Bitcoin Forum

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

Well Creditcoin is probably my top 1 coin. BAD would come in at a second. Reason is i base my investments on who other has invested. For example creditcoin was invested in by coinbase + y combinator whild BAND was invested in by Dunamu

You are very right, i equally agree that the success of any ieo projects depends solely on the type of exchanges used.

If you consider recent events, hackenai chose wrongly when it selected oceanex, the ieo crawled to perfection and only a round conducted i suppose.

The only coin that had immense success that i can remember outside kucoin, Binance and OKEx is the sero platform that happened on gateio.

Nonetheless, always dyor and ensure to pick your profits

That is true, exchanges plays a vital role in the success of any IEO. I want to point something out and that is, the IEO mustn't be on Okex or Binance, there are other good exchanges to start IEO on such as Kucoin, Gate and so on; at least I have seen projects which had a good success on exchanges other than the ones you pointed out. Also, use case plays its role, as an exchange like Binance try its best to ensure they pick good projects; no good exchange will like to accept a bad or questionable project for IEO.

I agree with you on some point about the crypto-exchange capacity to host the IEO campaign, the two exchange that you mentioned the OKEx and Binance is the top choices for a successful IEO because it's popular, trusted and reliable exchange in terms of users and trading volume globally and I'm sure also that Okex and Binance will not accept any fraudulent project to hold an IEO on their respective platforms.

p2pb2b or VinDax are already bad reputation in the world of IEO, I do not understand why many IEO projects still use these two Exchange. Another Exchange that is often used by the IEO project is Exmarket, this market I think is the same as p2pb2b or VinDax, bad reputation. Yes I agree Okex and Binance are the right market to do IEO.

You are correct, most of the successful ieo on the big exchanges are not better than those who have struggled to raise enough capital for the project, it's all down to how big the exchange is.

This is true, but we cant blame those projects that are going there for listing. Okex and Binance are not small fishes that can be easily caught by those projects fishing rod especially if their quality has low one. The only advantage of those exchange such as Binance is people trusted them enough for investment. Have you ever invested OP on those platform such as vindax? Dont mind or even plan cause as you said you will only loss your fund instead of having profits.

Maybe they have volume but those are not sure if real and natural trading. I bet they are manipulated by the platform.

Reputation of an exchange is also need to be considered before investing on the projects but its not the ultimate sign since many projects from Binance also got rekt in the log term for the investors.

TOP exchange site has a good reputation and it's always putting a very strict verification to get eligible ICO that will be listed on the IEO launchpad that already created by exchange site.
The popularity, credibility, reputation of exchange site will actually give a huge impact to the result of IEO. I do agree with it and exchange site matters a lot to determine how succesful the project to raised the money from the public crowdsale.

I agree with you, indeed the success of IEO is in the Exchange if you want IEO to be successful and the tokens have a long term, then it's better to choose a good and trusted exchange. indeed if we see lately many IOEs have chosen p2pb2b or vindax even though both exchanges have bad reputations.

I think you have to be careful when you want to participate in IEO which is held at the exchange place because many cases end up scamming and making cryptocurrency worse, like the case that is still a hit now is the BCNEX exchange place where at that time it was able to get a hardcap but currently exposed to a case and ends up a scam.

Some project that wants to do IEO did not passed criteria set by these top exchanges, so they have no choice but to pick low rate exchange in the hope that they can attract investors on their project fee is also a factor, but there are exceptions where a project succeeded even if the exchange is not that popular, bounty promotion and project potential is a big help.

Yes if you choose a scam exchange you are doomed to fail no matter how good the project is but even if the project is really good and you chose one of the best exchanges with regards to IEOs the chances of success are not hight and so far NO exchange proved a successful funds raising. I would love to see one case study with evidence proving funds were actually raised!

They are trying to use cheap exchange.
I mean those who offer just a little payment for their coins to be listed.

Yeah, somehow that works. Unlike how it is with ICO's they are being beaten after they are listed. The coins just lose their value there.
Here in IEO, it is a competition of who can list their coins initially with a better exchange.
It is the other way around but as I see, more supporters do come.

Isn't that the main reason why IEO exist in the first place? The projects that are being hosted are being carried by the exchange and  IEO is basically an ICO + Advertising package and raising the credibility by sacrificing some portion of funding for the exchange on top of that. Developers who blindly agree being hosted by bad exchanges are basically destroying their own project.

Of course a big exchange plays an important role for a successful ieo and these days this is very unfortunate to see some genuine project owners are choosing worthless exchanges for ieo which is absolutely risky for them and also for investors so it's necessary for project owners to consider on this issue before starting an ieo.

Based on my personal observation, I can say that the success of IEO mostly relies on the reputation of the exchange, when it's in a bad exchange, people will not invest on it as people now are looking on the exchange where the IEO is happening.

It's like the success of altcoins relies on bitcoin... so if bitcoin will rise, people will tend to invest in altcoins as well.
When IEO in bad exchange, people will not invest, but when it's in Binance, people are very aggressive in investing.

we can take the Cartesi as a good example on why Binance makes a project successful.

https://cryptopotato.com/ieos-are-not-dead-binance-latest-cartesi-ctsi-skyrockets-400-during-its-first-hours-of-trading/

What are you talking about ? Looks like you didn't read this topic and gave silly answers. Try to comment on something related to this topic, if this situation persists I think your account will be banned for spam.

It's true but it is also true that exchange like Binance don't launch any IEO offer they get. they evaluate before listing it and also they charge a huge fee. That's why, some IEO goes with poor exchanges which result them no success at all.

those projects should review their project first and consider whether it is deserve to be listed in a top exchange or not rather than giving up and go straight to the shittiest exchange there is. there is reason why binance only have IEO once a month or longer they put quality first rather than quantity.

No. IEO success is not dependent on the exchnage but on project product and marketing skills. We feel Binance IEOs are successful because its on Binance no that's not true. Before being on Binance the project have made enough marketing commitment to get there.

It is clear that IEO is not dead. But not all IEOs succeed in this market. If IEO wants to be successful then they need to be done at leading exchanges in this market such as Binance, OKex. Gate, MXC exchange ... those are hype and reputation. So the IEO projects there will certainly be successful and have a very high profit rate

Every projects that goes on gate.io for IEO became successful, gate .io is no nonsense exchange, there are still few good exchanges out there especially in Asia part of the world, the reason why new projects choose small exchanges is because of fund

Include Latoken as one of those exchanges that does not have any good reputation and as far as I know every project that held their IEO in latoken were unsuccessful. Better hold and IEO in probitctjan those low key exchanges. It really depends on how good or reputable the exchange and Team effort to be able to bring the projects into success.

Top exchanges are too strict with their IEO and most of them succeed within a month so its a good idea to be on the top exchange instead of a shit exchange. I also support IEO’s on Binance because they have the best hype but it will still depend on a project, remember that not all IEO’s succeed in long term and big exchange can’t help them on that.

I totally agree with this, the success of an IEO depends on the exchange chosen but not entirely. In as much as doing IEO of big exchanges like Binance, OKEX, HUOBI, KUCOIN etc will give very high chances of being successful (selling out), people also consider the team behind the project and what they have to offer. Personally i dont participate in IEOs done on petty exchanges with low reputation because most likely they end up not being successful or they lie about the outcome just to lure in people when trading commences after listing.

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

P2pb2b and Vindax are sisters of death, you conduct IEO there, it's as good as you have failed, all projects I followed there never made it from the pipe line, while projects that got listed there after IEO are useless in price. They will some day close down because it's a fake volume and bot paradise.

it's true that the success of IEO lies in the exchange, just look at IEO solana which is in binance. we know that community interest in binance is very strong. and finally solana rises rapidly.

The more the users an exchange has the more an IEO is gonna succeed. But the projects needs to convince the investors first to invest in their project, conducting an IEO on a top exchange does not mean guarantee success but rather more chances of success.

Yes, even if you choose a top notch exchange and you have nothing to offer to the community, I don't think people will gonna invest. I guess by now people are smarter in checking the projects. And sometimes they are looking now for the actual product before spending money to crypto projects because they have had enough already. Relying on great promises is really not a thing anymore. They want tangible plans and products.

I don't think top notch exchange will accept them if they don't have something to offer on their community since if you look on binance they are actually doing a great performance on their IEO and most of the coin added on their launchpad got a higher chances of success rate that's why we are seeing them competitive compare to the other tokens who conduct a IEO on small tier exchange which turn scam immediately. I remember Probit is one of the example where scam IEO goes so we should take extra precaution on this exchange.

oh ok so op here missed something . i agree on you guys a project needs both and not just by looking forward being listed on a good exchange . for sure there are ieo that also listed on binance but they havent  go enough investors because they are lacking of something that majority of people are looking for . also there are also ieo that became succesful on an exchange that are not really that popular.  im not saying these exchange are bad tho

certainly investors have now begun to choose projects that have real products, not only to make promises, so not all projects that hold IEO in large markets get a lot of funds all depending on the products they offer and the profits that will be obtained by investors

If you like to lose money go there on p2pb2b for an IEO. That exchange is one of the worst platform, they dont even have transparency for the project collections they just said the IEO is done and the counter of their sales of the project is too suspicious. IEO is good way of fundraising but some platform only take advantage of the idea and not preserved the welfare of their investors. See how Binance do it well, and the feedback on every IEO is always as expected huge success.

You may think that an exchange listing that IEO gives the project a credibility and that is correct, however being there is already something special and that means the project was good to begin with. Do you really think exchanges are willing to put shitty projects on their websites?

I mean that would only hurt business if the people who fund that gets poorer, you need to make people as much money as you can as an exchange in order for them to continue trading with you, the more money they have the more they will trade and the more they trade the more trading fee you will get. Hence if a project is getting an IEO from a reputable place, that means they were already good even without the IEO as well, they just got the recognition that they are as good as they think.

Binance is just sending out messages to other new projects, bout how serious they should be, binance have no issue listing any project if they are good enough, developers should start working on something better

In future CZ will make crypto more opened to the world and people will easily make safe investment option, starting with coinmarketcap many investors still make crypto investment decisions using Coinmarketcap, and this makes me think that IEO will become more popular soon

You're absolutely true lower exchanges we're hosted all of the garbage projects. And those are picked too much easily because of small figure listing fees but in there major exchanges shit projects can't afford, reputed exchanges never conducted IEO's for lower projects. A lot of difficulties to negotiate for the biggest exchanges. I see massive different in major and lower exchanges categories.                            

I fully agree, investor support greatly influences the success of IEO, however, we know that some projects that hold IEO sales in major exchanges such as their success binance in minutes, even seconds.
we can think simple, they are really serious to run the project and have money to pay a fee that is not cheap.

Exchnage plays a role in IEOs but that's not the determining factor of its success. An IEO can reach her soft and hardcap on exchnage but price dumps way below the IEO price how do we classify such? Do we still say it was a success or not. To me project itself plus exchange determines the success of an IEO exercise.

In any case, it will all depend on the Binance team.  The fact is that if the independence of Coinmarketcap did not bring reliable information, then you have to rely on the honesty of the Binance team.  I believe that the information that shows CMC will be radically different from what we are used to seeing so far.

So now the success rate of a project is evaluated where does the IEO project come from?
So can even a garbage project be a good project if you do an IEO in a big market?
I don't think that's the case.because a large market will find a good project for listing on the market and not just choose.

yes you are right, projects that do IEO in the market such as p2pb2b, vindax, latoken and other small exchanges with high fake volume I don't believe it.
what I observed was that the project that carried out an IEO on the exchange turned into trash tokens, though not all of them

as much as possible not to be affected by the place of exchange because of the place of exchange as you mentioned there have been many cases that have happened and made the name of the place of exchange worse, they are trying to improve but I don't think it can happen easily.

This is just the truth plainly without any form of corner cutting,
Any ieo is bound to succeed based on the level of exchange it is happening, so kindly dyor and don't invest at risk,

These exchanges are often not recommended because IEO here only makes you feel more tired and the risk will be higher than the better projects. In this market, exchanges with good liquidity will be more trusted and only Huobi, Okex or Binance can meet this in the crypto market. Of course IEO here always helps you to earn high profits and has never disappointed investors.

That doesn't make sense for a big exchange site will choose a crap project to be launched on its launch pad platform. The big exchange site is also doing a deep research too and they will ask the MVP that created by the project first whether it meets the requirement or not.

Crap project will never be taken by the major exchange site.

Your thinking is too far bro, indeed what you say can happen within a period of time that we cannot determine, and like that IEO has begun to be liked by many people including investors, and until now I have not seen that CZ will make crypto more open to the world and people will easily make safe investment options.

Binance Launchpad is the best of all IEO exchange, normally an IEO launches on big platform have return of investment. Why would you waste your time and money on joining on some exchanges that not have a good record on IEO? Many exchanges follow Binance but not all gain a succesful on launching some new projects.

Eversince IEO was introduced it becomes a ground for succesful in adding funds on the marketcap and hopefully it continue but only those big exchange all those medium one should stop cause they not help but increase the scam reports.

I won't call it rekt because those projects still manages to stay at ICO price on binance, not many exchanges can do this today, if Bitcoin start surging listed coins on binance will be the first to start following as well

you are right, but you forget to add the others exchanges like probit, exmarkets which are doing a tons of IEO . At the end, all the projects become the most shity coins for choosing those exchanges. Someone might be a regular traders in probit/exmarkets . So i only want to say that probit/exmarkets is not bad for trading the top crypto-currencies, but it's the worst one when it's about the new altcoins trading. Whenever any IEOs finished and listed in their exchanges , the coin/token price of that project's dump almost 95% times. So every new projects should think more about doing IEOs in these exchanges.

The level of success of IEO depends on the reputation of the exchange that organizes it, I think thats true. Binance Launchpad has so far been very attractive to investors. There is a lot of IEO success there with a good ROI. But I dont think that the future of the project can be determined by their success during IEO.

IEO held on reputable exchanges will facilitate investors to get good and safe investment. I think IEO has defeated ICO and if IEO can be used as an alternative to investing then choose IEO which is done on a reputable exchange because I think this is the best choice for investing.

It is true, the gap of success of IEO on top exchanges is wide when compared to other exchanges. An exchange like P2PB2B and Latoken are well-known for not having good IEO success and most times I wonder what project team expects when the list there for IEO; also in cases like this, I see it as the team are not serious with their project. In all ramifications, the type of exchange for IEO is very important hence the team should endeavour to check if there have been successful IEOs on the exchange they want to list on, this will help them make the right decision.

Yeah IEOs wholly depend on the exchange platform, so its reputation, liquidity, active user base all matters so choosing top ieo platforms is important, secondly the team should remember that the good exchange will not only help them raise funds quickly but also give them listing opportunity which is itself huge and boost trust of the investor.

Top exchanges really are a big influence on the project it seems like the majority of the people who use and trade on those top exchanges are starting to get interested in that certain project too just like what is happening on Binance now. If they are having a launchpad (IEO) that project will become the new star, so many people are going to jump and get interested in it. Binance will not let their reputation goes down by not reviewing a project well. I am sure they will run a lot of verifications. Listing and having an IEO on sh*t exchanges now will not bring you, huge investors, Investors are wiser now.

But a little looking for the reputation of exchanges such as Binance which provides the best ROI on tokens that have been launched in IEO, there are so many exchanges with IEO that are currently running there, there are few investors because some still lack confidence so that makes the project less support and no develop again.

I do agree with you, it is waste of time to want to raise funds from some of these small exchanges where most of their volume are fake. Exchanges are just being greedy, ICO concept is not their game they forget that there are many reason that made ICO a huge success and the model was sustained for sometime if not for the SEC that went after the developers. I just believe we still need something like ICO in the space that would bring new money to the space

New initial fund raising platform means a new exchange site. These days people trust only the exchange site which was having very good credibility like binance, okex, and more major coins.
I don't even think if the new platform can easily perform like what already did by the major exchange sites. A bunch of new exchange sites have already launched and they don't know what to do.

I think new exchanges can not do anything , but if they are fast learners maybe the first step is to focus on finding lots of users and increase their trading volume after enough maybe it's time they try their luck with launchpads such as binance, okex etc. but now many new exchanges are too early to launch a launchpad for IEO which is a problem if they do this it will be useless because the launchpad they launch definitely won't work.

No doubt! Actually, i wish some project managers got to know about this. No matter the good use case you may have if you don't get a good exposure in this industry as well as a very liquid exchange the project will not survive. I have seen great projects come to nothing after listing on some low and inactive exchanges.

Warmly agree with you bro. P2PB2B, Vindax, Exmarket, Shortex etc are just low quality shit exchange. Their IEO platform are also a trash. If somehow any project survive to collect some fund from those exchange project won't stand for a year. Other hand big/trust worthy exchange like binance/kucoin give many successful IEO projects from last couple of years. It's all about trust i guess. Investors don't want to invest any not trust able IEO platform. So they choose high quality IEO platform for invest their money.

I never heard that P2BP2B and vindax are good exchange especially to join an IEO event. Because in several news both exchange have tried to scam their user. Maybe you can see some accusation againt them on scam accusation board on this forum. But I will be agree that Binance and OKEx are good exchange to join IEO event, especially binance which have succefully listed good coin such as Matic and Harmony. Both coins have been trading on the exchange and I have tried to use matic coin for sending money and you know what, the transaction went quickly, it will beat ripple in the future.

It is true. Prospective investors will have more confidence in the global top exchange because the exchange must have complex criteria and stringent requirements to collaborate with a project. Global top exchange will not risk its reputation by collaborating with projects that are not promising.
This makes it easy for investors to choose projects, of course.
Global top exchanges like Binance have a strong community, so that it will automatically make a project have a strong market interest. This has an impact on high bids, so it is likely that prices will easily go up and provide profits to investors.

How can you say solely? So the project doesn't matter at all? The platform it launches in should ideally be trust worthy and have a good reputation but saying its solely based on that is just not true. How about a token or coin that can be used? Wouldn't that be nice? Otherwise, it just becomes about how it's being launched on the exchange merely to sell.

I strongly agree that successful IEO projects depend on exchanges. By choosing exchanges that are popular and reliable, of course percentage
the success of IEO projects is quite large. Because good exchanges maintain quality by choosing potential coins to be listed. Then we benefit as
users if we take IEO projects on credible exchanges.

Exchanges are the best way to make those projects successful and if listed in good liquidity exchanges like Binance, that project will surely attract a lot of investors to join. However, besides good exchanges, there are very bad exchanges and can cause you to lose money in a short time. As I know, Latoken, Probit, Vindax are 3 exchanges that you should stay away from because IEO here only makes you lose money.

Many factors how to make some IEO and ICO project because of exchange, if listed on shit exchange look little possibility to be success because many investor always checking where exchange become their partner for IEO and ICO listed, with good exchange have guarantee for some ICO and IEO project to be success with higher price.

If we intend to invest in IEO, it's better to choose IEO organized by large exchangers. Aside from being historically able to make a profit, IEO in large exchangers in my opinion is safer because there is a fairly strict screening process

indeed, exchange is very influential on the success or at least the future of the token market. because market liquidity is very influential also on the development of token liquidity and token volume. so, I also agree that exchange also has a big influence on the success of tokens.

Top exchanges like Binance or Okex choose IEO projects very carefully so only good and real projects can do IEO on them. Once IEO is confirm on Binance, successful is confirmed because Binance has big community who are positive to IEO, all IEO held on Binance were sold out.

Sure, they have a rigorous process for selecting projects. And the projects chosen are the best projects in this market, and if we participate successfully then we will surely get a lot of profit from it. A few days ago, participants of IEO Cartesi received 5 times more profit than the original price

You are right IEo totally depends on the exchange as this is also a fact that good project always good exchange like Okex, Binance as the project owner wants to invest in real project but the IEO which are conducted or plan to conduct by some projects on low rating exchanges like Latoken, Vindax, Exmarket etc 99% project go to scam as no investor wnt to lose his precious money.

Some shit exchange is pushing new projects to become scam project by IEO. After success any IEO, shit exchange is giving false news to the legit project. Top IEO token pump in gate.io exchange which was SERO. Top exchange has high demand which can't afford average project then this project go for low volume exchange. I think the best example will be Thorcoin but p2pb2b or vindax still hasn't any good project.

There's an atom of truth in what you just said, which shouldn't be so since that'll only attract short term Investors looking for quick profit and would easily dump your project when such opportunities present itself without having second thoughts. IEO should have made crowdfunding more secure in the sense that the trusted exchange would be in charge of overseeing the sale and reduces the chances of getting scammed and that's just it.

But all that have been ignore as the exchange are just concerned about their profit instead of putting the interest of their customers first. Those project that go rushing after this big exchanges find it hard to continue recieving the hype they did recieve at first because just as they had their turns to recieve all the attention, other projects will also have theirs by taking the attention away from them.

What you have said is a simple truth. New projects that still want to remain in this space and valid should choose a top exchange to conduct their ieo. Otherwise that will be the beginning of their failure.

It's one of the factor but it's not the only one that can make the investors invest on the project, but it's factor other  factor are project potential who are the people behind the project and what it will contribute to the community, if I don't see some of these I prefer not to participate in their IEO, in the end it's always the contribution of the project to the community.

Large exchanges have a large community and reputation too, so making IEO done there can be easily successful, if only exchanging with fake volume will make the project die, like the exchange you said

There will be no good project but choose shitexchanges like P2PB2B or Vindax or Latoken. Only junk or fraudulent projects choose to go to such exchanges. because they will make enough roadmap in the most economical way and then take all the remaining investment and exit. done!
Only real projects choose the IEO of top exchanges for long-term development. They know that when there is a large community, their ideas will be more likely to become reality.

It could be a big factor also but one thing that could help and become productive as their goal to be is to have a working product. In fact, not all projects that are listed on the top exchanges will be given a chance to walk on the alley and take the lead over the others. Investors are much looking for a project that gives benefits to everyone because this is a reason to increase their market demand. It was the team engagement that could make the project fully succeed not the exchanges itself.

Yes,you are very much right about this. The goal of ico and ieo might be same but the process make it very much different form other. In icos people's check many things like team, partnership,any big names in team, MVP and many more things. But now in ieo culture if binance announce a ieo we all know it gonna be reached hardcap in minutes. But if a project come with great setup but ieo in a small exchanges theni ts not gonna win. But it's also true most of big ieos atleast not in scamming side. But most of the small or bad project have that problem.

sorry to break the bubble but your statement is so wrong, investor don't care about its benefit although some investor might care about that but majority are not really fond of that, what they care is just money. as you can see there are many trashy project around but as long as the project having good back up popular advisor or good exchange they would succeed, that's why exchange is also a big factor.

Correct. indeed we need to be vigilant before participating in IEO held in exchanges that have a bad reputation. I think there needs to be an authority to prevent the exchange of scams that continue to roam in the crypto world so that others can avoid loss.

For me personally, I only invest in top tier coins. For example my recent investment - Creditcoin, ,the reason i invested into it is because of the press release and the news about how coinbase invested into the project.

You are absolutely right. No matter how bright your roadmap and whitepaper looks, listing our IEO on shitty exchanges say Vindax, P2PB2B, Probit exchanges etc will mark the beginning of your downfall. This is because over time, no IEO listed in these exchanges perform well. So the importance of good exchanges in projects cannot be overemphasized.

Ofcourse, what good is a project without an exchange? Not just any but a good one, This is why project needs to make exchange listing top priority, listing on the right exchange will certainly help the project during the ieo process, but unfortunately some project don't see it that way, rather, they will choose the cheapest of all neglecting the damage it might cause to the growth of the project, I think most serious project always put this into account which is very necessary.

Every project wants to hold their IEO in top exchange but the fees and the criteria are just too much or they are not qualified so their only chances are those exchanges where they have a good chance to qualified and offered a much-lowered fee, but holding your IEO on top exchanges like Binance and Kucoin can really help their cause.

Agreed with you, this keep me wondering when things had  changed so drastically since the arrival of this IEO. We have seen many projects huge source of funds within their project environment and these types always distinguishe themselves from the fake funds or compelling exchange participants to buy into unwanted projects just to hold their tokens. Big exchanges that conducted ieo have been seen successful due to their large users on their platforms. The more buggerj the exchanges the more funds they're likely to raise.

Creditcoin didn't do an IEO and it was still successful because it was backed by Coinbase and Y combinator. The exchange is important but so are the investors behind the project.

Are you kidding me? Creditcoin is the leading currency in this market? For me this is one of the shitcoin in this market. For years, this altcoin still could not function like their roadmap and did not have any updates, and it looks like it's going to die this year

from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail

There is no need to doubt about IEO in Binance because most of it is always successful, even many investors who fight to get a lottery will be able to participate in IEO in Binance, meaning that large exchanges always provide benefits for their investors.

But you see the KingCasino project did an IEO in the first round at a price of $ 0.5 and sold 25,000,000 KCT equivalent to more than $ 10M and was done at the p2pb2b and Latoken exchanges.

https://twitter.com/kingcasino888/status/1249986637804613632

I believe that Exchange is one part of the reason why a certain IEO is successful. On the given scenario that Harmony and Cartesi got a successful IEO is somehow because of the exchange, Binance is one of the most famous and reputated exchanges today and no wonder that they have a bunch of users than any other exchange which means more promotion to the IEO project. There are some successful IEO happened inside Binance and project devs would probably choose to initiate their IEO there to gain more trust in the investors.

Binance is different from another exchanges. As far as top exchange all of IEO's definitely will made big influence, you know how much excited all of people before binance new launched. Will never delist in the new projects, which aren’t make good trade volume than those can be delist, but they’re delisted so many tokens in every year.             

You are right but other thinking, do you know bitcoin more difference from another exchange, almost i am very excited when a project coming with IEO binance launched. They are have few projects manage IEO in popular exchange as lot of project want small exchange for promoting IEO.

You are right,after scammers contributed to spoil the reign of initial exchange Offering, the reign of initial exchange Offering took off ,the exchange where the initial exchange Offering is carried is very important,that alone does not contribute to the growth and success of the project,the use case is very important and also the marketing strategy of the team ,all joined together gives a successful project.

Binance is really way ahead of its competitor in term of marketing and hyping up about the project they have. Other exchanges are just outright shoving the project to people's throat meanwhile binance only do IEO once a month and they are selecting it carefully. as much as I hate this kind of centralized exchange they have done a good job in this field

IEO is only good on reputable exchanges. But from what i've seen most legitamate projects with REAL instituional investors simply skip the IEO / ICO public sales and basically collect money easily from private sales and then list directly onto exchanges.

For example Creditcoin , invested in by coinbase, y combinator, youtube, etc, just listed directly onto bittrex and OKEX and the price has already gone up 30x

Some projects today IEO/ICO have their own exchanger and obviously, they are not having the interest to enlist their project into other exchanges.
Not the thing that they won't make a good marketing strategy but we know investors are usually focusing on the known exchanger which leads the others to be ignored. Then, this is a thing that could bring those projects has a lesser chance to succeed than those who are listed to the big names exchanges. That is how it affects the future of a particular IEO/ICO and that will lies (mostly) in the hands of the exchanger.

Nope, not true at all. Again, look at creditcoin, did NOT do a IEO and instead just did a direct listing and the price still pumped. the important thing is the fundamentals of the coin, not whether or not a coin does an IEO

To say the truth not all new projects will afford using binance and other top exchanges for IEO, what about them? No enough fund no going top exchange? I hope in near future binance makes things little bit easier for new projects

|Nope, not all coins need to do IEO on binance to be successful. Look at Creditcoin one of the most hyped projects of 2020, they launched initially on bittrex and okex and they are already up 4000% this year...

the differences between the top exchanges and this low IEO rated exchanges is not the dump of coin raise or listed but the research and demand placed on the project that list with them. Such projects listed have very active community, good roadmap, relevant and reliable partners and the team have track record in the space. Some of these exchanges may not list projects with competitive project idea which does not mean they are bad projects. The scam trend taught me to look more into team before the project idea or product.

Anyone who have been in the crypto space since the inception of IEOs by now will understand or rather agree with you that, indeed the type of exchange has a hand in the success of any IEO. An exchange like P2PB2B hardly records any successful IEO, if at all there have been one, also an exchange like Latoken, Vindax and their likes are in the same category with P2PB2B, any IEO listed there have the team to blame. On the other hand, exchanges like Binance, OKEx, Kucoin etc have recorded a good number of success in IEOs with Binance and OKEx taking the lead, so it is not rocket science that they have what others don't which is, reputation earned by hardwork.

I think this is related to investor confidence in the exchanger who organizes IEO. Large exchangers certainly do not depend on fees or fees because they are related to reputation and this is different from exchangers whose reputation is not good because they only pay attention to fees from listing fees

OMG, it looks like you must need to read what thing that already discussed again. We are discussing about the success of IEO was caused by the exchange sites. If creditcoin was not doing IEO and it can't be mentioned here dude.

He is answering the wrong topic, and I see it seems that he is trying to FOMO this altcoin. I have seen credit since 2017 and it seems like this is an old project, this project hasn't been developed in a long time and it's not as good as it used to be.

Exactly what is truth,because most of scam projects are having their own exchange in which there are only
 fake volumes to look like legit but in the end after the
 project was lunch and the investors money are in their hands?
they will run and vanished right away and the victims like Bounty Hunters and also the investors will wait
until forever for nothing.that is why to have a great
view in every project that will be coming make sure that
the exchange are legit and functional.

The best exchange is crypto market. As the name implies, IEO Initial Exchange Offering is the performed on the cryptocurrency exchange platform instead of the issuer’s platform. Though both IEOs and ICOs are techniques of crowdfunding, token issuers are responsible for ICOs while IEO is managed by an exchange platform on behalf of the startup looking to raise funds in crypto market. I will take some crypto assets to the smart contracts in exchange for tokens.

the only factor of successfull ieo is name of exchange. if it is binance than it will be x4-5 in the start of trading. if it is noname exchange than probably you will not get profit.

not his name. but it would be more appropriate for the number of trades and communities that trade in an exchange. when the exchange has a large trader, of course, it will help the IEO process carried out at the exchange. when the exchange has only a few traders, of course, it will not attract traders and other potential investors. certainly will fail if the development team does not have a good strategy.

Exchange with high liquidity like Binance, it is normal to earn high profits and of course if you are lucky to participate, you will feel very love life. In the past I have participated in a total of 7 different IEO projects but only exchanging Binance helped me to make the most profit. In addition, you can also consider some exchanges such as Okex, Huobi because these are also very good exchanges for investors.

Highly liquid exchange does not guarantee profit if you invest on their IEO, and not all IEO in Binance were really successful and some just rise because of the hype, nothing has really showed it's stable success yet, so we can't conclude that.

Those exchanges you've mentioned are good exchange as well, they'll compete with Binance but problem with this big exchanges is they charge big money,  and that's the reason why other projects which does not raise a good amount will struggle in the market, especially if they have an IEO in a smaller exchange.

The IEO projects above the two exchanges are not remarkable, I think that there is no really good project that chooses IEO on the bad exchanges. If the project is good they can successfully ICO, without having to pay for IEO on bad exchanges.

Some people claim that this is the time for IEO, especially if we see some projects having difficulty listing in certain exchanges for several months. IEO help it, and provide "guarantees" if the IEO in Binance or Okex.

You are absolutely telling the truth. But sadly many potential projects don't have this idea! They have everything good but in the end, they choose P2PB2B, Latoken or Vindax! I was looking for a better campaign, recently Yougene (Maybe Spelling not correct) campaign attracted me. But when I saw they chosen Latoken for IEO, I moved on! So, I think the same that IEO success depends on the top exchange, not in projects!

usually the projects they offer are not very attractive indeed when the exchange has a platform that has a good reputation it will make a lot of people will be interested in the various offers that they provide. but it must be careful with the exchange that provides information about offers because there are some scam exchanges.

This is one of the reasons why an exchange has large contribution on the performance of IEO.
Though the reputation and status of the exchange has great influence on the IEO results, still it depends on how the project is marketed and built.
If the investors will see that the foundation of the project is not so good, I don't think they will easily buy their coin.
They also need an assurance that the project will have the capability to deliver their objectives.
And that is by checking the background, the technology, team, whitepaper, roadmap, or even their initial assets.

The hype will attract many investors and like we had the ICO craze people are behind the IEO craze, one folded because majority of the projects that started collected millions and never fulfilled anything to reward the investors and people should really learn the lesson and even with so many scams people are investing in projects with trusted developers and the IEO craze will not survive for a long time either.

You are absolutely right. YouGene is a great project, and their choice of Latoken is an evidence of strong Latoken presence in the market. It’s not a fortuity but this exchange has a lot to offer for projects, primarily, an excellent infrastructure.

So your subjective view is just your subjective view. Fortunately, I fully support Yougene both in this choice and as the project in general and waiting for their remarkable development.

And to place IEO on Okex and Binance exchanges is also not easy, they will not immediately accept useless projects listed in their list, so from that the project prefers a bad exchange such as P2PB2B or vindax for IEO even though the project knows that is a bad exchange.

Well, under the current conditions, IEO, which is in good exchange, will get additional responses from investors like binance huobi bithumb, and the project will definitely be crowded too.
Since large exchanges are not listed carelessly for every project, they are selected first.

Yes, that's right, but a good exchange also doesn't arbitrarily accept IEO from unclear projects, because they also don't want the list of coins in their exchange to be filled with junk coins from projects with unclear origins.

well, even though they have implemented such a method, but there are still a number of projects that have passed and they have very low prices, until now there is no direct support from the developer so that the price movement cannot go up and cannot provide many investors.

The statement is right. It doesn't matter of project anymore it's about the exchange now. But there is another a exchange like binance mostly choose project with great team,and vision. People trust binance or any big exchange cause they have security and when they introduced a project it's hard to be scam. That's why people go for the big exchange ieos. There are exceptions there are many small projects that are also doing good but the success rate is less.

Exchanges play an important role, with their followers every announcement from them draws a lot of attention for any project. Can any project be successful without exchange!? I think the answer is yes, it's hard but it's not impossible! The team will need to do their best, to make more effort, and with good ideas and good decisions, anything is possible! As you said, there are exceptions and we need to know how to recognize them and make some good profit!

None of the centralized exchanges can help a shitty project anymore, especially in this market with low liquidity. The solution would be creating use cases for the token, having a fair token distribution, generously rewarding long-term holders and making sure there is a lot of liquidity on the decentralized exchanges.

the use case must be cared for by the token holder, because when the token is on the exchange it cannot be controlled and they move according to the real use case. large exchanges might help to show in terms of sales management but for the future the token must run on its own, therefore real use takes precedence.

I think we should also give a chance to new exchanges to prove themselve although i know there are complains and negative feedback but still we cannot accept monopoly from top 2 3 exchanges we need competition and for this we need to encourage new exchanges and give them a chance.  These new exchanges should also learn to be responsible and take care of their users in all aspects of business.

Nice point but everything boils down to the fact that OP is right with his statement. IEO success greatly depends on chosen exchange, people feel secure with an exchange having high reputation than a new exchange with low trust ratings. Its true that its becoming a thing of monopoly for instance; most crypto enthusiasts won't want to participate in an IEO if it's not on Binance, which is not supposed to be that way. There are other fair exchanges with proven credibility, and success in IEO too.

Exchanges like p2pb2b, vindax, latoken, are Fake Volume, buying IEO Launchpad Tokens on Exchange like that is a big loss in my opinion

the success of a project either through ICO promotion or sales of IEO and it all depends on the project developer or the location where the token is registered at a large exchange. as we have seen today many IEOs fail because they are listed on shady exchanges, are rarely used by traders and often manipulate the volume of coins. like p2pb2b or probit

indeed all success depends on promotion from various ways such as giving bonuses when top up and something else, or can also provide trading fee discounts even free without fees when trading at the exchange but must be careful when participating in IEO because there are several places exchanges that work with IEO developers to manipulate or scam affected traders.

This is the reason why you should be careful in joining these IEO projects. If you want to invest, better invest on top exchanges like BNB. Though the success depends on the exchange, yet, the marketing and the foundation is entirely up to the project itself. The exchange will just take care of the sale but regarding development, it depends on the team themselves. So you have to look also on their real status of their developments. Without that, I don't think they will ever perform better once they are in trading.

I totally agree with the OP too or maybe to be my cynical 90 percent of the success of any IEO solely rests on the Exchange . The 10 percent is for the project which is either excellently built or poorly built.

Indeed the fact that successful IEO projects depend on their exchanges, usually if we choose trusted exchanges such as binance, kucoin,
okex and huobi. IEO Projects held at exchanges that I have mentioned are very likely to have great success. Then without doubt I will
also invest in IEO projects that are listed on top exchanges and have a good reputation. Now I choose IEO projects  in binance, and until
now quite satisfied with the results.

These exchanges are indeed not recommended, I am surprised, there are still those who are participating in their IEO. We have to do a deeper analysis, not easily provoked by the tagline: tokens or coins are already listed on the exchange. We have to really check whether the trade is feasible or it's just manipulation to attract attention.
Just as fraudsters used ICO when it was popular, now they also use IEO to cheat. That is why IEO which is carried out in trusted global exchanges like Binance will get the most attention.

This market situation is better than before but though low volume exchange IEO has no demand after long time. Select from top exchange IEO to protect your money. After IEO of low volume exchange token price dump top level where you know altcoins has no future for long term. In latoken history hasn't any good IEO, you shouldn't investment in Latoken.

I agree that the sale of tokens also depends on the partnership made by the team. But the success of the sale of tokens through the IEO method is influenced by the exchanger where the tokens are sold, because early investors in my opinion want to speculate and make a quick profit. If the IEO organizer exchanger is a large exchanger, the sale of tokens is usually successful only in a short time.

yeah, the exchange that you mentioned is indeed not an exchange that is recommended by many people. we better choose a large exchange like binance. it is more guaranteed than other exchanges, indeed there is no guarantee of 100% success.

you and i know that the crypto world is very risky. all still have risks but at least we can feel a little safer because we are on a trusted exchange.

I believe that a successful IEO has to do with a good partnership exchange and a transparency outcome of product of the project. This matters could bring a good value to their token in the market with a several investors joins with them.

it caused by those exchange sites are scam exchange sites, bad CS, fake volume, Pump and dump by bots and many more.
Those exchange sites have already labelled as the worst exchange site and to participate on IEO that will be launched on one of those exchange sites will be a disaster

I agree with you, a good project will do IEO on the best exchange too, don't expect to get satisfactory results if IEO is done by exchanges that are notoriously bad in the community.

some of the exchanges mentioned also sometimes have IEO but the price is always down, and there is no progress. so far, there are only a few popular exchanges that are very good in the quality of projects that do IEO there, such as binance, kucoin, Okex, huobi, and others. The exchange can encourage a project to be bigger. I have seen enough successful projects from the exchange.

The succesful of IEO is depend on exchange and it is a fact. Top exchanges like binance, kucoin etc is have a great chance to success. If you try on unpopular exchange dont hope you will get profit. So anyone want try invest on cryptocurrency you should join top exchange that i already mention.

There's always someone that will get trapped into such scam, you know there are 7 billions people out there and some of them might be stupid enough to not make an indepth study regarding the project that they are going to invest, that's really unfortunate though but if we keep informing them to stay away from such shady scam that'll make a change although a little.

Yes, because IEO is placed on the exchange, so everyone will definitely see the reputation of the exchange where the IEO is held, so it is only natural that the IEO project carried out on a bad exchange no one likes it.

Obviously, now no one is involved in IEO in these exchanges because people know they are scammer in this market. That is why new projects completely fail when implementing IEO there, join IEO in these exchanges, 100% of us will lose money

The exchanger did not have a good volume, apart from that the projects that carried out the IEO seemed normal even after the initial listing, the price fell below the IEO price. This will certainly affect investor confidence in participating in IEO organized by the exchanger

maybe if you make a big exchange, like binance, and others guarantee the token price better.
and it has also been proven that some projects that keep the IEO in binance or quote there must have a good price at the time of the quote.

Exchanges like that literally destroy the reputation of IEO with their bad IEO, there's always reason why popular exchange only choose very few IEO project to get hosted into their platform and not just accepting whoever trying to make IEO whether it's just to scam or money grabbing as long as they got the fee.

In your opinion, how relevant is the ICO in 2020 after many projects turned out to be scammers

Well, you should know that even the Initial exchange offering isn't that trusted anymore since some exchanges decided to be the scammers them selfs. Aside from the Binance offering and some other reputable exchanges, I can't trust any other initial exchange offerings

That's right, a good exchange will have a positive effect on projects that do IEO there, but that is no guarantee of success.

I always say that, that the exchange as you said above is very risky to lose money. Shady exchanges often display invalid coin volumes and many new IEOs are listed there and not many are successful. if you want to invest in IEO then choose IEO which is listed on the big exchanges like Binance, Kucoin or okex.

There have been many projects that failed when launching IEO there and when the listing is also certain the trading volume is very low because the exchange you mentioned has many cases such as accounts that suddenly log in or have fake trading volumes. So it is very likely that the project that is holding IEO there will fail in raising funds.

Do you believe about the KingCasino project that has managed to raise $ 19.5M in sales of IEO in p2pb2b and Latoken while their tokens are expensive in IEO which is $ 0.5.

Even though the exchange was very shady so I am still surprised that there are projects that have succeeded in getting that kind of funds by exchanging lots of negative bait.

That is quite impressive i must say, with all the negativity surrounding this exchanges especially p2pb2b exchange and KingCasino still manage to pull out such a huge amount (if that amount is the actual truth) even with this hard market period is quite an achievement, because of the bad reputation of this exchanges, most project do not want to list or launch their ieo there, investor also would rather not want that exchange,
maybe the exchange is not that bad after all, because 19,5 million dollars is not a joke!

You are absolutely right, the success of an IEO lies in the hands of exchange because if trust, investors invest more where they are certain of good return not a place where they will loose so for such big investment to be for a project exchange should be an answer to such growth. So for an exchange to have a successful IEO an exchange should be lead.

We all know it. Thats why successful sales are only on Binance. Most of them reached hard-cap, even the time for start-ups is not favorable.
But even that, when you are lucky you can still grow your portfolio by investing into IEOs, for example last profitable IEO was JUST (yes, it is connected to Justin Sun) - investors of this IEO earned more than 500% after listing.  8)

IEO started gaining a lot of consideration late last year this is because people believe it might protect the investors from the ICO scam that is very rampant. However, Some exchange platform such as Latoken have abused this believe. They see it as medium to make money to sustain their platform by listing so many useless project on their IEO

I won't blame all new projects who choose to use low rated exchanges to raise fund, sometimes it's always money issue, only projects that have private investors, good partnerships and we'll funded aims for top exchanges because they can afford the IEO fee

For opinion on good ROI as influence of  good and high volume exchange, it is partially correct because because some made this profit, we have seen most of this project dump so dip in long run in this market. However, these projects had better in developments and product than most projects in the 2016/2017 that only pump on speculation without any product. It looks more like the market situation is responsible for the large market dump and bad sentiment. I expect changes after this halving especially from altcoin.

the existence of IEO does not rule out a scam as well and there have been many cases of IEO that do not immediately become a scam because there are several IEO projects that can no longer make a profit withdrawal and there are more cases when participating in IEO the price falls and there is no support from the developer at all.

I agree with you in the aspect of the fact that good exchange determines the success of a project,  but let's not forget that there are some projects that tends to fail regardless of the exchange,  after gotten pumped on listing day,  they are being dumped hard, and perhaps that don't reach their previous all time high,  there are some examples of such coin,  but I don't wanna mention their names so that it won't seems as if I'm tarnishing their image

Ico is no longer popular, but if it is supported by influential partners and big sponsors, it will definitely attract investors. Our job is to do the best possible analysis if you want to get an opportunity from ICO. Well, joining IEO on a trusted exchange is indeed more effective, because the trusted exchange certainly applies strict terms and conditions. Moreover, they have a large user, it is certain that many will be interested.

I saw lots of IEO on binance and Poloniex experiencing good ROI there, but I haven't seen IEO launchpad on p2pb2b, vindax and Latoken have ROI, I think waiting for the Binance launchpad is a good idea rather than having to throw your money at p2pb2b and vindax

Thats really hurt. Projects that have good idea or concept tends to go to low exchange, its not that they dont want to go to big markets but the competition is tight and they miss the chance. Big IEOs that conducted on binance, kucoin, those projects have deep pockets cause I know these exchange would do that for free.

Joining IEO on a trusted Exchange is indeed the right choice, but now it is difficult to find projects that really dare to register their projects to the top Exchange, Because it is hindered by strict fees and conditions. If there is then don't hesitate to join their IEO.

Sometimes it is kinda meh.
Even if it is partnered with popular exchanges like Binance or Bittrex, it is still up to the project as its own whether it'd be a success or not.
A shitcoin is still a shitcoin regardless of the exchange that it is about to get listed at.

I would say, my personal experience judging from the platforms I'm at, that's meh MOST of the time.

Bittrex you say? I've watched their IEOs go from meh to actually really bad. So bad they even just delisted IEO tokens after a few months so that no one is reminded of how shit they were. 70% loss on listing day? They don't even bother sending me emails anymore I bet they got so many users screaming murder at them.

Binance and Okex type good exchanges always accept the good project for IEO and everyone knows they have huge fee or commission for IEO conduction on their platform so the real and strong project will go there and all small or scam will select the low-rank exchanges.

A shitcoin even that was backed by the major exchange but the fundamental will ways the fact for the future of project. We can take a lot of new projects that have already death even if that was backed or running on the major platform.
Basically, this project becomes fail due to the lack of experience to develop the product.
Partnership with a good exchange site doesn't mean that will make the project will be very worth to invest.

With high costs, of course, the quality of the projects produced must be good if they only pay big but their products are not running, then the same two large exchanges will not accept such a platform, they are looking for the best and can grow in the future.

Yes, basically everyone is not obliged to blame the new project, because the project developers only offer their ability to run the project, and if we trust them, it means we also have to understand the risks for that.

Are you still involved in IEO processes? As for me, if you work with cryptocurrency, you can only earn money on trading. ;D

I really hope that all projects can afford doing IEO on binance but they can't because it's very costly, and the only way to success in IEO is top exchanges, this is something new projects can't escape, and going for low exchange is just bad idea

They just give those projects the opportunity to enter the market and introduce themselves to their investor community. Undoubtedly, that's an important stage for projects

I am seeing some good projects now also being listed on these exchanges so i think you have gone a bit too far and being judgemental is not the solution, let these new IEO platforms also grow we know binance and okex will not list all projects so market definitely needs alternative platforms and i hope these projects will grow  icely over time and their project screening process will improve, just because an ieo platform hosted a couple projects that ended up as failure do not mean that every project will end up like that they will have good ones too.

Most of the new projects definitely can afford to list at least in mid range exchanges such probit exchange is potential, fee is not much high. Why specifically P2PB2B and Latoken are most favorite for fraudsters it’s my question, i see a small number of reliable projects will choose shit exchanges when can't afford exchange fee.                           

On exchanges, they mostly trade through special software called trading bots. Have you heard anything about it?

in LaToken or P2pb2b currently trying to get better, there have been several tokens that have been deleted in that exchange, DLSD one of the garbage tokens is also no longer in LaToken, I hope Latoken can fix it and be a good exchange

It is that. A coin that has no value can't be successful as such that has value done in same exchange for IEO. Even if the owner can raise fund to list in a known exchange, after a while, its trading volume will drop because the purpose is not fulfilling to investors.

In my opinion adding exchange slowly or fastly it doesn't matter if a project have regularly development activity. Never forget a good project investors never decrease so it's quite nice thinking if a project want good future then need focus developed program everyday.

Guys, what do you think about this resource? https://tradingbot.info/
I think it is a very useful resource, it contains a lot of information about trading bots.

You are right, the success of a project is also determined by the exchange where the initial exchange Offering is being carried out, top exchanges help push up the project but then,the project should have a good use case.once the use case is good and listed for IEO in reputable exchange,the it's a win win.

I dont see LaToken or P2pb2b planning to get better because despite all the accusations said about the two exchanges none of the two say something about it or clarify the situation which mean they are only doing there IEO activities to profit their pockets. As mdzahed134 said probit is still a fair exchange site.

This is exactly the reason there are less scam attempts from IEO from major exchanges because to get them listed the amount of fees and commission are really high but that does not mean that all the IEO projects that are listed in these major exchanges will not fail. Even now we are seeing failed projects and investors dumping the coins when they reach the profit.

both of these markets often choose projects that I think are mostly unsuccessful, and most projects registered with IEO there do not get maximum funding, and I have followed the development of projects that conduct IEO there but they have failed even there are projects that have held IEO several times there , but the results are the same

Yeah you can say that. The full form of ieo is initial exchange offering. So exchange has the most important role here. But in last few months people understand that ieos are very profitable and the if they are with a good exchange then profit margin are more bigger. And mostly people trusted those projects which are go with binance or kucoin. Cause exchange like probit Or latoken offer those projects which are not so good. But sometimes we see some difference.

because the success or failure of the IEO of the project is seen where the project runs IEO. and the name of the place of exchange that has a good reputation is the main factor chosen by investors today

Yes you are right. At this moment the success of iros are nothing but success of the exchange platforms. Mostly good ieos go for the big exchanges like binance kucoin okex Or bitmax. Cause they have money to offer. And this type of projects are good and do well marketing. So they give good amount of profit. But there you will see some exceptional projects also. The the number of that kind of projects are very less at this moment.

yes it can be said that the success of the IEO project depends on the performance of the project team itself and is listed in large exchanges especially Binance and KUCOIN. if the IEO project can be listed on the top exchange of course, chances are the project will succeed. but it seems like the current IEO project is often listed in shady exchanges like p2pb2b or PROBIT.

ICO is currently not as interesting as ICO in 2017 where investors or prize hunters benefit greatly from the ICO project at that time. but instead ICO currently has poor trust and most ICO is fraud. The emergence of IEO has attracted the attention of large investors but not with IEO on small exchanges such as Vindax, probit, p2pb2b, etc. For me IEO in the top exchanges like Binance, Okex, Kucoin, has a great opportunity for the success of a project.

Now no one risks investing in ICO because projects like this will often put investors at great risk. I think this year is the year for good IEO projects in this market. If you are lucky enough to be able to participate in IEO projects at big exchanges like Binance or Okex, you will surely earn a lot of money. I have been involved in many different IEO projects, and until now there has been no project that disappointed me.

it is no secret that people judge a project initially from where they do IEO. if it's popular exchange, I think a lot of people will be interested and start reading the concepts of the project. however, for less popular exchanges, even those with a red mark for IEO, I don't think sales will be optimal.

Most success is exchange listing of IEO coin because they have good planning and get income for listing coin but most profitable is the owner of IEO coin, right now many exchange market listed of IEO coin but after listing always failed with lower price without care how much investor lost and not profitable for investors.

Now investors are only interested in profits from IEO projects because very few people actually choose to invest in these coins because the risk is very high. Any exchange that implements IEO is only concerned with money, which is why it is difficult for those projects to keep a good price for a long time. Anyway, I am like other investors because everything we are doing in this market is for profit only.

In IEO the investors consider about the credibility of exchange site caused by it will determine how big the liquidity that can be achieved by the token after it was getting traded on the exchange site. That's the same like what you have been saying above me when the exchange site can drowned the credibility of the project.

In IEO, the credibility of IEO is very important because looking at the credibility and trust in the exchange builds the trust of investors to put their money in IEO investment. we know now that confidence in IEO is actually experiencing a huge decline. even people have doubts about IEO

True! The trust of participants in ICO and IEO projects has been reduced dramatically since there were too many scammed one. For me, the successful of an ICO or IEO project is gaining people trust. However, that's the successful on the project side. The successful for both sides (the project side and participants side) is that the project achieves its goals and brings profits to both sides. Got listed on Exchanges is just the first step of being successful!

I too agree once investors interest goes towards IEO's these new exchanges utilizing opportunity as you said these exchange listed IEO's most of are failures no matter how strong is the concept is . But raising fund for really innovative project from small team who cant afford to pay for big exchanges so only they are choosing these small exchanges one more exchange you forgot to mention Latoken.

Some exchanges in crypto world has bad reputations and not good for raising fund like latoken, p2pb2b, dobi exchange etc, new project teams must be ready to do research on past projects that ran through these exchanges, they have bad results IMO

IEO gives investors exactly what they want, quick profits is what makes IEO from top exchanges make lot of sense, no wonder why they always sold out real fast, I still can't understand why new developers don't want top exchanges for their projects, that should be their aims

In 2019 I tried to participate in Binance's IEO, but to be honest, it's too hard to be the lucky winner. I held BNB to accept lottery tickets, but during that time the price of BNB kept going down and it made me lose trying to join their IEO.

Maybe those who issued a new project also did not make P2pb2b and Vindax as the main choice, but the problem is cost. IEO listings also require a fee.
But complaints about costs are rarely mentioned by project owners to participants. Because this concerns the reputation and success of the project.

right, i equally agree if a project manager iEO in popular exchange then they can getting successful sales pried. Very popular scam reason for follow IEO in P2pb2b, latoken, Vindex exchange. Unfortunately we're clear this is fake volume exchange and IEO results also be fake.

    We can't deny importance of the exchange where IEO is held. Better exchanges have more users, better marketing,
followers on every social network, it's hard to miss their announcements.
    All exchanges you mentioned Alexmagn84 have a bad reputation and many accusations against them, for many
reasons. While Binance and KuCoin have more positive reviews.

Well, fair enough I get your point 'IEOs nowadays are better and more preferred over the traditional ICOs'.

What I'd like to add to this for the sake of clarity is that IEOs eliminate the complex issue of the project team dealing with the token shares to investors. The great thing about IEOs is that this huge responsibility is transferred smoothly to the exchange that is in partnership with the project/team.

On top of this, given that exchanges have already invested considerably in 'hack-proof' systems means one less worry since exchanges can use their in house developed infrastructure to deal with issues regarding hackings and token distribution. So in a nutshell, IEOs are the future of capital raising with the help of the investors over the commonly known ICOs  ;)

I don't know why the YOUengine project is supported by this low volume exchange. But I still believe this project will be successful. I have a good experience just focusing on partnership and project plans. You know these 20 percent projects should have a good partnership and plan. You didn't follow your rules, YOUengine IEO list is Latoken and p2pb2b exchange. These exchanges are popular for fake volume.

They have no choices but this is not the main problem. When these projects are seriously developing the product and they can still get a better exchange site than p2p or vindax. We have so many alternative exchange sites when the team can afford the major exchange site. We have chained, bithumb and many more

People are losing hope in ICO.. I my self prefers to join in IEO which much safer and theres a big assurance that the coin will be listed after an IEO. Unlike in ICO when the quota is not reach theres a big chance for ICO to runaway your invested ETH or BTC.

People like before no longer trust ICO, and certainly you will not be able to make a profit from this form of investment. In the last two years, IEO has been more dominant, and this type of investment has always attracted a lot of investors. Of course, you only choose to join IEO at the major exchanges that are encouraged by people because it is usually safe and good liquidity for everyone involved.

Depending on the exchange I would say, not all exchange can bring success to the ieo only top exchanges can bring success to the ieo, and again it depend on how hard the team were able to market the project to bring some momentum around it, if there is enough hype around a project and a top exchange, there is a chance the ieo will be a success.

I have invested in solana ICO and i have made 2.5x return for my investment from solana ico and is that what you have been called  ico is still non profitable?
The guarantee that comes from the exchange site gives more popularity and it's all caused by instant listing to the exchange site.

To some extent I agreed while to some extent I disagree. About the facts I agreed with, ICO's trust has been tarnished and there is no one who is willing and ready to take chances with any of them. Another I agreed with is that, the success rate of IEO varies or rather Increases with the type of exchange, but however I do not agree it must be on top exchanges like Binance and OKEx. We have other exchanges which have been giving good IEO records such as Gate and Kucoin, even Probit is trying its best. Therefore in my own opinion, let the project start by having good use case then go for good exchanges which has recorded enough successful IEOs.

large exchanges have a very strong community and many traders with large capital are there so that the huge influence of the IEO conducted there will be successful, in contrast to small exchanges that do IEO, most of which are only fake

and also large exchanges looking for good projects and not just accepting projects that are listing in the market.
that's why large projects and exchanges always develop because they do the right thing.

R eputation of an exchange is also need to be considered before investing on the projects but its not the ultimate sign since many projects from Binance also got rekt in the log term for the investors

IEO makes your investments much safer. Because the exchange will be the middleman and make sure those projects will be listed at the exchange. 99% of people have moved to IEO and are no longer interested in ICOs at the moment

Larger exchange never accept fake project and i like to impress there Listing fees. You're right a larger exchange has strong communitys with lots of investorscap. Even there influence capital well so i suggest everyone'' keep avoid free Listing exchange IEOs because they're also fake and scammers.

True the key to success of an IEO is exchange, but exchange is number 2, the first is the project itself. There have been many projects that hold IEO in large exchanges but did not get satisfactory results because the project itself is not good enough.

currently, people judge an IEO from the market he will sell. however, people will be more interested in markets such as binance or credit. however, for markets like latoken, p2pb2b, etc., I think people's interest will decrease. Well, this is not a determinant of the success of IEO, but most people will judge it from the market first.

On such cryptocurrency exchanges like p2pb2b, vindax, the cryptocurrency companies that conduct IEO will always fail, because these are scam exchanges where only bots trade and investors don’t want to trade there at all, that is why all the cryptocurrency companies that conduct IEO there remain at the end with nothing.

The large community backed the big exchange site and the whales are also trading on there too.

More people in community and more chance for the IEO to be a successful crowdsale. That increase the possibility for the projects to get the pump too.

I don't know whether it's fake or not. in some new IEO exchanges, I saw them say that the IEO was successful and even reached the price 30X when selling IEO. I have not done much research, but in the exchange for the second IEO was also a huge success. whether fake or not you can do research on the Bitrebe exchange,

A lot of IEO at those exchanges have failed, and until now I've never seen any profitable projects there. I think high liquidity exchanges are usually recommended, and you will be safe to invest there. In the past, I also made mistakes in investing in IEO, but now I have realized many problems and only choose to participate when many people appreciate the project.

But in any case, the success depends on the exchange where the IEO is held. And if I see that a new IEO is being prepared at Binance, I don't do a deep review of the project, because I know that the exchange team will do it better than me. On other exchanges, I do not participate in IEO, because I do not have the same confidence in them as I have in Binance.

Agree with you, they have a lot of money to be able to pump those projects. Whenever these projects are listed, the price will certainly be pump from 3 to 10 times and it makes investors excited. Exchanges will determine the success or failure of projects, so if they can reach an agreement with the leading exchanges in this market then the project will surely raise funds successfully.

80% Maybe if we present that the Exchange is now a determinant of a successful project in funding or during the open market because now more investors are analyzing the exchange first than looking at the concept of a project. the result of too many scam projects makes people cautious

I marked the exchange of p2pb2b and VinDax to the black list because they gave a lot of bad things,sorry I ever took part in an IEO project even though it was only a bounty participant

There have been many accusations against the exchange of p2pb2b and I think if we already know about them it is shady then we need to avoid making transactions but on average the project now uses the p2pb2b exchange as a jump in their project.

Strangely p2pb2b exchange is always a lot of IEO projects even though it has been talked about by many people about its ugliness and what makes them interested so they can put their project into the p2pb2b exchange

Let not forget that, a big cryptocurrency exchange have a bigger role to play when we talk about the success of IEO, though many project that execute their IEO on good cryptocurrency exchange made success out of their project. Although, not all the exchanges have this success  when we talk about project doing IEO on their platform, only some few big cryptocurrency exchange can be proof of this testimony and not just random cryptocurrency exchange without reputation and credibility.

Only fools want to join IEO vindax or other exchanges besides binance or okex.
Wasting money by lying investments, I don't think IEO is as popular as it used to be when many people were attracted by 200% of profits even greater than that.

I don`t why this situation happens, because exchange like p2pb2b, latoken and others have big trading volumes and a lot of users, but IEOs on these exchanges still can`t compete with Binance launchpad. I think reason is community and admins responsibility, because only the best projects can be launched on Binance, but other exchanges accept almost every project which meets the requirements

Another thought is, a popular exchange has strict rules about the IEO that they will promote. besides, the cost is quite expensive. only projects that are ready and already have a good strategy that dares to sell on such exchanges. This makes many investors interested in investing. to be honest I am also more interested in investing in popular exchanges than those that are not so famous.

large trading volume ?, I don't think it is p2pb2b, latoken has a large trading volume but that 80% is fake volume, and therefore every IEO of their exchanges is not in demand and certainly will not be able to compete with the launchpad bination volume which is not like them.

Agreed. The success rate mostly depends on the platform where the IEO will be. For this case, small exchange is getting down many times because of lack participation of investor in IEO. To make a successful project by using IEO method, reputed exchange can help better.

I'm in full agreement to the fact that the success of an IEO lies in the exchange. This is simply because the trust has shifted from the project in the case of ICO, to the exchange in the case of IEO. A large portion of investors in a projects IEO are the normal traders of the exchange.

One of the reasons why people prefer to invest in a project based on the exchange it holds her IEO is because they trust some exchange more than others to filter projects before accepting them to the exchange. I know it takes a lot for a project to hold IEO on global exchanges, as compared to others.

It is obvious that trust in the IEO is formed primarily from the exchange where it is held. And if we see that Binance acts as such an exchange, then we know that all previously conducted IEO brought profit to its participants. For this reason, the number of people willing to participate in IEO exceeds the number of coins sold on IEO.

It is true that most projects that sell tokens (IEO) on both exchanges (p2pb2b & vindax) end in failure. Although there are a number of tokens that are successful in selling, the price will surely fall free, when listed on the exchange. Honestly, I have never participated in IEO in both markets, because I doubt too much about the future development of tokens.

Yes i agree. Good exchange market is a factor for a successful IEO, because it can give a good outcome to investors and as well as for other crypto enthusiast. Also IEO success is based on how the outcome of product runs with their project in the long run development.

I never even took part in the bounty of the IEO implementation projects there. Certainly, those projects will fail to raise funds and prices will drop many times after being listed. So never waste your time and money on these bullshit exchanges

Yes, and everyone clearly agrees on that, because there has been much evidence that the average IEO is successful through a good exchange, because if the IEO fails, then certainly the exchange is less clear, so investors and traders don't dare to use that exchange.

Investors have now become smarter before deciding to invest, and they only choose good liquidity exchanges to join IEO because those exchanges can bring big profits to them. I have never participated in exchanges where many IEO projects have failed because if you choose to invest, the risk will be very high.

Of course, it all depends a lot on how the project develops because if the project development team doesn't have enough money, then it will be very difficult to succeed.

You are absolutely right the Top rank exchange is the success of an IEO. If a good project conduct IEO on low rating exchange its failure chance is more than 80% and on Top rank exchanges like Binance, Okex IEO attract the investors.

That's right, if the project can implement IEO in leading exchanges such as BInance, Okex, Huobi ... then its price will certainly increase many times due to the influence of these exchanges. very big. And for other exchanges, the risk of collapse will be very high

The investors are also seeing from the track record of the launch pad and they focus will be on how much ROI that has already made by the launch pad since it has been launched by the exchange site.

In this case, the project was only getting the hype from the launch pad and exchange site.

That requires high costs, even projects must have a larger reserve fund to be able to launch IEO in large exchanges, but many projects now rely solely on fundraising so it will not be possible if a project that does not have a reserve fund can be launched at a large exchange .

Exchange is only secondary. Having a good idea and the practical implementation of that idea should rank as the first and second most important factors. What is the point in getting listed in a major exchange such as Binance or Huobi, if the idea is not good or if the project is a copycat? Also, if the continued development is not guaranteed, then the exchange rates will go down no matter what.

Yeap you area true, IEO It's not always guaranteed succesfull of an project especially on some that you mentioned before, Of course investors have understood today by choosing a really good launchpad platform such as binance, bittrex and okex compared to p2pb2b and the like which as we know are very fishy. Even so we still need to do more in-depth research because for the long term Top Exchange does not guarantee that a project will continue to be successful and run smoothly (especially for the long term), Cheers.

It's true. Now, the projects only life support on even getting on the market is getting listed on a good exchange. Why so? Because this indicates that the team is serious about their project and want to take the next step. Also, This give them a good starting reputation in the market.

IEO only brings you profit in the first stage, after being listed in the exchange, the price of the token will continuously go down. If long-term investment in IEO projects, most likely we will lose money

Yeah. You are right. Most of the successful ieos are brought by best exchange. Normally people know that ieos are profitable at this moment and those ieos which are listed by big exchanges are usually more profitable than others. And investors are interested in those ieos cause they know when a big exchange support them there is very less chance of getting scammed or something. So if the ieo is backed by a big exchange it will be successful as easy as it sounds.

Investors have learned the hard way that many projects are fraudulent and they may not have enough resources or time to do proper research on projects so they rely on the reputation of renowned exchanges to do just that for them,. Also, big exchanges like binance have the resources and customer base to drive a project towards success

The success of an IEO depend on the level of liquidity and how big an exchange site is but the success of the project itself after the IEO is completely finished depend on the concept and the project team strategy and i believe the perspective which the project will pose after the IEO should be the major reason in a project not the exchange site.
So don't fool about project ROI in the future cause the IEO held by big exchange.

Indeed! The true success can be seen after listing the coin or token and trading at least couple of months. Because the first wave in trading, that's not the real value yet of the coin. In some way, the exchange is a factor but later on, it will be the project itself. Without rock solid foundation and purpose, the project will fall eventually. So it is not only the exchange that you should assess for but also the possible use case in the market.

You are right, the success of IEO as a fundraising method depends solely on the exchange hosting the IEO. Ico sure did had it's  time but the scammy nature of most projects that emerged and abuse the good will of raising funds with ico ruined everything. About p2pb2b and vindax, they are indeed exchanges that every project looking to raise fund should avoid as everything seems to be wrong with them

Based on my observation some of them exchange was the reason why they became successful, as you can see all the IEO on binance and okex was successful while on the vindax p2pb2b was not they have fake volume and their marketing was not good so it turns out to be dumped of token.

Actually I don't suggest to invest in any IEO, without Binance exchange. But one valuable question is of mine, how can be successful a project if we don't invest in IEO. When success story will be minimize, investment should be more available..

You really do, and I totally agree with what you see, winning an IEO also agrees with exchanges other than investors, because basically what I often see is that there are projects that already look good, in terms of their background and sales as well as their promotions and it fell during IEO, due to an error in selecting exhange.

Good liquidity exchanges will often have more successful IEO projects and of course, before choosing to invest, you should research it well. IEO is now becoming a new investment trend during the past year and currently there are many successful and failed IEO projects so please consider carefully. However, what worries me most is that after IEO, those projects have very little news and it makes a lot of investors feel frustrated when choosing long-term investment.

In addition projects are IEO at Binance, Okex are the best new projects in this market. That is why it attracts a lot of attention from investors. IEO is only good for large exchanges, never waste your time on bullshit exchanges like Vindax, Probit ...

Very risky if you make a project has just finished IEO as your long-term investment, Crypto projects must take a long time to succeed, if they don't have news about their latest update, it doesn't mean it's a mistake, maybe they are busy. Believe me, if their IEO on the top Exchange then be patient to see success your project.

Everything depends from how the team works behind the project, if they are moving
according to roadmap, it's a good sign.
Meaning that they are progressive and they really doing their job, even they are not
gaining the support they are continuing.
You need to have a good patience and needs to believe from your long term investment.

agree Okex and Binance are the right markets for IEO, they are a large and rapidly growing market. Reputation also needs to be considered before investing in large projects. and some markets have to filter out some IEO to really be trusted.

Because they have a large community, and as you said that the support that can be given okex and binance is much greater. Investors are an important driver for the start of a new coin, and if we see that some users of okex and binance have large capital which may play an important role as investors in an IEO project. Currently a good IEO project cannot run smoothly without the help of investors or a platform that can provide a path for the IEO.

It is obvious - it comes from the name initial exchange offering, that's why IEOs were created to bring trust into this crazy industry. Exchange with its credibility list a startup and for this takes money. If they list a scam, next time it will be much complicated to raise enough money.

For binance, I think we know how it will impact if a project does an IEO there. of course there will be very many people interested in the project. not only because of the concept of the project, but also because of the popular exchange. so, I also agree that exchange is very important in IEO.

In the past, Binance held very profitable IEO, but what happened to the exchange, now there are no new IEO? Recently, there was only one IEO of the Cartesi campaign, which showed good results. Does this mean that there are currently no good projects that Binance could take to its listing?

ICO Trust is zero percent, now any one can't believe in ICO... ICO investment is totally worthless, for IEO exchange matter and i agre with you, p2pb2b vindax is bad reputation exchange, fake volume exchange...

I think there are many good projects for Binance to be able to organize IEO. But because the current market is not good and it has caused them to change plans. BTW Binance's birthday is coming soon, I believe they will bring surprises for us and will have new IEO in the near future.

Choosing a platform to conduct crowdfunding for an IEO will build confidence for investors. Choosing unknown exchange or exchange with a bad reputation will affect the reputation of a project. Specifically, if you choose an exchange who creates fake volume, or lists scam or bitcoin investors will have a second thought investing.

We hope so, hopefully a new IEO will soon be available at Binance because I see the current market situation is very good for making IEO, a lot of Altcoin starting wake up, maybe soon the Altcoin season is coming. Prepare your funds if you want to be an investor in Binance Exchange.

It's already been said many times already that top exchanges brings good results for IEO projects but presently new projects like COVIR and YouEngine are still interested in exchanges like Exmarket and P2PB2B after all the warnings they decide to ignore me, I will remind them when things go wrong in the end  ;D

I get why top exchanges are very important for any IEO project to be successful but I've seen few projects that use small exchanges and still get fair results, devs don't have to give out big money to get on top exchanges there are other fair ones around for example bithumb

Compared to Binance, Bithumb is smaller but it belongs to the top sites in the market as we can see on its trading volume and its ranking.

https://coinmarketcap.com/rankings/exchanges/

I don't know how much a developers would pay to get listed in bithumb, but I'm pretty sure it's not cheap like those other exchanges mentioned above that are just faking their volume.

Bithumb is a better exchanges if put side by side with p2pb2b or latoken and vindax, im pretty sure that listing fee on bithumb is way lower than what binance will request from new developers it's just that many new devs are too stubborn, they don't even know that Coinmarketcap is a deceiver

they certainly are good enough if compared to the kind of p2pb2b or other that recklessly listing shitcoin and bithumb could be a great start for project that not have big enough funding to enter binance. developers too should aware that exchange is among most essential thing for a project to gain popularity.

How did you know that listing fees on Bithumb were low? if so then I think there will be many projects whose tokens are listed there and therefore cannot be compared Bithumb exchange with p2pb2b and vindax.

The presentation of the new IEO cannot be associated with the 3rd anniversary of the exchange's birth. For such purposes, free giveaways and contests are best suited. And everyone could get a limited edition NFT commemorative coin dedicated to the 3rd anniversary of the exchange.

Do not think like that. bithumb has good stories for projects that they hold and promote. it is not a matter of trading volume that makes prices for release on the exchange to do IEO. they have their provisions that must be prepared.

The success of new project after IEO is not the role that will play by an exchange, we have seen alot of project like Gold stablecoin which didnt do any initial offering and was also first listed on mid class exchange and still flourish in the market because their team consist experienced people in the field of IT blockchain, economic etc.
If the project team are not up to the task it will affect the success level of the project.

There is huge variety of different solutions coming onto the market, so I am here with the strategy I personally use. In my opinion, mine is pretty rational and can help to find the most advanced solution for you

Hey. There are many aspects that matter, indeed. And we are not only talking about the idea as the idea, but much more about complex approach. So curious to hear yours

Well, mine is the following - I am starting with the niche. For example, talking about me, I am fond of different progressive solutions. When the niche is chosen, I try to have a look at the solutions that are having the highest ratings along with real feedback from users. And then I am also evaluating things on my own, paying attention to team, future opportunities and more

Rational. Usually people just follow what everyone follows. But to be honest, I love your strategy more, kinda it is deeper and more objective. As you are into the industry, can you give me an example of the solution that meets your requirements?

Solution that I can definitely recommend you is Centric token. Centric is a web 3.0-based payment network composed of two digital tokens that promote stability, incentivize structure for early adopters, and safely store value. The exchange between the two tokens is governed by a decentralized smart contract and a self-regulating protocol. And guys are listed on Bittrex and other 3 exchanges. But you should Google them to check more

Yes you are right. The full form of ieo is initial exchange offering. So exchange matters a lots in this investment process. Mostly we see big projects now a days organize an ieo on some big exchange. And they successfully finish the collection round. Cause people trust big exchanges like binance or okex or kucoin. So when they offer something people are interested and people love to invest their money. And small or mid size exchanges offer normally not that good projects. But sometimes we see exception. But yes exchanges matter a lots in the ieo process.

Because by cooperating with an Exchange it is certain that the coins can be traded (can be sold in the market). it's no secret that people who make investments, campaigns, developers, they definitely choose coins that can generate profits, not junk coins that only settle in the wallet.

You are absolutely right because at the top exchange have a larger community so the chances of achieving greater success. for that many people like to join IEO which is done in binance and okex

Indeed, investors no longer trust most ICOs these days, but it will be different if it is IEO and partnered with top exchanges.
Conducting IEO on top exchanges is requiring many things and not easy, but the result will be paid off.
To gain investor's trust, you will need to pay the price, in this case : list on some reputable exchanges.

The leading exchanges in the market have many users, and they have enough budget to create hype for their IEOs. So when you invest in projects there, you will definitely get a profit, but to be able to participate, you need to be lucky because there are many people who participate like you.

Bithumb is better Compared to Vindax and p2pb2b, but not compared to binance and okex because binance and okex is top exchange in whole crypto industry, also real trade real investor, no fake volume not bot trading....

In order to get a good initial fund, it is true that popular exchange can boost the popularity of the project, but also remember that many projects carried out on popular exchanges have decreased significantly when traded a few months later.

There was a basic knowledge of investors and when the coin can be traded on the exchange site instantly and then it can try to join into the hype and that will make the price of coin go to the moon.
This is a common knowledge that has already known by almost all of people.

Right now we have seen many projects that use big exchanges and raise fund easily and their token value tripled up, I'm sure new developers are aware of all these success but still we are seeing new projects using p2pb2b exchange for IEO, it's obvious that they know what they are doing.

Using well and established exchange attracts more investors interest, the amount of risk coming from investors are
lessen when they've support projects who uses reputable exchange.



Developers who are not fully funded still use exchange that don't have much interest from investors, most of investors avoid
such type of place knowing that their investment are not safe.

For exchanges like p2pb2b or latoken, there is certainly not much hope for investors because the IEO projects there are not liquid and very few investors participate. I think the IEO projects listed there are all bad projects and you will definitely only feel worse when investing. It is best to choose only exchanges like Binance or Huobi to join IEO because these exchanges have great reputation in the market.

You are right, binance and Huobi are the best for IEO right now. if there is an IEO is a small meeting or with a bad reputation then forget it immediately. it will take our money for free.

You are absolutely right. Some exchanges kill good projects doing IEOs on Thier exchange. And ICO was actually the best channel for projects to make it but scammers spoilt everything now making things difficult for projects to survive because investors interests are no longer on ICO but IEO growth is from exchange anyways.

Certainly, you are correct mate, if the exchange is not on top in the market for sure the coin will be list on that platform
will not become successful in the end. This will exist only for a short period of time. However, if the coin will be list on the exchange such as kucoin, Binance, Bibox, Houbi, and more that are on top surely the coin will become successful in the end.

Up to 70% of the IEO scam projects are available in this market and certainly if you choose to exchange like latoken, vindax, p2pb2p, your chances of making a profit will be zero.

I have never been to IEO at these exchanges and do not want to mention it because you only have to invest money. Personally, I like to participate in IEOs at Binance, Kucoin, Okex, Gate and these are my 4 most favorite exchanges when investing.

Projects that carry out IEO in good exchanges are not necessarily sure they will succeed, let alone projects that do IEO on strange exchanges. But the success of the project in doing IEO is not only because of a good exchange, but because the project indeed has something unique and their goals are truly innovative

good exchanges are not arbitrary to choose the IEO project, they do the analysis first,
which is done by Binance, Huobi and even probit like that, so IEO who is there is a good project

Yes, this is true. exchages is the answers, for me no matter how bad of project is, if doing IEO in binance i will trust it, because only serious project can hire big exchanges such as binance. Opposite, no matter how good of project is, if IEO in p2pb2b or vindax i will stay away. I don't like take a risks and safe investment is my choice

But the project developers must provide a lot of money if want to make IEO on a large Exchange like Binance, Okex, or Huobi. I think that is the reason why many Devs make their IEO on Exchange small, like p2pb2b, Latoken etc. They only pay a little money for an IEO there.

Only a few projects that have capital to finance their IEO are clearly low exchange able to ease their burden to launch IEO will remain a risk will be bad when IEO fails at low exchange.

Ofcourse exchanges play a big roll in the success of an IEO because of TRUST. Top exchanges would give relief to investors and could gain trust on your project. But we all know only few can do thay because of budget. Top exchanges means pricey fees.

For budget reasons, if it's a good project, I don't think it's a reason not to make IEO on a large Exchange, because a good project certainly has enough backup funds, funds for development or funds for listing on the Exchange.

because the cost is expensive to do IEO on an exchange, then we can know which projects are serious in working on the project. I am pretty sure that those who do IEO in binance will really do the development of the project. it's because of the costs they incur, and this reinforces our opinion that the project was really serious about wanting to work on the concept they made.

True! When a project agrees to pay a lot of fee to be listed IEO on large exchanges, it's more likely to be a serious project. A scam project will avoid paying money as much as possible to keep their pocket full. Large exchange plays an important role in the successful of IEO projects, listed on large exchanges can bring a lot of advantages for developers!

But don't get too secure with the name of the exchanges only. Even top exchange like Binance will not ensure that the project will fail later on. There are many factors to consider being a successful project. Not only the exchange where it undertook its IEO, but the actual development after the sale. Without progress, the project would find it hard to increase its value in the market. The team should not stop their development updates to the community to know that they are keeping on track with their milestones. Because the truth is, most of these projects are in silent mode after finishing their sales.

Not all projects that make it to binance will have good future that's why it's bad to rely on top exchanges, few days ago binance announced that they will delist few altcoins from their exchange, I bet the project aren't good anymore

You are right. Everything about an IEO is depends on the exchange's transparency & the trust they have built over the years.

Currently, IEO is looking not too good. Some exchanges are beginning to host projects that their audit is not clear. Investors believe in such exchange but other things are happening behind.

To avoid this situation, you should choose IEO of big exchanges like Binance, Huobi, Kucoin, Gate .. Those are the biggest exchanges in this market and you will be safe with the projects there.

If altcoin is still in another exchange and with good liquidity, then I think it's fine, but there is little influence, sometimes binance dumps when altcoin is delistinated.
But believe that token will not become extinct.

Success of IEO is listing om Binance. Very simple. P.S. Cashback is the must if you actively trade on Binance. Join this chat https://t.me/cashback_binance_30_en and get the new ref link, create new account and get 30% cash back from all your trades!

The success of projects has alot ot do with exchangers but beyond exchangers, investors still carry out researches on what to do and how to do it and also what things people are supposed to expect of a successful project. the timeline/roadmap and its step by step implementation is also key in contributing to the success of the project.

New projects get listed on small exchanges for different reasons, some is because the team can't afford top exchanges and some is because the team intentionally use small exchanges, it's better to go for projects that use top exchanges

Exactly, for a project to succeed they need a great exchange like binance as you mentioned, but remember that the team needs to source for fund to finance the IEO and exchange like binance have their fees on the High side which may be difficult for an average project to afford. It takes a whole lot to have ones token tradable on global exchange like binance which also means that the project would need to be up and doing to afford the cost of maintaining their tokens on the exchange.

Well there's some IEO that turns out to be a failure after being held by binance so it's not a 100% guarantee that they gonna succeed but they just got the opportunity of being known by so many people since binance is already known as popular exchange and have large user base.

True, IEO on exchanges need to be talked about on this forum because of newbies, it's better to leave projects that use small exchanges to raise fund or do IEO because there will be problem with fund raising, top exchanges IEO are better

Projects from big exchanges are also become worthless after a while due to the dump from the initial investors so no matter how big the exchange is it is only for fund raising but the success of project depends on lot other factors.And for newbies it is not advised to invest on the new projects where the risk is huge so they always have to go with coins like bitcoin.

yes you are right because p2pb2b or vindax is an exchange that has a very bad reputation and can even be said that projects that do IEO there are guaranteed to die soon, because indeed investors will never believe in exchanges of nonsense

Okex and Probit in my opinion are not much successful, especially for Okex because it seems they have been fooled this month by a scam project. but I can't blame okex because this project is a bit smart to manipulate their website and IEO to be held there has been takedown by Okex, for Probit some of previous IEO i think failed, but there are some upcoming IEO they look interesting like corion x it seems would be good.

the right reason, if the developer only wants to benefit from investors and is not serious about running the project he is working on so he can only try to target the tokens that he launches can only be registered on a small exchange. projects like this that we must avoid, because on average after their tokens enter the exchange market there will be manipulation of the trading volume conducted by the development team itself

talking about IEO is currently a new alternative investment choice besides in ICO. but the problem is that most of the IEO is currently listed on shady exchanges especially on PROBIT, p2pb2b, & Vindax. and I also agree that the success of IEO depends on investor interest and can be listed on the top exchanges, especially like Binance, Okex, Kucoin.

When you IEO on the top exchange, even if it not able to meet the IEO's goal, it still has a good publicity to catch the potential investor. So yes, projects should do whatever they can to get their IEO on the top exchange rather than the low tier exchange like p2pb2b.

You are partially right. It all depends on the project and on the people who are working on it. In principle, it is enough to get acquainted with the idea of the project and with the development team to understand whether it is worth investing. IEO may end like ICO

We know that without a new cryptocurrency, the future can't be good for crypto. Until Bitcoin is on the bullrun, we can buy any exchange coin after IEO is finished. This is the best plan to buy low, but selling high only depends on your research. Binance, Houbi, Kucoin and gate exchange can't give a good ROI to the investors for a long time. Always ready to fill up your bag during correction time.

There is absolutely no doubt that the success of IEO depends on Exchanges and  other factors , but the issue here is that some of the project  developers do not have enough funds to pay for those big Exchanges or their project do not meet the criteria for IEO  listing .And when that get listed.  happens they have no alternative than to go to smaller Exchanges and  get listed which in turn affect the success of such projects.

The importance of listing on a good exchange cannot be overemphasised. The project gets more visibility and this would attract investors who can fund the project and ensure that the desire of the team comes to fruition. Most of the exchange find it difficult to list in these big exchanges because their projects are below standard and they cannot meet up with requirements of the big exchange who are committed to listing only good projects.

IEO will end up like an ICO if they implement IEO on small exchanges in this market. I have seen many projects collapsed and could not succeed when IEO in Latoken exchanges, P2PB2B .. It is clear that exchange will determine the success or failure of that project.

Where does the Exchange come in as the reason for success or failure? Trust will be dependent on the owners of the IEO. Investors will want to rely on the trust of the owners and the partner too will be looking at the trust rating of the owners and developers of the IEO. So in my opinion, The Exchanges are just being rubbished for accepting IEOs without  credible owners.

The success of IEO is clearly not just by how big the exchanges are. It's just one of many points to giving your project a strong push to reach its full potential. Good use case, clear direction, good dev, strong support from followers is also one of many positive points to improve too, not just exchange alone. Tho, yeah, if you have IEO on a bad exchange, no matter how good your project is, you will likely have a hard time meeting the IEO goal.

Yeah you are absolutely right. In most of the cases exchanges are the main bone for an ieo. Iris are very popular now a days. And when icos are almost gone from the market this new investment strategy came to the market. And it's now very popular and in many cases highly profitable. And normally if a big exchange offers a ieo it's going to give big amounts of profits. But small and mid exchange's ieos are not that great. People now trust big exchanges and in term of the security they go for ieos cause there is no chance to go for scams or something like that. That's why the success of ieos are mainly based on exchange.

Exchange does influence IEOs of many successful IEOs held on major exchanges, Huobi, Bithumb, and Bitfinex,
but projects you really have to analyze first if you want to invest, because this is a crypto world, risk is huge

The success of IEO depends not only on listing in Big exchange but also type of project, team performance etc. It is to confece that listing IEO on top exchanges like Binance, OkEx will put huge positive impact on token sale rather than listing on vindax, p2pb2b, hotbit etc. Such low quality exchanges listing IEO will put negative impact and lackage of investors. Ultimately ieo results will be  poor.

More important than an exchange for an IEO is the hype that it has created in the community, if there is a lot of hype around the project and even if it is being sold on a bad exchange then also the investors can earn tons of profit by selling the token as after a small amount of time the coin will most probably be picked by a big exchange like binance, OkEx etc. Also I don't deny the fact that actually exchanges are the part of a listing that makes a reputation of the token being listed, if exchange is good then token will definitely see a lot of investors.

good exchange can make an altcoin project even more famous, I saw the incidence of all the altcoins that entered Binance,
such as MBL, JUST etc. experiencing a high increase, and of course for IEO will also be affected

In fact, the end of IEO does not mean that a project is successful.After that there are several processes.In many cases the team can have done it with some investment of its own.For him, it can be said that the success of a project largely depends on the success of its actual value in the market.

I can confirm IEO at exchanges like p2pb2b, latoken will never have good results because exchanges are hardly interested by any investors and will definitely only cost you more time when choosing invest. I think if you are investing those coins consider selling as soon as possible because the likelihood of losing your money on those projects is very high.

The demand will come from the exchange site that has a very good reputation. People will actually use the exchange site that has already popular among the crypto investors and users.
This is the fact and it can't be argued anymore. Small exchange site gives small chance for the IEO to be successful.

Indeed, the first step of the IEO's success is also the most important, choosing an exchange that starts the IEO process and being listed, most people will be more interested in reputable and large-cap exchanges in this market because their principles and options are very strict, need to be a quality project and best to be listed. The first IEOs on binance were prime examples, their success was enormous while others were not chosen and directed towards other exchanges, they often become junk in investor comments

Surely the OP will lose money investing in those projects, which are bullshit projects and don't have any volumes. I have never seen any successful projects in there, the price has dropped many times over IEO price. If you want to make profits from the IEO, choose major exchanges like Binance, OKex ...

What the OP said was true that the IEO place had a big influence on the token price after the IEO ended and also on investor confidence going on. The big exchanges can make prices bow high above stars because investors believe in the market's capabilities i think, I don't know what happened inside, but that's how it has been.

Of course, IEOs conducted in small markets will experience high failure rates because investors are very few, it's better to choose an IEO that is carried out in a large market it's easier to get big profits

Even exchanges who carried out in a large market cap can't make all projects successful. It's truely depend on the project's concept ,adoption from the community and advisors panel, IMO. For an example, Serum did IEO on FTX which had strong advisors panel from the crypto community and it's pumped 10x when it listed. Also, their concept was good for the crypto community as well.

Nope, you're just throwing ideas and thoughts. There's hundreds of projects that started without IEO, ICO, without crowdfunding and without any funds and it's still alive and moving forward in success! You seem like an excited man toward IEO and toward the big exchanges but here we must talk about reality and we should really focus on analysis other than bullshit.

This is all very relative. There are exchanges with a low rating on which the sale is carried out. There are projects that after the sale grow ~ + 4X and then fall to -50x ... So this is not a panacea. Crooks are on the alert and looking for new ways to cheat

I agree with this, even if a project has a bad use case top exchanges like binance or bitmax will never list them or accept their IEO launchpad offer because they don't want to get their reputations ruined by a scam project or a bad project

Yes, I agree that the large exchanges have a big role in the success of the IEO, with their millions of investors and they have great promotional marketing for the project, which leads to an increase in the demand for the project's tokens, Unlike small exchanges that take simple fees and have no capabilities, and have no reputation and spread, which leads to the failure or death of the project, but the project must have an innovative idea and a clear use of blockchain.

The small exchange site can bring huge demand and support to the token and this have made the project die instantly consider the demand and support are the main thing that have already searched to give a lot of impact to the price when it comes to the trade on the exchange site.

Reputation of exchange site will determine the result.

For every new projects that want to use exchange to gather development fund a better exchange is the best choice, there are whales and strong investors on top exchanges that's why OP recommend top exchanges for IEO

ordinary people can buy IEO coins that pass on major exchanges only after listing. People just can't be so fast to buy coins on IEO.

Trust from investors is hard to get because many scam projects has scammed many investors in past ICOs.
What the project can do to build the trust is by listing IEO on reliable and renowned cryptocurrency exchanges so the investors can rest assured.

Top exchanges gives new projects everything they would dream of to bring their project to the masses easily, top exchanges offers stronger exposure and adoption at same time and still make sure your project raised the hardcap like a piece of cake.

Serum is a really good project in this market, they will still be successful if they do ICO. Therefore, the quality of the project will be the most important, if the project is good enough, they will attract interest and investment.

now the exchanges that be trend in IEO or after presale was uniswap. look so many project could rise multiply from initial price, even it could beat gain IEO project on reputable exchanges.many people shilling project in several telegram group so make people interested and make hype from it. so the success was about shilling

You are right.
Vindax is a worst exchange.
I lost my money by investing on vindax IEO.

Yup, you are absolutely right. IEO stands for initial exchange offering. And the the time of icos gone. There are lots of scams and fraud. People started to refuse ico investment. So this new investment techniques  came to the market. And people are liking this. Cause it's profitable and the risk factors are low. Cause when a big exchange offer an ieo they did a lots of research and so people don't have to think about being scammed. But there are still many small and medium exchange available those are offering not so good project. And that's kind of projects many times failed. So yeah the success of ieos are exchange's success.

Because of the IEO the exchanges start to make list of all scam projects without a proper investigation first before letting the scam one freely trade on their exchange. Some might be ok i IEO made in a big exchanges like binance as we all know how effectively this site are grow and very trusted one also. Not all will survived but one will surely stand still till the end.. keep on trying and learn something from it.

one of the factors like that exchangers are a very strong attraction to be able to attract as many investors as possible let alone a project capable of doing IEO in a big market like binance Of course the demand is very high and the tokens will be sold before the end time, that's what can happen

Large exchangers are one of the attractions for investors who invest in an IEO, and of course this provides several benefits for investors, so that, they avoid fraud as often happens in ICO, and we can see some quite successful IEO projects happening on Binance and several other large exchangers due to the factor of investor confidence in large exchangers, so that, the IEO project can get its sales target, I really agree, as you said, if the IEO project wants to be successful, of course, a large exchanger must be an absolute choice.

Not really, it's just that when an IEO is listed on an Exchange, let alone a large Exchange, has a strong influence on the community and investors. IEOs that take place on major exchanges make most investors interested in taking short profits.