Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 02:59:39 PM



Title: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 02:59:39 PM
~snip~

Other than leaving red trust for Yobit and just one Yobit signature promoter (because of his condescending conduct and deliberate misdirection not failure to justify why he was a die-hard Yobit promoter), I did not leave feedback for Yobit signature promoter.

In my view anybody promoting a scam are guilty of being a scam too simply by association but more important than that is the view I hold they are most probably more ignorant than anything else therefore I do not leave red trust for that reason alone. Had signature promoters investigated the facts fully then most would probably not participate in those scam campaigns.


When it comes to Yobit, I have made my position/opinion clear in several places and would like to re-iterate it here before going further.

In my case, for the sole reason of promoting Yobit, before starting this thread I had given red trust to just one user: Yobit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=406594)

I might have tagged other users for other reasons and stated them but never tagged a user just for showing Yobit banners. It just so happens that Yobit forms part of the conversation here some users mentioned and alluded to below promote it. Everybody has their own view on this issue and those similar to it but in my personal opinion if a user is promoting Yobit they should not deserve a tag on the basis of that alone.

Whether promoting a Yobit banner or any other banner it should not warrant a tag unless there are exceptional circumstances. I have not come across any exceptional circumstances that fit that description yet except for user Vispilio because he has openly stated he is promting a banner in full knowledge it is a scam and that is unacceptable. The banner he promotes could be from LLC1 or LTD2 or Company3, it would make no difference but it just so happens to be a Yobit banner.

It was only because of the sheer ferocity and aggression that Yobit was being defended by a some users I was not familiar towards end of December 2019/early January 2020 that I took a closer look at what was going on. It seemed that some of the members had been part of a merit abuse and fake trust circle which was designed to help them to DT1. Some had more evidence against them than others whereas some were able to semi-distance themselves.



wolwoo's merit source desire: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205906.0
Have you seen Yobit's new signature design?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211902.0
Yobit campaign participants and supporters: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212036.0
*Reference topic: Why are these members excluded on trust lists?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098623.msg53430210#msg53430210

*This one has special significance because Loyce clearly shows wolwoo being part of a trust circle BUT he is trusted by DT member: Vispilio

In posts from the links at no point did Vispilio make any positive intercession considering he has a special relationship with wolwoo and some others from their local language boards. The general flow of the posts linked above he seemed to egg-on subtly by default backing wolwoo in his aggression and profanities which in turn showed that this person is not suitable for any responsibility as far as this forum is concerned.

His personal insults towards myself or other members are not the issue here, though it sheds some light on his mentality but I want to ask the community if someone making the following statement is an appropriate person to be either Merit Source or DT and ask if you think he is behaving in a manner that is fit for either role. For me this statement from Vispilio raises concerns:


Yobit controls when they stop supporting a coin, and Yobit knows that this will hurt many of its investors. Without any moral conviction they will move onto their next token, and promote that with 10% interest, and the whole process starts again. They'll continue supporting it until they believe it'll earn more by promoting a new, and exciting token. Investors will try to jump in early this time because they know the coin will be dropped eventually, and investors will be looking to get rid of the coin until it eventually reaches 1 satoshi, and no one buys it.

Any investor who sees an instrument / scheme / crypto is offering 10% daily should be responsible enough to walk away knowing that such an interest rate cannot be mathematically sustained without total devaluation of the traded product...

On the other hand, offering interest rates for BTC holdings is a legitimate benefit, which the invest box also seems to provide, and no one has come forward in years that Yobit has stolen from the accounts or anything criminal like that; thus the exchange's continued popularity...

Not to mention there are free coins and various other bonuses offered by Yobit, obviously other promotional tactics to market their brand...

It shouldn't be a categorical offense to promote an exchange that is providing some valid services, simply because some other fringe products it offers are highly likely to lead to investors losing money...

So according to Vispilio it is completely acceptable to promote a company that has some products and services that he himself accepts are a fraud/scam. The reason he cites is because the company also has some products which cannot be confirmed as scams therefore it is perfectly fine to promote it.

This raises a fundamental problem so if a user knows/accepts/states he is promoting a scam but defends either the scam itself or his promoting of it - or even more shamefully if a user implies investors are to blame if they get scammed and become victims because they should be responsible enough to walk away knowing various interest rates cannot be mathematically sustained (ie ponzi) - but will still display the banner promoting the scam, then that sort of thinking is clearly is at odds with the morals and values that any sensible user should have let alone DT or Merit Source member should have.



Furthermore the following are not examples of how anybody with DT really should be behaving, I think playing the "race" card and shouting "victim" is one of the lowest forms of behaviour that any user could stoop to but using that as an excuse for misdirection, diversion and deflection tactics when either Merit Source or DT ranked makes it even more ridiculous than it should be:

Please don't involve me in your little DT games, it's extremely boring. If you have a problem / extreme butthurt with Turkish users gaining representation,

take it up with theymos instead of employing NPC trolls to do your dirty work like your newly anointed zealous thrall JollyGood above... Good Luck


I don't have a problem with Turkish users, nice try making it about nationality again. A great example of flawed judgment exhibited by a yet another DT1 member.

I have a problem with you playing that card, as well as with idiots in general getting into DT1 so I will point that out whether you like it or not.



Here again Vispilio re-iterates that Yobit is a scam, he calls it a pyramid scheme yet he justifies promoting it by simply saying that users "knowingly chasing these kinds of things, looking to get in early and get out before the scam falls apart". This again is conduct not appropriate for a user with any responsibility attached to them.


How much have you personally invested into InvestBox and the non-scammy X10 token? With 10% daily profit, think of how much money you'll make! I bet that everyone here defending the X10 token has not purchased any themselves nor would they ever consider it, knowing the dump scheme that will happen. Random people clicking your signature won't know about that and might think it's actually legitimate.

edit: Or, would you, in good faith, recommend that someone invest into X10 token for 10% daily interest?

This point is pretty much moot now because they changed their signature, but I'd still like to hear a response.

(and before someone resorts to personal attacks, yes I've used ChipMixer and I've bet over 15 BTC at sportsbet.io)

No one in his right mind should invest in X10, it's obviously a pyramid scheme.

Yet there are people knowingly chasing these kinds of things, looking to get in early and get out before the scam falls apart...

Like the price of X10 briefly went from 22 sat to 30 sats yesterday, someone could have bought in, made 10% overnight, and cashed out at around 20% higher for overall profits of 30% in 1 day...

I wouldn't recommend anyone to trade this way or advertise ponzis, but the fact remains there are people who are convinced they can beat the schemers / gambling sites / sports bookies at their own game, and they deliberately pursue rigged products...



Here Vispilio makes another absurd comment because there is no comparison between Chipmixer and Yobit. As far as I know, Chipmixer has no scam allegations against it but he himself calls Yobit a scam yet still promotes it:

Well, at least this discussion has opened our eyes to the users who have morals, and those that are willing to lie down their morals for gain. The moderators, and Yahoo's opinion matter not, and even theymos' doesn't matter on this particular issue. However, what you decide for yourself does matter.

You either choose to continue earning a good living with Yobit's shenanigans or you keep your respect. I don't think you can keep both. Also, no one here is blaming Yahoo, and I'm not sure why users are even mentioning that fact. No one here is calling out Yahoo. Its quite clear that Yobit have terrible customer support, and communication even with someone they have hired.

Considering that its a law to offer customer support here in the UK, and they are willing to put that so low on their priority list speaks volumes. The whole company is unprofessional, and all they care about is earning a quick buck as evidenced by this InvestBox shit.

No matter what one's moral views are, a BTT user should not be penalized for promoting one of the most well known crypto exchanges.

Many crypto exchanges are engaging in unethical practices like fake volume, pump & dump schemes, shitcoin IEO's, etc. and yet they are still highly popular because they also manage to fulfill some really valuable duties like market efficiency and liquidity.

As numerous users have already noted, an analogy can be drawn between promoting Chipmixer and Yobit's InvestBox:

you can choose to be a smart investor and use Investbox to make 0.1% on your BTC monthly without ever investing in any of the shit coins, or you may choose to be a gambler and pursue some short term wild gains in the massively inflated shitcoins (similarly Chipmixer service can be used for illicit activites, yet the marketer cannot and should not be held accountable for a potential abuse of a service that has other net benefits to the ecosystem)...

I agree the wording of the signature can be revised to be more honest, but trying to frame hundreds of Cryptotalk / Yobit participants would be one of the most harmful things this forum can do to herself and its user base...



I wish to re-iterate the tag for I left for Vispilio and the issues mentioned in this thread are based purely on the basis of the way Vispilio conducts himself and is not based on him being part of any local language group or anything else. There is no conspiracy against him or the group that he holds in high regard, some of which were dropped by DT members after accusations of merit abuse and fake trust circles came to light.


In simple terms, if a user promotes a scam but does not believe or accept it is a scam, then it is up to the community to present evidence to show them they are wrong.

If however a user openly states he knows he is promoting a scam and then fault blames victims for getting scammed then that clearly shows the user is unsuitable for any responsible role.



I ask the community, do you think it appropriate for any Merit Source or DT member to to be in a position of either trust or responsibility after reading the statements outlined?

A final comment from Vispilio with a countering view that I cannot see any considerable contributions made by Yobit to crypto space. I do however see a user that is willing to say and do anything to keep getting paid by Yobit to display their banner but probably would dump them in the blink of an eye and start promoting another banner.

~snip~

No one is contesting that the investbox ad was misleading and had ponzi like components, but in the bigger picture, Yobit's efforts are making considerable contributions to the crypto space, amidst a dark extended bearish period when many participants have already surrendered and gone home to drink tall glasses of milk  ;)...


So, should DT or Merit Source members be promoting a known scam? The answer has to be a resounding "no" especially when that member self-admits he is promoting a scam.

This is just one of several examples of how the trust system is not working as it should when users such as Vispilio make it on to DT or Merit Source.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: PrimeNumber7 on January 21, 2020, 04:34:30 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)   

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 04:44:48 PM
Right on cue....  ::)


Mother fucker
Go fuck your self son of bitch



Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 21, 2020, 04:58:12 PM
It's up to DT1 to clean DT. In wolwoo's case, that works just fine: wolwoo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1003533) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1003533)  +2 / =1 / -3) (DT1 (-8) 413 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1003533.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-18_Sat_05.16h/1003533.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wolwoo)).

Merit sources are up to theymos, and as far as I know his application has not been accepted. I can't really judge his Merit sending judgement because I can't read most of the posts, but if his judgement on Trust is a indicator for this, it's not good.

Since scams aren't moderated, I don't think promoting a scam is necessarily a reason to reject a Merit source application. Clear judgement is what's needed though, and anger tantrums aren't a good sign.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: DireWolfM14 on January 21, 2020, 05:01:44 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)   

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.

Yahoo62278 has been a tremendous help to the forum for his participation.  Short of a permanent ban against the Yobit campaigns (no objections here) Yobit will continue find a way to spam the forum.  So far theymos has been unwilling to ban the company from advertising on the forum.  Unless or until that happens, we don't have any better option than hoping yahoo62278 continues in his current roll.



For someone who wants to be a merit source and on Default Trust, don't you think that you should demonstrate better judgement, follow the rules, and lead by example?

Mother fucker
Go fuck your self son of bitch

Forum rules

1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads. [1][e]

2. No off-topic posts.

3. No trolling.

Senin de düşüncelerinin de ta aq
Bilmediğim dilde yazmayın aq çocukları
Sizin de 7 ceddinizin de aq
Al bunu translate yap dür bi tarafına sok 👌 ok

Forum rules

9. Discussions in the main boards must be in english. All other language discussions should be posted in the appropriate Local board.



Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TMAN on January 21, 2020, 05:17:47 PM
Yobit as a whole is cancer, but the user in question isnt spamming or fucking the forum.

Suggesting Yahoo not do the campaign is crazy dude, he is a great manager and is needed if we want to stop all the shitposting pajeets causing us all eyecancer. The only other option is to ban all yobit sigs IMO


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 05:26:44 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)  

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.


I am sorry to highlight it but this thread is not about Yahoo62278 or his management of Yobit campaigns.

This thread is specifically about the manner in which a DT member has claimed he knowingly is promoting a scam and has added at least one merit abuser and fake trust user to his trust list.

I kindly request all to post on topic please. Thank you.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: PrimeNumber7 on January 21, 2020, 05:34:02 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)   

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.


I am sorry to highlight it but this thread is not about Yahoo62278 or his management of Yobit campaigns.

This thread is specifically about the manner in which a DT member has claimed he knowingly is promoting a scam and has added at least one merit abuser and fake trust user to his trust list.

I kindly request all to post on topic please. Thank you.
I guess my point is that I think no one should be promoting YoBit. I am not sure but I think yahoo is on DT.

I don’t think it is unreasonable to hold merit sources and DT members to a higher standard, so it would be even more important they not promote YoBit. But just because someone is not on DT or not a merit source doesn’t mean I think it should be okay for them to promote a scam.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: DireWolfM14 on January 21, 2020, 05:35:19 PM
Yobit as a whole is cancer, but the user in question isnt spamming or fucking the forum.

Yobit is a cancer, not just to the forum, but for crypto in general.  But the two users identified by JollyGood in the opening post wore the signature quoted below, which is obviously a pump-and-dump scheme being used by Yobit to scam their clients.  Promoting another forum or a shady exchange is one thing, promoting an obvious scam is another.




Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TMAN on January 21, 2020, 05:43:17 PM
Yobit as a whole is cancer, but the user in question isnt spamming or fucking the forum.

Yobit is a cancer, not just to the forum, but for crypto in general.  But the two users identified by JollyGood in the opening post wore the signature quoted below, which is obviously a pump-and-dump scheme being used by Yobit to scam their clients.  Promoting another forum or a shady exchange is one thing, promoting an obvious scam is another.



Oh I didn’t even see that, shit I don’t have the headspace or time for this. But maybe a full on yobit ban is due


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 21, 2020, 05:46:59 PM
... But the two users identified by JollyGood in the opening post wore the signature quoted below, which is obviously a pump-and-dump scheme being used by Yobit to scam their clients.  Promoting another forum or a shady exchange is one thing, promoting an obvious scam is another.




I neither defended nor promoted the X10 signature, I can only surmise that your shameless lie, as well as the entirety of the slanderous fictive scenarios that the troll JollyGood spits out on a daily basis are at least partially motivated by the petty games you play to win a coveted spot from the Chipmixer signature...

Your Middle Eastern ancestors would spit on your face if they knew you would stoop to dishonorable lies for a few dollars more,
and I promise you I would teach you a lesson that your ancestors would be proud of, if you were to try any of this duplicitous bullshit in person, Mr. DireHyena...


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 05:56:21 PM
It's up to DT1 to clean DT. In wolwoo's case, that works just fine: wolwoo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1003533) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1003533)  +2 / =1 / -3) (DT1 (-8) 413 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1003533.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-18_Sat_05.16h/1003533.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wolwoo)).

Merit sources are up to theymos, and as far as I know his application has not been accepted. I can't really judge his Merit sending judgement because I can't read most of the posts, but if his judgement on Trust is a indicator for this, it's not good.

Since scams aren't moderated, I don't think promoting a scam is necessarily a reason to reject a Merit source application. Clear judgement is what's needed though, and anger tantrums aren't a good sign.
Yes it worked very well with regards to wolwoo because he was not a suitable candidate by any stretch of the imagination.

Anger issues and throwing the race card around for diversion tactics when all else fails are not a sign of clear judgement, nor is the manner is which he seems to find nothing wrong with what his close ally from the local board wolwoo is doing, hence the trust he left for him:

https://i.postimg.cc/RCtYBwwG/vsp2-Copy.png


Going back to main point raised in the OP, it is clear that a DT member has openly said/accepted he knows he is promoting a scam. Instead of stopping he has decided to blame victims for getting scammed.



Yobit as a whole is cancer, but the user in question isnt spamming or fucking the forum.

Suggesting Yahoo not do the campaign is crazy dude, he is a great manager and is needed if we want to stop all the shitposting pajeets causing us all eyecancer. The only other option is to ban all yobit sigs IMO
You are right the user does not seem to be spamming in the forum but he has stated of his own accord that to him Yobit is a scam but for some inexplicable reason (other than making money) he continues to promote it and decides victims are to blame if they get scammed - therefore the question arises if this is the sort of user that should be on DT?

In my opinion it is a categoric "no" he should not be on DT therefore I asked the question in the OP hoping for a general consensus.



~snip~

I kindly request all to post on topic please. Thank you.
I guess my point is that I think no one should be promoting YoBit. I am not sure but I think yahoo is on DT.

I don’t think it is unreasonable to hold merit sources and DT members to a higher standard, so it would be even more important they not promote YoBit. But just because someone is not on DT or not a merit source doesn’t mean I think it should be okay for them to promote a scam.
All users who promote scams should be held to account but the difference between those that promote it in the belief it is not a scam versus those that promote it knowing it is a scam are two different things altogether. The distinction between the two is huge. In the case of  Vispilio he has made it clear he believes Yobit is a scam and is happy to blame victims for falling to the scam that he promotes. In the case of other users, I have not read them say they believe they are promoting a scam (maybe just wolwoo who in one of the threads linked in the OP might have let it slip once or twice while he was spouting profanities or being highly obnoxious).

To be on DT means having extra responsibility and being extra careful about the manner in which you conduct yourself. Even if all other bits of questionable conduct from Vispilio might be overlooked for the sake of benefits of doubts, I believe there no way whatsoever that any user who admits or accepts that they willing and knowingly are promoting a scam (and furthermore blame victims for getting scammed) should be on DT.

And I agree with you, I think those on MS and DT should be held to a higher standard because there is responsibility attached in the manner in which they conduct themselves.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 21, 2020, 06:09:15 PM

~~~ further insane babble


Never have I said Yobit is a scam, or blamed the "victims" or any of your other insane stories. Who are these fictitious victims by the way ?   ::)

You start a false narrative then come to write novels about it every day here, you are either a child or a certifiable lunatic who needs help, how did you ever get on DT ?..

If lunatics like this guy are allowed to run rampant and smear and slander everyone as they see fit (or as they are ordered to do so by their puppet masters),
then soon no one will be able to take this forum seriously,

When does admin & staff feel it's high time to interfere ?...

A user cannot be reasonably expected to have to come here and respond to the craziest of stories every day just to maintain a reputation on an internet forum... Certainly the responsibility falls at least partially to paid staff members to keep the sanity of this place in check, wouldn't you agree ?..


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 06:12:29 PM
... But the two users identified by JollyGood in the opening post wore the signature quoted below, which is obviously a pump-and-dump scheme being used by Yobit to scam their clients.  Promoting another forum or a shady exchange is one thing, promoting an obvious scam is another.




I neither defended nor promoted the X10 signature, I can only surmise that your shameless lie, as well as the entirety of the slanderous fictive scenarios that the troll JollyGood spits out on a daily basis are at least partially motivated by the petty games you play to win a coveted spot from the Chipmixer signature...

Your Middle Eastern ancestors would spit on your face if they knew you would stoop to dishonorable lies for a few dollars more,
and I promise you I would teach you a lesson that your ancestors would be proud of, if you were to try any of this duplicitous bullshit in person, Mr. DireHyena...

So here is a DT member that likes playing the the "race" card himself (just as wolwoo does) as and when he feels like it but has decided to use race/heritage himself in a reply to a post that contained nothing worthy of getting aggressive for.

There was no need to mention any racial heritage or background but those with petty, low levels of thinking and a false sense of either racial, religious or class superiority or are living with self-bloated belief of hierarchical existence over others just might keep bringing up race as and when it suits their mood.

Retaliatory feedback is not permitted. I gave him plenty of time between tagging him today and tagging his close friends including wolwoo nearly a whole month ago but he did not leave any negative trust for me. As soon as I created this thread I tagged him appropriately and then he leaves retaliatory feedback even though it is not allowed. Another clear reason why this user should not be on DT.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: DireWolfM14 on January 21, 2020, 06:13:27 PM
~

I will admit the only person I saw wearing that signature was wolwoo.  If you did not, then please accept my apology for suggesting you did.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Quickseller on January 21, 2020, 06:19:55 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)   

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.
This is a great point! The underlying root cause of the YoBit spammers promoting a scam exchange is they want to receive the monitory reward that Yobit pays out. I agree that wolwoo should immidiately remove his signature and maybe the OP will forgive him.

Even if you give YoBit the maximum benefit of the doubt, they are still very shady and have engaged in many pump and dump scams and appear to be willing to sell a listing on their exchange for next to nothing. I don’t think YoBit being a scam is even boarder line, it is very clear cut. I think YoBit should be transparently a scam to everyone else. This is not me trying to sow discord within those promoting this exchange.

I don’t think Rodger Ver is allowing YoBit to advertise on his forum.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: akhjob on January 21, 2020, 06:24:18 PM
Quote
Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
DT or Not. None should promote a known scam.



BTW, does this really belong to Meta  ??? If a DT is doing wrong, start a thread in Reputation, convince other DT members to add him to the distrust list. Simple as that. Why drag this to Meta?



Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TMAN on January 21, 2020, 06:25:46 PM

https://i.ibb.co/8KN5y83/yoshit.png


No members should be wearing this, never mind someone on DT! promoting yocunts is one thing, promoting something that is an obvious scam is something else - I actually think OP did a good job of bringing this to light, simple solution is for wolwoo to remove the sig and move on. In the future he needs to be careful with what he promotes, everyone gets a chance to make things right surely?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: yahoo62278 on January 21, 2020, 06:40:08 PM

https://i.ibb.co/8KN5y83/yoshit.png


No members should be wearing this, never mind someone on DT! promoting yocunts is one thing, promoting something that is an obvious scam is something else - I actually think OP did a good job of bringing this to light, simple solution is for wolwoo to remove the sig and move on. In the future he needs to be careful with what he promotes, everyone gets a chance to make things right surely?
Wolwoo is out of the campaign, if he continues wearing the sig I cannot stop him.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: wolwoo on January 21, 2020, 06:56:57 PM

https://i.ibb.co/8KN5y83/yoshit.png


No members should be wearing this, never mind someone on DT! promoting yocunts is one thing, promoting something that is an obvious scam is something else - I actually think OP did a good job of bringing this to light, simple solution is for wolwoo to remove the sig and move on. In the future he needs to be careful with what he promotes, everyone gets a chance to make things right surely?
Wolwoo is out of the campaign, if he continues wearing the sig I cannot stop him.
Bravo you fired the only man who defended yobit
 :D I go and wearing chipmixer (it's a joke)

I like yobit


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 21, 2020, 07:11:55 PM
~

I will admit the only person I saw wearing that signature was wolwoo.  If you did not, then please accept my apology for suggesting you did.

I also retract the bad words I extended towards you.

You are obviously a very educated and smart guy, and seeing you so many times side with people who are showing extreme prejudice to your neighbors is leading to some emotional reactions  ;)...

ps. I never bring anyone's race or ethnicity into the debate, unless it was mentioned specifically by them or brought into the discourse for other reasons previously, just to clear the air before the NPC trolls get triggered again...


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 07:57:32 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)  

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.
This is a great point! The underlying root cause of the YoBit spammers promoting a scam exchange is they want to receive the monitory reward that Yobit pays out. I agree that wolwoo should immidiately remove his signature and maybe the OP will forgive him.

Even if you give YoBit the maximum benefit of the doubt, they are still very shady and have engaged in many pump and dump scams and appear to be willing to sell a listing on their exchange for next to nothing. I don’t think YoBit being a scam is even boarder line, it is very clear cut. I think YoBit should be transparently a scam to everyone else. This is not me trying to sow discord within those promoting this exchange.

I don’t think Rodger Ver is allowing YoBit to advertise on his forum.

I have no idea about whether any other forums are allowing Yobit to promote their signature or not but it would no doubt be showing on their own cryptotalk forum.

With evidence mounting many people will have no choice but to concur when you say there is no borderline and is an out-an-out scam. For me, it already is a scam.

Having said that the thread is about a DT member who has stated he knows Yobit is a scam yet has continued to promote it and added that victims are to blame for getting scammed as well as adding a known fake trust circle member and merit abuser to his trust list (wolwoo):


-----
https://i.postimg.cc/RCtYBwwG/vsp2-Copy.png
-----


Anybody that has responsibility as DT might end up having (for one reason or another) a highly aggressive foul-mouthed user on their trust list, maybe it can happen but no responsible DT member can have a user who was caught out being part of a merit abuse and fake trust circle on his own trust list and add the following glowing feedback for him which could not be further from the truth and that is highly irresponsible, not the action of a DT member. I certainly would not describe wolwoo as:

"A really clever and good-natured individual who has brought a much needed air of goodwill and camaraderie to the local and global forum. Highly reliable conduct in all of his actions I've witnessed so far. "




Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 21, 2020, 10:08:35 PM
WtF is chipmixer doing in yobit's thread again?

https://i.imgur.com/lz60XNE.png

Now that is retaliatory feedback and is shows very bad judgement of DT member.

@Vispilio, when you say that something which you are advertising is running some kind of financial pyramid scam, and you keep advertising such service for your own financial gain no matter what, it makes you associate in a crime.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on January 21, 2020, 10:17:16 PM
the petty games you play to win a coveted spot from the Chipmixer signature...
Meh, I doubt that.  I don't think slamming Yobit would enhance anyone's chances to get in to the Chipmixer campaign, nor would DarkStar_ probably even notice that stuff.  I'm sure he's busy with other things and he doesn't usually post in these drama-filled threads.

I promise you I would teach you a lesson that your ancestors would be proud of, if you were to try any of this duplicitous bullshit in person, Mr. DireHyena...
Internet tough guy in the house.  But somehow I think you're so offended by this precisely because it hurts your chances to keep making money from Cryptotalk/Yobit.  Talk about getting uppity for a few pennies more, eh?  What would your middle eastern ancestors think about that?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 21, 2020, 10:40:41 PM
No members should be wearing this, never mind someone on DT! promoting yocunts is one thing, promoting something that is an obvious scam is something else - I actually think OP did a good job of bringing this to light, simple solution is for wolwoo to remove the sig and move on. In the future he needs to be careful with what he promotes, everyone gets a chance to make things right surely?

Thank you TMAN. I definitely agree with you that everybody should get a chance or more to make things right. Maybe one day wolwoo will be able to calm down and articulate his views in a more friendly manner which will bring him closer to the global forum members and not just in his local language board which will allow the healing process to start.

So far it seems like when he was banned from the Yobit campaign he simply cracked, expressed aggression along with volatility and some profanities, then took on a personal fight against some in the English/Global boards because some highly respected members (and some slightly lesser members including myself) deemed him unsuitable for the DT position that he had after some manipulation took place to get him there. Some of us also objected to his aim of becoming Merit Source so he maintained a very aggressive stance towards us.

Bringing the main issue from the OP back in to this, Vispilio could and should have used his special relationship to ask wolwoo to take a step back and relax but chose to subtly egg him on.

And regardless of what else might or might not be going on in the background, it is clear Vispilio has demonstrated he is not suitable for any responsible role such as Merit Source or DT after promoting a project that he himself cited as a scam.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: notblox1 on January 22, 2020, 01:30:01 AM
Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: IconFirm on January 22, 2020, 01:37:25 AM
WtF is chipmixer doing in yobit's thread again?

https://i.imgur.com/lz60XNE.png

Now that is retaliatory feedback and is shows very bad judgement of DT member.

@Vispilio, when you say that something which you are advertising is running some kind of financial pyramid scam, and you keep advertising such service for your own financial gain no matter what, it makes you associate in a crime.

I completely agree. Diabolical behaviour for a DT account - Theymos/admins should take action.

Tagged & ignored.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 22, 2020, 03:33:29 AM
... Internet tough guy in the house.  But somehow I think you're so offended by this precisely because it hurts your chances to keep making money from Cryptotalk/Yobit.  Talk about getting uppity for a few pennies more, eh?  What would your middle eastern ancestors think about that?

My ancestors are not from the Middle East, I'm from the Black Sea, but let's not ruin your short-sighted fantasies :)...



...

https://i.imgur.com/lz60XNE.png

Now that is retaliatory feedback and is shows very bad judgement of DT member.

...

Nothing to do with retaliation, everything written there is the absolute truth, try it sometime, it might make a man out of you yet marlboroza... Good Luck


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 03:53:48 AM
Nothing to do with retaliation, everything written there is the absolute truth, try it sometime, it might make a man out of you yet marlboroza... Good Luck

Your rating is bullshit. There are no "irrefutable flags" that JollyGood's criticism of Yobit will cause financial damage. You seem to be unable to separate opinion from fact, not a good trait for a DT member.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 22, 2020, 04:08:49 AM
Nothing to do with retaliation, everything written there is the absolute truth, try it sometime, it might make a man out of you yet marlboroza... Good Luck

Your rating is bullshit. There are no "irrefutable flags" that JollyGood's criticism of Yobit will cause financial damage. You seem to be unable to separate opinion from fact, not a good trait for a DT member.

In principle, it is irrefutable. There is a difference between theory and practice. The full disclosure of malicious intent is sufficient to warrant a negative feedback.

When you think about it, everything is an opinion when it comes to moral judgement.

"There are no moral phenomena, only a moral interpretation of phenomena" (one of the strongest quotes from Beyond Good and Evil)

Based on past observations, I don't expect a petty spiteful manipulator like you to understand the intricacies of ontology, but I hope you can at least use your energies to improve your intellectual faculties a bit for the well being of this forum, as theymos seems to so far have placed an inexplicably high amount of trust in you...



Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Bthd on January 22, 2020, 07:53:01 AM
All users who promote scams should be held to account but the difference between those that promote it in the belief it is not a scam versus those that promote it knowing it is a scam are two different things altogether. The distinction between the two is huge. In the case of  Vispilio he has made it clear he believes Yobit is a scam and is happy to blame victims for falling to the scam that he promotes. In the case of other users, I have not read them say they believe they are promoting a scam (maybe just wolwoo who in one of the threads linked in the OP might have let it slip once or twice while he was spouting profanities or being highly obnoxious).

Jollygood, everyone in this forum which has sr and upper ranks knows what means %10 guarantee profit, even they didnt write this sentence on forum. There is a lot of members on Yobit campaign and all of them knows Yobit is a very high risk* exchange.

We have two groups for yobit signature campaign.

promoting yobit signature - knowing what means %10 profit and warning users about it.

or

promoting yobit signature - knowing what means %10 profit and not writing anything about it.

There is some other DT members at yobit campaign which choose second choice. Which one is better ? Negative trusting to first group choosers not seems fair. I think it's better than first one.

On the other hand forum did not ban to promoting yobit signature so every one can promote. 

----------------------------

marlborozo you are promoting X campaign for your own financial gain and i'm promoting Y campaign for my gain. how can we got sure about a project which is not created by ourself ? mt.gox was the most trustfull exchange at 2010-2011 and then they scammed all. May be X or Y campaigns are more proffessional scammers than Yobit, we cant know it anyway before they walk away. Campaign X or Y or Z, it doesnt matters we cant know the reality. we should not promote any campaign if we are speaking about real honesty.

i hope forum cancell all signatures and bounties. we'll have less dramas. (no money, no drama, no bounty scammers, no more empty messages for signatures)

*In my opinion yobit is a big scam and users should walk away from it.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 22, 2020, 09:59:50 AM
Quote
Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
DT or Not. None should promote a known scam.
I agree but when someone promotes it proclaims ignorance it is completely different to someone who openly states it is a scam but continues to promote and blames the victims for falling for the scam and not being smart enough to walk away.

When a DT says it no more proof should be needed that the person is completely irresponsible and unsuited to DT rank.



ps. I never bring anyone's race or ethnicity into the debate, unless it was mentioned specifically by them or brought into the discourse for other reasons previously
Clutching at straws again. You play the race card as and when it suits your agenda, mostly because you are unable to debate in a civil manner and want to create diversion tactics to deflect away from whatever the topic of discussion was...


Please don't involve me in your little DT games, it's extremely boring. If you have a problem / extreme butthurt with Turkish users gaining representation,

take it up with theymos instead of employing NPC trolls to do your dirty work like your newly anointed zealous thrall JollyGood above... Good Luck


I don't have a problem with Turkish users, nice try making it about nationality again. A great example of flawed judgment exhibited by a yet another DT1 member.

I have a problem with you playing that card, as well as with idiots in general getting into DT1 so I will point that out whether you like it or not.





Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: atenolol on January 22, 2020, 11:12:16 AM

https://i.ibb.co/8KN5y83/yoshit.png


No members should be wearing this, never mind someone on DT! promoting yocunts is one thing, promoting something that is an obvious scam is something else - I actually think OP did a good job of bringing this to light, simple solution is for wolwoo to remove the sig and move on. In the future he needs to be careful with what he promotes, everyone gets a chance to make things right surely?
Wolwoo is out of the campaign, if he continues wearing the sig I cannot stop him.


yahoo  was managing Yobit.net signature campaign and got a lot o merits for that. Now if you go through the forum everyone is calling yobit scam (It is a scam indeed ) All that scam exchange supporters have being red tagged and some of them banned. yahoo62278 might be a great bounty manager but was no one sad anything bad about that campaign. So what is going on on this forum? I am not saying anything bad about yahoo but i need some explanation.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188047.0


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 12:38:17 PM
In principle, it is irrefutable. There is a difference between theory and practice. The full disclosure of malicious intent is sufficient to warrant a negative feedback.

Your reference link points to this thread, which shows JollyGood explaining their justification for red-trusting you. "Malicious intent" seems to be an excuse for your itch to retaliate.

Based on past observations, I don't expect a petty spiteful manipulator like you to understand the intricacies of ontology, but I hope you can at least use your energies to improve your intellectual faculties a bit for the well being of this forum, as theymos seems to so far have placed an inexplicably high amount of trust in you...

That's news to me and probably to theymos.

Now here's what you could do for the good of the forum: stop using red trust as your personal blog about people you disagree with.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: The Cryptovator on January 22, 2020, 01:17:53 PM
marlborozo you are promoting X campaign for your own financial gain and i'm promoting Y campaign for my gain. how can we got sure about a project which is not created by ourself ? mt.gox was the most trustfull exchange at 2010-2011 and then they scammed all. May be X or Y campaigns are more proffessional scammers than Yobit, we cant know it anyway before they walk away. Campaign X or Y or Z, it doesnt matters we cant know the reality. we should not promote any campaign if we are speaking about real honesty.
Whoever on the forum wearing paid signature this is for financial gain (including me). And that's the bitter truth even though we accept or not. But what about a project that you are agree with that they are scammer and on the other hand you wearing signature? If you are wearing signature then you should not agree that they are scammer, this is the morality. You are right that we don't know any project they will skip or not, but if they skip or scam people still will you wear signature? I think no.

Many user wearing Yobit signature but doesn't mean they should redundancy with it. Even I had not noticed @wolwoo & @Vispilio before they made Yobit drama. There is more participants, no one got tag so why they were made drama? In as result they removed from DT1 and got tag as well. Seems they are leaving retaliatory feedback (although its not worth anymore) but this is not proper use of trust. We should not forget that we are all just forum users, we are not something extra powerful. So we should match ourself with the community.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: DireWolfM14 on January 22, 2020, 02:28:04 PM
I think wolwoo should stop promoting YoBit so everyone can move on. As a side note, I think the same is true for Yahoo, including him managing (or whatever he is calling it)   

If this means the spam is bad for a few days from YoBit posters, then YoBit signatures will get banned again.
This is a great point! The underlying root cause of the YoBit spammers promoting a scam exchange is they want to receive the monitory reward that Yobit pays out. I agree that wolwoo should immidiately remove his signature and maybe the OP will forgive him.

Even if you give YoBit the maximum benefit of the doubt, they are still very shady and have engaged in many pump and dump scams and appear to be willing to sell a listing on their exchange for next to nothing. I don’t think YoBit being a scam is even boarder line, it is very clear cut. I think YoBit should be transparently a scam to everyone else. This is not me trying to sow discord within those promoting this exchange.

I don’t think Rodger Ver is allowing YoBit to advertise on his forum.

Lol!  Well, one reassuring thing is that you can have a sense of humor about it.  I'll chalk that up as one observable instance where you provide concrete, indisputable evidence that you're not a complete sociopath.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 22, 2020, 02:32:15 PM
marlborozo you are promoting X campaign for your own financial gain and i'm promoting Y campaign for my gain. how can we got sure about a project which is not created by ourself ? mt.gox was the most trustfull exchange at 2010-2011 and then they scammed all. May be X or Y campaigns are more proffessional scammers than Yobit, we cant know it anyway before they walk away. Campaign X or Y or Z, it doesnt matters we cant know the reality. we should not promote any campaign if we are speaking about real honesty.
What? That is not what I said, it is taken out of context and it is complete nonsense.

Who are these fictitious victims by the way ?

Another proof that you don't read anything, you are just (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212036.msg53551790#msg53551790) posting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212036.msg53643101#msg53643101) crap (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212036.msg53643173#msg53643173)!

I can confirm that. Yobit Investbox is a scam!
I personally invested $100 before a year and a half in Yobit Investbox buying one of his shitcoin. Also with 10% interest. After the first 24h and first payments, I was never positive counting investment + profit. So, my $100 investment +10% reward worth $95 after the first 24h. After a few days, I decided to withdraw and sell daily interest only, and keep my basic investment active. Two weeks later, my initial investment worth $0,001, profit which I am withdrawing from Investbox worth around $15.
later I followed some of their tokens, the same schemes was always repeated.

For me, it is a SCAM!

On gambling, I have the chance to win something, small but still have a chance. But on Yobit IB, I can only lose.

Nothing to do with retaliation, everything written there is the absolute truth, try it sometime, it might make a man out of you yet marlboroza... Good Luck
It is retaliation feedback!

Anyway, this user got my attention when they start defending plagiarist scam account, some banned accounts, some users who gamed DT system, continued to defend proven scam advertiser and merited lie, everything is documented here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210195.msg53365479#msg53365479. Also, deflection and ad hominem attacks are very usual behavior of this account. (If they remove any post, just go to one of archive sites and search archived threads).

It really does not surprise me to see them shilling hard.

Can someone translate this post to english:

doğru bir yaklaşım, umarım kazanır, Kalemder foruma düzenli katkılarının yanında bir de sanat yarışmasında olağanüstü emek gösterdi,

Meta'daki türlü entrikalara rağmen de çok erdemli duruş sergiledi, haklı bir seçim olur.
?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 22, 2020, 02:52:51 PM
WtF is chipmixer doing in yobit's thread again?

https://i.imgur.com/lz60XNE.png

Now that is retaliatory feedback and is shows very bad judgement of DT member.

@Vispilio, when you say that something which you are advertising is running some kind of financial pyramid scam, and you keep advertising such service for your own financial gain no matter what, it makes you associate in a crime.
As you highlighted, retaliatory feedback shows he is not suitable for DT but by his own admission he said he knew he was promoting a scam therefore how can anybody provide any justification for Vispilio to be DT rank when he is the antithesis of what a DT member should be?




the petty games you play to win a coveted spot from the Chipmixer signature...
Meh, I doubt that.  I don't think slamming Yobit would enhance anyone's chances to get in to the Chipmixer campaign, nor would DarkStar_ probably even notice that stuff.  I'm sure he's busy with other things and he doesn't usually post in these drama-filled threads.

I promise you I would teach you a lesson that your ancestors would be proud of, if you were to try any of this duplicitous bullshit in person, Mr. DireHyena...
Internet tough guy in the house.  But somehow I think you're so offended by this precisely because it hurts your chances to keep making money from Cryptotalk/Yobit.  Talk about getting uppity for a few pennies more, eh?  What would your middle eastern ancestors think about that?
Well, it seems threatening DireWolfM14 with physical violence is another reason to continue holding Vispilio the low regard that he deserves after knowingly promoting a project that he himself calls a scam. Shocking.



Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.
I am not sure how it all worked out but think there was some form of consensus that led to yahoo62278 being asked or volunteering to manage the Yobit campaign because of previous issues with either non-payment to participants or thread flooding (or maybe both). It has been quoted in several places he managed to clean up a lot the forum by banning several spammers and low-level trash posters which many users appreciated. I think only yahoo62278 can elaborate further or to correct me.

Having said that, this thread was not created about any user showing Yobit or any other banners. I have no interest in which user displays which banner or participates in which campaign unless when the user states he knows he is promoting a scam.

In the case of Vispilio, he is DT yet he is participating in a campaign promoting a project that he has himself labelled a scam. Furthermore he believes victims who fall prey to the scam are effectively to blame for getting scammed and on top of that he has no issues displaying the Yobit banner.

Why is this different from the other many, many users displaying Yobit banners and getting paid for it? As mentioned in the OP:

In simple terms, if a user promotes a scam but does not believe or accept it is a scam, then it is up to the community to present evidence to show them they are wrong.

If however a user openly states he knows he is promoting a scam and then fault blames victims for getting scammed then that clearly shows the user is unsuitable for any responsible role.

If you know of any other users that say they know the banner they are promoting is a scam then please let me know so I can open a thread highlighting them or kindly open a thread yourself and others will post their views there.



WtF is chipmixer doing in yobit's thread again?

~snip~

Now that is retaliatory feedback and is shows very bad judgement of DT member.

@Vispilio, when you say that something which you are advertising is running some kind of financial pyramid scam, and you keep advertising such service for your own financial gain no matter what, it makes you associate in a crime.

I completely agree. Diabolical behaviour for a DT account - Theymos/admins should take action.

Tagged & ignored.
Thank you IconFirm. I agree the admins should really take note of how a DT member is promoting a project he himself calls a scam, then plays the race card when it suits him. This is beyond diabolical for a DT rank to behave in such a nonsensical unbefitting manner.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: hacker1001101001 on January 22, 2020, 03:35:37 PM
Red trust on @Vispilio by @JollyGood.

Quote
Vispilio has self-admitted that Yobit is a scam but he continues to promote their banners for financial gain. He claims the victims are to blame for getting scammed.

No user should ever knowingly promote a scam. No DT users should ever add known merit/fake trust abusers on their own trust list

Recent statement by @JollyGood.

Quote
Other than leaving red trust for Yobit and just one Yobit signature promoter (because of his condescending conduct and deliberate misdirection not failure to justify why he was a die-hard Yobit promoter), I did not leave feedback for Yobit signature promoter.

In my view anybody promoting a scam are guilty of being a scam too simply by association but more important than that is the view I hold they are most probably more ignorant than anything else therefore I do not leave red trust for that reason alone. Had signature promoters investigated the facts fully then most would probably not participate in those scam campaigns."

At time of writing I was and still am against tagging everybody or anybody specifically because they are participating in a scam culture signature campaign for the reasons stated above. I gave reasons for specifically tagging the Yobit user account and the OP user account.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211902.180

I don't know if lier word suits here better or with me.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 22, 2020, 03:56:15 PM
~snip~

You are not mistaken, you are deliberately trying to mislead just as you did by perpetuating a lie in the other thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5212036.msg53658209#msg53658209) and now here too. Your motives for doing so are open to interpretation:

I am so very very tired
Everywhere full of the Mother fucker
This forum is good but people's asshole
Goodluck Theymos
Thanks

Come on dude, you are more than this.

I like your presence around here, hope you see, all the users here are not assholes, but majority in power are, I agree. Keep fighting for good throughout your life.




I am out, I was not upto accusing JollyGood of anything, above was just an advice from me regarding use of trust system, but it's everyone's own opinion.
Well, you changed your tune quick but let us not call that another lie from you ::)


You may have locked your thread after users were discussing whether adding DT negative trust for you was appropriate or not, but it will still be discussed at some point. Maybe your post here was to pre-empt my input in it but it will not: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213377.msg53659644#msg53659644


So going back to your post here, if you think it is important for you to consider me as a liar or not and you want to open a thread to discuss it and ask opinions from other users, please feel free to create one but this thread is about whether it is right for a DT ranked user to promote what he himself has called a scam so kindly stay on topic please.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: hacker1001101001 on January 22, 2020, 04:24:12 PM
~snip~

I am not trying to mislead, the above statement of your was what you used against me to call me a lier. Me clearing this up just triggered you to bring up my accusation which was merely solved by my apology and willingness to not repeat it in there respective thread.

I thought that it really contradicts what you said earlier hence enlighted it. I don't have any hidden motives against you nor you should deem too. My feedback on your trust wall stands about you fighting the scams from the bottom of your heart but you are really pushing users into your grudge against YoBit overall. Did you ever thought of complaining to theymos about it once ? IIRC he banned the campaign last time when it was creating spam, this time there are clear evidences of listing scam tokens. I think he would consider. Just an advice.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 05:05:24 PM
Can someone translate this post to english:

doğru bir yaklaşım, umarım kazanır, Kalemder foruma düzenli katkılarının yanında bir de sanat yarışmasında olağanüstü emek gösterdi,

Meta'daki türlü entrikalara rağmen de çok erdemli duruş sergiledi, haklı bir seçim olur.
?

These guys are classing up the Chipmixer campaign in a hurry:

Hayırdır din forumu mu burası? Nereye nasıl yazacağımı senden mi öğreneceğim? Translate konusunda iyisin bunu da tercüme et oku, sonra da kendi işine bak yalamaya devam et.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Blacknavy on January 22, 2020, 05:27:05 PM
Hayırdır din forumu mu burası? Nereye nasıl yazacağımı senden mi öğreneceğim? Translate konusunda iyisin bunu da tercüme et oku, sonra da kendi işine bak yalamaya devam et.

Forbidden has nothing to do with this topic.

Although I do not like Vispilio, the injustices all of you made to him clearly prove that you are not objective.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 05:50:37 PM
Although I do not like Vispilio, the injustices all of you made to him clearly prove that you are not objective.

What injustices are those? Do they correlate at all with Vispilio's inability to grasp the difference between a diary and a trust system?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 22, 2020, 05:54:19 PM
Can someone translate this post to english:

doğru bir yaklaşım, umarım kazanır, Kalemder foruma düzenli katkılarının yanında bir de sanat yarışmasında olağanüstü emek gösterdi,

Meta'daki türlü entrikalara rağmen de çok erdemli duruş sergiledi, haklı bir seçim olur.
?

These guys are classing up the Chipmixer campaign in a hurry:

Hayırdır din forumu mu burası? Nereye nasıl yazacağımı senden mi öğreneceğim? Translate konusunda iyisin bunu da tercüme et oku, sonra da kendi işine bak yalamaya devam et.



You are on to something suchmoon but there is an obvious contradiction in what Vispilio writes because in one place he accuses/alludes to Chipmixer being nothing more than a scam (which is what Yobit is) and on the other hand he asks to join the Chipmixer campaign:


No matter what one's moral views are, a BTT user should not be penalized for promoting one of the most well known crypto exchanges.

Many crypto exchanges are engaging in unethical practices like fake volume, pump & dump schemes, shitcoin IEO's, etc. and yet they are still highly popular because they also manage to fulfill some really valuable duties like market efficiency and liquidity.

As numerous users have already noted, an analogy can be drawn between promoting Chipmixer and Yobit's InvestBox:

you can choose to be a smart investor and use Investbox to make 0.1% on your BTC monthly without ever investing in any of the shit coins, or you may choose to be a gambler and pursue some short term wild gains in the massively inflated shitcoins (similarly Chipmixer service can be used for illicit activites, yet the marketer cannot and should not be held accountable for a potential abuse of a service that has other net benefits to the ecosystem)...

I agree the wording of the signature can be revised to be more honest, but trying to frame hundreds of Cryptotalk / Yobit participants would be one of the most harmful things this forum can do to herself and its user base...


User name: Vispilio
Post count: 2525
BTC Address (Segwit): bc1qjpms8lghlmd5at6h3h72udgy3elznt9gd32zgx

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Chipmixer's dictum that more local board presence for this campaign will be excellent  :)

Best


It is clear that those duplicitous traits are not enough to ask whether he deserves to be DT ranked or not but what cannot be ignored is his promoting of a banner he himself calls a scam. No user, especially a DT ranked should be able to do that.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Blacknavy on January 22, 2020, 06:23:05 PM
What injustices are those? Do they correlate at all with Vispilio's inability to grasp the difference between a diary and a trust system?

You and your sweet friends are the authority here.
Enjoy.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 06:58:51 PM
What injustices are those? Do they correlate at all with Vispilio's inability to grasp the difference between a diary and a trust system?

You and your sweet friends are the authority here.
Enjoy.

That doesn't really answer the question. Ignore the second part as it's admittedly a bit loaded.

What injustices?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: eddie13 on January 22, 2020, 07:34:08 PM
It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it..

"Oh well I guess CryptoTalk isn't really directly a scam though its parent Yobit facilitates extremely likely scams" -let them advertise
"Oh well I guess Yobit isn't directly a scam though it facilitates extremely likely scams" -let them advertise
"Oh noes!! X10 coin? That is almost definitely a scam so we can't advertise that!!  Better just go back to advertising only Yobit, who is a scam advertiser, but indirectly advertising scams is ok? Right guys?" -let them advertise

X10 coin is nothing new for Yobit.. They have been pushing similar "scams" for years since the ROM crap..

I wonder how many DT members are currently accepting payment from Yobit?

Is Yobit a scam or not?
Is advertising for Yobit advertising for a scam or not?
If it is, then why is it here advertising at all?

It's just too darn close to the edge for a clear consensus it seems..

Why can Vispillo be tagged for advertising a "scam" but all the other that do can not?
Because he posted that he thinks one of Yobit's products is a "scam" and therefore is knowingly advertising a "scam"?

So let me get this straight..
If I go find any posts from anyone currently being paid by Yobit, or has been paid by Yobit, who has previously stated that they think any of Yobit's products (past or present) are a "scam" prior to them accepting any form of payment for their advertisement, they should be red tagged?

But no red tags for anyone advertising Yobit as long as they have never themselves stated that they think any Yobit products are a "scam"?
What a situation in that it depends on the post history of all individual advertising users..

Their are probably plenty to be tagged on this basis.. How many even in DT I wonder?

How can this be made consistent one way or another?


Maybe if I go find a couple more examples of users advertising for yobit while having previously stated they think that any yobit product is/was a scam, then it can be decided to tag them all or tag none..
Sound fair?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TECSHARE on January 22, 2020, 07:57:13 PM
It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it..

"Oh well I guess CryptoTalk isn't really directly a scam though its parent Yobit facilitates extremely likely scams" -let them advertise
"Oh well I guess Yobit isn't directly a scam though it facilitates extremely likely scams" -let them advertise
"Oh noes!! X10 coin? That is almost definitely a scam so we can't advertise that!!  Better just go back to advertising only Yobit, who is a scam advertiser, but indirectly advertising scams is ok? Right guys?" -let them advertise

X10 coin is nothing new for Yobit.. They have been pushing similar "scams" for years since the ROM crap..

I wonder how many DT members are currently accepting payment from Yobit?

Is Yobit a scam or not?
Is advertising for Yobit advertising for a scam or not?
If it is, then why is it here advertising at all?

It's just too darn close to the edge for a clear consensus it seems..

Why can Vispillo be tagged for advertising a "scam" but all the other that do can not?
Because he posted that he thinks one of Yobit's products is a "scam" and therefore is knowingly advertising a "scam"?

So let me get this straight..
If I go find any posts from anyone currently being paid by Yobit, or has been paid by Yobit, who has previously stated that they think any of Yobit's products (past or present) are a "scam" prior to them accepting any form of payment for their advertisement, they should be red tagged?

But no red tags for anyone advertising Yobit as long as they have never themselves stated that they think any Yobit products are a "scam"?
What a situation in that it depends on the post history of all individual advertising users..

Their are probably plenty to be tagged on this basis.. How many even in DT I wonder?

How can this be made consistent one way or another?


Maybe if I go find a couple more examples of users advertising for yobit while having previously stated they think that any yobit product is/was a scam, then it can be decided to tag them all or tag none..
Sound fair?

The only problem is this kind of behavior only expands with this "ok we make it fair by being excessive with everyone". This is the kind of slow creep that takes away everyone's freedoms and ability to be left alone unless directly victimizing others. The kind of people who love running around searching for people to tag over this kind of stuff are salivating over an excuse to just do it for everyone thus retroactively justifying their behavior. Of course you know they will still make exceptions for their pals anyway, but now they have a whole heap of more people to lord over.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 22, 2020, 08:48:19 PM
@eddie13 I guess no one wants more drama and it is damn time consuming. Imagine tagging one account and then they say why only me and then you tag another account and they say why not that other account then you start tagging hundreds accounts and everyone accuse you of trust abuse. Or you tag one and not tag other accounts and someone accuse you of trust abuse. Then some accounts like TECSHARE above start mental gymnastic and create more drama. And when you ask them to elaborate "why is it OK to tag one scammer but if you tag 100 scammers for the same thing then it is not OK" they don't answer but they run away to another thread and repeat the same thing, and drama continues.

Anyway, if you do this:

https://i.imgur.com/z2FpQrm.png

No one will say that it is not OK to tag someone just because they are in signature campaign, but obviously doesn't work in all scenarios.

Vispilio tried to troll but in the "real life", if you pull "yeah, it is pyramid scam" and you still decide to advertise it, and you get caught, you will be fined. For example, in my country, if you knowingly advertise financial pyramid scam, which is what you agreed to advertise when you took that signature and said they run pyramid scam, you can get up to 3 years in jail.

Strong "opinions" and "free speech" can be very dangerous. Teaching people that it is ok to advertise scam because it is not your business if someone can't recognize scam is scammy behavior itself.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: crazy-joe on January 22, 2020, 08:59:54 PM
Vispilio tried to troll but in the "real life", if you pull "yeah, it is pyramid scam" and you still decide to advertise it, and you get caught, you will be fined. For example, in my country, if you knowingly advertise financial pyramid scam, which is what you agreed to advertise when you took that signature and said they run pyramid scam, you can get up to 3 years in jail.
Really? So I'm not sure this forum is legal in your country Sir.
At least 2 sections here are dedicated to that

The Gambling section
Quote
Gambling and all "investments" that are so risky they might as well be gambling (HYIPs, pyramid schemes, etc.)

The Investor-based games section
Quote
Games where the main factor is whether or not new "investors" join the game. Also any Bitcoin-denominated investment product with an APY far above the reasonable market rate.
::)


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 22, 2020, 09:06:10 PM
It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it..
Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 22, 2020, 09:13:08 PM
Really? So I'm not sure this forum is legal in your country Sir.
At least 2 sections here are dedicated to that
Hm, Ok, you missed my point.

Please elaborate your statement.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: crazy-joe on January 22, 2020, 09:17:29 PM
Really? So I'm not sure this forum is legal in your country Sir.
At least 2 sections here are dedicated to that
Hm, Ok, you missed my point.

Please elaborate your statement.
There is nothing to elaborate Sir. The forum obviously allows HYIP and pyramid schemes investments.
So you can't blame people who think it 's allowed here.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 22, 2020, 09:21:52 PM
Really? So I'm not sure this forum is legal in your country Sir.
At least 2 sections here are dedicated to that
Hm, Ok, you missed my point.

Please elaborate your statement.
There is nothing to elaborate Sir. The forum obviously allows HYIP and pyramid schemes investments.
So you can't blame people who think it 's allowed here.
What the fuck does it mean "here"? Scam is not moderated, use search button for scam related subjects. There are so many useful threads you should read.

Seems some people think what is done "here" is not done "for real"  :-\


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: crazy-joe on January 22, 2020, 09:23:56 PM
I'm talking about the forum Sir


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: suchmoon on January 22, 2020, 09:26:44 PM
There is nothing to elaborate Sir. The forum obviously allows HYIP and pyramid schemes investments.
So you can't blame people who think it 's allowed here.

Scams are not moderated (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0). What exactly is your point?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: crazy-joe on January 22, 2020, 09:31:22 PM
There is nothing to elaborate Sir. The forum obviously allows HYIP and pyramid schemes investments.
So you can't blame people who think it 's allowed here.

Scams are not moderated (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0). What exactly is your point?
These sections are moderated.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: eddie13 on January 22, 2020, 09:44:18 PM
The only problem is this kind of behavior only expands with this "ok we make it fair by being excessive with everyone". This is the kind of slow creep that takes away everyone's freedoms and ability to be left alone unless directly victimizing others.

I'm not much of a supporter of giving up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, or in other words, protecting idiots at the expense of loosing valuable users over minor infractions that could possibly put some idiots at greater risk, but if that is what it is then atleast it should be done consistently..

This whole Yobit situation has become too fine of an obfuscated line..
One could definitely make the argument that any advertisement of any Yobit product is advertising a "scam", as in very "high risk" and even predatory "investments"/"scams?"..
On the other hand an argument could be made along the lines of "So what?".. If people are stupid enough to buy the crap then they are stupid and stupid is as stupid does..

The current situation is some sort of blurry line drifting around in the sea somewhere between both of those camps, with possible harsh punishment for tripping on it?

Stupid situation that wouldn't even exist if users didn't want that yobit dust so badly..
Seems you can get away with a lot more, and push the boundaries, as long as you throw around some coin..
Almost like a bribe.. What can you get away with as long as you are paying?

I wouldn't recommend Yobit as a very safe exchange or any of their investments as good investments, but I would use it to dump some coins or something and might recommend to use it to get in, do your business, and get out..
Also, no matter how terrible some coin or asset being traded is, if it has volatility, it can be flipped for a profit..

Teaching people that it is ok to advertise scam because it is not your business if someone can't recognize scam is scammy behavior itself.
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?

Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum.
Right..
After that it's surprising to me that it was welcomed back as it has been, especially considering its borderline scamminess.. But it pays right?


crazy-joe=off topic


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 22, 2020, 10:03:14 PM
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?
Is X10 scam "or just predatory high risk investment offering"?

That is literally what he just asked you. The point being by what standard is this applied?
It should be self-explanatory. I quoted examplens's post few post's back btw, you are old enough to read.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TECSHARE on January 22, 2020, 10:58:55 PM
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?
Is X10 scam "or just predatory high risk investment offering"?

That is literally what he just asked you. The point being by what standard is this applied?



The only problem is this kind of behavior only expands with this "ok we make it fair by being excessive with everyone". This is the kind of slow creep that takes away everyone's freedoms and ability to be left alone unless directly victimizing others.

I'm not much of a supporter of giving up essential Liberty to purchase a little temporary Safety, or in other words, protecting idiots at the expense of loosing valuable users over minor infractions that could possibly put some idiots at greater risk, but if that is what it is then atleast it should be done consistently..

This whole Yobit situation has become too fine of an obfuscated line..
One could definitely make the argument that any advertisement of any Yobit product is advertising a "scam", as in very "high risk" and even predatory "investments"/"scams?"..
On the other hand an argument could be made along the lines of "So what?".. If people are stupid enough to buy the crap then they are stupid and stupid is as stupid does..

The current situation is some sort of blurry line drifting around in the sea somewhere between both of those camps, with possible harsh punishment for tripping on it?

Stupid situation that wouldn't even exist if users didn't want that yobit dust so badly..
Seems you can get away with a lot more, and push the boundaries, as long as you throw around some coin..
Almost like a bribe.. What can you get away with as long as you are paying?

I wouldn't recommend Yobit as a very safe exchange or any of their investments as good investments, but I would use it to dump some coins or something and might recommend to use it to get in, do your business, and get out..
Also, no matter how terrible some coin or asset being traded is, if it has volatility, it can be flipped for a profit..

Teaching people that it is ok to advertise scam because it is not your business if someone can't recognize scam is scammy behavior itself.
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?

Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum.
Right..
After that it's surprising to me that it was welcomed back as it has been, especially considering its borderline scamminess.. But it pays right?


crazy-joe=off topic

The inconsistency is exactly the issue. This is why we need to err on the side of less interference than more. The same standards applied to call Yobit a scam could be applied to half of the altcoin section and more. For fuck sake crypto itself could be made illegal tomorrow. This is all risky. Additionally risky does not always equal scam. Then who gets to decide how it is applied? Unless the line is clear then all this is going to do is invite tons of abuse and endless drama, and for what? Will it stop any of this stuff at the end of the day? Absolutely not.

The integrity of the system as a whole is more important. There needs to be a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contract, or violation of local applicable laws, not just suspicion. The trust system acts as a penalty, as such it should be administered based on this observable evidence, not by how good an accuser is with their creative writing skills and creating plausible theories. This is the entire reason due process exists in law, otherwise the legal system is abused to arbitrarily harass and exploit people for fun and profit like in most 3rd world countries.

The trust system is designed to prevent long cons to a lesser extent account farming as a trade history makes farming accounts much more complicated as it takes a lot more work to fake. The system should not be used like a flack cannon to mass flag and tag people because all that will achieve is to teach people to find it common and ignore it as signal noise. Again beyond that, more importantly this assembly line tagging activity consistently drags otherwise unsuspecting people into endless bullshit and drama that drives away productive user base.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 22, 2020, 11:09:15 PM
Thank you IconFirm. I agree the admins should really take note of how a DT member is promoting a project he himself calls a scam, then plays the race card when it suits him. This is beyond diabolical for a DT rank to behave in such a nonsensical unbefitting manner.

It's not my war, and as always i'm doing idiotic thing when commenting it, but. Do you think that promoting mentally ill person which uses alt accounts to spam negative feedbacks and left positive feedbacks to himself it's trustworthy? In fact, promoting alt and trust abuser, ban evader and unstable old lady with climax?

Because you're doing exact such thing and trying to accuse someone another. Weird for me.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 22, 2020, 11:26:17 PM
~snip~

No one will say that it is not OK to tag someone just because they are in signature campaign, but obviously doesn't work in all scenarios.

Vispilio tried to troll but in the "real life", if you pull "yeah, it is pyramid scam" and you still decide to advertise it, and you get caught, you will be fined. For example, in my country, if you knowingly advertise financial pyramid scam, which is what you agreed to advertise when you took that signature and said they run pyramid scam, you can get up to 3 years in jail.

Strong "opinions" and "free speech" can be very dangerous. Teaching people that it is ok to advertise scam because it is not your business if someone can't recognize scam is scammy behavior itself.

I think some users might direct you to the rules of the forum rather than the real world with its various jurisdictions but keeping with the essence of your post it is absolutely not acceptable for anybody to advertise a scam and then resolve themselves of all responsibility attached to it and shift it on the end user or victim if they have been gullible enough to fall for the scam.



It seems the community came to the general consensus that yobit is not too much of a scam for it to be advertised on the forum right?
I don't like that they were allowed to come back and advertise after being banned for it but the community allowed it..
Small correction: Yobit's signature was never banned for being a scam, it was banned for spamming the forum.

It is good to know Yobit was previously banned here in the forum for effectively flooding/spamming rather any other reason. I could be wrong but it looks like when they were given permission to return they tried their best to drive traffic to their own cryptotalk forum and use it as a competitor to this forum (and also just in case they got banned again) but if that was the case they failed in making any dents here.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: TECSHARE on January 22, 2020, 11:32:56 PM
The trust system should not be used as a wide net shotgunning device as it is not only ineffective, counterproductive, but serves to allow actual con artists to hide in the noise. The standard of "promoting a known scam" is essentially guilt via association and far too arbitrary.

I just want to make a note here that JollyGood excluded me today after I excluded him. Those of you who have accused me of trust system manipulation and retaliation for doing the same feel free to demonstrate holding to your principles by excluding him.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Golgoth on January 23, 2020, 12:22:49 AM
The trust system should not be used as a wide net shotgunning device as it is not only ineffective, counterproductive, but serves to allow actual con artists to hide in the noise. The standard of "promoting a known scam" is essentially guilt via association and far too arbitrary.

I just want to make a note here that JollyGood excluded me today after I excluded him. Those of you who have accused me of trust system manipulation and retaliation for doing the same feel free to demonstrate holding to your principles by excluding him.
He knows that most of Yobit campaign participants are peaceful and passive members and they won't exclude him from their trust list, neither doing any bad things against him.That's why he doesn't care of being like that.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 12:57:44 AM
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?
Is X10 scam "or just predatory high risk investment offering"?

What would most users consider as being the difference between the two of them? I see myself applying the two sides of the same coin analogy.



Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: eddie13 on January 23, 2020, 05:31:17 AM
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?
Is X10 scam "or just predatory high risk investment offering"?

What would most users consider as being the difference between the two of them? I see myself applying the two sides of the same coin analogy.

It's a good question.. That's why I asked..

Maybe Yobit will prove itself useful and help us find out..
What is the difference between Yobit and the last cases of campaigns advertising scams getting every advertiser red-tagged if they don't stop?
Yobit must be pretty borderline if it is so shady but this has not happened.. It is even allowed back after a spam ban.. Why?

If it's a scam enough to tag Vispillo over it then it is surely scam enough to tag all of the participants until removal no?

Starting with Vispillo, picking on Vispillo, and using it as a reason to tag just Vispillo, is a little fucked up if you won't even tag shitposters for advertising the same "scam"..


Not everyone sees situations the same way..
Obviously their are plenty of users in favot of Yobit being allowed to advertise here despite all these detractors.. Or it would be tagged up and run out of here by now, as usual..

Why don't you take it up with Yahoo?
There you have a highly trusted user in favor of it being allowed to advertise here, and if it wasn't for him, it would be banned and gone anyway..


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Vispilio on January 23, 2020, 05:44:04 AM
If it's a scam enough to tag Vispillo over it then it is surely scam enough to tag all of the participants until removal no?

Starting with Vispillo, picking on Vispillo, and using it as a reason to tag just Vispillo, is a little fucked up if you won't even tag shitposters for advertising the same "scam"..

Not everyone sees situations the same way..
Obviously their are plenty of users in favot of Yobit being allowed to advertise here despite all these detractors.. Or it would be tagged up and run out of here by now, as usual..

...

Thanks for your insightful comments eddie,

the main underlying reason they are picking on me is because I was a top candidate for Chipmixer, and the DT Chipmixer mafia wants only their own people or alt accounts to benefit from that lucrative bounty...

No one in his right mind can agree with any of the insane babble produced on this thread, yet you have long standing DT members frothing over their mouths in league with NPC trolls going so far as calling me "beyond diabolical", etc.  ;D

It's really a very petty circus and a disgrace to a once great forum who now sees some of its seemingly most trusted members sell their souls for a few dollars...

If this were a professional business or a respectable organization, well documented manipulators like suchmoon and marlboroza would be fired instantly for interfering with the livelihood and business of their employer (Chipmixer) because their fake character assassination job is actually hurting the chances of Chipmixer getting the representation it deserves on local boards.

I'll probably make a separate thread about this if I can find the time today, but I hope accounts ChipMixer and Darkstar_ are also watching and finally wake up to the total abuse of the Chipmixer campaign going on...


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Blacknavy on January 23, 2020, 06:01:53 AM
Thanks for your extremely insightful comments eddie,

the main underlying reason they are picking on me is because I was a top candidate for Chipmixer, and the DT Chipmixer mafia wants only their own people or alt accounts to benefit from that lucrative bounty...

No one in his right mind can agree with any of the insane babble produced on this thread, yet you have long standing DT members frothing over their mouths in league with NPC trolls going so far as calling me "beyond diabolical", etc.  ;D

It's really a very petty circus and a disgrace to a once great forum who now sees some of its seemingly most trusted members sell their souls for a few dollars...

If this were a professional business or a respectable organization, well documented manipulators like suchmoon and marlboroza would be fired instantly for interfering with the livelihood and business of their employer (Chipmixer) because their fake character assassination job is actually hurting the chances of Chipmixer getting the representation it deserves on local boards.

I'll probably make a separate thread about this if I can find the time today, but I hope accounts ChipMixer and Darkstar_ are also watching and finally wake up to the total abuse of the Chipmixer campaign going on...

Unfortunately, you are absolutely right.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: eddie13 on January 23, 2020, 06:18:04 AM
\

I doubt it has anything to do with ChipMixer..
Probably more to do with them being pissed off at you over woolowowooo...


It's not all just babbling..
I would be wearing that Yobit signature if it was something that I could feel good supporting, but it is not..

I bet I have a Yobit account older than anyone's in this thread.. I have been around it for its entire existence, and knew it was shit when I first laid eyes on it..

First they added the absolute shittiest of all shitcoins.. The exact correct thing to do to make all of cryptocurrency look like shit.. Even Cryptsy didn't add the likes of those complete shitcoins..
Newbies by the tens of thousands have probably gone there and lost all their money due to bad investment advice and being stupid..

The first exchange manipulated markets I have ever seen with their ROM.. I could have got that the first day, and I didn't touch it, and I can't believe how much stupid bought into that..

Then, they paid to SPAM this forum the worst I have ever seen from a single campaign, with a complete disregard for this place and the users here..
Absolute disrespect IMO and that is a greater sin to me than their stupid coin schemes..

You aren't going to catch me wearing a signature for Yobit no way..
Their are a lot of damn good reasons to dislike Yobit..

I'd be wearing some gambling signature long before I wear some Yobit signature, and I don't, because I don't feel good about promoting casino gambling either..

I'd be more in favor of tagging all Yobit signatures than tagging just you..

I like many points of your idealisms but you Turks have been offbase on a lot of shit..
I don't think being cocky and offensive is the way to go here either..


Title: Vispilio, brave defender of the Yobit scam, vs. that awful “DT Chipmixer mafia”
Post by: nullius on January 23, 2020, 07:07:36 AM
Behold!  An extreme “I didn’t get what I wanted!” tantrum which is slightly more interesting than a mundane sigspammer whine, because it emits from a current DT1 member (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-18_Sat_05.16h/982288.html) (!) who, let me get this straight, is a merit source (!!) with high status on a local forum?

the main underlying reason they are picking on me is because I was a top candidate for Chipmixer, and the DT Chipmixer mafia wants only their own people or alt accounts to benefit from that lucrative bounty...

No one in his right mind can agree with any of the insane babble produced on this thread, yet you have long standing DT members frothing over their mouths in league with NPC trolls going so far as calling me "beyond diabolical", etc.  ;D

[—further rambling snipped—]

No, you paranoid doofus, the reason why people are “picking on you” is that you are a pretentious little twit who defends the Yobit scam, insults the intelligence of people who are smarter than you, makes empty violent threats, insults others’ manhood and honour whereas you have neither, and—worst of all, in my opinion—covers for it all with childish misquotes of Nietzsche (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219981.0).

Unlike liberals, I do not so lightly make accusations of mental defect.  An adequate working definition of paranoia is the combination of:

  • Delusions of grandeur:  Falsely believing yourself to be fantastically much greater than you actually are in reality.  (Protip:  Those who are actually grand needn’t desperately posture with hollow pretenses as you do.)
  • Delusions of persecution:  Constructing in your mind some unrealistic scenario in which everybody is out to get you—and naturally, “they” are all out to get you because you are so great!  (I heard that the “DT Chipmixer mafia” is only a front for NSA reptilians on this forum; and you, the great Vispilio, have been targeted by them due to their discovery of your secret stolen birthright as King of the World.)

If you are actually convinced that a “DT Chipmixer mafia” is “picking on you” with “alt accounts” and “NPC trolls” to prevent the great Vispilio from attaining a coveted Chipmixer slot, then you are crazy; and your ideations about your perceived persecutors “frothing over their mouths” with “insane babble” is merely a projection of your own psychosis.

Or, I have an alternative hypothesis:  You are not only a liar, but a dumb one; thus alas!  The “Chipmixer mafia” theory is the best story that you can devise.  So, which is it?  Are you delusional, or are you so pitiful a wretch that you can’t even weave a plausible tall tale?  Not that I think those options are mutually exclusive!

It's really a very petty circus and a disgrace to a once great forum who now sees some of its seemingly most trusted members sell their souls for a few dollars...

Take it from the only person on this forum who is currently wearing an unpaid Chipmixer ad on principle, as a loose-cannon publicity stunt to promote privacy.  (My signature is not approved by DarkStar_ or ChipMixer; though I somehow doubt they disapprove, either.)  —One who, moreover, has casually told several campaign managers that I am moderately uninterested in ever having a paid ad of any kind.

It is quite revealing that in your small mind, you are only capable of imagining that everyone is only here for a “lucrative bounty”.


Title: Re: Vispilio, brave defender of the Yobit scam, vs. that awful “DT Chipmixer mafia”
Post by: Vispilio on January 23, 2020, 07:14:53 AM
~~~ unemployed virgin imbecile begging for attention as per usual

Don't pollute threads with your off-topic inferiority complex nullius,

I know you get sexual pleasure from being intellectually overwhelmed, it's the closest substitute you can find for the real orgasms you must be desperately craving  :),

but we have much better things to do, so you'll have to go beg someone else. Bye.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Blacknavy on January 23, 2020, 07:29:08 AM


DarkStar said that there would likely be a few spots open next week. And then you were active only two days after this announcement (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.msg53465409#msg53465409), right?

This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.

Welcome ChipMixer GANGS

We missed you, welcome.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 07:50:36 AM
Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks.

I'd be more in favor of tagging all Yobit signatures than tagging just you..
This shouldn't happen at all. All these allegedly trustworthy members should voluntarily stop advertising a well-known scam. We are not talking about something that is allegedly a scam.. :-\

Unbelievable and frankly a very sad display for this forum.


Title: Vispilio drops the mask on his unspeakable shame
Post by: nullius on January 23, 2020, 08:56:38 AM
Note the timestamps.  The desperate little boy who impugns the “manhood” of others lacks even the self-control to keep me on ignore.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200123074933/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219981.0#msg53678428
~~~ sockpuppet with extreme butthurt joining the crusade against intellect and virtue on this forum

[...]

Ignored,

https://web.archive.org/web/20200123080645/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219538.60#msg53679268
~~~ unemployed virgin imbecile begging for attention as per usual

Don't pollute threads with your off-topic inferiority complex nullius,

I know you get sexual pleasure from being intellectually overwhelmed, it's the closest substitute you can find for the real orgasms you must be desperately craving  :),

but we have much better things to do, so you'll have to go beg someone else. Bye.

And Vispilio, please keep your sick homoerotic fantasies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211321.msg53677378#msg53677378) to yourself.

it might make a man out of you yet

Also, don’t dish out extremely personal attacks if you can’t take them.  You insulted another man’s honour before his ancestors while threatening him, you insulted another man’s manhood, you insulted the intelligence of one of the forum’s high-intelligence moonstars—and you do all that, to “sell your soul” for a few scam Yodollars!  Whereas now, I will hold up a mirror to show what you most fear, your true face.  Just look above, at what you are revealing about yourself—the shame you reveal in public!  Disgusting.

Your Middle Eastern ancestors would spit on your face if they knew you would stoop to dishonorable lies


I would teach you a lesson that your ancestors would be proud of

I will teach you such a lesson.  And I will do it with the power of words.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 09:00:31 AM
Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks.
I'm on it: I'll make a list of all users who have posted in the past 7 days (http://loyce.club/active/7d.html), and have "yobit" in their profile. Give me a few hours, scraping 8290 profiles now.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 09:52:11 AM
Is it a "scam" or just a predatory "high risk" investment offering? Where is the line?
Is X10 scam "or just predatory high risk investment offering"?

What would most users consider as being the difference between the two of them? I see myself applying the two sides of the same coin analogy.

It's a good question.. That's why I asked..

Maybe Yobit will prove itself useful and help us find out..
What is the difference between Yobit and the last cases of campaigns advertising scams getting every advertiser red-tagged if they don't stop?
Yobit must be pretty borderline if it is so shady but this has not happened.. It is even allowed back after a spam ban.. Why?

If it's a scam enough to tag Vispillo over it then it is surely scam enough to tag all of the participants until removal no?

Starting with Vispillo, picking on Vispillo, and using it as a reason to tag just Vispillo, is a little fucked up if you won't even tag shitposters for advertising the same "scam"..


Not everyone sees situations the same way..
Obviously their are plenty of users in favot of Yobit being allowed to advertise here despite all these detractors.. Or it would be tagged up and run out of here by now, as usual..

Why don't you take it up with Yahoo?
There you have a highly trusted user in favor of it being allowed to advertise here, and if it wasn't for him, it would be banned and gone anyway..


I agree that not everybody will see everything in the same way. We all are entitled to our opinions and rightfully so.

I started this thread with the purpose of asking whether Merit Source or DT users should promote a known scam and explained "the banner he promotes could be from LLC1 or LTD2 or Company3, it would make no difference but it just so happens to be a Yobit banner"

I also explained a blanket ban just for displaying a banner should not warrant a tag unless exceptional circumstances and in my opinion when a user states he is promoting a scam and furthermore adds victims are blamed because they got scammed then yes that user deserves a tag in my opinion.

~snip~

Whether promoting a Yobit banner or any other banner it should not warrant a tag unless there are exceptional circumstances. I have not come across any exceptional circumstances that fit that description yet except for user Vispilio because he has openly stated he is promting a banner in full knowledge it is a scam and that is unacceptable. The banner he promotes could be from LLC1 or LTD2 or Company3, it would make no difference but it just so happens to be a Yobit banner.



Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.
I am not sure how it all worked out but think there was some form of consensus that led to yahoo62278 being asked or volunteering to manage the Yobit campaign because of previous issues with either non-payment to participants or thread flooding (or maybe both). It has been quoted in several places he managed to clean up a lot the forum by banning several spammers and low-level trash posters which many users appreciated. I think only yahoo62278 can elaborate further or to correct me.

Having said that, this thread was not created about any user showing Yobit or any other banners. I have no interest in which user displays which banner or participates in which campaign unless when the user states he knows he is promoting a scam.

In the case of Vispilio, he is DT yet he is participating in a campaign promoting a project that he has himself labelled a scam. Furthermore he believes victims who fall prey to the scam are effectively to blame for getting scammed and on top of that he has no issues displaying the Yobit banner.

Why is this different from the other many, many users displaying Yobit banners and getting paid for it? As mentioned in the OP:

In simple terms, if a user promotes a scam but does not believe or accept it is a scam, then it is up to the community to present evidence to show them they are wrong.

If however a user openly states he knows he is promoting a scam and then fault blames victims for getting scammed then that clearly shows the user is unsuitable for any responsible role.

If you know of any other users that say they know the banner they are promoting is a scam then please let me know so I can open a thread highlighting them or kindly open a thread yourself and others will post their views there.



If it's a scam enough to tag Vispillo over it then it is surely scam enough to tag all of the participants until removal no?

The answer to the question is "no". I made it clear several times and the reason is above and I am highlighting it again below:


If however a user openly states he knows he is promoting a scam and then fault blames victims for getting scammed then that clearly shows the user is unsuitable for any responsible role.

If you know of any other users that say they know the banner they are promoting is a scam then please let me know so I can open a thread highlighting them or kindly open a thread yourself and others will post their views there.

There is a difference between somebody deliberately promoting something they believe to be a scam and somebody who promotes the same thing but does not believe it is a scam.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: eddie13 on January 23, 2020, 10:55:27 AM
There is a difference between somebody deliberately promoting something they believe to be a scam and somebody who promotes the same thing but does not believe it is a scam.

I'm not convinced that Vispillo thinks he is advertising a "scam".. I think he thinks he is advertising a somewhat useful exchange that also happens to have some very stupid "investments" and gimmicks associated with it..
I don't think he is maliciously trying to get people scammed..


Like I mentioned to you a while ago, YOU are the expert scambuster here.. Is it a "scam" or not?
All tags or no tags IMO..

I don't know if it's a "scam".. I know I don't like them because Yobit is a spam financier..
It's just as scammy to me as it was years ago and yet here they still are..

If ya'll pro scambusters think they are a scam then GOOD..
Get TF rid of them to where they won't come back already, and stop their spaming and all this drama over them..

a well-known scam. We are not talking about something that is allegedly a scam.. :-\

It looks like Lauda is quite confident that it's a scam..
Gotta admit that Lauda has some balls..


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: wolwoo on January 23, 2020, 11:55:21 AM
If you are sincere, you will drop yahoo from DT1. He is yobit's campaign manager and Dt1. If you are going to give negative feedback, give it to him first.
My messages are being deleted because I swear, I wrote this without swearing, let's see if it will be deleted again?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 12:17:08 PM
a well-known scam. We are not talking about something that is allegedly a scam.. :-\

It looks like Lauda is quite confident that it's a scam..
Gotta admit that Lauda has some balls..
It's promising mathematically impossible returns.Therefore, it can objectively be nothing other than a scam. People can discuss semantics and their prior behavior all they want (e.g. individual cases of scamming users, of which there are quite many - for reference see all their negatives and the 3 flags that they have), but this is a fact. It's math, not religion. I'm actually quite surprised by the lack of outrage by certain members, but it just proves that this shift to the more decentralized trust system has some side effects. At the very least it is as political as it ever was, if not more.

Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks.
I'm on it: I'll make a list of all users who have posted in the past 7 days (http://loyce.club/active/7d.html), and have "yobit" in their profile. Give me a few hours, scraping 8290 profiles now.
Thank you!


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 23, 2020, 12:26:07 PM
It's promising mathematically impossible returns.Therefore, it can objectively be nothing other than a scam.

As i see, noone advertising Yobit invest box. So, what's a problem? All who weared signature were tagged by suchmoon with neutral tags (and still tagged as i remember). So, again, what's a problem?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 12:29:16 PM
It's promising mathematically impossible returns.Therefore, it can objectively be nothing other than a scam.

As i see, noone advertising Yobit invest box. So, what's a problem? All who weared signature were tagged by suchmoon with neutral tags (and still tagged as i remember). So, again, what's a problem?
So not directly advertising the ponzi/scam, but rather the creator/owner of the ponzi/scam is okay? Have you lost your mind? Do you really believe that people aren't getting scammed as a indirect and direct consequence of your advertising?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 23, 2020, 12:47:53 PM
Have you lost your mind?

No.

Do you really believe that people aren't getting scammed as a indirect and direct consequence of your advertising?

I'm not getting scammed while using Yobit exchanger. Why anyone another should? I mean if you prove that my signature which i'm wearing now - is scam (or at least with high probability) i'll remove it. But if you tried to give me narrative like "Yobit - scam" when you should better try, because i'm using it and don't have any problems with it. Yep, i'm not investing in "investbox" or something another shit. But i don't see any reason why anyone another should do that. Or at least forced to do that.

here is my topic about real scam - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219339.msg53659941#msg53659941
You can notice that it's enough different. User was fooled, ToS was edited (to cover malicious actions), feedbacks were deleted and money were stolen.

I don't see such kind of actions from Yobit. I would call it like "use it carefully using your brain".

The same example with your signature - noone is forced to use gambling, but without brain anyone will obvious lost all his money. There is not any chance to "win" in long distance. Despite some idiots telling another.

So mu view is clear: Invest box is scam, but Yobit itself it's not. It's the same as gambling. If you have conscience to advertise gambling, when i will advertise Yobit.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 12:51:13 PM
I'm not getting scammed while using Yobit exchanger. Why anyone another should? I mean if you prove that my signature which i'm wearing now - is scam (or at least with high probability) i'll remove it. But if you tried to give me narrative like "Yobit - scam" when you should better try, because i'm using it and don't have any problems with it. Yep, i'm not investing in "investbox" or something another shit. But i don't see any reason why anyone another should do that. Or at least forced to do that.

here is my topic about real scam - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219339.msg53659941#msg53659941
You can notice that it's enough different. User was fooled, ToS was edited (to cover malicious actions), feedbacks were deleted and money were stolen.

I don't see such kind of actions from Yobit. I would call it like "use it carefully using your brain".

The same example with your signature - noone is forced to use gambling, but without brain anyone will obvious lost all his money. There is not any chance to "win" in long distance. Despite some idiots telling another.

So mu view is clear: Invest box is scam, but Yobit itself it's not. It's the same as gambling. If you have conscience to advertise gambling, when i will advertise Yobit.
The money that you are getting has completely made you biased beyond repair. Do you think that people who advertise ponzis do not get punished by law? You are knowingly enabling and promoting them, and by doing so are increasing the user base of potential victims of their scam product. Whether you yourself got directly scammed or not is irrelevant. This is one of the most pathetic displays of "trustworthy members" in these numbers in the recent years on this forum.

What would happen if I went and used the investbox now and got scammed? Will you protect Yobit again, under what pretenses? That I knowingly went to get scammed? That you're only advertising a different product of a scamming entity so it's alright? Will you compensate me for my money?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 23, 2020, 01:15:16 PM
Do you think that people who advertise ponzis do not get punished by law?

In my country, people who advertising gambling services is also punished by law. Not only in my - in USA, in EU and many other.

You are knowingly enabling and promoting them, and by doing so are increasing the user base of potential victims of their scam product.

You advertising gambling where people lost their money so you "are inscreasing the user base of potential victims".
Or people who will lost their money on dice it's not victims, but people who will lost their money in invest box - it is? "O мaй гaд Лayдa, ты чтo, кpeйзи?" No, really.

In my childhood, when casinos and gamblings were allowed in Ukraine, a man from our house, in fact, our neighbor killed his wife with an butcher axe because she tried to stop he from going to shitty casino. And you're advertising such shit, so you're increasing the probability of such cases.

I can understand people without signature, or people with mixers signature or any other service who is calling "you doing bad thing, man". But i will not listen blinded people who wear shitty gambling signatures, promoting services which is destroing someone's lives and trying to accuse me in something. That's all, discussion end.


That I knowingly went to get scammed? That you're only advertising a different product of a scamming entity so it's alright? Will you compensate me for my money?

I will not compensate you anything. The same if you'll jump from a roof i will not go to prison because of that. Even if i advertised this house or a roof. Because you have your brain and i doubt that you have certificate from hospital that you're ill and not responsible for your actions.


P.S: Here we go again. While anyone Yobit promoters silently making their money, i'm argue with Yobit haters and as in russian "Бyдy кaк вceгдa кpaйним". At least, increasing my english skills :P


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 01:26:46 PM
In my country, people who advertising gambling services is also punished by law. Not only in my - in USA, in EU and many other.
This is not true.

I will not compensate you anything. The same if you'll jump from a roof i will not go to prison because of that. Even if i advertised this house or a roof. Because you have your brain and i doubt that you have certificate from hospital that you're ill and not responsible for your actions.
Quoted for reference. I will now go invest in this legitimate company and when I become rich (and I will very soon given the very juicy returns), I will share it with everyone who advertises it. If I get scammed, I will hold you and anyone else advertising Yobit accountable.

The more responses I get and the more that I read, the case to tag everyone as opposed to singular cases (as I previously quoted eddie) grows stronger.

P.S: Here we go again. While anyone Yobit promoters silently making their money, i'm argue with Yobit haters and as in russian "Бyдy кaк вceгдa кpaйним". At least, increasing my english skills :P
You are Russian?


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 01:31:32 PM
There is a difference between somebody deliberately promoting something they believe to be a scam and somebody who promotes the same thing but does not believe it is a scam.

I'm not convinced that Vispillo thinks he is advertising a "scam".. I think he thinks he is advertising a somewhat useful exchange that also happens to have some very stupid "investments" and gimmicks associated with it..
I don't think he is maliciously trying to get people scammed..
I also agree that from his posts that here is no evidence he is trying to get anybody scammed but he should be very careful about the words he uses when he expresses his opinions because he called it a scam and he called it a pyramid scheme. Further implying that victims should either not invest or should invest but sell up/get out before the scam implodes and allowing other victims to carry the can - again is not a good thing.



Like I mentioned to you a while ago, YOU are the expert scambuster here.. Is it a "scam" or not?
All tags or no tags IMO..
You give me more credit than I deserve  ;D

I have been fairly inactive investigating scams for some time now and am no expert scam-buster but I do have an opinion. In my opinion Yobit is a scam but I will not tag all users showing the Yobit banner simply because there are people in this forum that display the Yobit banner believing it is not a scam. I will tag every single participant of any project that I become aware of that claims they knowingly are promoting a scam.



I don't know if it's a "scam".. I know I don't like them because Yobit is a spam financier..
It's just as scammy to me as it was years ago and yet here they still are..

If ya'll pro scambusters think they are a scam then GOOD..
Get TF rid of them to where they won't come back already, and stop their spaming and all this drama over them..

a well-known scam. We are not talking about something that is allegedly a scam.. :-\

It looks like Lauda is quite confident that it's a scam..
Gotta admit that Lauda has some balls..
If Yobit is banned from the forum then I will tag every and any user showing the banner after the ban is enforced but any user displaying the banner would probably get banned quick-time anyway.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 01:56:11 PM
If Yobit is banned from the forum then I will tag every and any user showing the banner after the ban is enforced but any user displaying the banner would probably get banned quick-time anyway.
If Yobit is banned as in sig. banned, then they won't be able to wear them anyway (theymos stripped all the signatures last time for 60 days). And we are likely going to end up with "we're letting this one slide" until we have a "Yobit 2.0" case.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 23, 2020, 02:01:51 PM
This is not true.

About USA:
Quote
Accepting online gambling advertising is also illegal. If you are a small publisher, you are less likely to be prosecuted, but why risk it? As of early 2009, only large and mid-size publishers had faced prosecution. In 2007, the three big search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft) each paid a fine for accepting online gambling ads, but did not face criminal charges. Other publishers, such as Esquire Magazine, have been warned by the government not to take online gambling advertising.

Facilitating the transfer of funds to online casinos is also a bad idea. As of 2006, it became illegal for American banks to process transactions originating from or directed toward any online gambling operator. Because of this, several sites then refused to take bets from American players. But as the law seems difficult to enforce, it has not turned the tide completely for American players.
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/online-gambling-is-it-legal

So, if you're amercian, you doing illegal things while advertising online casino. If you're not getting punished, that doesn't means that this is "legal".

About other countries:
Quote
In Spain, gambling advertisements are prohibited from being shown outside of 10PM-6AM and in-show promotion of gambling services is strictly prohibited at all times.

Quote
For instance, only operators whose equipment is located in the UK can advertise within the country’s borders. Any operator based outside the territory that still wants to advertise within must obtain a special license from the Gambling Commission.

I doubt that Fortunejack or you have such license.

Quote
In Australia, advertising for both online and land casinos is regulated by each State/Territory. Many of these have strict parameters toward including responsible gambling messages and prohibiting any phrase that misrepresents the likelihood of winning (such as “Winning is easy at…”)

https://www.casino.org/blog/a-recent-history-of-gambling-advertising/

Oh my God, fuck it off. Even if it's would not be prohibited. We don't have only laws from countries. Laws depends from country to country and sometimes they are against moral and ethics.

But we still have the last two (ethics and moral)! You convinced yourself that advertising of gambling is normal, but keep trying to accuse people who in fact doing the same thing. You're ignored my previous replic about casinos, because you can't say anything against of that.  

And yep
The money that you are getting has completely made you biased beyond repair.

It's about you. (and me in some fact) I will even merit this, because it's perfectly fits to any gambling supporter.

I will not compensate you anything. The same if you'll jump from a roof i will not go to prison because of that. Even if i advertised this house or a roof. Because you have your brain and i doubt that you have certificate from hospital that you're ill and not responsible for your actions.
Quoted for reference. I will now go invest in this legitimate company and when I become rich (and I will very soon given the very juicy returns), I will share it with everyone who advertises it. If I get scammed, I will hold you and anyone else advertising Yobit accountable.

Ehm, what?
"You told me that you will not compensate me anything, and i think that this is scam, but i will invest in it and you will be guilty in that!"

"O мaй гaд Лayдa, ты чтo, кpeйзи?"


Edit:
What i'm trying to say: You can't accuse someone while doing the same (in fact) things. So we have here two ways: do not accuse anyone, or accuse anyone with crystal reputation. And shilling shitty gamblings is not fitted for point "crystal reputation"


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: marlboroza on January 23, 2020, 02:02:34 PM
the main underlying reason they are picking on me is because I was a top candidate for Chipmixer, and the DT Chipmixer mafia wants only their own people or alt accounts to benefit from that lucrative bounty...

No one in his right mind can agree with any of the insane babble produced on this thread, yet you have long standing DT members frothing over their mouths in league with NPC trolls going so far as calling me "beyond diabolical", etc.  ;D

It's really a very petty circus and a disgrace to a once great forum who now sees some of its seemingly most trusted members sell their souls for a few dollars...

If this were a professional business or a respectable organization, well documented manipulators like suchmoon and marlboroza would be fired instantly for interfering with the livelihood and business of their employer (Chipmixer) because their fake character assassination job is actually hurting the chances of Chipmixer getting the representation it deserves on local boards.

I'll probably make a separate thread about this if I can find the time today, but I hope accounts ChipMixer and Darkstar_ are also watching and finally wake up to the total abuse of the Chipmixer campaign going on...
Huh?

Everything you posted is one big LIE!

You are trolling me since I exposed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210195.msg53365479#msg53365479) some ban evaders, merit abusers and DT manipulators which happens to be your friends! You continued with trolling I see!

What "their own people", what alt accounts in chipmixer, what mafia? You are lying.

None of this is true!

What manipulation you are referring to? While I posted facts, your posts are defamatory, lies and bunch of ad hominem attacks.

The only one I can see is trying to manipulate something is you.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 02:39:27 PM
Thanks for your extremely insightful comments eddie,

the main underlying reason they are picking on me is because I was a top candidate for Chipmixer, and the DT Chipmixer mafia wants only their own people or alt accounts to benefit from that lucrative bounty...
Can you present evidence or will you just keep regurgitating lies after lies?



but I hope accounts ChipMixer and Darkstar_ are also watching and finally wake up to the total abuse of the Chipmixer campaign going on...
Maybe they will read this thread and conclude you are not a suitable candidate to consider.



~~~ unemployed virgin imbecile begging for attention as per usual

Don't pollute threads with your off-topic inferiority complex nullius,

I know you get sexual pleasure from being intellectually overwhelmed, it's the closest substitute you can find for the real orgasms you must be desperately craving  :),

but we have much better things to do, so you'll have to go beg someone else. Bye.
How can anybody add you to their trust list after reading the highly distasteful comments you spout on a regular basis?

If it is not about you accusing others of racism, then it is something else, always something with you... it is precisely these low level ridiculous posts that add to case against which show you are unsuitable for DT rank. What exactly is wrong with you?

It is not a surprise to see you getting gently and subtly encouraged to continue your non-existent "me versus the rest of the world" fantasy by a couple of members, it is akin to when you were egging on wolwoo to fight his own "me versus the rest of the world" fantasy a couple of weeks ago. What goes round comes around, one day you were nudging wolwoo in the wrong direction and now it is your turn to be nudged in the wrong direction...

At which point will you stop behaving like a total fool and will decide to engage with wider community beyond those that are on the local language board you use and beyond those that encourage and gently nudge you along to continue your pathetic fight?


Title: Yobit is not a gambling site; claims EV+; would be scam-tagged on gambling forum
Post by: nullius on January 23, 2020, 04:10:18 PM
The same example with your signature - noone is forced to use gambling, but without brain anyone will obvious lost all his money. There is not any chance to "win" in long distance. Despite some idiots telling another.

So mu view is clear: Invest box is scam, but Yobit itself it's not. It's the same as gambling. If you have conscience to advertise gambling, when i will advertise Yobit.

The analogy is not admissible, for two reasons:

(1) Yobit is almost like a gambling site which promises EV+, and most especially promises extreme EV+ on “Investbox”.  I say “almost”, because it is worse:  A typical provably-fair gambling site has a house edge of only around 1%, and thus makes a far superior “investment”.

Gambling scams should and do get busted.  You will note that on my ultraconservative trust list, I have included a forum member whom I have not seen involved in DT politics, and who indeed is little-known outside the Development & Technology forum and the gambling-related forums.  Some gambling sites are scams that make arithmetically impossible claims.  RGBKey has a strong history of tearing those apart with his technical acumen; and he is a promoter of provably fair gambling.

My very first involvement with Bitcoin gambling was when RGBKey red-tagged the later-banned user alia for promoting an allegedly EV+ gambling script (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3044369.0).  That was a scam.

Gambling sites which honestly do what they say on the tin are not scams, not even remotely comparable to Yobit; and to call Yobit a “gambling site” is an unwarranted calumny against actual gambling sites.

(2) Yobit does not call itself a gambling site!  The label it puts on itself is critical.  Words have meanings.  “Gambling” means gambling.  Any gambling site which does not call itself “gambling” is, ipso facto, a scam.



Your argument boils down to:  Yobit is tantamount to a non-provably-fair quasi-gambling site which does not call itself a gambling site, but instead invites “investment” with claims of EV+.  Scam, scam, scam.

If Yobit tried their claims on the gambling forum, they would immediately be red-tagged to hell by gambling-scam busters.

And it does not matter if Yobit may offer some services which a shrewd person may use without getting cheated.  An actual gambling site which offered some honest services, and some purportedly EV+ gambling would be called a scam site in total.  So, you began the comparison—I suggest that you complete it by applying the same standards as the gambling forum would use!  The unavoidable result of this analysis is that advertising Yobit in any way is advertising a scam site.


Will have other replies here and elsewhere...


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: johhnyUA on January 23, 2020, 04:54:32 PM
The analogy is not admissible, for two reasons:

(1) Yobit Investbox is almost like a gambling site which promises EV+, and most especially promises extreme EV+ on “Investbox”.  I say “almost”, because it is worse:  A typical provably-fair gambling site has a house edge of only around 1%, and thus makes a far superior “investment”.

I'm looking in that more phylosophical, as i think. Invest box is scam. And when Yobit tried to push such signature - i removed my own, because for me it's obvious scam. But now, i'm not advertising invest box, i'm advertising Yobit.

And you trying to push narrative "Yobit == Investbox". Invest box is part of Yobit, but not Yobit itself. The same as corrupted police is part of Ukraine, but not Ukraine itself so narrative from some Western assholes like "Ukraine is corrupted" is not true. And smells shitty.

Maybe people who don't live in post USSR countries can't understand that important moment, how something which obviously has some bad or scammy parts may not be a bad/scammy thing by itself. I don't know for sure.

At second, as i said, i personally never have any problem with Yobit, also i know many people who honestly telling that they haven't any problem with Yobit. Yobit is one of the important places, because this is centralized exchanger without KYC so in crypto industry is high pros.

Gambling sites which honestly do what they say on the tin are not scams, not even remotely comparable to Yobit; and to call Yobit a “gambling site” is an unwarranted calumny against actual gambling sites.

It was a bad comparison. Better it would like to compare Yobit with something like a swamp - you can live there, you can cross over it, but one wrong move - and you're dead.

The unavoidable result of this analysis is that advertising Yobit in any way is advertising a scam site.

Wrong.


later-banned user alia for promoting an allegedly EV+ gambling script (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3044369.0).  That was a scam.
It's of course out-of-topic, but remind me - this was you who highly promoted user alia and accuses everyone who had any suspicions about her. And pam-pam, user alia is scammer. So, did you beared any responsibility? You know, there a very good term invented by highly respected Nassim Taleb - Skin in the game (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_in_the_Game_(book)).

In fact, you "advertised a scammer"


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: blurryeyed on January 23, 2020, 05:20:41 PM
Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks.
I'm on it: I'll make a list of all users who have posted in the past 7 days (http://loyce.club/active/7d.html), and have "yobit" in their profile. Give me a few hours, scraping 8290 profiles now.

Nice one. My finger is hovering over the big red TAG button in anticipation.....

BTW - why am I the only person on the whole forum with the guts to tag the person responsible for all the spamming/scamming/drama posts concerning Yoshit - the campaign manager who sold his reputation for greed by promoting these Yoshit scammers - yahoo62278? I see no end of members complaining about it but nobody actually does anything about it - come on guys & gals - actions speak louder than words.

Trustworthy & reputable manager my ass.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 05:44:58 PM
Can someone please compile a list of all users wearing any Yobit signatures? Thanks.
I'm on it: I'll make a list of all users who have posted in the past 7 days (http://loyce.club/active/7d.html), and have "yobit" in their profile. Give me a few hours, scraping 8290 profiles now.
Thank you!
Here's the list. Please note that I did a case insensitive search for "yobit" in all profiles that have posted in the last week. This means that someone with for instance "Fork yobit, they're forking scammers" in his signature is included too:

     1. Sr. Member FairUser (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2494) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2494) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FairUser))
     2. Hero Member alan2here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=14388) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=14388) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=alan2here))
     3. Hero Member hello_good_sir (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18161) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=18161) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hello_good_sir))
     4. Hero Member GideonGono (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=20857) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=20857) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=GideonGono))
     5. Legendary seleme (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=22145) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=22145) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=seleme))
     6. Sr. Member djgtr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=22398) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=22398) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=djgtr))
     7. Sr. Member Boov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=23186) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=23186) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Boov))
     8. Hero Member n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=26401) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=n0ne))
     9. Legendary A-Bolt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=33631) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=33631) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=A-Bolt))
    10. Sr. Member Ahimoth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37094) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=37094) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Ahimoth))
    11. Sr. Member 3la9l_kolbaCa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=38045) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=38045) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=3la9l_kolbaCa))
    12. Sr. Member UNOE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=49791) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=49791) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=UNOE))
    13. Legendary gweedo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=57136) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=57136)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=gweedo))
    14. Hero Member pajak666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=58596) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=58596) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pajak666))
    15. Legendary iram3130 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=62748) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=62748) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iram3130))
    16. Sr. Member biddicoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64661) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=64661) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=biddicoin))
    17. Sr. Member BTCGOLD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64724) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=64724) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BTCGOLD))
    18. Hero Member tenakha (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65105) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=65105) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tenakha))
    19. Copper Member deathcode (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65907) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=65907)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=deathcode))
    20. Legendary PuertoLibre (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=66605) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=66605) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=PuertoLibre))
    21. Hero Member Red_Evil (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=72878) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=72878) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Red_Evil))
    22. Legendary casper77 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=73499) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=73499) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=casper77))
    23. Legendary btccashacc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=76684) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=76684) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=btccashacc))
    24. Hero Member mrdeposit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=77867) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=77867) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mrdeposit))
    25. Legendary sana54210 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78995) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=78995) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sana54210))
    26. Hero Member msarro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=79831) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=79831) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=msarro))
    27. Sr. Member codegnome (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81910) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=81910) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=codegnome))
    28. Sr. Member Yurkov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=82806) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=82806) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Yurkov))
    29. Legendary mr_random (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=82915) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=82915) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mr_random))
    30. Sr. Member TheAndy500 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=85021) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=85021) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TheAndy500))
    31. Hero Member iTradeChips (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=85601) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=85601) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iTradeChips))
    32. Hero Member StephenJH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=86939) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=86939) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=StephenJH))
    33. Hero Member Nimbulan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=88178) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=88178) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Nimbulan))
    34. Sr. Member bluebit25 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=90531) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=90531) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bluebit25))
    35. Legendary Searing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=99165) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=99165)  +3 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Searing))
    36. Sr. Member nutriagrigia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=100589) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=100589) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nutriagrigia))
    37. Hero Member ice098 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105609) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=105609) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ice098))
    38. Legendary alyssa85 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105677) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=105677) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=alyssa85))
    39. Hero Member BChydro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107533) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=107533) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BChydro))
    40. Sr. Member drlukacs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=107910) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=107910) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=drlukacs))
    41. Sr. Member MrGunkin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=108785) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=108785) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MrGunkin))
    42. Hero Member KennyR (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=110570) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=110570) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=KennyR))
    43. Legendary hanspeter77 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=110642) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=110642)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hanspeter77))
    44. Hero Member uray (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113074) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=113074) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=uray))
    45. Sr. Member liuqi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113294) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=113294) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=liuqi))
    46. Hero Member Gheka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=119503) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=119503) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Gheka))
    47. Sr. Member LordShanken (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=128136) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=128136) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LordShanken))
    48. Legendary Danydee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=139084) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=139084) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Danydee))
    49. Sr. Member Wipeout2097 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140481) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=140481) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wipeout2097))
    50. Hero Member Kyraishi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=143378) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=143378) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kyraishi))
    51. Hero Member xZork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=145822) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=145822)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xZork))
    52. Hero Member BlackFor3st (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=148841) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=148841) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BlackFor3st))
    53. Hero Member duuuuude (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149006) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=149006) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=duuuuude))
    54. Hero Member xzone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149135) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=149135) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xzone))
    55. Hero Member lixer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152822) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152822) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lixer))
    56. Legendary Beoga (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153128) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=153128) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Beoga))
    57. Legendary SquallLeonhart (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154210) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154210) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SquallLeonhart))
    58. Sr. Member djsugar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154228) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154228) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=djsugar))
    59. Hero Member vvu351 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155975) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=155975) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=vvu351))
    60. Legendary DGulari (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=156323) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=156323) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DGulari))
    61. Legendary abel1337 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=156391) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=156391) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=abel1337))
    62. Legendary deisik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=156665) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=156665) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=deisik))
    63. Legendary piebeyb (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=157691) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=157691) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=piebeyb))
    64. Legendary Wexlike (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=170180) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=170180) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wexlike))
    65. Legendary kodtycoon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174773) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=174773)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kodtycoon))
    66. Hero Member Divinespark (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177594) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=177594) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Divinespark))
    67. Legendary hopenotlate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177723) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=177723) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hopenotlate))
    68. Hero Member Dalmar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177908) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=177908) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Dalmar))
    69. Legendary GrinZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188159) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=188159) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=GrinZ))
    70. Hero Member Ferris419 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=189726) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=189726)  +0 / =0 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Ferris419))
    71. Sr. Member desticy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=192037) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=192037) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=desticy))
    72. Hero Member YinShuiSiYuan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195798) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=195798) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=YinShuiSiYuan))
    73. Sr. Member nickenburg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195903) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=195903) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nickenburg))
    74. Hero Member senne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=196616) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=196616) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=senne))
    75. Hero Member fravia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=198181) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=198181) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fravia))
    76. Legendary tsaroz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=198837) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=198837) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tsaroz))
    77. Legendary makishart (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=199428) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=199428) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=makishart))
    78. Sr. Member Triffin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=200923) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=200923) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Triffin))
    79. Hero Member TinaK (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=203926) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=203926) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TinaK))
    80. Sr. Member MuffinMaster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=204074) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=204074) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MuffinMaster))
    81. Hero Member Webetcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205895) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=205895) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Webetcoins))
    82. Legendary robelneo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205954) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=205954)  +3 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=robelneo))
    83. Hero Member CodyAlfaridzi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=209102) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=209102) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CodyAlfaridzi))
    84. Sr. Member kro55 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=209546) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=209546) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kro55))
    85. Sr. Member angrynerd88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=215377) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=215377) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=angrynerd88))
    86. Sr. Member huige007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=217281) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=217281) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=huige007))
    87. Legendary lionheart78 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=221727) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=221727) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lionheart78))
    88. Hero Member S4VV4S (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=222038) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=222038)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=S4VV4S))
    89. Sr. Member ReiMomo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=225714) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=225714) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ReiMomo))
    90. Sr. Member Xardasim (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=226299) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=226299) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Xardasim))
    91. Sr. Member Wysi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=229645) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=229645) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wysi))
    92. Legendary serjent05 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=230934) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=230934)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=serjent05))
    93. Hero Member john1010 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=233431) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=233431) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=john1010))
    94. Hero Member bitkanu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234380) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=234380) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitkanu))
    95. Sr. Member qumatru (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234437) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=234437) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=qumatru))
    96. Hero Member turkandjaydee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=238725) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=238725) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=turkandjaydee))
    97. Sr. Member paulk11087 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=240466) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=240466) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=paulk11087))
    98. Sr. Member bitgov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=253969) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=253969)  +0 / =1 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitgov))
    99. Sr. Member longyenthanh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=259895) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=259895) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=longyenthanh))
   100. Sr. Member tz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=261227) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=261227) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tz))
   101. Sr. Member aliceHortrex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=264921) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=264921)  +0 / =0 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=aliceHortrex))
   102. Sr. Member chaoscoinz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=288130) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=288130) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=chaoscoinz))
   103. Sr. Member joinfree (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=290291) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=290291) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=joinfree))
   104. Legendary crossabdd (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=293241) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=293241) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=crossabdd))
   105. Sr. Member killerfrost (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=299229) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=299229) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=killerfrost))
   106. Hero Member magneto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=299894) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=299894)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=magneto))
   107. Sr. Member Wildwest (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300241) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=300241) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wildwest))
   108. Sr. Member novaprime (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300745) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=300745) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=novaprime))
   109. Legendary kotwica666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=303259) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=303259) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kotwica666))
   110. Legendary Sithara007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=305398) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=305398) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Sithara007))
   111. Legendary Alex077 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=306213) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=306213) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Alex077))
   112. Sr. Member Kevondo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=307332) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=307332) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kevondo))
   113. Hero Member diazepam666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=308392) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=308392)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=diazepam666))
   114. Sr. Member leyton11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=309226) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=309226) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=leyton11))
   115. Sr. Member Soots (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=309637) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=309637) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Soots))
   116. Legendary Kepasa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310031) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=310031) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kepasa))
   117. Sr. Member acdc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=313530) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=313530) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=acdc))
   118. Hero Member Edraket31 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317290) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317290) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Edraket31))
   119. Hero Member Thomas-s (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320785) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=320785) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Thomas-s))
   120. Legendary RealMalatesta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321061) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=321061) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=RealMalatesta))
   121. Sr. Member cryptoangel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321892) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=321892) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cryptoangel))
   122. Hero Member ubercool (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=321898) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ubercool))
   123. Hero Member johnwest (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=321979) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=321979) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=johnwest))
   124. Sr. Member kojektea (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=322463) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=322463) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kojektea))
   125. Sr. Member Youghoor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=324128) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=324128) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Youghoor))
   126. Legendary marioantonini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=326035) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=326035) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=marioantonini))
   127. Sr. Member sovie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=328196) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sovie))
   128. Legendary ingiltere (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=333827) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=333827)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ingiltere))
   129. Legendary o48o (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=333949) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=333949) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=o48o))
   130. Hero Member naska21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=335282) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=335282) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=naska21))
   131. Sr. Member erep (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=335399) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=335399) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=erep))
   132. Legendary iluvbitcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=337097) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=337097)  +21 / =2 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iluvbitcoins))
   133. Hero Member Danslip (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=338843) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=338843) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Danslip))
   134. Sr. Member Lore06 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=340317) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=340317) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lore06))
   135. Legendary qiwoman2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=340890) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=340890) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=qiwoman2))
   136. Legendary keyscore44 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=344250) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=344250) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=keyscore44))
   137. Hero Member Valzador (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=346373) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=346373)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Valzador))
   138. Legendary enhu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=350984) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=350984) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=enhu))
   139. Sr. Member EdvinZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=351477) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=351477) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=EdvinZ))
   140. Legendary boltz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=353637) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=353637)  +1 / =2 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=boltz))
   141. Legendary yahoo62278 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=355846)  +20 / =2 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yahoo62278))
   142. Sr. Member ajiz138 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=364455) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=364455) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ajiz138))
   143. Hero Member SaracenRomero213 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366004) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366004) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SaracenRomero213))
   144. Legendary daniahya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=367891) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=367891) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=daniahya))
   145. Legendary ronaldo40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373301) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=373301) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ronaldo40))
   146. Legendary wildan88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=373947) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=373947) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wildan88))
   147. Legendary safari88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=378112) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=378112) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=safari88))
   148. Hero Member andycarrol (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=378130) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=378130) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=andycarrol))
   149. Hero Member marcous (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=378857) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=378857) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=marcous))
   150. Sr. Member laiyskylone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=387329) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=387329) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=laiyskylone))
   151. Hero Member Falconer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=387572) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=387572) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Falconer))
   152. Hero Member secone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=387580) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=387580) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=secone))
   153. Sr. Member BlackBaron (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=388819) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=388819) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BlackBaron))
   154. Legendary sureshnsnet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=390080) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=390080)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sureshnsnet))
   155. Legendary darkangel11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=393159) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=393159) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=darkangel11))
   156. Hero Member luckyflop (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=393201) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=393201) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=luckyflop))
   157. Legendary 7788bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=395871) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=395871) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=7788bitcoin))


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 05:45:14 PM
   158. Legendary ChrisPop (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=399267) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=399267)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ChrisPop))
   159. Sr. Member booktiger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401468) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=401468) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=booktiger))
   160. Legendary avatar_kiyoshi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401711) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=401711) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=avatar_kiyoshi))
   161. Legendary kronkodil (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=401909) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=401909) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kronkodil))
   162. Sr. Member sazonk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=402414) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=402414) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sazonk))
   163. Legendary Real-Duke (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=405482) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=405482) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Real-Duke))
   164. Legendary adroitful_one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=407213) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=407213)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=adroitful_one))
   165. Sr. Member Xxmodded (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=407449) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=407449) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Xxmodded))
   166. Legendary dimox (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=407887) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=407887) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dimox))
   167. Sr. Member irsykes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=408237) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=408237) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=irsykes))
   168. Hero Member Paycoinzzz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=408558) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=408558) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Paycoinzzz))
   169. Hero Member hendra147 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=410203) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=410203) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hendra147))
   170. Hero Member ashmodeus (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=410218) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=410218) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ashmodeus))
   171. Legendary aubert (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=410589) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=410589) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=aubert))
   172. Hero Member topbitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=423165) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=423165) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=topbitcoin))
   173. Legendary CjMapope (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=443338) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=443338)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CjMapope))
   174. Legendary The Young Turk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=453207) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=453207) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=The Young Turk))
   175. Hero Member X-ray (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459032) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=459032) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=X-ray))
   176. Hero Member Landak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=462517) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=462517) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Landak))
   177. Sr. Member asus09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=466116) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=466116) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asus09))
   178. Legendary Republikcoin.com (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=470478) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=470478) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Republikcoin.com))
   179. Legendary Mento (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=486605) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=486605) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Mento))
   180. Sr. Member Dr_Victor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=491891) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=491891) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Dr_Victor))
   181. Legendary agustina2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=500899) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=500899)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=agustina2))
   182. Legendary cabsav (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=502963) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=502963) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cabsav))
   183. Legendary EdenHazard (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505752) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=505752) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=EdenHazard))
   184. Legendary shinratensei_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=505965) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=505965) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=shinratensei_))
   185. Hero Member dannybrown (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=509189) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=509189) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dannybrown))
   186. Hero Member wxa7115 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=509190) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=509190) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wxa7115))
   187. Sr. Member bobyhodob (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=510702) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=510702) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bobyhodob))
   188. Sr. Member supercanada1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=512983) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=512983) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=supercanada1))
   189. Legendary MetalEngine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=513803) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=513803) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MetalEngine))
   190. Hero Member Adriano2010 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=514126) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=514126) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Adriano2010))
   191. Legendary BitcoinHunt3r (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=515719) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=515719) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BitcoinHunt3r))
   192. Hero Member koinsever (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=516583) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=516583)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=koinsever))
   193. Legendary Amel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=519514) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=519514) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Amel))
   194. Hero Member karanggatak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=521957) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=521957) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=karanggatak))
   195. Hero Member iddqdidkfa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=522791) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=522791) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iddqdidkfa))
   196. Sr. Member SummerBliss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=523028) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=523028) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SummerBliss))
   197. Legendary InvoKing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525058) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=525058) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=InvoKing))
   198. Legendary amacar2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=526294) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=526294) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=amacar2))
   199. Legendary danherbias07 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=526910) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=526910) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=danherbias07))
   200. Hero Member nimogsm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=532686) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=532686)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nimogsm))
   201. Hero Member Furious 7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=537726) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=537726) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Furious 7))
   202. Legendary Shinpako09 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=538387) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=538387)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Shinpako09))
   203. Legendary YuginKadoya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=542292) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=542292) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=YuginKadoya))
   204. Sr. Member 3DBrushes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=545031) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=545031) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=3DBrushes))
   205. Sr. Member barabarian1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=545893) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=545893) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=barabarian1))
   206. Sr. Member coin_gambler (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=547405) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=547405) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=coin_gambler))
   207. Sr. Member universe_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=547412) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=547412) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=universe_))
   208. Sr. Member takingthis4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=547602) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=547602) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=takingthis4))
   209. Legendary buyinbtc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=548943) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=548943) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=buyinbtc))
   210. Hero Member rekinthis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=548945) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=548945) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=rekinthis))
   211. Sr. Member pearnapple (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=548983) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=548983) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pearnapple))
   212. Hero Member $crypto$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=549786) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=549786) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=$crypto$))
   213. Hero Member affandi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=551007) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=551007) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=affandi))
   214. Sr. Member Heartilly (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=551372) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=551372) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Heartilly))
   215. Legendary SPQRCoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=551559) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=551559) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SPQRCoin))
   216. Sr. Member useless4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552972) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=552972) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=useless4))
   217. Sr. Member ontrackk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552974) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=552974) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ontrackk))
   218. Sr. Member funbarrel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552978) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=552978) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=funbarrel))
   219. Sr. Member potatopower (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552983) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=552983) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=potatopower))
   220. Sr. Member purebitco (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552985) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=552985) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=purebitco))
   221. Sr. Member fireball4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553235) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553235) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fireball4))
   222. Sr. Member angryswamp (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553242) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553242) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=angryswamp))
   223. Legendary JaredKaragen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553724) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553724) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JaredKaragen))
   224. Legendary iv4n (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553902) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553902) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iv4n))
   225. Hero Member Free1bitco.in (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=555236) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=555236) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Free1bitco.in))
   226. Legendary jakelyson (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=555534) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=555534) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=jakelyson))
   227. Legendary bileq (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=555858) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=555858) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bileq))
   228. Hero Member bitcoinst (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=555953) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=555953) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitcoinst))
   229. Hero Member bestcoins1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556241) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=556241) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bestcoins1))
   230. Sr. Member Aabcde (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556616) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=556616) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aabcde))
   231. Hero Member darewaller (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=557005) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=darewaller))
   232. Hero Member redsun114 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558226) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=558226) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=redsun114))
   233. Sr. Member naira (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558481) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=558481) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=naira))
   234. Legendary socks435 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558519) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=558519) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=socks435))
   235. Hero Member perla (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558703) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=558703) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=perla))
   236. Sr. Member udidrone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=558704) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=558704) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=udidrone))
   237. Hero Member pobs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=560594) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=560594) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pobs))
   238. Hero Member JanpriX (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=561804) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=561804) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JanpriX))
   239. Sr. Member BigBos (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=564961) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=564961) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BigBos))
   240. Sr. Member gost111 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=566884) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=566884)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=gost111))
   241. Legendary target (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=581624) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=581624) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=target))
   242. Hero Member error08 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=587882) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=587882) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=error08))
   243. Legendary FutureBitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=592311) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=592311) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FutureBitcoin))
   244. Hero Member ice18 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=603397) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=603397)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ice18))
   245. Legendary johhnyUA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=623643)  +0 / =0 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=johhnyUA))
   246. Legendary electronicash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=638831) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=638831) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=electronicash))
   247. Hero Member Spacewalker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=639327) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=639327) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Spacewalker))
   248. Legendary freedomgo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=639420) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=639420)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=freedomgo))
   249. Legendary ultrloa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=639435) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=639435) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ultrloa))
   250. Legendary Strongkored (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640554) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=640554) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Strongkored))
   251. Hero Member dodgrad (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640564) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=640564) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dodgrad))
   252. Hero Member jeks (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=653809) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=653809) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=jeks))
   253. Hero Member Palider (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662288) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=662288) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Palider))
   254. Legendary Pamadar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662318) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=662318) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Pamadar))
   255. Hero Member dwyane36 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662559) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=662559) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dwyane36))
   256. Hero Member HabBear (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662570) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=662570) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=HabBear))
   257. Hero Member virasisog (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=664839) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=664839) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=virasisog))
   258. Legendary asriloni (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=664960) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=664960) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asriloni))
   259. Hero Member Casdinyard (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=665309) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=665309) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Casdinyard))
   260. Sr. Member Yaunfitda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=665441) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=665441) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Yaunfitda))
   261. Sr. Member Gatotare (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667872) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667872) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Gatotare))
   262. Legendary Kemarit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667916) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667916) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kemarit))
   263. Hero Member Lanatsa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667920) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667920) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lanatsa))
   264. Sr. Member Muhtaixa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667924) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667924) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Muhtaixa))
   265. Sr. Member Wapfika (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=667946) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=667946) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wapfika))
   266. Hero Member Apened (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=668247) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=668247) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Apened))
   267. Hero Member Beparanf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669148) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=669148) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Beparanf))
   268. Sr. Member Fappanu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669157) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=669157) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fappanu))
   269. Hero Member Naficopa (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669241) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=669241) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Naficopa))
   270. Legendary daarul50 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=672808) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=672808) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=daarul50))
   271. Sr. Member Gotumoot (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=675425) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=675425) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Gotumoot))
   272. Hero Member Teraboy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=677982) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=677982) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Teraboy))
   273. Hero Member bamboylee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=687488) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=687488) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bamboylee))
   274. Sr. Member Zionatin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=697369) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=697369) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Zionatin))
   275. Hero Member Script3d (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=697888) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=697888) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Script3d))
   276. Sr. Member Hallmader (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698356) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=698356) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hallmader))
   277. Hero Member QueenW (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=703888) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=703888) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=QueenW))
   278. Sr. Member DaMut (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=704717) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=704717) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DaMut))
   279. Hero Member mobilestrike (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=709956) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=709956) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mobilestrike))
   280. Hero Member FLoving (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=715456) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=715456) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FLoving))
   281. Sr. Member Xsinx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=717573) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=717573) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Xsinx))
   282. Hero Member Oilacris (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=721555) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=721555) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Oilacris))
   283. Sr. Member mu77aL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=726539) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=726539)  +0 / =0 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=mu77aL))
   284. Hero Member clickerz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=727585) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=727585) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=clickerz))
   285. Sr. Member Eugenar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=733312) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=733312) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Eugenar))
   286. Sr. Member Faxmate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=733325) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=733325) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Faxmate))
   287. Sr. Member Getmon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=734434) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=734434) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Getmon))
   288. Hero Member apoorvlathey (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=735878) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=735878)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=apoorvlathey))
   289. Hero Member TopT3ns (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=738666) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=738666) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TopT3ns))
   290. Hero Member poptok1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=741872) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=741872)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=poptok1))
   291. Hero Member Maslate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=745781) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=745781) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Maslate))
   292. Sr. Member Opekin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=747042) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=747042) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Opekin))
   293. Hero Member Taskford (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=751988) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=751988) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Taskford))
   294. Sr. Member Visbay (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=753055) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=753055) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Visbay))
   295. Sr. Member TedMosby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=753396) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=753396) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TedMosby))
   296. Hero Member arwin100 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=755235) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=755235)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=arwin100))
   297. Hero Member MI6 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=756924) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=756924) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MI6))
   298. Hero Member Blitzboy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=757577) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=757577)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Blitzboy))
   299. Sr. Member Eternad (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=762147) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=762147) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Eternad))
   300. Hero Member SM23031997 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=764381) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=764381)  +5 / =3 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SM23031997))
   301. Hero Member Ailmand (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=770367) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=770367) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Ailmand))
   302. Sr. Member outatime1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=771512) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=771512) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=outatime1))
   303. Sr. Member Wexnident (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=772456) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=772456) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wexnident))
   304. Sr. Member Genemind (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=774789) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=774789) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Genemind))
   305. Hero Member Inkdatar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=775064) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=775064) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Inkdatar))
   306. Hero Member Mahanton (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=775282) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=775282) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Mahanton))
   307. Sr. Member Asmonist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=777628) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=777628) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Asmonist))
   308. Hero Member Sanitough (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=782805) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=782805)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Sanitough))
   309. Hero Member Slow death (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=783422) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=783422)  +3 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Slow death))
   310. Sr. Member moviebuff777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=786112) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=786112) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=moviebuff777))
   311. Hero Member murazor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=788447) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=788447) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=murazor))
   312. Sr. Member BitcoinsGreat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=789757) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=789757) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BitcoinsGreat))
   313. Hero Member bittraffic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=790707) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=790707) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bittraffic))
   314. Hero Member Distinctin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=798218) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=798218) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Distinctin))
   315. Sr. Member Javi_Anibarro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=805741) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=805741) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Javi_Anibarro))
   316. Hero Member Coin_trader (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=807453) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=807453)  +3 / =2 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Coin_trader))
   317. Hero Member Text (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=807536) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=807536) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Text))
   318. Hero Member doomistake (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=809433) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=809433) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=doomistake))
   319. Sr. Member suryana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=810822) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=810822) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suryana))


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 05:45:23 PM
   320. Hero Member dimonstration (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=810879) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=810879) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dimonstration))
   321. Sr. Member Hamphser (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=812414) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=812414) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hamphser))
   322. Hero Member Murat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=815246) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=815246)  +7 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Murat))
   323. Sr. Member Insanerman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=815650) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=815650) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Insanerman))
   324. Hero Member blockman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=816893) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=816893) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=blockman))
   325. Hero Member gabmen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=819237) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=819237) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=gabmen))
   326. Hero Member VanDeinsberg12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=819638) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=819638)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=VanDeinsberg12))
   327. Sr. Member Hypnosis00 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=819696) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=819696) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hypnosis00))
   328. Hero Member JeffBrad12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=820366) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=820366) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JeffBrad12))
   329. Hero Member vincetcm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=820441) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=820441) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=vincetcm))
   330. Hero Member rocku12345 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=820869) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=820869)  +0 / =0 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=rocku12345))
   331. Sr. Member iamsange (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=822995) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=822995) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iamsange))
   332. Sr. Member inanilujimi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825076) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=825076) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=inanilujimi))
   333. Sr. Member matchi2011 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825209) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=825209) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=matchi2011))
   334. Sr. Member pikkie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825625) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=825625) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pikkie))
   335. Sr. Member MyIdeas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=825795) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=825795) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MyIdeas))
   336. Hero Member carlisle1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=826292) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=826292) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=carlisle1))
   337. Sr. Member Chmel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=828530) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=828530) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Chmel))
   338. Hero Member Aqualung89 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=831340) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=831340) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aqualung89))
   339. Sr. Member panganib999 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=833483) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=833483) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=panganib999))
   340. Hero Member hyudien (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=833860) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=833860) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hyudien))
   341. Hero Member Mike Mayor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=836754) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=836754) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Mike Mayor))
  342. Hero Member IconFirm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841288) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=841288)  +2 / =1 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=IconFirm)) <-- "My sig contains a warning about the Yobit scammers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219538.msg53684328#msg53684328)"
   343. Sr. Member iamaruf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=844067) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=844067) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iamaruf))
   344. Hero Member cabron (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=844178) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=844178) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cabron))
   345. Sr. Member Lauren Smith (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=845797) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=845797) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lauren Smith))
   346. Sr. Member d3nz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=853856) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=853856) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=d3nz))
   347. Hero Member Cent21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=854571) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=854571) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Cent21))
   348. Sr. Member Oceat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=854798) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=854798) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Oceat))
   349. Sr. Member yulionoo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856630) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=856630) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yulionoo))
   350. Sr. Member albrots (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856684) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=856684) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=albrots))
   351. Sr. Member posi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=859197) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=859197) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=posi))
   352. Hero Member tungaqhd (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=859454) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=859454) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tungaqhd))
   353. Sr. Member red4slash (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=860505) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=860505) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=red4slash))
   354. Sr. Member Astvile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=862738) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=862738) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Astvile))
   355. Hero Member Rodeo02 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=863277) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=863277) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Rodeo02))
   356. Sr. Member MURONDI (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=863461) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=863461) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MURONDI))
   357. Sr. Member bassbity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=864585) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=864585) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bassbity))
   358. Sr. Member Lagduf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=865260) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=865260) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lagduf))
   359. Sr. Member bitvalak (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=871522) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=871522) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitvalak))
   360. Hero Member Blowon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=871585) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=871585) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Blowon))
   361. Sr. Member Fatunad (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=872800) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=872800) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fatunad))
   362. Hero Member doomloop (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874611) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874611) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=doomloop))
   363. Sr. Member Raflesia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=875466) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=875466) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Raflesia))
   364. Sr. Member Sterbens (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=875468) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=875468) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Sterbens))
   365. Sr. Member Lecam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882117) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=882117) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lecam))
   366. Sr. Member Darooghe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882214) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=882214) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Darooghe))
   367. Sr. Member cryp24x (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882414) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=882414) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cryp24x))
   368. Hero Member ragavancoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=883684) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=883684) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ragavancoin))
   369. Full Member blurryeyed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=885996) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=885996)  +3 / =3 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=blurryeyed))
   370. Sr. Member Captain Corporate (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=886094) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=886094)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Captain Corporate))
   371. Sr. Member olesya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=887265) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=887265) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=olesya))
   372. Hero Member finaleshot2016 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=888099) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=888099)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=finaleshot2016))
   373. Hero Member kassex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=888150) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=888150) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kassex))
   374. Hero Member Doell (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=888614) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=888614) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Doell))
   375. Sr. Member greek1313 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=889102) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=889102) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=greek1313))
   376. Hero Member coin-investor (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=891131) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=891131) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=coin-investor))
   377. Sr. Member CryptoGirl.y (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=891464) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=891464) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CryptoGirl.y))
   378. Hero Member SaShiRaJaVu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=892344) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=892344) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SaShiRaJaVu))
   379. Sr. Member Pelunize12 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=892936) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=892936) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Pelunize12))
   380. Hero Member Clement Kaliyar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=893236) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=893236) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Clement Kaliyar))
   381. Sr. Member SUPERSAIAN (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=894012) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894012) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=SUPERSAIAN))
   382. Sr. Member Warkop (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=894091) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894091) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Warkop))
   383. Sr. Member btcdie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=894358) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894358) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=btcdie))
   384. Sr. Member AicecreaME (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=894795) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=894795) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=AicecreaME))
   385. Hero Member Cacingkemi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=895005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=895005) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Cacingkemi))
   386. Hero Member Omega Weapon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897333) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Omega Weapon))
   387. Sr. Member aomakun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897809) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897809) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=aomakun))
   388. Hero Member arimamib (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897884) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897884) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=arimamib))
   389. Sr. Member imutlinda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897892) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897892) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=imutlinda))
   390. Hero Member NikiForCrypt (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=899486) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=899486) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=NikiForCrypt))
   391. Sr. Member Aceeakell (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=900390) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=900390) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aceeakell))
   392. Hero Member audaciousbeing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=901383) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=901383) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=audaciousbeing))
   393. Hero Member V1saya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=901489) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=901489) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=V1saya))
   394. Sr. Member bitcampaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=905392) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=905392) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitcampaign))
   395. Sr. Member samuraijin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=905398) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=905398) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=samuraijin))
   396. Member pnuts2012 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=905639) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=905639) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pnuts2012))
   397. Sr. Member Helloween (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906131) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=906131) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Helloween))
   398. Hero Member Nibelung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906919) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=906919) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Nibelung))
   399. Sr. Member prince V (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=907179) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=907179) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=prince V))
   400. Hero Member Silberman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=907642) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=907642) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Silberman))
   401. Sr. Member shodik007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=908866) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=908866)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=shodik007))
   402. Sr. Member bettercrypto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=908982) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=908982) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bettercrypto))
   403. Sr. Member bitcoindusts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=909338) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=909338) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitcoindusts))
   404. Sr. Member onyek16M (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=910392) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=910392) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=onyek16M))
   405. Sr. Member Sahyadri (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911871) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=911871) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Sahyadri))
   406. Sr. Member Jiyens3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=912461) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=912461) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jiyens3))
   407. Sr. Member fickiy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=913488) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=913488) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fickiy))
   408. Sr. Member MancyZz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=914032) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=914032) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MancyZz))
   409. Sr. Member carriebee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=914898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=914898) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=carriebee))
   410. Sr. Member meliodas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=915706) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=915706) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=meliodas))
   411. Sr. Member Wintersoldier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=915914) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=915914) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Wintersoldier))
   412. Sr. Member JC btc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=916474) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=916474) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JC btc))
   413. Sr. Member AbuBhakar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=916855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=916855) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=AbuBhakar))
   414. Sr. Member tambok (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=916983) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=916983) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tambok))
   415. Sr. Member bohr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=917122) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=917122) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bohr))
   416. Sr. Member White Christmas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=918769) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=918769) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=White Christmas))
   417. Sr. Member alexsandria (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=918943) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=918943) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=alexsandria))
   418. Sr. Member stephanirain (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=919012) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=919012) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=stephanirain))
   419. Sr. Member akmal1984 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=919324) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=919324) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=akmal1984))
   420. Sr. Member Cimmy_revenger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=919997) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=919997) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Cimmy_revenger))
   421. Sr. Member Kambal2000 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920397) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=920397) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kambal2000))
   422. Sr. Member lukax8 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=920922) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=920922) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=lukax8))
   423. Sr. Member Aying (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=921167) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=921167) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aying))
   424. Sr. Member crisanto01 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=921184) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=921184) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=crisanto01))
   425. Sr. Member makolz26 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=921205) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=921205) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=makolz26))
   426. Sr. Member Experia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=922188) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=922188) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Experia))
   427. Sr. Member anjiitem (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=922286) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=922286) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=anjiitem))
   428. Sr. Member the rise (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=922508) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=922508) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=the rise))
   429. Sr. Member cotton ball (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=923717) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=923717) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cotton ball))
   430. Sr. Member smyslov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=924304) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=924304) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=smyslov))
   431. Sr. Member oktana (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=924590) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=924590) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=oktana))
   432. Sr. Member sayaya17 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=924739) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=924739) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sayaya17))
   433. Sr. Member angrybirdy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=925081) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=925081) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=angrybirdy))
   434. Sr. Member boris singer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=926011) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=926011) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=boris singer))
   435. Sr. Member LittleHamster (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=926367) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=926367) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LittleHamster))
   436. Sr. Member xLays (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=926962) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=926962) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xLays))
   437. Sr. Member valuater (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=928752) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=928752) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=valuater))
   438. Sr. Member merchantofzeny (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=929358) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=929358) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=merchantofzeny))
   439. Sr. Member Question123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=930020) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=930020) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Question123))
   440. Sr. Member alisonwonder (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=930156) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=930156) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=alisonwonder))
   441. Sr. Member BitDane (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=931927) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=931927) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BitDane))
   442. Sr. Member BeManga (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=932479) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=932479) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=BeManga))
   443. Sr. Member HabiebRiziq (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=936010) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=936010) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=HabiebRiziq))
   444. Sr. Member chip1994 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=936935) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=936935) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=chip1994))
   445. Sr. Member yoseph (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=937250) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=937250) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yoseph))
   446. Sr. Member tippytoes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=939041) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=939041) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tippytoes))
   447. Sr. Member Karmakid (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=939560) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=939560) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Karmakid))
   448. Sr. Member Mihaylovic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=941248) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=941248)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Mihaylovic))
   449. Sr. Member Aikidoka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942026) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=942026) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aikidoka))
   450. Sr. Member kolonel_x (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942058) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=942058) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kolonel_x))
   451. Sr. Member Sadlife (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942484) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=942484) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Sadlife))
   452. Sr. Member radjie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942755) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=942755) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=radjie))
   453. Sr. Member StephenieDuong (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=943538) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=943538) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=StephenieDuong))
   454. Sr. Member Periodik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=946018) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=946018) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Periodik))
   455. Sr. Member watergold (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=946210) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=946210) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=watergold))
   456. Sr. Member Fundamentals Of (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=947116) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=947116) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fundamentals Of))
   457. Sr. Member Polar91 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=947291) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=947291) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Polar91))
   458. Sr. Member trumpman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=947421) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=947421) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=trumpman))
   459. Sr. Member Clark05 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=947510) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=947510) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Clark05))
   460. Sr. Member xvids (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=948175) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=948175) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xvids))
   461. Sr. Member gabbie2010 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=949294) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=949294) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=gabbie2010))
   462. Sr. Member Aveatrex (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950474) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=950474)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aveatrex))
   463. Hero Member otto_diesel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=951020) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=951020)  +1 / =1 / -2) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=otto_diesel))
   464. Sr. Member MMysterious (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=951535) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=951535) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MMysterious))
   465. Sr. Member Images21 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=951685) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=951685) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Images21))
   466. Sr. Member NathanJB (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=952672) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=952672) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=NathanJB))
   467. Sr. Member Harriti (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=953900) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=953900) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Harriti))
   468. Sr. Member k@suy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=955413) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=955413) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=k@suy))
   469. Sr. Member abakr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=956398) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=956398) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=abakr))
   470. Sr. Member wajik-tempe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=959284) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=959284) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wajik-tempe))
   471. Sr. Member Kupid002 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=960853) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=960853) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kupid002))
   472. Sr. Member Xcode7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=963211) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=963211) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Xcode7))
   473. Sr. Member Meowth05 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=963432) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=963432) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Meowth05))
   474. Sr. Member baskanx (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=965701) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=965701) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=baskanx))
   475. Sr. Member Myfe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=966127) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=966127) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Myfe))
   476. Sr. Member Pinkris128 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=966733) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=966733) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Pinkris128))
   477. Sr. Member Bim abk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=966799) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=966799) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Bim abk))
   478. Sr. Member Dart18 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=967045) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=967045) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Dart18))
   479. Sr. Member CarnagexD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=967589) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=967589) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CarnagexD))
   480. Sr. Member Eclipse26 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=968575) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=968575) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Eclipse26))
   481. Sr. Member Zeke_23 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=969898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=969898) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Zeke_23))
   482. Sr. Member bitzizzix (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=970225) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=970225) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bitzizzix))
   483. Sr. Member Chainsmokers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=970667) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=970667) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Chainsmokers))
   484. Sr. Member agentx44 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971414) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=971414) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=agentx44))
   485. Sr. Member balmut (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=971430) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=971430) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=balmut))
   486. Sr. Member revizorro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=972109) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=972109) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=revizorro))
   487. Sr. Member bigon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=972196) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=972196) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bigon))
   488. Sr. Member keeee (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=972916) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=972916) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=keeee))
   489. Sr. Member Kersh768 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=973462) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=973462) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kersh768))
   490. Sr. Member FPG (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=973585) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=973585) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FPG))
   491. Sr. Member kapalmabur (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=975464) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=975464) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kapalmabur))
   492. Sr. Member Colt81 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=975546) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=975546) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Colt81))
   493. Hero Member Saint-loup (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=975910) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=975910)  +1 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Saint-loup))
   494. Sr. Member Obito (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976373) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976373) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Obito))
   495. Sr. Member salad daging (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976441) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976441) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=salad daging))
   496. Sr. Member tianglistrik (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=977449) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=977449) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tianglistrik))
   497. Sr. Member DabsPoorVersion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=977632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=977632) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DabsPoorVersion))
   498. Sr. Member bangjoe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978497) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=978497) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bangjoe))
   499. Sr. Member Bonenx14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=978651) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=978651) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Bonenx14))
   500. Sr. Member TheCoinGrabber (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=981934) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=981934) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TheCoinGrabber))
   501. Legendary Vispilio (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=982288) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=982288)  +6 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Vispilio))
   502. Sr. Member 4FF (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=982534) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=982534) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=4FF))
   503. Sr. Member airdnasxela (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=983929) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=983929) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=airdnasxela))
   504. Sr. Member bounceback (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=985418) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=985418) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=bounceback))
   505. Sr. Member Bezobraznike (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=985840) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=985840) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Bezobraznike))
   506. Sr. Member ecnalubma (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=986072) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986072) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ecnalubma))
   507. Sr. Member Dickiy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=986645) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986645) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Dickiy))
   508. Sr. Member Shadowkipper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988720) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=988720) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Shadowkipper))
   509. Sr. Member huu78 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988947) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=988947) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=huu78))
   510. Sr. Member Oneandpure (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=989143) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=989143) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Oneandpure))
   511. Sr. Member cutesgirl (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=989206) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=989206) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=cutesgirl))
   512. Sr. Member Shasha80 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=991251) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=991251) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Shasha80))
   513. Sr. Member CryptoBry (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=994859) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=994859) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CryptoBry))
   514. Sr. Member nicolas1979 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=995294) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=995294) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nicolas1979))
   515. Sr. Member sisule (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=995399) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=995399) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sisule))
   516. Sr. Member terciduk123 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=995404) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=995404) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=terciduk123))
   517. Sr. Member blckhawk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=997120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=997120) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=blckhawk))
   518. Sr. Member kaneki007 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=997165) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=997165) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=kaneki007))
   519. Sr. Member DevilSlayer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=998116) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=998116) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=DevilSlayer))
   520. Sr. Member Savemore (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000248) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1000248) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Savemore))
   521. Sr. Member TitanGEL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000265) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1000265) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TitanGEL))
   522. Sr. Member LouVandetta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000368) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1000368) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=LouVandetta))
   523. Sr. Member Syndrome (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000574) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1000574) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Syndrome))
   524. Sr. Member JahriMeayer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1002521) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1002521) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JahriMeayer))
   525. Sr. Member 2tang (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1003532) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1003532) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=2tang))
   526. Sr. Member rijaljun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1004807) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1004807) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=rijaljun))
   527. Sr. Member naikturun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1005198) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1005198) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=naikturun))
   528. Sr. Member yslyv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006729) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1006729) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yslyv))
   529. Sr. Member drachman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1007334) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1007334) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=drachman))
   530. Sr. Member fuer44 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1009089) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1009089) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fuer44))
   531. Sr. Member spadormie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1013457) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1013457) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=spadormie))
   532. Hero Member Icygreen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1013952) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1013952)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Icygreen))
   533. Hero Member AlyattesLydia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1046135) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1046135) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=AlyattesLydia))
   534. Legendary PHI1618 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1071136) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1071136) #  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=PHI1618))
   535. Sr. Member Twentyonepaylots (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1075222) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1075222) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Twentyonepaylots))
   536. Hero Member igor72 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1094195) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1094195)  +2 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=igor72))
   537. Hero Member KTChampions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1097370) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1097370)  +6 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=KTChampions))
   538. Sr. Member gunhell16 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1101424) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1101424)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=gunhell16))
   539. Sr. Member tg88 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1112094) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1112094) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=tg88))
   540. Sr. Member Smartprofit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1117066) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1117066) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Smartprofit))
   541. Sr. Member Hc01 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1142012) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1142012)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Hc01))
   542. Sr. Member 3meek (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1193837) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1193837)  +0 / =0 / -1) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=3meek))
   543. Hero Member Bttzed03 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1239188) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1239188) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Bttzed03))
   544. Sr. Member trendcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1367217) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1367217)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=trendcoin))
   545. Hero Member witcher_sense (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1433865) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1433865)  +13 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=witcher_sense))
   546. Sr. Member wh1rlw1nd (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1711582) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1711582) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=wh1rlw1nd))
   547. Hero Member madnessteat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1894120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1894120)  +4 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=madnessteat))
   548. Member Kingf1sher (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1937052) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1937052) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Kingf1sher))
   549. Full Member yhiaali3 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2168312) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2168312) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yhiaali3))
   550. Hero Member FontSeli (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2221613) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2221613)  +1 / =0 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=FontSeli))
   551. Sr. Member jokers10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2497429) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2497429) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=jokers10))


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 05:50:30 PM
The following users (who posted in the past 7 days) have "X10" in their profile:
     1. Hero Member pajak666 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=58596) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=58596) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=pajak666))
     2. Legendary alyssa85 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105677) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=105677) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=alyssa85))
     3. Legendary iluvbitcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=337097) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=337097)  +21 / =2 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iluvbitcoins))
     4. Legendary MetalEngine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=513803) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=513803) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MetalEngine))
     5. Legendary InvoKing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525058) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=525058) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=InvoKing))
     6. Legendary iv4n (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553902) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=553902) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=iv4n))
     7. Sr. Member Lecam (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882117) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=882117) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lecam))
     8. Sr. Member JC btc (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=916474) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=916474) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JC btc))
     9. Sr. Member yoseph (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=937250) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=937250) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=yoseph))
    10. Sr. Member Aikidoka (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942026) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=942026) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Aikidoka))
    11. Sr. Member Obito (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976373) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976373) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Obito))
    12. Sr. Member Bezobraznike (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=985840) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=985840) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Bezobraznike))
    13. Legendary El duderino_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1067333)  +26 / =1 / -0) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=El duderino_)) <-- not yobit!


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: Lauda on January 23, 2020, 05:51:58 PM
Here's the list. Please note that I did a case insensitive search for "yobit" in all profiles that have posted in the last week. This means that someone with for instance "Fork yobit, they're forking scammers" in his signature is included too:
Thank you. I'll work under the assumption that less than 10% of the users have Yobit in their signature but are not actively advertising Yobit.

551.[/color] Sr. Member jokers10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2497429) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2497429) neutral) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=jokers10))
Wow. I didn't realize that it was this bad, forking hell. :-\


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: IconFirm on January 23, 2020, 05:54:21 PM
This means that someone with for instance "Fork yobit, they're forking scammers" in his signature is included too:

Great info. My sig contains a warning about the Yobit scammers - can you remove my name from the list please? (#342) I don't want to be associated with those crooks in any way.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 06:09:59 PM

Here's the list. Please note that I did a case insensitive search for "yobit" in all profiles that have posted in the last week. This means that someone with for instance "Fork yobit, they're forking scammers" in his signature is included too:

~snip~


Excellent work Loyce, thank you. The list is quite extensive, I never knew that many users were involved.

Just as IconFirm I also have listed YOBIT in my signature as a scam but I did not appear in the list. Thank heavens for that  ;D


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: LoyceV on January 23, 2020, 06:20:48 PM
I also have listed YOBIT in my signature as a scam
No you don't ;)


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 23, 2020, 06:43:29 PM
I also have listed YOBIT in my signature as a scam
No you don't ;)

 ;D ;D ;D

I get it now......

YSPACEOSPACEBSPACEISPACET


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: IconFirm on January 23, 2020, 07:34:00 PM
This means that someone with for instance "Fork yobit, they're forking scammers" in his signature is included too:

Great info. My sig contains a warning about the Yobit scammers - can you remove my name from the list please? (#342) I don't want to be associated with those crooks in any way.

Thanks.

Thank you for that LoyceV :)


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: nullius on January 23, 2020, 09:01:52 PM
Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

Good point.  New topic addressing this issue directly:  yahoo62278 and Yobit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220203.0), q.v.

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.

Though you are correct, I think that’s a small price to pay in the short term if we can stop Yobit scam advertising permanently.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: wolwoo on January 23, 2020, 09:27:58 PM
Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

Good point.  New topic addressing this issue directly:  yahoo62278 and Yobit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220203.0), q.v.

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.

Though you are correct, I think that’s a small price to pay in the short term if we can stop Yobit scam advertising permanently.

If you are sincere, you will drop yahoo from DT1. He is yobit's campaign manager and Dt1. If you are going to give negative feedback, give it to him first.
My messages are being deleted because I swear, I wrote this without swearing, let's see if it will be deleted again?

i said that


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: BitcoinSupremo on January 24, 2020, 08:51:50 PM
Lauda a plain scammer fighting against pseudo scammers. I know I have long been missing here but I am laughing for 10 minutes and 33 seconds exactly by reading the nonsenses that Lauda produces. Marvelous.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on January 25, 2020, 05:18:22 PM
Isn't Yahoo DT member and Yobit campaign manager also?
People are talking bad about everyone else except about Yahoo, that is something like taboo :)

Good point.  New topic addressing this issue directly:  yahoo62278 and Yobit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220203.0), q.v.

I don't like yobit, but I think opening so many topics about it you give it free advertisement.

Though you are correct, I think that’s a small price to pay in the short term if we can stop Yobit scam advertising permanently.


I can start envisaging the calmness around this place after a couple of days because Yobit thankfully have decided to promote their own scam on their own cryptotalk forum. Great news  ;D

Seems like all those posts have had some form of effect on Yobit so the small price to pay actually paid-off with the end result being the scammers have decided to stop promoting their scam here.


Title: Re: Should DT and Merit Source Members Be Promoting A Known Scam?
Post by: JollyGood on July 09, 2020, 01:50:16 PM
Considering the recent shenanigans by a couple of users associated with the main protagonist of this thread (scammer Vispillio) I think this thread deserved to be bumped and the link with the new thread added here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261058