Is cryptohunter spamming forum?

[DeathAngel]

TLDR

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

Too Lame , Definitely Retarded

[1715158393]

1715158393

[1715158393]

1715158393

[sirazimuth]

TLDR

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

How about this....?

[suchmoon]

How about this....?

Lovely...

Thou lumpish dread-bolted ruffian

[Quickseller]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

[suchmoon]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

You're right, making fun of someone's incoherent rants is such inappropriate bullying. We should instead accuse them of having a pill addiction or being a pedophile.

[Flying Hellfish]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

[cryptohunter]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

If mods are not impartial then why should anyone trust them at all.

You are not participating in a discussion at all. I see you presenting no evidence or examples of my trolling, no presentation of any evidence of any false information that I am proliferating, and no attempt at all at discussing the reasons to open 3 different threads on 3 separate discussions or anything at all about those 3 important threads that only seek to establish some fair and transparent guidelines that everyone can follow.

All I said to you is that I have noted you are spamming the same sigs as the observable liars, scammers, probable extortionists and other observable scoundrels here and gladly accepting 20 merits for saying I should leave the board. You are not impartial at all and I never even really talked to you before.

You are just trying to join in with your pals on their witch hunt based soley on the fact that I will NOT stop mentioning when it is relevant and on topic that they have observable double standards and seek to punish persons for deeds less damaging and less serious than they or their friends have observably committed.

Also I feel that people of admin level should not have been here years and still need to spam gambling sigs to get some btc dust. That tells me after 2 huge bull runs they are very likely to be poor in their judgement in this community here and could be jealous of successful members. Also being of low net worth certainly makes you more vulnerable to corruption and back handers. This is speculation but the other option is that you are  just greedy so that is no better really.

You like ALL of these people including lauda came after ME, and started attacking me first. Trace back the threads I was not attacking anyone until they turned up calling me a liar and all kinds of false accusations with ZERO grounding over and over even when I asked them to present their evidence. Then I told them if you keep doing this over and over to me I will encourage others to look at your past history. They then red trusted me and next their OBSERVABLE colluding pals all from the same extortion scheme and many other instances they can be observed ganging up all gave me more red trust. I say it is not fair and I don't accept this scam tag.

You as a moderator side with these peoples actions. Then you should be removed from your position. I mean not only do you side with  them in private you openly start attacking me when I never spoke to you before?

Stop crying when I simply note in public some observable events about you. At least it is not a false accusation with zero reasoning or grounding behind it.

How about out of the blue I come on your threads and say its  better if you leave, and start calling you crazy and will not present any evidence at all?? 

Anyway I don't want you to agree with me, just mind your own business and stay out of it.

You will never find me attacking anyone first here. I present observable events and people come and attack me fair enough, but I keep presenting those events anyway.

Anyway I have plenty of opponents here so one more makes zero difference to me. However, don't expect me to react any different to you that I do to them just because you are admin, you really should be able to explain clearly your actions and be held accountable more than a normal member.

So it is up to you. I never heard of you before much and I have no personal experience with you, so just don't come sniping and jabbing at me and then no need for me to reply to you at all, and if you don't like my long posts then you can simply never read one again. I have never read any of yours until you came looking for me AFAIK.

Things are not going to get LESS scummy if mods are supporting observable scum. Try to understand that.

[Flying Hellfish]

Blah blah blah

Thank you for the compliments, I am glad you have come to your senses and agree with everything I have ever said!

[cryptohunter]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

You're right, making fun of someone's incoherent rants is such inappropriate bullying. We should instead accuse them of having a pill addiction or being a pedophile.

Says the snitchy scum that moans about others minor infractions whilst enabling and ensuring those that have observably lied, supported scams, trust abused, observably tried to extort people by harassing their parents (haha what scum), sneakily and greedily used sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust ....GET ON DT1. You are a disgusting fool who I have crushed so many times in debate you must have zero shame to even keep posting here. You must love being crushed in public.

I am likely going to dedicate a thread to all of your most stupid statements and self defeating blunders.

@cryingdumbfish

great reply.... I would have to be reckless to face you in open debate in public again. lol

I see nothing in this thread other than groundless false accusations regarding all kinds of trumped up shit with ZERO evidence supplied even after I called them to present it many times. Bunch of toothless rancid hags all shrieking around flailing their arms crashing into one another as I bitch slap them about with observable events and facts.

[Quickseller]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken. It is probably not appropriate at all for a moderator to be doing the same at all all in any public thread.

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants. If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Read your own post and feel free to ignore me asshole!

I am also a user of this forum and to my knowledge being staff does not preclude me from participating in any discussion I feel like commenting on.  If it is I missed that memo.

It isn't my "job" to hold anyones hand and make them feel all warm and fuzzy, if I see a stund cunt I am likely to call them a stund cunt!  It is my "job" to clean up shit in the P&S sub, that's it.  Perhaps if people would use their own fucking brains instead of looking at title or trust or merit things would start to get a little less wild west scummy around here, I know I know I'm a dreamer at heart!

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

I have no problem dealing with your outbursts and it doesn’t trigger me when someone disagrees with me or says something I don’t like.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional. 

[Flying Hellfish]

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional.  

When I step over the line I assume theymos is a big boy and will let me know.  BTW what does my "attitude" have to do with my ability to clean up shit in P&S LOL.

When Cryptohunter stops posting like a mouth breathing goldfish people will stop making fun of them.

[Quickseller]

You are absolutely allowed to participate in the forum as a moderator but that doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want — you are held to a certain set of standards as a moderator.

When you are posting anywhere in the forum you are wearing a ‘staff’ tag and as such it should not be unreasonable to expect you to be professional. 

When I step over the line I assume theymos is a big boy and will let me know.  BTW what does my "attitude" have to do with my ability to clean up shit in P&S LOL.

I am voicing my opinion on the matter.

I am not referencing your "attitude" I am referencing your professionalism, or lack thereof towards other forum members you are supposed to have authority over when they post in your section, and that you have influence over everywhere.

The above does not directly affect your ability to "clean up shit" in your section, it reflects on the forum itself via your 'staff' tag, and calls into question your ability to handle issues in a mature/impartial way, including issues within your section.

[marlboroza]

If you don’t want to deal with his rants, your choice are to ignore him (including not publicly talking about him), or put up with the rants.

Why should we ignore spam?

If you want to chastise him, you should expect a response.

Excuse me, but why these rants started? Isn't it because she went full off topic in another thread which has nothing to do with her and things she mentioned in that post, admin deleted her post and she start ranting around and spamming forum with some crap?
Why should we ignore this?
Theymos explained her why post was removed and then she start to create threads one after another like there is some issue going on but there isn't any issue except her spamming and trolling.

Reports are unhandled, should I create thread in meta to ask why? 

When your TLDR is still TOO FUCKING LONG...

I actually read it and she said something about "Alice" whoever that is and whatever that means and some things that she is repeating again. Some off topic crap again, nothing new, really.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I am no expert, but I don’t think it is best to be bullying a forum member in a meta thread complaining about rules allegedly being broken.

This isn't bullying.  Bullying would be picking on a member who hadn't started a complete, forum-wide shitfest first.  And if cryptohunter can't take a thread like this, then he shouldn't be attacking DT members, Theymos, the trust and merit systems, and everything else he's been on a crusade against for the past few months. 

I also don't see why a staff member can't have a strong opinion about this, either.  It's not like they have to be completely impartial--and this isn't even the section Flying Hellfish moderates.

The bottom line is that cryptohunter's posts, threads, and all of his arguments have become stale.  They're repetitive and annoying and the only thing left to do after rebutting all of his points is to laugh at him, since he won't go away.  That's the only thing you can do aside from putting him on ignore, which I've done, but I still can't help reading the replies of others to his posts--so what else can one do?  I've no sympathy for him and see no reason to defend him against other members who just want to take the piss out of him.

[cryptohunter]

This is exactly what I mean and exactly why I created the 3 threads, thanks for demonstrating again the clear need for them once again.

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.
They still use these false accusations in light of

a/ they can't demonstrate any examples when called on to produce many many times
b/ they have been caught red handed sneakily using puppet accounts to racist troll sig spam for btc dust themselves haha but advocate others be banned whilst they enjoy DT positions

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post
b/ it is rather because of ALL of reasons I am discussing in the 3 threads I started. It is to establish some transparent guidance for all members.

3/ pharmacist aka Huge Black Woman states that all of my points (including those on merit and trust)

a/ are old and stale (well these are ongoing very important points, shall we just keep talking about cycled merits on ALL threads here and forget improving the forum for REAL in a transparent and fair way for all members) and never mention the observable untrustworthy deeds you have all committed again? haha old and stale

b/states there has been successful rebuttals/ refutations made (NONE EXIST and he does not present them obviously)

c/claims that "taking the piss" is the only thing that remains to be done, when the only thing they do do is present false accusations then refuse to back them up with any evidence or examples. You are merely through force of numbers trying to collude and make it appear that there is strong consensus that your points are true when any person can see that none of you can produce any evidence... .where as I can

4/ again all I say I see these people doing is trying to dole out punishment to those guilty of lesser crimes than they have committed  and those they support are observably guilty of whilst cycling merits and all including each other on DT when they are observably untrustworthy themselves. Their double standards are sickening and they are spamming their "highly paid sigs" whilst they get to exercise their self awarded powers to punish others often merely on a " hunch".

5/ every single point I have made since coming to meta STANDS there has been no successful refutations to ANY of my central points. They are simply trying to defend the systems that allow the most observably untrustworthy and dangerous people here to grasp power and punish others for lesser offences....whilst ensuring they cream off the best sig campaigns via their pals campaign managers projects and mods seem to be joined to the same projects are backing them and their foul deeds against honest members.

So dummies - present the trolling, the incorrect information I am spreading, the points I have made where there has been a successful refutation conclusively presented, and also if you like your most original thought inspiring posts that got you your big bags or merit that would be good for a laugh too. How about your largest achievements since joining this board?

We will get NOTHING presented again. Really you are just demonstrating how stupid and foolish you are.  I have no idea why you have any merits, or a DT position at all. I can see clearly why you are a bunch of broke ass fools though haha.

[marlboroza]

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post

Yes it is. You spammed threads because theymos removed your off topic reply.

sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account
sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers

racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up

The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers

sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust
DT1

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

Do you use text spinner or something?

Can you please stop spamming "keywords" (and some other words) over and over again?

[cryptohunter]

1. they still reference things like my spamming and trolling but are unable to provide any examples.

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

2/ they just speculate on why the 3 threads were started as if they know.
a/ it is not because theymos deleted my post

Yes it is. You spammed threads because theymos removed your off topic reply.

sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer Huge black woman.
racist trolling from your  sig spamming sock puppet account
sock puppet racist trolling sig spammers

racist trolling sig spamming puppet accounts, lying, pushing scams, all meriting each other, all voting each other on dt and all ganging up

The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers

sock puppets to racist troll sig spam for btc dust
DT1

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

Do you use text spinner or something?

Can you please stop spamming "keywords" (and some other words) over and over again?

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

[marlboroza]

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

"keywords"

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

Don't worry, I will make a list of all keywords when I will have enough time to go trough your shitposts.

At the moment, I am adding to that list:

observable events ^[1]
fool (fool deeds)
truth (speak the truth)

where are the examples of

I thought you have read quoted post, anyway, here you go again:

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

[1]Oh...

[cryptohunter]

Huge Black Woman
racist troll sig spam
cycling merits
btc dust
DT
highly paid sigs
best sig campaigns
their pals

"keywords"

spamming "key words"  ah i see...haha

1/ I did not start these 3 threads for that reason. They encompass many more scenarios than that single example which is possibly just part of the prior precedents set one. Please try to stop demonstrating you are completely stupid.

2/ spamming does not essentially mean using the same TRUTHFUL descriptions describing valid and on topic observable  events over different time periods. Yes you must find different words to describe our observable foul deeds and double standards or you must be banned for spamming....hahahaha

You seem to be moving the goal posts initially it was am I spamming because of the 3 threads. Now it is because I have use some of the same terms to describe observable events. haha fool.

3/ so this is the best you can bring??? where are the examples of

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

haha I used some of the same words to describe some of the same observably untrustworthy actions of you and your pals. lolololo

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

Don't worry, I will make a list of all keywords when I will have enough time to go trough your shitposts.

At the moment, I am adding to that list:

observable events ^[1]
fool (fool deeds)
truth (speak the truth)

where are the examples of

I thought you have read quoted post, anyway, here you go again:

examples --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110, to be more specific https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110;sa=showPosts

[1]Oh...

This is excellent work moronbozo....

Keep looking, I have used "observable events" 100's of more times than that. You are just seeing merely the tip of an "observable events " iceberg. hehe. I'm actually starting to see a convincing set of evidence building up that I do use the same words often when I wish to describe the same or similar instances. hmmm perhaps you're on to something I mean after you have spent several weeks counting how many times I have used different words.

Then move on to something a little more damning like

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ my shit posts (best define that first)
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

then the rarest of all.

e/the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have

I think you will find it is you that is the net negative shit poster and supporter of "observable" scammers, liars, and other dirt bags. Now get back to counting my words before A-E.  This thread that you created is a shit post. It serves to prevent the board debating and establishing a set of sensible guidelines for dealing with the scenarios that are described within and subsequently how we can view and react to those that operate inside and outside of the guidelines that are determined to be optimal.

They are open debates... nothing more. That is what forums are for. I see you as grossly net negative by trying to prevent it and turn it into another witch hunt. You likely do not have the capacity to realise my true intentions here but just try not to worry about that and accept that a force for good in terms of fairness and equality to all members.

[marlboroza]

a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.

shut up moronbozo ... you just get more stupid daily.

[...]
a/ the incorrect and false information I am presenting over and over
b/ the trolling examples
c/ my shit posts (best define that first)
d/ my pushing for any other agenda that introducing a fair and equal system for all.
[...]
e/the examples of your original thought provoking posts worthy of all this merit you have

What the...? You probably missed this and this again.
You can't really expect anyone to quote your Artamène post history and post all examples of your spamming trolling rant.