Bitcoin Forum

I have no doubts after a few observation but ieos are just an upgrade how ?

Ieos that successfully sold out on binance bittrex and kucoin, can they sold out on latoken? Or dobi trades  ?

Main focus is; in ieos hundreds get to participate , then after ieo is over; it leaves thousands of people eager to get in and be a part of the movement

This causes an upturn in price for few days; then the usual dip that follows ico token after listing takes place too

So what’s the difference exactly ??

NB: just my thoughts ; feel free to modify, suggest and contribute

Exactly, but there a few advantages of this IEO compare to regular ICO. Before that coin listed to be sold at exchanger, the team behind it must be complete some sort of KYC right? that's mean now we know that all people that listed on the page is real and not just some random picture from Google. If an exchanger wants to list a coin to sell without doing some background checking that exchanger name itself will be bad.

the only difference i find between ico and ieo is that, ieos are thoroughly vetted by binance or bittrex, less chances of getting scammed. other than that they are same as ico. anyway i dont buy into these overhyped shits.

It's seems that people are after for quick benefits just a like with how ico's works, after getting into exchange early investors will just dumped the coins and take all the profits that they've got, just like how also IEO's works, it will ended just the same after some days or weeks inside the the market.

An upgraded version where investors see and grab opportunities if given a chance.

I agree with you. There is not much difference between ICOs and IEOs. But what I like about the IEOs is that it shows seriousness of the team and reduces the chances of exit scam since they have to submit documentation on the exchange before they list for the IEO sales.

But the chances of raising fund by a trash coin is too low because exchange like binance, bittrex will not vouch for a shit projects. Moreover, if BTC price decreases, almost all of the coins price decreases. So, there's nothing an IEO project can do.

but it's better bro. rather than overly free ICOs, the IEO gives little hope because of this through exchange. although overall it's the same. but see there are many who think the IEO can give new hope to the community today.

Binance, Bittrex and the likes are well known exchanges with huge number of users around the world, when they conduct an IEO it means they have carefully vetted the project, because of this many investors feel very comfortable to participate in this ieo's, the fear of getting scam is very minimal in this case, and also the chances that such project will automatically be listed in the exchange that conducted the IOE unlike ico's which struggles to get listed. The major difference is the security and the automatic listing opportunity.

it maybe is just an upgrade and offers nothing to the community, like the top coins n the market have done, but it's safer because in ICO the dev can run away or have no intention listing their coin, whereas in IEO, the coin is already listed and people are trading, but it's still going on the platform of the project.

one thing that makes people believe in the IEO is that they don't need to think about the Kyc because of the exchange that handles this. so they are afraid of hacked personal data and so on. maybe you're right IEO and ICO have no difference. it is only part of marketing tricks, but that is not wrong. yes maybe if the IEO is done in an exchange like LAtoken or even another exchange that has few users, surely the IEO will not be as successful as those who do in large exchanges.

You have your point but you cannot point out that they are just tricks or somewhat an upgrade in order to earn some money from investors.
You have no concrete evidence yet that they are just an upgrade but they have similarities also if we are going to compare them using an assumptions.

But you should not worry too much if you are not an investor as you will not be affected by it. But if you are somewhat an investors, then you need to do some research and avoid those tricks that you think is only an upgrade in order to steal your hard earned money.

Yeah, I think IEO and ICO are basicly the same which token/voin offering to collect fund for project development. The main different or advantage is IEO is hold by an exchange so that the IEO should be a verified project. I am sure exchanges like Binance or Bittrex or others would have checked and rechecked the project and the people behind were legit.

you are very correct, IEOs are not different from ICOs. I already observed this and have made it clear on my comments long before now. Many think IEOs has anything different about it. The worst part of it all is the IEOs has a greater disadvantages where smaller investors finds it difficult to participate in its supposed offerings.

Absolutely right, IEO is not strong on its own. Exchanges are give it strength. So, sales would be up to the power of exchanges. Sales in exchange may be more secure, but it is more convincing in the big ones.

There is no too much difference between them. But there is one obvius thing. The coin which sale in exchange, will be listed in that exchange. So it is so important. And easy to reach. You can basically invest the project. There is no complicated and risky methods.

IEO is far better than  ico, in terms of security. This upgrade can guarranteed payment but not the price unlike ICO, payment and price are both  in danger. In IEO if this hold by reputable exchange we can sure to get profit for it. Just like what happened on binance for thwir latest IEO offering

I also think that this is just some kind of new way of cheating users, but this method is covered by large exchanges.

IEO has a better chance of success than ICO when done in a reputable exchange and not exchanges that careless about their investors. There are chances that team won't run away from fund, even though their project may still fail in the future, the time it takes to listing the project in order to test the murky water of the market may not be very long as some ICO go on sabbatical leave after end of their ICO. Something but different approach.

When we say, an upgrade: it means that there is something new that is added to it, in order to make things better, but as far as I can see, IEOs are not upgrade, they are simplification of how ICO's are working in the market. They are meant to increase the hype for a particular coin in order to get market so, for me, it is much more efficient that ICOs.

Of course, IEO's are just the way of making the fundraising more effective and at the same time makes the project more known if launched in a big exchange, yes this is no different in ICO's which just accumulates funds from the investors to continue the project, but you know Big exchanges conduct research before listing the coin/token for their IEO platform, hence investors feel more at ease of getting their investments safer than the ICO.
You just need to be responsible for your investments, choose the right one that you think is safe or don't invest at all, but for me, IEO is a really good thing that happened for the altcoin projects and also investors.

It is very much effective compared to a regular ICO. What I truly love the most is that the Exchange verifies the project before they can do an IEO. Some exchanges also takes advantage of their utility token. Like for example Binance! They made the the investors buy $BNB before they can participate in the token sale since it only accepts $BNB which caused the $BNB token to go up in price. Some IEO are not effective though just like the projects at Dobi Trade Exchange. I got disappointed because they are not that known and that after the token sale, the project behind the IEO seemed to have gone just like a bubble.

Well one good news tonight is that another ieo was a huge success at okex (blockcloud)
It got sold out within 1 seconds

Who bought it? Few number of investors
Let’s enjoy each trades  and dyor too

Not sure about that when veriblock that has already sold in a few minutes is not getting a big hype and that was trade below the ico price after it listed on the bittrex. Basically how fast it's getting sold doesn't matter a lot in the price after it listed on exchange site.

There is a big difference between ICOs and IEOs. With IEOs, before the project will be able to launch their IEO on an exchange platform, the exchange platform obtain the necessary information from the project team members to avoid investors from being scammed. Also with IEOs, investors can monitor the progress of the token sales and how successful the project will be.

the difference is that fraud risk is smaller than ICO because IEOS is not like an ICO whose project is not running and the concept is different so IEOS will not commit fraud because if they do then their exchangers reputation will be at stake and that is very detrimental because without starting IEOS in fact, they profit from all transactions that occur on their exchanger
but honest, even so I still prefer ICO

That is a good observation. Some good number of ICOs are now converting into IEOs, so as to make fast sakes and at the end, they still remain as ICO.
The same experience, encountered by ICO investors back in the days of ICO boom, is still being encountered.

Basically it depends on the project itself. If the project is a better one, it will be hyped, no matter when. But no trash will be hyped. However, veriblock seems to be a good one and I already have invested 0.10 BTC on it, although I'm in pure loss now.

Of course, there is no difference. The product you are buying is the same.

But some difference is there like guaranteed listing and an exchange guarantee that says the project is legit.

Yeah, IEOs that successfully sold out only on big exchanges like Binance, bittrex and huobi. On the other hand, IEOs on small exchanges like latoken not selling well. In my opinion it's same like ICO but with help of big exchanges and it's effective though. The sell is sold out easily.

The differences are obvious in the outcome, in the sense that, IEOs give investors more confidence in the process of investment.
The exchanges hosting such IEOs are putting their reputations at stake and are making investors know that the investment is safe for them.

I think the exclusive difference between ico and ieos
Is that the risk factor will be conquered by the exchange platforms

But still, there’s no security for investment just as veriblock has traded below ieo price leaving some investors in panic

Those project might not successfully get sold out on those exchanges that are not popular, that is why many projects that wishes to register as IEO makes use of exchanges that are well known as Binance, Binance started this project and they got the trust of investors based on their personality and based on the trust they have in them.

This IEO plan should have been left to them to handle since the issue we are having with ICO is that of trust and projects not being verified, ICO project are not being verified while IEO projects are being verified by top exchanges that has taken their time to do so. So the difference between both of them is that of TRUST and Security of investors.

The different is IEO has offering more security than most of unregulated ICO's that still victimized unsuspected investors including me, Theres is no question regarding how Cryptocurrency works, we all know that already and most investors know that after listing on exchange the price may down or up! that trend is doesnt matter anymore the important aspect why IEO's was trending thats because of the Security far from exits scam ICO's.

exchanges very aware if they launched IEO.if investors didn't get any profit from this even, their reputation could be staked.if this event failed and investors loss it could give negative effect to them.so they will not list project carelessly.

The only reason why some IEO were successful in binance and kucion was because the projects are really great but then again price will still plunge when real investors gets in while tokens are readily available in the market. It does happen every time in ICO. I think this is just to cut the bounty hunters out. Right now there are still ICO while IEO also exits so both are still working.

I have not followed these coins that just finished their crowdfunding in these exchange, but based on your post they are all still a pump and dump coins, but it's early to tell all coins in the market coming from crowdfunding are not performing well also, we'll see if the market shifted to bull run, if these coins are also going to do well.

that is exactly what i have been saying ever since ICO turned into STO and then into IEO and maybe in a little while they change the name into something different.

ALL of these things have a different name but do the exact same thing. a group of people ask you for money and give you a useless token in return. and they dump their own premined tokens and get out doing nothing more to the project they were advertising before.
whether it is run on an exchange or independently or has the name "security" in it makes no difference at all.

I think that bounty hunters have absolutely nothing to do with it. it's just another way of manipulating on the market and taking money from users.

IEO will make bounty hunter sad, good project prefer use their fund to list their projects in reputable exchanges such as binance or another exchanges.its more effective and make investors trust to their projects.

I am agree with OP, people's just buying IEO because of listing confirmation. Because if any exchange offering IEO that means they are going to listed it on their exchange. So users know that their money would be safe. Whoever bought token on IEO they has been sold on profit. Although I am not sure if someone were bought successfully. But those users bought after IEO, means when listed on exchange they are on huge loss. Because token price drop rapidly after IEO especially on Bittrex. So I had not bother ever to buy token after listed on exchange. I really don't want to lose my money.

the only different just there is big name of exchange market that backup their project.
if project goes scam the name of that exchange will be bad too. so we should choose wisely which exchange that hold IEO

To me the difference is great, IEOs pay lack of respect to project development, majority of the IEOs play into the hands of whales and do not encourage the participation of small time investors and lastly IEOs give room for more manipulation than the ICO mechanism.

The main advantage of IEOs is a certainity that tokens will be listed on that exchange and also advertising which is done by exchange marketing.

Participating in IEO's is much safer compared to ICO's and the exchanges give their due diligence to these projects. The exchanges have already verified the developers and it passed the necessary requirements before it was accepted. It is safe to say that IEO's in Binance and other reputable exchanges are legit.

If you like it or not, these type of projects will be probably something bigger in future and many of them (better ones) is going to give very good ROI for investors.

Yes this is the point everyone is failing to acknowledge or accept. Veriblock has concluded the sold out, and after a few bright side has successfully traded below ieo

Am keeping the projects on radar (incl BTT) to see if they will really complete the developments
Everyone just needs to continue to research and stay safe by trading smartly

IEOs are simply another way carefully packaged to get investors buying and investing again. They may have come with some much better packaging and presentation but they are simply no different than ICOs. Sooner or later IEOs will find themselves where ICOs is at the moment. My advice is for people to thread cautiously and be mindful of how and what they invest.

I do not think that ieos will affect bounty hunters; because Blockmason Link, publish protocol, viaz, curestoken and many other projects are doing bounties and also employing ieos crowdfunding method

So I want to believe that; bounty hunters get to promote and select the best bounties always

I think the difference is that Exchanges before listing IEO on their exchange check ID's before listing them and some other adresses , as exchange risk reputation by listing projects on IEO's . Ofcourse it does not say that project can't be a scam , but i think its alot better than participation in ICO's :)

IEO is an evolution of ICO. It's easier, more investor friendly and more modern if you like. That's strange that exchanges didn't create this product before and ICOs were dominating for the whole 2018 year.

Actually there is some sense here. IEO is just ICO in another dimension. The only big difference is that, if it's coming from a reputable exchange like Binance, Okex, Huobi, Kucoin etc, they will do proper due diligence to ensure they list a legit project, they are best at that. Now see the twist in the IEO/ICO thing 👇
Recently, some projects which already launched ICO and didn't do well, or are still struggling with ICO changed to IEO. Good examples include X-block and Gemstra. I also observed that some exchanges like LATOKEN list IEOs too much, making it look like a normal ICO thing. Even mushroom exchanges started listing IEOs Lol 😂,  it's well.

Conducting an initial coin offering through an exchange might sound a little safer because it addresses one key issue that plighted many an ICO; the option to sell the tokens at a later date. Coins were often sold through an ICO with only promises that they would later be available on exchanges. In some cases, tokens offered through an ICO were never listed on exchanges. So even if it's an upgrade to ico tricks,  it's still safer for investors.

This exactly represents my thoughts. I don't particularly see and differences except that in ICO, investors loose funds to project developers and in IEO, investors loose funds to exchange team who buy up the tokens and dump on members of the exchange who didn't get in. The end point is still loss for investors.

This is the very reason why you should not buy the hype surrounding an IEO project.
As everyone already observed, they were just sold in few seconds or minutes, leaving us stunned by such situation.
Who were able to buy that fast? Is there a loophole in this system? Probably yes, or probably not.
But if you are a buyer, don't buy the hype but look for more concrete reason why you should join the bandwagon.
Look for the technology that they are offering. Do they have the capability to deliver their promises?
And now, we are slowly seeing that not all IEO projects are going to be successful. Many have already dropped their price from their IEO price.
Again, we will be deceived by this new trend if we are not smart enough to tell which one is the real deal and which one is not.

l

It is the problem we currently face at the moment. Every exchange wants to cash in, especially through their coin. Recently, Bilaxy launched its native token to join the frenzy. I hope they don't deface IEOs sooner than expected

I do not see any difference either. Both the highly glorified IEO and ICO are the same. Right now, IEO is overhyped and abused. Soon, a different story will be heard about it.

that's indeed and we have seen how top network was doing something good and that was using bounty campaign too. those people are sceptical with it must try to do a lot of research. It looks like they are still feeling doubt with it and that's it. Bounty will have always needed.

Well, thinking of the price in the market, it may be true, the price after IEO is over maybe quite the same with what happened to ICO. However, this crowdfunding type of IEO may also give benefit different from the ICO.
They are listing their token or coin on the certain exchange, right? When they are listing, they may also fulfill the KYC process and some regulation as regulated in the exchange.
That is why it will add the trust that their team may not be fake. Of course, it can be one of the ways to avoid scams, moreover, knowing that the coins have been listed on the certain exchange.

Yes, upgrading from a less secure ICON is safe. The point is the IEO is safer than ICO. Because Exchanger has sorted out really good projects. And our risk of losing money will be lower than ICO, which is sometimes not a listing at all on an exchanger.

Yes! Exactly, there is not so much difference between ICO and IEO, the only difference I can identify is that IEO are being regulated by popular exchanges that have already made name for themselves and have gotten lots of investors that might be interested in investing in this projects, though I don't see this as a very big progress but a way that exchanges can now perform a very good exist scam, I just hope that we don't experience such in the crypto space, because all hope will be lost.

In my own opinion there is no much difference rather than the team behind the project will pass through series of investigation so as to ensure they are legit thus reducing scams. With the way IEOs are going they might end up being another thing all together.

The difference between ICO and IEO is not that much but IEO is just safer and that's why they will always get tokens sold out because many investors are jumping in ,I guess ICO has let many investors down enough

Totally no difference and a lot of similarities which makes it odd
But if ieos can find consistency in price, volume and fulfillment of project roadmap and whitepaper

Then maybe we can consider it fruitful

I think that they have their own features and I believe they have finally discovered the problem, why people were not ready to take part in ICOs during the last year. They only needed a guarantee that those tokens are going to be listed on a good exchange and IEOs are solving this problem.

The exchange itself will give some assurance about the project, they will surely list it after the IEO's  little assurance is much better than nothing at  all, that's the difference but the concept still their funding projects but this time listing is an assurance unlike with ICO's where there's no concrete plans adding the project after.

The difference between ICO and IEO is not that big. The reliability of projects that will be better controlled by the exchanges interested in them is slightly increased. And so everything remains the same, you will have to think all the same by yourself.

There is a difference between ICO and IEO, but there is no big difference between them, the only difference I can identify is that IEO is controlled by popular exchanges that have already made name for themselves thereby building trust for investors who will like to participate in this project, unlike ICO that you don't know if the project is legit or not since you don't k or the persons involved in developing this projects, this is the only difference I can identify.

ICO gave birth to IEO as a result of the scam activities that was going on, so these exchanges took it upon themselves to make sure every project they registered are being verified personally to be sure it is not a scam project and also confirm how valuable such project is which we lack in ICO, no one verifies ICO which makes it an easy target for scammers, and the biggest of it is that IEO is more helpful to developers as they get to meet up with their hardcap within a short time frame because of the trust they have in the platform carrying such IEO out.

There may not be any big differences between ICO and IEO but as long as exchanges keep their credibility then definitely IEO may bring differences among investors perspective.

Pretty much agree with the OPs post. The IEO craze will eventually die off, but at the moment there is still a chance to make a big buck via this channel of flipping. I am interested in what will be the next "big thing" after that, probably STOs.

They are same once ICO scam burst out , scammers need new way to pull money out of people so hence came IEO, just like ICO market got busted after few years , this IEO market will also get busted within next few years once people see no real progress in projects. The only benefit anybody can get for now is speculators and scammers , if you are a good one , sieze the maximum out of it.

It didn't need a few years to know and busted the scam project because they don't exist for a long time. Soon, people will know about the truth because the scammers will not work for a long time. Besides that, I am sure people now become smart to decide to join in the project, and they can be able to search for more information about the project before they join.

It seem's to be true but I like IEO more than ICO .
IEO offers a share on their profit and have an active project but it all depends on how good their exchange would work.
I only tried one IEO and it is ethershift and for me I think it is working fine, Just have to wait till it blooms.

There is no particular difference. Of course, IEO on an  exchange with a good reputation this is a guarantee of the safety of investments for investor . A positive factor from IEO is the crowding out of fraudsters from the market. But IEO will increase competition among exchanges and small-volume exchanges will disappear from market.This will create corruption in the exchange market and large exchanges will begin to promote and offer their service tokens. For small investors  this will create an inconvenience and they will go to ICO again.

I suggest you only join the IEO with just a big exchange, this is to minimize the risk of scam because we know that now almost all exchanges also provide IEO features. but not all can be trusted, because manipulation is still very possible.

IEO = new wine in old bottle, no more than. Even that IEO is worst than ICO because the ICO trend had made good impact to crypto market for a long time, while IEO corrupts too soon.

Ieos are technically derived word for Sec acceptance Ico have a lot of backfire in the past from Sec and government authority so Ieo terminally and guidelines may help cryptocurrency to expand further

When I picture IEO projects, I strictly don’t out other exchanges in the picture, any projects that cannot be handled by Binance, I don’t participate in it, most of other exchanges are into it just to compete with Binance and they reputation.

The only exchange I can guarantee right now with very high reputation, that investors don’t need to worry or think twice before participating in any IEO is Binance alone, they have proven themselves to be very trust worthy and we all know how active and hardworking their CEO and team are. A time will come that those other exchanges will low reputation might want to destroy IEO, but Binance will surely make it impossible for them.

Of course there is a big difference and to say that ICO and IEO are one and the same is probably not correct, but in general it is a process of fundraising, only in IEO the exchange leaves for the guarantor. I think this is not entirely correct.

According to yours, such big exchanges as Binance, Bittrex, Huobi, OKEX will resort to deceiving users through such a mechanism as ICO (IEO), according to you, they will risk their reputation so much. Honestly, I can't even imagine it. Even if the projects launched by them are frankly bad, investors are all exactly getting tokens and a chance to earn.

Yep, when you buy tokens from ieo you are getting the same thing.

The only difference is there is a middleman as a guaranteer. So, i don't see a huge difference.

The main issue is the same unsolved; a lot of potential exchange users complain of inabilities to participate in ieos
Who then buys the tokens ?

Even with guarantees, why do such tokens still dump easily and fiercely

IEO is really not much different from ICO. But I think that IEO is better than ICO. This removes many of the risks associated with ICO. Therefore, I think that IEO has a positive effect on ICO.

some ICO projects might switch to the IEO to make confidence in the arrival of investors. but don't ever trust the IEO quickly, because even if sales are successful, the project may not be able to develop their platform so that prices can match or be better than their IEO prices.

That is correct.
I noted this during a dicoursewith my crypto friends.
I told them after that binance held it's first launch pad that the IEO model is far from being transparent.
If you look further,you will find out to your amazement that it's mostly the project team and the exchange team that are buying bulk of the tokens.

What upgrades means to you? Upgrade is changing something to the way it could be more good. Its trying to solve something that ICO cant do right now.  So dont jump on the conclusion that still not happened. Just support things we have now and give somethings to us crypto users. Use it as long as can give you profit then leave if become worthless

With IEO investors become less attentive and completely trust in the verification analysis of the exchange and its reputation. I will cite a recent example of the IEO by scam's team on IDAX.
http://static2.keep4u.ru/2019/04/18/1adab1487449facc2b326b.md.jpg (http://keep4u.ru/image/SYD01)

http://static2.keep4u.ru/2019/04/18/1adab2a9d51d864c008034.md.jpg (http://keep4u.ru/image/SYD0n)

No, not really. There is a big wall of difference between them. Apart from the name and where they are conducted - IEO on exchanges, ICO on open ground, the first is more organized and secured. I would participate in IEO and never in ICO.

The issue of price rise and dump after IEO is a normal thing in business. It's called profit taking. People sell off when they reach their profit target. It's not the same thing as what we have in ICO where devs abandon projects.

ICO was too loosed and because it was not regulated, and you and I know that where there is no law, there is no sin, you can’t compare something that is being regulated to something not regulated.

IEO might not be completely regulated, but at least it still has the involvement of third party who can control what is being displayed to the public by verifying it first before publishing, Scammers might try all their best to penetrate the IEO market but the only way they can succeed is if money hungry exchanges too gets involved in IEO.

Provided IEO I still being controlled and operate by top exchanges such as Binance, Bitmex, Huobi and many other ones, I doubt if scam will be able to penetrate.

Well I can sense that you prefer the chance to earn rather than consider the damage ahead
I advise you always trade smart and smarter

Lition ico was about 2x few hours back; icos are still alive

Sooner or later; we can judge the tricks by ourselves

Yes you are right entirely. But from another angle, IEOs (at least for now) has proven to be safer, as there is no chance for any scam project to pass the verification of these exchanges. That is to say also, it is wise to take note of the exchange conducting the IEO to ensure safety of funds.
Lastly, if IEOs will be properly managed, it will be better than ICOs in the long run.

The main benefit from IEOs is that they are supervised by the exchanges but that does not  guarantee the
high ROI. I agree with you that they can be over hyped after listing and I would not touch them for a certain period.

One big facts I cited unattended to
Investors have stopped doing necessary research information; and investing based on trust on the exchange platform

It isn’t safe that way
Dyor always ico ieo or sto

Yes IEO is just an upgrade but it is way better in fundraising part and it's has better trusty than ICO due to been lunched on trusted exchanges,it won't be easy for scam artists to mindle with,i think IEO is way better, investors need some sort of trusted source to investment and IEO does the job well

We should call it as crypto hot trend. We have some hot trend so far.
- exchange hot trend: that switch most profitable coins from Poloniex to Bittrex, and then Binance.
- ICO hot trend.
- exchange's coin or token launched with massive promotions (give aways) hot trend.
- and now, IEO hot trend.

Its an upgrade though. You may not see any difference to it since it both just waste your money when price drops sudenly after the IEO.  Sooner the scammers will alzo upgrade skills. Years from now this IEO will also fade and another trend will follow til we may go back to IPO instead. Or probably we'd soon see trading software where from there we can be connecting to crowdfunding platform.

Project team looking for better way to make money that is why IEOs were in the trend for now and it is same as ICO,if a project is good the people invest on it but when it is promoted by exchanges then chances of getting traffic to that project is high.

I think there are many improvements. The first is that the cap for each IEO is usually not too big, only about $ 1 million or less, which helps attract investors because they believe in the ability to pump prices after the official listing.
Secondly, the IEO pledges token will be listed on the exchange, unlike ICO when we don't know about it.

Due to the large trading volumes and the number of traders, the price from a great height will fall for a long time, and gives time to the project for development, IEO has some little advantages.

I would say that today IEO doesn’t really bring anything new in it, I think it’s best to create some kind of barriers for developers who attract investment in cryptocurrency projects. This is probably the easiest thing to do.

I am going to agree with you to some extent but not to the fullest because ICO cannot totally be compared with IEO.

Unlike ICO, IEO is referred to as initial exchange offering, whereby exchanges that has gained name already carry out crowd funding for companies instead of them carrying out themselves in the form of ICO, the good thing about this is that this exchanges have built trust with investors over time and would not want to lose that trust for any reason whatsoever, so the make sure all projects pass through KYC process.

The IEO brought new features, fortunately. If you can analyze the market situations then the differences will be clear in front of your eyes. Attracting new investors is the job of bounty teams, so let them think about it.

ieos are totaly scam,

exchanges are tellıng that they sold all tokens ın 5 mıns but they never sell, they sell that tokens from open market after 2 days and people buy that tokens 2-3x hıher price because everybody thinks that ico finished in 5 mins, binance started that scam method and other exchanges follow it

Still it is a crowd funding so it is has the same goal but as said as OP it is an upgrade.  Though IEO had been practiced in the early years but in different name.  There are several tokens that conduct their crowdfunding in an exchange way back years ago so this IEO method is not new to the industry, just the name to make a new hype I guess which somehow successful for the first projects.  Let us see if the following IEO will be as successful as the first one.

For a more or less reliable verification of the team that wants to issue its new tokens, the administration of the exchanges should examine the original documents of this team and have the authority to check them in more depth. Such powers exchanges do not have. This check can only be done by law enforcement agencies of states. Therefore, I think that in the near future we will face scandals with fraudulent IEO already on the exchanges. In any case, the exchanges will be able to accept no more than a tenth of the submitted projects and the rest will be forced to collect funds in the ICO format.

I think IOCs is just the new form of ICO. It comes at a time when the market of ICOs is on the verge of collapse. So it definitely aims to retain the market of ICO. It aims to provide more investment security, thus attracting more investors. Offering coins on exchanges can give much assurance that the project will definitely list on exchanges in coming days. As a result, investors are much eager to participate in it.

Not much difference but IEOs does get an advantage of guaranteed listing by the exchange that is hosting the IEO. Plus they save lots by not running a bounty campaign.

IEO is only good for me in the short term because when everyone has got coins from the IEO and the market is available they will definitely sell their coins immediately to make a profit.

A really good advantage for the project. With IEO, they are just promoting the project via social media channels at a very short period of time. Unlike ICOs, most of them undergo the backbreaking bounty programs that run for months and months, and when they haven't reached their financial targets, they will extend their ICO to the point where participants are already tired of doing their tasks.

But as we are starting to observe , most of the buyers of these IEO tokens or coins are just for short-term profit. Hoping that they will get a good sum of money afterwards. So in the end, it is just like ICO with faster turn around. The price still decline once the trading starts to move in that exchange.

IEO(Initial Exchange Oferring) have some advantages ahead of ICO(Initial Coin Offering) which makes it more preferred in this time. an example is the assurance of listing on the exchange immediately after the sale is over which dosent happen for an ICO project.  also it gives just limited number of people the chance to participate which breeds scarcity and make people want to buy the token when they list it. its more a quick way to make profit for anyone that is able to buy during the IEO.

As you know most of ICO's are scams and little are trusted and investors are not investing in ICO's and IEO is new form of ICO's and investor feeling secure their investment in IEO.

ICO's are not getting success and IEO,s are getting success because launching by exchanges and this is true when token or coin launched than price is pump by investors and after that goes down and various investor suffer loss.

In ICO, one set of people only will make the money but the in IEO launch people will be invest on coins as well as forced to sell the tokens when the coins have been listed after the tokens has been started trading there.
Usually IEO use to give the pairs for their native coins so circulation for the exchange's coins will grow more.
Please do research about the project and then invest on the ICO or IEO.

On the contrary it can be sold in a few minutes, but to whom? Even when the sales countdown started, I saw 4 people getting it in the first second. Probably Binance wants to make a profit from trade too.

You are kind of right about this, IEOs are just an upgrade on ICOs. And they reason people prefer them is because they are less prone to scam unlike ICOs. I have also noticed that projects that launch their IEO on big exchanges tend to raise enough money and do well than projects on other exchanges. And this is because of the large volumes on these big exchanges.

I think the IEO has brought some new things to the market. After a gloomy year, IEO has made the market active again, Bitcoin prices rose to $ 5k3 and some altcoin has doubled or tripled this year.

That's the intentions of those opportunistic traders, they are just buying to make a good cut of the profits that they can possibly get from this new system for investment, IEO's became so popular as binance cater the service assuring that after the sale period the coin will automatically or guarantee to be listed inside the exchange giving the chance for early investors to sell it out right away.

For sure it is just an upgrade, it is not a revolution or something else. It is the same ICO model, but with a guarantee that those tokens are going to be listed on this exchange. Thats why they are so popular at the moment.

The main reason why IEO is better than the ICO is that the token after sales is guaranteed to be listed on the exchange in the near future. After all, this is the main event that any cryptoinvestor awaits after sales. That is why IEO is much better than ICO, and is so popular now.

In addition, I have seen Binance sell IEO since 2017, but by the beginning of this year when they sold their exchange tokens, they created fomo when all other exchanges followed suit, making many people show now fomo into the IEO

Well from my experience that I have gotten in the crypto space, I don't think it's worth investing in any ICO anymore because the more I see an ICO project as a very good buy, it end up turning out to be something else and I don't think I would ever invest in ICO anymore or even advise anyone to invest in ICO because it would always turn out to be something else, I think you should rather study about IEO or better still STO.

In a word, let me say like this: someone who went crazy with ICOs have another opportunity to go crazy with IEOs. Maybe they feel very satisfied to join both ICOs and IEOs. Let's them freely do what they wanted and waited for. However, with IEOs, it seems that small investors can not join. Those IEOs finished in seconds, crazy.

Exactly, IEO is just an upgrade. It no different from ICO. The same tricks are employed and it's still so prone to scam just like we see different scam projects on ICO now.

That’s positive I suppose ; but I think ieos are dated back to the days of latoken exchange platform
Even though without hypes;

But binance and bittrex brought hypes and ieos are true if we consider successes on bw exchange and dobitrade and tokenomy exchange
Just dyor and participate rightly

It's really hard to get in IEO's sale. You can only depend on luck or good scripts to successfully get your allocation. Anyway, IEO sales is still a top and profitable trend now so that many people keep trying.

Actually, for me, too, there is no difference.  But the real problem of ico companies was that among the total amount of the project there were quite a few scammers.  This really scared off potential investors and that everyone suffered, and developers of other projects and and all participants who took part in it.  may need to find some opportunities to protect investors and thus improve the investment climate in the company's ico market.

The problem with ICOs is that they are not regulated and they can scam investors and leave. With IEOs we have some kind of supervising of the projects and they will not allow their customers to be scammed. It is not only about the package but we have real control mechanism in place.

I also don't invest on ICO, and now on IEO i will wait more to see if some of this project will succeed, but indeed on IEO they say that examines the projects and team before start a IEO.

I think the thing with IEOs is for me just the exchange if they are credible and good enough they might want to Hold their reputation good enough to make better choices in deciding the whole project they put and ofcourse team research and others is basically simplified for you So best choose good exchange when its IEOs

I agreed with you judging by the bitter experience of investing in scam ICOs will definitely calls for diversification of investors portfolio to well secured and regulated investment like IEO which is well coordinated by reputable exchanges with all indications ICOs is becoming a thing of the past with its alarming rate of defrauding investors their hard earned money.
IEOs popularity is soaring lately at-least investors are getting interest in these form of investment with confidence knowing that their funds is safe and well secured.

With the every next arrival of new technologies, the existing technologies loose the demand and hence are elbowed aside in the market. IEO is best as compared to ICO in the current era because the perception about ICO that it is a scam has spread wide and long and IEO is treated as the genuine source of investment with the least risk from an investor’s point of view.

I do not know about the future of IEO but I do know it is going to stay for long as per its popularity among this crypto community still it will be purely depending on how many scams in IEO may decide the actual life time of IEO industry.

Does ICO only stand for making profits for early investors? Like by selling in exchange once the ICO/IEO ended? Price should not be compared when you think about the security. ICO/IEO never guarantees the price, it really depends on the progress of the project and on the people who invested. ICO/IEO is a form of raising funds for different purpose like new startups. The initial cause for an ICO/IEO is to support the purpose and build a good thing in the world. For example, some ICO wants to create a decentralized internet network for global users, regardless of any country.

well yes they are no different from ICO. IEO is just an upgraded version of ICO with little differences made such as security, trust and guaranteed project but even at that, I think the scam projects can still penetrate the system.

I noticed that the usual dump that happens with ICO's recently equally happened with IEO's, the major difference is that one do not have to wait for an exchange listing as it is the case with ICO's, so much confidence is attached to it. IEO's will in turn make ICO's unpopular but only time will tell how long they will last.

Mostly likely they are just the same. We've been know IEO yet but I just thinking that it will be run according to of what ICO's did, may it have a little bit changes but the majority will be the same. We are just looking forward that IEO existence will help to stop from the increasing numbers of scam project and make it possible that investors will feel secured with this.

It may be true that the IEO is a form of upgrade from ICO, because the purpose is the same, namely raising funds. But the IEO here is risking the reputation of the project token behind the big names of Exchange that run it, such as Binance, Bittrex etc., so that it is considered to be far more trusted than ICO. In addition, organizers will not be able to think of deceiving investors because they know that transactions can only be done through the Exchange. That is, there are certain conditions and conditions that must be met before they can use the funds collected successfully. then the risk is smaller than ICO, so we can try it if necessary

Great topic to discuss, well I partly agree with you.

For selling anything in crypto best is to

• create FOMO. ,
• now how do these guys create FOMO is by limiting the no. of people to participate in IEO
• Benefits of IEOs are - The Risk in case of investing in ICOs was completely on users, but in case of IEO some risks would be shared by exchanges on whom the IEOs are happening, since there reputation is also involved, and up to some extent users will at least get returns on there investments and not lose there money completely
• Exchanges will do some initial verification of team and the project before listing the project FOR IEO, that ways users get an additional safety layer
• In context of price, yes they are going to follow the same trend, where FOMO is created right from listing the token till it is out in the market, and it will follow the same pattern of ICOs, pump and dump after some days.

yea I believe your arguments to be honest.  I try to find the very different or should I say special thing concerning the IEO that made it different from ICO but couldn't find. There are no much difference

Yes I agree completely with you, what happened recently when BITTREX cancelled the IEO was a sign of users having some trust that exchanges will keep them safe from frauds.

I agree most of the IEOs are good for short-term profit but since IEO are the new hot thing in the crypto-verse they are really hard to get into during the main offering. I missed so many IEOs from KuCoin and Binance.

But in fact the IEO has many advantages compared to ICO. That's what makes the IEO in great demand. The IEO in popular exchange is certainly one of the most awaited by investors. What I see from the IEO is that the enthusiasm of investors for each IEO is extraordinary. Because of course it will be profitable quickly ieo than ico

IEO promises profit for all investors cause it have different scheme with ico.usually exchanges and developers team will set the rules while investors want to join it.so this rules will prevent token dumping after officially listed.

Somehow, accurate I can say, that's why investors are preferring IEO's rather than ICO's much safer, and there is an assurance that the coin will going to be listed, a bonus is that, they might be listed on big exchanges. But I think in the end, there is not much positive implications we can get if the market gets overloaded with lots of cryptocurrencies.

The only difference between IEO is having a real team behind the project. But whether the project will be successful there is no guarantee whatsoever. IEO simply removes scammers from the market.

I disagree with this, having your ieo crowdfunding in a big exchange does not mean it’s a real team
And it does not guarantee that the project will develop and tokens won’t dump

So there’s not form of guarantees at all

Most investors now see IEO projects as safe haven and would rely more on the ones coming from very reputable projects like Binance, I think this is still the most trusted Platform of them all, because I learnt that despite all the assurance being given by IEP to protect investor’s funds, some few IEO that has occurred through other exchanges late got dumbed after seeing profits.

The only IEO that I have seen so far that people have not dumped and still holding for long while interest is climbing is Binance IEO, because of the strong belief many people have in Binance, and that is why we hardly see any form of dumping on their own personal coin too.

The IEO is the best way for us to invest in the best projects without having to worry about these scammers. In the past 2 months, this trend has been very developed in large exchanges and supported by people in recent times. If you want to earn good profits, you should choose this investment channel because it has very little risk and you can be lucky if you can participate in the best projects in this market.

this is still the beginning of the IEO journey, I think this system is still very vulnerable to fraud, we still need to be vigilant about the IEO which is carried out by several exchanges.

There's already fraud being committed in the name of IEOs just look at yobit even they started IEO and 95% of whatever yobit does turn out to be a big scam lol. That's the main reason I completely stopped trading on yobit.

I think so. but IEO is safer than ICO. Due to some of the following reasons:
  + IEO on major exchanges, confirmed by Exchange
  + Currently, there are many ways to check an IEO project
  + ....

Yeah, I guess IEO become a little upgraded ICO, a combination of ICO and auto-listing on the exchange, it is more convenient and easy for both sides. Also, a big exchange has more powerful tools to make skillful MM.

Thats true. Most ICO are saturated by Scripts, bots all over the place. Exchanges don’t really care as long as they are collecting their own share of the fund. Get the sold out at all cost strategy

It certainly is no different. Just a rebranded process to boost investors confidence and eliminate worry of developers running away with funds collected at ICO. But then, nothing much has really changed in terms of investors still loosing funds post ico. Take a look at Celer, Fetch AI etc

Rather, it is a kind of way to siphon money from people, popularity has already declined.

Despite the fact that IEOs are no different from ICOs, i would prefer investing in an IEO than that of an ICO f9r tue reason being that in an ICO, investors arent sure if they will get the tokens after the sale. IEO are by far better than ICOS imo.

IEOs are even more tricky than ICOs. The exchange and the token issuers manipulate every process of it, who and how much one can participate, the listing price and so on.

IEOs are an upgrade but an important one.
Exchanges are supervising the project development and make it more secure to the investors for investing.

Frankly; yobit has been such a wack exchange with so many vulnerability
But still smart traders would trade there, withdraw and flee

I sold my sphere social token and docademics at yobit and I fled

I used to trade on yobit during my early days on crypto. Still, to date many of my coins that I mined are stuck in the yobit exchange which I can't withdraw because they are too lazy to update the wallet lol. I would never trust any IEO that is ever conducted on yobit.

I think so too, but at least it cannot be as bad as ICO, whatever fraud that will happen in IEO can still be curtailed provided that it doesn’t come through the major exchanges that made people believe in IEO projects. The whole thing is also still in our hands, we can decide to entertain fraudulent activities in IEO or not.

Take for example now, we already know that some scammers might come up with their own exchange to use in scamming people by coming up with IEO projects too, since we already have this thought at the back of our mind, then it means that we have to simply stock to IEO projects from reputable exchanges, if we now take the ones from smaller exchanges, then it should be at our own risk.

There's virtually no substantial difference between the IEO and the ICO. The major difference is the fact that the project running the IEO has been reviewed by the exchange and has a higher probability to be legit. Considering the fact that the exchange reputation is at stake where the project is declared a scam project. ICO are much more risky and there's no guarantee of getting listed.

IEO's gives some "level of comfort" for those planning to participate in it.
The exchange does the KYC for the project and validates the team and viability of the project.
If the exchange did their due diligence before listing the project, then there is some comfort in it.
If the project turn out to be a scam, then the reputation of the exchange who did the ICO will suffer.

Yes, there is no much difference aside the investment security guaranteed and for now, that is still the safest means of protecting our investment by investing in projects that has already been verified by top reputable exchanges that cares about the reputation of their company.

Even in joining IEO projects, we have to stick with the ones produced by these reputable companies because the smaller unknown exchanges can easily be compromised for money. ICO still stand the chance of surviving too but the only way I can think of is if its being regulated, and if becomes regulated, then it will become an anonymous system

Initial Exchange Online is not a trick or even and upgrade, it's just people who are too late to love IEO because many projects turned into scam or struggling to get listed on exchanges, so IEO decrease their risk. In fact, I have seen some projects using this idea to conduct their tokensales couple years ago but just today the idea became hype.

Scam exchanges will get a very funny period with IEO-hot trend. They will easily to reach their objectives, raising funds from community and go away with a fortune. I believe that months later, we will see many scam accusation on scam exchanges, that made successful IEOs, and scam exits later. I don't have intention to invest in IEOs, especially with small, strange exchanges. For big exchanges, small investors are not able to join. Bittrex shown us the fact.

You do not need to worry yourself about participating in the ieos
You can simply get your capital ready; then wait for the dump (it will surely come)
Invest and wait for the next ath then you cash out your profits

Very easy

It's not as easy as you think, some projects are really scam even if the project comes from the IEO not now, we'll see later.
You mean waiting dump price and then buying it then waiting for ATH, hmmm? What if this isn't the same as our prediction? when coins price are dump and we buy it but prices never rise again, it takes a very long time to rise. Do you patiently wait for it? I will not choose this method, wait for the dump and buy then wait for ATH.
this topic talking about IEO is no different from ICO, yes I agree with this, I have posted many times in several threads. this is only an upgrade from ICO+STO=IEO. if ICO you can invest just sending to smart contract address, STO you must KYC to invest, IEO is you must KYC and the very special is the project/coin is ready on market. yes it's new tricks! we will see it later what will happened.

I see your point now
How then can we invest properly ? Perhaps getting in and out during the pump or dump ?

To be more precise, I don't know about that, because I am not the type of person who likes to invest in projects (ICO, STO or IEO, whatever), I am tired because I often lose when investing in a project so I decided to stop.   I prefer to trade with the short-term method.
sorry I can't give you a good answer :(.

It is too early to give up on long term investment, looking at the type of investment it is, the result it will eventually yield are not meant to be seen immediately but will surely do in future if we carefully hold on to it.

What you are doing is also not bad, it is one of the best strategy to use in having patience, and least you will still be getting money from your short term trades, but it still not a bad idea if you still invest in them for long term holding as you cannot predict what will happen in the future, just for one to ensure that any project we are making investment in is a very viable one.

That is right. What differentiates IEO from ICO is the team and the project behind IEO that passes the assessments of the exchanges before the IEO gets conducted. It is due to this reason that they call investment in IEOs safe and risk free. I think that ICO had limited facilities for the crypto startups as they had been banned in many countries and it was not easy to get finds raised by ICOs, thus IEOs came out as lender of the last resort.

It seems to me that in the near future, the choice of all cryptocurrency users in favor of IEO will be made, because it will enable investors not to risk their own funds, and the rest of the process will receive real income from genuine and promising projects.  Until now, the ico market of companies provided only problems with the help of a large number of scams.

I agree with you on this, IEOs are not really different from ICOs it is just an upgrade and the main reason why investors prefer IEO to ICOs is because the exchanges to an extent guarantees the validity of the project, and are less prone to fraudulent activities. I think IEO is just a temporary solution to a long term problem, because as time goes on, scammers will find a way to make their projects pass exchange requirements to launch their tokensale and then scam people. I think regulation is the main solution to this problem.

I completely agree with you that fraudsters are also developing in their activities and sooner or later will find ways out of this situation.  But if the developers of the new project will contribute in a certain amount, this should reduce the attempts of fraudsters to implement their ideas using IEO.

IEO is just a different term than ICO, but if we look at it in another perspective, I think both IEO and ICO are the same. Why I said this?
If we look at it as investment method into companies, they are the same. For ICOs, you invest your money into companies that promise to run their projects. For IEOs, you invest your money into companies that run their exchanges. The common thing here is company, all investors invest in are companies, no matter whatever means they use to invest (IEO or ICO).

Your point are ok but there are still advantages in IEO compared to ICO, in ICO the team behind the project might not be known but in IEO the team must be know and verified if they are trust worthy or not which guaranteed investors funds to be safe and secured. Secoundly the product used case and how the team intend to achieved it are also required by the exchange before the commencement of IEO .

I agree that IEO is just a kind of upgrade from ICO. I pointed out my perpective on ICO and IEO there:
They are both risky to invest, and they are the same because we all invest in companies, and companies (small ones) might all turn out to become scam ones. So, please take are of your capital and your intention to invest into IEOs. There is no one can make sure that companies that own exchanges and run IEOs won't turn into scam companies, and scam exchanges.

it just different scheme.in ico investors need to wait developers team listing their projects that actually often postponed.and investors very annoyed with this condition.meanwhile in ieo investors get certainity about exchanges.

You are very correct dude. IEO is ust an upgrade of ICO. It's only popular exchanges that boost IEO and it doesn't necessarily mean the project is legit or will be successful after that.

IEOs are not really different from ICOs because they are both crowdsale process but it is a very big upgrade on ICOs because they solve most of the challenges of ICOs.
IEOs are better in different ways like
They are more credible than ICOs, because the exchanges will conduct its proper research on the project before launching it. It is more secure as it reduce the risk of sending funds to a wrong wallet or getting pushed. It is more accessible also as you don't need to wait for a long period before you can trade your tokens.

None the less
I think ieos have been a success; it might not be a profit as expected
But it has succeeded and the market has benefitted from it

IEOs can eliminate scam and dubious projects from raising funds via cryptocurrency exchange platforms, and it becomes much harder to scam users with IEOs. Besides, token issuers do not have to worry about the crowdsale security as the exchange is managing the IEO’s smart contract. So far it's been a success story.

The main difference to me is legitimacy of the project. Before doing an IEO on a reputable exchange, the exchange thoroughly checks if the project is legit, if team is real and if they have a product or MVP as they claim. For ICOs, it's a 50:50 chance that the team is scam.

I was also interested in the difference between these two concepts for the development of new projects, but in my opinion they are completely different, because the developers are being put forward very strict requirements from trade exchanges.  Therefore, I can not say that ieos update ico companies.  In addition, it is worth mentioning the fact that the stock exchange is being demolished from the developers of the new company, which is a guarantee for a certain number of investors.

I tend to disagree, as I believe they are both different. IEOs are hosted or promoted by exchanges; and before this is done due diligence is always carried out on the team. The end result of this is that there is no scam. In the case of ICOs, it isn't like that.

I wont deny this kind of fact or observation of yours yet ive been seeing the same thing too and as expected this is just and ICO with having some little twist but overall
it do still goes to the same path on where do ICO go but well it no surprising that these investments will surely drop no matter how good the fund raising or sale it would be
where it would still heading on the same conclusion.

we can’t know for sure how IEO is doing on not huge exchanges. maybe projects just pay to the exchanges more than for listing and new exchanges gladly take the money and do not make any checks

No they are indeed different. In IEOs, investors or users don't pay directly to the team as the exchange takes care of everything.
But one thing is worthy of recognition, which is; that a major exchange is promoting an IEO do not mean it might last long term or that the team is capable of offering all within the whitepaper. This aspect of due diligence is left to the investors.

IEOs are indeed an upgrade version of ICOs but there is some amount of differences between ICOs and IEOs.  with IEOs, a third party is involve in the sales of the coins or tokens and this third party is given the total control over the amount of tokens or coins to be sold during the crowdfund.  This means that the third party ensures that the project is not a scam to just steal money from investors. This is the major significant difference of IEOs from ICOs.

You know, it is even easier to attract people to IEo, people don't even analyze it, they invest in each project, because of IEO tendency.
That's why you should be careful

Let me start by saying both are different.
Secondly, can you compare Binance with Latoken? I guess not. Then what's the reason? In my own opinion, everyone has seen the potential of Binance team and their aim of making sure they offer amazing services while improving everyday. How about Latoken? Can such be said about the team.
IEOs might have a huge chance of selling out on major exchanges because they have what it takes to promote such IEOs. Also, a successful IEOs doesn't mean a successful project on the long run, so we should always endeavour to make our research first.

At least, you don't need to worry that tokens you buy is listed on exchange site or not? The IEOs token always have value. If you have enough smart, good TA you always make profit whatever the IEOs project success or not.

People should know that there will be scam IEOs as well ,there will be projects using IEO to lure victims and that projects IEO might never happen,my advice is for all investors to do better research of any project before investing

If the IEOs are scam, exchangers should be responsible to their members. Exchangers should be know about the project or developers team and project roadmap. I am believe exchanger will carefully before held IEOs on their platform

it is true that ICO and IEO are the same as Innitialing Coin which only distinguishes the person or company that handles it.
if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.

it just using different scheme in crowdfunding.the differences only on exchanges that held crowdfunding.in IEO, developers team directly sell their tokens/coins in market so exchanges as if as escrow in this part.

IEO is a new trend, but I only really believe in IEOs on big exchange like Binance, Houbi, and small exchange. IEOs are not really successful, even the Bittrex IEOs are considered to be failures.

I do not think that holding IEOs will not give 100 percent guarantee that a project will be listed on exchanges thereafter. One thing is that it will only increase changes of exchange listing. There are reports that those projects launching IEOs are still running away scamming investors or are being dumped for want of enough funds to continue the project. So IEOs are relatively good than ICOs.

IEOs are quite different from ICOs . The project get to sold on an exchange which gives the project a bigger chance, let's look at binance launchpad for instance, project who launches on binance have an high rate of being successful,  but ICOs ends up not listing to an exchange or even end up having a shitty prices.

No I think they really different from each other. In ICOs we just research about the team and make our investments, who then delivers or exit scam. While in IEOs the exchange makes the research to authenticate the team and what they are offering before accepting them, so investors just invest at ease.
I think we're most get it wrong is by assuming that once a major exchange promotes an IEO then they will make huge profits, while forgetting there are market factors which also affects IEOs.

I do not agree. They are different from each other, ICOs had its time and from those times we all know how investors were treated; that is most investors do not even get their tokens owing to the way the ICO was arranged. Even some after ICO still go ahead to swap giving unnecessary excuses. The last but not the least is, most ICOs scammed a lot of investors.
But today, taking a glance at IEOs, as you are investing you are getting your token ASAP (trading) thus no room for unforeseen circumstances or scam.
In my own opinion, IEOs are better as it will reduce the rate of fraudulent activities in terms of public sale offerings.

You view's for you.. Personally from this end, I can see a huge difference between IEO and ICO. For instance, most projects that conduct IEOS on several exchanges often times list right away on the designated exchange (s) used during IEO, offering every investors to start trading right away. some ICOs till date never got to the listing stage before they went on dead slumber which they may never eake up from.

I also think there is no such thing as the IEO and ICO. Indeed, only different ways of selling. All the same, it needs a certain process. Maybe IEO has a little more profit because they are after sales, of course, very fast for listings in the market. Maybe that's what distinguishes the IEO and ICO.

An IEO is just safer for the investors because they can dump their coins immediately after the IEO offering. For a regular ICO it can take ages and usually it just ends up on a low volume exchange at best, or in many cases on forkdelta with no buy orders

With such setup the investors followed and buy in to try their luck with this new venture, the moment the IEO finished then it will be decided whether the investors earned or such same fate happen same with investing with ICO's where value fell and nothing left but to sell out with loses and accept the mistakes of investing inside the projects.

IEO is quite different from ICOs cause the exchange will help raise funds for the project for even a shorter while. ICOs can run for weeks or even months while some IEOs lasts for few minutes or so. Some Projects meets hardcap within few minutes in top ranking exchanges after launing IEO.

For me I think ieos are doing the respective task expected of it.
From binance to other exchanges we have seen project attain softcap and also 3x their ieo price after listing.

So far, ieo has been a good source and option of crowdfunding