Bitcoin Forum

I am trying to understand the connection. Sorry I am very poor in it :-P

How do you get these two addresses connected to find that the address 17k4EVPznuTQ7q7CujbFFvTqx97ff6CZZN is connected with the user figmentofmyass? I am using it as an example to understand your table format?

I am trying to understand the connection. Sorry I am very poor in it :-P

How do you get these two addresses connected to find that the address 17k4EVPznuTQ7q7CujbFFvTqx97ff6CZZN is connected with the user figmentofmyass? I am using it as an example to understand your table format?

Probably some from Column A and some from Column B.

I think it'll be some from Column A and some from Column B.

as they say, the trend is your friend, until it ends.

The trend is your friend until it ends. :)

...

1BRevoHgfXeoqR5WhgxG754NukPdssxxBK
1HYS3m1YbdFHC27ZSzR1SD1s6oAYjYe1rh
12Jtg2ARpNEA1Q9HdfMpuk9PZgj4KMEScD
1QF6GW9tNx7MFXkD2eAr7FsN9oXhnHYHvp
1KjHbeCHrc3hs7rxD5Zw6koDMLDFFxuWDs
1Pfrk4NL6FycDnxph4KrcZib7w7E8YRJLN

https://blockpath.com/

edit: list of everyone

...
3764    manchester93 :(
...
4248    illyiller :(
...
4590    figmentofmyass :(
...
5090    squatter :(
...
5240    romani245 :(
...
5340    exstasie :(
...
5560    MAbtc :(
...
5650    illinest :(
...
6000    marky89 :(

running list of SwC poker handles:

Which is too bad because he's quite an intelligent guy.

(...), and playing poker with himself figmentofmyass vs manchester93 it's a winwin situation for him until he lose it all :D

122h7dmX8vcdNnWjfbz1eevD8tfcJasBWV

...

figmentofmyass joined Chipmixer campaign Week 20
exstasie - Week 25
Squatter - Week 31
Current week is 194
So this 3 accounts have been milking Chipmixer for more than 3 years.

No surprise that your username were one of the most searchable words lately (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5307119.0).

I did the spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gsSA0_hoEbK6ezfzdW-BdIGxzc-hfiO0H-AvRyNTA0s/edit#gid=2014617640) for the SwC poker series and tbf he never joined with the NEpats93 account there. And it was organized by efialtis, while the currently running Poker Series at Betnomi, where he plays/played as well, is organized by Yahoo.

Just for clarification, not for defending or judging :)

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

your investigations always explode with a lot of emotions.

Perhaps the manager will draw the right conclusions, and it will be fair if Nutildah can take an honest place in the ChipMixer subscription.

i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

has there been a statement or at least a reaction or apology from figmentofmyass? ::)
i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

Having multiple accounts in the same campaign is not a banable offense. Those accounts will get tagged and excluded from trust lists and that's about it.

The only reason for a ban would be ban evading, if one of his alts is banned already. I don't think that's the case.

he didn't break any of the forum's rule. he is not going to be banned.

then i have said nothing :P :P ;D

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

in fact you're right. I know many members who think that figmentofmyass is a great user and that he's contributed alot to this forum. they consider him as their mentor FGS!! he owe them an apology or at least an explanation.

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

BFOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

PN7 was exposed mainly on linguistic proof.

why?

FOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

And the private and/or federated model can work too -- I think that's the proposal for Liquid -- but it doesn't need to be private.

In those cases, using a federated model like Liquid seems better than a single point of failure like a Bitcoin exchange.

they are making assumptions about peel chains many, many hops out.

They use complex peel chains and mixing, then use Chinese agents to sell to OTC brokers who interface with Huobi, OKEx, and other lax exchanges.

The obvious alternatives in the aftermath were Paxful and LocalCryptos, although the number of offers is always disappointing.

I've since moved on to LocalCryptos. It's nowhere near as active as the old LBC, but I managed to make one cash trade recently -- for a good price too.

check out localcryptos. buyers using paypal are paying 25-50% over market: https://localcryptos.com/Bitcoin/PayPal/Buy

~snip~

Anyway, it seems any doubt was removed by the 4th post in this thread or so. I have tagged all 9 accounts. Exstasie is no longer DT2 and FOMA is very excluded from DT1, so not much more to be done at the moment.

... so not much more to be done at the moment.

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

Thanks for this, that's a good tool I'll probably use in the future.

What's sad is this guy has been entering his alts together in contests for a long time, too... Not very cool.

He entered all 9 accounts in a giveaway held by El Duderino:


Even worse is figmentofmyass has been helping to organize online poker tournaments for Bitcointalk users. I took a look and sure enough, he plays in tournaments with himself:


This just crossed into scumbag territory.

Which is too bad because he's quite an intelligent guy. Hope he didn't think he'd get away with it forever.

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

He wouldn't be the first CM signature campaign member who stopped posting after removal.

Sure.
can you provide some examples?

figmentofmyass joined Chipmixer campaign Week 20

exstasie - Week 25

Squatter - Week 31

Current week is 194

So this 3 accounts have been milking Chipmixer for more than 3 years.

ChipMixer's campaign is one of the rare ones with no weekly quotas. But he was able to consistently post close to 50 posts per week on two, sometimes three of his accounts without lowering the post quality too much, since he hasn't been removed for that after thee years, but due to his sloppiness (or refusal to use the service he's been advertising :P). Anyway, that sounds like a part-time job, at the very least. And he got caught just as the rates have been decreased by >75%.

...

if he did, then he doesn't need a job at least for 3-4 years.

Another good example is this one. This guy said, "as they say", so I wondered who does he mean by "they" because I've never heard the expression said that way before. It turns out it was himself.

as they say

A phrase used to introduce a well-known or commonly used saying.
And the rest, as they say, is history.

as they ˈsay (also as the saying ˈgoes) often used before or after a saying or an idiom: We can kill two birds with one stone, as they say. ♢ He was, as the saying goes, as mad as a hatter.

~Advertising a mixer and getting caught on blockchain evidence is quite ironic.

gentlemand https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1298899162

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155345

Stopped posting and logging in just after he was removed from the campaign, and hasn't returned since. TBH, I wouldn't be surprised if he had more accounts.

This is good news.
I was a bit concerned about gentlemand since I thought that his account got hacked; his account is somewhat close to the "specs" from an account seller (https://archive.is/K5WXj).
Maybe you notify him to check account and maybe change password, just in case.

do more than 35 post a week Is something extremely difficult, how could he do more than 40 post a week with @figmentofmyass and @exstasie accounts and still have good post quality?

this guy is a legend. he managed to drain a lot of money from the chipmixer for years and see that this is not something that anyone can do... he has good post quality even with many accounts. it looks like he has nothing to do in the real world.

If these guys all used the same device for posting then I'd imagine one of them would've posted something using the wrong account and get busted much earlier.

Wonder if they just have a bunch of cheap chromebooks that they use to keep everything separated.

It can be done easily with each user having his own browser (Chrome, FFox, Edge, Brave, Opera, ...) on the same machine
or, for clearer difference and avoiding surprises, with separate virtual machines installed for each.
That part is the least problem imho.

(However, I'm still shocked about these findings, since we don't talk here about the usual shitposters).

gentlemand https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1298899162

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155345

Stopped posting and logging in just after he was removed from the campaign, and hasn't returned since. TBH, I wouldn't be surprised if he had more accounts.

Eh, I average 75 posts on a good week and it's not unusual to see me at 60 posts per week. And there are some people here who can do even more than 75 (I read in his services thread for example that @Ratimov can do over 100 posts a week).

Wonder if they just have a bunch of cheap chromebooks that they use to keep everything separated.

Hi and thank you primedice!!!  ;D

BTC- 1PNNDcjJ9kvR3fWdB3woQgLPDvLE7P59Q5
primedice- 09be597a82
twitter- BCgamer01

Bitcointalk Username: illinest
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359850
Twitter account: https://twitter.com/BCgamer01
Twitter Audit: https://www.twitteraudit.com/BCgamer01
Total followers: 863
Onion Address: DXBHBXycF77js2LJvJb2HBNDezqGAgdGQA

I'm in: https://twitter.com/ChikunArise/status/933488972814102528

How will you contact the winners?

Twitter Username: @ChikunArise
BTC Address: 1CmQgS6TYzXh8inEGsrPA8VbqMyBaeCPjv
Notes: Thanks a lot!

https://twitter.com/ChikunArise
1F8DggHBMrVzChhHWeYhCeVWGBspxextL6

thanks

Done. Fingers crossed! :)
https://twitter.com/CryptoG99/status/933491762739404801

Twitter: https://twitter.com/CryptoG99
Rollin address: 1KauicxbLWVEAEibvAkWWJYAGtqW3rnhoH
Thanks. Grin

Twitter Username: @CryptoG99
BTC Address: 1FXpH6NjGMP595ZAaRq8pRPSMbotqyY6L3
Notes: Thanks a lot!

Twitter Username: @WPMason1
BTC Address: 1DjoC18ADsYqjBerDRpxvyqwkYo4jotLQv
Notes: Thanks a lot!

BTC: 1greEnsUXGv5CDQSeJNskmsruFi5RV2CL
primedice.com: 2a42e7cb4f
twitter (i followed you): WPMason1

THANKS!!!!!!!

It seems that @figmentofmyass, not only cheated on the @ChipMixer campaign, they were also involved in selling accounts.

Because:@nutildah, he has burned all the alt accounts, we can be sure that there are no other Alt accounts in the future that can be sold or rigged.

There are four more Alt accounts that are owned by:@figmentofmyass, they use the same Twitter account to make a living on this forum.

Twitter @BCgamer01 is used by: @illinest and @HarHarHar9965.

Connect:

1. HarHarHar9965 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131686)

https://archive.is/Pp6a2

https://archive.is/wip/aPfBq

---

And other Twitter accounts: @ChikunArise, also used by: @romani245, @Marbit and @AceWallen.

Connect:

2. Marbit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120267)
3. AceWallen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131681)

https://archive.is/wip/9w2UI

Post by: Marbit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323615.msg3466617#msg3466617)
https://archive.is/wip/O61yP

Post by: AceWallen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818725.msg11619567#msg11619567)
https://archive.is/wip/43FNA

---

And in my opinion, the main account @figmentofmyass has not been used since 2017 and there is already a red sign (sale).

Twitter @CryptoG99 is used by: @manchester93, @HarHarHar9965 you @Argwai96.

Connect:

4. Argwai96 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131421)

https://archive.is/wip/VmZCZ

Post by: HarHarHar9965 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818725.msg11619604#msg11619604)
https://archive.is/wip/NLDtM

Post by: Argwai96 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323615.msg3466640#msg3466640)
https://archive.is/wip/uog8A

This is proof of account sale by: @Argwai96.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=131421

See Top posters on Bitcointalk in the past 7 days (https://loyce.club/active/7d.html): only a few people post more than 100 posts per week.

Eh, I average 75 posts on a good week and it's not unusual to see me at 60 posts per week. And there are some people here who can do even more than 75 (I read in his services thread for example that @Ratimov can do over 100 posts a week).

when I saw this list the first thing I thought was to run to see what the position of @figmentofmyass was and he is in the position 747

https://i.imgur.com/0wSUcQS.png

but if we count all his accounts, the guy could do more than 100 posts a week. this guy is legend


two years ago i was able to do up to 60 post per week ... i think if my memory is not failing i still haven't managed to do 70 a week since i'm here at bitcointalk.

currently I can't post 40 post a week.

Also wonder if mods knew this by IP the entire time and kept their mouths shut..

Do you guys hope he stops posting on all of his accounts and goes away forever, or do you think he is still a somewhat valuable member of the community even though he gamed the system to make more coin?

Would an admission and apology from him help any?
Where do you think he really stands now?

Do you guys hope he stops posting on all of his accounts and goes away forever, or do you think he is still a somewhat valuable member of the community even though he gamed the system to make more coin?

Would an admission and apology from him help any?
Where do you think he really stands now?

Only theymos and Cyrus have access to IP logs, not the moderators. I would also be very surprised if it turned out they were arbitrarily looking up user's IP logs just for the fun of it without some prior suspicion or indication.

I personally don’t think bending the rules of a signature campaign is all that big of a deal..

Rules:
...
5. Enrolling alts will result in both of your accounts removed without payment.

I think entering multiple alts in a free contest is much more “cheating” than breaking a sig campaign rule..
In fact I’m not even sure “cheating” the campaign is the correct word to use if he did in fact create all of that quality content and therefore quality advertising which probably had zero effect on the value of advertising he was paid to provide..

I’m failing to see any financial damage done to cm or anyone over the campaign part..

Really unexpected, if you look again at the Twitter used by: @ HarHarHar9965 is also used by: @Gimmelfarb, really ironic.

Connect:

5. Gimmelfarb (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131427)

Post by: HarHarHar9965 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323615.msg3466721#msg3466721)
https://archive.is/wip/jJSOJ

I don't understand the point of arguing against this concept except for the sake of intellectual exercise; nor do I see a benefit in making assumptions about DarkStar's job, as he has more experience in the occupation than any of us. But to each their own.

I was directly asked for my opinion on this thread by another DT1 member, so I gave it..

1vc8KaBa8mAuoaiJXt9QVY9mg8PucJKmj - scarsbergholden  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131131)(proof (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323615.msg3466624#msg3466624))

But.. Do you think that cm didn’t get the quality advertising they paid for because of this?
I think they still probably did, and it wouldn’t be a problem other than their specific rule to not allow alt accounts..
He is obviously a high quality poster to have achieved what he has..

So your opinion is that breaking the rules isn't really breaking the rules so long as you perceive ChipMixer still benefits from the poster wearing their signature? Otherwise, I don't understand what it is you are saying. He clearly broke a rule, and you're saying it's not "cheating." Why do you want to give this person a pass?

What do you mean give him a pass?

I personally don’t think bending the rules of a signature campaign is all that big of a deal..
...
I’m failing to see any financial damage done to cm or anyone over the campaign part..

I have made similar arguments in the past. As long as they are not talking to eachother, CM received advertising for xx posts, and paid for xx posts. The post quality was good enough that he was accepted into the campaign over other applicants, and was not removed when other applicants applied. 

I would see the 50 post limit as a means to control the budget.

I would be curious if DS would be open to allowing someone in the CM campaign to apply for one of the open spots with the account he is already participating with, so that he could potentailly be paid for 100 posts/week as opposed to 50 posts per week.

1. We will pay a maximum of 50 posts every week.

The Cryptios (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138349.0) people have IP-access too.

Cryptios's main purpose is recovering accounts, but they can also do minor patroller-type things. They are neither admins nor global moderators. They have access to IP/security logs (not PMs), but each of their accesses to private info are logged and per-day-limited; even if their access was compromised, the damage would be limited.

If you have to compare this to a job, compare it to a high-paying job that expects employees to do unpaid overtime once in a while. Pretending to be someone else to get those hours paid is fraud.

End my suffering and ban me now if I'm wrong about this LOL.

If you have to compare this to a job,

I have made similar arguments in the past. As long as they are not talking to eachother, CM received advertising for xx posts, and paid for xx posts.

I would see the 50 post limit as a means to control the budget.

I would be curious if DS would be open to allowing someone in the CM campaign to apply for one of the open spots with the account he is already participating with, so that he could potentailly be paid for 100 posts/week as opposed to 50 posts per week.

Where do you think he really stands now?

The post quality was good enough that he was accepted into the campaign over other applicants, and was not removed when other applicants applied. 

It seems that timeloard believes one of the accounts is a farmed account connected to a different farm. IDK if the accounts are still “connected” to the same person as the connection is from several years ago. My guess is that all the accounts in the OP were likely available for sale at one point, if not actually sold.

Another good example is this one. This guy said, "as they say", so I wondered who does he mean by "they" because I've never heard the expression said that way before. It turns out it was himself.

He has to be intelligent for writing so much posts everyday in same campaign with 3 accounts and from bitcoin he earned this is probably his full time job, and playing poker with himself figmentofmyass vs manchester93 it's a winwin situation for him until he lose it all :D

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

Wonder if they just have a bunch of cheap chromebooks that they use to keep everything separated.

I personally don’t think bending the rules of a signature campaign is all that big of a deal..
I think entering multiple alts in a free contest is much more “cheating” than breaking a sig campaign rule..
In fact I’m not even sure “cheating” the campaign is the correct word to use if he did in fact create all of that quality content and therefore quality advertising which probably had zero effect on the value of advertising he was paid to provide..

Only theymos and Cyrus have access to IP logs, not the moderators. I would also be very surprised if it turned out they were arbitrarily looking up user's IP logs just for the fun of it without some prior suspicion or indication.

It’s just more sensational because it’s chipmixer...

~snip~

I think this problem goes a little deeper than that.

I think this attitude is disrespectful towards the other members of the community .

Some of us, like nuthilda for example, are working hard to make good quality posts every week to get a slot in a sig campaign (to make money, ofc).

Then a guy uses 9 slots, breaking ethical rules. It is fair enough that the other members of the community dislike that attitude, as we were all damaged.

While he has making 0.075 btc per week in CM, 2 people could be making 0.0375, which is what CM would like to pay for.

2 people will certainly make a better post quality, in more boards, than 1.

@squatter seems to have a message for you, @nutildah.

squatter has not been online since 27 January (at least he wasn't when you made that screenshot) and nutildah created this thread on 1 February. squatter must have been talking about something else. ;D This entire thread gave me an idea and I will soon put it on paper.

squatter has not been online since 27 January (at least he wasn't when you made that screenshot) and nutildah created this thread on 1 February. squatter must have been talking about something else. ;D This entire thread gave me an idea and I will soon put it on paper.

"as they say" is a pretty common turn of phrase. It's just being rhetorical.

gentlemand https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1298899162

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155345

Stopped posting and logging in just after he was removed from the campaign, and hasn't returned since. TBH, I wouldn't be surprised if he had more accounts.

Nevertheless, I would like to hear from him the reasons why they decided to blatantly ignore any basic rule. I think we at least deserve this.

According to @ddmrddmr Merit Dashboard, I credited 75 merits to exstasie, 24 to figmentofmyass and 6 to squatter. I deeply regret those.

I'm now put off by all sig campaigns if the people running it can't figure out who's blatantly cheating, ffs... ::)

Remember Quickseller accused Hhampuz of scamming, but then changed his username to PrimeNumber7 and completely fooled the campaign manager into thinking he was a different person?   Today it seems everyone is so desperate they throw all their ethics away.  :/

I'm pretty sure DarkStar_ won't allow that. This rule is very clear:
I've made more than the maximum number of posts in most weeks. I didn't get paid for any posts above that, which is fine.
If you have to compare this to a job, compare it to a high-paying job that expects employees to do unpaid overtime once in a while. Pretending to be someone else to get those hours paid is fraud.

He has different Twitter handles for each account. Could be a treasure trove of new alt connections.

Seems to be a free slot so I apply for that Smiley

Twitter account: https://twitter.com/CoinOfBits
Bitcoin Address: 1LHH1jNrnzoEWrrsJ8HNioSGMAmk2qHNMc
Recent Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=a78d07110ebed5881ba10665fcf43fa312ab3020f4beea51dea594c2a93c5fd7:0
Weekly Bonus: Yes

Thank you! Smiley

I was not aware the LuckyBit offered this. The first two posts are a bit confusing but I apply for BADASS:

Posts: 508
BTC address: 1LHH1jNrnzoEWrrsJ8HNioSGMAmk2qHNMc

I will of course change avatar if accepted.

If you often make many more than the 50 post maximum, and there is an open spot, I don't see why DS would not be willing to give you a second spot, so that you would be eligible for payment from 100 posts/week, provided the additional 50 posts you make each week have been consistently better than other applicants who were applying for open spots.

You really are not kidding. The amount of people I've seen toss their morals to the wind for $$ makes me sorta ill lately. :P

It is the Internet after all, they know that they wouldn't suffer the repercussions so they can easily throw their morals away.

If what nutildah is true, I find this rule-breaking behaviour disrespectful to a long series of actors: firstly, other fellow CM sig campaign participant, @Darkstar_ and even Chipmixer themselves, who directly affected by this bad behaviour. Be in mind that those users were credited with almost 10 BTC during the whole campaign.

According to @ddmrddmr Merit Dashboard, I credited 75 merits to exstasie, 24 to figmentofmyass and 6 to squatter. I deeply regret those.

If you often make many more than the 50 post maximum, and there is an open spot, I don't see why DS would not be willing to give you a second spot, so that you would be eligible for payment from 100 posts/week

The thing is that when Loycev makes 50+x posts, those x posts will most likely be on the same boards and topic he already posted that week.

Almost everyone are here for the money.

The signature benefits were supposed to be some beer money

Why regret if the posts you merited are useful/helpful to other member?

Why regret merits sent to presumably good posts? This is a non-issue unless you knew that these are cheating accounts (and arguably even then; cheaters can make good posts too except they tend not to do so without getting paid).

Edit - full disclaimer: I sent tons of merits to those accounts, some possibly after I had reasonable suspicions. Not going to apologize.

Almost everyone are here for the money. If the signature campaigns and the bounties are gone for lets say a year, you'll see the real face of many that pretend they care about the forum. The signature benefits were supposed to be some beer money for the time people spent and enjoy here but the greed has turn this into a business.
 

The thing is that when Loycev makes 50+x posts, those x posts will most likely be on the same boards and topic he already posted that week.

If you often make many more than the 50 post maximum, and there is an open spot, I don't see why DS would not be willing to give you a second spot, so that you would be eligible for payment from 100 posts/week, provided the additional 50 posts you make each week have been consistently better than other applicants who were applying for open spots.

For clarity, while I do think it should be okay for someone to enroll alts in a signature campaign, I also believe this should either be disclosed (at least privately to the campaign manager), or for there to not be a rule prohibiting this. Enrolling two accounts owned by one person is not something that should be done if the campaign manager is not aware, or if there is a rule prohibiting this.

True. I've only been Merited on 41 boards :P

I admit I'm not here for the girls :D

Remember Quickseller accused Hhampuz of scamming, but then changed his username to PrimeNumber7 and completely fooled the campaign manager into thinking he was a different person?   Today it seems everyone is so desperate they throw all their ethics away.  :/

You really are not kidding. The amount of people I've seen toss their morals to the wind for $$ makes me sorta ill lately. :P

I admit I'm not here for the girls :D

I'd be continuously drunk if I spend all signature earnings on beer.

Do you guys hope he stops posting on all of his accounts and goes away forever, or do you think he is still a somewhat valuable member of the community even though he gamed the system to make more coin?

Would an admission and apology from him help any?
Where do you think he really stands now?

Also wonder if mods knew this by IP the entire time and kept their mouths shut..

Against hop hopen, I hope he comes back and uses this anonymity to come clean with the story of how he feels about doing this  and shares his thought process about the "ethics" of it all.

This is important to know. It'll be great if the mods can clarify this.. Whether they actually scrutinize IP logs for wrongdoing?? The least the mods can do is look at the IP logs of those accounts and see for themselves whether it was possible to identify them? This would probably bring some form of closure to those who feel cheated that the most aspirational Sig campaign on the forum was exploited for so long.

Would it matter to most if he really needed the money or it was his only source of income? Doubt it.

To say it was his only source of income and he needed the money, so he can cheat and the rest of the forum must be understanding is dangerous. There are people in Brazil who tries to justify robbery with the same argument.

What about the people who are legit trying to get one spot, and also need the money and it is their only source of income? I think ethics should always come first.

It is not a crime what he did. But it damaged other users, damaged CM and the campaign manager.

And it is a hell lot of money. He received probably around 2-5 BTC... We are talking about hundred thousand dollars

And it is a hell lot of money. He received probably around 2-5 BTC... We are talking about hundred thousand dollars

Way more than '2-5 BTC'. Remember, he tended to make close to 50 posts per week for three years, on two, sometimes three of his accounts.

figmentofmyass	3.693
exstasie	3.857
squatter	2.01

According to my back of the envelope computations:


For a total of 9.56 BTC.
I don't care if it is too much of too low if those btcs came from exchange hacks or not.
This is money they stole from other people who didn't get into the campaign simply because they broke the rules.

And it sounds even more ludicrous to claim other uninvolved third parties were somehow 'victimized' because of FomA 'hogging' campaign slots when it's an affair entirely between ChipMixer represented by DarkStar_ and whoever he accepts.

Are you really comparing using alts to go around campaign rules to a violent crime?

It is this kind of argument that makes the argument in favor of saying figmentofmyass was wrong to lose credibility.

figmentofmyass lied about his alts when he enrolled his alts in the CM campaign, and that is wrong. He did not steal money from anyone, and he certainly did not commit violence against anyone. He provided a service, and received payment for said service.

Instead of making extremist viewpoints, anyone who is upset about figmentofmyass should be honest about what he did, and the extent as to how much damage he caused.

According to my back of the envelope computations:


For a total of 9.56 BTC.
I don't care if it is too much of too low if those btcs came from exchange hacks or not.
This is money they stole from other people who didn't get into the campaign simply because they broke the rules.

I doubt whatever he says will change anything so it's probably futile offering explanations or excuses.

Would it matter to most if he really needed the money or it was his only source of income? Doubt it.

Only admins have access to IPs and having multiple accounts isn't against the rules nor would they care about what campaigns they were on so it's not something they would look into and certainly wouldn't share that info.

--snip--
And it sounds even more ludicrous to claim other uninvolved third parties were somehow 'victimized' because of FomA 'hogging' campaign slots when it's an affair entirely between ChipMixer represented by DarkStar_ and whoever he accepts.

That is just the amount of known BTC he made from the Chipmixer campaign but what about the all the other known and other unknown/undiscoverd accounts that were used in other signature campaigns? The true extent of his manipulation may never be known though connected accounts might be discovered from time to time.

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Forum Username: Wipeout2097
Forum Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=140481
Telegram Username: @MillionaireMindsetter
Participated Campaigns:Signature
ETH Wallet Address: 0xFAd4097dcFd2784206953542bd5Cc5c4663c6AB0

#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Nama Pengguna
Forum : angrynerd88 Link Profil Forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=215377
Jumlah Posting: 1137
Peringkat Forum: Sr.
Tanda Tangan Anggota dan avatar ditambahkan: Ya
ERC-20 Dompet: 0xFAd4097dcFd2784206953542bd5Cc5c4663c6AB0

Proof of authentication
Bitcointalk Username:mega
Telegram Username:@MillionaireMindsetter
Twitter Username:@SHOAIBNAZEERR
Retweet Link:https://twitter.com/ethaget/status/1182980077849440257

Proof of authentication
- Campaigns applied for:signature
- Bitcointalk username:angrynerd88
- Bitcointalk link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=215377;sa=showPosts
- Telegram link:@MillionaireMindsetter
- Facebook link:https://web.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100010431162950
- Twitter link:https://twitter.com/SHOAIBNAZEERR
- Instagram link:https://www.instagram.com/shoaibnazeermahar/
- Emirex ID:UID : ID5E0385D515

And I saw:@Wipeout2097 connected and using Eth Twitter, telegram, the same the three of them.
I am curious that they are active right now, if, @Wipeout2097 and @exstasie are Alt, that means: they are watching and seeing all this happening.
My belief is of course: @exstasie there is another Alt account that can be played here, if at any time he can make the same thing again in this forum in the campaign.

In order to confirm if two accounts are controlled by the same person, you need to rule out that any of the accounts had changed hands after the date of the connection.

Trust list for: figmentofmyass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=136484) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=136484)  +0 / =0 / -8) (979 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/136484.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/136484.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=figmentofmyass))

figmentofmyass's judgement is Trusted by:
1. TECSHARE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=15728) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=15728)  +38 / =7 / -2) (940 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/15728.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/15728.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TECSHARE))
2. peloso (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81995) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=81995)  +2 / =3 / -5) (179 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/81995.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/81995.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=peloso))
3. viviansidney (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=311082) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=311082) neutral) (43 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/311082.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/311082.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=viviansidney))
4. Removed Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632)  +5 / =0 / -0) (1235 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/366632.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/366632.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Royse777))
4. Removed johhnyUA (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=623643) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=623643)  +0 / =1 / -3) (DT1 (-2) 879 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/623643.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/623643.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=johhnyUA))
4. Removed Vispilio (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=982288) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=982288)  +1 / =3 / -3) (1047 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/982288.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/982288.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Vispilio))
4. hacker1001101001 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1021758) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1021758) #  +3 / =3 / -4) (309 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1021758.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1021758.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=hacker1001101001))
5. xenon131 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1037701) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1037701)  +1 / =0 / -0) (687 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1037701.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1037701.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=xenon131))
6. Removed Steamtyme (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1112531) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1112531)  +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (3) 1823 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1112531.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1112531.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Steamtyme))
6. truth or dare (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2758665) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2758665)  +0 / =4 / -4) (15 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2758665.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2758665.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=truth or dare))

~figmentofmyass's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW malevolent (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=23092) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=23092)  +2 / =0 / -0) (508 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/23092.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/23092.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=malevolent))
2. Vod (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30747)  +32 / =1 / -1) (DT1! (16) 1875 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/30747.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/30747.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Vod))
3. ibminer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=84866) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=84866)  +3 / =0 / -0) (919 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/84866.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/84866.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=ibminer))
4. Lauda (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=101872)  +38 / =17 / -6) (1871 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/101872.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/101872.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Lauda))
5. Timelord2067 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=131361)  +9 / =7 / -1) (DT1 (-9) 574 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/131361.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/131361.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Timelord2067))
6. mindrust (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=176777) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=176777) neutral) (DT1 (-1) 1121 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/176777.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/176777.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=mindrust))
7. NEW NeuroticFish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=257071) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257071) neutral) (920 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/257071.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/257071.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=NeuroticFish))
8. NEW DaveF (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300014) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=300014)  +26 / =1 / -0) (1193 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/300014.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/300014.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DaveF))
9. nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618)  +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3322 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=nutildah))
10. NEW ranochigo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=334898)  +10 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/334898.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/334898.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=ranochigo))
11. NEW yahoo62278 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=355846)  +25 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 1577 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/355846.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/355846.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=yahoo62278))
12. NEW Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632)  +5 / =0 / -0) (1235 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/366632.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/366632.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Royse777))
13. Vadi2323 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=399366) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=399366)  +1 / =3 / -1) (173 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/399366.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/399366.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Vadi2323))
14. kken01 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=415400) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=415400) neutral) (9 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/415400.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/415400.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=kken01))
15. NEW DarkStar_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=507936)  +54 / =1 / -0) (1520 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/507936.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/507936.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DarkStar_))
16. NEW TryNinja (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557798) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=557798) neutral) (DT1! (6) 2621 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/557798.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/557798.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TryNinja))
17. marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=787736)  +15 / =0 / -0) (1746 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/787736.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/787736.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=marlboroza))
18. NEW crwth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=914465) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=914465)  +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 706 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/914465.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/914465.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=crwth))
19. nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=976210) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=976210)  +5 / =4 / -1) (DT1 (-6) 2131 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/976210.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/976210.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=nullius))
20. JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855)  +11 / =0 / -0) (825 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1016855.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1016855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=JollyGood))
21. NEW El duderino_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1067333)  +23 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4735 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1067333.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1067333.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=El duderino_))
22. NEW amishmanish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107844) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1107844)  +1 / =0 / -0) (668 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1107844.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1107844.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=amishmanish))
23. NEW icopress (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137579) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1137579)  +5 / =0 / -0) (515 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1137579.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1137579.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=icopress))
24. NEW rhomelmabini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1255873) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1255873) neutral) (432 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1255873.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1255873.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=rhomelmabini))
25. NEW Maus0728 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1289002)  +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 917 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1289002.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1289002.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Maus0728))
26. NEW TheBeardedBaby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1291828)  +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2373 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1291828.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1291828.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TheBeardedBaby))
27. dkbit98 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1410401) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1410401)  +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1485 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1410401.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1410401.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=dkbit98))
28. NEW bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1554927) neutral) (2231 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1554927.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1554927.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=bitmover))
29. NEW fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1852120)  +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 4921 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1852120.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1852120.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=fillippone))
30. TalkStar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2136362) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2136362)  +12 / =0 / -0) (691 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2136362.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2136362.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TalkStar))
31. efialtis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2597426) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2597426)  +16 / =1 / -0) (1167 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2597426.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2597426.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=efialtis))
32. NEW zasad@ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2654005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2654005)  +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2144 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2654005.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2654005.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=zasad@))
33. NEW Rikafip (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2658890) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2658890)  +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1772 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2658890.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2658890.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Rikafip))
34. NEW FatFork (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2738899) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2738899)  +2 / =0 / -0) (312 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2738899.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2738899.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=FatFork))

Trust list for: exstasie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=154539) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154539)  +0 / =0 / -6) (1006 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/154539.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/154539.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=exstasie))

exstasie's judgement is Trusted by:
1. El duderino_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1067333)  +23 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4735 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1067333.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1067333.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=El duderino_))
2. dragonvslinux (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1170966) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1170966)  +2 / =1 / -2) (560 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1170966.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1170966.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=dragonvslinux))

~exstasie's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Timelord2067 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131361) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=131361)  +9 / =7 / -1) (DT1 (-9) 574 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/131361.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/131361.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Timelord2067))
2. NEW NeuroticFish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=257071) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257071) neutral) (920 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/257071.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/257071.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=NeuroticFish))
3. NEW DaveF (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300014) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=300014)  +26 / =1 / -0) (1193 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/300014.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/300014.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DaveF))
4. nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618)  +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3322 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=nutildah))
5. NEW ranochigo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=334898)  +10 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/334898.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/334898.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=ranochigo))
6. NEW yahoo62278 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=355846)  +25 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 1577 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/355846.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/355846.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=yahoo62278))
7. NEW Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632)  +5 / =0 / -0) (1235 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/366632.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/366632.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Royse777))
8. NEW DarkStar_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=507936)  +54 / =1 / -0) (1520 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/507936.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/507936.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DarkStar_))
9. NEW TryNinja (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557798) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=557798) neutral) (DT1! (6) 2621 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/557798.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/557798.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TryNinja))
10. marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=787736)  +15 / =0 / -0) (1746 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/787736.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/787736.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=marlboroza))
11. NEW crwth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=914465) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=914465)  +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 706 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/914465.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/914465.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=crwth))
12. NEW JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855)  +11 / =0 / -0) (825 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1016855.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1016855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=JollyGood))
13. NEW amishmanish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107844) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1107844)  +1 / =0 / -0) (668 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1107844.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1107844.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=amishmanish))
14. NEW icopress (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137579) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1137579)  +5 / =0 / -0) (515 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1137579.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1137579.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=icopress))
15. NEW rhomelmabini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1255873) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1255873) neutral) (432 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1255873.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1255873.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=rhomelmabini))
16. NEW Maus0728 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1289002)  +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 917 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1289002.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1289002.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Maus0728))
17. NEW TheBeardedBaby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1291828)  +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2373 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1291828.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1291828.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TheBeardedBaby))
18. NEW dkbit98 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1410401) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1410401)  +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1485 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1410401.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1410401.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=dkbit98))
19. NEW bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1554927) neutral) (2231 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1554927.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1554927.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=bitmover))
20. NEW fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1852120)  +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 4921 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1852120.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1852120.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=fillippone))
21. NEW zasad@ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2654005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2654005)  +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2144 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2654005.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2654005.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=zasad@))
22. NEW Rikafip (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2658890) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2658890)  +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1772 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2658890.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2658890.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Rikafip))

Trust list for: squatter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162680) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=162680)  +0 / =0 / -5) (683 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/162680.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/162680.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=squatter))

squatter's judgement is Trusted by:
1. bamb (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=339386) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=339386)  +0 / =0 / -2) (1 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/339386.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/339386.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=bamb))
2. endlasuresh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=906005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=906005)  +0 / =0 / -3) (3 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/906005.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/906005.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=endlasuresh))
3. Bazinga442 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1246188) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1246188)  +0 / =0 / -7) (24 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1246188.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1246188.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Bazinga442))
4. chickinini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1575704) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1575704)  +0 / =0 / -3) (11 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1575704.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1575704.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=chickinini))
5. cryptorgasm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1575750) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1575750)  +0 / =0 / -3) (4 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1575750.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1575750.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=cryptorgasm))
6. Pablojob (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586457) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1586457)  +0 / =0 / -4) (10 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1586457.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1586457.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Pablojob))
7. PiningGarcia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586551) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1586551)  +0 / =0 / -4) (10 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1586551.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1586551.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=PiningGarcia))
8. PingGermoco (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586585) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1586585)  +0 / =0 / -4) (10 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1586585.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1586585.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=PingGermoco))
9. cryptopov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1609508) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1609508)  +0 / =0 / -3) (4 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1609508.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1609508.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=cryptopov))
10. poypototoy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1658865) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1658865)  +0 / =0 / -3) (10 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1658865.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1658865.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=poypototoy))
11. Zin-Zang (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1777865) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1777865)  +0 / =1 / -7) (11 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1777865.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1777865.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Zin-Zang))
12. H8bussesNbicycles (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2472107) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2472107)  +0 / =1 / -11) (10 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2472107.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2472107.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=H8bussesNbicycles))
13. ito-marketing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2535994) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2535994)  +0 / =0 / -3) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2535994.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=ito-marketing))
14. gwsukabokepjepang (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2536607) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2536607)  +0 / =0 / -10) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2536607.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=gwsukabokepjepang))
15. The-One-Above-All (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2580400) #  +0 / =0 / -16) (56 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2580400.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2580400.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=The-One-Above-All))
16. smartcontracts100 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2779504) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2779504)  +0 / =1 / -5) (5 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2779504.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2779504.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=smartcontracts100))

~squatter's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. KWH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=70535) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=70535)  +10 / =2 / -0) (45 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/70535.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/70535.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=KWH))
2. NEW NeuroticFish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=257071) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257071) neutral) (920 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/257071.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/257071.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=NeuroticFish))
3. NEW DaveF (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=300014) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=300014)  +26 / =1 / -0) (1193 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/300014.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/300014.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DaveF))
4. nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618)  +13 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 3322 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=nutildah))
5. NEW ranochigo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=334898) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=334898)  +10 / =0 / -0) (858 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/334898.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/334898.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=ranochigo))
6. NEW yahoo62278 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=355846)  +25 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (24) 1577 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/355846.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/355846.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=yahoo62278))
7. NEW Royse777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=366632) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632)  +5 / =0 / -0) (1235 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/366632.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/366632.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Royse777))
8. NEW DarkStar_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=507936)  +54 / =1 / -0) (1520 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/507936.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/507936.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=DarkStar_))
9. NEW TryNinja (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557798) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=557798) neutral) (DT1! (6) 2621 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/557798.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/557798.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TryNinja))
10. marlboroza (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=787736)  +15 / =0 / -0) (1746 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/787736.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/787736.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=marlboroza))
11. NEW crwth (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=914465) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=914465)  +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (6) 706 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/914465.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/914465.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=crwth))
12. NEW JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855)  +11 / =0 / -0) (825 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1016855.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1016855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=JollyGood))
13. NEW El duderino_ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1067333)  +23 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (10) 4735 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1067333.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1067333.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=El duderino_))
14. NEW amishmanish (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107844) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1107844)  +1 / =0 / -0) (668 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1107844.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1107844.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=amishmanish))
15. NEW icopress (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137579) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1137579)  +5 / =0 / -0) (515 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1137579.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1137579.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=icopress))
16. NEW rhomelmabini (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1255873) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1255873) neutral) (432 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1255873.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1255873.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=rhomelmabini))
17. NEW Maus0728 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1289002) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1289002)  +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 917 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1289002.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1289002.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Maus0728))
18. NEW TheBeardedBaby (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1291828)  +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 2373 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1291828.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1291828.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=TheBeardedBaby))
19. NEW dkbit98 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1410401) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1410401)  +12 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1485 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1410401.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1410401.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=dkbit98))
20. NEW bitmover (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1554927) neutral) (2231 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1554927.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1554927.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=bitmover))
21. NEW fillippone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1852120)  +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (16) 4921 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/1852120.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/1852120.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=fillippone))
22. NEW zasad@ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2654005) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2654005)  +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 2144 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2654005.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2654005.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=zasad@))
23. NEW Rikafip (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2658890) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2658890)  +7 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (8) 1772 Merit earned (https://loyce.club/Merit/history/2658890.html)) (Trust list (https://loyce.club/trust/2021-02-06_Sat_23.22h/2658890.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/Profile?p=Rikafip))

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102296.0).
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust (https://loyce.club/trust/).

One week of Trust list changes:

Maybe you saw it and didn't think much of it.

Trust list for: figmentofmyass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=136484) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=136484) neutral) (653 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/136484.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-29_Sat_06.37h/136484.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=figmentofmyass)) (created 2020-02-29_Sat_06.37h)

figmentofmyass's judgement is Trusted by:
3. Removed squatter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162680) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=162680) neutral) (593 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/162680.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-29_Sat_06.37h/162680.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=squatter))

Trust list for: squatter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=162680) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=162680) neutral) (560 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/162680.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-22_Sat_06.05h/162680.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=squatter)) (created 2020-02-22_Sat_06.05h)

squatter Trusts these users' judgement:
10. NEW figmentofmyass (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=136484) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=136484) neutral) (643 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/136484.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-22_Sat_06.05h/136484.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=figmentofmyass))

I won't lie but i loved conversations with exstasie/figmentofmyass/squatter. They were extremely useful and helpful users of bitcointalk.

The week before these exclusions they had some interaction in The Objective Standards Guild - Testimonium Libertatem Iustitia (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53892621#msg53892621).

If marlboroza suspected them to be alts, why didn't he mention it?

~snip~

Actually, my first interaction with foma happened in 2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3617512.msg36888918#msg36888918)., seems he was pissed at me for unknown reason. Maybe I exposed and tagged some of his alts back then? Makes me wonder... Also, don't forget to read foma's replies in PM7 topic (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219253.0) :D

If marlboroza suspected them to be alts, why didn't he mention it?

What would you have expected him do?

I'm not sure.

That's a bit like calling Lance Armstrong's competitors "uninvolved third parties" :). If DarkStar_ knew that they were alts he wouldn't have accepted them so deception resulted in someone losing out.

If I created a thread giving $100 to first 10 users who reply, and stipulated that no alts are allowed, someone cheating with 3 accounts would be essentially stealing from users who reply #11 and #12. This FOMA situation is not much different.

If I created a thread giving $100 to first 10 users who reply, and stipulated that no alts are allowed, someone cheating with 3 accounts would be essentially stealing from users who reply #11 and #12. This FOMA situation is not much different.

My "hope" is basically to get a peek into the minds of this fraudster and not really about him asking for an apology. He is anonymous. He could easily write a short memoir and it'll be a hit.

It doesn't sound ludicrous at all. Ass broke campaign rules to hog the spots which could as well have gone to someone else. Considering that 100+ applicants apply for the spots and only 1-2 get in, it is unfair to those who could have been selected.

Then there is the whole issue of decency and conduct. As Staff, it is understood that you cannot make enforceable "rules" about conduct and cannot define decency.  This is subjective but its importance shouldn't be diluted, least of all by staff; by refusing to take a stand on the ethical debate over such actions.

I think the lesson to be drawn from this is that decentralized and anonymous systems will never really be able to implement even a semblance of fair business practices. There will always be the need for a way to track participant actions that affect the business. While this forum and bitcoiners proselytize about the benefits of "decentralization", they accept wrongdoing, fraud and plain corruption as "sleight of hand". We all accept this "He did it because he could, lets forget about it" mentality over such things. This is one of the biggest hurdles for the concept of decentralization to truly become useful. Because if you are going to be vulnerable to the same scheming and collusion, why really bother to change the present system. Lets just keep morals, ethics aside and everybody go mooooooon.

I absolutely don't condone deception, but as far as scamming and defrauding goes, this is all very tame by bitcointalk or cryptocurrency-sphere standards.

It doesn't at all compare to, for example, cheating at no-fee raffles, and the main reason people are so angry is because of the amount of money involved.

Getting accepted into a campaign is not akin to winning a no-fee raffle but conditional on being the most suitable forum member DarkStar_ is looking for. Other people applied, and yet FomA's alts were chosen over them, clearly indicating who was a better fit for the campaign.

It’s absolutely 100% fair free market anarchy..
~
In a decentralized world you have to think of what is possible without bounds of morality, and expect whatever to happen accordingly..
Keep your eyes out for scammers and others to take advantage of every and any opportunity..
~
This is crypto.. Stop thinking in a world of rules and control and start thinking in a world where all possibilities and opportunities will be taken advantage of by someone, and protect yourself accordingly..

Just think.. In all likelihood CM is an NSA honeypot anyway, lol..

Given the number of applicants and no lack of good ones, DarkStar_ is probably throwing a dart at the shortlist, but that's not the point. If FOMA didn't break the rules then someone else would have taken his place and earned that money. Therefore FOMA breaking the rules did negatively affect whoever was next on DS's shortlist, even we accept the rationalization that FOMA didn't steal from DS/CM. The fact that we can't name the affected users in this situation doesn't mean they don't exist.

It wasn't on me to mention it, besides, there wasn't solid proof of connection.

And NO nutildah I’m not saying that it’s perfectly OK that he broke the campaign rules.. It is an untrustworthy action surely..

But quite “tame”, and not as bad as the cheating the giveaways actions..

People are pissy because it’s chipmixer..
They think the world should be “fair” or something..

Should be putting a neutral on the project representatives, ANN posters, and managers..
“Bounties full of alt accounts, poor advertising practices” -warn investors..
“Manager repeatedly hires multiple alt accounts” - warn projects of poor managers..

Make the project and managers feel some pain over it..

For all we know the managers accounts and project rep accounts are all alts too..

Also, since potentially affected users lost against FomA in the competition to be admitted, them being accepted would technically mean CM would be paying for posts of inferior quality to those of FomA. :P

It sounded like you thought bounty managers that hire alts should be actively punished while higher paying sig campaign managers should look the other way when it comes to rulebreakers, but you've since clarified that's not what you believe. I think that's why I found some of your input to be problematic, LOL. First time I've ever used that word.

He did not steal money from anyone, and he certainly did not commit violence against anyone. He provided a service, and received payment for said service.

It’s absolutely 100% fair free market anarchy..
Every one of us had the same opportunity to enroll 3 or even 10 alts into CM just as he did..
Yeah he broke the rules, but he got away with it, and made a killing..

In a decentralized world you have to think of what is possible without bounds of morality, and expect whatever to happen accordingly..
Keep your eyes out for scammers and others to take advantage of every and any opportunity..

What does the link proof and how can that post proof that you are not alt of anyone? I'm not saying you are alt of anyone; since you linked this, I got curious how this post is relevant to proof that you are not anyone's alt.

At least y'all can be sure that I'm no-one's alt. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.msg54328378#msg54328378)

132zvKqMn3Fy45ddDyhFb8SjksDPvvUyiQ - InwardContour (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131697) (proof (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323615.msg3466792#msg3466792)) (still active)

- Campaigns applied for: Signature
    - Bitcointalk username: InwardContour
    - Bitcointalk link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131697
    - Telegram username : @inwardman
    - Wallet address: 0x141E479b5F79302fdd8176CBC03165bC6c54382A

#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
- Campaigns applied for: Signature Campaign
    - Bitcointalk username: dataispower
    - Bitcointalk link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=381987
    - Telegram handle: @dataispower1
    - Wallet address: 0x8c6CA8ADcd305e2e0052939d87dB405fE5CBf5D9

#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
- Campaigns applied for: Article
    - Bitcointalk username: deodivine1
    - Bitcointalk link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1390292
    - Telegram handle : @cryptolens
    - Wallet address: 0x6761ECA7904Eb61D33a5bea1eaF25B2805Cc0829

What does the link proof and how can that post proof that you are not alt of anyone? I'm not saying you are alt of anyone; since you linked this, I got curious how this post is relevant to proof that you are not anyone's alt.

~snip~

Going by this guy's writing style, I'm pretty sure this account still belongs to FOMA.

I had a few extra minutes this morning so I found an ETH address he posted:

~snip~

The two transactions happened mere minutes apart and are not purchases -- it's a single person consolidating wallets. So on top of everything else, he's also been cheating in bounties, which isn't really surprising.

Interestingly, lovesmayfamilis had connected deodivine1 to other accounts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199522) in 2019.

I think the lesson to be drawn from this is that decentralized and anonymous systems will never really be able to implement even a semblance of fair business practices. There will always be the need for a way to track participant actions that affect the business. While this forum and bitcoiners proselytize about the benefits of "decentralization", they accept wrongdoing, fraud and plain corruption as "sleight of hand". We all accept this "He did it because he could, lets forget about it" mentality over such things. This is one of the biggest hurdles for the concept of decentralization to truly become useful. Because if you are going to be vulnerable to the same scheming and collusion, why really bother to change the present system. Lets just keep morals, ethics aside and everybody go mooooooon.

I think this would be a very good subject for another topic! In a way I really like what you said here, but at the same time I totally disagree. From what I've seen, I think theymos would completely agree with you point of view here.

Does it make any of you that never got into the CM campaign angry that he was 3X a better poster than you? Lol..
Because that’s basically what it boils down to..

He stole money from other potential participants, and cheated the company that is requesting the service (as they stated that they didn't want to enrol alts). Just because you can't name them, doesn't mean they don't exist, like suchmoon said. He might have stole 2 BTC from you. How would you feel about that?

For some reason my eyes glossed over this the first time. This is wrong at every level. Nobody's gonna stop to tell him that all 3 accounts enrolled before the great 2017 bull run? Because that is what initially attracted attention to the CM campaign in the first place. It was only after that when competition got much stiffer. Unsurprisingly, there's still a lot of accounts grandfathered in from that era who, in my opinion, probably wouldn't make the cut today if applying for the first time.

Sorry eddie but I'm not going to stop busting account farms over fear of having my posting ability judged by you.

I’ve been speaking generally.. Not sure why your so focused on me here..

It seems that timelord believes one of the accounts is a farmed account connected to a different farm. IDK if the accounts are still “connected” to the same person as the connection is from several years ago. My guess is that all the accounts in the OP were likely available for sale at one point, if not actually sold.

2012-11-21, 06:21:20 Date Registered: 	MAbtc

2013-07-09, 18:43:52 Date Registered: 	illyiller
2013-07-09, 18:49:13 Date Registered: 	figmentofmyass

2013-10-28, 00:34:01 Date Registered: 	exstasie

2013-11-18, 04:37:55 Date Registered: 	squatter
2013-11-18, 06:41:48 Date Registered: 	marky89

2014-07-27, 20:08:36 Date Registered: 	manchester93
2014-07-27, 20:20:46 Date Registered: 	romani245
2014-07-27, 20:31:48 Date Registered: 	illinest

2019-11-09, 08:23:27 Last Active: 	marky89

2020-01-15, 05:50:16  Last Active: 	MAbtc

2020-02-19, 17:55:53 Last Active: 	romani245

2021-02-02, 08:33:27 Last Active: 	exstasie

2020-03-05, 07:53:32 Last Active: 	manchester93
2020-03-05, 07:53:48 Last Active: 	illinest

2021-01-19, 20:49:35 Last Active: 	illyiller

2021-01-27, 10:33:45 Last Active: 	squatter
2021-01-30, 03:01:58 Last Active: 	figmentofmyass

Timelord2067   2017-01-16    Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17520054#msg17520054)   This is a farmed UID to pump and bump (i.e. self vouching) piratcoin u=157009

Accounts Connected: Kyle91 -2: -1 / +0, drpepperyummy, ltiv, beegatewood, exstasie, mert1337, Xtrem999, Leezil, BioBTC, Jochen, piratcoin, fildza, Wipeout2097, dabest1, Fuckbuddies

2011-05-30, 19:00:03 Date Registered: 	dabest1

2012-07-13, 18:56:47 Date Registered: 	Fuckbuddies

2013-07-11, 20:33:34Date Registered: 	fildza

2013-07-26, 11:21:21 Date Registered: 	Wipeout2097

2013-08-10, 12:58:55 Date Registered: 	Kyle91

2013-09-13, 02:37:29 Date Registered: 	drpepperyummy

2013-09-24, 01:15:27 Date Registered: 	 ltiv

2013-10-26, 23:51:06 Date Registered: 	beegatewood
2013-10-28, 00:34:01 Date Registered: 	exstasie
2013-10-29, 01:01:20 Date Registered: 	mert1337
2013-10-29, 05:35:27 Date Registered: 	Xtrem999
2013-10-30, 19:49:21 Date Registered: 	Leezil
2013-10-31, 15:04:09Date Registered: 	BioBTC
2013-11-01, 11:50:23 Date Registered: 	Jochen

2013-11-10, 09:41:46 Last Active: 	Leezil

2013-12-09, 09:35:19 Last Active: 	drpepperyummy
2013-12-22, 21:46:24 Last Active: 	 ltiv

2015-01-10, 20:58:12 Last Active: 	Xtrem999

2016-12-26, 09:33:04Last Active: 	BioBTC

2018-03-26, 16:50:34 Last Active: 	mert1337

2018-04-09, 18:31:43 Last Active: 	dabest1
2018-04-10, 13:13:23 Last Active: 	fildza

2018-07-14, 20:16:54 Last Active: 	Fuckbuddies

2018-07-23, 03:07:15 Last Active: 	beegatewood

2018-11-06, 08:14:25 Last Active: 	Kyle91

2019-03-28, 23:43:19 Last Active: 	Jochen

2021-02-02, 08:33:27 Last Active: 	exstasie

2011-05-14, 05:49:48 Date Registered: 	yeponlyone

2013-05-19, 12:32:39 Date Registered: 	Marbit

2013-06-02, 19:04:11 Date Registered: 	mega

2013-06-21, 06:01:21 Date Registered: 	Argwai96
2013-06-21, 06:26:01 Date Registered: 	Gimmelfarb
2013-06-22, 03:14:36 Date Registered: 	AceWallen
2013-06-22, 03:22:06 Date Registered: 	HarHarHar9965

2014-01-09, 16:56:05 Date Registered: 	angrynerd88

2015-07-28, 02:34:38 Last Active: 	AceWallen

2017-11-30, 08:41:39 Last Active: 	Argwai96

2018-12-09, 22:07:12 Last Active: 	Marbit

2019-07-09, 18:05:47 Last Active: 	yeponlyone

2019-07-24, 06:46:27 Last Active: 	Gimmelfarb

2020-02-26, 15:54:36 Last Active: 	HarHarHar9965

Credits should also be given to Timelord2067 who first found some connection with his accounts back in 2017 related to some piratcoin pump and dump:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17520054#msg17520054

I wouldn't trust timelord's ratings especially ones from so long ago as 2017. He used to have a bizarre habit of tying people together using twisted logic that only made sense to him. My memory is hazy but I'm pretty sure figmentofmyass was well known to belong to an account farmer or was sold at one point. That name definitely sticks out.

I believe most of what @quickseller has said in this thread is spin to protect past clients.

Who knows, maybe he has more still enrolled in CM.

Well... Well... Well...

So the DT1 Troll figmentofmyass who DT distrusted me and spent many months convincing other DT1 Trolls that my investigations into alts was wild hysteria has been proven to be in actual fact an alt scammer him/herself scamming from the largest SigCamp.

I thought of that possibility too. It would be interesting (but painstaking) to cross-check all addresses ever posted by all participants.

This brings up a question, is there someone who is willing to spend some BTC for an extended period just to frame someone?

from the OP's list of those they identified this simple list of the UID's involved shows their various creation dates / last active dates:

---

---

Were @darkstar_ to compile a list (indeed *any* Campaign Manager) something like that would stand out like a sore thumb.

Stop thinking in a world of rules and control and start thinking in a world where all possibilities and opportunities will be taken advantage of by someone, and protect yourself accordingly..

I absolutely don't condone deception, but as far as scamming and defrauding goes, this is all very tame by bitcointalk or cryptocurrency-sphere standards.

my tribute to this great legend:

So, here are the UID's I said are alts ways back in 2017:

...
2013-10-26, 23:51:06 Date Registered:    beegatewood
2013-10-28, 00:34:01 Date Registered:    exstasie
2013-10-29, 01:01:20 Date Registered:    mert1337
2013-10-29, 05:35:27 Date Registered:    Xtrem999
2013-10-30, 12:33:31 Date Registered:    gentlemand
2013-10-30, 19:49:21 Date Registered:    Leezil
2013-10-31, 15:04:09Date Registered:    BioBTC
2013-11-01, 11:50:23 Date Registered:    Jochen
...

...
In this day and age forums are on their way out unless already established. People do Facebook groups and IM stuff like Telegram or Discord. I think it's an unfortunate development as all that info effectively vapourises.
...

imagine if someone wants to connect your account to an alt, they can easily send you funds from the address they use for another signature campain

Anyway, good work nutildah! ;D

This brings up a question, is there someone who is willing to spend some BTC for an extended period just to frame someone?

This brings up a question, is there someone who is willing to spend some BTC for an extended period just to frame someone?

Well it happened to me too, figmentofmyass also contacted DT members asking them to either remove me from their trust list or add me to their distrust list.

I did question why but the idea of sock-puppets or alt-accounts never really came to my mind. I now think I must given red trust to one of his alt-accounts and that must have struck a nerve therefore he tried his best to manipulate others against me.

For example:  At no point in my one prior post in this thread do I make any suggestion that any of the subsets are alts of any of the other subsets.  I even quoted the hypothesis' put forwards by others and compared the available data to answer their speculation, but made no confirmation statements concerning any of the UID's mentioned in this thread.

So, here are the UID's I said are alts ways back in 2017:

imagine if someone wants to connect your account to an alt, they can easily send you funds from the address they use for another signature campain, or send it to the address you send to
~
This brings up a question, is there someone who is willing to spend some BTC for an extended period just to frame someone?

If you REALLY REALLY pissed me off and for $30 week for 9 months (36 weeks) so a bit less then $1100 it might just be worth it. If I could really screw with you.
**But it would have to have done something really over the top for me to do that. Like ulta horrible, it's just not me or my thing. Others may feel differently.**

Enough shocks for this month, can you do that a month later?. ;D.

When you think about it, blockchain evidence is hard to deny even if someone tries to frame you, imagine if someone wants to connect your account to an alt, they can easily send you funds from the address they use for another signature campain, or send it to the address you send to, of course, I'd imagine another chipmixer participant won't attempt that unless they are willing to lose their spot in the process, but it all can be done "theoretically".

This brings up a question, is there someone who is willing to spend some BTC for an extended period just to frame someone?

I guess it would depend on the amount of BTC vs. the desire for revenge / screwing with people and their own economic situation.

If you REALLY REALLY pissed me off and for $30 week for 9 months (36 weeks) so a bit less then $1100 it might just be worth it. If I could really screw with you.
**But it would have to have done something really over the top for me to do that. Like ulta horrible, it's just not me or my thing. Others may feel differently.**

Here's where things start to get a little off the rails:


While doing this may yield interesting results further worth pursuing, it's a great way to get a lot of innocents caught up in the crossfire and suspecting people of being alts on this criteria alone is a bad idea.

Thanks for your good wishes @JollyGood , as sad as it sounds, unfortunately for the moment at least, we are stuck with DT1 Trolls who will attempt to undermine our work.

I know you're talking to me and not around me. So, let's address your point together:


I guess this doesn't mean what I thought it meant:


Regardless of how we interpret your mention of gentlemand, the fact that his account "registration date is spot on for these two clusters" has nothing to do with anything. By bringing it up here you are inferring that it does. I am telling you 100% it does not.

You undermine your own work with faulty conclusions and by the trust abuse you commit. Any 'good' work you do is invalidated when you use nonsense to tie other accounts together. You can't throw 50 darts at board and congratulate yourself when one of them manages to stick in whilst the rest fall to the floor.

Counter-hypothetical: what if FOMA didn't cheat and made 120 posts per week with one account providing extra free advertising to CM, who could then hire one or two other users with the same budget and get even more advertising. That's basically how it works with honest participants like LoyceV who often exceeds the 50 post count by a large margin.

Do you know what's even more ironic? I have always liked exstasie but I didn't really enjoy reading figmentofmyass's posts, it's "incredible" how one person may seem like a few, he indeed did a better job than "Kevin in the movie Split".

It seems counterintuitive to say you absolutely do not condone deceptive behavior, but then try to play down deceptive behaviors.

Do you believe a person willing to cheat on a signature campaign for money is not going to cheat on a no-fee raffle, if he believes he can't be caught?  What odds would you give for this happening?

So you're saying.... I have to do something really bad to get $1100 for free? I don't think that's how punishing someone works.

My only gripe with you is the post scraper that archives all my misspellings and grammar mistakes before I can edit them. ;-)

-Dave

So, if I spent $1100 to get you kicked out of the ChipMixer campaign that would not be "punishment"
If I started a bunch of alt accounts that I deliberately got banned and had funds could be tied to them also get tied to your addresses so you get banned from here that would not be punishment?

I'm not afraid at all of any accusations.

My only gripe with you is the post scraper that archives all my misspellings and grammar mistakes before I can edit them. ;-)

Your world sucks. :P
A world where only the most immoral and unethical people will thrive and dominate.. this is the world you want?

How are you going to "protect yourself accordingly" when all forms of possible protection are taken advantage of by someone, and aren't forms of protection at all anymore?  You'll either become them, or be owned by them.

I'm all about personal freedoms and independence.. i.e. governments, banks, etc.. should not have the type of power they have and should be limited on many fronts. However, no rules, no policies, no government at all... will not be a good thing.. not if you want to have a somewhat civil society or community.

What do you think CM does?
They launder money! They protect tax evaders, protect drug dealers, hitmen, you name it, the most immoral profitable thing you can imagine I’m sure chipmixer has protected them..
It’s what they do!!

Chipmixer got “scammed” a little tiny bit by some guy writing posts? Lol..
How do you feel about DPR getting scammed by redandwhite?
Live by the sword, die by the sword? No?


What happened here is FOMA didn’t use ChipMixer!!
CM is made for people just like FOMA..

Y’all just love CM because they are a stand up company with great principles?
These are their principles!! Anarchy! Lawlessness, enabling every sort of “criminal” you can imagine!!
What world do you think your in exactly?

about your comment, I think the following:

did the chipmixer owner create a mixer for thieves or created for anyone who wants more privacy? i'm not a chipmixer owner i can only assume that it created for anyone to have more privacy.

because if he know (have proof) that criminals are using his mixer to commit crimes this is dangerous and bad.

bad because sooner or later the police will knock on his door and from what I see the justice system is very cruel for this type of crime

I'm still trying to figure out if you guys just derive joy in giving red trust or there is something else. How am I connected to the strange accounts. Please check again

#PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION
Bitcointalk username : InwardContour
Bitcointalk profile : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=131697
Telegram username : @inwardcontour
ETH address : 0x4f9506cfCefC978cACA23C99f3f1Dacaa46900d2
...

I'm still trying to figure out if you guys just derive joy in giving red trust or there is something else. How am I connected to the strange accounts. Please check again

I'm still trying to figure out if you guys just derive joy in giving red trust or there is something else. How am I connected to the strange accounts. Please check again

I'm trying to figure out why scammers such as yourself have the gall to stand there and bald face challenge others in the face of compelling, and overwhelming evidence of your guilt.  Instead of Trolling or indeed scamming why don't you just stop.  You'll become a better person if you do.