THEYMOS ITS ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!

[itomarketing]

qs has no need to post with new accounts.

QS has more accounts then you have satoshis

I know it was mentioned many times thats why i made fun he wouldn't need based on your claims.

Also suchmoon you are a pathetic moron.
You just demanded 5 minutes ago from somebody clear proof of merit abuse where everyone can see it.
You said clearly without clear proof there is no evidence.

And here you come with your negativ feedback abuse

Alt of Thule, red-trusted user.

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.
I will ask theymos to check my account to proof i'm not him and to hold you fully accountable
for your abuse and try to defame me with false claims.

[1714968227]

1714968227

[1714968227]

1714968227

[1714968227]

1714968227

[1714968227]

1714968227

[Chosen Username]

qs has no need to post with new accounts.

QS has more accounts then you have satoshis

Proof?  do you think you should bring unsubstantiated claims ? I mean as a campaign manager? That is a seriously fragile position. If QS or anyone else started to spread unsubstantiated rumours about yourself to say new projects or their investors that put you in an untrustworthy light it could reflect on their project.

I mean think of it like this... If i found out a campaign manager was later demonstrated to spread unsubstantiated claims to discredit another user who was trying to post accurate facts and observable events that demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour then that campaign could by those actions be reasoned to be untrustworthy. I mean if he pokes his nose in seemingly to defend proven liars, system abusers and even sock puppet sig spammers then that does not look good at all.

Do you have some evidence of this or just spreading this kind of stuff for fun?

I am not saying if he does or does not.

Can you present your facts here please.

ch have more satoshis than exist accounts
me 2

[suchmoon]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

[cryptohunter]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

If you are not a liar and untrustworthy perhaps you should not be supporting one ?

[itomarketing]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.


@THEYMOS YOU DON'T CALL THIS ABUSE OF A DT MEMBER DEFAMING ME AS THULE WITHOUT PROOF ?

NOW WHAT I'M BEING TAGGED AS SCAMMER ON THIS FORUM BECAUSE OF AN ASSUMPTION WITHOUT PROOF ?
FIRST I WAS CRYPTOHUNTER NOW THULE.
WOULD I LOGIN WITH MY LEGANDARY I GUESS I WILL BE TAGGED FOR BEING AN ALT OF QS

[actmyname]

i dont kno y he xclude u b4 but it make $0.xx


he said not to tag merit abuse and you did

what you get

Why are you typing so cryptically?

I don't mind it if you do wordplay. ^{($0.xx is pretty funny)}
Just wondering, though.

ch have more satoshis than exist accounts
me 2

^{C o}_bⁿ_u^g_d^r_d^a_y^t_.^s

[suchmoon]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.

It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback for you.

On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.

Why are you typing so cryptically?

That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

[itomarketing]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.

It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback go you.

On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

[cryptohunter]

Please show me the clear proof me being alt of thule.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100071.msg49339800#msg49339800

If you're not an alt of Thule then perhaps you shouldn't be impersonating him so well.

You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.

It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback for you.

On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.

Why are you typing so cryptically?

That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

False statement. I have no alts here.

Again this is what you get from these system abusers.

I provide facts based proof and these bozos present some nonsense they make up with no support evidence AT ALL

Suchmoron has no clue how to debate, no clue on how to substantiate any of his bogus claims at all. He feels there is no need.

I can prove he is supporting a proven liar.

Can he prove I have any alts ?? no he can not.

He is untrustworthy the facts speak for themselves.

They will sink to any underhanded tactics to discredit those that oppose their collusion and untrustworthy behaviour. Therefore they are untrustworthy.

The same goes for DT who refuse to review and report back on facts and observable events that demonstrate untrustworthy behaviour from DT members and or merit sources.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

Oh, but he said this:

I have no need to post under and alt and never will.

Yeah, I peeked.  Last time.  This level of trolling is getting ridiculous--it's the same thing over and over, and the only people who give these morons any support are alt accounts.  It's polluting Meta and Reputation and creating more drama amidst all the inherent drama involved with the major adjustment in the trust system.  Is anyone moderating Meta?  TMAN's local rule in his last thread really ought to have been enforced instead of letting the trolls run rampant.

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

Fucking grow up.

[cryptohunter]

That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.

Oh, but he said this:

I have no need to post under and alt and never will.

Yeah, I peeked.  Last time.  This level of trolling is getting ridiculous--it's the same thing over and over, and the only people who give these morons any support are alt accounts.  It's polluting Meta and Reputation and creating more drama amidst all the inherent drama involved with the major adjustment in the trust system.  Is anyone moderating Meta?  TMAN's local rule in his last thread really ought to have been enforced instead of letting the trolls run rampant.

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

Fucking grow up.

Here now we observe the double standards shit posting sock puppet trolling racist the pharmacist.

He is a proven shit posting troll using racist and offensive junk to spam his other sig for btc dust but come here to lecture and spout unsubstantiated and false junk himself about supposed trolling ...whilst spamming his sig lol

What a double standards corrupt person we can clearly observe he is and very untrustworthy indeed.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17808231#msg17808231

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096914.0



i would suggest visiting that thread and then reviewing the evidence before leaving a comment to relate your thoughts on the entire debacle

[suchmoon]

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

On a scale  of 1 to 10, how much do you love Vod?

1 being "I'm Thule"
10 being "I'm pretending I'm not Thule"

[itomarketing]

You bitch know exectly why only alts are joining that discussion as history has proofen that any legit account got instantly crashed by your scamming group


Vod is another bitch who abused the system in favour of that scamming group.
Additionaly he is a dumb person.
Do i agree with Thule ?I would love to had seen Thule given him a lesson as Vod was completly wrong and trying to defand himself with poor
scare tactics.
I'm wondering he still haven't joined that thread.
Maybe the last confrontation made him use his brain a bit.

[suchmoon]

You bitch know exectly why only alts are joining that discussion as history has proofen that any legit account got instantly crashed by your scamming group


Vod is another bitch who abused the system in favour of that scamming group.
Additionaly he is a dumb person.
Do i agree with Thule ?I would love to had seen Thule given him a lesson as Vod was completly wrong and trying to defand himself with poor
scare tactics.

https://www.google.com/search?q=negativ+proofen+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1

Tell us more how you "agree" with Thule.

[cryptohunter]

THEYMOS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT SO YOU CAN CHECK YOURSELF I'M NOT THULE AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACK WHICH IS MARKING ME AS SCAMMER ON THE WHOLE BOARD.
IF YOU CONSIDER GIVING FALSE NEGATIV FEEDBACKS BY DT MEMBERS WHO ADMIT THEY HAVE NO HARD LEGIT PROOF BUT ONLY A POOR ASSUMPTION IT MEANS YOU ACTIVLY ALLOW TO ABUSE THAT SYSTEM ON INNOCENT MEMBERS AND YOU ARE THE PROBLEM

On a scale  of 1 to 10, how much do you love Vod?

1 being "I'm Thule"
10 being "I'm pretending I'm not Thule"

Why answer any for a proven protector and support of a liar like suchmoon?

Lol look at him providing sensible discussion here NOT. As always his posts are mostly low functioning drivel or net negative caustic junk that seeks to protect and enable the status quo of system abusers both merit and trust. He often tries to sound smart but then just unravels under any real scrutiny to descend into screaming pure nonsense. Aggression is his only successful tactic but once you break him apart with facts and observable events you find there is nothing to worry about with that one.

He is proven untrustworthy now so there is no point to really pay him any heed.

I just see someone grasping at straws with no proof to substantiate his falseclaims. Weak sauce. 

We will see to it that the facts of his behaviour are known and not forgotten.

If we stick to the observable facts then we can not going wrong.

[itomarketing]

@THEYMOS

I REALLY BELIVE YOU ARE GOING TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT AGAINST THULE ACCOUNT AND HOLD SUCHMOON RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS FALSE FEEDBACK WHICH HE ADMITED HIMSELF GIVING BASED ON ASSUMPTION.

@suchmoon you will be one of the first in the signature campaign.

I checked your account in the past and you have a lot of dirt which will be made public

@DT MEMBERS WHY IS NOONE TAGGING SUCHMOON FOR LOW QUALITY POSTS ?

[suchmoon]

@THEYMOS

I REALLY BELIVE YOU ARE GOING TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT AGAINST THULE ACCOUNT AND HOLD SUCHMOON RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS FALSE FEEDBACK WHICH HE ADMITED HIMSELF GIVING BASED ON ASSUMPTION.

@suchmoon you will be one of the first in the signature campaign.

I checked your account in the past and you have a lot of dirt which will be made public

@DT MEMBERS WHY IS NOONE TAGGING SUCHMOON FOR LOW QUALITY POSTS ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=negativ+proofen+belive+site:bitcointalk.org&nfpr=1

Keep going.

[cryptohunter]

@THEYMOS

I REALLY BELIVE YOU ARE GOING TO CHECK MY ACCOUNT AGAINST THULE ACCOUNT AND HOLD SUCHMOON RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS FALSE FEEDBACK WHICH HE ADMITED HIMSELF GIVING BASED ON ASSUMPTION.

@suchmoon you will be one of the first in the signature campaign.

I checked your account in the past and you have a lot of dirt which will be made public

@DT MEMBERS WHY IS NOONE TAGGING SUCHMOON FOR LOW QUALITY POSTS ?

Because i am not sure there are that many red tags available.

He posts are not low quality they are of negative value in that they present faux and empty rebuttals to net positive posts and cloud the issue.

However do not worry I suspect the more these people abuse the systems of control the more people will rise up and find ways to demonstrate using facts and observable events that these people are corrupt and untrustworthy.

They are against specific criteria being set in place to make sure all persons get the same fair treatment. They want the subjectivity left inside these systems to ensure they can abuse them at will.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

You bitch know exectly why only alts are joining that discussion as history has proofen that any legit account got instantly crashed by your scamming group

Says the little toddler crying about someone calling him an alt of Thule.  Scream and cry as loud as you all want, but you're not accomplishing anything, as evidenced by the fact that you've accomplished absolutely nothing.  If anyone cares about your silly little arguments, they're keeping silent--and I doubt it's out of fear of retaliation.  I doubt anyone actually takes you jokers seriously.  What they probably see are a handful of trolls who've got mommy and/or daddy issues they haven't resolved yet because they haven't grown up into adults yet.

All of you jealous tools are like Yugo drivers with no mufflers, racing each other around the Indy 500 track in front of empty seats--going around in circles, accomplishing nothing except wasting gas and making a bunch of god-awful noise.  Why don't you stop now, take your cheap little plastic trophies you purchased for yourselves, slap each other on the back, and wave to the crowd that isn't there.  Victory for you, yay. Yaaaay.

@DT MEMBERS WHY IS NOONE TAGGING SUCHMOON FOR LOW QUALITY POSTS ?

Jealousy.  Subtract the merits earned on your main account from suchmoon's earned merits, and you'll come up with a number that you'll never have a chance of earning.  That should tell you something about post quality.

Let's see your big mouth once the signature campaign against you exposing proof will start.
It will be spread all over the forum.

Empty threats.  Heard 'em all before.

[itomarketing]

Let's see your big mouth once the signature campaign against you exposing proof will start.
It will be spread all over the forum.
Let's see how long the list will be with members who have been abused by you and the group in the past.
I bet it will be hughe

And btw racist and satanist at the same time seems to be a mental illness