The success of IEO is Exchange

[Psynthax]

It's true but it is also true that exchange like Binance don't launch any IEO offer they get. they evaluate before listing it and also they charge a huge fee. That's why, some IEO goes with poor exchanges which result them no success at all.

those projects should review their project first and consider whether it is deserve to be listed in a top exchange or not rather than giving up and go straight to the shittiest exchange there is. there is reason why binance only have IEO once a month or longer they put quality first rather than quantity.

[1715551371]

1715551371

[1715551371]

1715551371

[1715551371]

1715551371

[1715551371]

1715551371

[Mianae]

No. IEO success is not dependent on the exchnage but on project product and marketing skills. We feel Binance IEOs are successful because its on Binance no that's not true. Before being on Binance the project have made enough marketing commitment to get there.

[gweedo]

Based on my personal observation, I can say that the success of IEO mostly relies on the reputation of the exchange, when it's in a bad exchange, people will not invest on it as people now are looking on the exchange where the IEO is happening.

It's like the success of altcoins relies on bitcoin... so if bitcoin will rise, people will tend to invest in altcoins as well.
When IEO in bad exchange, people will not invest, but when it's in Binance, people are very aggressive in investing.

we can take the Cartesi as a good example on why Binance makes a project successful.

https://cryptopotato.com/ieos-are-not-dead-binance-latest-cartesi-ctsi-skyrockets-400-during-its-first-hours-of-trading/

IEOs Are Not Dead: Binance Latest – Cartesi (CTSI) – Skyrockets 400% During Its First Hours Of Trading

It is clear that IEO is not dead. But not all IEOs succeed in this market. If IEO wants to be successful then they need to be done at leading exchanges in this market such as Binance, OKex. Gate, MXC exchange ... those are hype and reputation. So the IEO projects there will certainly be successful and have a very high profit rate

[Byakuga]

You are very right, i equally agree that the success of any ieo projects depends solely on the type of exchanges used.

If you consider recent events, hackenai chose wrongly when it selected oceanex, the ieo crawled to perfection and only a round conducted i suppose.

The only coin that had immense success that i can remember outside kucoin, Binance and OKEx is the sero platform that happened on gateio.

Nonetheless, always dyor and ensure to pick your profits

Every projects that goes on gate.io for IEO became successful, gate .io is no nonsense exchange, there are still few good exchanges out there especially in Asia part of the world, the reason why new projects choose small exchanges is because of fund

[skeleto88]

Include Latoken as one of those exchanges that does not have any good reputation and as far as I know every project that held their IEO in latoken were unsuccessful. Better hold and IEO in probitctjan those low key exchanges. It really depends on how good or reputable the exchange and Team effort to be able to bring the projects into success.

[samcrypto]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

Top exchanges are too strict with their IEO and most of them succeed within a month so its a good idea to be on the top exchange instead of a shit exchange. I also support IEO’s on Binance because they have the best hype but it will still depend on a project, remember that not all IEO’s succeed in long term and big exchange can’t help them on that.

[InwardContour]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

I totally agree with this, the success of an IEO depends on the exchange chosen but not entirely. In as much as doing IEO of big exchanges like Binance, OKEX, HUOBI, KUCOIN etc will give very high chances of being successful (selling out), people also consider the team behind the project and what they have to offer. Personally i dont participate in IEOs done on petty exchanges with low reputation because most likely they end up not being successful or they lie about the outcome just to lure in people when trading commences after listing.

[Balladtony77]

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

[betty11]

if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

P2pb2b and Vindax are sisters of death, you conduct IEO there, it's as good as you have failed, all projects I followed there never made it from the pipe line, while projects that got listed there after IEO are useless in price. They will some day close down because it's a fake volume and bot paradise.

[aji567]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

it's true that the success of IEO lies in the exchange, just look at IEO solana which is in binance. we know that community interest in binance is very strong. and finally solana rises rapidly.

[Script3d]

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

The more the users an exchange has the more an IEO is gonna succeed. But the projects needs to convince the investors first to invest in their project, conducting an IEO on a top exchange does not mean guarantee success but rather more chances of success.

[Twinkledoe]

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

The more the users an exchange has the more an IEO is gonna succeed. But the projects needs to convince the investors first to invest in their project, conducting an IEO on a top exchange does not mean guarantee success but rather more chances of success.

Yes, even if you choose a top notch exchange and you have nothing to offer to the community, I don't think people will gonna invest. I guess by now people are smarter in checking the projects. And sometimes they are looking now for the actual product before spending money to crypto projects because they have had enough already. Relying on great promises is really not a thing anymore. They want tangible plans and products.

[Taskford]

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

The more the users an exchange has the more an IEO is gonna succeed. But the projects needs to convince the investors first to invest in their project, conducting an IEO on a top exchange does not mean guarantee success but rather more chances of success.

Yes, even if you choose a top notch exchange and you have nothing to offer to the community, I don't think people will gonna invest. I guess by now people are smarter in checking the projects. And sometimes they are looking now for the actual product before spending money to crypto projects because they have had enough already. Relying on great promises is really not a thing anymore. They want tangible plans and products.

I don't think top notch exchange will accept them if they don't have something to offer on their community since if you look on binance they are actually doing a great performance on their IEO and most of the coin added on their launchpad got a higher chances of success rate that's why we are seeing them competitive compare to the other tokens who conduct a IEO on small tier exchange which turn scam immediately. I remember Probit is one of the example where scam IEO goes so we should take extra precaution on this exchange.

[shoreno]

Exchanges are what determines the success of any IEO projects, it's simple as that, high or top exchanges get things done easily, hardcap will be met and token will have better value too

The more the users an exchange has the more an IEO is gonna succeed. But the projects needs to convince the investors first to invest in their project, conducting an IEO on a top exchange does not mean guarantee success but rather more chances of success.

Yes, even if you choose a top notch exchange and you have nothing to offer to the community, I don't think people will gonna invest. I guess by now people are smarter in checking the projects. And sometimes they are looking now for the actual product before spending money to crypto projects because they have had enough already. Relying on great promises is really not a thing anymore. They want tangible plans and products.

I don't think top notch exchange will accept them if they don't have something to offer on their community since if you look on binance they are actually doing a great performance on their IEO and most of the coin added on their launchpad got a higher chances of success rate that's why we are seeing them competitive compare to the other tokens who conduct a IEO on small tier exchange which turn scam immediately. I remember Probit is one of the example where scam IEO goes so we should take extra precaution on this exchange.

oh ok so op here missed something . i agree on you guys a project needs both and not just by looking forward being listed on a good exchange . for sure there are ieo that also listed on binance but they havent  go enough investors because they are lacking of something that majority of people are looking for . also there are also ieo that became succesful on an exchange that are not really that popular.  im not saying these exchange are bad tho

[daniahya]

Yes, even if you choose a top notch exchange and you have nothing to offer to the community, I don't think people will gonna invest. I guess by now people are smarter in checking the projects. And sometimes they are looking now for the actual product before spending money to crypto projects because they have had enough already. Relying on great promises is really not a thing anymore. They want tangible plans and products.

certainly investors have now begun to choose projects that have real products, not only to make promises, so not all projects that hold IEO in large markets get a lot of funds all depending on the products they offer and the profits that will be obtained by investors

[Kotone]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

If you like to lose money go there on p2pb2b for an IEO. That exchange is one of the worst platform, they dont even have transparency for the project collections they just said the IEO is done and the counter of their sales of the project is too suspicious. IEO is good way of fundraising but some platform only take advantage of the idea and not preserved the welfare of their investors. See how Binance do it well, and the feedback on every IEO is always as expected huge success.

[el kaka22]

You may think that an exchange listing that IEO gives the project a credibility and that is correct, however being there is already something special and that means the project was good to begin with. Do you really think exchanges are willing to put shitty projects on their websites?

I mean that would only hurt business if the people who fund that gets poorer, you need to make people as much money as you can as an exchange in order for them to continue trading with you, the more money they have the more they will trade and the more they trade the more trading fee you will get. Hence if a project is getting an IEO from a reputable place, that means they were already good even without the IEO as well, they just got the recognition that they are as good as they think.

[Doranile432]

It's true but it is also true that exchange like Binance don't launch any IEO offer they get. they evaluate before listing it and also they charge a huge fee. That's why, some IEO goes with poor exchanges which result them no success at all.

Binance is just sending out messages to other new projects, bout how serious they should be, binance have no issue listing any project if they are good enough, developers should start working on something better

[Mighty_crypt]

In future CZ will make crypto more opened to the world and people will easily make safe investment option, starting with coinmarketcap many investors still make crypto investment decisions using Coinmarketcap, and this makes me think that IEO will become more popular soon

[mdzahed134]

Some of the many IEO on the p2pb2b and lower-class exchanges have created manipulations and dust coins, worthless and pathetic bad platforms. The only IEO that has the most welfare for investors is Binance.

You're absolutely true lower exchanges we're hosted all of the garbage projects. And those are picked too much easily because of small figure listing fees but in there major exchanges shit projects can't afford, reputed exchanges never conducted IEO's for lower projects. A lot of difficulties to negotiate for the biggest exchanges. I see massive different in major and lower exchanges categories.