earth, they bring out dirt to complete their "paths", but they take in items such as leaves and such for food and storage.  Even though some mining companies are starting to use ants and termites to determine where gold deposits are locates, they are still not miners, they are colonists and always will be.  They would have been better putting a picture of a wood pecker or such on the book, those are real miners who "mine" trees for food.

I don't think that is why there are ants on the book?  Her last name has ants in it and I think they were just doing that.  Anyway did anyone actually figure out and receive the prize from this OP?

Is it that there is no space between the "M." and the "Antonopoulos"? E.g., it is wrote "Andreas M.Antonopoulos" but should be "Andreas M. Antonopoulos".

https://ewpopwatch.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/i-got-a-fever-cowbell-christopher-walken_320.jpg
"Pretty good thread, but I wanna hear a little more nitpicking?"

http://coinjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Joshua-Garza-Car1.jpg

I am actually the Homer Garza. By the power of my wife's dragon dildo i banish you all from this thread for your insolence

dont foget to retweet my latest scheme

if anyone gets this contest right until christmas i will eat an edible shoe

If not: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=412667

Andreas is resorting to really drastic measures to market his book, eh?

Would you give me 0.5 BTC if I didn't tell anybody that you're the OP? HAHAHA According to the logs, deliciousowl and the OP, gumcruise, are the same person. Anybody wanna see the logs, just ask me and I'll provide the proof. Logs don't lie. HAHAHA

glad you had a laugh xoxo

You denying it or desire to see the logs? HAHAHA It's either you or some other that only needs to ask and I'm providing. HAHAHA It's amazing what one can glean from the logs of this forum. HAHAHA

Are you the sheriff round these parts?

This is so fuckin' funny! LMAO Logged off from one account to log into another account to ask me if I'm the sheriff. HAHAHA Wanna see the logs? Just ask. When I get done, somebody's gonna have egg on their face. HAHAHA I'll just sit here refreshing the page till somebody's brave enough to ask to see the logs. HAHAHA I'll even let it be my 10100th post. HAHAHA

Friends this is a message of an oddysey of learning, one in which you will learn that the internet is frought with perils

only pain come of this, all these altcoins and permissioned ledgers.

so please, take these words with you and may the grace of blockchain jesus shine upond your head, with a thousand tigers

https://i.imgur.com/ITP8fna.jpg

Hey, gumcruise, what are the chances of me extorting 0.5 BTC from you if I keep my month shut and not tell anybody about your alt(s)? HAHAHA PM me if you're interested. HAHAHA But, best make it quick, because I Leroy "Promised" Fodor this community that I would release the proof via the logs if only one person inquires. HAHAHA

ayy_lmao.jpeg

Knew it was obviously a troll, but it was interesting to see what everyone thought :)

You'll probably need to make a new account, though, bud.


Fokin 'av him, Phinn!

Too late, gumcruise, for it looks like mes haz an inquirer.


Give me sec while I format the logs. HAHAHA This is gonna be so much fun. HAHAHA

Gleb wins 1 hr of an indian personal assistants time

pm for detalis

https://i.imgur.com/gZ1x1VE.jpg

http://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/tarpstar.jpg
"The wafer ain't real!"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=412667

http://s2.postimg.org/y1u2lsgqh/tsp.jpg

Does deliciousowl get the same treatment once I supply the logs depicting definitive proof that he and gumcruise are the same person?

~Sheriff Bruno

PS: I just realized that this log I possess could be very, very, very valuable, and I should be careful as to what I show. HAHAHA

Okay, I've formatted the logs so that no other vitals would be depicted. I'm gonna make a fresh pot of coffee first, giving gumowl time enough to see if it's in his heart of hearts to pay my publicly disclosed extortion attempt. HAHAHA

Well, make a thread in Scam Accusations or something and stop withholding the juicy details from us ;)


Coffee? Pff. I'm going to go make some tea, British Detective-style.

Here's the link to make your task that much more easier: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=242584

And, here's the logs... hehehe


gumcruise will gladly pay 0.5 BTC to anybody who first recognizes where he fucked up. HAHAHA

~Sheriff-cum-detective Bruno

Phinn, I must say, I am disappointed.

This is a fucking cheese sandwich. I at least expected ham. And the big surprise is... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCujO6Ujw_o)

---

Firstly, notice that the OP has change. Secondly, seriously, did you not see it? Do you want me to PM you the big-ass clue you missed?

I actually was just going back to edit my post, I have seen it now. ;)

Very impressive. Very, very impressive.

There you go! HAHAHA

Fuckin' funny, ain't it.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nZ43__Aul3o/hqdefault.jpg
"deliciousowl, you have 'splainin' to do!"

The winner receives a brand new 2016 Hocayoli with all the bells and whistles. HAHAHA

So what was wrong with the cover?

The general consensus is that there's nothin' wrong with the cover, but during the brief course of this thread with its OP and title now altered, the author's cover was blown and two negative trusts were doled out to Mr. Hocayoli aka Niceplum aka et al.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1237905

Bitcoins are not only have positive conspiracies but, obviously negative conspiracies too. Especially conspiracies related to mining. The conspiracy is about malwares and conspiracy is like #1 currently.
Bitcoin mining software is now being distributed as malware because using someone else's computer to mine BitCoins is easier than buying a farm of your own mining hardware.

Genius! Now all you need to do is sign up for one of them signature campaigns and you'll be golden.

That is the right answer. You can't be the god of bitcoin and it can't be mastered.

 https://blockchain.info/tx/96dede883008ec8b33033a2d6033b005de502c41fe841fde09c783f77db5e515

enjoy the 0.5 btc

Tune in next time for hopefully even more drama! I don't think I ever said I wouldn't pay  :)

https://i.imgur.com/WeHD0hJ.png

Will not bother rewriting my initial message which i accidentally deleted before posting it but i will make a summary: hahaha...eheheh..apnea...taking a breath and I think the one who is ''mastering'' the whole thing here is ''master'' Phinn -congratz-

Well done filip, better late than never  ;)

How is that the correct answer? You're the master of any Bitcoin you hold!

"2. gain control of" -- the dictionary
"control" -- the thesaurus

---

---

---

19th Post: Correct answer.
66th Post: No correct answers yet.
164th Post: The 9th post was the correct answer.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/40/74/0e/40740e345d37c2e84466d4ab9e9a42eb.jpg
"Let's do some shrooms, Alice, then go down my rabbit hole where I'll fuck your brains out."

What the fuck is Filip thinkin'? I literally handed him the perfect out for all parties involved, but he opted for this obscure route off the beaten path. Fuckin' amazin'!

Haha, this thread turned out to be kind of epic to watch.

What the fuck for paying out now for something that was said on page one? Come on, this is just an action to save your ass and your reputation.

Anyway, kind of lame answer actually.

Seriously, I earnestly tried to save his reputation by providing an out. But now down the rabbit hole we go.

Add...

137th Post: Still no correct answer, hence tossing out the eating of a shoe if no right answer by Christmas.

Bitcoin is made by NSA to rule the world by having backdoors in it.

cry me a river

Have you lost your mother fuckin' mind? I earnestly gave you a logical out for this unfortunately episode due to your esteem reputation and considering your past in Slovakia, but you're opting to toss it all aside. How the fuck do you justify turning a tiny mistake into a full-blown ... ? I'm fuckin' lost for words! Seriously, I'm at a lost. By chance are you back on the shrooms? That's the only logical reason I can come up with for your chosen course of action, dude. Do you have any fuckin' idea as to what the fuck you're doin'? Those two current negative trusts could've easily been removed and overcome, but instead you're jockeying for position to have them stand if not augmented, with the only saving grace being that I don't participate in the practice.

That said, we're goin' try this ONE MORE FUCKIN' TIME! Simply offer up now two earnest apologies: One on this thread for the unfortunate episode, and another on Counterparty's main thread for the use of sockpuppets to advance the concern during its nascent stage. If not, then I'll be prepared to depict your other sockpuppets over there that'd most likely cause a stir. Your call... or stay on the shrooms.

Either Filip or Fodor has 100% gone off the deep end: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=635578 Question: Which one of you guys pushed either one of them too far?  ::) ::) ::)

This did turn into something epic. I was one of the first posters and didn't imagine it would turn out this way. Nine pages later of drawn out mediocrity by a giveaway, which in fact turn out to be a witch hunt.
Good thing justice was served by paying out someone and ending this. But I doubt Gleb will let this rest in knowing the debt has been paid.

Then you'll really like this: From a witch hunt to the insane asylum...

This is the correct answer if I may say so myself but once again we all got scammed with the lure of free Bitcoin.

Ok, so can anyone explain to me why BitcoinStriker doesn't get a neg trust? It's pretty obvious that gummy owl paid to himself/herself or do you believe that someone would spend 0.5 BTC just to save their face (which had no chance of working and it didn't of course). Am I missing anything here?

Nothing physically wrong.
He was stating that the word "Master" is the incorrect term to use when referring to bitcoin.
Not one person can master (Own) all the bitcoins in the world.

Then the chaos insued. ::)

If anyone should get be negged it should be gumcruise
He came on the thread at page 4 and didn't announce that the correct answer was given(posted an almost there with a badger pic) to pay out the reward. I saw him login a few times before his posts. He was probably just laughing at all the fighting over the bounty that he just let it linger on for 4 more pages more.

This thread also exposed the people, who do not read the whole thread and post for the sake of posting. They read the title and post, without reading one of the previous posts. Well done to Gleb for spotting the glitch in the forum Matrix, or this would have gone on forever.  :P

To all posters after this post << Read the thread >> It's not about the title. ^hmf^

Also, the jury's still out as to if Counterparty was exposed viz. the use of sockpuppetry in play to advance their agenda and roping in Patrick Byrne of Overstock.


6 hours, 49 minutes and 40 seconds later, gumcruise posted his very first post in the Counterparty thread pretending to be a NOOB.



While gumcruise was masquerading as a NOOB, his alter ego, deliciousowl, was in charge of maintaining continuity in the same Counterparty thread, along with providing copy writing services for said concern.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2gYf7Fd2wCAJ:counterparty.io/platform/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

As of October 31, 2015, Filip Martinka was still recognized as Community Support. Today, that is no longer the case with his likeness and mention now redacted on Counterparty.io.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/filipmartinka


See this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=670781.msg7590832#msg7590832 (mirror: https://bitcointa.lk/threads/we-working-on-new-service-what-you-thinking-about.335648/)

Then see this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206211.0

ref: https://www.linkedin.com/in/filipmartinka

This is the real answer to the question that the Op said about the cover being wrong so instead of sending it to your alt account it rightfully belongs to me !

1NYaBPmrUjGZ5WA7iiPkDGcd7EBZKNTECW

I don't even remember making this thread. Words of wisdom - if you're trying to OD, dont use cocaine.

Haven't worked for Counterparty for quite a while (way before the posts), and haven't interacted with the team either. They have better things to do than sponsor shitpost pumping. There's no need to drag them into what I'm doing. It doesn't take 221B baker street to figure out that mods have access logs. If I cared or was hired, I would budget in a VPN like the 9000 corporate shills flying around this sphere.

I'm sure if you do more of your incredible detective research you will find that the person I sent 0.5 BTC is indeed a real individual who is not me. The bitcoin network does not have a master or masters, unlike every distributed database out there. Besides, money is circumstantial to me. As are the cuck tears

Whatever mate so you sent it to one of your friends it doesn't matter. You that guy from Memento he had problems with his memory ?  ;D

http://turner-turner.s3.amazonaws.com/db/05/227bf6df475683f0e8be649ec9e9/theplotthickens.jpg

gumcruise started this thread.
I proved that you and gumcruise are the same person.
Both of you told me in your own specail ways to get lost.
You, deliciousowl, paid the 0.5 BTC bounty offered up by gumcruise.
Now, you're claimin' that you don't remember making this thread.
To be fair, I honestly don't remember if I masturbated yesterday or the day before, but I'm pretty certain that I'm overdue given this stiff hard-on that all of a sudden materialized upon reading your post.

Yes, and?

Who is smart enough to tell me what is wrong with Filip?

Doesn't remember making this thread. Pah. Bullshit.

But...


Bro, you can't just leave negative rep because you decided this is the real answer. Take it off.

Can he modify his neg?

If he wants to, I just don't think that his current reason is at all valid. I actually need to modify my negatives soon, I'll just watch this play out for a tiny bit longer before doing that to see any developments in the situation.

Dude that's the real answer ! Gumcruise / Deleciousowl said that before his last post all the answers were wrong and then the only reason he sent the 0.5 was because Bitcoinstriker had posted his Bitcoin address.

If I were to theoretically give everyone in this thread 0.5btc would you guys stop being babies?

Then you would have to give me 1 BTC for real since my answer is correct you can ask the author of the book if you like.

You can do it cheaper by splitting 0.5 BTC to all those that provided an answer (I'm not included) and offer up a sincere apology, exactly what I tried to get you to do before this blew up to what it is now.

EDIT: With apologies to Nobitcoin (whom you may now have to make a special arrangement for).

Do that, and I'll be off your back, with perhaps me tryin' to get some of your negs removed.

Well.
That just happened.

Thanks for the 0.5BTC You paid my Rent  ;D

PS: You guys just want free Bitcoins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Thats a good win , I am behind with mine.
Good fortune.

Hahaha this thread  ;)

Way to go! You were damn near far removed from all that's transpired since you've been paid, but for some odd-ass reason you came here to stick it up anybody's ass with your rent now being paid, coupled with alluding to some being crybabies wanting or deserving free bitcoins.

Here's an offer (you're gonna love this): You pay me 0.5 BTC and I won't definitively connect you to Filip. Deal? I'll even forget that this thread ever existed. HAHAHA

Whos Filip?
And I didnt come here to stick it up anybody's ass, I will stop replying here since I dont like to enter fights.
Sorry if I offended you, just trying to make a living.

You would have done the same, so please.

Filip is the dude who paid your rent while you're trying to make a living here on The #1 Bitcoin Conspiracy Barn.

HAHAHA
https://i.imgur.com/BCDYv.gif

:D


Aaaand he had to turn.

Yes. Clearly. The whole accusation and all of the proof is made-up. Of course.

I'm unsure you've even looked at it. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1237905.0)

To clarify, I don't care about the 0.5 BTC and that part of the accusation is gone now that he's paid it out, but the fact he was a) shilling and b) is denying everything is still there.

I'll tattoo a Deliciousowl on my leg for some btc,lol :P

My answer was wrong ugh

Answer already leaked  ;)


Nah tell us the truth Filip :P

Back to conspiracies. Altho I cannot link BTCStriker to Filip (yet), let's go back a bit shall we?

11/22/2013 - BitcoinStriker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165225) posted this BTC address 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=343104.msg3678995#msg3678995

11/08/2013 - Tymer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139035) posted this BTC address 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255437.msg3520921#msg3520921

 * Scam accusation open against Tymer is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=339534.10

(Back to BitcoinStriker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165225))

11/26/2013 - BitcoinStriker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165225) posted this btc address 1EbEEdJi2pvASwpCTSBZgayGvoK4DQEHUt here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=347707.msg3723470#msg3723470

11/18/2013 - HueSinger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162744) posted this BTC address 1EbEEdJi2pvASwpCTSBZgayGvoK4DQEHUt here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=338156.msg3627590#msg3627590

BTW, HueSinger is an alt of Tymer, as evidenced in the scam accusation as well.

So... Although I cannot prove bitcoinstriker is any particular real life person, I do believe I have proven that he is either in control of, or associated with, known forum scammers accounts.

Anyhow, just thought I'd share that with y'all... Back to the HAHAHAs, much more fun! ;)

Edit - Fixed wrong year bolded above - sorry! Also, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240498.msg12915596;topicseen#msg12915596

If you didn't point this out I would of missed it
Wha.. he paid out to his alt?

Above post shows the crumb trails. Wow just wow  :o

You guys really think im his alt? or I dont even exist?  :(

He actually PM'd me saying I received the bitcoins.
PS: If I was a scammer/alt I would have long sold my account  :D

Dont make false accusations please.

Indeed it did ^^

I've run several (and still do) services here on BitcoinTalk, do I really look like a Scammer?

Huh? What are you waffling about? You should be addressing owlcatz' findings. How come you use the same bitcoin addresses as proven scammer Tymer/HueSinger?

HAHAHA (Sorry, I find that very funny to say out loud)! ;)

He cannot, because he's obviously not a smart scammer, or he wouldn't have made so many mistakes there.

Saddest part -that took me about 1/2 hour on google and bitcointalk, maybe 10 minutes to post it/put it up. I'm not even witch hunting there, I just did some simple history/research and cut and pasted it all.... The downside to being a scammer is that you have to keep your lies, btc addresses, and accounts straight. And as we all know, scammers are not very smart when it comes to such basic types of.. erm.. "OpSec".  :D

Edit - Hey Gleb, did he send you that .5 yet or are you going to drop the final bomb? I don't have the time to dig more than I have tonight. ;)

This is really getting interesting! owlcatz is providing proof of deliciousowl's escapades.

http://www.topiama.com/r/561/the-govt-interpol-and-the-mob-chased-my-family



No, and I don't expect, nor want the 0.5 BTC. My public-facing extortion attempt was provided for humor only.

Don't insult my google-fu or basic intelligence.

I can just open a real scam accusation if you want, but I'm trying to be nice here.

Please. Do tell. Why are  you not those alts given the obvious evidence I have provided? Thanks! :)

BTW, can you sign any of those addresses as your own? If not, why? They are all yours, i have proven that, no?

Coincidence on the the owl shit, but funny, agreed. Anyhow, this shit-show has been entertaining, thanks again. :P

I sincerely was being uber-nice with Filip offering him a simple and respectable way out for the minor misfortune, but thanks to his no-thanks, this episode has exploded in all sorts of directions.

http://www.learnsomething.tips/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/775.jpg

http://dulemba.com/Blogstuff/ColoringPageTuesdays/WiseOwl-sm.jpg
"Who would name an albatross Wisdom?" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisdom_(albatross))

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=665040.msg7503364#msg7503364

https://archive.is/Msh0E

if this delicousowl guy is not Filip, i would eat  your shorts. ok, maybe not, but you get me. ;)

deliciousowl aka Filip Martinka started a thread: [SUCCESSFUL] Copywriting for Cryptocurrencies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1043523)

Can you guess who commented on it?

---

Next, see if you can make heads or tails outta this address: 14Tf35AovvRVURzd623q5i9kry2EW8WzyL

I have the book.  Good book in my opinion.

Ants are insects and insects have six legs...the ants on the cover both have eight legs.

The giveaway is done dude. How'd you get the original post anyways, it was changed awhile ago except for it being quoted a few times. But anyways.
This has turned into a "Justice for all" scenario and all for one who wasted time in this thread.

Noooooooooo, not wasted! Case in point, you'll laugh when you see it: http://web.archive.org/web/20120422184800/http://swingers.theadulthub.com/profile/deliciousowl_looking_for_some_enjoyable.html (see vittles vitals)

Posted before deleted:

Looking for some enjoyable time spent together

Swinger deliciousowl (Male) from Austria, Vienna

I'm a rather progressive and very laid back guy looking to spend time with enchanting ladies who don't want anything too serious. We can easily chill out together and generally have a good time now. Serious relationships just mess with my heart-strings, but there's nothing stopping us from also becoming great friends..

I have rather 'old-school' respect for women, and as such I absolutely won't engage in relationships of complete dominance. If you just think our society is far too serious and want to have fun, send me a message.

Cheers :)

I am looking to hear from Female members

deliciousowl Personal Details
Gender: Male
Age 20
Sexuality Bi-curious
Ethnicity Caucasian
Height 6ft 1in (185 cm)
Build Slim
Hair Dark brown
Body Hair Trimmed
Body Decoration 
Drink Socially
Smoke No
Location Austria, Wien, Vienna
Drugs Some
Cock/Breast size Large
Travel Will travel
Safe Sex  Always
Paid Services No

Ok it is time used wisely  :D
Now this thread is getting interesting  ;)

OMG - lol

Did you see it? size of the one-eye monster

You're twisting again. It was the size of his manboobs.

https://i.imgur.com/3qL0zry.jpg

Here's a real pic of Filip's left tit. You decide, but don't twist it.

Filip was the first to have a Counterparty asset with Niceplum.

Now, check out this dude's first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=926293

Then, read the following: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=984883.msg11160483#msg11160483

(first paragraph after what's quote)

I got the post from the second post in this thread and doctored it a little.  What was the real answer....and why did this thread get so freakin' weird? 

HAHAHA .. Seriously? That old boyfriend excuse? HAHAHA

Everyone act like crazy conspiracy theories in this thread please.

Who paid you to create this thread, and why?
Did you go to Yale?

He/she PMed me too. Unfortunately I didn't get a boyfriend excuse or any other excuse :(

Lolz, still using boyfriend's address "after so many years of bitcoin interest". What a dickboob.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323645.msg3626109#msg3626109
https://archive.is/Gomp8#selection-5129.0-5129.34

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165225
https://archive.is/0cVDj#selection-499.0-499.34

https://meem.link/i/a/ehdgY.jpg
Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image

https://meem.link/i/a/f7az1.jpg
Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image

I also covered that one earlier  :D

Okay, I'm gonna go and jack off now. When you figure out who controls the coindaddy.io domain, please come and join me where we'll have a big ole time. HAHAHA

Why else do you think OP changed the subject line to this.. he is encouraging it!  :D
This is too funny.
The original title was bounty if you can find the problem with this book cover.
But from the looks of it, he will be on a book cover now if Gleb gets his way.
It will called "size of the one-eye monster: The undoing of Deliciousowl"

Wanna take a guess as to who owns coinedbounty.com?: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oFtTTh3wK6YJ:https://whoisology.com/archive_7/coinedtalk.com+&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Click this link showcased, then come and join my circle jerk: https://shutupandtakemycoins.com

It doesn't matter anymore. This was a farce from the beginning.

The one and only ...
Take a bow

Check this out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=993508.0

You guys, I'm flattered.

P.S. Thinking that BitcoinStriker, Owlcatz, etc are my alts is fucking hilarious. I picked the answer I had in mind (as a middle finger to permissioned ledgers) and paid out to a random user who had it first. Now it really is the conspiracy barn.

P.P.S. If you think posting sex stuff is embarrassing please keep in mind I used to do cam shows with my ex, who is a tattoo model (think suicide girls and similar). Imaginary bonus points if you can find those!

Mwah, love y'all. I would like to dedicate this thread to my hero, Diogenes of Sinope.

https://i.imgur.com/mcusO82.jpg

This has to be definite IMHO. The #2nd one was actually posted in 2013 so it was before BitcoinStriker posted that BTC address on his main, and the #2nd post is also unedited so there's no way that he could have been framed here.

The dates on that post are wrong, I never scammed anyone.
Belive it or not, I have no relation to that account or to the OP.
I just posted here randomly with my adress and then out of nowhere I got 0.5 BTC, which I even created a topic below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1239438

The one thing that does connect me to it is the "gay" adress ( the one that contains the word gay in the middle ) which is not my real adress, but a friend of mines who gave up on bitcoins long ago.
Like I said, believe it or not, I have no other way besides saying I didnt scam anyone.

I don't understand your logic here. What, did someone hack into the forum to change the dates?


Oh, come on dude...we hear this all the time and it's just such a lame excuse.

I know it is, its a kiddy excuse.
But, im telling the truth. Believe it or not.

I will continue my services here on BitcoinTalk, its just that I will be seen as a "scammer" when im not.

EDIT: If you check the "gay" wallet that connects me to the alts, and my actual wallet you will see that mine actually has older history than the "gay" one. This is just to prove that my lame excuse is actually true.

EDIT2: I actually went on my skype history and found my old conversation with my so called "lame excuse friend" and it clearly states that that adress is from my friends that he earned money playing on a Minecraft server that actually paid BTC for mining. Its in portuguese but I am willing to put here with image proof.

Is your Portuguese friend named paraipan who's not really dead?

paraipan: This is bullshit! I'm really dead. Do you wanna see the skype logs? If you don't believe the logs, then ask theymos. He'll tell you I'm really dead.

Why are you still deflecting? This address (not the "gay" one):

1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X

is still on your profile. It was also posted by some other user TWO YEARS AGO. That user is a scammer. Same address was also posted by you back then. How do you explain that?

If that was not enough, there is ANOTHER address (the "gay" one) used by you and that same scammer under a different alt (HueSinger), in a similar pattern. Now you're saying it's your friend's address.

Is Tymer/HueSinger your friend? Why are you still using his address two years later?

That is too much to be a coincidence. Even if your story is true you shouldn't be doing any business on this forum if you share a Bitcoin address with a known scammer. You're either complicit or woefully incompetent.

From the desk of I Like Your Style (exact first words of an ex-girlfriend of mine to me when first met at Shoney's restaurant in Nashville in 80's)



http://www.thejamesbondsocialmediaproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/tumblr_lpqx459FNj1qaaqmq.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=253079.msg2952321#msg2952321


https://blockchain.info/tx/ef89af3656a401f9638de13dc48cedc768dd308bdaadaf244fa80db0da157828

1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X  ---->  19AA5K7RfMdjJY4rXz2BdMEytdjQoqJFnz

Man, the destruction here is unreal.

I'm not seeing much proof that actually definitely disproves all the proof against you at this point man, so while you're probably not the OP, you're definitely the alt of Tymer.

And of HueSinger. HAHAHA

http://images.boomsbeat.com/data/images/full/80013/i-didnt-eat-any-sprinkles-jpg.jpg
"I didn't eat the Sprinkles and the 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X bitcoin wallet address isn't mine, so get off my back, bitch!"

Incase you didnt read my post, it clearly states my friend is portuguese...
I never scammed anyone or will. Whatever you brainless people think, I never scammed anyone.

So why did you use 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X multiple times then? Did you happen to be using your (scammer) friend's address over a period of 2 years? That makes absolutely no sense, I don't see why you'd use it for a signature campaign either. I'm sorry, but I just don't see your argument here working.

My Portuguese boyfriend gave me permission to use his 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X bitcoin wallet address as my affiliate ID. He's the bestest!

https://blockchain.info/tx/a1debdf476c05633653e32a26bf30d44a245595e8790320b2baeef26a0984c1c

1BJFjQYb91tsm1gMQJLqGeGk8Kn2i17Vdt  --->  1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X

My Portuguese boyfriend allows me to do all sorts of crazy shit. HAHAHA

From the desk of I Like Your Style (Part Two)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1078148.msg11513252#msg11513252

https://i.imgur.com/hJ6GvbJ.jpg

What happened? It was original Opening Post. We are not discussing this anymore?


And now OP is changed to this:


I think that this thread is not longer needed. As Op is not giving any BTC to anyone. Stop fueling this madness.

https://i.imgur.com/N6KHIaE.jpg

Speaking of madness, how the fuck did you miss that the OP did pay out 0.5 BTC to a random person who's now very much part of topic?

This thread has long since changed to an extension of the following thread, which is a scam accusation. It's more discussing that. I don't think you've actually read the thread and what's happened :-\

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1237905

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=90718.msg3615852#msg3615852

https://i.imgur.com/gBMBviH.jpg

There is an on-going Bitcoin Conspiracy where Gov't agents and shills make honest, innocent members of our community appear to be guilty of scams.
Haven't you heard about it?   :P

Hence justifying my actions. HAHAHA


https://twitter.com/iUploadYuWatch/status/398985276673912833

https://i.imgur.com/EqvTKW8.jpg

Something in the effect of the Skulls?
This is gone in that direction.

It's the illuminati again, isn't it?

/me turns on his record player, X-Files tune starts playing

On the next episode of Bitcoin Conspiracies...

This isn't finished if you read the posts on this thread. If anything its just warming up. Payment was made to a fellow scammer.

http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/x-files/images/7/75/Kindred_Table.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20130212014651
"After dinner, I'll show you two exact what's stored in Amish barns."

http://www.multichanneluniversity.com/facebook-marketing/oculus-rift-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-for-the-awesome/

https://i.imgur.com/bggchGf.jpg

--->  https://www.pinterest.com/pmimzy/boards/ (https://www.pinterest.com/pmimzy/boards/)

--->  https://instagram.com/pmimzy/ (https://instagram.com/pmimzy/)

Snorek my friend! I clearly remember you shilling back in GAW days along with a few other accounts like Slark... which were linked to yourself via Bitcoin addresses (see the irony yet?). You probably wouldn't want Gleb to start looking into your sock drawer LOL. You are extremely lucky that your name didn't surface in EvilPanda's emails (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1033266.msg11175386#msg11175386).

http://s2.dmcdn.net/AD1gH.jpg
"I'm only getting warmed up!"

https://twitter.com/iUploadYuWatch/followers

https://i.imgur.com/VKaUsGp.jpg

https://twitter.com/Tymer0007

http://minecraftcc.com/index.php?search/3559655/

https://i.imgur.com/7xunHa2.jpg



I don't remember my boyfriend making me say that!!!

https://fanbitcoin.com/index.php?topic=467870.msg8009944#msg8009944

https://i.imgur.com/nCLYxKU.jpg

Ok this is getting really confusing. Here is the best I can figure out:

1) Tymer posts their Bitcoin address on Bitcointalk in November 2013.
2) Shortly thereafter Tymer and BitcoinStriker hook up and BitcoinStriker starts using Tymer's address because that's what friends do.
3) BitcoinStriker also uses an address posted by HueSinger, who is either Tymer's alt or maybe there is some kind of threesome going on.
4) Tymer/HueSinger turn out to be scammer(s) but BitcoinStriker is either oblivious to that fact or is ok with it.
5) BitcoinStriker also uses Tymer's username, maybe cross-dresses too.

OR

BitcoinStriker is Tymer is HueSinger.

This is a tough one  ;D

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=139035

See Tymer paid himself via HueSinger via this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=336724.60

email @ demswagop@gmail.com and ask. HAHAHA

Check out this link: http://www.buzzfeed.com/demswagop

This is the definite proof. There's nothing else to say beyond this, as it can't be refuted. There is absolutely no reason BitcoinStriker would have an account called Tymer in multiple places if he was not Tymer, so he must be him. So he is a scammer, unless he was hacked in 2014 and hasn't realized yet. ;)

https://scifiinterfaces.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/butwaittheresmore.jpeg

Tymer is char728293. HAHAHA

Okay....I am so confused!  What are the rules of this game.  We figure out who's using whose bitcoin address, we associate them with an alternate username, and then we accuse them of scamming?  If our accusations are proven then we win some bitcoin?  What do the alternative lifestyles have to do with the subject?

So, so confusing!  I think the whole thing is one big conspiracy to avoid being "outed" or something!  Right?

Actually no, char728292 belongs to the so called "lame friend" of mine.  ;)
Keep digging

Touche  ;)

This thread can go on for ever at this rate.
Has some one created another thread on this in accusations already?
Maybe you should consider creating one in your innocence.

Two, in accusations. Both mine, you can probably find them on the front page of Scam Accusations if you have a look, or you can find the one about BitcoinStriker by looking at my post history.

See it already:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240498.msg12914427#msg12914427

You started this already and he is being his own defense lawyer.
So lock this thread mods!  ;D
The fight is on in accusations!

EDIT: Wrong thread  ;D

Do Not Ever Interrupt GLEB!
I love that new serie (the BTC-files) watchin' it every day!   :-*

Sorry for being gone so long, but had to go see a doctor. He informed me that my problems lie with BitcoinTalk, so I sought out another opinion. Luckily, for me, Dr. Fodor, an expert in this field, informed me that there's nothin' wrong with me with the exception that I should change my cum-stained underwear more often.

Stay tuned, for my next post is a reply to the following post:

You should see the developments on the thread in Scam Accusations against BitcoinStriker. You might even be able to catch a bit of THC that's been pumped into the air of the thread, it really is a great way to get a bit of Mary Jane in your body.

I'll check it out after I pen my next post here actin' as a meth habit, looking forward to washin' it down with some THC.

Please pay close attention because there's more than two dots that I'm about to connect:

https://twitter.com/2boomgamers/status/203524885916553216

https://i.imgur.com/3nldMM2.jpg

http://www.minecraftforum.net/members/Tymer007/posts?page=3
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/archive/mojang-account-minecraft-net/1942861-help#c1

https://i.imgur.com/GcHU6mt.jpg

http://www.minecraftforum.net/members/Tymer007/posts?page=3

https://i.imgur.com/LsRU23F.jpg

Note the email address: erectmaverick41@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/FreePremiumAccountDaily/posts/424651934266296

https://i.imgur.com/h8lrufa.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/qk20qxy.jpg

BitcoinStriker  =  Tymer0007  =  erectmaverick41@hotmail.com  =  char728293

Bonus Image: https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=7765.5

https://i.imgur.com/E9p5nq0.jpg

Apologies for the connecting-too-many-dots post above, for I think the doctor probed me too deeply.

Here it is with ONLY one dot: http://minecraftcc.com/index.php?threads/post-your-bitcoin-address-here.4614/page-97

https://i.imgur.com/kC78dFd.jpg

I know, it's gonna be a stretch to connect BitcoinStriker to 1EbEEdJi2pvASwpCTSBZgayGvoK4DQEHUt, but until proof is some day provided, we'll simply pretend it's his.

Nevermind about locking this thread. This stuff is gold!   ;)

The BTC-Files! HAHAH :D

Definitely one of the more amusing scam busts ever. Great job, busters.
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/270336_o.gif

Hey, I'm going to have to report you to the Portugese Government for failing to create a safe space for 12 year olds by not referring to it as the "address with gay in it" now. You can't be using words like 1EbEEdJi2pvASwpCTSBZgayGvoK4DQEHUt around the kiddies, man, it's just not appropriate. Shame on you.

lol,i just noticed the "gay" part. aha

Dear respectful btctalkers
To continue watching the next episode of the BTC-files you have to enter this new frequency:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240498 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240498)
Sorry for the inconvenience :P

For the last time, Im not Tymer which is the alt of HueSinger which is the alt of BitcoinStriker... Oh wait that's me: Alexandre Ferreira Martins Paiva

Go Gleb! Go Gleb!

It's worst than you think! Said activities are taken place at the Swap Hut.

This is truly a work of art. This post already ranks for his name on google.

Gleb, I think this is a hint that you neglected Filip's SEO.

Filip's a tad lucky that I have no cause to post other stuff 'bout him, but if anybody's so inclined to do such, simply search his real full name via Google News. Filip's full name plus Bitcoin via Google seems to rank fairly well. HAHAHA Also, I'm almost certain I could connect him to Silk Road. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have schrooms to deliver. HAHAHA

What if Satoshi Nakamoto was the NSA? what if bitcoin was all a plot to control people and to have them trust on a software who would run their lives?
What if Bitcoin is the beggining of SKYNET?

Maybe Bitcoin is not NSA but CIA its another trick in order to keep people from causing trouble like introducing Heroin into the ghettos. Another magical trick in order to keep us distracted from what the governments are really doing.

Then it is easy to catch the scammers, the criminals that demand bounties in bitcoin and stop the media from spamming this random stupid story over and over (yesterday I read another bbc article about a btc bounty)

i see wikileaks donation address here https://blockchain.info/address/1HB5XMLmzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v , wow almost 4k btc transaction.
one of wikileaks founder is satoshi nakamotoo?