|
Title: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: marlboroza on March 04, 2020, 03:30:51 PM Why oh my?
Case number one: Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not? No and no. [...] Of course, conversation continued in trolling spirit, tecshare again: Is not my rating for Vod valid? Are Vod's negative ratings for me not invalid? Convenient you suddenly can't be bothered when a direct question is asked. [...] Suchmoon replied again but tecshare continued with trolling: Is not my rating for Vod valid? Are Vod's negative ratings for me not invalid? Convenient you suddenly can't be bothered when a direct question is asked. I already answered in the shortest and most direct way possible, literally in the post you just quoted. I can't help you with your compulsive lying issue, sorry. You didn't answer my question. You responded to it, but you didn't actually answer it. Oh I am a compulsive liar now? Refractory projection much? Are you taking lessons out of Vod's book now? Trolling continued: Since you answered this question, please quote your answer for clarity, that is unless you are going to take another page from Vod's book and just keep claiming you did while never actually doing it. Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not? No and no. Stop using theymos as a crutch when it suits you. He also said "it'd be best to forgive". Until you, Og, and Vod start seriously working towards deescalation I can't be bothered to care about it anymore. Five minutes of being adults is all it takes. Look at Lauda+Quicksy = ♡. You can do it too, I believe in you, don't let me down. It seems pretty clear you didn't answer my question at all [...] It seems pretty clear you didn't answer my question at all Quit lying, the answer is right there, you just disagree with the "no". My agreement or disagreement is irrelevant. You in fact did not answer my questions. You replied, but you didn't answer them. That is not the same thing. Trolling continued and moderator at some point removed some posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53938737#msg53938737. Case number two: [...] This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure. Who forced me exactly ??? [...] [...] You were forced to do so by the same people advising you that these abusive ratings only make you look bad, like what happened just now. [...] Case number 3: ^ Don't be. Example: 1) find nutildah's post 2) say something irrelevant for topic(again) and make sure it is something about nutildah which will make them respond (it can be word or one sentence, but strong enough to cause reaction) I act because I don't enjoy my character being discussed this way. You're not the first member to be analyzed in this fashion and you certainly won't be the last. Weeks after getting on DT my reputation was thoroughly savaged. If you can't handle criticism then don't dish it out. If you must know, I distrusted you because I don't trust reformed shitposters that suddenly decide to take an interest in forum issues. You're trying too hard. Seems as if my instincts were correct here. You should have taken this as advice to tone it down a bit, but instead you ramped up your involvement in the drama even more. You apparently have lots of alt accounts on the forum which makes your obsession with DT (perhaps quest for eventual DT status as it would appear) even more disturbing. I want to be clear that I do not wish to pass any kind of judgment on hacker. That's all well and good Quickseller, and thanks for chiming in with your analysis, but could you please stop posting under both of your accounts in the same thread? Its getting rather insulting that you insist we pretend you're not Quickseller (you are -- I'd rather not open a thread in Reputation about it). If you're gonna post in a thread, stick with one account. Kind of weird that you are using an alt to post in a thread that is largely about alt accounts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of. 3) wait 4) nutildah replied, triggered by troll: Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of. When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. 5) Bingo! Continue to troll nutildah in not related thread 6) deflect thread more using "nutildah - bill gator" "argument" I mean I am not in control of any accounts accused above others than this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1329605) ( not logged in from 2 years ). K, doesn't mean you don't have alts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of. When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. That wasn't retribution. Retribution for what exactly? When I am talking about retribution in this context I am talking about abusing the trust system to punish people for speaking out. All I did was talk about your history here, I never used the trust system against you. That was me using your own standards against you to show what a total hypocrite you are as you run around accusing people of shit you yourself are guilty of. You were trying to destroy Bill Gator's rep for speaking out using the fact that he purchased the account as the sole crime he was supposedly guilty of, yet you yourself were engaged in the same activity. Yes yes, you claim you never actually sold it, but you can never prove that, and we all know how much you enjoy speculating, so lets use logical speculation to assume your account was sold too since you can't prove yourself innocent. See how much fun the guilty until proven innocent standard is? People like you Vod, and Suchgoon keep saying this kind of shit like it is just so obvious I am abusive of the trust system you need never actually give any examples. Then when I press the issue you just again pretend it is self evident and scurry off to your clown holes, or argue over meaningless shit until the topic is sufficiently slid to another subject. 7) hope nutildah will respond again 8 ) drag more people into trolling system 9) hope Vod and Suchmoon will reply 10) rinse and repeat Case number 4 (trolling using TRUST SYSTEM): Topic seems quiet lately :o Core tenets: 1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users. 2. Accusations without some form of documentation should be minimal. 3. Users who regularly and repeatedly ignore these standards should be excluded from trust lists. 4. Users who follow these standards should be included in trust lists. 5. Users who are subjected to accusations and ratings without any form of documentation should be defended and supported as much as possible. There is no inherent hierarchy. Anyone is free to call themselves a member of The Objective Standards Guild as long as they follow its tenets. Using the avatar below and linking to this thread in your signature is encouraged. Lets work together to bring a balance of power to this forum and check its culture of rampant and systemic abuse. Feel free to suggest your own inclusions and exclusions based on these standards. This is trust abuse according to rules of this guild, not to mention some ratings are real trust abuse (note: I didn't check references of unmarked negative trust ratings) https://i.imgur.com/xKvD0H9.png https://i.imgur.com/JazyVNg.png Quote 5. Users who are subjected to accusations and ratings without any form of documentation should be defended and supported as much as possible. Do correct thing @TECSHARE and thank you for this topic.He completely ignored this, like any other troll would... Cmon, let him act on this one to show he stands behind his words. Or maybe just let the topic die already since there's clearly nothing positive coming out of it? Objectivity was seemingly never the objective, heh. Maybe you can throw some more circular logic at me. This forum needs objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating or flagging in order to prevent abuse of the trust system that it self can be used to extort people into removing valid negative ratings or flags. Without this, it is a simple task to simply abuse the system to cover up crimes and abuses. None of the people objecting here want to have an honest debate about the topic, that is the problem. Nonsense! I want to have a honest debate about the topic, seems you don't. I don't see any logical explanation why you don't want to address these not-by-standards-suggested-inclusions-of-yours:BayAreaCoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53877436#msg53877436) HostFat (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53879374#msg53879374) bill gator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53879563#msg53879563) https://i.imgur.com/yueWTgL.png You invited me to topic, I have read it, you said I am trust abuser, you suggested to include those accounts (claiming they are by standards of this guild) and now I ask you why is something which you call trust abuse suggested inclusion? Can you please provide proof of connection https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53889824#msg53889824 Case number 8 TECSHARE VS moderator Flying Hellfish In topic about TECSHARE's removed off topic replies, TECSHARE accused moderator that he removed his own topic (it is documented by nutildah)... Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5065043.0 As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact. I did NOT delete my thread. [...] Of course, tecshare is not interested in any kind of discussion, he simple replied: Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated. (there are more tecshare's trolling in that topic) Case number 9 TECSHARE VS moderator: Accused moderator that he removed post, while flying hellfish said he didn't do it For the record, As with most of the claims in the locked thread about me this is not my doing (this being the latest as of this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg53786636#msg53786636 ) [...] [...] Since I didn't delete the post I don't know which thread it was in and in reality everything after that is entirely moot. ...Tecshare continued, even if it was explained to him several times... I think he just overlooked the possibility that you were responding to my post in a thread I didn't post in. Are you accusing him of lying about deleting your post? Seems unlikely to me, but this isn't the first time he has explicitly told you that he didn't delete a post from your "FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP" thread, and you seem to just not care. If you think he's lying, call him out on it and maybe we can get to the bottom of it. If you don't think he's lying, then remove the posts he says he didn't delete. Or do nothing if you don't care if your accusations against FH are accurate or not. I don't care what he did or says. A moderator deleted those posts, this is a fact as evidenced by the quotes. Him claiming not to have done it in a section he is in charge of and just saying it was "some one else" is not a resolution, even if he thinks it is for him. I have absolutely no way to verify anything he says. Me having a log of these acts harms no one, and the only reason this thread exists is so the usual dingle berries have some ass hair to cling on to and create a circus out of it. Be my guest. Clown away and draw even more attention to it. There are more examples, I will probably post them at some point so reserved... If anyone has example, feel free to send me PM and I will update topic. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: marlboroza on March 04, 2020, 03:31:06 PM reserved.
Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: marlboroza on March 04, 2020, 03:31:17 PM reserved
Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Vod on March 06, 2020, 08:12:28 AM Yes, Techy has been trolling for years. Thank you for providing a place to build our trolling case to Theymos.
I'll start with a recent one. Techy made an unfounded accusation against marlboroza. This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure. This is just his latest attempt to reinstate those abusive ratings. Marlboroza, public pressure is forcing you to re-add the justified negative, at least until Techy stops making false accusations like this. We've all been a victim of him, and it is very unfair to new members if they can't see it in his trust. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: nutildah on March 06, 2020, 09:07:17 AM Just thought this was relevant to the conversation:
I prefer to have an actual debate if my opponent is capable, but often they are not and resort to all kinds of illogical semantic games and personal attacks. At this point, yes I will absolutely troll them for my own amusement as well as to demonstrate their motivation of arguing from a position of lack of emotional control rather than logic. If you come at me with anything other than solid logic, one way or another I get my pound of flesh. Of course, he is the arbiter of what constitutes "illogical semantic games and personal attacks," so he gets to decide when his trolling is justified and when it isn't. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: bonesjonesreturns on March 06, 2020, 10:33:51 AM There is nothing there that meet the forums definition of trolling. Your denial of something that look entirely reasonable and probable is certainly not irrefutable proof tecshare is incorrect. You have history of red tag abuse. I note that before a thread analysing your motives and explanations have result in you yielding. Which add a significant support to his assertion.
"Hope" ? That you, suchmoon and nutildah will start commenting? You members are clearly stalking Tecshare. Please refrain from cry trolling when people provide an immovable obstacle in the path of your corrupt agenda. You don't like Tecshare then ignore Tecshare. Stop complaining and crying about senior members with impeccable trade histories. Focus your energy on real scammers like many of your dear friends. This constant bleating over possible minor infractions of your adversaries, while you support scammers and never come to meta to ask clarification on there scamming ways makes you appear deeply untrustworthy. No trolling from tecshare. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: hacker1001101001 on March 06, 2020, 11:56:04 AM Going against onces opinions is not trolling, so NO.
Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Vod on March 06, 2020, 12:09:47 PM Going against onces opinions is not trolling, so NO. No one claimed it was. This thread will provide eventual proof of trolling. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: bonesjonesreturns on March 06, 2020, 12:29:32 PM Going against onces opinions is not trolling, so NO. No one claimed it was. This thread will provide eventual proof of trolling. Eventually? If there is irrefutable conclusive proof of trolling it should be produce now or thread locked until eventually it is produced. No evidence so far to demonstrate trolling = Not trolling based on current evidence provided. Better to rid higher echelon scammers first then we can concern over possible trolling of scammers or their supporters. If you have to ask: is this trolling? Then either you don't understand the forums clear and sensible definition of trolling or you do not have the required evidence to demonstrate it is trolling, therefore it is not trolling. I can accommodate any queries or questions from members that do not still understand Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Vod on March 06, 2020, 01:04:43 PM Going against onces opinions is not trolling, so NO. No one claimed it was. This thread will provide eventual proof of trolling. Eventually? If there is irrefutable conclusive proof of trolling it should be produce now or thread locked until eventually it is produced. Trolling is a pattern of behavior. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: bonesjonesreturns on March 06, 2020, 02:07:02 PM Going against onces opinions is not trolling, so NO. No one claimed it was. This thread will provide eventual proof of trolling. Eventually? If there is irrefutable conclusive proof of trolling it should be produce now or thread locked until eventually it is produced. Trolling is a pattern of behavior. There is no pattern sufficient to demonstrate trolling that lacks irrefutable proof of a member presenting as true that which is conclusively false and the reverse. There can be no cumulative assorted examples, that build a pattern of possibly false or misleading statements that can ever demonstrate trolling. You need conclusive proof of that I mention above, and they have been made previously aware. It is this determined and deliberate intention to promulgate incorrect and misleading information that will warrant a ban. Remember this forum does not even ban proven scammers. That is why the requirement or threshold to be classified as a troll is set sensibly high. If it were simply mild teasing, sarcasm or triggering response then the forum would be greatly reduced. But The pattern that I observe is that of several members are stalking Tecshare. I don't essentially include you, as there is some long history of mutual dislike. The others though clearly appear to be attempting to silence his legitimate criticism of their scamming , or double standards. Your beef seems more of personal nature or mutual dislike. I don't feel you are to redeem yourself to your former highly respected and admired by continuing with old personal grudges thay seem to suggest you have forged an alliance with scammers. Better to rise above this and appear neutral and objective. The road to full redemption is not as yet that long for you. Get on it and start making your own way back. Being dragged into some alliance with scammers, extorted, and trust abusers is not good for your legacy. If I had been a very senior member of such repute I would take great care to not destroy those long years of great work and legacy for some bickering over nothing of great import. Not trolling. No pattern or list of not trolling can ever amount to trolling. You are in essence ask for a ban for a senior member with impeccable trust over many years. Temper your emotions. Perhaps just call a truce and stop antagonism both ways. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: DireWolfM14 on March 06, 2020, 03:41:05 PM I recon the point of this thread is to provide enough evidence of Tecshare's trolling to get him banned? I'm sorry if you guys think that's the right thing to do, but I disagree. I've recently been one of his targets, and I don't feel like it's such a big deal. Like many other aspects of life, we will have to deal with misinformation, lies, and attacks. By leaving it to the community to decide whether there's any validity to his claims, we take the higher ground. By looking at the DT1 list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview) we can see that his efforts are not very successful.
Just thought this was relevant to the conversation: I prefer to have an actual debate if my opponent is capable, but often they are not and resort to all kinds of illogical semantic games and personal attacks. At this point, yes I will absolutely troll them for my own amusement as well as to demonstrate their motivation of arguing from a position of lack of emotional control rather than logic. If you come at me with anything other than solid logic, one way or another I get my pound of flesh. Of course, he is the arbiter of what constitutes "illogical semantic games and personal attacks," so he gets to decide when his trolling is justified and when it isn't. It's really quite extraordinary how much deflection exists in that post you quoted. He'll attack people who disagree with him, call them names, refuse to see the logic in their arguments, and then point the finger at them and blame them for every thing for which he is guilty. But is that really enough of a reason to seek his banishment? Yes, it's true that he's a troll. One among a long list of trolls on this forum. This whole anti-Tecshare thing is starting to look like a witch hunt. I wish it would stop. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: suchmoon on March 06, 2020, 03:56:26 PM I recon the point of this thread is to provide enough evidence of Tecshare's trolling to get him banned? Yeah, ban is not gonna happen and this will just give him more things to whine about, more posts to report to mods and whine about that, et cetera. <imagine a "leave TECSHARE alone" meme here, I'm too lazy to make one> Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: nutildah on March 06, 2020, 04:08:22 PM I recon the point of this thread is to provide enough evidence of Tecshare's trolling to get him banned? I'm sorry if you guys think that's the right thing to do, but I disagree. I don't want him banned, I just want him to stop trolling. When's the last time he even made a comment about Bitcoin?? This is a forum about Bitcoin after all... But, I do understand, we don't all get what we want, and I can live with that. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: sirazimuth on March 06, 2020, 05:18:49 PM I’m amazed he hasn’t chimed in yet with the usual
“mob justice, clown car, stasi police, peanuts in my shit etc “ rant.... Or another lovely reeeeeeeee thread. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: bonesjonesreturns on March 06, 2020, 05:22:58 PM Why the 3 stalkers of tecshare are still discussing the non existing trolling of techare?
How can you be wishing for tecshare to refrain from something you have demonstrated (the evidence provided) that he has yet to do? Please stop humiliating yourselves like this. Suchmoon looks so bitchy and bitter. Lighten up sourpuss. Bring the conclusive evidence of trolling or please delete the thread Still waiting for supporting evidence for the tecshare trolling. Just one clear conclusive example of trolling would provide useful support for your claims. If you keep repeating it over and over and over but can not produce any examples then you will just look very silly. Better for you all to concede tecshare is not a troll. This forum is not "all" about bitcoin. It is rather a platform to foster support and pool ideas for decentralized trustless projects. Bitcoin is merely a part of the optimal decentralized environment that is the eventual goal. If a member was here for years and never produced one post directly referencing bitcoin that would by no means indicate they were a troll. This throwing everything else but evidence of trolling to support your argument of trolling is embarrassing. A for effort Fail for result. Can I have merits please for providing valuable strong argument? Merit is not for friends or popular opinion among a very tiny Group here is it? Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Vod on March 06, 2020, 09:01:36 PM I recon the point of this thread is to provide enough evidence of Tecshare's trolling to get him banned? You made a guess and everyone ran with it like it was the truth. Now Techy will claim for the next decade that I tried to get him banned, and public pressure saved him. ::) There are many things that can be done with a troll. Banning isn't always the answer. I’m amazed he hasn’t chimed in yet with the usual “mob justice, clown car, stasi police, peanuts in my shit etc “ rant.... Or another lovely reeeeeeeee thread. That was my intention. He wants the community to validate him, and it won't. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Quickseller on March 06, 2020, 09:26:24 PM With specific regards to the activity that will get you banned from the forum, he is not trolling and it would be inappropriate for him to be banned.
In the past, he had a problem with off topic posts to air his grievances, but that has not been an issue for quite some time now. I would argue this should factor in his favor (correcting previous rule breaking) if there was ever a serious question as to if he should be banned. If you don’t like what he is saying, your choices are 1) get his concerns addressed, 2) ignore him, 3) make an argument as to why he is wrong. (Note that calling out alleged hypocrisy is not in this list). Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Vod on March 06, 2020, 11:57:44 PM If you don’t like what he is saying, your choices are 1) get his concerns addressed, 2) ignore him, 3) make an argument as to why he is wrong. (Note that calling out alleged hypocrisy is not in this list). Thank goodness you can't force that choice on me. Try reading the thread, or at least the post right above yours. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Lauda on March 07, 2020, 07:33:56 AM In the past, he had a problem with off topic posts to air his grievances, but that has not been an issue for quite some time now. Are you really sure about that? Many threads have been infected, i.e. turned partially to discussing his nonsense only after he made off topic posts about it. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: marlboroza on March 07, 2020, 08:04:18 AM I wish it would stop. I wish his trolling would stop.[...] I've recently been one of his targets, and I don't feel like it's such a big deal. Like many other aspects of life, we will have to deal with misinformation, lies, and attacks. [...] Even if many users think "altcoin giveaway" is not big deal, it is still against forum rules to do "altcoin giveaway". The same goes for trolling:3. No trolling. Please link posts where Tecshare targeted you. He'll attack people who disagree with him, call them names, refuse to see the logic in their arguments, and then point the finger at them and blame them for every thing for which he is guilty. Can you link these posts as well?Yes, it's true that he's a troll. One among a long list of trolls on this forum. This whole anti-Tecshare thing is starting to look like a witch hunt. Elaborate this.You claim Tecshare is troll and on the other hand you said that it is starting to look like witch hunt. There is no anti-tecshare, there is troll who is trolling wherever he can and there are some users who will point his trolling. How is creating thread about user who is trolling == witch hunt? Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: xolxol on March 07, 2020, 10:40:54 AM Why are you complaining not the guy who's being trolled ? pussy like you shouldnt be whining about anyone's business,we know why because you're a piece of shit.
Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: DireWolfM14 on March 07, 2020, 07:05:59 PM I wish it would stop. I wish his trolling would stop.Me too, but if wishes were horses, beggars would ride. I guess neither, his trolling nor the threads pointing it all out will stop. But I don't see any benefit of either, so what's the point? Pointing out his trolling isn't going to get him banned. It didn't work for Thule or cryptohunter, who (in my opinion) would be far more deserving of a "troll ban" than Tecshare. So what makes you think it's going to get Tecshare banned? Again, I'm assuming that's the point of this thread, if I'm wrong please correct me. ~ Please link posts where Tecshare targeted you. ~ Can you link these posts as well? ~ Elaborate this. I'm not sure what your reasons are for asking me for all this evidence. Do you think it'll cause me to change my mind about this thread or do you think I'm making it up? Suffice it to say the evidence exists, but I'm not interested in spending any time digging through his numerous posts where he's called me out. You claim Tecshare is troll and on the other hand you said that it is starting to look like witch hunt. There is no anti-tecshare, there is troll who is trolling wherever he can and there are some users who will point his trolling. How is creating thread about user who is trolling == witch hunt? My assumptions, which I've already admitted cause me to think the point of this thread to get Tecshare banned. That would make it a witch-hunt. I started my first post in this thread with a question, if I'm wrong correct me. If this thread is nothing more than a showcase of Tecshare's trolling then it seems even more pointless. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: Quickseller on March 08, 2020, 03:16:23 AM If you don’t like what he is saying, your choices are 1) get his concerns addressed, 2) ignore him, 3) make an argument as to why he is wrong. (Note that calling out alleged hypocrisy is not in this list). Thank goodness you can't force that choice on me. Try reading the thread, or at least the post right above yours. I do think that life is way too short to feuding with TS as much as you do. Who cares if you are right or not, or if you “win”. I don’t see anything meaningful that you will possibly get out of any feud with him. Go for a hike, relax on your back porch, do something else relaxing, do something more enjoyable. I don’t think TS is going to hurt anyone. In the past, he had a problem with off topic posts to air his grievances, but that has not been an issue for quite some time now. Are you really sure about that? Many threads have been infected, i.e. turned partially to discussing his nonsense only after he made off topic posts about it. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: marlboroza on March 08, 2020, 09:29:06 AM I'm not sure what your reasons are for asking me for all this evidence. Well, thread is collection of his trolling, you said you and other users have been attacked and trolled by tecshare so I asked you to post it here. Suffice it to say the evidence exists, but I'm not interested in spending any time digging through his numerous posts where he's called me out. Fair enough. My assumptions, which I've already admitted cause me to think the point of this thread to get Tecshare banned. That would make it a witch-hunt. I started my first post in this thread with a question, if I'm wrong correct me. If this thread is nothing more than a showcase of Tecshare's trolling then it seems even more pointless. Creating thread about his trolling is not a witch-hunt. Him being long time here and having trading history doesn't justify his constant trolling.I am not asking for a ban, if anything will get him banned it will happen because of something he did himself. It is very simple, every time tecshare start trolling it should be documented, if he stop trolling there will be nothing to document, but that will mean, well, that he stop trolling. That should be positive outcome. Title: Re: Tecshare is trolling!??? Post by: bonesjonesreturns on March 09, 2020, 12:19:11 PM I'm not sure what your reasons are for asking me for all this evidence. Well, thread is collection of his trolling, you said you and other users have been attacked and trolled by tecshare so I asked you to post it here. Suffice it to say the evidence exists, but I'm not interested in spending any time digging through his numerous posts where he's called me out. Fair enough. My assumptions, which I've already admitted cause me to think the point of this thread to get Tecshare banned. That would make it a witch-hunt. I started my first post in this thread with a question, if I'm wrong correct me. If this thread is nothing more than a showcase of Tecshare's trolling then it seems even more pointless. Creating thread about his trolling is not a witch-hunt. Him being long time here and having trading history doesn't justify his constant trolling.I am not asking for a ban, if anything will get him banned it will happen because of something he did himself. It is very simple, every time tecshare start trolling it should be documented, if he stop trolling there will be nothing to document, but that will mean, well, that he stop trolling. That should be positive outcome. Why you still making these highly negative and unsubstantiated claims Marlboroza? Please present the clearly debunked and undeniably false information that tecshare is knowingly presenting as true? Or the reverse? Once you present this, then we must support your theory of tecshare trolling You have not. You are repeating highly negative unsubstantiated claims in an attempt to punish tecshare for standing up to you and your scammer pals. What if someone kept making threads claiming: marlboroza is a theif? Marlboroza is a rapist? Marlbroza is a deceiver with clear double standards?? I could create a far more compelling case for 2 of those than you are making for tecshare is a troll. Stfu crying about this if you can't bring any conclusive evidence. Please feel free to refute any point I have made with which you disagree with marlboroza the deceiver . |
