Bitcoin Forum

---

Abstract
In this topic I created 5 lists for merit earners categorized by their initial merit drop and required merits for the next recognized rank.
The motivation is to set an example/live reference for everyone, especially for new members who think earning merit is too difficult. They tends to blame the system rather than admitting their own problems. If these members can do make it to the next recognized level then they (new members) can do it too.

List Summary (Click on the individual list for details)
List of 0 to 100 and plus merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101766#msg38101766)
List of 10 to 100 and plus merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38957395#msg38957395): Coming soon...  
List of 100 to 250 and plus merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38957441#msg38957441): Coming soon...
List of 250 to 500 and plus merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38957500#msg38957500): Coming soon...
List of 500 to 1000 and plus merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38957542#msg38957542): Coming soon...


Acknowledgement
DdmrDdmr: Provided initial data. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38717653#msg38717653)
LoyceV: Providing data. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38803979#msg38803979)
iasenko: Helping in collecting information.

_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} This is an on going list. If you are a 0 to 100 and plus merit achievers then please let me know I will add you in the list.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} The list is alphabetically sorted.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} Feel free to write me if you find any error in the list


¹_{In my opinion, if you have better idea about the individuals specialty please let me know.}
²_{The user or the community confirmed the achievement.}

On the comment section you will find some uncomfortable comments like # (http://archive.is/InztO#selection-2679.0-2679.64) # (http://archive.is/InztO#selection-3851.4-3851.64) # (http://archive.is/InztO#selection-4049.0-4049.64) etc (so far). I respect everyone's views but when it's showing anger, frustration from prior conflict of interests especially baseless accusations in most cases then it worth investigating before getting biased.

Here is a list of some members, I find annoying characters to me (just for me btw). They will try to bring everything (anything) they can with their baseless accusations (in my opinion, for you to make a conclusion - please investigate then justify). I try (will try) to avoid their negative inputs except they bring something good on the table.


¹ _{Edited after seeing this (http://archive.is/AGCQ6#selection-2865.0-2648.12) claim. Before investigating this user's comments (http://archive.is/Uees1#selection-5275.0-5275.45), please make sure to check the timestamps. He had no idea what was going on in BitcoinTalk earlier, especially merit system. He is learning new things since he opened the scam accusation thread against me - continuously adding excessive new contents on his old threads without keeping any log. This can cause confusions to the readers mind since my replies were based on his previous posts. He is doing this to ensure his ground looks very strong for someone who is new to this discussion. Like this one (https://archive.is/Uees1/d1295718c8cd52be58ca190c6fd09896c8b34e17.png) on here (http://archive.is/Uees1#selection-5275.0-5275.45). This comment was posted on this topic below (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38144785#msg38144785) by Jet Cash.
Few heavily edited posts:
Serial feedback blackmailer - mdayonliner #1 post (http://archive.is/MV6i7#selection-459.0-459.41) replaced by mdayonliner #1 (http://archive.is/5zTjF#selection-446.1-471.2)
Re:Serial feedback blackmailer - mdayonliner #2 (http://archive.is/MV6i7#selection-1242.1-1267.2) replaced by  Re: - mdayonliner #2 (http://archive.is/5zTjF#selection-1472.1-1497.2)
His archival seems not even loading previous data}

Congratulations. Great strategy. Make lots of posts in topics with "merit" as the subject, lots of self promotion and 5 new threads for something that you can say in one.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180522010319/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.0 (https://web.archive.org/web/20180522010319/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.0)

https://i.imgur.com/rkilvu1.png

https://i.imgur.com/my2og4F.jpg
Edited https://i.imgur.com/Jnge3sr.png / replaced previous image with error

https://i.imgur.com/jk64XXl.png

Most merit obtained from posting in threads with "merit" as the subject. (I probably even missed a few)

It is clear to me and others that "merit" is extremely important to you and that it is the motivation for some of your conduct.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101744#msg38101744 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101744#msg38101744)

The red is where merit was given and received from the same users or KNOWN alts / family.

Why do I care ? - normally I wouldn't.

But I am holding you to the standard that you are applying to others.

Do I think you exchanged merit  ? - yes I do. Not just with your brother. Just check the matching dates.

Do I think you have been deliberately merit farming ? - yes I do.

I've given you the same replies you give others. HERE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38046717#msg38046717)

It made you really angry and you haven't answered the accusations.

Why am I doing this ? To point out the hypocracy of your actions.

Do I want you to get into trouble for merit farming or exchanging merits ? No

I want you to admit and realise that your method and how you treat others (people you don't know)  is wrong.

Yes, but it beats abusing the merit system to gain merits for what amount to shitposts, followed by whiny bitching about the merit system once tagged for doing that.  Know what I mean?

I merited mdayonliner a few times, so you know his posts aren't bad.  It doesn't matter if some (or even all) of his posts were about merit--the point is that they were well thought out and constructive, and he's fairly adept at English.  Compare his posts to xtraelv's, and you'll see quite a contrast.

Most of his posts were dedicated to merit though, he has done a good job.
However, @xtraelv, your received and sent merits are not looking good, To be honest, I'm not accusing you. Almost all merits you received and sent are in a single thread. it looks awkward.

I agree it looks awkward and it has already been the subject of a thorough discussion here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390)
I have no control over who gives it to me and I feel sorry for Lafu that it ended up being scrutinised. Being dyslexic I don't often post - I often pass on information to others that have more flair for posting. So when I do post it is just for minor stuff.

Congratulation, who says sucking doesn't pay, if we look at your posts we'll see that you have been sucking for people in power and closed your eyes to the truth, all that matters is that you know I'm telling the truth.  ;)

Now let us have a fucking thread for every and each fucking rank up in this forum.  ;)

OP is jjust sucking the dick of high ranks.  You can tell that worm is just going around fishing for merit, he doesn't actually contribute much to this forum.

Now it's time for you to become a slave to DT members. keep blackmailing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3186068.0) people and have known extortionists supporting your blackmail attempts. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3186068.msg33007229#msg33007229) you could spend your life here as a slave. yes DT2 members are slaves. now keep celebrating man. I'm happy for you at the age of 35, keep this life and get paid a few bucks every week. keep blackmailing people so that people in power could reward you with DT2 status. how is this demonstration of impact?

I know truth hurts. tell me if I'm lying. tag me if I'm lying, I will come and would confess and would self-incriminate myself for you. people like you would never find anything of their own in their life. you will never be free.

My suggestion to you mdayonliner, be free, live free and die free. never allow anybody to tell you what you are. take a look at your actions and you'll see that I'm telling you the truth.

Cheers, even though I'm fasting, but a toast for you in your party.

Congrats on gaining 100 merits.

I'm not sure why your focus was on those starting with 0 merit. There are many members who have built on their basic rank allotment, and have received a few hundred additional merits. If your focus was on new members with single accounts, then it would be interesting, but I suspect that some in your list could be alts of established members.. That's just a guess, and I haven't done any investigation.

I don't have any issue with you so don't really want to go indepth in this but: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3502223.msg36761868#msg36761868 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3502223.msg36761868#msg36761868) Really ?

https://i.imgur.com/s6bQtNY.png

I understand that the other guy was being a dick but under the criteria - that is a "like" - not a meritable post. It is that easy to make a mistake.

Congrats OP, I also started with 0 merit, so I know your feeling.

Actually if we do not focus on accounts starting with 0 merits, we see more than 200 accounts reached 100 merits and more, see the list of these accounts here (data taken on May 12):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3759121.msg37064273#msg37064273

so this list is close to what OP have in mind, while it did not focus on the initial value of merit they started.

Congrats man, good work. Keep on doing the same and you gonna reach Sr. Member in no time :)

Isn't the whole point of the merit system to award posts that you like? Especially if they provide a benefit to the Bitcoin Talk community.

In my understanding, merit means "worth reading". You don't have to like or even agree to a post, for it to be worth reading.

Update: I totally forgot to say: Congrats!

waoo, congrats to gain 100 merits bro  ;D

Well, congratulations for what you have achieved, but is it really important to create a thread and let everyone know that you have ranked up by getting Merits?
I believe people showing off their intelligence in the sense of Merits don't really care about the forum or its quality, but they are only here to rank up and get the status of being intelligent or something, so that people in the forum see them like that.
If someone really cares about the forum, they won't care if they are getting a lot of Merits or nothing at all (they will get a lot most probably, if they only care about the forum), but they will just continue doing what they have been doing without all this celebrations and all.
I know it is not bad to feel good when you achieve something, but reacting like this makes it look like it all revolves around yourself and never has been about the thing you have been putting your efforts to.
That is what I think, and I'm not someone who thinks he is always right. So, it can be wrong.
Cheers.

If merit is that exciting to you for you to make a post about getting 100(to earn more, no doubt), maybe you shouldn't have received any.

Merit is a reward for good posting, but it shouldn't be the sole focus of your time here, which seems to be the case.

Congratulations, I'm wondering how come you can create 800 posts in such a short time? I registered two weeks after you, and here I am only trolling on this forum. Your post count is just a hardcore tryhard, damn! But, your effort speaks for itself though. I guess I'd be more motivated. My goal is only 10 atm.

Congratulations!
I hope that those who have gotten their 100 merit could also help me to attain such by sponsoring a puzzle.
I am focusing on giving merit too thru a Bitcoin Forum Puzzle.
The Bitcoin related Cryptographic Puzzle could be sponsored by a member (giver of reward merit);
Once another user cracked and successfully answer the puzzle, a merit reward will be given.
You can visit the thread here at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3103583.msg32048143#msg32048143
Again congratulations, btw a user who have posted more than 150 before merit started could have acquired initial 10 merit.

Congratulations OP, you’ve done it the hard way. Is there really only 3 posters who have ranked up since the Merit system was introduced?

Oh & fuck all the jealous posters in here trying to belittle your achievements, they’re only jealous.

Congrats OP. I'd say some people are just plain jealous that they can't earn as much merit as you did. sMerits are pretty much limited by now and I don't think you have cheated your way to get that much merit. The fact is, I think everybody that gave you merit is conscious enough to decide for themselves if you do deserve to receive that merit. Looking at your merit, you received plenty of merit from people that would likely not give merit just for kicks.

Edit: Oh by the way, I think I just discovered xtraelv has been abusing the merit system. If DT members could check his merit summary you will see that he has been exchanging merit with user Lafu back and forth.

Edit 2: Well, I think OP beat me to it, I hope some DT members could check on this guy. Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.msg37797512#msg37797512

Sherlock - Let me save you some time - Read here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390.0)


If you are going to do show and tell make sure you show them the UPDATED posts rather than just the ones that you think make you look good.

Your post wasn't posted at the date of the post - it showed reserved for a long time. You've only posted that in the last hour or so.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38055077#msg38055077 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.msg38055077#msg38055077)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.msg37774968#msg37774968 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3168616.msg37774968#msg37774968)

https://i.imgur.com/b4Mkk0H.png

All the abuse and multi thread posts are just a distraction. Just answer the question (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4221113.msg38445646#msg38445646) and accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4019640.0)  

I'm certainly not jealous of the time OP spends merit farming. I just think he's trying to utilize tactics that have worked for others to gain additional merit. He even referenced these threads that have previously been posted to celebrate rankings that have received merit. I simply believe there's an ulterior motive to this and don't approve of kool-aid sipping echo chamber merit threads. If members continue to receive merit for these, we're setting a precedent that will lead to more 'YAY 100 MERIT' threads. I'm over it.

I think it's fascinating that so many members+ delete posts that aren't receiving merit prior to the server updating activity count in order to make it seem like they have a higher quality contribution. We regularly condemn newbies for posting too much, but completely ignore members+ who have posted hundreds of times in 2 weeks because they know how to game the system. Seems slightly hypocritical to me.

Everything about this post is what's wrong with the forum... you're clearly bragging about merit farming on a post to congratulate yourself to farm more merit.

Here are some highlights I've been gathering about your method:

Talk down to people you are in the pool with to separate yourself out. (check)
Constantly make your accomplishments seem like normality to make other's complaining about it seem like crybabies to appeal to longtime posters. (check)
Constantly post only in merit relevant posts and also act condescending towards others and to draw attention to your posts. (check)
Make milestone posts bragging about merit to in essence be front page newsworthy to farm more merit. (check)
Congratulate all your haters to seem like you're above it. (check)


You really got it, dude... you have found the perfect way of manipulating the system, and a deadset formula to how to push it into your favor... wonder what happens when everyone becomes carbon copies of you... imagine how really great this forum will really be.

I used to want to play this game when I first started.  But the more I see you abuse it, the less interested I really am. 

Surely we can all agree that one one word posts that aren't in English isn't a good way of determining ranks.. and obviously, activity wasn't the solution to this problem... but is this as an example above, what people really wanted in this system?  He isn't the problem.. the fact that this as a strategy and works, in my opinion, is.


My 2 pesos... take it or leave it.

I am gonna ignore xtraelv and digaran types. The added section under the OP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101775#msg38101775) explains it better. It's ok not to waste the time in negative energy.

Thank you EVERYONE for all the good words and wishes. I really appreciate it.

---

I know there are like sncc said (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38144452#msg38144452) however, the motive behind creating the original topic is to inspire new members especially who are starting from 0 merit. I have full support for the members who started with even 10 to 1000 initial merits. I saw claims like "start from zero merit then you will see how hard it's to get merit."

Most of the low rank members (below Member or Member) thinks that higher rank members like Sr, Hero, Legendary receive merits easily and they don't. The  list of 0 to 100+ merits is a list to show them that they are completely wrong. Perhaps this could change their mindset. An example is already here (https://prnt.sc/jl8zh8) in this topic.

I actually did not have it in mind but isn't it a prove that getting merit is not how they (new members) look at it when they start from nothing?

---

I do not have a day job to do or any active business that requires a lot of time. So mostly, all day I spend on the forum.  ;D
I am glad the topic gives you positive vibe. Hang on here and you will reach your goal sooner or later.

---

Are you meaning them (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101775#msg38101775)? Nice joke btw  :)

---

Thanks for the vouch @Qartersa

---

Alone055 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38154765#msg38154765), atrocityx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38192686#msg38192686), Dilemmaremma (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38186219#msg38186219) - I have full respect on your views. In a community we won't always find people with same interest.

---

I thought to make a new post with a response to everyone so, I deleted the reserved (https://prnt.sc/jl9lcx) space earlier.

PS: Good to see the melon guy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38112738#msg38112738) again. Hello!  ::)

Congratulation on your first 0,1K Merits!

I was reading the whole thread and was astonished how it seems more like a war zone than anything else. It seems that, over time, this kind of topic doesn’t provide the excitement that the initial ones created, where champagne bottles were being virtually uncorked throughout the thread, injecting intravenous moral for the OP while petting the ego gently. 
Perhaps there could be a subsection for merit achievements, but the thread would be pretty rawboned…

ah come on why do you take merit so important and trash your life with it? no one knows how many years this forums will continue to life on. it might be gone in 3 years.

this forum is just all about bitcoin core cheerleading, it will be replaced by better forums

Where did you get this idea LOL
My life is very much ok, in fact better than the average (with due respect) people.

---

Update:
- Everyone has their own freedom of speech however making it a war zone - really is a pity. May be they feel good by doing it. Let them be - who cares.

By the way thanks for the wish mate. Keep up the good works.

That isn't true, though.  Even if he wants to get merit--which a lot of people do, and it's a hot topic around here--he does contribute to bitcointalk, and his posts are well-constructed, and you can tell he puts some thought into them.  His grasp of English isn't perfect, but it's perfectly acceptable.  I've given him a few merits since Janurary because I thought the posts I merited were worthy of them.  

There are many members here who make posts that you can tell are just attempts at squeezing merits out of suckers, but those posts tend to be very poorly written and the content is usually a sentiment that's been expressed many times before.  Mdayonliner's posts, by comparison, are constructive and he's done a good job reporting cheaters.  I respect anyone who does that, unless they prove themselves to somehow be a scumbag otherwise, and that has happened.

I'm not getting involved in this beef between xtraelv and mdayonliner any more than I have and won't unless it becomes very obvious that something is amiss.  At present I have no problems with either member.

No, I don't think that's true.  There was a thread about members who've ranked up since the end of January, and there were more than three if I recall correctly.  And I am glad that there haven't been many people ranking up, because most of them are spammers and don't deserve to.

By the way, anyone know what happened to nullius?

Congratulations, man for hitting 100-merit milestone.
You are one of the most motivating case studies that constructive users can rank up with or without merit system.

I was always a bit cautious about him. I felt that he was a bit of a shooting star, and unfortunately he was unlikely to become a permanent member. I'm sure he was/is an alt. The interesting question is whether he is an alt of an existing member, or some other Bitcoin personality. Give it a month or so, and people will be suggesting he is Satoshi himself. :)

That guy is probably an alt of Theymos, another alt as an effective to demonstrate that there are big odds to rank up with merit system.
Nevertheless, I feel very impressive with what that guys done, both knowledge, skills, smart approach to express ideas and beg for merits (just kidding).

I don't understand why people cannot just learn to separate issues around here. You create a posts around merit, its castigation, you don't get merit, you don't rank up. You agree with people their opinion, you are tagged slaves among other things. I really don't see anything wrong in what he is doing. People should be free to do what they want so far they believe they create value and someone who is impressed by it merits it. I don't think anyone is force to give it merit and as at the time of reading this, no one has given him a merit. I have given someone a merit simply because he gave advise on how to earn merit in a decent way and this is only highlighting how some people who have 0 merits and worked the way up as form of encouragement to those who complain about how unfairly skewed the merit system is from the way I see it.

I realized that I hadn't merited you at all,so I gave you one. Your guides and posts in general are more than good enough. I have read your posts quite a few times and found them helpful/thoughtful and even insightful. Congratulations.

---

People already have,have a look: Who is nullius? #nulldox  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3086927.msg31834011#msg31834011)

Shortly before his sudden disappearance, he was turned in to a newt. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2975479.msg33000159#msg33000159) Perhaps he is still out searching for the ingredients for the cure, which may explain his absence from the forum.

Congrats on your new achievement. There's this thing I have noticed, once a talk about merit pops up, the Ops history is being dug up and fingers starts to point and argument gets hitted up and what happens next is history. Let's celebrate merit achievements without pointing fingers to how it was farmed everyone knows the merit deal.

Remember me? Once you've put some effort to make a post that has some benefit, you'll get merits. Look at my merit, it's indeed increasing. It's not a rocket science. Maybe I'll create some more decent quality post in the future, or I'll just chill and shill. At least, what OP's doing is like a morale boost. Damn, 900+ posts! Get a real life bro! :)

Yes I can recall. I am glad that the motive of creating this topic has paid off. At-least one person found it inspiring and working on improving. When I am replying you, you have now 17 merits. 2 to 17 in in no time (less than 2 days). Jet Cash was asking me why I was focusing on those starting from 0. I saw a need for mental support, motivation, collection of examples for these newbies who think starting from 0 is really hard to rank up.





Congratulations! Keep up the good work.

---

- Thanks guys, I appreciate these kind words.

- People have freedom of speech. Your attitudes reflects your achievements. I don't mind it at all (their negative inputs). I am very clear about what I am doing here.

PS: Seems like I need to change the topic title a bit, the community is missing nullius. I do wonder why did he disappear. Hope he is in good heath and ok.

I think this man (tvplus006  - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1311641) has to be a part of your list. He is doing is really useful and really hard work everyday, without holidays.

I guess your list is a Hall of fame! These men are so useful for forum, really good Members.

Almost all of his posting is to do with bounty and other stuff that is clogging up the forum. I think it's time he took a long holidy. Fortunately nearly all of his posts are on boards that I ignore.

I had the same feeling like Jet Cash for this user tvplus006, after seeing the merit buttons (http://archive.is/UZnRI#selection-77.0-105.6) on the table (http://bounty.slavyansk.biz/) associated with his new 🔥 THE TABLE OF NEW BOUNTIES  🚀☀️ (http://archive.is/h6bnH#selection-493.0-493.37) topic. It's kind of off forum merit asking IMO however it's clear the user has determination and is putting a lot of efforts on maintaining that topic.

mdayonliner, as a complement to your list, I believe the following 19 people have become Full Members starting from 0 (some you have already listed):

There are also at least 590 users that have ranked-up to Members using the Merit System. I've only focused on users created from the 27/11/2017 onwards, since they started off from a rank with no associated Merit (thus some names from your list are missing in mine).

I would have liked to derive the complete user list, but unfortunately, this cannot be answered completely due to the lack of a snapshot created just when the Merit System kicked-off  (i.e. User, rank, activity, airdrop, etc.).

There are bound to exists more cases, at all rank levels, but it's quite a gruesome task to try to find out exactly who they are without making plenty of mistakes, due to the lack of the above stated information.

Thanks mate, you rock! I will soon update the list. Thanks for your input again. Much appreciated.

You are right indeed but mdayonliner did not focus on merit alone. I did see mdayonliner's post help other people in this forum. Mdayonliner did contribute to this forum that is why he earn merits. Most members agree to mdayonliner's post and then give merit not because all did find mday's post helpful.

I forgot to point out that 5 of the listed cases are tagged by DT for some reason or other ... 26,31% of them. Dammit, just when we wanted to bring some good news around ...

19 People
5 Already tagged as merit abusing

 Urbinklin    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1462029)
 udivkx   (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1437751)
 asche  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1580039)
 LastJedi     (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1381008)
ToTheMoon_XOM9IK  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1499733)

And 1 or 2 that can be tagged easly
JaoBadjap     (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1393407)  <- easy
Early_Waffle    (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1380108) <- harder

For almost 40% of abusers!  ::) ::) ::)

Congrats to OP, working hard on the forum and now he has a full member rank, his motivation to have some merit that makes easy to rank up. I agreed that what pharma said he has a good post that deserving to have smerit.
Just a short time you are now a full member mate job well done, I saluted at you.

I hope you are the one who becomes an inspiration to newbie members here start with zero merit and now officially full member rank.

I can only say that means the system works. Abusers get caught, legit users are scarce. But that was to be expected.

I'm especially suspicious if people got exactly 100 or 250 merit in a few bit chunks, and then stopped receiving anything. That most likely means they traded to fill their exact needs.

It's still on my TODO: combining theymos' data dump and the current merit amounts in each profile is enough to determine the Merit airdrop for each user, which is enough to deduce their "starting" rank.
I've been postponing this for too long, I hope to find some time tomorrow. I'm very curious to see stats on who ranked up.
Once I get it all figured out, I'll include it in my weekly updates.

Yes is working great but we (as forum in this cause, you DT members) need to be more strict to punish abusers.
Also maybe we need to add/change some sources? This month we have less sMerit distribuited than sMerit generated. ???

I remember this:
I've been on DT2 for 2 months now, and only tag red on accounts that I believe deserve it without a doubt. So far I haven't tagged merit abusers, and I'm not planning on changing that. I do like how the 5 merit abusers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38728674#msg38728674) received red trust from 5 different DT-members. That seems better than all of it coming from the same person.

Well guys, I will say it's more!!!
Unfortunately it 15/24 are questionable (!!!) Check yourself (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101766#msg38101766).

It's a big question (?) how these members are misusing merits.

Wish they would. These merit abusers has their own excuses and lately I noticed IT WORKS. I feel in need of shifting my energy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4308098.msg38701877#msg38701877) to something else.

Probably more. Does copy and paste of copyrighted material deserve a merit ? How much is required for it to be plagiarism ?
I'm not making accusations - I'm asking a genuine question.
There are genuine reasons to copy and paste and it is unpleasant to have to click a link to go to an article but there are also copyright to be considered.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3229077.msg33604305#msg33604305
Each part of the post contains a substantial part of the text from the source.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3227373.msg33573324#msg33573324
http://www.interaksyon.com/bsp-requires-banks-to-set-up-e-payment-channels/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3490334.msg36141910#msg36141910
http://www.statdomain.org/wiki/index.php/Silk_Road

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3240404.msg33745494#msg33745494
https://bitpinas.com/cryptocurrency/cryptocurrency-wallet-philippines/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3239899.msg33740647#msg33740647
https://news.bitcoin.com/trading-cryptocurrencies-like-a-boss-takes-time-and-research/

He is clearly citing the source so plagiarism is overruled, and for his efforts bringing up something to the community deserve merit (not everybody reading news)

So plagiarism would be the wrong word. Copyright infringement ? I agree it is newsworthy and clicking links is a pain.


I agree that the system overall works. Anyone rising rapidly would require some of the merits from DT2 members and smerit sources to level up quickly. There are not enough merits floating around to do it without obvious systematic abuse.

There is a risk that too much tagging for spam or merit will make the real $ scammers look more legitimate.

Don't want to repeat what has already been discussed in another topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32771539#msg32771539


P.S. Statistics of my reports are available to administrators

mdayonliner, do you have any more questions?

Maybe you don't trust the forum administrator which is appointed xandry staff of the Russian section of the forum?

On the whole, the Merit System seems to be working as a double-edged sword:

- On the one side, less people are ranking-up (and I’m not just talking about the younger members), and at a slower pace too. Those that do rank-up, put quite a bit of effort into it, so from the Forum’s content perspective that is something favourable.
- On the other side, numbers are pretty low, and even worse if we dissect the profiles of ranked-up members and determine that a large amount are DT tagged or suspicious to say the least.

Talking about suspicious cases of merit abuse and plagiarism, as can be seen on this thread and multiple around, we can encounter endless loop situations where by one is detected as suspicious and reported multiple times overtime for the same facts, even if the case is cleared or, at least, not proven wrongful without a shade of doubt.
Here again, we have the double edged-sword:

-   If they are not re-reported, they may be left aside as unresolved and thus remain exempt.
-   If they are re-reported it’s easier for them to be looked into, but innocent cases could incur in the endless loop situation.

Since there is no "global ledger" with the cases and their status of resolution, and a protocol that is guided by it’s use, endless loop situations will occur. But because there are no crystalline rules on how to proceed, so will the abuse continue as a means to bypass the difficulties of getting merited.

As shahzadafzal stated, the posts your quote always reference the article source, so there is no real issue here. Most of the news sections do the same, or even sections like "the wall observer" where it is often done in a graphical manner. Informative posts that cite the source should be that, informative, and could lead to getting good debates in motion.

Content has got much better since the introduction of the merit system, however regarding users ranking up slower; That's working as intended, although it might be true that only exceptional members are going to rank up multiple times we should see an improvement in this when there's a few hundred merit sources.  



Low amounts of merit being traded between alts isn't a problem as they'll likely run out of sMerit before they rank up any of their accounts. If they are trading a large amount between their accounts then this should be fairly easy to recognize. The users that feel they need to trade merit between themselves aren't likely to put in the effort to get external merit either.

Screen captured for the record:# (http://Re: Celebrating my 0 to 100+ merits and demonstrations of impact) # (http://archive.is/xHf1D#selection-6889.0-6889.64)

xtraelv, use search option and find related topics about your concern. If my memory serves me right then we already have a topic where we talked about plagiarism and citing. Don't ask question here and there which makes you sounding stupid. Please back off!

These people proved themselves to the community, they care about the community. They are not shamelessly using bitcoinTalk and its resources to promote some shitty/shady exchange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4031390.msg37932249#msg37932249).

You have problem with me not with others. Deal with me! Let them enjoy on what they are good at.
You still have following time left.
https://i.imgur.com/o8IPrKR.png

PS: I see you removed the original tag (https://prnt.sc/jmnlu6) and tagged me with a new one (http://prntscr.com/jnidcz) without even waiting for my feedback where I gave you 7 days of time to finish your investigation. Seems like you have done with your investigation but too coward to wait for my response? Or it's a Moral hazard from your side?

---

update1:
Good to see that you are working to improve yourself: Most iconic bitcointalk threads. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4322078.0) archive (http://archive.is/LL0T4)
But again, if my memory serves me right then there is already a similar topic. Your the search option.

update2:
Legendary profiles of bitcointalk. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3247239.0)  <=== Thought to save your time.

You're right. You can backtrack using the initial airdrop as a measure for the initial Rank. I did it like this at some point in a post from way back, but somehow got confussed now with the initial sMerit <> initial Merit (obviously).

Based on what I can see, if I'm right, we have:
 
- No one has made it to Legendary
- 8 to Hero (from Sr. Member)
- 33 to Sr. Member (from Full Member)
- 21 to Full Member (from scratch; two more than on a list I found yesterday with older creation dates), and another additional 53 to Full Member (from  Member)
- 1.614 to Member (starting from Jr. Member or below).
-> I'm only listing regular ranks here, since I don't know how the initial Merit played out with Copper Members, VIPs, and so on.

The above data is based on all historical records, and not using as a safe baseline a certain date of account creation onwards.

Since you're going to detail the users I'll stop here, but the above could serve to cross-reference our results to double-check.

A very late greeting for you mate, as for me, I didn't seem to be active this lately but still I'm watching your posts recently and almost all of it has a quite good representation of demonstrating Merits on how it was.  ;D ;D ;D Another fellow made it on the ranks, I guess it wouldn't be less possible if some people are having such posts like yours. Congrats :)

Can we have a full list till full members? I think we can skip the Members.

LoyceV called dibs on detailing these cases, so I believe the right thing to do is wait for his data and simply use my aggregate as a contrast.

I would love to create more list like the 0 to 100+ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101766#msg38101766), sepreate table but same format. I am thinking of three more lists:

100 to 250+
250 to 500+ and finally
500 to 1000+

I would appreciate if any of you DdmrDdmr, LoyceV can provide me the raw data.

---

Update:
Also a list of 10 to 100+ merited members.

I think nullius will be on every list that you will make :) Even if he's a human, but still he's totally out of everyone's league here. Hoping to find someone like him or even better to him.

As for the data that you need I think you should also include zentdex.

Thanks for the shout out mate. I appreciate your positive input.

zentdex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1331637) - has s/he started from 0 merits. Looking at his profile (November 20, 2017) seems like s/he was already a member and started with initial 10 merits. Can anyone confirm?

I can confirm he started from 10 Merit.
Last Friday:
He now has 270 Merit, and received 6 since Friday.

Yes, he might not started at 0 but still he gain more than a hundred, and now he's also on the verge on getting more out of his styles in posting and gathering data. He might also be of help for you to know some other accounts that you wish to know and have it documented. :) Although LoyceV was already good enough to do things that's necessary for you profile but still having a lot more people will do more awesome thing :)

Confirmed started from 0 or from 10?  :)

Fixed. 254 + 6 + 10 = 270.

His profile link should be made sticky in meta so that others can also follow and learn from his posts. I will be bookmarking this post to check his posting history  myself later when I have some time.

I am happy to see that more than 1000 people became members here from jr members after merit system.

I think I must be the only person who put nullius on ignore. I thought he was a shooting star, and an alt that had been sent here as a wind up. Look at his profile.

Name:    nullius
Posts:    933
Activity:    168
Merit:    725
Position:    Copper Member
Date Registered:    March 29, 2017, 08:17:00 AM
Last Active:    April 24, 2018, 11:02:30 PM

What we need here are good stable members who will support the forum, and not temporary visitors, who are here to do a bit of ego stroking.

Aah, I see... It seems, indeed you are telling the truth (http://prntscr.com/jnq5c5). Sorry mate. I will remove the isQuestionable tag.

---

update: Done @Alex_Sr

- What if he is not physically ok. No one just doesn't know his current situation. I really hope that he is both mentally and physically healthy.
I do agree that he might be an ALT.

I think these three can be added to your 0..100 list:

user_id   name   posts   activity   merit   rank   DateCreated   MeritReceived   MeritDiff
667927     Paractor   269   269   133   Full Member   2015-11-27 09:16:54.000   133   0
1268116   vlad230   515   168   138   Full Member   2017-10-31 16:36:47.000   138   0
1038794   deeperx   985   182   359   Full Member   2017-06-20 17:47:21.000   359   0

They were created before the trimeframe window I used as a safe to list the 19 cases I gave you before, thus they didn't show up. All three cases seem to have gave gained all their Merit without an actual initial Airdrop.

On the other hand, this case should probable be excluded strictly speaking:

user_id   name   posts   activity   merit   rank   DateCreated   MeritReceived   MeritDiff
1381008   LastJedi   280   182   122   Full Member   2017-12-05 02:10:06.000   112   10

The user seems to have has an initial airdrop of 10 Merits, which is weird considering the date creation of the account (05/12/2017), which is at worst 52 days before the Merit System kick-off (night of 24/01/2018). That in theory means that activity would have been less than 60 at the time, and therefore should not have been a Member yet during airdrop (thus I expected to see no airdrop). There must be something about how activity kicks in that I still haven't got a grasp on...

I didn't do the calculations for that member, but for reference, I gained 28 activity points in the first two days of membership, after that it reverted to the standard 14/14 rule. I believe that this is the fastest you can pick up the initial 28 points.

Now this may be interesting to see too:

Acording to my data, as of 25/05/2018 we have:
Set 2 (25/05/2018):
      0  Legendary
      8 to Hero (from Sr. Member)
    33 to Sr. Member (from Full Member)
    21 to Full Member (from scratch; two more than on a list I found yesterday with older creation dates), and another additional 53 to Full Member (from  Member) = 74
    1.614 to Member (starting from Jr. Member or below).
-> I'm only listing regular ranks here, since I don't know how the initial Merit played out with Copper Members, VIPs, and so on.

I just went over a post of mine (Which Ranks send sMerit to which Ranks - and who ranked up (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3218442.msg33469339#msg33469339)) with data up to 23/03/2018, and back then I reported:
Set 1 (23/03/2018):
    0  Legendary
    4  Hero Members (from Sr. Member)
   18 Sr. Members (from Full Member)
   39 Full Members (from Member, 3 of them from lower ranks)
 975 Members (from Jr Members or lower)

The comparison is interesting, since it shows the gain in a two month period of time:
Set 2-Set1 (gain in two months):
    0  Legendary
    4  Hero Members (from Sr. Member) -> same
   15 Sr. Members (from Full Member)   -> 16,67% decrease vs Set 1
   35 Full Members (from Member, 3 of them from lower ranks)  -> 10,26% decrease vs Set 1
 639 Members (from Jr Members or lower) -> 34,46% decrease vs Set 1

Since Set1 was derived two months after Merit System Kick-off, the timeframes are all in two month periods.

So as we can see, if we compare results, is that there seems to be a decrease in ranking-up speed as time goes by. This is probably related to the decrease in overall weekly sMerit being awarded, specially compared to the first month.

Thanks, Talk merit. Yes,something like what you mention must be going on in the case I was puzzled by.

I was surprised to see that. I thought that the cron job for activity calculation ran every 14 days, but it seems that it may run at hourly intervals for new members. If this is true, then it shows an interesting level of sophistication in the forum ranking system. Obviously new members will be encouraged to post more if they see their activity increasing as they start. Having to wait 14 days doesn't provide the same incentive.

Is it possible that you registered the day before the 2 week changeover? You obtained 14 activity on your first day (the last day of the 2 week activity period), followed by 14 activity in your second day (the first day of a new 2 week activity period)?

That is exactly what happened, and it was planned by me to see how the system worked. The surprise was that I didn't get the 28 activities in two 14 point hits, but that activity increased shortly after each post during the first couple of days of membership.

Ahh, I'm with you. So the forum software recalculates activity on an hourly (or close to hourly) basis, rather than once every two weeks.

read the topic and realize that the person who does it, it is in life - Squealer. How can you be so jealous, like your forum money gets taken away.
Remember, son, you're a stupid Snitch and your children will be snitches.

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D



Go whine on me, better cry and tell your mom that you were on the forum hurt.

But it only seems to do it for new members. Any posts I make now, won't be credited until the end of the period.

Actually, I've just had a thought. Because I've got a load of potential activity, it may start the update at the beginning of the period. This means that as long as I've made one post, I'll get the full 14 at the beginning, and then have to wait for the next period to get some more. If I don't have 14 of potential activity, then it will top it up as I post until I get to the 14 limit. That would be esier to program that having to check ranks.

You are correct. You simply have so many posts, that as soon as it enters a new 2 week period, you immediately cap out with an additional 14 activity.

It's a long time since I read those threads, maybe I should revisit them. :)

Huh!!! What did I do to you? At-least give me some clue.

---

I see a lot of feedback since I logged out last night especially some data from DdmrDdmr. I will update this post in few hours. Need to go out for a while.

---

Update: Please click here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38901728#msg38901728)

I just know a man who's earned an honest way merit, and because of you he was taken for a fraud, although it's not true!

Tell me honestly, do you like being a Snitch, or did you get paid for it?)

Congrats on getting 100+ merits! Good to know that good portion of those merits received by doing a very important job of catching merit abusers. I thank you personally for busting them!

Mate you are complicating the whole thing too much. Do we have any issue with each others? I guess not. You are coming here out of no where and cursing me without even understanding anything. That's too harsh even though I am not sure if the curses really work or not. It's funny, isn't it?

I assume you are defending Alex_Sr, right? Am I accusing him/her or anyone for the merit they received on this list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101766#msg38101766)?
 
NO!!!

- I said the gains are questionable and people should not take encouragement from this kind of merit gains. Does that mean I accused them? It's not accusation, it's a warning message for the readers. That's it.

- Does this anyhow means that Alex_Sr and others getting blamed for the whole thing? We are actually waiting for xandry to give us his/her inputs so that we understand the whole thing a bit better.

You are just absorbing the information from wrong direction. Do you understand (if) the reasons of your curse are not valid then it can reverse back to you (assuming you are very religious from all these serious cursing LOL).

Now you tell me honestly, did you even understand the whole thing before stepping in here? By the way, don't just paint peoples trust page with red tag out of bad feelings and if you do then keep a reference at least to prove your point.

PS: For the record, no one is paying me for nothing however you are welcome to pay me if you want to LOL

---

Thanks DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38847763#msg38847763) for the information. I will update the table after I finish posting this.

Members almost spent their initial airdropped sMerits now it's getting harder for them to have more sMerits since they (most) are not earning much Merits as the time goes by. My guess is the ranking up percentage will drop significantly in the future too. We will also see less merit abusing.

---

Thanks for the kind words @coin5haker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38888177#msg38888177)

Fun to see how o_e_l_e_o ignited Jet Cash to go back to basics.  ;D

No! Not him. But I can tell he's already had his reputation ruined.
Here on the forum, a lot of multi-accounts, why you do not do them?
Why set up honest people? Did you ever think that he, for example, had a family that he could no longer feed? NO? Then you have no soul at all and your activity justifies your personality. If you are a friend, lived somewhere near Russia, I would be with you so not talking and I would talk to you for a man!

UNFAIR!

That seems to be my problem - I never go back to basics. :)

I agree with the fact that cheaters have no place on the forum. But what does it have to do with ordinary people?

Update:
Too much negativity on the list because of the only one column: isQuestionable?² (http://archive.is/kA0Ft#selection-2527.0-2551.2)

After having a little discussion with one of the member (don't want to mention the name since I never asked him if I should), I decided to remove the entire column. In addition I also removed the DT Red Tag column as well. The goal of creating the list of 0 to 100+ merit achievers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4104852.msg38101766#msg38101766) is to set an example for the new members to encourage them that it's not impossible to rank up from 0 merit.

---

Look mate, I told you that I am not accusing them not even the person who awarded them merit. I am only questioning the way the person gave them merits. Why are you and you guys in Russian Section dragging it into you lot?

I do not know anyone in this forum, I do not know who is honest or who is dishonest, I do not have any intention to ruin anyone's reputation either. When I see something is not looking regular then I question?

I am not setting up anyone for anything what the hack you are talking about? Don't justify my personality from my activities in a forum. You don't know me in person.

About doing things for multi-accounts - What makes you think that I specialize in finding multi-accounts or I should do something about them? In the forum it's allowed to have ALTs by the way.

@Jet Cash you are full of wisdom mate, no doubt about it after reading some of the topics in FtT. My connection was down since last night led me this late reply.

I saw this topic for the first time and I want to express my gratitude to the author, because without knowledge and experience it is not easy to find the necessary information on the forum and get acquainted with such worthy people.

hello!
I DO IT ;D 0 to 100+ merit achieved 8)
add me in you table

Congratulations for your achievement. Just added you.


@rucoinmaster Thank you for your kind words. Hope some day you can make it too.

hi, mdayonliner!
I do it  0 to 100+ merit achieved
My specialty is Free TwitterAudit + Fake-List (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2902938.msg29851415#msg29851415)

Done with the provided information.
Thanks for confirming

reserved

_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} This is an on going list. If you are a 10 to 100 and plus merit achievers then please let me know I will add you in the list.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} The list is alphabetically sorted.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} Feel free to write me if you find any error in the list


¹_{In my opinion, if you have better idea about the individuals specialty please let me know.}
²_{The user or the community confirmed the achievement.}

reserved

_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} This is an on going list. If you are a 100 to 250 and plus merit achievers then please let me know I will add you in the list.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} The list is alphabetically sorted.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} Feel free to write me if you find any error in the list


¹_{In my opinion, if you have better idea about the individuals specialty please let me know.}
²_{The user or the community confirmed the achievement.}

reserved

_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} This is an on going list. If you are a 250 to 500 and plus merit achievers then please let me know I will add you in the list.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} The list is alphabetically sorted.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} Feel free to write me if you find any error in the list


¹_{In my opinion, if you have better idea about the individuals specialty please let me know.}
²_{The user or the community confirmed the achievement.}

reserved

_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} This is an on going list. If you are a 500 to 1000 and plus merit achievers then please let me know I will add you in the list.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} The list is alphabetically sorted.
_{https://i.imgur.com/iq0PiNI.png} Feel free to write me if you find any error in the list


¹_{In my opinion, if you have better idea about the individuals specialty please let me know.}
²_{The user or the community confirmed the achievement.}

I'm still working on these lists :P I'll get you a complete overview once I have the data.

Hey mate, no problem. I am just getting the format ready. Let me know once you done.

Congratulations. Nice list and effort. Copper member included?

Bro, why you need "specialty" column? IMO you don't need a specialty to rank up. If so, I bet many members who rank before merit introduced will have no specialty. Maybe we just need the list. Whether it's legit or not, it's not our decision to make.

~ Just my two satoshis ~

I am not focusing on membership, I am focusing on initial merit airdrop to next decent regular ranking up. Like:
0 to 100 and plus
10 to 100 and plus etc.

---

I am much focused on the events that are happening after the merit system has been introduced.

I think you fix it ;)

P.S. I have a talent for noticing things that others don't notice :D

This is a good work. I dont even know why there are so many salty people over a good work. Yes, you are posting a lot about merit, and yes it may look like you are sucking higher member a lot, but what you did requires a lot of work and i myself really like this kind of work. Infographic, facts, stats about merit is a great work and require a lot of time to finish, so i dont mind if people are getting merit from it. Those salty people just prove us that (some) human is just a selfish and jealous creature over people who have done better than them, while they think they are better than those who are better.

By the way, is there a list from 100 to 500? I kinda lost on the thread hehe.
Oh, i found the 100-250 list, maybe you can add me on that list.

And i forgot the most important thing, congrats mdayonliner, way to go to 250 !!!

It would be cool if you would be able to create a list of people who have achieved more merit than they have posted. That would probably be a good indicator of very good posters.

I'm not sure if you would want to look at it since the merit system has been brought in to prevent misleading stats.

The problem to creating that list is that, to be fair, you would need to use a common starting date for the post count (avoid that more senior members have all their post history considered from way back). You could use the 24th/25th of January 2018 a a baseline, but it has two correlated issues:

- you would have to discard the count on posts prior to the baseline. There are not that many prior to Merit Kickoff that have been merited, so it would not be that bad (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4181253.msg38299950#msg38299950 section 5).

- but the issue is being able to get every merited person’s post count from that baseline date. The profile post count is from date of creation, so getting this specific element of data would be hellish..

I only need 3,000+ merits to get on that list. :)

Ok I think I understand what you are trying to say. Getting each individuals post count from eg 21st of feb to now would be very resource heavy/difficult.

It's probably not worth the effort anyway as I don't think there's enough people earning over their post counts to justify that.

I already did that for Merit vs Activity:
(click (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3078328.msg38841541#msg38841541) for the full list)

Most accounts on the list are there because of other reasons than just good posts.

It took me one minute to adjust it to Merit vs Posts, but most of my profile-data is a week older than my Merit data now.
It'll nicely show the users who deleted most or all of their posts, and some Newbies with only a few high profile posts. And some people with 1337 posts are counted as zero in my script :P (if I ever download all profiles again, I'll fix this). Ignoring the leet, Satoshi is #1!
Downloading 22189 profiles takes about 8 hours. I'll stick to this approximation:

     1. 1000 (=1000-leet): 50cent_rapper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205277)
     2. 690 (=1265-575): satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)
     3. 468 (=503-35): deadsea33 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106374)
     4. 440 (=501-61): pafu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25731)
     5. 354 (=596-242): GameKyuubi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26945)
     6. 254 (=260-6): AztekPhoenix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841833)
     7. 254 (=254-leet): Neuromancer1911 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920748)
     8. 224 (=1002-778): CoinDiver (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=60653)
     9. 218 (=1002-784): SuperClam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321133)
    10. 216 (=1050-834): casinocoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=181084)
    11. 215 (=1017-802): lavajumper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=94331)
    12. 215 (=1001-786): DanielBTC (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64847)
    13. 206 (=1001-795): lukyforvar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102378)
    14. 203 (=1000-797): M0ndialu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78383)
    15. 202 (=1009-807): punkrock (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174939)
    16. 200 (=1004-804): C10H15N (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=69553)
    17. 200 (=1000-800): mrbodz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=409063)
    18. 198 (=1004-806): No_2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=82566)
    19. 197 (=1001-804): Mota (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120727)
    20. 195 (=1001-806): rockethead (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=294420)
    21. 194 (=1004-810): CosaNostra (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=161207)
    22. 194 (=1002-808): Relaxedsense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253843)
    23. 189 (=1001-812): The Frisian (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=365501)
    24. 185 (=1001-816): snortex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=246704)
    25. 183 (=1001-818): jtoomim (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=172727)
    26. 177 (=1001-824): MaoChao (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=410541)
    27. 176 (=1000-824): tkon3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=231072)
    28. 172 (=808-636): romanornr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=225292)
    29. 171 (=1002-831): noise23 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=223359)
    30. 170 (=1026-856): arulbero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=170072)
    31. 168 (=1054-886): VonSpass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=219067)
    32. 155 (=1005-850): EbonHawk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=163494)
    33. 151 (=1002-851): nicehash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=362449)
    34. 151 (=1000-849): leps (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=451278)
    35. 151 (=1000-849): varanvaran (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=422859)
    36. 150 (=1004-854): keystroke (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4248)
    37. 146 (=1016-870): CryptoImperator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=316604)
    38. 145 (=454-309): explorder (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1108331)
    39. 142 (=1009-867): hodlcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=311045)
    40. 141 (=1001-860): Glucose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=376375)
    41. 140 (=1053-913): mmm01 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263733)
    42. 139 (=1006-867): xcbtrader (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263267)
    43. 137 (=1002-865): bitcasino.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=207035)
    44. 136 (=1006-870): fitraok09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352642)
    45. 133 (=1001-868): filharvey (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=13672)
    46. 131 (=1002-871): SmokeTooMuch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=13)
    47. 129 (=1000-871): tiozes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=114967)
    48. 125 (=1001-876): glub0x (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=39111)
    49. 125 (=1001-876): maildir (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=354710)
    50. 122 (=1001-879): tonyq (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=97278)
    51. 121 (=1001-880): JuanHungLo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=166737)
    52. 120 (=1001-881): George5 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=94260)
    53. 115 (=1002-887): Mapuo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64396)
    54. 115 (=1000-885): AzzAz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=112887)
    55. 109 (=109-leet): petushka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1129603)
    56. 107 (=1050-943): Lasergun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=89317)
    57. 107 (=1021-914): NattyLiteCoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=265513)
    58. 105 (=105-0): nemya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169572)
    59. 104 (=1004-900): raetsch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=531760)
    60. 103 (=1001-898): Mad_Max (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=103911)
    61. 101 (=1000-899): Undermood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=369443)
    62. 101 (=1000-899): vladimirushev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=171857)
    63. 100 (=101-1): I_LOVE_PIVX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978670)
    64. 96 (=1000-904): pcfli (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253683)
    65. 94 (=1003-909): SgtMoth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=36319)
    66. 93 (=1000-907): chryspano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=87190)
    67. 90 (=250-160): asicprofit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=446503)
    68. 90 (=1073-983): Micio (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=115423)
    69. 90 (=1027-937): Dunkelheit667 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106872)
    70. 88 (=100-12): lucky009 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=957841)
    71. 87 (=1008-921): BG4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=74263)
    72. 87 (=1001-914): BldSwtTrs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=99805)
    73. 87 (=1000-913): Anarchy101 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=533987)
    74. 87 (=1000-913): NaXxow (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=51285)
    75. 85 (=119-34): Dr.Mann (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806854)
    76. 85 (=1000-915): k0er (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=422621)
    77. 84 (=1009-925): IGHOR (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=116332)
    78. 84 (=1002-918): TracerX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106965)
    79. 84 (=1001-917): lestherat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=400415)
    80. 83 (=1003-920): stevegee58 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=48895)
    81. 82 (=1001-919): Vin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=330421)
    82. 81 (=1006-925): rivoke (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=380730)
    83. 78 (=103-25): GiGa# (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=258817)
    84. 78 (=1013-935): wosch76 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=377795)
    85. 77 (=77-0): cheddur_announce (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339582)
    86. 76 (=1001-925): mitzie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=210680)
    87. 75 (=1003-928): minorman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44387)
    88. 75 (=1000-925): buygazprom (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=104151)
    89. 73 (=1000-927): escalicha (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102758)
    90. 72 (=1019-947): yogi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=42027)
    91. 72 (=1003-931): CryptoCanary (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332653)
    92. 71 (=270-199): laszlo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=143)
    93. 71 (=1005-934): maikelblogo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=115900)
    94. 70 (=1023-953): Xprim777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=383795)
    95. 70 (=1000-930): bluedeep (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=236814)
    96. 69 (=78-9): Battlestar_Coin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1792612)
    97. 67 (=1014-947): otrkid70 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=183495)
    98. 67 (=1007-940): silverfuture (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44611)
    99. 67 (=1000-933): SwingFirst (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=147307)
   100. 66 (=1005-939): Qoheleth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=47100)
   101. 64 (=1025-961): SpAcEDeViL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=134549)
   102. 64 (=1001-937): remotemass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=68924)
   103. 64 (=1001-937): sanbashiyi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=201906)
   104. 63 (=1002-939): kpitti (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=257707)
   105. 63 (=1000-937): GrinZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188159)
   106. 62 (=1055-993): youngwebs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=255902)
   107. 61 (=1048-987): teramit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=158960)
   108. 61 (=1001-940): Bitware (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=56297)
   109. 61 (=1001-940): cesmak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131257)
   110. 60 (=1009-949): jiggytom (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=361695)
   111. 58 (=1000-942): bennana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=380642)
   112. 57 (=551-494): cryptimus prime (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=757113)
   113. 56 (=1000-944): hurricandave (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=216987)
   114. 55 (=1003-948): elbill (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=73326)
   115. 53 (=533-480): RichDaniel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=886352)
   116. 53 (=305-252): mfort312 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=182284)
   117. 53 (=1001-948): principiante (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=142966)
   118. 52 (=1018-966): pinkman12345 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=288496)
   119. 52 (=1001-949): generalt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=354479)
   120. 51 (=55-4): unknownids (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893276)
   121. 50 (=1003-953): coingamblingreviews (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=339362)
   122. 50 (=1001-951): Salmen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=386072)
   123. 49 (=1059-1010): nopedope89 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=231477)
   124. 48 (=1006-958): IncludeBeer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=297304)
   125. 48 (=1000-952): Micky25 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107745)
   126. 46 (=1000-954): pickupcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=482905)
   127. 45 (=1018-973): wetsuit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154142)
   128. 43 (=52-9): Wingzcrypto2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1951507)
   129. 43 (=262-219): frodocooper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988740)
   130. 43 (=1055-1012): bcmine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=258048)
   131. 43 (=1050-1007): mistercashking (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=368981)
   132. 40 (=50-10): AllarDallar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1540245)
   133. 40 (=1001-961): juicejoyce (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=114902)
   134. 38 (=1001-963): o_solo_miner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=395806)
   135. 37 (=51-14): dr_ropata (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=975217)
   136. 37 (=41-4): aledesousa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982879)
   137. 37 (=1001-964): GGUL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135010)
   138. 35 (=50-15): analema (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1091488)
   139. 35 (=349-314): Hal (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2436)
   140. 35 (=1004-969): TheLittleDuke (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=47842)
   141. 33 (=33-0): Nasakioto_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=899064)
   142. 32 (=46-14): Annon001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1958933)
   143. 32 (=200-168): BitPanda.com (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=903452)
   144. 32 (=1000-968): Dotto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300791)
   145. 30 (=1013-983): brutale2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151278)
   146. 30 (=1003-973): Eliovp (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=236770)
   147. 30 (=1000-970): boestin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=206140)
   148. 29 (=43-14): Seapork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1869711)
   149. 28 (=51-23): brianmct (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1969023)
   150. 28 (=502-474): jimmyk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102470)
   151. 27 (=1001-974): pao_de_lo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=196268)
   152. 26 (=85-59): gallisiardi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1432750)
   153. 26 (=518-492): Mr Felt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=388468)
   154. 26 (=105-79): Technor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1134109)
   155. 26 (=1001-975): ofeefee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106284)
   156. 26 (=100-74): crazyer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1019752)
   157. 25 (=514-489): Tehfiend (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=84447)
   158. 25 (=1001-976): domob (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88236)
   159. 24 (=1001-977): Timo Y (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=271)
   160. 24 (=100-76): musbeto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1009479)
   161. 23 (=24-1): k453345 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1777416)
   162. 22 (=37-15): Corrosive (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2005913)
   163. 22 (=162-140): AverageGlabella (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=392646)
   164. 20 (=50-30): _church (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1130764)
   165. 19 (=54-35): btcnerdie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289275)
   166. 19 (=20-1): adhd_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003863)
   167. 19 (=20-1): Two-faced (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852133)
   168. 19 (=1050-1031): MemoryDealers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10310)
   169. 19 (=1007-988): A-Bolt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=33631)
   170. 18 (=510-492): BigWait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=314703)
   171. 18 (=50-32): Arczimedes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366535)
   172. 18 (=20-2): hasu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=996103)
   173. 18 (=20-2): Bitcze (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1814042)
   174. 18 (=20-2): davidrus123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1299165)
   175. 17 (=328-311): Twinscoin2017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1093001)
   176. 17 (=27-10): GrowGuildD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1139392)
   177. 17 (=1001-984): oddwh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119702)
   178. 16 (=502-486): crymzyn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=179654)
   179. 16 (=20-4): Alundari (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1069823)
   180. 16 (=18-2): takeapart (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1830600)
   181. 16 (=18-2): VashStampede (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1803937)
   182. 16 (=1007-991): snipie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=550315)
   183. 15 (=69-54): monero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=319826)
   184. 15 (=578-563): pitipawn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1076869)
   185. 14 (=502-488): Gws24 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101842)
   186. 14 (=500-486): miztaziggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31422)
   187. 14 (=40-26): hodl_on (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1355100)
   188. 14 (=20-6): avatar_gr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1770901)
   189. 14 (=19-5): idrisi33 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1370845)
   190. 14 (=1000-986): jpoker272727 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=36641)
   191. 13 (=503-490): Cdecker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49)
   192. 13 (=500-487): vortex1878 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=83868)
   193. 13 (=23-10): Lastcrazywizard (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1764920)
   194. 13 (=21-8): Justin-Checqit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1633248)
   195. 13 (=1003-990): drm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=183554)
   196. 13 (=1002-989): smracer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=48727)
   197. 13 (=1002-989): idev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1626)
   198. 12 (=50-38): Arysum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1961874)
   199. 12 (=48-36): swolf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1121114)
   200. 12 (=34-22): Jo11yRoger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1315948)
   201. 12 (=17-5): HunterV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1405345)
   202. 12 (=1000-988): Pipesnake (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18700)
   203. 11 (=50-39): EvolveMarkets (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=931259)
   204. 11 (=31-20): cheatoshin0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1402928)
   205. 11 (=20-9): CipherUno (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1973896)
   206. 11 (=16-5): zcroc1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000093)
   207. 11 (=15-4): unicornflex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197256)
   208. 11 (=14-3): Georgiano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1360148)
   209. 10 (=250-240): Delicieuxz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64187)
   210. 10 (=250-240): EnricoS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401319)
   211. 10 (=250-240): tommy163 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149306)
   212. 10 (=15-5): Delitr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2084188)
   213. 10 (=13-3): farzan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=540101)
   214. 10 (=11-1): icoinspector (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1166168)
   215. 10 (=10-0): LST123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2081207)
   216. 10 (=10-0): Wortutat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1078748)
   217. 9 (=501-492): rage1337 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=83616)
   218. 9 (=13-4): nanze (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1707239)
   219. 9 (=12-3): ChatBotv2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1191052)
   220. 9 (=11-2): bitrails (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1881552)
   221. 9 (=10-1): Peggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352695)
   222. 9 (=10-1): SMFSMF5555 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806293)
   223. 8 (=60-52): CornHub (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1163497)
   224. 8 (=271-263): dolores13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=868552)
   225. 8 (=251-243): SlyWax (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137164)
   226. 8 (=250-242): wawan99 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=888110)
   227. 8 (=250-242): CyanFox (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=659882)
   228. 8 (=250-242): angryswamp (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553242)
   229. 8 (=250-242): ComponY (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=511371)
   230. 8 (=20-12): itsjustdutch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1271403)
   231. 8 (=20-12): eBunny6 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1027455)
   232. 8 (=10-2): bad3412 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=915076)
   233. 8 (=10-2): mRAC (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1868632)
   234. 8 (=10-2): flickernetwork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795459)
   235. 8 (=10-2): Camille_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1671164)
   236. 8 (=10-2): PZJ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1165898)
   237. 8 (=10-2): sjmueller56 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109709)
   238. 7 (=8-1): allahabadialt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000000)
   239. 7 (=60-53): Steepdev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=769913)
   240. 7 (=254-247): manchester93 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359843)
   241. 7 (=250-243): soros017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881307)
   242. 7 (=250-243): rubiprojects (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=242419)
   243. 7 (=150-143): kaptkrunch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=952175)
   244. 7 (=136-129): ammo121810 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1059990)
   245. 7 (=11-4): crypflash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1760392)
   246. 7 (=11-4): Paedy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1747056)
   247. 7 (=1001-994): visdude (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=99859)
   248. 7 (=1000-993): matveevka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=315884)
   249. 7 (=10-3): cryptolous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1908180)
   250. 7 (=10-3): wheresthecurve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1842139)
   251. 7 (=10-3): pasecka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1732363)
   252. 7 (=10-3): Fergun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109683)
   253. 6 (=7-1): videotek (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1912055)
   254. 6 (=7-1): publicjud1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1430881)
   255. 6 (=6-0): shadow87 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1833105)
   256. 6 (=6-0): Beforged09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1378316)
   257. 6 (=23-17): Punqtured (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1312360)
   258. 6 (=1004-998): elianite (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=231497)
   259. 6 (=10-4): B!tco!n$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1940492)
   260. 6 (=10-4): tom_cardano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180888)
   261. 5 (=9-4): seethernac (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2013826)
   262. 5 (=7-2): reditacute (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2046869)
   263. 5 (=7-2): CryptoSangria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2015731)
   264. 5 (=5-0): kryptous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1730692)
   265. 5 (=5-0): Yame (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1704288)
   266. 5 (=5-0): jern_18 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1535444)
   267. 5 (=264-259): Trolololo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88345)
   268. 5 (=250-245): SacriFries11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=989450)
   269. 5 (=250-245): Geekphazm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825305)
   270. 5 (=20-15): TxProject (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033506)
   271. 5 (=20-15): XMR2020 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1270551)
   272. 5 (=145-140): Joe-Niner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1147769)
   273. 5 (=1000-995): Ejarwan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=301452)
   274. 5 (=10-5): Bitlinguist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2040202)
   275. 5 (=10-5): BlueFrontiers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1837486)
   276. 4 (=6-2): tgboy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000084)
   277. 4 (=6-2): TheCryptoguyX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1987032)
   278. 4 (=6-2): chain_architect (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825513)
   279. 4 (=501-497): Thingamajig (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195703)
   280. 4 (=5-1): glueckspilz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2076902)
   281. 4 (=5-1): hardforks.com (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2069579)
   282. 4 (=5-1): kryptoholik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1894806)
   283. 4 (=5-1): MetropolisHastings12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1794041)
   284. 4 (=4-0): pepenghindot (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1575667)
   285. 4 (=252-248): fearisfearless (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=178850)
   286. 4 (=250-246): montaga (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520175)
   287. 4 (=250-246): naglas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=217548)
   288. 4 (=150-146): Jacky_Chan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=318772)
   289. 4 (=15-11): FarmBuster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1819182)
   290. 4 (=1197-1193): ibminer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=84866)
   291. 4 (=117-113): kaar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1439008)
   292. 4 (=1003-999): TheTribesman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=168257)
   293. 4 (=10-6): ATRD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1854909)
   294. 4 (=10-6): PetroleumDEV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1758054)
   295. 3 (=8-5): henryfondafan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1995745)
   296. 3 (=7-4): orangepeel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1521827)
   297. 3 (=507-504): mr.coinzy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=204766)
   298. 3 (=5-2): CryptoMaps (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1943473)
   299. 3 (=5-2): CryptoCapn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1884501)
   300. 3 (=5-2): Tobi97l (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1708877)
   301. 3 (=4-1): Cryptobitminer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1755905)
   302. 3 (=4-1): Diogenes26 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1539204)
   303. 3 (=3-0): anonymous219 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1807819)
   304. 3 (=3-0): Olga Artemova (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1665788)
   305. 3 (=22-19): costis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=963270)
   306. 3 (=1001-998): mirny (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72302)
   307. 3 (=10-7): Msharim (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1648189)
   308. 2 (=77-75): Dropper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1091123)
   309. 2 (=6-4): NetteBlockchainkette (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1840418)
   310. 2 (=5-3): danialaez (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1917062)
   311. 2 (=5-3): sukaslayer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1908705)
   312. 2 (=5-3): IUsedToOwn10000Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1774899)
   313. 2 (=4-2): borsa yorumcusu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2077721)
   314. 2 (=4-2): Atalol (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1765499)
   315. 2 (=3-1): MtGotts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1928480)
   316. 2 (=3-1): techtipspt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1901976)
   317. 2 (=3-1): Profit-Calendar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1891853)
   318. 2 (=3-1): m0rph3us7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1769919)
   319. 2 (=3-1): temp1024 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1737333)
   320. 2 (=3-1): Jachiva (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1614794)
   321. 2 (=3-1): isimmisimyok (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1602816)
   322. 2 (=251-249): Atheros (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18765)
   323. 2 (=250-248): dragonares (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=713360)
   324. 2 (=250-248): psyx80 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556495)
   325. 2 (=250-248): autada (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=368629)
   326. 2 (=22-20): unabomber (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1644225)
   327. 2 (=2-0): Davidbugs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978309)
   328. 2 (=2-0): humpolec9974 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003834)
   329. 2 (=2-0): inpersuppti (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1979059)
   330. 2 (=2-0): laudaowlcatztman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1953386)
   331. 2 (=2-0): Richarddd2088 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1899294)
   332. 2 (=2-0): peacefuleden (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1881180)
   333. 2 (=2-0): quangai2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1757098)
   334. 2 (=2-0): tanyhed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1695049)
   335. 2 (=2-0): damecha3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1669483)
   336. 2 (=2-0): Sitebase (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1584390)
   337. 2 (=2-0): bit1070msi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1164282)
   338. 2 (=2-0): BitcoinRhapsody (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1050903)
   339. 2 (=2-0): Lexi27 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1031391)
   340. 2 (=1000-998): Tony116 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=74846)
   341. 2 (=10-8): AStephen2011 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2318)
   342. 2 (=10-8): Robert Baker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1976455)
   343. 2 (=10-8): jamesburrell2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1193093)
   344. 2 (=10-8): coroner4300 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1182736)
   345. 1 (=7-6): dmartin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1325639)
   346. 1 (=6-5): Obriennathaniel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1796209)
   347. 1 (=4-3): maximoose5000 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1984796)
   348. 1 (=4-3): DeadManHope (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1199961)
   349. 1 (=3-2): mohamed reda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806787)
   350. 1 (=3-2): Sylv 7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806239)
   351. 1 (=3-2): olongtea (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1732904)
   352. 1 (=3-2): declan- (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1191508)
   353. 1 (=283-282): TheBrute (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=664715)
   354. 1 (=258-257): Edgemaster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=912636)
   355. 1 (=250-249): febriyana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=348912)
   356. 1 (=250-249): Rora (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=117662)
   357. 1 (=2-1): ranacond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=953708)
   358. 1 (=2-1): 1pool Ltd. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2062862)
   359. 1 (=2-1): ProximaX.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2022545)
   360. 1 (=2-1): LordPyro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1937529)
   361. 1 (=2-1): EtherAndy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1813270)
   362. 1 (=2-1): abihey269 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1798870)
   363. 1 (=2-1): Red Right Hand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795671)
   364. 1 (=2-1): rrgarcia555 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795048)
   365. 1 (=2-1): nicholashscott (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1791021)
   366. 1 (=2-1): xjamasterx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1215555)
   367. 1 (=1010-1009): funkenstein (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=388672)
   368. 1 (=1000-999): manfred (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=80952)
   369. 1 (=10-9): juvo_3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852357)
   370. 1 (=10-9): JAA37 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1826408)
   371. 1 (=10-9): xwtfx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109049)
   372. 1 (=1-0): HemlockO (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976247)
   373. 1 (=1-0): kumarperiasamy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879561)
   374. 1 (=1-0): Mai2001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2038983)
   375. 1 (=1-0): Brittany35a (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000417)
   376. 1 (=1-0): naicalsela (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1988208)
   377. 1 (=1-0): CryptoBappy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1977854)
   378. 1 (=1-0): Oureilidis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1889426)
   379. 1 (=1-0): John.1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1882514)
   380. 1 (=1-0): jimshui (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1876950)
   381. 1 (=1-0): Satania (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1872750)
   382. 1 (=1-0): tomcrypto001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1831153)
   383. 1 (=1-0): schnuber2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1815417)
   384. 1 (=1-0): bal53 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1805827)
   385. 1 (=1-0): adirozaq8 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1801153)
   386. 1 (=1-0): bittrdr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1780535)
   387. 1 (=1-0): Emilysusa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1778904)
   388. 1 (=1-0): Charlesgodfery (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1772193)
   389. 1 (=1-0): Vianstandyy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1752554)
   390. 1 (=1-0): sidhu44 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1752159)
   391. 1 (=1-0): Jandariea (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1731463)
   392. 1 (=1-0): tiwookie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1714203)
   393. 1 (=1-0): Jack Letterby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1707194)
   394. 1 (=1-0): capitanamequira (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1689260)
   395. 1 (=1-0): MandyHere (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1671670)
   396. 1 (=1-0): Crypto G (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1670585)
   397. 1 (=1-0): kenzo11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1669253)
   398. 1 (=1-0): doktor1509 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1583550)
   399. 1 (=1-0): ikrarnusa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1473458)
   400. 1 (=1-0): axelcris09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1340739)
   401. 1 (=1-0): chowda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1327233)
   402. 1 (=1-0): eljay123qq (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1304257)
   403. 1 (=1-0): hoanbeon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1264502)
   404. 1 (=1-0): iYasuo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006453)

If I ignore Legendary and Hero Members (the 1000 Merit airdrop messes up the data), I get this shorter list. Many of the accounts with zero posts are probably nuked:

     1. 690 (=1265-575): satoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3)
     2. 468 (=503-35): deadsea33 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106374)
     3. 440 (=501-61): pafu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=25731)
     4. 354 (=596-242): GameKyuubi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26945)
     5. 254 (=260-6): AztekPhoenix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841833)
     6. 145 (=454-309): explorder (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1108331)
     7. 105 (=105-0): nemya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169572)
     8. 100 (=101-1): I_LOVE_PIVX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978670)
     9. 90 (=250-160): asicprofit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=446503)
    10. 88 (=100-12): lucky009 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=957841)
    11. 85 (=119-34): Dr.Mann (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806854)
    12. 78 (=103-25): GiGa# (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=258817)
    13. 77 (=77-0): cheddur_announce (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339582)
    14. 76 (=1001-925): mitzie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=210680)
    15. 71 (=270-199): laszlo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=143)
    16. 69 (=78-9): Battlestar_Coin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1792612)
    17. 53 (=305-252): mfort312 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=182284)
    18. 51 (=55-4): unknownids (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893276)
    19. 43 (=52-9): Wingzcrypto2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1951507)
    20. 43 (=262-219): frodocooper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988740)
    21. 40 (=50-10): AllarDallar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1540245)
    22. 37 (=51-14): dr_ropata (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=975217)
    23. 37 (=41-4): aledesousa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982879)
    24. 35 (=50-15): analema (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1091488)
    25. 35 (=349-314): Hal (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2436)
    26. 33 (=33-0): Nasakioto_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=899064)
    27. 32 (=46-14): Annon001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1958933)
    28. 32 (=200-168): BitPanda.com (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=903452)
    29. 29 (=43-14): Seapork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1869711)
    30. 28 (=51-23): brianmct (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1969023)
    31. 28 (=502-474): jimmyk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=102470)
    32. 26 (=85-59): gallisiardi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1432750)
    33. 26 (=105-79): Technor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1134109)
    34. 26 (=100-74): crazyer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1019752)
    35. 24 (=100-76): musbeto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1009479)
    36. 23 (=24-1): k453345 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1777416)
    37. 22 (=37-15): Corrosive (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2005913)
    38. 22 (=162-140): AverageGlabella (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=392646)
    39. 20 (=50-30): _church (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1130764)
    40. 19 (=54-35): btcnerdie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289275)
    41. 19 (=20-1): adhd_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003863)
    42. 19 (=20-1): Two-faced (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852133)
    43. 19 (=1050-1031): MemoryDealers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=10310)
    44. 18 (=50-32): Arczimedes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366535)
    45. 18 (=20-2): hasu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=996103)
    46. 18 (=20-2): Bitcze (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1814042)
    47. 18 (=20-2): davidrus123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1299165)
    48. 17 (=328-311): Twinscoin2017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1093001)
    49. 17 (=27-10): GrowGuildD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1139392)
    50. 16 (=20-4): Alundari (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1069823)
    51. 16 (=18-2): takeapart (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1830600)
    52. 16 (=18-2): VashStampede (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1803937)
    53. 15 (=69-54): monero (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=319826)
    54. 15 (=578-563): pitipawn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1076869)
    55. 14 (=40-26): hodl_on (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1355100)
    56. 14 (=20-6): avatar_gr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1770901)
    57. 14 (=19-5): idrisi33 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1370845)
    58. 13 (=23-10): Lastcrazywizard (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1764920)
    59. 13 (=21-8): Justin-Checqit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1633248)
    60. 13 (=1002-989): smracer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=48727)
    61. 12 (=50-38): Arysum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1961874)
    62. 12 (=48-36): swolf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1121114)
    63. 12 (=34-22): Jo11yRoger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1315948)
    64. 12 (=17-5): HunterV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1405345)
    65. 11 (=50-39): EvolveMarkets (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=931259)
    66. 11 (=31-20): cheatoshin0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1402928)
    67. 11 (=20-9): CipherUno (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1973896)
    68. 11 (=16-5): zcroc1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000093)
    69. 11 (=15-4): unicornflex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=197256)
    70. 11 (=14-3): Georgiano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1360148)
    71. 10 (=250-240): Delicieuxz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64187)
    72. 10 (=250-240): EnricoS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401319)
    73. 10 (=250-240): tommy163 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149306)
    74. 10 (=15-5): Delitr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2084188)
    75. 10 (=13-3): farzan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=540101)
    76. 10 (=11-1): icoinspector (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1166168)
    77. 10 (=10-0): LST123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2081207)
    78. 10 (=10-0): Wortutat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1078748)
    79. 9 (=13-4): nanze (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1707239)
    80. 9 (=12-3): ChatBotv2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1191052)
    81. 9 (=11-2): bitrails (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1881552)
    82. 9 (=10-1): Peggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=352695)
    83. 9 (=10-1): SMFSMF5555 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806293)
    84. 8 (=60-52): CornHub (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1163497)
    85. 8 (=271-263): dolores13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=868552)
    86. 8 (=251-243): SlyWax (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=137164)
    87. 8 (=250-242): wawan99 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=888110)
    88. 8 (=250-242): CyanFox (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=659882)
    89. 8 (=250-242): angryswamp (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553242)
    90. 8 (=250-242): ComponY (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=511371)
    91. 8 (=20-12): itsjustdutch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1271403)
    92. 8 (=20-12): eBunny6 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1027455)
    93. 8 (=10-2): bad3412 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=915076)
    94. 8 (=10-2): mRAC (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1868632)
    95. 8 (=10-2): flickernetwork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795459)
    96. 8 (=10-2): Camille_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1671164)
    97. 8 (=10-2): PZJ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1165898)
    98. 8 (=10-2): sjmueller56 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109709)
    99. 7 (=8-1): allahabadialt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000000)
   100. 7 (=60-53): Steepdev (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=769913)
   101. 7 (=254-247): manchester93 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359843)
   102. 7 (=250-243): soros017 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881307)
   103. 7 (=250-243): rubiprojects (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=242419)
   104. 7 (=150-143): kaptkrunch (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=952175)
   105. 7 (=136-129): ammo121810 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1059990)
   106. 7 (=11-4): crypflash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1760392)
   107. 7 (=11-4): Paedy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1747056)
   108. 7 (=10-3): cryptolous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1908180)
   109. 7 (=10-3): wheresthecurve (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1842139)
   110. 7 (=10-3): pasecka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1732363)
   111. 7 (=10-3): Fergun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109683)
   112. 6 (=7-1): videotek (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1912055)
   113. 6 (=7-1): publicjud1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1430881)
   114. 6 (=6-0): shadow87 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1833105)
   115. 6 (=6-0): Beforged09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1378316)
   116. 6 (=23-17): Punqtured (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1312360)
   117. 6 (=10-4): B!tco!n$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1940492)
   118. 6 (=10-4): tom_cardano (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1180888)
   119. 5 (=9-4): seethernac (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2013826)
   120. 5 (=7-2): reditacute (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2046869)
   121. 5 (=7-2): CryptoSangria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2015731)
   122. 5 (=5-0): kryptous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1730692)
   123. 5 (=5-0): Yame (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1704288)
   124. 5 (=5-0): jern_18 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1535444)
   125. 5 (=264-259): Trolololo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88345)
   126. 5 (=250-245): SacriFries11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=989450)
   127. 5 (=250-245): Geekphazm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825305)
   128. 5 (=20-15): TxProject (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033506)
   129. 5 (=20-15): XMR2020 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1270551)
   130. 5 (=145-140): Joe-Niner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1147769)
   131. 5 (=10-5): Bitlinguist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2040202)
   132. 5 (=10-5): BlueFrontiers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1837486)
   133. 4 (=6-2): tgboy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000084)
   134. 4 (=6-2): TheCryptoguyX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1987032)
   135. 4 (=6-2): chain_architect (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1825513)
   136. 4 (=5-1): glueckspilz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2076902)
   137. 4 (=5-1): hardforks.com (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2069579)
   138. 4 (=5-1): kryptoholik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1894806)
   139. 4 (=5-1): MetropolisHastings12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1794041)
   140. 4 (=4-0): pepenghindot (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1575667)
   141. 4 (=252-248): fearisfearless (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=178850)
   142. 4 (=250-246): montaga (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=520175)
   143. 4 (=250-246): naglas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=217548)
   144. 4 (=150-146): Jacky_Chan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=318772)
   145. 4 (=15-11): FarmBuster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1819182)
   146. 4 (=117-113): kaar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1439008)
   147. 4 (=10-6): ATRD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1854909)
   148. 4 (=10-6): PetroleumDEV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1758054)
   149. 3 (=8-5): henryfondafan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1995745)
   150. 3 (=7-4): orangepeel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1521827)
   151. 3 (=5-2): CryptoMaps (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1943473)
   152. 3 (=5-2): CryptoCapn (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1884501)
   153. 3 (=5-2): Tobi97l (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1708877)
   154. 3 (=4-1): Cryptobitminer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1755905)
   155. 3 (=4-1): Diogenes26 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1539204)
   156. 3 (=3-0): anonymous219 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1807819)
   157. 3 (=3-0): Olga Artemova (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1665788)
   158. 3 (=22-19): costis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=963270)
   159. 3 (=10-7): Msharim (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1648189)
   160. 2 (=77-75): Dropper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1091123)
   161. 2 (=6-4): NetteBlockchainkette (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1840418)
   162. 2 (=5-3): danialaez (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1917062)
   163. 2 (=5-3): sukaslayer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1908705)
   164. 2 (=5-3): IUsedToOwn10000Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1774899)
   165. 2 (=4-2): borsa yorumcusu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2077721)
   166. 2 (=4-2): Atalol (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1765499)
   167. 2 (=3-1): MtGotts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1928480)
   168. 2 (=3-1): techtipspt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1901976)
   169. 2 (=3-1): Profit-Calendar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1891853)
   170. 2 (=3-1): m0rph3us7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1769919)
   171. 2 (=3-1): temp1024 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1737333)
   172. 2 (=3-1): Jachiva (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1614794)
   173. 2 (=3-1): isimmisimyok (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1602816)
   174. 2 (=251-249): Atheros (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18765)
   175. 2 (=250-248): dragonares (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=713360)
   176. 2 (=250-248): psyx80 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556495)
   177. 2 (=250-248): autada (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=368629)
   178. 2 (=22-20): unabomber (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1644225)
   179. 2 (=2-0): Davidbugs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978309)
   180. 2 (=2-0): humpolec9974 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2003834)
   181. 2 (=2-0): inpersuppti (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1979059)
   182. 2 (=2-0): laudaowlcatztman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1953386)
   183. 2 (=2-0): Richarddd2088 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1899294)
   184. 2 (=2-0): peacefuleden (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1881180)
   185. 2 (=2-0): quangai2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1757098)
   186. 2 (=2-0): tanyhed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1695049)
   187. 2 (=2-0): damecha3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1669483)
   188. 2 (=2-0): Sitebase (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1584390)
   189. 2 (=2-0): bit1070msi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1164282)
   190. 2 (=2-0): BitcoinRhapsody (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1050903)
   191. 2 (=2-0): Lexi27 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1031391)
   192. 2 (=10-8): AStephen2011 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2318)
   193. 2 (=10-8): Robert Baker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1976455)
   194. 2 (=10-8): jamesburrell2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1193093)
   195. 2 (=10-8): coroner4300 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1182736)
   196. 1 (=7-6): dmartin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1325639)
   197. 1 (=6-5): Obriennathaniel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1796209)
   198. 1 (=4-3): maximoose5000 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1984796)
   199. 1 (=4-3): DeadManHope (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1199961)
   200. 1 (=3-2): mohamed reda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806787)
   201. 1 (=3-2): Sylv 7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1806239)
   202. 1 (=3-2): olongtea (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1732904)
   203. 1 (=3-2): declan- (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1191508)
   204. 1 (=283-282): TheBrute (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=664715)
   205. 1 (=258-257): Edgemaster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=912636)
   206. 1 (=250-249): febriyana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=348912)
   207. 1 (=250-249): Rora (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=117662)
   208. 1 (=2-1): ranacond (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=953708)
   209. 1 (=2-1): 1pool Ltd. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2062862)
   210. 1 (=2-1): ProximaX.io (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2022545)
   211. 1 (=2-1): LordPyro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1937529)
   212. 1 (=2-1): EtherAndy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1813270)
   213. 1 (=2-1): abihey269 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1798870)
   214. 1 (=2-1): Red Right Hand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795671)
   215. 1 (=2-1): rrgarcia555 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1795048)
   216. 1 (=2-1): nicholashscott (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1791021)
   217. 1 (=2-1): xjamasterx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1215555)
   218. 1 (=10-9): juvo_3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852357)
   219. 1 (=10-9): JAA37 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1826408)
   220. 1 (=10-9): xwtfx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109049)
   221. 1 (=1-0): HemlockO (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976247)
   222. 1 (=1-0): kumarperiasamy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879561)
   223. 1 (=1-0): Mai2001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2038983)
   224. 1 (=1-0): Brittany35a (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2000417)
   225. 1 (=1-0): naicalsela (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1988208)
   226. 1 (=1-0): CryptoBappy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1977854)
   227. 1 (=1-0): Oureilidis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1889426)
   228. 1 (=1-0): John.1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1882514)
   229. 1 (=1-0): jimshui (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1876950)
   230. 1 (=1-0): Satania (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1872750)
   231. 1 (=1-0): tomcrypto001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1831153)
   232. 1 (=1-0): schnuber2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1815417)
   233. 1 (=1-0): bal53 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1805827)
   234. 1 (=1-0): adirozaq8 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1801153)
   235. 1 (=1-0): bittrdr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1780535)
   236. 1 (=1-0): Emilysusa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1778904)
   237. 1 (=1-0): Charlesgodfery (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1772193)
   238. 1 (=1-0): Vianstandyy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1752554)
   239. 1 (=1-0): sidhu44 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1752159)
   240. 1 (=1-0): Jandariea (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1731463)
   241. 1 (=1-0): tiwookie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1714203)
   242. 1 (=1-0): Jack Letterby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1707194)
   243. 1 (=1-0): capitanamequira (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1689260)
   244. 1 (=1-0): MandyHere (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1671670)
   245. 1 (=1-0): Crypto G (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1670585)
   246. 1 (=1-0): kenzo11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1669253)
   247. 1 (=1-0): doktor1509 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1583550)
   248. 1 (=1-0): ikrarnusa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1473458)
   249. 1 (=1-0): axelcris09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1340739)
   250. 1 (=1-0): chowda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1327233)
   251. 1 (=1-0): eljay123qq (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1304257)
   252. 1 (=1-0): hoanbeon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1264502)
   253. 1 (=1-0): iYasuo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006453)

Wow when will I get even 10 merits ?God help me .This was great success for you brother to move from 0 to 100 is really great move.

When you stop posting one sentence replies on threads with hundreds, if not thousands of pages and start actually contributing.

Will be adding tomorrow and also will update this post. Too late here today. Need to crush
Added. Thanks for the confirmation. Also thank you for the wish. Yeah next is 250 LOL

I haven't really bothered about merit until read the last part of this thread. i'm on an activity of 896, and a merit of 892, and I'm having to resist it triggering my competitive instinct. :)

You've been gaining merit 3 to 4 times faster than activity, so it shouldn't take that long.

I was lucky enough to start as a 'Hero', and my posting privileges are more than enough for my needs at the moment. So I haven't been watching my merit count, other than to use it as an indication of community approval of my behaviour. Activity in the threads I start, and replies to posts that I make, are other indicators, and I try to use those to judge public opinion. Submitting posts in an attempt to gain merit seems to be counter productive at the moment. Merit is such a sensitive issue that it is probably better to focus on Bitcoin and other crypto topics.

madayonliner, these cases could also added to your 0..100 list:


Not judging the profiles, these eight cases have also gone from 0..100+ Merits.

Note: I believe that your 0..100 list contains a few cases that started from 10, but so what really.

Thanks mate. Updated. esmanthra was already in the list though.
Yeah I know there are some which are not from 0 merits. I will PM those Confirmed members to get confirmation from them. I will add them in the other list which is for 10 to 100.

Yes, I started with 10 initial merit. Idk about the others but you can move me in the appropriate list, when ready.

Done mate. Thanks.

How to participate to this project?

Our bitcointalk merits are organic. We started receiving Merits as jr member or member no so sure. If you have a great product or service you can get more merits. People feel urge to pay back.
Keep up the Merits is not the goal but result of your actions.

No, I started with 10 initial merit. The introduction merit gave me the motivation to write good posts and create useful topics. In the beginning it was easier, but now it's getting harder.

hello,

yes I can confirm that I started at 0.
because i have invested a lot of time in the forum and the whole thematics... and I am still diligently active I could already solve a few problems and also help with questions.

in my opinion, this is the only way to get to merits really continuously and reliably  :)

greetings,
Mole

p.s. sorry for my partly incomprehensible English. had to use a translation service ;D

I personally turned hugeblack (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3108981.msg32740509#msg32740509) into Sr Member and TheQuin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3199352.msg33205881#msg33205881) into Hero, so you can add them to your lists too :)
Assuming that they started as Full member and Sr Member.

Updated/added for Incognito01, mole0815, hugeblack, TheQuin.

Thanks iasenko

---

Update for esmanthra, Ekaterinat <=== confirmed through PM

---

Update: Avatar2030 <=== confirmed through PM for 10 to 100 list

I am wondering if you have more data (new members) for the 0 to 100 list? I already PMed LoyceV for the data of other lists if he have yet.

Thanks

On the  Merit Dashboard (https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/GlobalSummary), you can go to the Ranked-up Tab. From there, click on any number in the Ranked-up Summary Table and the Detail will adjust with the names. Click on and a pop-up will offer you a link to the user Bitcointalk profile. Click the number number again to erase the selection and move on to the next one.

The detail displays the current merit (last friday) and initial merit, so you can place them on the corresponding list...

Note: The Dashboard will only show those that have gone up one rank level at some point with the need of merit.

Super! I totally missed that Merit Dashboard link. Now just took time to understand it. Great work mate. Seems like I have everything now to start working for this thread.

It's still on my incomplete-list, sorry for the huge delay.

I think I have it all from DdmrDdmr's merit dashboard. Since I was sick, I could not keep up with the update so I missed to focus on his merit dashboard to see what's it all about. I will let you know if I am missing anything there. Don't worry about the delay. I am not in hurry too. I just had it in my mind earlier today to continue it since I recovered from illness completely now.