Bitcoin Forum

You claim its not on you to decide how her (you mean his) actions weigh out or not.
Funny you have no problems that exectly that group which is always the same group which is creating trouble,hate,scams etc tags thousands of people destroying all creditbility of serious crypto people who are leaving that board and letting that crap stay.

I haven't seen a single intervention from you when that group destroyed legit member just based on their so called "assumption" .
A friend of mine who is the owner of a big swedish crypto company got defamed as scammer by them just because he did not agree on their actions.
Where were you as ADMIN to forbid this kind of actions ?
Haven't been Lauda accused and proofen as guilty of extortion ?

Why is it always the same group of people who is causing that amount of trouble which made hundred of good crypto people leave that board?
You have already the whole board against them.High ranked members who stood up to fight their bad actions which resulted into a massiv
negativ trust abuse .Hero members following from 23 positiv trust to a negativ 146 trust just because they don't agree with their actions.
You make it public that you don't agree with them you get crashed.
I even saw tule trying to fight them ?What happened to him ?Did he just left the board thinking its not worth his time anymore ?I would love to support him with my real account but what would that mean?It would mean my legendary account would be also instantly destroyed by that group.So everyone is sitting silent and just watching what is happening.
I also read tules postings and calling a guy who warned and proofed scam coins and who is involved in some very successfull projects seems for me the board is out of control.I didn't saw any intervention from you to stop that.I also do not see that you have a problem that legit high involved crypto people get defamed.
You just sit silent and DO NOTHING.
THE FORUM IS TIRED OF THESE MANIPULATORS AND OF YOU JUST SITTING AND DOING NOTHING AGAINST IT.
HOW MANY MORE LEGIT PEOPLE NEED TO BE DEFAMED AND LEAVING BEFORE YOU START MOVING YOUR ASS.
These abusive people already have their own topics on Reddit,Facebook,Instagram and other crypto boards talking how bitcointalk is out of any rules.

THEYMOS I AM A LEGENADARY ON THIS BOARD AND I FUCKING NEED TO USE A SECOND ACCOUNT TO PROTECT MYSELF AGAINST THEIR NEGATIV TRUST ABUSE BECAUSE THATS WHAT THEY DO TO DESTROY SOMEBODY AND MAKE HIM SILENT.

YOU ARE JUST GIVING PERMISSION TO DO SO.
WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER LEGENDARY WHO AGREE WITH ME ON THAT TOPIC VIA CLOSED CHATS BUT WHO WILL NEVER POST IT OPENLY BEING AFRAID OF THE ABUSE THEY WOULD RECEIVE.

YOU GAVE PERMISSION TO CREATE A PLATFORM WHERE HIGH RANKED MEMBERS ARE AFRAID TO POST AGAINST THAT KNOWN GROUP AND YOU KEEP WATCHING HOW EACH DAY SOMEBODY NEW GETS DESTROYED BY THEM

YOU ARE A SHAME IN MY EYES SINCE THAT FORUM BEGAN SO GREAT AS A DECENTRALISED PLACE WHERE NOONE CAN DESTROY SOMEBODY ELSE BUT THESE CHANGED THANKS TO YOUR SILENT PERMISSION.
NEGATIV FEEDBACK IS A WEAPON FOR SILENCiNG PEOPLE AND YOU ALLOW TO USE IT MASSIVLY.

YOUR FORUM HAS NOTHING TO DO ANYMORE WITH THE PRINCIPALES IT HAD AT THE BEGINNING.
IT HAS NOW A CENTRALISED POWER WHICH TRIES TO CHANGE EVERYTHING IN THEIR OWN FAVOUR AND THINKING.


I read the thread from blaze talking with other DT members Lauda included which tule exposed where they wrote officaly that they want to force ICO projects to only accept their approved bounty members and should a project owner not be willing to agree on their terms they will
call him officaly a scammer and force him to accept their own terms.

IS THAT WHAT THE FORUM WAS GROUNDED ON ?WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU CLOSING YOUR EYES ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
THATS A CLEAR THREAT TO PROJECT OWNERS YOU TAKE OUR MEMBERS WHERE WE GET A CUT OR YOU WILL BE DEFAMED AS SCAMMERS.

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU THEYMOS NOT REACTING ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT BUT STILL KEEPING THESE PEOPLE AS MODS AND DT ?


And to the vulture waiting to discredit me because they don't like that post.
Karma is a bitch.

Let me guess... Thule?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059200.0

You forgot to include Lauda in the title.

Why are posting from this account?

If it's because you're in the penalty box for incessant trolling (only guessing,) this could be considered ban evasion, and turn your tempban into a permaban.  Don't make a shitty situation a total clusterfuck.  Take a break from the forum, I really think it'll help you put things into perspective.


I could be wrong, but I think it's cryptohunter.

If it is, then it might be worthy of a stronger ban for talking to himself.

No, I'm quite certain it's Thule. Look at punctuation spacing, paragraph structure, "negativ trust", reference to Sweden.

The only thing that doesn't match is calling himself a "LEGENADARY" [sp] (Thule is a Sr. Member) but that's expected with narcissists.

---

So Thule (I hope you don't mind me calling you that) - how's that lawsuit against Vod going?

Well, my advice to cryptohunter stands.   ;D

Your advice is dire as I have demonstrated clearly on several other occasions.

You will find many other legends are unhappy with the gang tactics on here.

Notice which swarms of people come here and accuse me with no evidence.

I have no need to post under and alt and never will.  I like to crush you all with facts and observable events over and over. What a waste doing it under and alt.

I bring evidence to substantiate my claims. You guys as per usual bring nothing.

I have no sock puppets that is for the pharmacist aka huge black woman LOL

@theymos


Aren't DT members getting indirectly Moderators when their ratings are seen by default by everyone where people ratings on the DT's are not seen ?You talk about preventing abuse by mods by switching that power to DT members ?

Some DT's members have a hundred negativ feedback of their abuse and still a single negativ trust of them is more powerfull than all these negativ trust abuse feedbacks ?
You call that abuse prevention ?
How many times has Lauda been proofen guilty and tagged negativly ?And these were real bad staff but still people watching their posts won't see it by default.But members who have been against their behavior are now market with 150 negativ trust as scammers which is being seen by default by everyone just because they didn't agree with the groups opinion?

Is it for you not a trust system abuse ?The one guy with serious accusations and proof has a good image and the guy who never scammed anyone but voiced his opinion is now seen as the biggest scammer on this board?

Something is total wrong here and if you don't see that problem here than you shouldn't be the admin here of that forum even you are the owner or at least change the name of that forum to Scammer Support Forum


Open your fucking eyes


Not just them.I know some DT members who are very unhappy too and at least 1 moderator who was activly helping one guy who has been abused by them.

Stronger ban??

Hmmm who have you been talking too pussy cat. I wonder why that would be getting discussed with you......hmmm

What about a provable liar and trust abuser?  what kind of ban would they get taking into consideration being implicated in an extortion scheme and misappropriation of escrow funds?

Why would I be getting any kind of ban.

Presentation of facts and observable events may warrant red trust by a liar and trust abuser like yourself but I will see a reason for any ban that I receive.

@cryptohunter

I really like your signature.
I will talk to my webdesigner if its possible to create signatures which will display bbcodes which will be taken from a DB.

If yes i will create one with red colour and ask everyone who has been abused by that group to add that signature to create more attention to these abusers.

The response would be surely big.

all of us legends that post anonymous against dt are ch or qs

Thanks that would be great. I am thinking of starting a union on this board. However now that theymos went against my advice of totally separating DT and Merit sources he has firmly placed DT in the hands of merit cyclers it would seem impossible for the systems to self regulate at all. All i see happening now is merit cyclers club (mostly the only ones to meet the merit threshold for the 2 key positions) will just recruit those they can be sure of support from.

A union will actually be quite effective against this group though because if we stick to posting facts and observable events demonstrating wrong doing and untrustworthy actions eventually we will eventually keep up enough pressure to force them to either abandon the board or remove any trust abuse they have conducted. This is the fairest way and the only way left open to us. If we lose our main accounts then it will be essential for friends to be asked to join whom have similar views to ourselves. Ie that every person should be treated fairly and judged on the real merit of their contributions here.

Of course we can not represent people that are proven untrustworthy but for real victims of their DT abuse we can provide support and also force these factual and observable abuses over and over until they are forced to debate the red trust and prove it is sensible and reasonable or remove it.

I know a few people who have contacted me have said they can not dare post under their real accounts because they fear that they will be destroyed. i fully understand this and do not blame you at all. Just beware you will all be accused of being me with no evidence provided at all and likely be red trusted on the mere suspicion.

I may also start a full DT listing with each member having a full facts based review of actions/non actions to factual observable events presented to them that they refuse to review or respond with a sensible response to.

This to me makes them untrustworthy also. I mean if you went to the police with factual evidence of someone breaking into your home or committing a crime and they flat out refused to view the evidence you can assume they are corrupt and complicit in the crime.

qs has no need to post with new accounts.


@cryptohunter what you think about that

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100092.new#new

Lets begin to build our own community driven trust system.

Lets fight back with creativity which every abusers fears since its unpredictable.

You really don't know QS well, do you? ::)


What's the point, it's already done? :P

I have clearly demonstrated with observable events and facts that this current system is broken and infested with

1. liars
2. racist sock puppet sig spamming greedy paid2post addicts
3. trust abusers
4. weak and complicit users who will not stand against proven abusers and liars.
5. That merit is clearly cycled and abused and that now for some reason the ones obviously cycling it are the key positions for the trust system. LOL  just check bpip for each user and then look a their fans and receiver look at their ganging up on posts and then look who included and exclude who on DT lists. It is quite ridiculous.


Now they try to bring forth some censorship if all of that is not enough to prevent relevant, on topic facts and observable events being presented in meta if it does not fit with their agenda. I see sounds legit.

there is a need for a facts based objective trust system and a union to stand against corrupt and broken system controllers.

I suggest locating and listing their abuses (clear abuses) and then we will make a list of the DT members that have demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour in clear black and white. Over time the more they abuse and we can present facts and observable instances of this abuse then we can discredit them and rightly so.

I mean not everyone knows everything that has taken place on this board.

I was not aware until someone told me recently that the pharmacist was using a sock puppet Huge Black Woman to generate racist and offensive to some trolling to spam his other sig for btc dust.  To me that is untrustworthy. To see him lecturing on trolling or racist stuff or sig spamming is completely sickening.

I mean not to mention having such a greedy person as a system controller in both systems of control for paid2post and trading is quite insulting to the board.

QS has more accounts then you have satoshis

tis is a dissapointment for me too but theymos did just dt1 exclude tman and actmyname

Seems ironic considering the^rm_os excluded me for being too loose with my tags against merit abuse.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Proof?  do you think you should bring unsubstantiated claims ? I mean as a campaign manager? That is a seriously fragile position. If QS or anyone else started to spread unsubstantiated rumours about yourself to say new projects or their investors that put you in an untrustworthy light it could reflect on their project.

I mean think of it like this... If i found out a campaign manager was later demonstrated to spread unsubstantiated claims to discredit another user who was trying to post accurate facts and observable events that demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour then that campaign could by those actions be reasoned to be untrustworthy. I mean if he pokes his nose in seemingly to defend proven liars, system abusers and even sock puppet sig spammers then that does not look good at all.

Do you have some evidence of this or just spreading this kind of stuff for fun?

I am not saying if he does or does not.

Can you present your facts here please. So that I can analyse and locate these sock puppets he is using that you know of.

I know it was mentioned many times thats why i made fun he wouldn't need based on your claims.

Also suchmoon you are a pathetic moron.
You just demanded 5 minutes ago from somebody clear proof of merit abuse where everyone can see it.
You said clearly without clear proof there is no evidence.

And here you come with your negativ feedback abuse

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.
I will ask theymos to check my account to proof i'm not him and to hold you fully accountable
for your abuse and try to defame me with false claims.

ch have more satoshis than exist accounts
me 2

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

If you are not a liar and untrustworthy perhaps you should not be supporting one ?

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.


@THEYMOS YOU DON'T CALL THIS ABUSE OF A DT MEMBER DEFAMING ME AS THULE WITHOUT PROOF ?

NOW WHAT I'M BEING TAGGED AS SCAMMER ON THIS FORUM BECAUSE OF AN ASSUMPTION WITHOUT PROOF ?
FIRST I WAS CRYPTOHUNTER NOW THULE.
WOULD I LOGIN WITH MY LEGANDARY I GUESS I WILL BE TAGGED FOR BEING AN ALT OF QS

Why are you typing so cryptically?

I don't mind it if you do wordplay. ^{($0.xx is pretty funny)}
Just wondering, though.

---

^{C o}_bⁿ_u^g_d^r_d^a_y^t_.^s

It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback for you.

On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.


That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

False statement. I have no alts here.

Again this is what you get from these system abusers.

I provide facts based proof and these bozos present some nonsense they make up with no support evidence AT ALL

Suchmoron has no clue how to debate, no clue on how to substantiate any of his bogus claims at all. He feels there is no need.

I can prove he is supporting a proven liar.

Can he prove I have any alts ?? no he can not.

He is untrustworthy the facts speak for themselves.

They will sink to any underhanded tactics to discredit those that oppose their collusion and untrustworthy behaviour. Therefore they are untrustworthy.

The same goes for DT who refuse to review and report back on facts and observable events that demonstrate untrustworthy behaviour from DT members and or merit sources.

Oh, but he said this:

Yeah, I peeked.  Last time.  This level of trolling is getting ridiculous--it's the same thing over and over, and the only people who give these morons any support are alt accounts.  It's polluting Meta and Reputation and creating more drama amidst all the inherent drama involved with the major adjustment in the trust system.  Is anyone moderating Meta?  TMAN's local rule in his last thread really ought to have been enforced instead of letting the trolls run rampant.

Fucking grow up.

Here now we observe the double standards shit posting sock puppet trolling racist the pharmacist.

He is a proven shit posting troll using racist and offensive junk to spam his other sig for btc dust but come here to lecture and spout unsubstantiated and false junk himself about supposed trolling ...whilst spamming his sig lol

What a double standards corrupt person we can clearly observe he is and very untrustworthy indeed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17808231#msg17808231

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096914.0



i would suggest visiting that thread and then reviewing the evidence before leaving a comment to relate your thoughts on the entire debacle

On a scale  of 1 to 10, how much do you love Vod?

1 being "I'm Thule"
10 being "I'm pretending I'm not Thule"

You bitch know exectly why only alts are joining that discussion as history has proofen that any legit account got instantly crashed by your scamming group


Vod is another bitch who abused the system in favour of that scamming group.
Additionaly he is a dumb person.
Do i agree with Thule ?I would love to had seen Thule given him a lesson as Vod was completly wrong and trying to defand himself with poor
scare tactics.
I'm wondering he still haven't joined that thread.
Maybe the last confrontation made him use his brain a bit.

https://www.google.com/search?q=negativ+proofen+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1

Tell us more how you "agree" with Thule.

Why answer any for a proven protector and support of a liar like suchmoon?

Lol look at him providing sensible discussion here NOT. As always his posts are mostly low functioning drivel or net negative caustic junk that seeks to protect and enable the status quo of system abusers both merit and trust. He often tries to sound smart but then just unravels under any real scrutiny to descend into screaming pure nonsense. Aggression is his only successful tactic but once you break him apart with facts and observable events you find there is nothing to worry about with that one.

He is proven untrustworthy now so there is no point to really pay him any heed.

I just see someone grasping at straws with no proof to substantiate his falseclaims. Weak sauce. 

We will see to it that the facts of his behaviour are known and not forgotten.

If we stick to the observable facts then we can not going wrong.

@THEYMOS

I REALLY BELIVE YOU ARE GOING TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT AGAINST THULE ACCOUNT AND HOLD SUCHMOON RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS FALSE FEEDBACK WHICH HE ADMITED HIMSELF GIVING BASED ON ASSUMPTION.

@suchmoon you will be one of the first in the signature campaign.

I checked your account in the past and you have a lot of dirt which will be made public

@DT MEMBERS WHY IS NOONE TAGGING SUCHMOON FOR LOW QUALITY POSTS ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=negativ+proofen+belive+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1

Keep going.

Because i am not sure there are that many red tags available.

He posts are not low quality they are of negative value in that they present faux and empty rebuttals to net positive posts and cloud the issue.

However do not worry I suspect the more these people abuse the systems of control the more people will rise up and find ways to demonstrate using facts and observable events that these people are corrupt and untrustworthy.

They are against specific criteria being set in place to make sure all persons get the same fair treatment. They want the subjectivity left inside these systems to ensure they can abuse them at will.

Says the little toddler crying about someone calling him an alt of Thule.  Scream and cry as loud as you all want, but you're not accomplishing anything, as evidenced by the fact that you've accomplished absolutely nothing.  If anyone cares about your silly little arguments, they're keeping silent--and I doubt it's out of fear of retaliation.  I doubt anyone actually takes you jokers seriously.  What they probably see are a handful of trolls who've got mommy and/or daddy issues they haven't resolved yet because they haven't grown up into adults yet.

All of you jealous tools are like Yugo drivers with no mufflers, racing each other around the Indy 500 track in front of empty seats--going around in circles, accomplishing nothing except wasting gas and making a bunch of god-awful noise.  Why don't you stop now, take your cheap little plastic trophies you purchased for yourselves, slap each other on the back, and wave to the crowd that isn't there.  Victory for you, yay. Yaaaay.

Jealousy.  Subtract the merits earned on your main account from suchmoon's earned merits, and you'll come up with a number that you'll never have a chance of earning.  That should tell you something about post quality.

Empty threats.  Heard 'em all before.

Let's see your big mouth once the signature campaign against you exposing proof will start.
It will be spread all over the forum.
Let's see how long the list will be with members who have been abused by you and the group in the past.
I bet it will be hughe

And btw racist and satanist at the same time seems to be a mental illness

Can you explain why anyone would be jealous of a broke bum like you who has been here years and still needs puppet accounts to racist troll sig spam under for some btc dust. You should be a wealthy now like 90% of other legends that had opportunity to buy for fractions of cents and sell for 100s if not 1000s of times more... many times in a row.

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17808231#msg17808231

LOL yeah we all want to be be broke ass sig spammers that are so stupid to they get busted and then think they can lecture on spamming and trolling that they can not even define or prove.

I mean the fact you are DT and merit source is hillarious and the sort of poster boy for the real need of some changes here.

Satoshi would be rolling around screaming out in pain if he notices what sort of proven liars and untrustworthy scum this boards control is being centralised towards.

Jackpot!!!

https://www.google.com/search?q=hughe+negativ+proofen+belive+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1 gives exactly one result: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2737233.0

LOL look at pharmacist meriting this. Can you pharmacist go and merit this post please

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17808231#msg17808231

I mean this one is confirmed racist trolling puppet sig spammer which is far more worrying

suchmoons one is a possibility not a proven fact like that one above so give that post 10x more merit. Thanks.

dumb ,dumber ,suchmoon LOL


You know what fat fingers are ?


Also i got way way more than 1 result

Show me.

Anyone can google themself and see the results.


You are a poor manipulator.
Once theymos will check my account i hope he will held you responsible.
I will also ask all other DT members holding you responsible for fake negativ trust.

You are trying now everything to cover your ass.Not going to work.
And you wanna know why ?
Because i'm not thule.
You made a big mistake tagging me as alt of him.BIG MISTAKE


Also i would like to show to other DT members EVEN (which is not) it would be true that i'm thule it would mean suchmoon is first tagging and later searching for evidences.
So he clearly abuse his power as DT member since i'm not thule which already proofs that he abused his power and secondly as DT member he didn't due his duty to first find evidences before giving negativ trust but posts negative trust based on assumptions.


He just proofed again that he has and had no evidences that i'm thule and is trying now very hard to create an acceptable explanation for his abusiv action.

disney man bad!

Just paste here the other links that you're seeing.

Anyone else is seeing only Thule's posts matching those words.


Your hilarious talent to misspell words exactly like Thule in your every post is just a bonus. I had no doubt that you're Thule since reading your OP but I'll take any supporting evidence so please keep providing it.

You're talking about yourself here, right?

Sorry, exactly which DT members do you think are going to stand up for you?  And do you really think Theymos is going to step in and discipline suchmoon because of a red tag?  You've got to be joking.

LOL friends need to jump in to help you out ?


here a few since you are to dumb to google

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2234267.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8248.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=recent;patrol
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=148949.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2543456.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418356.0;all


I could keep going but let the people decide themself when checking the link and your explanation.


You just proofed you abused your power.
Keep asking now your buddies to quickly jump in to safe your ass.
Dumb ,Dumber ,Suchmoon

This one has the correct spelling of "negative", not "negativ", so no. I'm not gonna bother checking the other links until you can actually find another user using the same exact words.

Suchmoon has double standards tagging regardless of what he BELIEVES here.

This person said he wanted to conceal his true identity it would not be out of realms of possibility to adopt someones posting styles or traits of cast you off of the scent? there could be any number of likely or unlikely reasons like time travel and such.

Let us focus on things we can prove 100% with facts and observable events.

Where is the tag for a proven liar?

Where is the tag for a PROVEN sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer? who admits it

Where is the tag for someone who admits trust abuse?

Answer these proven factual and observable cases before going on to suspected cases.

Seems like a opportunist chance to divert to ad hominem attacks and not tackle his central points.

There is no actual proof that this is thule but there is proof that you such moon are supporting a liar and a trust abuser and a sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer.

Seems you prefer to red tag on suspicion but not on proven fact of untrustworthy behaviour. That makes you untrustworthy Im afraid.

Let us first make sure the people on DT are worthy of trust then worry about those that have no part in the systems of control.

Where's your actual Google search link, though? I don't remember Google ever returning an ;all result.

---

stitch man bad!

LOL OMG .

So you are using that as evidence ?
Negativ is the german word.
Since english is not my best language i'm surely mixing it with german.Negativ is negative in german.So you will find over 100 million people just from german region doing this kind of mistakes.
If thats the only evidence you got (which you couldn't even have when tagging) than i have to say your standards are very low.No wonder so many people are calling you an abuser.


Just for dumb persons like you
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2855711.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087355.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4786795.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2618772.80


Just from the first google result page as majority threads are in german.
So these are all my accounts based on your poor dumb assumption ?

Hey that legandary account is using the same word like me.Are you going to tagg him as my alt ?
Since you said you tagged me because of that word i wait that you tag that account too because its using the same word.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4786795.msg43850828#msg43850828

It does sometimes. I have seen couple of times.

That user is clearly referring to the OP and not using "negativ" as a synonym for "negative". Context matters. And you used many more misspelled words and other oddities, the combination of which yields exactly one match: Thule. So good luck finding someone else who posts like that.

Keep defending.But if you don't accept him you can tagg the other hundred accounts which are using the same word as my alts.
What are you waiting for ?




@THEYMOS SERIOULSY ?????

This is an adhominem attack and diverts from the central point of this thread. It is also not a proven fact.

You yourself have no consideration for even proven facts demonstrating wrongdoing and untrustworthy deeds so don't start freaking out on a hunch.

You're confused. You've been tagged for being an alt of Thule, not for using a certain word. There was a lot more than just one word that led to it and even more surfaced afterwards. So you can try to deflect all you want but unless you can show me another user who...

- Misspells words the same way as you do. And I mean "words" not "word".
- Puts spaces around punctuation the same way you do.
- Formats paragraphs the same way you do.
- Has a grudge against the same users.

...you're not getting anywhere. New and edited posts don't count - I feel like I need to mention this given your tenuous relationship with the truth. And I mean ALL OF THE ABOVE. The totality of it makes you an alt of Thule.

NOT proof.

You have proof of lies, trust abuse and sig spamming racist sock puppet trolls and you have not red trusted any of those. Actually you support them on DT so sorry that is clear evidence you are not trustworthy and your judgement for red trust is broken.

Double standards as I have demonstrated before.

Are these your evidences LOL
Just same random claims and nothing more ?Thats it ?Show us please the evidence.You claim the same way but i see no examples from you.
Just your poor claims avoiding any serious proofing.
You could show me wrong so quickly by posting evidences.
WHERE ARE THEY?

A p-value of <0.05 is statistically significant.
A p-value of <0.001 is extremely statistically significant.

Let M := number of bct members = 2,000,000
M^-1 = 0.0000005

Haven't seen a bigger bullshit.What kind of math did you closed?Highschool only ?

I can change that.

Here are the possible outcomes:

You are Thule.
You are a troll.
You are a scammer.
You are a friend of Thule.
None of the above.

4/5 is 80%, I think suchmoon is probably right.

---

::)

100% thule - only fool who used ITO over ICO in meta

You just proofed again what kind of manipulator you are.
giving only 20% of possibility that i'm none of the mentioned people suggest to people i'm one of them.


Now here comes my math for you based on your logic


you are an asshole
you are an imbecile
you are a degenrated human
you are a scammer
you are a massiv abuser
you are a parasite
you are an alt of lauda
you are a criminal
you are a broke scamming loser
you are none of them

So the chance that your enemies are right is 90%.
Isn't that evidence enough to ban you



I guess also unable to use google  ?

SHH princess.

I thought it was an obvious joke. I even put the ::) emoji out there and prefaced with the fact that I would bullshit harder.

I'm still waiting for your answer to my question, by the way:

Somebody posting ICO must be a non crypto.There are now only ITO's or STO's

not here sunshine! ICO is the more prevalent term. take a look about

I'm very aware of that that you are not up to date

Maybe if you would talk more with project owners you would see noone is using the term ICO anymore.
Only noobs like you are

maybe for the retards you talk to - no one is buying ETH tokens any more!

The "evidences" are in your OP, in many of your other posts, and in Thule's post history. Do you really want me to start highlighting where you put a space before "?" and no space after it? The google search query already highlights words like "belive" and "hughe" and "negativ" used by exactly one user on this forum, you're just too stubborn to give up.

Here is another offer and it's very simple so you really have no reason to refuse: PM me from your Legendary account. If it's not red-trusted I'll remove your red trust and publicly apologize. I will not disclose any details about that account regardless of the outcome. It's as simple as it gets. If you don't trust me we could probably find another mutually acceptable trusted member to adjudicate this but first you must agree that you would need to prove that you own a Legendary account that is not red-trusted and is obviously not Thule.

That still wouldn't prove you're not Thule's alt (you could technically have multiple accounts; you could even hire a straw Legendary to fake this) but let's call it a compromise based on this statement:

yes and i will show other members doing the same and you are going to explain us why i'm exectly thule and not one of the other members

Also checking all his trust ratings and post maybe you can explain to me since i thought about it and don't understand even when it were true that i'm thule and this is another account of thule which rule would he have broke to get the neg reg ?

Based on forum rules


Its not saying a word about having multiple accounts are discouraged .
So lets assume i even were thule what rule did he broke for the negative tagg ?

posting in meta? with terribad english? with a hardon for Lauda and me? with a fucking deranged attitude?

its Thule - we know, nada you can do to change our mindz....

Nice deflection of suchmoon's offer. 

Account selling isn't prohibited by bitcointalk rules, but doing so is extremely bad for the forum--much like scamming, which also isn't prohibited by the rules.  I've written out all the reasons why account sales are bad and am not going to do so again here.  Members ought to be aware by now that if they buy or sell accounts, they're going to get tagged by DT members.  That's part of the community policing itself.

Let's cite some one more.

Hey, look! It's right under the one that you quoted!


What rule did all those scammers break? ::)

Theymos should probably read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100359.msg49353898#msg49353898

But somehow I think he doesn't have time to deal with delusional people, his time is better spent elsewhere.

Stop changing facts.I didn't said a single word about selling account but owning multiple accounts.
Selling accounts is officaly discouraged where owning multiple accounts which are not bought is not


Since you called him a scammer please show me who he scammed and which amount

You're so dense that I can't tell if you just don't understand English or are trolling.  You asked what rule Thule broke and why he deserves a neg, and I'm explaining why I left him a neg--it was for account dealing. 

On ignore you go.  Have fun trolling.

Obviously an alt of a red-trusted user should be red-trusted as well, otherwise what's the point of having red trust if one can evade it by using another account.

I'm waiting for that PM from your Legendary account.

But

1. you have not proven it is thule
2. thule getting red trust was a grey area at best
3. you have not red trust people that are proven liars and untrustworthy in other ways?

the entire thing seems quite double standards and demonstrates a need for entire system to be given some clear criteria of what you can and can not red trust for.

Why should i PM you loser ?So you can add negative trust with another poor claim ?
You just proofed again you are a dishonest DT sucker.
And to your reply no scammers account shoul be tagged red.And there is my question who did thule scammed ?Please show me the victim

Imagine this fool, Mcaffee and cryptohunter locked In a room for 48 hours with nothing but sexy underwear, viagra and a massive bag of cocaine.

Who would get more crazy and freaky?

Just for having this idea you deserve to be tied to a chair in that room and forced to watch it all unfold in front of you.  ;D

Just because the thought of it is giving you movement bud, admit it - you only want me there to film it for you

I said I won't do anything about the other account regardless of the outcome but if you prefer we can find another member to adjudicate this. It's a very simple action and it would take you just a minute or two if you're telling the truth.

ATM I'm certain that you're Thule and I expect that you will refuse this offer and that you will instead spend countless hours pointlessly trolling me.

1. you are proven untrustworthy so of course nobody will trust your word.
2. the onus in on you to provide proof that it is thule not the other way around.

@suchmoon

Your word means nothing.
You have proofen to abuse the trust system by giving me negativ rep without proof and trying to justify it yet with your crap.
I told from the beginning i won't show my legendary account to you muppets as history have shown that people who did it got always recked.
You guys created yourself the opinion that you can't be trusted as notorious liars.

There are ways to do it safely without me finding out what your "legendary" account is. Your refusal tells me everything I need to know and hopefully it's sufficient to alleviate anyone's doubts in the matter. Thank you.

DT1 hasn't filled up yet.  While frustrations with the current state of DT1 are certainly understandable and justified, I think it's a bit too early to be demanding changes from theymos at this point.  At least give his idea a chance to see how it works once it has been fully realized.  There's still a lot of space for positive change.  If you want to be part of the positive change, use the tools you have at your disposal (merit, trust settings).  If that doesn't work once everything is in place and somewhat static, then you might have a more legitimate gripe with the system.  For now we should chalk up the current state of DT1 to growing pains and keep faith that a better system awaits on the other side.

An alt of thule Hahahaha .
I have only one more account from 2011 which i lost access and thats why i created this one.


Its always funny how these DT members try to crash any account which raises its voice using negative feedback.
You have no evidence suchmoon as there doesn't exist anyone.You just try to make one up.

And to proof you are pathetic with the other DT members have a look at the requirements DT members ask for evidence to give negative feedback to a DT member for an accused alt account.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2575887.0

You see the diffrence there they ask for clear evidence to even think of giving a negative feedback and here they don't need any evidence as the purpose is just to discredit someone by adding negative feedback for any given reason.

You just proofed you are pathetic and a loser and nothing more.I bet in real life you are a loser too.

Are you gonna sue me for that as well?

Losers have no money i can go for and are considered a time waste.
Seeing the amount of time you spent on this forum and the date of registration i can clearly indicate you are a loser.

Since you are clearly just a waste of time you will be put on ignore from now on.

Unable to provide evidence to OP but having enough time to create endless nonsense discussion.

Is that your wife's legal advice? You were hell-bent to sue another "loser" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059200.msg47667917#msg47667917) so I'm very disappointed now.