Bitcoin Forum

Eleareon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2578585)
The-One-Above-All  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400)
Big Boobies talkinDoubleD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2579977)
Hudson-Odoi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2570199)





The-One-Above-All is best with their reply:


Protecting main account with brand new account. Then doesn't want to speak from brand new account at who are they pointing.

I bet 10$ they will create new account to complain that they post from new account to protect brand new account  :D

I noticed it earlier. Sadly it’s not a new thing, sock puppets will always be created to do the dirty work their main account is too much of a coward to do.

Using of sockpuppet simply signifies 2 points.

1. They think that broken part of trust system might be used against them.
2. Their main account has no credibility left and even a "Brand New" accounts look more credible then their main account.

The most of the sockpuppet just afraid and scared that there main account maybe get tagged or they want to hide there opinion with there main account !

I think it's

3. Trolling.

All those sockpuppets provided exactly zero (0) facts or other tangible details as to what the actual problems are, if any. Just some generic rants.

Maybe you're retarded or maybe you just refuse to read. If you gloss over my thread, I literally call someone out for sending somebody 10 merits for a post that doesn't deserve to be merited.
Because it's a friend of yours you turn a blind eye.

It's this reason, in my opinion.  My guess is that these are sockpuppets of some of the better-known Meta trolls that no one is listening to anymore.  Creating new accounts espousing the same crackpot ideas creates the illusion that the trolls have independent support.  I'm not buying it.

My suggestion is to put all the new accounts on ignore if you don't agree with what they're saying--because they're probably not going to change their tune and will keep repeating the same tired old rants against DT, the trust system, merits, and more.  It's all just more noise on Meta.

And this little "emotional" outburst and invitation to "read' is enough to understand who is behind the persecuted newbies that are invading the meta section.


I fell tempted to give each of them 10$ if they promise to follow the path of their Overlord and take a break.

The horror... newbie troll thinks a post doesn't deserve merit. Call the internet cops. Oh wait...

So you got nothing.

Peotecting their accounts? Accounts that is only a MEMBER Rank 🤣 Oh come on, still, can't think of the logic on what they're doing, did they really think newbies has a voice here? (newly created and spouting issues from nowhere)

USERS from The old generation are way too scaredy cats 🤣 too afraid to lost their accounts and also be tagged. Hahaha

I am non native English speaker, so I appreciated your words that help me to learn a new vocabulary, sockpuppet, and its example usage.  :-X

https://i.imgflip.com/2ygyr9.jpg (https://i.imgflip.com/2ygyr9.jpg)

ONE MORE SOCKPUPPET : (similar to mentioned in the OP)

SophieIsla (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580201)

---

QUOTED POST:

With the latest thread they opened in the Meta section, I think this is a legit noob.  :D
(I reported the thread to moderator to move to off topic board.)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131323

yep, their english is too bad. the other ones are all pretty eloquent, that and their general attitude(s) remind me of another Meta troll who has gone missing recently.

That Jet Cash is one culprit, when he puts his right hand up, we can be quite erudite and sensible, but the left hand makes us use naughty sexually explicit words like "tupz". I wonder if he still owns the dot com of that.  I liked my brother JetAid, but he hasn't been very helpful lately, and there is much Jet about him.

Mind you - Jet Cash isn't becoming a bit obsessed with crypto, and he's turning his back on cash. It's all those nasty dirty notes, he'd much rather have some nice clean virtual assets that don't smell of coke.

Yes, but I think he would be banned soon.

He is paralizing posts. This makes me inclined to think he is a noob for sure.

---

Copied:


From:


Source: https://antivirus.comodo.com/blog/comodo-news/detect-remove-bitcoin-miner-virus/

JetCash explained what happened a few posts below how it came to the post being rewarded with 10 merits.
Ask yourself what is his motive in abusing the merit system in that way? He is a Legendary rank here, doesn't wear a signature and is not participating in any campaigns. He has several alt accounts, which is not against the rules and anyone is allowed to have them. All of them Member rank (I think) and none of them are in any campaigns either.

If he is not using his main account for profit, which could earn him the biggest payouts and probably five times more than a Member account, why would he be meriting his unknown alts, friends or selling his merits - I am not sure what exactly you are accusing him to do.

So without foul language, what exactly is the problem with JetCash?
 

He did not explain why he decided to give his pal merits just because he asked for them.

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4661300.msg49692389#msg49692389


I see merits given to this initial post. I see no PROOF than any of these accounts that are being accused of being sock puppets are sock puppets. May I see the proof.

It is the double standards of you and your friends here which there is clear proof of.


This is an accusation with no proof. You can not claim every new account that posts something you do not like is a sock puppet or alt account without evidence.

Why it now looks to me they all are the alt of a single person whose rants are lengthy post are missing now from Meta.
Surprisingly that poster did not posted in past couple of days.

Exactly thats what i thought yesterday mayself too.

4 New Accounts registered only a few days and 4 diffrent complains that all have done by the one User who havnt posted the last days !

Where is Cryptohunter ?  that should be some Users he can discuss his opinions !!!    :D

Why it now looks to you all alt presented single rant person who missing meta now?
Surprisingly I look you didn't understanded your requires proof to insist on makes allegations?
If you must damaged my eye with your broken Englisher accusations please stop spamming your signature and getting paid to do it.
Unless you have some proofs that any of this accounts have alt account then stop claims that they are alts.

Which member did not posted in couple past days?

I've tagged all of them. This reeks of cryptohunter && quickscammer tactics. Obviously untrustworthy. I will not censor myself because some rando-first world pajeets think they can win using these pathetic methods.

The one whom you knew was banned even though his ban isn't public (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5130998.msg50587536#msg50587536) and therefore there's no way you could have known he was banned unless you are him. That member. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110)

4. When you are evading the ban and main account cannot post due to ban .(One of the possible reason)

Definitely CH, uses too many words/terms that nobody (rarely anybody) else does.



(dozens of usages of whilst, if not hundreds)



(both posts are about sig campaigns using the term cream off)



(shadiest of escrows)

This was also a giveaway:


It was funny to see CH try their hardest to keep their words to a minimum but ultimately fail in their last post.

In addition, the new name is entirely fitting for how they see themselves.

Edit:

Holy crap CH is banned!(?)!


Quoted for future posterity:

That's a very compelling case for a sub 80 iq.

It is a shame that cryptohunter was banned. I want to confirm that  he was a great inspiration to myself, that said I am not crytohunter. Let's
keep to the things we can prove.

You are not notildah as cryptohunter would say. You bought his account. This is likely since you are begging for 0.02 btc loans very recently. You are notildah as cryptohunter correctly mentioned. He was a fantastic member and a sad loss to this community. A true legend.

I would like video proof that I am an alt of someone as moronbozo claims in required.

I just choked laughing.


Well uh, thanks?  :-\

Don't worry, I'm done here. If I see Nutildah I'll tell him Not Cryptohunter said "Hi".

Come now, if you're going to pretend not to be an alt of someone, the least you could do is invent new insults:

Teamsters Internet SEctor, Big Boobies talkinDoubleD and Nigerian CocoPalm Farmer are probably the same user.

People need to stop feeding trolls. Maybe any Newbie account spouting the same old nonsense should just be given the silent treatment. I'm sure we could get the merit mafia regulars to agree to it but there's too many sig spamming shitposters who are more than happy to chime in for it to be truly effective. Shadowbanning works wonders for trolls though. When their bait doesn't catch they soon realise they're wasting their time.


I laughed out loud at moronbozo. Was cryptohunter actually banned? He's not currently so must have been given a short one if so.

I will just leave this here...

This is fun. I wonder if anyone else noticed that snippet, after I indicated it was the words of my inspiration cryptohunter?
Agent foxpoop.

You missed notildah? Also there is one that starts out with a f  in this very post.

This is not a proofen fact, you need video evidence of cryptohunter typing on this very keyboard. Ask moronbozo.

I have no alt account, so stop making false accusations. I will not ask you again before I make another reputation thread asking why persons are permitted to continue accusing persons, casting them in a negative light with no proof at all. I hope persons realize this is unfair and ridiculous.

So you have been lurking around Bitcointalk for quite sometime, becoming quite familiar with the current forum politics and just a couple of days ago decided to create an account? I suppose that is possible, but doesn't pass the occam's razor test. Perhaps you are not a CH alt; especially since a moderator already confirmed that if CH was banned, it's already over. However, it's quite likely you are someone's alt here.

I still maintain that the one that starts with v was better.

In that case, I will not ask you again (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5130998.msg50587891#msg50587891) how you knew cryptohunter was banned when nobody other than himself could know that. ::)

occam's razor informed me

I don't know why you are quoting my post and asking me to post proof of something, I am not the OP of this thread.

The post you linked is not the post we were talking about, it was this one:
This is the post you had problems with because it received 10 merits and JetCash explained how that happened.
My initial reply is based on you accusing JetCash for whatever it is you think he is guilty of for the post I quoted.
 

I'm a gnat's wedding-tackle away from giving the guy another 20 merits for the post just to piss off the whingers. Would that count as merit abuse, or would it be frock puppet abuse? :)

Sure, no problem: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400;sa=showPosts.

Is it possible that a direct ban from the theymos won't show in whatever dashboard you moderators have?
Or he is just playing with us to have our hopes destroyed tomorrow morning?


 Seeing how his attitude has changed in the past few weeks I'm not sure if he will be pissed off about this.
In his twisted mind, he might see it as a victory where he has made you do something through his well-planned schemes ....
The only way to deal with a nut is to use a hammer, nothing else works...

Is this proof of your sig spamming? 

I see no proof that any accounts here accused are alts?

Video evidence as required by yourself when operating your alt account zorroback.?

I bow to your judgment. :)

Now back to trying to understand penetration testing with Kali Linux.

Just to inform you that my previous post doesn't count as signature spam as it has less than 100 characters. You have one "spam card" less.
Ok, here you go: https://youtu.be/f5HX67WqUSY?t=17

Please mute video, I swear they look like they are ranting about something.

you called people who criticizing your group suckpuppets and you called yourself good ones.hHmmmm?

obviously cryptohunters alts. good thing they seem to be as verbose as he is. need some posts more and tspacepilot's scripts can be used to validate this claim: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171059.0

That was an epic thread.

I agree 100%. Some of them he's doing a better job at pretending not to be himself than others. I'm setting a policy of ignoring all of them from here on out.

Sockpuppet detected!  ::) ;D

His logic was flawed, and was not based on any kind of science.

Further, since all of the information used to make the determination is public, it would be trivial for someone to impersonate someone they are trying to make look bad.

https://media.tenor.com/images/a3e2e51f2731670cba100b68f2a71ef3/tenor.gif

Fuck off CH, you absolute weapon of a man. I’m using the term man loosely there but come the fuck on!
Do you expect anybody to seriously think these sock puppets aren’t you behind them with posts like the above.

You’re becoming a joke here now.

You might as well have posted the above from your main account. An inspiration HAHAHAHAHA.

I need to go & have a lie down.

I don't think it's trivial but of course you'd say that.

But it's downright impossible that cryptohunter would be watching this and would resist posting anything for a week while someone is impersonating him to make him look bad. He used to explode all over Meta on the slightest pique.

I think there is a good chance he is temporarily banned, but this is speculation.

Regardless of if he is banned, he appears to want to improve his standing with the administration after this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5128910.msg50490372#msg50490372) thread and after theymos warned him that he is close to getting banned. It was transparent in that thread that someone is/was putting in effort into trying to get him banned  ::)

It doesn’t surprise me that he is trying to lay low. IMO, he doesn’t want to be excluded from the forum.

---

Considering CHs post history is public, someone impersonating him could continue prewritting a number of posts until there are sufficient similarities between what is written and how CH writes.

If CH is being impersonated, it wouldn’t be the first time someone tried to impersonate someone to make them look bad.

There is very little chance of that unless you're implying that Mrs Clinton is lying:

I don't know why you think why this word 'sockpuppets" isn't familiar with those alt account owners. Its really annoying to see multiple account handling by same owner. These alt accounts holders always connect with spamming, merit abuse, trolling any many more unexpected activities on forum. Expecting good works from them is nothing but a waste of time.

I didn’t see where he said definitely that CH was not banned.

Perhaps you should consider to stop twisting others words to fit your narrative...

Anything else I can help you with today?

How about helping by being honest and admitting you use sock puppets like ScumBuster? I don't have video evidence, so it fails the moronbozo threshold of proof, like he is not zorroback. Sock puppets seem to be hot topics when dt members are not controlling them all..... or are you?

ScumBuster is not my alt nor would it make any sense for me to use alts for something I already do a lot with my account, i.e. report posts to moderators. I have also admitted numerous times that I'll be reporting your violations so you can simply pin it to me directly without this contrived proxy-blame.

On the other hand, your use of sockpuppets for ban evasion (if you're banned) or to fake a ban (if you're not) is inherently dishonest and intentionally disruptive to the forum.

This was your trollfeed for the day, make it last, winter is coming.

When things appear not to makes sense, it is then the most untrustworthy thrive and flourish.  I will not violate any rules, so that would seem unlikely to happen. This" it does not make sense" is a common defense of the guilty.

How can I be banned? I have not broken any rules? I will not be banned unless I do. Please bring video evidence, if you must continue making, such frivolous accusations.
I had heard it said, that it was perhaps you that was dishonest and untrustworthy? something regarding not paying for mining equipment and getting doxed ? again no video proof, so I will not say that alone is enough to convince me of your corrupt and untrustworthy heart.
Although, combined with your observable double standards,  support of liars, scammers and probable extortionists, then I don't think using sock puppets is the worst of your actions.  Just be honest suchmoron, you obsess over the true legend cryptohunter because he broke you down publicly and made you look foolish many times, then demonstrated you are largely a bag of air with no real achievements for all of your snitching and your most original thought inspiring post is not something you would even dare to present for us to laugh at. Don't be a bad sport, just accept that the $2000000000 USD legend was your superior in every conceivable way. If you are responsible for his ban, then you can add that to your list of net negative actions. We will make sure that he is never forgotten. We are here to stay.

It is not  the poster, but the content of the post on it's own merit, that one should take note of. The posts individual value should be measured apart from its author.
Stop crying my little DT members, just change your abusive ways and stick to red trusting scammers and those you can build a strong case are likely to scam. That is your purpose, not to control the free speech on this board, so that SOME people may feel required to hide from retribution their main accounts when speaking out against unfair and unjust actions.

@suchmoon - Buddy, I think it’s best if we all just stop conversing with IT. CH thrives on attention, I’ve been guilty of it myself many times but we need to stop feeding the trolls.

I think it was The Pharmacist who created a thread suggesting we all stop replying to CH, Thule etc. It’s what they love, to be the centre of attention.

Let’s starve them of what they crave, attention. It just makes them worse by giving them what they want.

New keywords added to list.

Trying... so tempting... it's like a chocolate-glazed strawberry-filled doughnut with sprinkles...

As in you want to bite into it, tear it apart until it’s no more?

;)

Adding "Keywords" to the list of words you are spamming, along with your signature. Moronbozo.

@snitchmoon,

Look, you will never get your hands on Bradley Cooper with an ass filled with that junk food. I'm not going to be helping you burn those calories off, so no point begging me.

Holy cow, I went into a diabetic seizure just reading that.  Can I have another?

I'm really grateful you didn't go the licking route...


Take the whole box, the calories conspiracy is nonsense anyway:

https://i.snag.gy/X0YTZS.jpg

You know you’d tongue punch that shit, suchmoon ;)

I’m kidding, I’m kidding :D

I think I found CH’s PC desk, some weird stuff at the side of it.

https://i.ibb.co/FVx7wwW/E2-CCEEFA-C755-43-C1-B05-D-B438-F534627-D.jpg

This forum is becoming a joke because those with the most control over it treat it like one. Enjoy the lulzors, because that is going to be about all this place is worth.