Bitcoin Forum

Alternate cryptocurrencies => Altcoin Discussion => Topic started by: qwizzie on September 03, 2016, 08:11:53 PM



Title: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: qwizzie on September 03, 2016, 08:11:53 PM
http://cryptohustle.com/the-battle-over-online-privacy

https://i.imgur.com/wd9rPib.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1KrbmAL.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/psmxjGw.jpg

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet and that Dash privacy solution is totally optional.  

Interesting article from Alan Struna (please read it completely), it could have huge implications for a certain cryptocurrency that just got added as currency on darknet.
Direct association with darknet = Full attention of the FBI

Update :

Direct link to EFF article that was quoted: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government
Credits : alanshore

I suspect this will provide some need for discussion, so please discuss  ;D



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 03, 2016, 08:44:11 PM
http://cryptohustle.com/the-battle-over-online-privacy

https://i.imgur.com/wd9rPib.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1KrbmAL.jpg

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet... 

Interesting article, could have huge implications for a certain cryptocurrency that just got added as currency on darknet.
Direct association with darknet = Full attention of the FBI


Quote
Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet... 

sour grapes?

or

losers and quitters..didn't even have the chance to perform.

XMR cryptonote technology is on stage now...we will see if it can hold its defenses...go anonymous crypto currency! go monero!


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 03, 2016, 08:44:27 PM
can we please just put volyova on ignore, he already proven to be a troll and he is cluttering up this forum
with his troll posts and the replies he get.

thank you.

Thanks for the heads up, done!  ;)

http://cryptohustle.com/the-battle-over-online-privacy

https://i.imgur.com/wd9rPib.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/1KrbmAL.jpg

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet... 

Nice catch here, very interesting, it would partialy explain some of the recent exit pumps.

On another note what's up with BTC? Any guesses?

I have said it many times... We should never court or market to the darknet or Deep Web.  That is not where our future lies.   Let others cater to that market if they wish.

you must have a new variety in your vineyard called "sour grapes" LOL

i bet it is the darknet or deep web who wanted the technology, so they must be the one doing the courting hehe

anyway, if darknet people wanted to use dash they will use it if they want to, there's nothing you can do about it. so if you don't want people to be anonymous/private, why not remove private send and stop your masternodes from mixing coins?.. and then dash will become just like any other shitcoin out there with fast coin transfers and shiny GUI?  haha


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 03, 2016, 08:47:20 PM
so much whining here  ;D

makes me wonder... when darkcoin took/stole dashcoin's name, darkcoin should have migrated to dashcoin's superior cryptonote blockchain instead of just taking the name...maybe darkcoin aka dash now might still have a chance against monero haha

it's over RIP xcoin/darkcoin/dash... back to 5 million market cap :P.

Why are you still hanging round here?
Because he (and many others in the crypto-space) want to see the DASH network destroyed.

It's just the fighting fase... you know what's next  ;)

yeah keep fighting..and oh, dream on guys .... here's another song for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRNSeuvzlM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRNSeuvzlM)

Every time I look in the forum
All these lines on my thread getting clearer
The past is gone
It went by like dusk to dawn

Isn't that the way?
Everybody's got their dues in life to pay

Yeah, I know nobody knows
Where it comes and where it goes
I know it's everybody's sin
You got to lose to know how to win

Half my life's in DASH' written pages
Live and learn from trolls and from mermaids
You know it's true
All the things come back to you


DASH with me, DASH for the year
DASH for the laughter, DASH for the tear
DASH with me if it's just for today
Maybe tomorrow the good Lord will take you away

Yeah, DASH with me, DASH for the year
DASH for the laughter, DASH for the tear
DASH with me if it's just for today
Maybe tomorrow the good Lord will take you away

Dream on, dream on, dream on,
Dream yourself a dream come true
Dream on, dream on, dream on,
Dream until your dreams come true

Dream on, dream on, dream on,
Dream on, dream on,
Dream on, dream on, ah

DASH with me, DASH for the year
DASH for the laughter, DASH for the tear
DASH with me if it's just for today
Maybe tomorrow, the good Lord will take you away
DASH with me, DASH for the year
DASH for the laughter, DASH for the tear
DASH with me just for today
Maybe tomorrow, the good Lord will take you away...


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: qwizzie on September 03, 2016, 08:49:40 PM
for the sake of this thread's readability, it would be nice to stay somewhat on topic and avoid unnecessary long posts.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 03, 2016, 09:27:01 PM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 03, 2016, 09:29:49 PM
Please note, I say this with much love to the Dash community as I have witnessed you taking the brunt of the attacks so much of this does not apply directly to you. As this is a plea for both communities and is also posted in the Monero thread, I feel the need to post it here as well.


I am a long time lurker and holder of both Monero and Dash. I have made a lot of money holding both but making money has never been the goal. 80% of my cash worth is spread between both currencies because I do not like the direction in which our world is moving and I want to ensure that myself and the people I care about are well taken care of when the facade that now envelopes our society is finally lifted.

I have a plea for both the Monero and Dash communities.


The world markets are at all time highs, standing on a cliff, held steady only by increasingly desperate central banks and supported by governments that have yet to realize that neo-classical economics has failed. Well-intentioned but poorly executed ideas such as the ACA and Eurozone Refugee Policy continue to disintegrate and the media conglomerates appear dedicated to perpetuating fear so they can pad their margins. Our elected leaders are now preying upon this fear to usurp our freedoms and those campaigning for office are using this fear to manipulate their way into power. It is clear that the status quo will not change willingly and will turn to increasingly extreme measures to maintain their control. Our world is in a precarious situation but our involvement in Monero and Dash does allow us to do something about it.

I believe that until recently, true freedom and democracy has not been possible. It is only now, due to advances in technology and novel ideas such as the blockchain and DAO's, that we finally have the tools to ensure our freedom, regardless of what legislation our corrupt and misguided governments decide to pass in the public's "best interest".

The only way to solve many of the problems we face is to create technology that is impervious to government intervention. Where the people get to choose how they wish to transact and what they choose to purchase in complete privacy. I know there is continuous debate regarding which technology is more secure, or scalable, or a multitude of other things but I think the one thing both communities can agree on is they are both vast improvements over fiat transactions and even bitcoin.

The announcement from Jaxx regarding the required removal of Dash from their iOS wallet is a perfect example of the uphill battle anonymous currencies are facing.

https://twitter.com/diiorioanthony/status/771017555930705920
https://twitter.com/diiorioanthony/status/771033721881362432

While both technologies are taking different approaches to creating a digital equivalent of cash, the greatest hurdle they face will be adoption and this will not happen if the current powers that be continue to discriminate against them. This hurdle becomes a lot smaller if both communities work together.

Right now, the combined marketcap of Monero and Dash is ~200 mil which is miniscule compared to the entrenched systems. In fact, the entire marketcap of the top 100 crypto's is only 11 billion. I trade the S&P eMini during the day and on average, in the last minute of regular market trading, 50+ billion dollars worth of contracts will change hands. In one minute, five times more money changes hands than the top 100 cryptos combined marketcap.

Monero and Dash are currently the two rats in the corner fighting over a crumb while the corrupt banks and remittance companies sit at the table and feast on the entire pie. If we work together, we can have a real shot at taking a larger slice of the pie (while actually benefiting society) and believe me, there is more than enough to go around.

If you are just in Monero or Dash to make a quick buck, I imagine you stopped reading some time ago. If you are still here, I urge you to expand your scope of thinking and imagine what could be accomplished if both currencies were to cooperate.

If I dare to dream, I would envision a future where there are XMR and DASH trading pairs on exchanges, where we encourage others to use both networks, where the communities help test each others releases, where they combine forces to help both get added as payment options for major services and where ideas on how to improve both currencies are openly shared and discussed. If anyone is open to creating a new bitcointalk thread for mutual and friendly discussion of both cryptos, I think that would be a great first step.

We are all in this battle together and I believe the only way we can fail is by remaining divided. The real enemy is the entrenched systems that dictate our lives. Please do your part to help create a more cooperative environment, regardless of your opinion on which technology is superior.

well said.. but you should  consider the element of competition..it is healthy overall, each side pointing flaws and making/innovating to outclass each other.

i dont see a way to make them work together since they have different blockchain tech, dash is from bitcoin and monero is cryptonote.

and i like you to think if there is a winner, i mean there is only one anon coin used by people, the development and capitalization will also become concentrated to one.

the weaker tech should be discarded because it will be just pulling down crypto advancement in general.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: obit33 on September 03, 2016, 09:32:41 PM

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet and that Dash privacy solution is totally optional.  



I lolled so hard at this, wtf, this is the best joke ever...

come on man, you can't be serious...

now Dash is better cuz the privacy is optional... newsflash, xmr's privacy is optional too, with the viewkey...

you know why those dnm's didn't choose Dash, cuz the privacy features are inherently flawed, not optional, but flawed...


I really wonder if you were able to keep a straight face when starting this topic... I lolled really hard, thank you!

best regards


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: flipme on September 03, 2016, 09:36:41 PM
You forgot to mention
VCASH
ZCASH isn't finished, Monero and DASH have bad limitations.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: qwizzie on September 03, 2016, 09:40:39 PM
You forgot to mention
VCASH
ZCASH isn't finished, Monero and DASH have bad limitations.

sorry flipme, but that article of which i put the link up in my first post is not written by me and it just
refers to those three cryptocurrencies.



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: qwizzie on September 03, 2016, 09:49:56 PM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

thank you for that link, i will add it to my first post


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: Abiky on September 03, 2016, 10:16:24 PM
You forgot to mention
VCASH
ZCASH isn't finished, Monero and DASH have bad limitations.

Yeah it will be a race among which will be the most popular anon crypto and the most accepted among darknet markets. In my opinion, I think that most of them are full of hype. However, it is up to debate whenever any of these cryptocurrencies truly deliver strong anonymity or not. I have the feeling that once ZCash blockchain comes to the public, it will be full of hype and we will expect to see massive pumps during its first days. No offense, it is just my opinion.  ::)


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 04, 2016, 12:46:58 AM
Here is a great interview with Snowden, Greenwald and Noam Chomsky discussing privacy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L60LU8LIi0M

When speaking about anonymous cryptos to outsiders and newcomers that are concerned with the implications of online anonymous purchases, this is a great link to send them.

Edward Snowden, Glen Greenwald and Noam Chomsky are examples of how we should conduct ourselves. Maybe you do not agree with or like one of the individuals but the way they conduct themselves is always productive. Even when I have seen them disagree with other people or opinions, their conduct remains professional because they see the bigger picture and they know what is at stake.

We too can have professional conversations about competing technologies but right now, the way the conversations have been going leaves much to be wanted.

If Snowden, Greenwald or Chomsky were to look through these forums and see some of the comments, they would be extremely disappointed that we are at the forefront of amazing technology and are squandering this opportunity to have a profound change on our civilization due to our greed of wanting our individual coin to succeed and the others fail.

There are many privacy and encryption technologies that compete and manage to do so without the emotional and childish outbursts that plague nearly every coins thread.

Think about this. Several have stated our battle for online private transactions is only beginning and I completely agree. We haven't faced the full onslaught of a government attack on our networks or the transfer of fiat to anonymous currencies. When that time comes though, the only way we will succeed is through multiple communities working together. We will need redundancies in place in case one currency falls so that at the very least, online private transactions can continue.

If you can't see this, please expand your scope of thinking and realize just as we need decentralized currencies, we need decentralized "options" of which currencies to use. There can never be just one or it creates the very same problem it was created to fix.


Thank you so much for creating this thread qwizzie. I look forward to seeing how this develops and will be thrilled if it results in some new ideas for improving Dash, Monero and Zcash or at the very least helps to foster a new sense of solidarity.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: generalizethis on September 04, 2016, 01:11:19 AM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

It's called vetting, and no it's not the bad guy in this little play; you get 1984 when you don't mercilessly analyze systems for flaws--or claims that aren't in line with reality. 


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: bbc.reporter on September 04, 2016, 01:20:52 AM
You forgot to mention
VCASH
ZCASH isn't finished, Monero and DASH have bad limitations.

It is very easy to say that this or that is "limited" without first explaining how vcash's chain blender anonymizes its transactions. If you can give us a simple lay man's term explanation, that will be appreciated. Then we could all start discussing vcash and its comparison with the rest.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dinofelis on September 04, 2016, 05:25:44 AM

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet and that Dash privacy solution is totally optional.  


This is a big no-go in anonymity: it shouldn't be optional.   This is like saying that anonymity on the public road is optional: you can put a bag over your head when walking in the street.  True, but you will be easily spotted, with your bag over your head.

Anonymity shouldn't be an option, but it should be automatic, and *lifting* anonymity should be an option.  This is like the old paper mail system: you can send an envelope and you don't need to put your sender's address on the envelope.  You may do so if you wish ; you can write whatever you want on the return address if you wish.  The contents is private too, unless one opens the envelope.  So MOST paper mail was private in some sense.  You weren't a suspect because you put your letter in an envelope or because you wrote "Jack Johnson" on the sender's place.  Everybody put their letters in a closed envelope, so yours didn't stand out.

With a bag on your head in the street, you stand out as a suspect.

With e-mail, this failed.  e-mail was open and clear for all routers and servers.  When PGP came, as an OPTION, it wasn't generally adopted.  Not many people use PGP.  Some do, and I'm pretty sure they stand out as suspect.

e-mail totally screwed the privacy of paper letters.  All the privacy problems that occurred with e-mail are due to the fact that privacy was only a option.  Hell, ask Hillary !   If we're not careful, bitcoin is like e-mail.  Dash is like bitcoin, providing something like PGP for those who "have to hide something".




Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 04, 2016, 05:43:59 AM
dash "partly private" blockchain is a security hole itself

Ariel, I'm going to be polite.

You do not consider that the Monero block chain is unverifiable because it is completely opaque. If you want to "trust the math" and believe no loop hole will ever exist allowing coins to be inserted, changing the supply of coins, or that "the math" will never have an unforeseen hole where transactions will be detangled, something that can't happen with private send, that is fine.

However, an open blockchain, with inputs and outputs that can be seen with the naked eye, and verified is one of the cornerstones of Bitcoin's brilliance.  And Dash kept that while also providing privacy.

Because of that, I personally think Dash's privacy feature is far superior to Monero's.  Dash is solid.  You know where everything stands at any time.


And yet, once again, Dash's superior privacy, fungibility and verifiable blockchain is only one of the many features Dash provides in creating a world class currency that will be used by a majority of the human population in only half a generation's time.  But good luck with Monero, but if you want to use your funds for illegal purposes, please use a minimum 8 rounds of mixing in Dash, and leave the Monero at home.  I really don't trust it, and fear for your safety.

You think you know it all, you think you can trust "the math" but these cryptographic proofs have weaknesses that can be exploited.  Some have been discovered, as in secp256r1, and there could be other weaknesses that have yet to be revealed.



Quote
If you want to "trust the math"

yes, we want to trust the math. that is what cryptography is for..is what crypto currency is for.

back to privacy..
i can compare dash blockchain now to the internet, at first you thought that the internet is private but then it is not...then tor was created, it made the internet "PARTLY PRIVATE" ... didn't we heard of government being able to successfully trace in tor? yes it did happen and it is in the news.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: coinism on September 04, 2016, 11:05:33 AM
can't they all coexist?


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: smoothie on September 04, 2016, 11:29:16 AM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

The majority of discussion has been using facts to base claims about Dash and Monero.

"Bashing" is the term used when the opposing side of the discussion does not like how the discussion is going so they play the victim card.



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: bbc.reporter on September 04, 2016, 12:30:49 PM
can't they all coexist?

My opinion is they can but they won't. :D It also better if developers compete with each other so they can improve their coins much faster and come up with the best open source technology for everyone to use in the cryprosphere. Also the drama is very entertaining. ;D


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dinofelis on September 04, 2016, 12:40:39 PM
can't they all coexist?

My opinion is they can but they won't. :D It also better if developers compete with each other so they can improve their coins much faster and come up with the best open source technology for everyone to use in the cryprosphere. Also the drama is very entertaining. ;D

As there is always an existential doubt in cryptography, it is usually best not to have all eggs in one basket.  But the most important thing is that *finally* the anonymity/fungibility aspect starts to get taken seriously, after all the bells and whistles of smart contracts and other stuff.    The anonymity thing (or lack thereof) with bitcoin is always what refrained me from being too overly enthusiastic of bitcoin itself.  I saw it as a step back as compared to cash, and a very dangerous one, because of the graving in stone for eternity.   30 years later, all your transactions of the past are still visible.  People don't seem to realize how terrible that can be, especially because we don't know how the world powers will evolve.  This is something that chilled my spine when I realized it.



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: coinism on September 04, 2016, 01:09:14 PM
can't they all coexist?

My opinion is they can but they won't. :D It also better if developers compete with each other so they can improve their coins much faster and come up with the best open source technology for everyone to use in the cryprosphere. Also the drama is very entertaining. ;D


bet on all of them seems to be the trick and enjoy the entertainment as you go along:)


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 04, 2016, 11:00:59 PM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

The majority of discussion has been using facts to base claims about Dash and Monero.

"Bashing" is the term used when the opposing side of the discussion does not like how the discussion is going so they play the victim card.




A lot of people appear to have missed the point in my original post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg16103807#msg16103807) asking both communities to be more cooperative. They can still compete and use that competition to innovate and they can still critique the other technology. What I believe needs to happen though for cryptos in general to succeed is to do this in a more professional and jovial manner.

You are correct that some of the discussions have used facts and have been productive but a lot of the conversations have also been without facts and very childish.

Here is just one of many examples that I do believe is "bashing" as it does not reference facts, evidence or data of any kind and instead uses verbiage like "scam" and "snakeoil".

https://imgur.com/a/IiwTb

Here is another example where "DashHole" is used.

https://imgur.com/a/fl4jX

It is a known problem that members of the Monero community actively make aggressive claims about other technology without providing evidence to back these claims up. In the last example, one of the Monero team is quoted in stating they cannot control members of their community. That is true and I believe stifling free speech always leads to bad outcomes so that is not something I am advocating for in anyway.

The one thing that can be done is for someone from the Monero team to make a statement that they do not support members of their community making claims without providing evidence. They could make that post in this thread and it won't have to be mentioned again. That way at least myself and others in the Monero community, including the aggressors, will know that the Monero team does not support this behavior and then hopefully we can move forward together in advocating for the adoption of cryptos.

By remaining silent, they are endorsing this behavior and it is off putting and unprofessional.

I have been investing and watching both Monero and Dash for over two years and am continuously embarrassed to be part of a community that acts so childish when so much is at stake. I have been vocal as of late as I am becoming increasingly worried at the direction our society is moving and believe that cooperation is more necessary now than it ever has been.


Speaking of stifling free speech, I was extremely disappointed that my plea to the Monero and Dash communities was censored on the Monero subreddit: http://imgur.com/a/Cqnz1

My plea is still on the bitcointalk Monero thread which is great but I'm not sure I understand why it was removed on the Monero subreddit.

It is a little hypocritical that the Monero team believes it cannot control certain members of its community but then actively censors other members of that same community that are only trying to bring a stop to the unproductive hostility.


I believe both communities should let the past be the past and open a new door towards cooperation but we cannot do that without the leaders setting an example for others to follow.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 05, 2016, 12:04:54 AM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

The majority of discussion has been using facts to base claims about Dash and Monero.

"Bashing" is the term used when the opposing side of the discussion does not like how the discussion is going so they play the victim card.




A lot of people appear to have missed the point in my original post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg16103807#msg16103807) asking both communities to be more cooperative. They can still compete and use that competition to innovate and they can still critique the other technology. What I believe needs to happen though for cryptos in general to succeed is to do this in a more professional and jovial manner.

You are correct that some of the discussions have used facts and have been productive but a lot of the conversations have also been without facts and very childish.

Here is just one of many examples that I do believe is "bashing" as it does not reference facts, evidence or data of any kind and instead uses verbiage like "scam" and "snakeoil".

https://imgur.com/a/IiwTb

Here is another example where "DashHole" is used.

https://imgur.com/a/fl4jX

It is a known problem that members of the Monero community actively make aggressive claims about other technology without providing evidence to back these claims up. In the last example, one of the Monero team is quoted in stating they cannot control members of their community. That is true and I believe stifling free speech always leads to bad outcomes so that is not something I am advocating for in anyway.

The one thing that can be done is for someone from the Monero team to make a statement that they do not support members of their community making claims without providing evidence. They could make that post in this thread and it won't have to be mentioned again. That way at least myself and others in the Monero community, including the aggressors, will know that the Monero team does not support this behavior and then hopefully we can move forward together in advocating for the adoption of cryptos.

By remaining silent, they are endorsing this behavior and it is off putting and unprofessional.

I have been investing and watching both Monero and Dash for over two years and am continuously embarrassed to be part of a community that acts so childish when so much is at stake. I have been vocal as of late as I am becoming increasingly worried at the direction our society is moving and believe that cooperation is more necessary now than it ever has been.


Speaking of stifling free speech, I was extremely disappointed that my plea to the Monero and Dash communities was censored on the Monero subreddit: http://imgur.com/a/Cqnz1

My plea is still on the bitcointalk Monero thread which is great but I'm not sure I understand why it was removed on the Monero subreddit.

It is a little hypocritical that the Monero team believes it cannot control certain members of its community but then actively censors other members of that same community that are only trying to bring a stop to the unproductive hostility.


I believe both communities should let the past be the past and open a new door towards cooperation but we cannot do that without the leaders setting an example for others to follow.



As the topic of why masternode owners are likely long term investors was brought up, I'm happy to chime in.

During the day I'm a derivatives trader. I really don't trust our markets so I never hold futures contracts for very long and whenever I do invest in something for the long term, I am always looking for the most yield with the least amount of risk.

Currently, I could park my money in treasuries, bonds, dividend paying stocks or even write my own options. What becomes fairly apparent when looking into all of these though is that the yield on both the safer and riskier investments is so low right now that at this point in time, they don't make a lot of sense unless those are your only options.

While Dash is not the only crypto I hold, it is currently the only one that does offer an inviting yield on your investment. On my masternodes I currently make 10% annual ROI. About 1.75% of that does get taken away whenever I convert masternode payments back to fiat due to various exchange fees but the remaining 8.25% is still a fantastic return.

While I know this is anecdotal evidence, I do think its safe to assume that a good portion of other masternode owners have performed a similar assessment of what will offer the greatest "guaranteed" ROI and chose to invest in Dash and its masternodes because of this. All investments have risks and your initial investment could go down in value. Dash is no exception but considering that I actually have voting power as to the direction of my investment, I feel comfortable holding Dash for the long term over lets say Intel or Apple stock where I could be earning a much smaller dividend with lower risk but would not have the same voting power.

Without incentivized nodes, I am beginning to doubt the long term viability of other currencies as I think they will eventually face the same problems that bitcoin is now. I really hope more currencies begin to incorporate incentivized nodes and I know there are several that are.


 ::) i know you have investments in dash masternodes..and threats to dash is also a threat to your investment...i understand that.

BUT..you cannot strip humans of their emotions.. i recommend putting on your "dash t-shirt" and drink your coffee from "dash mug" and let's have some fun  ;)


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 05, 2016, 12:43:28 AM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

The majority of discussion has been using facts to base claims about Dash and Monero.

"Bashing" is the term used when the opposing side of the discussion does not like how the discussion is going so they play the victim card.




A lot of people appear to have missed the point in my original post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg16103807#msg16103807) asking both communities to be more cooperative. They can still compete and use that competition to innovate and they can still critique the other technology. What I believe needs to happen though for cryptos in general to succeed is to do this in a more professional and jovial manner.

You are correct that some of the discussions have used facts and have been productive but a lot of the conversations have also been without facts and very childish.

Here is just one of many examples that I do believe is "bashing" as it does not reference facts, evidence or data of any kind and instead uses verbiage like "scam" and "snakeoil".

https://imgur.com/a/IiwTb

Here is another example where "DashHole" is used.

https://imgur.com/a/fl4jX

It is a known problem that members of the Monero community actively make aggressive claims about other technology without providing evidence to back these claims up. In the last example, one of the Monero team is quoted in stating they cannot control members of their community. That is true and I believe stifling free speech always leads to bad outcomes so that is not something I am advocating for in anyway.

The one thing that can be done is for someone from the Monero team to make a statement that they do not support members of their community making claims without providing evidence. They could make that post in this thread and it won't have to be mentioned again. That way at least myself and others in the Monero community, including the aggressors, will know that the Monero team does not support this behavior and then hopefully we can move forward together in advocating for the adoption of cryptos.

By remaining silent, they are endorsing this behavior and it is off putting and unprofessional.

I have been investing and watching both Monero and Dash for over two years and am continuously embarrassed to be part of a community that acts so childish when so much is at stake. I have been vocal as of late as I am becoming increasingly worried at the direction our society is moving and believe that cooperation is more necessary now than it ever has been.


Speaking of stifling free speech, I was extremely disappointed that my plea to the Monero and Dash communities was censored on the Monero subreddit: http://imgur.com/a/Cqnz1

My plea is still on the bitcointalk Monero thread which is great but I'm not sure I understand why it was removed on the Monero subreddit.

It is a little hypocritical that the Monero team believes it cannot control certain members of its community but then actively censors other members of that same community that are only trying to bring a stop to the unproductive hostility.


I believe both communities should let the past be the past and open a new door towards cooperation but we cannot do that without the leaders setting an example for others to follow.



As the topic of why masternode owners are likely long term investors was brought up, I'm happy to chime in.

During the day I'm a derivatives trader. I really don't trust our markets so I never hold futures contracts for very long and whenever I do invest in something for the long term, I am always looking for the most yield with the least amount of risk.

Currently, I could park my money in treasuries, bonds, dividend paying stocks or even write my own options. What becomes fairly apparent when looking into all of these though is that the yield on both the safer and riskier investments is so low right now that at this point in time, they don't make a lot of sense unless those are your only options.

While Dash is not the only crypto I hold, it is currently the only one that does offer an inviting yield on your investment. On my masternodes I currently make 10% annual ROI. About 1.75% of that does get taken away whenever I convert masternode payments back to fiat due to various exchange fees but the remaining 8.25% is still a fantastic return.

While I know this is anecdotal evidence, I do think its safe to assume that a good portion of other masternode owners have performed a similar assessment of what will offer the greatest "guaranteed" ROI and chose to invest in Dash and its masternodes because of this. All investments have risks and your initial investment could go down in value. Dash is no exception but considering that I actually have voting power as to the direction of my investment, I feel comfortable holding Dash for the long term over lets say Intel or Apple stock where I could be earning a much smaller dividend with lower risk but would not have the same voting power.

Without incentivized nodes, I am beginning to doubt the long term viability of other currencies as I think they will eventually face the same problems that bitcoin is now. I really hope more currencies begin to incorporate incentivized nodes and I know there are several that are.


 ::) i know you have investments in dash masternodes..and threats to dash is also a threat to your investment...i understand that.

BUT..you cannot strip humans of their emotions.. i recommend putting on your "dash t-shirt" and drink your coffee from "dash mug" and let's have some fun  ;)


I have made it clear from the beginning that most of my cash worth is spread between Monero and Dash. More recently, I've been making a whole lot more money in Monero than I have Dash but making money has never been the point. The ROI that Dash masternodes offer is just a bonus, as is the money I have been making in Monero, both of which I still plan to hold long term. I do not want a "dash t-shirt" or a "dash mug". I just want everyone to expand their scope of thinking and see everyone in the crypto space as being part of the same group and begin to treat each other with respect. While it is impossible to strip humans of their emotions and would be counter-productive to do so, I think we can hold everyone to a higher standard.

I believe in both currencies and the point that everyone continues to miss, including you, is that this is much larger than "my" investments.

This is about changing the way our species makes transactions and about giving everyone freedom which I really do not think we have been able to experience in our entire history. Decentralization was not technically feasible until just recently and now we have a chance to change the underlying systems of our civilization. But in order to do this, we have to overcome a lot of barriers and will have to engage with a lot of organizations that have billions of dollars at stake if the status quo was to change. They are not going to give up easily and quite frankly have not even started to fight us. The combined marketcap of the top 100 cryptos is only 12 billion. Do you know what that is to Goldman Sachs? 3 months worth of earnings. Do you know what that is to Apple? 1 / 50th of their market cap. They have not started to fight us because we are barely a threat.

We will be though and that is when the real battle will begin and I believe that is right around the corner. We need to get our ducks in a row and stop our in fighting so we can get organized for what lies ahead. Constructive criticism is great. Name calling, unsubstantiated claims and posts without links to evidence or that are phrased in an aggressive or childish way only serve to widen our divisions when we need to be doing the exact opposite.

Would any of this behavior be tolerated in the business world? Would any of this be tolerated at any reputable firm? The answer is clearly no and these are the very entrenched systems that we are up against. They will walk all over us as we try to push adoption if we do not change the way we present ourselves.

There is nothing "fun" about the direction our world is heading nor is there anything "fun" about the way that millions of people suffer under the existing monopolies of banks and remittance companies. I believe that each persons life is inherently meaningless and that it is up to the individual to give meaning to their own life through their actions. We, as supporters of cryptos have an opportunity to make a real change and I urge everyone to think of the big picture and act accordingly.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: Sir Alpha_goy on September 05, 2016, 12:51:41 AM
More like "The battle of the scams"

Who can make the most monkeys fling their poo the furthest.

The only way to liquidate anon coins is to give all your credentials to an exchange.

DNA, ip, or ID.

PICK YOUR SERVILE POISON.

How ironic.

Exchange one handler for another.

If you want your old handler you can keep your old handler.......


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 05, 2016, 01:04:01 AM
More like "The battle of the scams"

Who can make the most monkeys fling their poo the furthest.

The only way to liquidate anon coins is to give all your credentials to an exchange.

DNA, ip, or ID.

PICK YOUR SERVILE POISON.

How ironic.

Exchange one handler for another.

If you want your old handler you can keep your old handler.......

But it doesn't have to be this way. If we push for adoption by more real merchants, we could actually spend our anonymous currency just as we can spend cash in person. This push for adoption will require teamwork though which is exactly what is lacking in this current environment.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: Sir Alpha_goy on September 05, 2016, 01:12:29 AM
More like "The battle of the scams"

Who can make the most monkeys fling their poo the furthest.

The only way to liquidate anon coins is to give all your credentials to an exchange.

DNA, ip, or ID.

PICK YOUR SERVILE POISON.

How ironic.

Exchange one handler for another.

If you want your old handler you can keep your old handler.......

But it doesn't have to be this way. If we push for adoption by more real merchants, we could actually spend our anonymous currency just as we can spend cash in person. This push for adoption will require teamwork though which is exactly what is lacking in this current environment.

Nope.

It does.

The double decker couch was a nice idea but I believe it was ditched in the end.

Time for the plan to progress.



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: electronicash on September 05, 2016, 01:16:55 AM

Its a good thing Dash moved away from darknet and that Dash privacy solution is totally optional.  



I lolled so hard at this, wtf, this is the best joke ever...

come on man, you can't be serious...

now Dash is better cuz the privacy is optional... newsflash, xmr's privacy is optional too, with the viewkey...

you know why those dnm's didn't choose Dash, cuz the privacy features are inherently flawed, not optional, but flawed...


I really wonder if you were able to keep a straight face when starting this topic... I lolled really hard, thank you!

best regards

it may just be good for them to take out of that anonymous feature, I remember there was a beach resort that accepts DASH lately and so they are starting to be noticed and planned to be used by the masses. maybe they figure mass adoption can be much possible if privacy is taken out.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 05, 2016, 12:12:14 PM
Not to beat a dead horse but this again why it is more important than ever for privacy centric cryptos to work together rather than bashing each other.

Here is the direct link to EFF article that was quoted:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/rule-41-little-known-committee-proposes-grant-new-hacking-powers-government


Again, the equation is pretty simple. We squabble, the world becomes like 1984. We unite, we at least have a chance of forcing their hand.

The majority of discussion has been using facts to base claims about Dash and Monero.

"Bashing" is the term used when the opposing side of the discussion does not like how the discussion is going so they play the victim card.




A lot of people appear to have missed the point in my original post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg16103807#msg16103807) asking both communities to be more cooperative. They can still compete and use that competition to innovate and they can still critique the other technology. What I believe needs to happen though for cryptos in general to succeed is to do this in a more professional and jovial manner.

You are correct that some of the discussions have used facts and have been productive but a lot of the conversations have also been without facts and very childish.

Here is just one of many examples that I do believe is "bashing" as it does not reference facts, evidence or data of any kind and instead uses verbiage like "scam" and "snakeoil".

https://imgur.com/a/IiwTb

Here is another example where "DashHole" is used.

https://imgur.com/a/fl4jX

It is a known problem that members of the Monero community actively make aggressive claims about other technology without providing evidence to back these claims up. In the last example, one of the Monero team is quoted in stating they cannot control members of their community. That is true and I believe stifling free speech always leads to bad outcomes so that is not something I am advocating for in anyway.

The one thing that can be done is for someone from the Monero team to make a statement that they do not support members of their community making claims without providing evidence. They could make that post in this thread and it won't have to be mentioned again. That way at least myself and others in the Monero community, including the aggressors, will know that the Monero team does not support this behavior and then hopefully we can move forward together in advocating for the adoption of cryptos.

By remaining silent, they are endorsing this behavior and it is off putting and unprofessional.

I have been investing and watching both Monero and Dash for over two years and am continuously embarrassed to be part of a community that acts so childish when so much is at stake. I have been vocal as of late as I am becoming increasingly worried at the direction our society is moving and believe that cooperation is more necessary now than it ever has been.


Speaking of stifling free speech, I was extremely disappointed that my plea to the Monero and Dash communities was censored on the Monero subreddit: http://imgur.com/a/Cqnz1

My plea is still on the bitcointalk Monero thread which is great but I'm not sure I understand why it was removed on the Monero subreddit.

It is a little hypocritical that the Monero team believes it cannot control certain members of its community but then actively censors other members of that same community that are only trying to bring a stop to the unproductive hostility.


I believe both communities should let the past be the past and open a new door towards cooperation but we cannot do that without the leaders setting an example for others to follow.



As the topic of why masternode owners are likely long term investors was brought up, I'm happy to chime in.

During the day I'm a derivatives trader. I really don't trust our markets so I never hold futures contracts for very long and whenever I do invest in something for the long term, I am always looking for the most yield with the least amount of risk.

Currently, I could park my money in treasuries, bonds, dividend paying stocks or even write my own options. What becomes fairly apparent when looking into all of these though is that the yield on both the safer and riskier investments is so low right now that at this point in time, they don't make a lot of sense unless those are your only options.

While Dash is not the only crypto I hold, it is currently the only one that does offer an inviting yield on your investment. On my masternodes I currently make 10% annual ROI. About 1.75% of that does get taken away whenever I convert masternode payments back to fiat due to various exchange fees but the remaining 8.25% is still a fantastic return.

While I know this is anecdotal evidence, I do think its safe to assume that a good portion of other masternode owners have performed a similar assessment of what will offer the greatest "guaranteed" ROI and chose to invest in Dash and its masternodes because of this. All investments have risks and your initial investment could go down in value. Dash is no exception but considering that I actually have voting power as to the direction of my investment, I feel comfortable holding Dash for the long term over lets say Intel or Apple stock where I could be earning a much smaller dividend with lower risk but would not have the same voting power.

Without incentivized nodes, I am beginning to doubt the long term viability of other currencies as I think they will eventually face the same problems that bitcoin is now. I really hope more currencies begin to incorporate incentivized nodes and I know there are several that are.


 ::) i know you have investments in dash masternodes..and threats to dash is also a threat to your investment...i understand that.

BUT..you cannot strip humans of their emotions.. i recommend putting on your "dash t-shirt" and drink your coffee from "dash mug" and let's have some fun  ;)


I have made it clear from the beginning that most of my cash worth is spread between Monero and Dash. More recently, I've been making a whole lot more money in Monero than I have Dash but making money has never been the point. The ROI that Dash masternodes offer is just a bonus, as is the money I have been making in Monero, both of which I still plan to hold long term. I do not want a "dash t-shirt" or a "dash mug". I just want everyone to expand their scope of thinking and see everyone in the crypto space as being part of the same group and begin to treat each other with respect. While it is impossible to strip humans of their emotions and would be counter-productive to do so, I think we can hold everyone to a higher standard.

I believe in both currencies and the point that everyone continues to miss, including you, is that this is much larger than "my" investments.

This is about changing the way our species makes transactions and about giving everyone freedom which I really do not think we have been able to experience in our entire history. Decentralization was not technically feasible until just recently and now we have a chance to change the underlying systems of our civilization. But in order to do this, we have to overcome a lot of barriers and will have to engage with a lot of organizations that have billions of dollars at stake if the status quo was to change. They are not going to give up easily and quite frankly have not even started to fight us. The combined marketcap of the top 100 cryptos is only 12 billion. Do you know what that is to Goldman Sachs? 3 months worth of earnings. Do you know what that is to Apple? 1 / 50th of their market cap. They have not started to fight us because we are barely a threat.

We will be though and that is when the real battle will begin and I believe that is right around the corner. We need to get our ducks in a row and stop our in fighting so we can get organized for what lies ahead. Constructive criticism is great. Name calling, unsubstantiated claims and posts without links to evidence or that are phrased in an aggressive or childish way only serve to widen our divisions when we need to be doing the exact opposite.

Would any of this behavior be tolerated in the business world? Would any of this be tolerated at any reputable firm? The answer is clearly no and these are the very entrenched systems that we are up against. They will walk all over us as we try to push adoption if we do not change the way we present ourselves.

There is nothing "fun" about the direction our world is heading nor is there anything "fun" about the way that millions of people suffer under the existing monopolies of banks and remittance companies. I believe that each persons life is inherently meaningless and that it is up to the individual to give meaning to their own life through their actions. We, as supporters of cryptos have an opportunity to make a real change and I urge everyone to think of the big picture and act accordingly.


i have a different vision, i prefer fighting/competition..it makes each other stronger and innovative..

i even like attacks, i wanted monero attacked, DASH attacked, Bitcoin attacked... attack everywhere.. we don't want to release a crypto currency to the whole world that will fail and bring billions of $ down with it..

think of crypto like a bitcoin dojo with satoshi nakamoto as sensei

monero and dash are sparring partners, include zcash too..after they toughen up they will leave the bitcoin dojo and find their path in the world.

regarding shills, they are my favorites..i neutralize their lies and deception...i also have fun along the way  ;D

regarding speculators, they are part of the ecosystem...people gamble, trade, invest, make a few bucks etc.. that's life.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: bbc.reporter on September 06, 2016, 12:31:35 AM

...

i have a different vision, i prefer fighting/competition..it makes each other stronger and innovative..

i even like attacks, i wanted monero attacked, DASH attacked, Bitcoin attacked... attack everywhere.. we don't want to release a crypto currency to the whole world that will fail and bring billions of $ down with it..

think of crypto like a bitcoin dojo with satoshi nakamoto as sensei

monero and dash are sparring partners, include zcash too..after they toughen up they will leave the bitcoin dojo and find their path in the world.

regarding shills, they are my favorites..i neutralize their lies and deception...i also have fun along the way  ;D

regarding speculators, they are part of the ecosystem...people gamble, trade, invest, make a few bucks etc.. that's life.

I like how you think my friend. This is a good and healthy way to think of the whole cryptosphere. Some coins and platforms will directly compete with each other and there is not way we can avoid that. What we can avoid doing is the bashing and the trolling and spreading of the FUD. Why not instead make constructive criticism?

You can also add vcash chain blender technique in the battle of anonymous transactions. They too might have something very useful for the cryptosphere.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dwgscale11 on September 06, 2016, 12:55:15 AM
Litecoin will own them all when the time is right.. SOON


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 06, 2016, 01:21:38 AM

...

i have a different vision, i prefer fighting/competition..it makes each other stronger and innovative..

i even like attacks, i wanted monero attacked, DASH attacked, Bitcoin attacked... attack everywhere.. we don't want to release a crypto currency to the whole world that will fail and bring billions of $ down with it..

think of crypto like a bitcoin dojo with satoshi nakamoto as sensei

monero and dash are sparring partners, include zcash too..after they toughen up they will leave the bitcoin dojo and find their path in the world.

regarding shills, they are my favorites..i neutralize their lies and deception...i also have fun along the way  ;D

regarding speculators, they are part of the ecosystem...people gamble, trade, invest, make a few bucks etc.. that's life.

I like how you think my friend. This is a good and healthy way to think of the whole cryptosphere. Some coins and platforms will directly compete with each other and there is not way we can avoid that. What we can avoid doing is the bashing and the trolling and spreading of the FUD. Why not instead make constructive criticism?

You can also add vcash chain blender technique in the battle of anonymous transactions. They too might have something very useful for the cryptosphere.

Quote
Why not instead make constructive criticism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_criticism

Quote
Constructive criticism is the process of offering valid and well-reasoned opinions about the work of others, usually involving both positive and negative comments, in a friendly manner rather than an oppositional one. The purpose of 'constructive criticism is to improve the outcome. In collaborative work, this kind of criticism is a valuable tool in raising and maintaining performance standards.

do you think these shills would be friendly when they are heavily invested, brainwashed and delusional?

like i was stating up thread, you cannot remove human emotions...these battle will be full of emotions i guarantee you ;D


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: electronicash on September 06, 2016, 01:51:04 AM
Why is NAV and SDC out of the picture?
I've read here in the forum where they said that SDC and NAV has better technology than those mentioned in the OP.  If you can check it on bittrex these two coins are also being traded well.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 06, 2016, 02:10:09 AM
Why is NAV and SDC out of the picture?
I've read here in the forum where they said that SDC and NAV has better technology than those mentioned in the OP.  If you can check it on bittrex these two coins are also being traded well.

because dash shills like qwizzie would like to think dash is still at about the same level as monero but in reality they now at the same level with SDC and NAV..

that's right qwizzie go FUD SDC and NAV ... who knows they might take a huge chunk off DASH marketcap  ;)


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: electronicash on September 06, 2016, 02:21:18 AM
Why is NAV and SDC out of the picture?
I've read here in the forum where they said that SDC and NAV has better technology than those mentioned in the OP.  If you can check it on bittrex these two coins are also being traded well.

because dash shills like qwizzie would like to think dash is still at about the same level as monero but in reality they now at the same level with SDC and NAV..

that's right qwizzie go FUD SDC and NAV ... who knows they might take a huge chunk off DASH marketcap  ;)

Their ANN thread seem to be telling the opposite. The rest of them don't know the sudden rise but then i guess the rest of the users who hope to earn when it goes up prefer to invest on SDC and NAV as its cheaper. My bet why its going up though is these coins are being used if there are some hacks going on and just maybe a huge site is currently penetrated like btcjam.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: c789 on September 06, 2016, 02:59:59 AM
:) It's almost as if this thread was made for this page: https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php

Of course, I'm partial to Monero, but that's only because I did a lot of research. My goal was not finding the best opportunity for a pump-and-dump. My goal was to find the most untraceable, most private coin, period. I knew if I found that coin, then eventually the masses would realize it too...and they're starting to. After all, we're dealing with math (specifically cryptography), and math does not care about pump-and-dumps or marketing.

I used to be fan of some of the other coins until I did heavy research. You can dig through my past posts to verify this. The page above is a summary of my research, but do your own research. Don't just go by what others say and who has the coolest looking site, logo, girls dancing, etc.

There are good reasons why entities which depend on privacy and untraceability are using Monero and not the others.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dinofelis on September 06, 2016, 03:02:32 AM
Why is NAV and SDC out of the picture?
I've read here in the forum where they said that SDC and NAV has better technology than those mentioned in the OP.  If you can check it on bittrex these two coins are also being traded well.

I didn't know NAV - well, I might have seen it "amongst the krill of altcoins" but I didn't realize it had some serious anonymity tech.  I started looking into it.  There's at least one thing I don't like about it from the start, and that is that anonymity is an option (that is, you can do transactions "in the clear").   In fact, it is the thing I didn't get around for ZCASH either, I don't know if ZCASH, finally, will be "default anonymous", or whether anonymity is an option there.  With zerocoin, it is an option, because you have to decide yourself to "commit" the underlying coin (originally bitcoin), which is why I thought that the same happened to ZCASH.  But after reading the ZCASH paper, it is not clear to me now.

I've repeated this often: anonymity shouldn't be an option.  It should be inherent in the system, and there may be an option to DISCLOSE your transactions.  Like cash is essentially anonymous by construction.   You MAY go through the hassle of writing down all the serial numbers of the bills that go through your hands and publish this, so that people later can recognize that the bill they got, 50 transactions later, were once yours.    But the system shouldn't offer a way to "be automatically in the clear" because one NEEDS A LOT OF INNOCENT ANONYMOUS TRANSACTIONS in order for anonymity as obfuscation technique to work.  If only those needing it, are going to use it, they stand out, which defeats the purpose.



Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dinofelis on September 06, 2016, 03:22:05 AM
:) It's almost as if this thread was made for this page: https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php

Of course, I'm partial to Monero, but that's only because I did a lot of research. My goal was not finding the best opportunity for a pump-and-dump. My goal was to find the most untraceable, most private coin, period. I knew if I found that coin, then eventually the masses would realize it too...and they're starting to. After all, we're dealing with math (specifically cryptography), and math does not care about pump-and-dumps or marketing.

I used to be fan of some of the other coins until I did heavy research. You can dig through my past posts to verify this. The page above is a summary of my research, but do your own research. Don't just go by what others say and who has the coolest looking site, logo, girls dancing, etc.

There are good reasons why entities which depend on privacy and untraceability are using Monero and not the others.

Same here.   I might come over as a kind of monero shill, but I followed the same way as you did: for the moment, I think it is one of the better anon tech (and a coin that seems to be reasonably fair) ; I like monero because of the tech, and not the other way around.   I used to like DASH, and I still like DASH as a pioneer and one of the first movers in the anon space, but I think that monero is simply better anon tech.

I'm in doubt about zcash.  It just *might* be super great tech.  What is sure, is that there are several things that I don't like about the particularities of this future coin: its "for profit company" stuff, the "first 4 years of taxes", and the way the trusted setup is set up.  But it may just be brilliant technology on which a better anon coin can be built.   You could compare it to the situation with the brilliant technology of cryptonote, but first put to work in a scammy coin.  It is not because the first coin putting the tech to work has problems *as a coin* that the technology is bad.

If ZCASH turns out to be "default anonymous" I think there are ways to make a better "trusted setup" (for instance, with thousands or more initial participants) ; so who knows that from zcash, one can make a clone that is fair and better than monero (or maybe monero can incorporate part of its tech).

In the end, what I'm interested in, is the best anon tech.

It is true that things like NAV are integrating an aspect of anonymity which wasn't considered in monero: the *network* anonymity.  Monero was still solving the problem of *blockchain data anonymity*.

Now, I think that this is the most important aspect, and one could discuss whether the network anonymity is the job of the coin or not.  The problem with a lack of block chain anonymity a la bitcoin, is that your transactions are graved in stone *forever*.   So 30 years after you did so, one can still go and dig it up, and there is no deniability.   The networking anonymity is more furtive.   Ok, if your IP is registered in the clear by a node to which you send it, one can trace you.  But this knowledge becomes less and less usable after many years.  One can wonder whether the networking anon protocol is the job of the coin - after all, this is not part of the "block chain tech" which only describes the block chain data structure, the rules of interpretation and verification and the rules for appending.  But as a software system, it can be nice to integrate also an anon network.  Or one could use an existing one, such as I2P or TOR.

Finally, there's something else.    There's a rule in crypto, which is: "don't use crypto you've invented in your basement for serious stuff".  You can invent crypto in your basement, but then it should be peer or hacker reviewed for years, before you can start to assume that it is somehow safe.  That's a pain, because it means that you cannot do quick innovation in crypto.   Crypto is technology, but also belief.   If the tech doesn't work, then the belief is dangerous.  But even if the tech works, it takes time to develop the belief.   So one should find a middle ground between doing new stuff, and being conservative with crypto technology.  You cannot invent new crypto on Monday, and use it on a large and important scale on Friday.  Crypto has to mature, and win justified belief in its correct functioning, failed attack after failed attack.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: alanshore on September 06, 2016, 05:56:01 PM
FBI director says agency preparing attack on data encryption after the elections (http://thedashtimes.com/2016/09/06/fbi-announces-post-election-attack-encryption/)


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: bbc.reporter on September 07, 2016, 04:14:29 AM
FBI director says agency preparing attack on data encryption after the elections (http://thedashtimes.com/2016/09/06/fbi-announces-post-election-attack-encryption/)

This will be fun. Let us see what the EFF and the old men of crypto react to this and how they will counter this. Will this make crypto improve and become stronger?


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: Gahs on September 07, 2016, 06:02:47 AM
can't they all coexist?


Well, they are coexisting already. They are just fighting for a larger market share... and Monero, Dash and Zcash need to make major improvements in different areas if they want to be the last altcoin standing.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: @prashant on September 07, 2016, 11:12:06 AM
Dash has become really popular as compared to those two.but it also comes with anonymity privacy.its better to invest in dash rather than monero as it market is rising and price has greatly rised up.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: bbc.reporter on September 08, 2016, 04:57:25 AM
Dash has become really popular as compared to those two.but it also comes with anonymity privacy.its better to invest in dash rather than monero as it market is rising and price has greatly rised up.

I disagree. Dash's master nodes are not a good way to make your coins anonymous because "a government, group of hackers, other entity, or even an individual bought many masternodes (there would be no way to know if this occured), and if the transaction passed through a route where all of the masternodes were owned by that entity, then the transaction could be traced by that entity."

If you want to read more about the comparisons of anonymous coins read it here https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php

That should be enough information for you to know the difference and the superiority of Monero.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: NeuroticFish on September 08, 2016, 01:25:04 PM
Dash has become really popular as compared to those two.but it also comes with anonymity privacy.its better to invest in dash rather than monero as it market is rising and price has greatly rised up.

I feel like Dash is here and popular since .. like forever. Years.
First I felt like I missed the train. Then I didn't like the re-branding. I liked the Darkcoin name and I knew of another coin, DashCoin, so it was not a fair move.
Then I felt like others' claims (that Dash may not be as correct and anonymous as it first looks) may be true.
Now I feel like people start leaving Dash and the coin is losing popularity.

Monero should have faster development, but slow is still better than none, so I don't complain.

Zcash tries to find its way onto this world. When it will be out of beta, when it will be on the markets and when devs from other areas will review the code and give fair opinion about it.. then we will know what's Zcash about. Until then I find the Zcash discussions only attempts to create buzz around this project.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: .m. on September 08, 2016, 01:55:13 PM
Dash has become really popular as compared to those two.but it also comes with anonymity privacy.its better to invest in dash rather than monero as it market is rising and price has greatly rised up.

I disagree. Dash's master nodes are not a good way to make your coins anonymous because "a government, group of hackers, other entity, or even an individual bought many masternodes (there would be no way to know if this occured), and if the transaction passed through a route where all of the masternodes were owned by that entity, then the transaction could be traced by that entity."

If you want to read more about the comparisons of anonymous coins read it here https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php

That should be enough information for you to know the difference and the superiority of Monero.

I do not own XMR neither DASH. I heard that this kind of attack is nearly impossible, or the probability of tracing is very low.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 08, 2016, 03:19:44 PM
Dash has become really popular as compared to those two.but it also comes with anonymity privacy.its better to invest in dash rather than monero as it market is rising and price has greatly rised up.

I disagree. Dash's master nodes are not a good way to make your coins anonymous because "a government, group of hackers, other entity, or even an individual bought many masternodes (there would be no way to know if this occured), and if the transaction passed through a route where all of the masternodes were owned by that entity, then the transaction could be traced by that entity."

If you want to read more about the comparisons of anonymous coins read it here https://moneroforcash.com/monero-vs-dash-vs-zcash-vs-bitcoinmixers.php

That should be enough information for you to know the difference and the superiority of Monero.

I do not own XMR neither DASH. I heard that this kind of attack is nearly impossible, or the probability of tracing is very low.


there is a difference between a completely private and partly private blockchain..

Ariel, I'm going to be polite.

You do not consider that the Monero block chain is unverifiable because it is completely opaque. If you want to "trust the math" and believe no loop hole will ever exist allowing coins to be inserted, changing the supply of coins, or that "the math" will never have an unforeseen hole where transactions will be detangled, something that can't happen with private send, that is fine.

However, an open blockchain, with inputs and outputs that can be seen with the naked eye, and verified is one of the cornerstones of Bitcoin's brilliance.  And Dash kept that while also providing privacy.

Because of that, I personally think Dash's privacy feature is far superior to Monero's.  Dash is solid.  You know where everything stands at any time.


And yet, once again, Dash's superior privacy, fungibility and verifiable blockchain is only one of the many features Dash provides in creating a world class currency that will be used by a majority of the human population in only half a generation's time.  But good luck with Monero, but if you want to use your funds for illegal purposes, please use a minimum 8 rounds of mixing in Dash, and leave the Monero at home.  I really don't trust it, and fear for your safety.

You think you know it all, you think you can trust "the math" but these cryptographic proofs have weaknesses that can be exploited.  Some have been discovered, as in secp256r1, and there could be other weaknesses that have yet to be revealed.



Quote
If you want to "trust the math"

yes, we want to trust the math. that is what cryptography is for..is what crypto currency is for.

back to privacy..
i can compare dash blockchain now to the internet, at first you thought that the internet is private but then it is not...then tor was created, it made the internet "PARTLY PRIVATE" ... didn't we heard of government being able to successfully trace in tor? yes it did happen and it is in the news.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: NeuroticFish on September 08, 2016, 03:26:53 PM
Quote
If you want to "trust the math"
yes, we want to trust the math. that is what cryptography is for..is what crypto currency is for.

back to privacy..
.........

If you trust the math, why don't you let the math do the privacy too?
What should be better, the privacy done for you by some people you don't know they're honest with you or not, or the privacy done by the network with mathematically proven methods?
Unless there are bugs (and no big issues were found afaik) I tend to like the second...


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: arielbit on September 08, 2016, 11:46:47 PM
Quote
If you want to "trust the math"
yes, we want to trust the math. that is what cryptography is for..is what crypto currency is for.

back to privacy..
.........

If you trust the math, why don't you let the math do the privacy too?
What should be better, the privacy done for you by some people you don't know they're honest with you or not, or the privacy done by the network with mathematically proven methods?
Unless there are bugs (and no big issues were found afaik) I tend to like the second...

that's another way/words to put it  :D


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: aamarket on September 14, 2016, 01:37:11 PM
So it seems Monero is the best out of three, right ?
 


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: amacar2 on September 14, 2016, 01:44:50 PM
Monero seem to provide better privacy out of listed three. And after darkweb started accepting XMR, i think we can say monero will come well above than other alts in future. However on future may be another coin will beat monero and provide better privacy, but i think privacy really doesn't matter for normal crypto users.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: dinofelis on September 14, 2016, 02:37:07 PM
So it seems Monero is the best out of three, right ?
 

For the moment, I think so too.  However, ZCASH has very interesting crypto.  The main problems I have with ZCASH are:

1) the post-premine by the company
2) the trusted setup
3) (not sure but I think) that ZCASH doesn't use compulsory private transactions, like monero does.

That said, ZCASH DOES have very good ideas.  I think that the main fundamental problem, the trusted setup, can be vastly improved.  When that will be the case, when it will be a grass-roots chain (no postpremine) and when the private transactions are the only possible, ZCASH has better anonymity properties than monero.  But without these 3 aspects, I think I prefer monero's anonymity, although it is not total.

DASH has, IMO, "historical" merit, in that it is one of the first cryptos trying to implement what could improve anonymity.  I think that DASH's anonymity tech (mixers) is outdated, and requires a lot of extra structure (master mixer nodes...) that has been made obsolete by the technology of ring signatures (Monero) and also by the technology of zero knowledge proofs (zcash). 


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: xdrzrex on October 08, 2016, 03:19:23 PM
Nobody mentioned Shadowcoin, their privacy support is supposed to be good as well.


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: DarkLurker on October 09, 2016, 01:13:03 PM
Nobody mentioned Shadowcoin, their privacy support is supposed to be good as well.

Shadowcash privacy looks to be on par with Monero as they both use ring sigs, but Shadow look like they have an advantage on the bitcoin codebase as thats where most of the development is taking place.

http://i65.tinypic.com/oity0n.png


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: CoinCidental on October 09, 2016, 03:11:59 PM
after a lot of research ,MONERO is going to come out on top imo
get them while thyre still affordable
also,why not include NAV and SDC ?


Title: Re: The battle over online privacy (Dash / Monero / Zcash)
Post by: CoinCidental on October 09, 2016, 03:13:42 PM
So it seems Monero is the best out of three, right ?
 

right !
thats my conclusion anyway ,and then SDC and then NAV ........in that order