Bitcoin Forum

Out of all the shitcoins made, the one's he makes are the more useless ones. He comes up with inappropriate coins(VaginaCoin/WeedCoin), that are pointless. I think it ruins this section even more as it is.

I for one think he should be banned.

I hate to say it but yes - Hazard's nick may as well be "ShitCoin"

Very much indeed.

vote and confirm it's me vote ban  :) :)

If he keeps it up, yes. He's proven his point, and the constant crapcoin releases are getting tiring - no reason to continue contributing to the clutter.

yez get him baanneed, and look at the poll

Indeed. I like the coins made by other authors besides him.

He's probably the one who voted no.

I agree to vote ban Hazard

You can ban Hazard but am pretty sure he already has several alts. What needs to change is the communities attitude on new and worthless crap coins, if nobody mines them there will be no point to create them.

We will see many many more and here's why. If you haven't heard it for a while it's well worth it.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qga5eONXU_4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qga5eONXU_4)

yes, pls, ASAP!

stop letting people sick with shjtcoin  >:(

lol

Banning him is a little harsh.

I personally thank him for showing how easy it is to change a few parameters in Bitcoin/Litecoin code and make your own currency.

No clone coins/scam coins will be taken seriously from now on, except only by the true idiots.

Only the innovative coins will survive, that will push people to innovate, which brings great things to all of us.  :)

Thanks Hazard!

What I don't get is the mod leave his posts with questionable content untouched while removing several of my rather witty replies. Banning the guy will achieve nothing, heck he might be the mod.

He will continue to make threads of new coins regardless if they survive or not.

He's no mod.

Well.. let the idiots that buy this crap be fleeced of their money IMO.

It leaves more of the coins that actually will survive for the rest of us.  :)

Indeed, but I can't enjoy the forum when the thread I see is "VaginaCoin" and "WeedCoin".

I stopped enjoying this subforum a month+ ago.

I'm not sure why I even come here anymore. :)

Well I knew this place was headed for the gutter when porn and sex coins were released. Hazard seems to thrive in this environment.

What pisses me off even more is that no solutions have been implemented to stop the spam. There's even a fucking announcement and nothing has been done.

This is just a witch hunt and just as retarded as all the alt coins.

Don't shoot the messenger. Seems like a well-thought-out plan to make money while proving how worthless every "lol changed 50 to 1 billion!" coin is. He put the community on a fast track to realize the truth behind the new alt releases, and now actual progress can resume.

Off with his head!

I'd say shakezula had just as much to do with it :P

No need to ban hazard. The Powers that be are currently building a new forum, with a subforum for every altcoin. you signup, and register your coin and bam! you get your own subforum.

No, just someone that wants to clean the place up, but it seems like a pointless endeavor.
I'm sure you don't mind the smut and such and fit right in but there a few of us with some class here.

Him and his other 13 accounts.    ;D


-tb-

A ban doesn't make any sense.. He has done nothing wrong according to the forum rules.. Just people with an IQ of 80 or less mine the daily shitcoins and he exploit how stupid a majority of the people are in this forum so all the power to him.

I did vote no. Anyone can simply ignore his posts if they choose to.

I share the belief that Hazard might serves a purpose by helping the community to get better at discerning good coins from the bad ones...

Beside, personally, I found WeedCoin entertaining.

Sorry, but I vote NO.

- There is nothing to stop him from creating another username.
- Even if he didn't (use an alt) and got banned, that doesn't stop others from making crapcoins.
- The more coins that come out, the faster they are dying, so it won't go on forever.
- If people are willing to pay him to make coins and he is profiting from it, then good for him.
- If he breaks the forum rules then ban him...but don't call for a ban just because you don't like what he does.  You sound like one of those people who goes crying to the government to "make a law" banning whatever behavior you don't agree with.

Having said that...

- Do I like all the crapcoin releases?  No.
- Do I think he has made questionable posts?  Absolutely.
- Is what he is doing good for crypto?  Not at all...which of course is the point.  But imho I think the flood of crapcoins is hurting ALL crypto coins (including king BTC)...not just the new altcoins.  It may not yet show in price of the older coins, but I think it definitely hurts the "image" of crypto coins being a medium that can be taken seriously.  Obviously this is not Hazard's fault, so don't think I'm putting blame on him.  His actions are actually a reaction to the flood of crapcoins...NOT the cause.

As much as I personally smiled and mined (yes I admit it, I totally did) Vaginacoin, I agree. We need to start weeding out the really detrimental elements of the forum. And unfortunately Hazard is probably one of the 'altcoin culprints'. I'm sorry buddy, your time has come.

Yea, it is a pointless endeavor. It has something about freedom of speech. Hazard has every right to it. You have every right to to disagree.
"ban" Hazzard for his personal expression and freedom of speech.. Yep, 1935 Germany, its here again folks.

There are limits and I don't expect you to understand. Weedcoin, vaginacoin, sexcoin, and shitcoin - this is the face of altcoins? Is this place a joke? It's certainly starting to look that way.

I voted no also. He is not breaking rules.  All this is open source.
Its just easy to ignore shit. A lot of you guys are very big babies and cant seems to look past shit. For that I am sorry, life must drive you crazy.

Silencing him or cutting people out from making alts your pretty much going agenst everything bitcoin is about. YOU want to control the markets.

Dont mine shit if you dont like it. Really its not that hard.LTC has its own forums. BTC has its own section. No one makes you come to this part of the forum. No one forces you to buy any of the alts, no of forces you to mine ...

Hazard owns a AltCoin creating service.
I see nothing wrong with he's doing, he's just giving his clients their coins, and their telling him to release them.

Please blame it on his clients instead. He's just following his agreements within his business. Also, I see nothing wrong with what he's doing. There's five Alt-Coins made per day, and most of them are 'shitcoins', yet nobody ever get's banned for that, do they?

Also, I think this is just his funny way of replying to the five Alt-Coins produced per day. Making 'shit' to compete with 'shit'. Basically giving what every 'shitcoin' miner wants. (As everybody with common sense has said.)

Lol.

No.

-1

+1

The results say predominately the people votes

I trust polls here as much as I trust the DOJ here in the USA now... all it takes is a few alt accounts...

Oh, I understand it, its called satire. Put your big boy pants on and ignore it. Just that simple. I am in no means endorsing these coins, but I can see them for what they are. "shitcoin" should have been a clue. "Sexcoin" a nice way of saying F*ckcoin. Vaginacoin? made for pusses? dunno. but Hazzard is making a point. A very blunt point.

Or much like the voters in the US, uninformed or stupid.

I voted no.

Out of all the new coins created. I kind of like HyperCoin and WeedCoin.

I also own RoyalCoins, PowerCoins, GoldCoins, JunkCoins, DigitalCoins, WorldCoins, Nibbles, ByteCoins and perhaps a few more.

I've also created websites (Faucets) for BitCoin, ByteCoin, DigitalCoin and WeedCoin.

Yes yes... One day we should talk politics :)


yeah I think most of us have a few alts that we mine regularly.
I cant mine LTC or BTC. So in order for me to stick around I need a few others that I can mine and maybe get a few bucks. Plus I have made a few buddies here in the month I have been here so far....
In a way we need to alts to get the noobs in. Keeps the big guns from raping the coins too bad for too long and give em a chance to actually mine.

This forum is not bitcoin, there needs to be some moderation to keep things civilized. In my opinion the mods here let too much stuff fly, the other sections on the forum are better managed. It's become almost impossible to have a serious discussion in this forum anymore because there's always so much shit pushing down valid threads.

Hazard is contributing to the problem, even though he may only be a symptom of it, therefore I wouldn't mind him banned. Of course it wouldn't accomplish much - a lot more needs to be done to clean things up here.

And there's the funny part, I am responsible for most of the releases on this forum. :D Probably at least one of the coins you like.

Additionally, WeedCoin/VaginaCoin are no more inherently worthless than every other release on this forum. Including the beloved LiteCoin which was just a Tenebrix ripoff that was marketed well. Try and argue otherwise.

So because he is doing something you dont agree with you just ban him?

This might be crude when I say this, but like the way I was treated when I first joined here and asked or wanted to know something:
Use the search function to find what you need to know.

Yeah aint it swell when that gets tossed back at ya?

lol at that +1.

As much as I totally dislike everything about these i had to vote no.

personally the few more extreme aspects might have been found to go over the line, but i believe in the market, if we look back i can prove that the market could have fixed this but.....

.
.
.
Bitcointalk.org Would not let the Mod organize the sub forum.
.
.
so it was regulation that stifled the innovative human market solution to this problem, otherwise they would all be sitting in a little release child board and off the front.

But I’d like to thank the OP for the opportunity to have the discussion and completely empathize with him , but banning is always the last answer.

you could have a vote system on the threads, so that they disappear from view very quickly. why isn't his ignore button orange if so many people feel so much about it?

please don't associate nibble with Hazard......pleeease.

also junk, WDC, and Gold and royal , ad lucky to that (it was my name idea) < were all the same guys pretty sure.

It's not even about banning Hazard. The bitcoin elite would love to send anyone interested in alts to this forum. It's turned into an elementary playground with no moderation at all(except my witty replies). Maybe that's the grand plan.

 here is the thing - I’d say the mod felt as if he was not allowed to do his job , he specifically asked to be able to direct and organize this , he was told no , I can't speak for his thoughts and feelings but its not the mods fault , you need to go back further to the source.

It's not as straightforward as that, Hazard is deliberately causing chaos on these forums, that is what I don't agree with. I couldn't care less about all the alt coin releases. If this is a joke - he's taken it a little too far.

If everyone on here acted like Hazard there would be no point to this forum at all.

obvioulsy it was, but the market has a way of biting you , i tried to tell them that.  and look what happened. of course they will deny it.

Oh, and Simran, I find it highly amusing that you're shittalking weedcoin when this is found on your twitter:


420 blaze it, gotta tell the world you smoke weed! Such an edgy child. :D

That's what I am getting at. Turn this forum into smut and vulgarity and no clear thinking investor would spend 5 minutes here. That's my conspiracy theory....

I am beginning to think 16 year olds are elder members here.

i agree with everything that relm9 says , and i wanted to hit that yes, but i can't because its not Hazards fault in the same way that a surfer gets eaten by a shark.

every time someone in Australia gets eaten by a shark, the family always usually says " don't hunt it down , its just doing what a shark does"

this board could have been shark netted. with 100% accuracy , Mod asked , he was told no.

The forum is a not free market, there are rules and this must be regulated. Get it right, please.

I treat this subforum as a 'Benny Hill Revue' of crypto, but on second thought maybe we should just leave it behind.

Yes it is about banning Hazzard.

Thread title:
[ANN] Get Hazard Banned! [POLL]

You want to ban someone because hes doing something you all dont like.

Funny story

Like I said when I joined, not only did I get laughed at from the BTC community, LTC was a bunch of assholes too and made it very unwelcoming.

Wanna know who took me in? One of the so called shit coins in BBQ... there were a few people that helped me out and got me going mining. Helped me grasp the basic shit and then some.

Are the amounts of alts a little over the top? Sure... but I can just move on out.

Plus, many coins give newbs a taste of how it works. Makes em understand how blocks work, how difficulty adjusts, how payments work...ect ect. Many are cut and paste, but each has its own little set up.

without the alts, its no growth or interest. Only ones left mining are people that have major money invested.

ha ha oh dam, just dam the inernet. ha ha.

call hacked , i would.




**

nothing wrong with a smoke btw. : D

Okay smarty, point out what rules he broke?

I'm beginning to think Simran needs to just stick to trollbox... Kinda getting this vibe...

                         https://i.imgur.com/7z1hkaF.png

I like weed, but the section doesn't look appropriate for investors with WeedCoin, VaginaCoin, SexCoin, PornCoin.

I stopped going to shit place too. Just as bad as this shithole.

I may be a 'Hero Member' even though I have only actively been here for a few months and I have to agree. The rules, and regulations were written for 'a different time' and the fact that someone does not technically violate the rules does not mean that they uphold the spirit of the forum.

I can honestly say that bct has been on a very fast and steady decline for quite a while, mostly due to it's spirit being lost. This used to be a place for ideas, genuine development, trade and the general 'better' of crypto currency. Lately it seems it has turned into a 4chan of altcoin bickering. I am sadly one of the people that from time to time has gotten sucked into this and for that I am sorry.

Though I have never broken a forum rule, have a flawless trading, loan and purchase reputation I feel I should consider my posts more carefully and stop engaging in the kind of juvenile chatter that has become commonplace here lately. Please do consider my ban vote not a personal insult to Hazard, but rather a voice for a reboot of a forum that should focus on more important things.

Edit; Vaginacoin was fucking hilarious!

dude , i can only jjust type this , i'm laughing so hard you have a coin with what  looks like a surprised turd on it ha ha ha ha ha!!

ha ha omg its just the best thing in life. ! oh man.. i loved this forum more than the troll box {wipes tears away} ha ha.

i just love it so much, please don't ban any of this ....


https://bitcointalk.org/useravatars/avatar_90389.png
.
being all serious and shit you are.. ha ha

What about these altcoins makes them worthy of investment? Please, enlighten me. I can crank out several per day.

To start with, how appropriate their title is.

I'm asking about inherent value. Vaginacoin is about as inherently valuable as every other release on this forum.

Yep, Beavis and Butthead would approve.

YOu know why? Because money is involved.Once money factors in... its a whole new ball game. BTC will only be for the people with deep pockets. LTC is already there too but not to the extent yet as BTC.

what have i been doing all my life?

So let's assume for the moment that I live in a country such as Portugal. It is in the not-so-distant future and there is exchange happening for particular niched cryptocoins. Since they accept it and I have acquired some, I have decided to use WeedCoin for weed and BBQCoin for BBQ. Very appropriate titles to exchange for the services/goods they render, do you disagree? Both are non-penalized goods in my jurisdiction. I can still use traditional currency or other cryptos such as Bitcoin or Litecoin. What the hell is the problem? You don't like the name based solely on your mindset and those around you?


This is a world forum!

https://i.imgur.com/CRsV8aW.png
                                                                            ^{Bye now!}

OK, seeing -[ANN] VaginaCoin - The coin you want to fuck!- when you first visit the forum. Certainly confirms alts legitimacy in my book.

That's exactly the point. None of this shit here is legitimate. None of this shit has any inherent value.

Which is EXACTLY what I was saying.

You realise statements like that can just as easily apply to BTC?

Be careful  :P

ha ha i see this as the engine room , i like that anything fly’s here , it just needed organization.

investors while they can come here ….

don't generally go to the slaughterhouse on the way the their favorite steak house either.

I remain skeptical on that front too. What gives Bitcoin value if the system is so easily duplicated, as I've demonstrated here?

Right now, first-mover advantage is the only thing that can be said for sure.

lol you're like the guy from the movie Thank You For Smoking.

You have to realize crpyto is a disruptive technology.

Still, you are obviously good at what you do - coding.

I respect that.

EDIT: New theory Hazard is FBI  :P

Jackjack deserves it more IMHO.

At least I provide working binaries  ::)

I see so you frequent the forum to prove your point. Smartest guy in the room kind of thing.

No, I'm just amused at how many newbies lose their shirt investing in these altcoins, and seek to inject some sanity into the conversation.

Feathercoin was the biggest crypto related sham of 2013.

Disclaimer: I have made plenty of money dumping altcoins at their high point.

Got it, a sadist.

Not exactly.

But if you're into that, baby, I'll pretend.

If there was some organization, it'd definitely help. I hate seeing a bunch of giveaway and trading threads for mostly junk coins on page 1 all the time. These have no place among actual discussion threads. It's recently gotten to the point where I don't even bother to browse around here anymore. Don't have the time to sift through it all.

But as you said it's apparently out of the mods' hands which is unfortunate. The community (or at least anyone that's interested in having constructive conversations) is eventually going to wither away, it'll just be a breeding ground for trolls and those hoping to leech BTC from suckers.

Hazard is either:

a.) Just making BTC and having fun
b.) Has an agenda to bring down all the alts and strengthen BTC
c.) Is involved in something far more sinister (think how the banks or government would try and destroy alt currencies so they only had to focus on BTC) . BTC probably gives them nightmares enough as it is imagine what they think of alts!

Now where did I put my tin foil hat.

But thanks to feathercoin:

 http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqyjnbWTDL1qkhbd6o1_500.jpg

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yep, who owns this forum? Would they benefit from the downfall or at least benefit from discrediting alt's? Love conspiracies...ha!

See even the simple can make money here. Alt's can't be all bad.

Where there is money made, there is money lost.

AH HA! So it goes even deeper than alt's! lol

Aww bless limbaugh's little heart.  He called me simple lol.  Been called alot of names before, but that ones a first ;) 

read Hazard brave style in the fastcoin thread, he wants to do a 1 sec block time coin! Let's congratulate him, we should propose him to be the next Nobel prize candidate... ;D ;D ;D ;D

And I hope by now he would understand somewhat p2p coin, not to repeat the retarded comments like in that of luckycoin thread...

Its all a big joke until you're the guy left holding the VaginaCoin bag..  :'(

flashcoin....this is the answer  ;D

i Voted NO!
keep'em coming!

i think you probably only know the half of it.

open the bag up and sniff in it .

: D

I think you are blind to the freedom we all enjoy here...
Even if you ban someone there is nothing preventing them from making a new account.

Then there is the reason why you want people banned.
Simply wanting to remove that what you don't agree with is pretty egotistical.
In my opinion, if there is a bug in the system which allows the creation of new chains to subvert stronger coins then bringing out lots of new coins is the best thing that could happen. Cryptocoins are still kindof embryonic. I assume these kinds of developments are just growing pains. When a crypto curreny becomes a significant part of the world economy the kind and severity of attacks wil be much much greater than what you perceive here.
In my opinion it is not even an attack, it is simply riding out an opened door. Someone will allways try to ride out the opened door, no matter if you ban them or not.
So from my perspective all these altcoins is just part of a balncing the ecosystem.

If people want to invest in CuntCoin then thats their problem. If CuntCoin undermines another crypto then that other crypto was not very robust in the first place.
(btw. when is CuntCoin coming out?)

This is not true.
All blocks created (and thus all crypto coins created) require some specific work to have been done.
Without this work the crypto would not work.
So this work is inherent to all cryptocoins. You can even call it intrinsic value but you possibly need a systemic view of a crypto to apply that.

voted no. if hazard gets banned, who is gonna develop all these shitcoins?

I vote NO, I don't think he deserves to be ban, you can ignore him and his alt coins.  No one is forcing you to read his posts or mine his coins.

please do he is the biggest troll around here

 Please do, he's an utter moron, and he doesn't even realise all these shitcoins he's bringing out hurt the crypto scene in general.

unfortunately they are on same useless level as most other alts (especially those released in last week)

just ignore them

Mb some serious warning from moderators would be fair before banning

have you seen my profile pic?

Edit: what about hydro?

hydro should be first, that looser

voted NO, shouldn't be banned, hasn't done anything worthy of a ban. If people don't wish to mine his coins that's fine but yeah let's not have anymore coins for now unless they bring something new and useful.

Rather just make some union here not to mine any further coins unless they brings something new and follow a fair release procedure.

To be fair though weed coin was quite a fair release although other than that brought nothing new.

He shouldn't be banned but things like VaginaCoin, WeedCoin and similar crap should be removed and he politely warned that such things won't be tolerated.

Nobody can't and shouldn't stop him to offer coin creation services, that's his right and coin creation can't and shouldn't be stopped.

But there should be some standards and he went below those standards. This is not kindergarten, people are investing money here, we all are supposed to promote cryptocurrency to the world and stuff like "VaginaCoin" is just utter bulshit that should not have place here.

Wow, you guys are dicks. It's your stupid fault for having anything to do with the altcoins he makes, not his. You might as well ban everyone who releases an altcoin. He's actually done nothing wrong.

Edit: I know he's made a few and released them himself, but my point still stands. I really wish the altcoin forum was just about a few coins and not the shitstorm it is now. I personally think this altcoin subforum should be removed, until then, he has done NOTHING WRONG. He simply provided a service. It's incredibly ironic all the votes hes gotten for banning considering Bitcoins purpose was basically based on the freedom of controlling your own money. Can someone tell me one actual reason for banning him other than the fact that he does something you disapprove of?

The ONLY altcoin I think had (at least in concept) any interesting thing going for it is Namecoin. The rest are blatant clones of bitcoin that bring nothing new. For the end user, whatever altcoin you use, they are all the same as bitcoin except for the logo and name. There is NO incentive to use Litecoin/ feathercoin etc for any normal person finding out about cryptocurrency considering bitcoin's standing. ALL of the latest altcoins are based on the same premise:

Are you mad you didn't get into bitcoin early?

WHY NOT? What arbitrary standards are we setting?? Cause it has a stupid name??


No one is putting a gun to these people's heads and saying, BUY VAGINACOINS! Are you really gonna blame the creators of VAGINACOIN instead of the investors??

I voted no.

Hazard - I’m changing my vote to yes .....


unless you commit to making HelloKittyKoin, for me when the Netcoin code is released.. (i'll pay of course)




**

{Strike while he's vulnerable. that's what we will do. }
{Did i say that out loud?...shit!}

I invested pretty hard into vagina tonight actually .

love you baby !  :-*

So Hazard, what do you think, should you be banned or not ?

Yes, because it has stupid name and because it turns the forum to kindergarten. I hope we want introduce people to cryptocurrency as some serious thing and last thing they need to see when come here is peniscoins and vaginacoins.

Some of you may find that cool and acceptable but huge majority does not. And I lost lost of respect to Hazard when he accepted to release that crap under his name. Offering coin creation service is one thing and completely OK as far as 'm concerned but doing such stupid thing as releasing coins with such name is cheap, very cheap.

No one is getting into bitcoins in the altcoin forum. In my opinion, a stupid name for an altcoin isn't grounds for a ban or warning.

I never said it's for ban but I did that such launches should be removed and he warned to not do it again.

"Vagina Coin - coin you want to fuck"

That's pathetic, childish and turn this forum in horny male teens driven community, not the one where there are ladies too etc, etc...

Until a concesus is reached in this forum and the rules change. I don't think anything should be done. It may be childish, but removing posts for something which there is no rule for is unfair. If the rule is made, it also shouldn't be enforced retroactively.

I'm basically saying because it's childish isn't a good enough reason.

I just need a 'hide' button next to threads I don't want to see, not complicated.
it's the first time I've used the ignore button today, and it's not for Hazard

This is why I agree with the tag idea SaltySpitoon came up with.

What we are talking here will barely change anything. Moderators don't give a flying one and it's pretty unmoderated forum so I barely have any illusion that thread will be removed. I'm just saying what i think it should be done.

No serious forum should allow thread named like this:

"Vagina Coin - coin you want to fuck"

This is not porn forum, this is not football fans or some other macho men driven forum, it's serious forum with ladies around too and there should be some respect shown.

If anything this teaches us that the market for cryptocurrency consists mainly of horny male teens...
It's just an economic indicator.

What you say here sounds very much like critisizing the techno part of a music forum because you listen to brahms.
You want to deny people that you think less of a thing that you think less of because you think what you like is better.
That's pretty exclusioninst thinking if you put it to the test of the original ideas on which crypto currencies are created.
The original idea was anarchy.
You want freedom? Deal with it. :)

I agree with you that testosteron is the prevailing hormone on bitcointalk, but at the same time you have to realize this is simply how things are. Apparently this idea of cryptocoins at this time resonates more with horny male teens than with other parts of the population.

Why don't the ladies of bitcointalk make their own self-moderated testosterone-free section? If it has merrit it will become something. If not then not. Let the market decide.

Bullshit, it has nothing with phrase "let the market decide"

I think hazard is too busy making anal coin to care about this thread  ;D

shit those numbers don't look good Hazard, but then again it could all be spam like your coins.

can someone fill me in in on the "tag idea" ?

What horror this survey .. Whoever opened should be banned.
If everyone opened a post like this to ban someone he does not like, there would be just that on this forum ..

lol hazard got a lot attention

It's my idea you, you Hazard dick rider. You're probably one of his clients that's being penetrated anally as we speak.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=200377.0

Umm, yea ok--I tried to simply make it as easy as possible to make alt-coins for everyone and that's the thanks I get? Ha, no seriously, this:


Is exactly on point. Hey, don't get me wrong, I think Hazard fleecing people for these coins is silly. I think his constant bumping of his own threads with  ;D is even sillier, but truth is, "if you care, you have too much time on your hands." No, I was not impressed with VAG--its wholly inappropriate, but fuck, this isn't Reddit. Its not really /b/ either, rather somewhere in between. If you don't like it, IGNORE IT, better yet, go do something else. In the end the market will decide what coins stick and what coins don't--we're only a month in to this whole altcoin fandango and I for one can already see the silt settling.

Now as for some personal disclaimers--NO, Hazard, you DIDN'T tell me how to make my own coin work. You gave me a couple pointers but wouldn't give me enough and that's actually a good thing. It made me figure it out on my own and thats why I shared with everyone. I kinda figure if everyone can take a day and learn how to do what Hazard does, no one should be crabby about it.

Next up, HyperCoin is not a Hazard coin. I created it for zacho56 as part of a deal he and I are doing for me to sell him a PC for mining. Zacho hoped to pump and dump it--but you can see what I did with the bits I had, they were all given away in chunks of 300 in another thread. EZCoin is similar, I didn't create it, but did compile a Windows binary for it and given a nice 30K bounty. In return, I've doled out nearly 20K of them and have offered the last 15K I have as an exchange bounty--will they make any money? WHO CARES. If you don't like them, GO OUTSIDE.

:)

hazard is a fag

ok look , right,  i'm basically retarded ok so break this down for me...

but the Tag system , so this does not actually hide anything ? it just puts [ANN] type tags in front yeah?

seriously why not just make two subs , you only need two -

1. New Coin Announcments .

2. Forum Exchange Trades .

at least we know one of Hazards other accounts now.

Indeed, trying to force other people to act according to your liking has nothing to do with 'free market'.
Unfortunately 'free market' is one of the foundations on which all cryptos are based.

I symapthize with your views but in the end, in this situation, you can only prove your right by acting.
The only thing of value in what you say is that you note a difference. But you kindof end it in a "Go away!" statement which cannot be fruitfull because you are talking to a substantial part of the community.
If there is indeed a strong base for a 'serious forum with ladies too' then it would be easy to base an exclusive community on it.

In any case it is unrealistic (and in my opinion impossible) to have a public free-for-all global system that has a community of people that all behave like you want them to. If a community becomes large enough it will naturally start splitting into like-minded factions.
To me what you say signifies that this community has grown so big that sub-communities start to express themselfs strongly.
You may not like it but it is still an example of natural social dynamics.

Vote ban Hazard

Thats the bottom line. He dont like what hazzard has done or is doing so he wants him banned. No one has pointed to any rules broken which would result in banning.

Like I said I believe any poll around here due to people being able to make multiple accounts.

I like hazard, he's funny....

he is a child , finicky and he just wants attention 

Wow. Alreaddy reached page 8. Guys, i think it is time now to turn this in popcornthread.

http://www.bilder.beofnf.de/gifs/popcorn3.gif

I feel the same way about people who whine about other people all the time.

Is it impossible to agree with one of your points and not another? I did buy a coin from hazard, but mostly just as a joke (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219001.0) (this was before he made the thread he has now). I actually really dislike all altcoins in general and when we start splitting hairs on which altcoins should be allowed and which shouldn't, I kinda just don't want any of them.

Get a life

Thanks for sharing
http://laurajul.dk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Entertain-yourself-eat-popcorn-3D.gif


Making some more
http://download.installmob.com/animation/ccontennt/5816-f/microwave_popcorn.gif

what hazard does is only good.
educates people on how shitcoins are made and accelerates things. this whole altcoin oversaturation phase might have taken a few more weeks without him or shakezula's altcoin tutorial - and would have brought the world nothing

Yes, because of a poll we have a reason to ban Hazard.

As stated before, there's no rule against this. You'd be banning him for no reason, and if the mods/admins do it, I'm sure most of the community would want to know why.

And as I stated before, he owns a Alt-Coin making service.
--------
He's only following his client/customers wishes. If he didn't he'd be easily labeled as a scammer.
-----

And the epitome of the word class. What an upstanding member.

I never said Hazard should be banned. Period.

VaginaCoin, the coin you want to fuck" alike threads should be banned. That's what I'm saying. And there's no market bullshit there. Make an AdultCryptoTalk.org and launch that crap there, free market doesn't mean you can sell porn movies in schools, so free market doesn't mean you should launch such idiotic coins on normal, non-adult forum.

I don't mind any alt coin and my posts here can easily prove that. I didn't even mind porn or sex coins, I won't get involved with them on any way but these could be legitimate coins. VaginaCoin doesn't have any legitimacy and it's pure stupidity.

You can peddle porn movies in a school yard in a free and unregulated market fool. The reason why you cant is because of REGULATIONS.

That's exactly what I want here - regulations. To stop any idiot coming with VaginaCoin, PenisCoin, BukkakeCoin and similar bullshit.

I don't give a shit about free market if it means any idiot can do what he wants. There's no and will never be a free market of such proportions.

+1 Like

Because censorship is the answer to everything.  ::)

The fact that I can release a coin called VaginaCoin shows you how ludicrous this section of the forum is. You wouldn't see, for instance, a credit card be named PenisCard.

Uhhh so now you want to regulate bitcoins? I thought the point was to BE FREE of regulations...

Then you all for regulations Your in the wrong area then.

You open the door you fool your gonna open the flood gates and ruin what bitcoins is about.

No, why the fuck are you making shit threads like these in Alternate Crypto section? Take your bullshit to Meta, kthx

Bitcoin is already regulated and if powers to be decide to put it out of regulations you can put all your libertarian bitcoins in your ass, they'll be worth that much. If you haven't noticed that, you're taking some bad drugs ;)

All that, of course, doesn't have anything with this thread as we are talking here about forum regulating, not bitcoin regulations.

You don't give a shit about that. You're making money of it and stop pretending you are doing it to expose that something is wrong with altcoins. You're just using that line as excuse and to be considered cool.

That's why this thread exists - to try to stop this section of forum being ludicrous and you exploiting it. If censorship is solution, it will gets my vote though I doubt my one will be counted.

Hmmm, boobyCard....

Pretty sure, VagCoin was a joke...Lighten up...Fucking mormons, want to ruin the world for everyone. ::)

Yes ,yes And YES

the only issue with this is that hazard isnt breaking any rules, like sure he is spamming the forums with coins, but he isnt doing anything "wrong" because he isnt breaking a rule

I could make more money if I didnt offer my services to the public and instead just staggered the release of my own coins.

Its not about the money. Its about sending a message.

Hazard probably has 3 alternate names on this forum already so banning wouldnt really do anything... A lot of new coins are introduced by people with like 4 posts, so he could just make endless amounts of accounts and post crap troll talk all over to get his post count up. Doesnt matter, waste of time.. Dont ban him and then at least youll know its him! lol. Hazard is hardly the worse thing for this community. As has been already stated, dont participate in coins that are crap. People choose to mine them, are we going to ban all those people too? Va****coin thread should be deleted as its innappropriate.

How? Why?

I would agree with that, It would take an idiot to ruin their altcoin creation service by spamming it themselves.

I do like weedcoin though, lol. Even spent ages making a logo (take note hazard - still no reply)

K.

I like it.

Unless a better logo comes out within the next 24 hours, consider the bounty yours.

 ;D

K.

By a mod? I dont know! Just think its not appropriate. The altcoins that are crap will fizzle out and we will have a handful of meaningful coins that poke through in the end. I see Litecoin, BBQcoin, and possibly Netcoin once it launches as being long-time coins. Most of this other crap will just fade into oblivion once the exchanges drop em, flavor of the day style. If they dont, then who gives a crap? Mine what you want to mine and support what you want to support, let the pump n dump trend cool off a little.

if im not mistaken there was a flood of coins similar to this when litecoin came out. Most of them you probably cant remember their names. Liquidcoin anyone?

Litecoin was a 100% ripoff of tenebrix.

Yep. There are a few that I mine that I can mine worth a shit. Sometimes I try others when they first hit because I love seeing orphans with my power of 200khash ... but I look at it as fun. If they hit the exchange and I make a little... I could not be happier

Shuddup I mine LQC here and there.

Everyone has their opinions. I personally think everyone should get their chance. It's just like every other endeavor in life. You trolls come on here saying alt coins are fucking everything up because people don't know how to release them? Make your own coin. For Fuck's sake. Wasn't the idea of BitCoin to create freedom, upon many other things? You fucks wanting to ban an intelligent and helpful person for keeping cryptocurrencies open, alive, and just as easily started as a home project, are nothing but a bunch of bully wanna-be tyrants. Shit on someone else's parade. Or your own. Because your damn balloons are wayyy over inflated from all that damned gas from your shit.  

lol, someone should tell him, Vagina is not a swear word...He's putting the pussy, on a pedestal. Don't put the pussy, on a pedestal man.

No, you wouldn't. You would have same marketing skills and same amount of time to take care about all coins you created and you would fail to do it properly. This makes you guaranteed money initially from creation and makes you ready to mine few coins of each of them early as a bonus as you already have all stuff ready before launch  ;)

The other thing is that your message is stupid and pointless. I hope you don't really think that we don't know the points of that message without you being Robin Hood of cryptocurrency to point it to us  :o I'd rather you to have only $$ on your mind than to think this. First is legitimate thing, the other means you think we're all stupid and you're only clever one.

And again, I welcome each and every new altcoin, created by you or someone else as long as it's not stupid one like Vagina thing. They're all one kind of testnets and will lead to supercurrency on the end. There are already few that are miles better than bitcoin technically (actually, most of them are).

Well this thread is just more proof that the world is full of little wannabe, oppressive dictators (many would say "fascists", but that is not really the correct usage), who find it perfectly acceptable to use some type of "authority" to get rid of people/things/ideas that they don't like...for no better reason than the fact that they don't like it. 

Teehee

Anyway, first off, the problem is, until recently, there weren't new coins being made nearly as frequently, so there is no precedent to set what is acceptable, and what isn't. As of now, there really aren't any rules against making new coins, although there may be some changes fairly soon. Second, as much as people are complaining, I don't think I've seen a single report against Hazard (not that everyone should start reporting everything he says to make a point. Seriously, dont)

My vote goes to "No".



There's nothing explicitly in the rules of this subforum about doing crappy coin development. Furthermore, this sets a bad precedent about posting coin announcements on this subforum...who decides what a crapcoin is? And how easily abuseable will that mechanic be? It could be entirely possible to lock out development of all new coins, unless something is implemented properly and carefully.


However, with that said, maybe give Hazard a title like the "Great Shitcoin Spammer" or something. Just for laughs.




Final thought: With how easy it is to create alt accounts - and there seems to be one for every single scamcoin being created - there seems little to no point in limiting the number of coins a single user can "create" on this forum. Just my 2 satoshis.

Thats they way I was leaning myself. These people let the mask slip and now we know who wants "control"

There needs to be a Coin incubation forum where only forum FULL members + have a chance to look at the coin and deside on if it can be moved to the Alt Currency forum via vote margin of 65%+ support (All votes IP verified for fraud)

Ban the fucker. Nothing personal but an example needs to be made. You create shit coins, you get banned.

any rules here said you cant make shitcoins?
is it this a free market community?

Thank you for proving my point yet again.  Who decides what a "shitcoin" is?  You?

Careful, your Nazi is showing.

How about few of you fuck off with your nazi/fascist calling.

If the jackboot fits, wear it.  The attitudes conveyed in this thread are far more harmful to this supposedly "open source/free market capitalist/competitive currency" community than everything Hazard has ever done combined...not to mention harmful to society as a whole. 

So take your "fuck off" posts and shove them up your arrogant ass.  Who the hell are you to tell me what to do?  NOBODY.

Well, I decided to quickly look it up and it turns out that you are pretty close! He's only been reported a total of 3 times, with 10-15 days between each report. Therefore, I highly doubt that he qualifies for being banned under the existing guidelines, not that number of reports mean anything.

+1

If you don't like it.. stfu and move on.

hazard should use his talents for more constructive things, he prolly has some skill.

I vote no. His coins are bad. Banning seems wrong. First u must have a rule - he hasnt brokenn one yet.

where's the new coins at? it's so boring without at least a hazard coin a day....

It's a bit of fun, if you don't like it, then don't click his threads and shut the fuck up.

Looks like Hazard needs to just put in that little more extra efforts to meet the grade :)

This kind of people is really scary...
He should be the kind of guy who would decapitate his wife if she ever looks at his neighbour

ban ban ban, i dont like it

Wow
How regulation finally came from Bitcoin

I think we will attract a lot of new people on this forum with these kind of topics.

If I was new here, I would think "WTF ???"

Your true colors are showing...

What this all boils down to is this. We can't just warn/ ban people cause we don't like them or they violated some personal moral when no rule exists stating they did something wrong. By that token we could ban you.

I don't care what colors of mine are coming but if you could call me a fascist in real life you'd eat some grass smart boy.

It's enough that people are screaming "scam" for things that are no way scam, now you started with even more serious stuff, you fucking morons.

why ban him ? his coins are as useful as the other altcoins are.

I never called you a fascist and I don't think threatening people with violence is gonna get anyone to think more highly of you. I'm just saying that I don't like people who want to BAN people for doing something that they disagree with. People do a ton of things I disapprove of, but I tolerate them, not vote to ban them.

Then why the fuck have you reacted on me telling people with nazi/fascist calling to fuck off.

I did not vote to ban him and I said 5 times I wouldn't ban him, read better before you start discussion with someone. I did say and will say it million times as much as someone gets angry with it, that I would delete VaginaCoin shit and politely warn him to not do that kind of crap again here.

I'm fine with him releasing 60 coins / day as long as he doesn't act as kid with Vagina and Bukkake coins. It's bullshit.

And yes, I'd use violence if someone would call me nazi in the face. I won't tolerate that shit.

That's the thing. Until we define what is good and what isn't, removing coins that you think are stupid is censorship. And it's the internet, if someone calls you a fascist, I wouldn't take it too personally...

+1

http://lamelas.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/internetseriousbusiness.jpg

I put yes but Who TF Is hazard

Yes, it's internet but being called fascist is serious thing for me no matter what medium is used.

And yes, censorship isn't necessary a bad thing. There's million of reasons where censorship is thing to do and if I'd run this forum VaginaCoin wouldn't survive my first look at it. I don't so it did and probably will but that doesn't mean I won't tell what I feel about or that I'm concerned that someone will be upset about it.

I think the problem is who gets to decide? You and and a handful of other people out of how many?
Yeah thats a wonderful idea.

If I'd be a power to decide it, I would, you can bet on it. I'm not so there's no really problem or question here.

I can only wish those that are powers would do it but I don't really have much hope for it, if they wanted to do it, they would do it already.

By all means then go and make your own forum and set it up AS you see fit.

One of the reasons WHY I like it here. I dont have to worry about sallies like you trying deciding what is right and wrong. I have the freedom to make that decision on my own. Its awesome

this thread will make hazard be famous  ;D haha

ouaou ... this topic is on top all day ...

 It's because Hazard deserves it

By all means when you will be someone who'll tell me what to do and where to go I'll shot myself in the knee.

I'll give it a rest here though, I said all I had to say, it's just repeating now.

So..when are the mods here going to LISTEN to their community & ban this idiot?

What is this, some sort of witch hunt?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-001sVvgWol0/UY--VWEi5pI/AAAAAAAABhI/8X5KPBZ3ABw/s320/asante-u-mad-bro2.jpg

I'd also like to take this opportunity to announce FlashCoin, the fastest coin in the universe. With 6 second blocktimes, we'll be leaving the competition in the dust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=222450.0

lol

You didn't say that when the community was sure you were Thomas Nasakioto, you would have been banned too  ::)

This forum is not a democracy and so forth.

+1

I think all of the 'YES' voters would LOVE my new prototype for a new altcoin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=221425.0

Pure tyranny in every block! :D

:)))

Why ban him?

I like Vagina coins and other stuff :)

Exactly, WHY BAN HIM?
Yes, it's annoying for me seeing another three new coins next day, half of them made by Hazard.
But this is only my personal feeling.
How he can harm cryptocoin idea?
It's free market, Satoshi decided to make Bitcoin open source.
Yes, that's the way how we take a chance to understand notion of "open source" and " free market".



 

Bitcointalk is not a free market. There's a reason why we have moderators on the forum.

I'm still here. Are you upset?

Fun fact: you have a highlighted ignore button, I do not.

I've been here longer than you, and also not to mention that I have a lot of hate from the more richer BTC user's because I made a lot of good money off LTC.

we should probably ban people who try to sell pipes in the alternate cryptocrrenie's section also

This can be arranged  ;D

Try it. I dare you.

I'm sorry, I don't understand your point.
What are your charges against Hazard?
Would you explain it in less than 50 words?
Many thanks

Less than 50 words? Okay! He is spamming.

Ok, this may be considered as a charge... but it's still question of taste..

+1

BCX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <3 where have you been? I couldn't keep up with all your aliases and didn't know which account you'd be posting on. You're cooler than Hazard anyways. He's a fgt.

There's nothing to do but concur, because that's how it happened. To the tee.

So, you being in here, does that make you trash  ???

To clarify, I didn't protest the creation of this board, but I did say that if this board wasn't made, that trashing the posts was the only alternative. But yeah, this board was made as an alternative to trashing these posts.

On the plus side, deleting posts in here is a huge stress reliever.

Hazard is just a troll, trying to prove some point using the same methods as TradeFortress used to prove ripple was dodgy.

If TradeFortress is still around when some users reported actual loss of wealth after they took part in his "experiment", there is no way hazard should be banned for fooling people into spending a couple $ in electricity to gain useless coins.

Hazard's making a very valid point, as TF did.

Wow I cant believe the vote is in favor. Not like the mods will do anything they realize how stupid and pointless this all is. Hazard in no way should be banned

+1 true!

Welcome Hazard to DGC dev team!  :)

and it will fail like the 10 other altcoin forums.

Why is this a response to my post? I am in support of altcoins and innovation through them. I just think it would help reputation if we had a little bit of censoring (YES I REALLY SAID CENSORING!) of coins like Porncoin, Vagcoin, dickcoin, asscoin, things that are not appropriate and will turn people off from the process with the snap of a finger. To that, theres a new angel investment group that is shelling craptons of cash into bitcoin.. So, I dont think most bitcoiners even make it in to the altcoin forum.

Most people should be turned off from the process. We don't want investors taking altcoins seriously, because they will fail miserably and avoid altcoins altogether. Altcoins that are successful will get press outside of this forum and be taken seriously then, like Litecoin.

So you're backing Hazard, who trolls for the good cause, by issuing this whole altcoin shitstorm, as you supported TF when he launched his experiment to prove Ripple is dodgy, while sacrificing newbie's wealth ?

Yes.

Just saving this.
And to be honest, I'm really pleased with your answer.
Solid line, which i may not approve, but consistent nontheless.

Cheers.

The man fooled me with the WeedCoin while I was high haha shouldn't have been trading high. Broke a key rule.

Anyhow, he shouldn't be banned for it. We're all just retarded.

I avoid pipes, bongs and vapourizers for that very reason. The baked metal and plastic fumes make me dumb dumb. ;D

Btw.. if this thread killed Vaginacoin, I'll be pissed !

Hazard sets crypto back!!! he is vulgar and childish and should not have a voice on this elite forum. He creates distrust in crypto and brings shame to us all!!!!

Coming from the person who looks highly suspicious with his "BitBar" crap all the time.

Says the clown who claims to have created a scrypt ASIC for $4000  ::)

i originally voted no, but can i change my vote??  :P

The ignore feature on this forum does have its purpose.  The different shading of the Ignore link for quite a few forum members shows that it is being used.  If you don't like what someone has to say, you can chose to ignore them.  If you don't like the coins they have created, don't mine them.  

Sure you could make the case that suckers will then fall for pump & dump schemes/coins and, but reading through just the first few pages of this Alt forum should be enough to make anyone wary of where the point their hashes. Many people invested with Pirateat40 when you could clearly see that really WAS a ponzi from a mile away, and still others will claim until they are blue in the face that so it Bitcoin, although I disagree with that last one.

Caveat Emptor

PS - I have to admit I think Hazard does add to the entertainment factor of this sub-forum too /shrugs.

For posterity lest anyone forgets Hazards legacy as he attempts his latest scams.

Who are the best authors for creating a coin ? Looking for a coder for a serious project , not shitcoins

He should not be banned

I didn't even know that one guy greated all this shitcoins

lol. Burn the witch. Please ban mudafudder and that bcx-guy too when you are at it.

But if one shark keeps eating all the new surfers, there will be no surfers left. Banning will do little good but not banning will do real harm.

Imagine how many more people would be trading today if they hadn't been burned by this guys waterhole poisoning! You guys would be legitimate millionaires by now if all those people had a good first experience with altcoins. All he has done is drive people back to the false security of fiat banker monopolies.

What we need is a list of his alternate forum accounts, coins created by both Hazard and shakezula, and bounty for post their home address. We can start by looking at who voted no in this poll. They didn't just teach us about shitcoins, they set back the entire crypto movement by at least 2 generations and directly inspired articles such as http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelbobelian/2014/05/09/sec-warns-investors-to-beware-of-bitcoin/
and
http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/03/02/don-bitconned-digital-currencies-pose-hazards-for-investors/Xm6ew62ZPMV7kL27GC7wWP/story.html and, as some would say, are
singlehandedly responsible for the ban of all crypto in multiple countries. How in the fuck does that help us?
What was your stupid ass excuse for voting no again?
 

Is he banned?

I'm not sure, his last post was on July 24, 2014. There must be a reason his last post was so long ago.

You might be him? Way to bring back a dead thread..