Bitcoin Forum

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

it all depends on the company if the rules for exclusion were originally established or it will most likely not be counted .But there are popadajutsja methodically administrators and may include

From the ongoing discussion above concerning signature campaign, I think certain conditions are set which must be obeyed by bounty hunters,however giving of stakes to those could not meet up can be as the discretion of the manager.

Now a days all the bounty campaigns follow the same path.Very unfamiliar with the their tasks.Most of are reducing the allocation for the signature campaigns

I participated in the DCC network campaign and I got quite a few tokens. I think that the campaign signatures depend a lot on luck.

They should judge our post by quality and where we post this post.... Otherwise 15,9,8 post is just number............. They only see our quality of post and where we post the post...

It would be a great idea for bounty managers to be more considerate to participants that meet above 80% of the criteria, but if they choose to be less considerate we cannot complain because we agreed to the terms of the contract before proceeding with the campaign.

Signature bounties has been the best since this days in cryptocurrency, though I'm satisfied with the reward earnings, but it depends on bounty campaign program willingly

There are clear conditions that you must fulfill. If you take a signature, then you become acquainted with the rules and automatically agree with them. If you have not written the required number of posts, you will absolutely deservedly receive 0 Stakes

The worst is when threads get deleted and you lose posts at the last minute.  Now one has to make a few extra posts each week to satisfy the criteria in case posts get deleted.

By fighting the spam they actually create more spam.

You should understand that bounty campaign is the agreement between the token distributor and you as an interpreter. So if you make all the job you agree for, you get a salary. If not then you don't get it. It is clear, they are not giving money away, they pay for a job.

Depends on the manager.
Some do pay even with the lack of posts per week. But you cannot do that over and over again.
You must abide with rules and it is clear that there is a requirement to receive it.

We are advertiaers here. So it will be better if could spread it more and that is the use of post counts.

As per rules they will not be rewarded at all for that week. That is the most of the campaign managers follow when they are checking the stakes for the any campaign. Next to that some managers like yahoo partially pay the partcipants if they made the good number of posts and missing one or posts means.

Really wait for some months you will more signature campaign with the big payments soon. All the people will be enjoyed with it bro.

Yes! great comparison. If you agreed to certain conditions, be kind - follow them.  If managers will begin to consider the proportion of stakes for everyone on the number of posts, then soon he will be asked to consider the length of the posts. ;D

Your question really made me confused, like you are a child. If you wish to participate in a signature campaign you have to follow its rules, which written straight in the first post of the campaign, so, if you fill the weekly minimum you will get the payment, if not - you will not. In the case when you made more comments when it's necessary you will never give more than the weekly payment which discribed in rules. The only thing you may hope for is a bonus for being extra productive commentator of the week, but not every signature campaign gives that.
Another case is to be payed by each post, but again here there are minimums and maximums, which you should to follow to stay payed and not to become rolled out the campaign for shitposting.

First-off it's all about the rules if you read the rules and it's clear to you, if it says there that 10 post or 15 post it's exactly what you need to do, there's no exception right there! you need to be compliant with everything and the first thing that you need to remember is that you accepted the terms beforehand. So if you will not follow that exactly sorry but it's  not accepted.

Yeah I know that feel, I actually posted 10 posts for the week but unfortunately one of them deleted by moderator at the last day so I didn't receive my stake that week.  Because that was the rule, I can't complain.  I just posted more for the other weeks just in case.

not all signature bounty campaign gives satisfactory results. some of the campaign even gave a very mercenary is not satisfactory. but for those who are already working as a bounty hunter I guess the signature campaign is the bounty that give results that are quite satisfactory.

Jr member like me won't be satisfied of the payment because bounty allocation for jr member is very low. We just hope there are no much higher rank that would join the bounty so we could get a higher payment because of the staking scheme.

I do not have a problem with these rules. It you have more than enough posts for that week then you cannot carry that post for the next week since the posts are for weekly basis. It is up to you if you post more for assurance, but you cant blame the manager if you lack some during counting.

Bounty campaigns are agreements between distributor tokens and you as a translator. So if you make all the work you approve, you get a salary. If not then you don't get it. Obviously, they don't give money, they pay for work.
You must understand your duties and obligations as a forum member.

There are rules of signature campaign. If this rules was not executed for 100%, you should not expect BM rewarding, that's simple. Good luck.

People who have not made/created the required post should not receive a stake.
It wouldnt be fair to the people who followed the rules and posted enough.
If you cant make enough post, you shouldnt participate in signature bounties.

I think the best way to reward the signature is that each post should count as a stake and then there should be maximum number of post anyone can make in a week, this way people will be rewarded properly

I believe rules are rules and it should be kept, if the rules are changed the way you suggested, many people will manipulate the bounty, so it is good to spell out the rules and let people abide by it.

It all depends on the team, some bounty managers reward even those who have not made enough posts.

if we want to join the bounty campaign we must first read the rules and we also have to comply with the rules established. So in my opinion it is only natural that we do not obey the terms they give and we will not get anything in each week.

Though this conditions really come up in signatures maybe due to lack of time and later end up not getting stakes for that week and I think this should not be a problem because before you join a campaign, you would have read the rules and regulations of the campaign and know what it will take but in situations like this, some managers may consider the participant but it is a very rare case.

What really baffles me is when I have made the 10 posts for the current week and probably one of threads I posted to was deleted by the mods, I would still not have stakes for that week even after completing it and it wasn't my fault that the thread that I post to was deleted.

Not that the initial rules of the kah before participating in the signature campaign?
so I dropped it it reasonable if any participant does not receive any shares if the requirement of a signature campaign should make constructive 10/15 post per week but the participants did not reach that number.

I'm still thankful to earn reward tokens in signature campaign even how small I can take, I was satisfied for that as a participants because it's clear that you not having investment money for them and still it was earning good. It was depended on you wether you like to hodl and achieve there ICO price per token, to earn much bigger.

This perfectly explains the scenario because not able to afford the ice cream means it will be dropped
In other words, not completing the tasks means no reward

It is harsh but still it is fair rightly because the rules were stated

I think I will have to agree with your suggestion, it will reward everyone for their work, most times even when you make the complete post, sometimes it will get delete and you will not receive any stake because the post doesn't reach the required post per week, so i think this rewarding per post is a good one for me.

Need to follow the rules of evry signature campaign required  mininum post per week
Requiring a mininum and maximum post is fair for the participants if the rate is fair also
a pay per post requirements is the best way to be fair for both parties

Although it will be fair to give them something but my senior colleague i think rules are rules and they are meant to be followed so i personally think we should be mindful of the task we choose. If you think you cannot accomplish the set target just don't engage in it. Also always remember that if it must be done it must be done well.

Yes i am satisfied especially when i am paid because it is much more better if it going to pay you . Doing all that hardwork and you did not been paid it is much more worse than you think so if im getting paid that is enough to satisfied me

There's nothing wrong with the current system of rewarding in signature campaign. If one fails to accomplish the number of posts required to be eligible with the stakes on that week, that's his fault. As bounty participants we should do our task if we are wanting to earn rewards at the end of the campaign.

Almost all the companies whose signatures I participated in gave me a good income. I believe that signature companies are the most profitable of all kinds of bounty.

I've asked to one of manager campaign related that question regarding posts made by participant. I got the answer that manager will give 1/2 stake for participant who need 1 or 2 posts for current week. Hm, its really depending on manager of campaign, hope this will help you.

Rule is still a rule. if anyone cant complete the task, will dont get reward too
i think that's good rule so we must do it

It is fair. The rules are written before you signed up for the campaign. If you want to sign up then you have to agree and respect the rules. If you don't like the rules, then don't join in the first place. As simple as that. That rule isn't the only way to run a campaign though. For example, there is a "pay per post" system in signature campaign, which I think would be more suitable for you.

For signature campaign, I don't really mind for both fixed payment or pay per post system, although I would prefer the pay per post one.

Yes i really believe it all depends on the manager itself.But to avoid some circumstances,just follow the rules.Anyways,we are given enough time to complete the required posts per week.It's up to us how we will handle our time management.If we want to make an income,then we are bound to follow the rules.

yes, with big bonuses; because is a tough job, no more participants should be much reward. So happy to receive a large number of tokens and high prices leaving the floor

In my own opinion, I would suggest that you need to add additional 5 post to be sure that you could get the stakes per week and I had been doing this after a month I started in signature campaign. I had also experience such thing wherein there were weeks I got zero (0) stakes and that is why I started to put additional postings until the present since I find it effective.

normally if you have big repuatation on comments, they will grant the full stakes even though they have low comments. it depends on your popularity.

I think that if your post or comments are usually not off topic, then most likely it will be counted and not deleted. On the other hand, if you want to be more sure that you had complied the requirement, perhaps you should have a buffer post and this is what usually other members were doing. Just continue to do good and non off topic comments and rest assured you will not have to worry much for your stakes. Also, you should have to monitor your profile from time to time and check for the activity for the existing no. of post.

regulation remains the rule. It was established by the manager and at least be made a condition for getting paid. Maybe if the objection to it is better just create their own bounty such rules that you want. with a minimum amount specified will certainly help the marketing of course also effect conferring on the number of sales going on. so the only reason if not able to reach the target and not paid.

You nailed it, my friend! I think it is just rational that we have to follow the minimal rules so that we can be rewarded. This is a give-and-take situation and we can't get what we want if we are not doing the things we should do. Though I understand that maybe OP is trying to say that it can be good if maybe points can also be given to someone who failed to finish what should be done...I am talking of the 10 or 15 posts required but then all of these things can be at the discretion of the project manager and there is nothing we can do on that. This is a take-it-or-leave-it kind of a situation. We have to follow the rules as nobody is exempted anyway.

I don't see anything complicated to make it 15 posts per week for a subscription, I always do even with a reserve just in case 15+2. And as you say 13 posts, you simply will not be paid, as clearly stated at least 15 posts...

Yes I am not satisfied with the allocation of stakes for signature campaign. Junior member like me are distributed very low stakes as compared to other members. But we have to contribute the same as other members. Other thing is that some projects run away without rewarding bounty hunters while some others delay in the distribution.

I'm joining Vertex   signature campaign and this is the first signature campaign i join. Stake for Jr.member rank seems too low.

i dont think about those conditions as long as we work and then they pay us and it's not that easy tho.

satisfied or not is in fact dependent with the reward given, but all reward already described at the beginning of the campaign before we join the bounty signature we can see and count them. If it is not suitable and not satisfied you can find a bounty of other project.

I think that depends on the policies of the campaign manager, the Bounty Hunter is like a guest who will come to the house with the owner, but the house owner is not obliged to provide drinks and food for guests, just my opinion.

Rules are rules. And these rules have been set from the very beginning of the campaign. And before we join any campaign, we should have understood and accepted these rules. Conditions that must be met in order for us to be rewarded. Now we cannot blame the project or the manager for our short comings. It just doesn't work that way.

Just the seller does not want to think and earn more. He could sell half of the ice cream for $ 1.5, but he did not bother. I saw that cigarettes are sold like that.

Well it's ok cos we have the rules if you break the rule's it's your fault and don't tell that you can't read cos we always check and clear the terms and condition before you go inside or do something with the rules so anything you can't get from stake it's all about you but we have telegram that you can talk to the admin if you think they made a wrong works from campaign. Must of the bounties campaign is got a good percentage for cooperation

Agree rules is rules so we need to follow the rules to meet the requirements. Anyway as long as the rules is not impossible to meet. Its need to have good decision and discipline to meet all requirements to get reward at signature campaign.

There may be a solution like this. For example we must make 10 constructive posts per week to get full stakes for a week. But if we make 9 posts, we can get %90 of weekly stakes, 5 posts gets %50 of weekly stakes, 1 post gets %10 of weekly stakes. I think this is more fair.

I think this is a matter of debate someone will tell you that you are right but others will tell you that you are wrong. My opinion it is totally depends on the team of that project what they want . They want 15 post in particular week then right you have to do and it is their right if you did 14 post in that week instead of 15, whether they entertain you or not . So for me that is there right and after completing 15 post you didn't get your stakes then this is your right to get your stakes. You have to follow their norms.

The signature bounty rules is very simple and we must follow that in order to have the stakes for the week, rules is rules to be follow and it always easy to do just divide your target total post for the week or make 3 post per day I think it is enough and easy.

A great example and it is quite right with the question that this topic has given. I see everyone doing more than the minimum number of posts required per week. And those who did not follow the rules will surely never receive rewards

Good post really makes a lot of sense. I think that if a participant is able is able to make 75%+ post there should be a reward for that. However, some managers will give you half of the stakes which are fair. The policy which doesn't reward such people is really bad and must be stopped.

In my opinion the rules for the signature campaigns are simple and fair. It's not a hard thing to make 15 posts per week, it's enough to just make 2-3 posts per day.

I tend to accept my faith if I do not follow the bounty rules and miss out on my stakes. I do not blame anyone except myself. This is why, I follow all the rules carefully and abide by it. Am satisfied with all the bounty rules

It depends on the bounty management, ultimately from the people you deal with, as always. My advice is to read the requirements very well before engaging your time.

If you do not do the requried work you get Zero stakes and that is all you deserve. The rules are there so people actually make the effort 10 posts is less than 2 per day and anyone that cannot manage that is not trying hard enough. I am statisfied with the current rules and have never failed to do the required work.

I don't think that someone even has finished and made more than 75% of the posts should be rewarded by stakes or etc. It means that he/she has not done the tasks yet, or even they were not responsible of the jobs. While they has been fill the form of any signature campaign, they should read the rules and they do it. The reward should be given for them who can finish and follow the rules well. It is like an agreement of work.

Well, since the rule or condition says you have to complete 10 or 15 posts in a week, and not completing the requirement will result to no stakes, those who don't complete should not get rewarded may it sound too harsh. I guess this is still the best ways to reward signature participants.

I don't think the story is parallel to the topic. But still, I get your point.

Regulation of gifts I think is not difficult. And the regulation already clearly suppose that rules, the gift of reads every participant must post a minimum of 10 posts. Means we have to do a total of 10 posts if it does not reach the figure is certainly not going to get the value.

it is a condition that the bounty hunters must follow. it is not the problem of the campaign but the bounty hunter. bounty hunters should be responsible to their work. i joined signature campaign and i give my best effort to meet the condition.

You cannot jump just half the pit. You either jumped it completely or didn't jump at all. There is no third option.

As a junior member, i am not at all satisfied. Bounties are paying very less stakes to junior members.I wear projects signature for two to three months and after that i got very less total stakes. That s why i feel bad many times.

I think it's not a problem. Nowaday bounty hunters are more. And some projects need real value from bounty campains. Hard condition make sure the manager team can choose hard-working people. The less people join, the more reward you gain.

Whatever we do, moreover we do it with sweat and our own thoughts will certainly be more satisfied. If not satisfied, the person is usually cheating and dishonest in doing the work.
As in the gift, we are required to be more qualified and have a good grammar so that whatever posts we do will be in accordance with our performance.

many cheaters in the bounty especially those who are joining and multiple registrations should really look at the manager for nothing to happen because the cheaters are in excess of the bounty especially in the youtube and social campaign but it's easy to see if cheater or do not make it fair to other bounties and not to our neighbors.

It is really important to follow protocols or else your effort will go to nothing.It is stated in the requirements before you apply the project and beforehand you are already informed of what they need from you. It may sound unfair but that is something you need to religiously comply with.

I did not face the same conditions. I've mostly been texting 15 times a week.. Need to strictly fulfill 15. And not two days in a week. I am completely satisfied with this condition. And rewards sign for me, too, until satisfied.

That's why I do not 10 or 15 but 12 or 17 posts. 2 more than necessary. So I'm re insured if any of my messages are deleted.

We have to understand that bounty and signature campaign are serious engagements. When you apply and get signed in with a bounty/signature campaign, is as just like you have been taken in an office job to work and deliver as to the terms of the contract which also has conditions to fulfill and accomplish both ways (from the company/employer and worker, you the employee), so you also have to follow that way in bounties.

Again, the manager of the bounty is under obligation to the ico company too. I know that some icos take part in the selection of applications and won't be surprised if they are also involved in the counting of qualified post too.

However, we can do a pm to the managers if there is a good reason because they are also humans.

as a bounty hunter we must follow the rules that exist. if we want to get the maximum results, then we also have to try optimally. it has become a consequence if we don't get the rewards because we don't obey the rules. completing the bounty is important thing because from that we can learn to be responsible in something.

They have a time that are i'm not satisfied because it was be long weeks to participate in the signature campaign but the bounty rewards are not enough. So that's why ill participated in the campaign are trusted to pay and have some good bounty rewards.

I have this same kind of situation you have, i just post exactly 15 post in the end of the week and i did not recieve a stake when i check my reports i only got 14 post from it i was wondering that the moderator have been delete one of my post. So sad i did not notice it. So now, i have posting my report in more than the said 15 post. Its better to secure right now.

This has been the rule since the start of signature campaign and don't likely to change, 15 post in a week is not to much, you need to put effort that you want to have that reward by following the rules strictly, I think this rule is fair to all, posters and managers if we want to get the rewards then show them that we deserve it.

I don't know if OP is just a Fool and stupid,or a typical idiot..attaining Senior member but asking this stupidity..15 post a week as a requirement is only a peanut if you only have a single account now tell me whats the big reason for you not to comply on this?thats why many bad impressions are throwing towards campaign participants because of the idiotic people like you

Thanks for raising this question, I see that more and more Bounty Campaigns require to make 15 posts a week, which is ineffecient in my view, this may lead to increased spam activity on the forum.
I think it's fair to deny those participants who haven't made the required number of posts, because it's a really time consuming process to count a share from a weekly stake for such users. It would be more suitable for Twitter/Reddit/Facebook bounties rather than for Bitcointalk Signature.

Ideally, rules are rules and so you've got to abide by the rules of the job you do. Imagine writing an exam that needs a 50% pass mark. If you don't get to that 50% and get to about 45% it may depend on your teacher who may or may not give you additional marks but you've failed in the real sense. Bounty campaigns are "jobs" and you should fulfill your job description to get paid. I don't blame managers who award 0 to those who don't reach quota. I have been a victim before and I accepted in good faith... :D

Yes, I am participating in a signature campaign. And yes, I'm very satisfied with joining the signature campaign. I think we must follow that rules in order to have the stakes for the week. It's not a hard thing to make 10/15 posts per week. If you make 3 posts per day I think it is enough.

It's absolutely honest. Participation in bounty companies implies compliance with certain rules, which all participants must perform clearly! And if you write 9 posts out of 10- you do not fulfill the conditions! You will not complain if your boss does not pay you a salary for not completing your work!

I think those rules created to makes everything going as it should.
In my opinion, by following those rules makes it fair for everyone who join the campaign and it would makes the token distribution easy based on the work that are accepted.

If you go for in Signature campaigns I suggest that do consistency with specific principles, which all members must perform unmistakably. my thought is we should take after those guidelines with a specific end goal to have the stakes for the week. simply do the valuable post for the fate of crypto. you have to put the exertion that you need to have that reward by following the principles entirely, I think this administer is reasonable for all, Whatever we do, besides, we do it with sweat and our own considerations will positively be more fulfilled.

rules are changed during signature bounty some times and nowadays more often not in real time! and I find this  unfair

For me, doing a job about 75% of post a week is like to be considered to have any amount of stakes instead of putting nothing, it is very unfair to us hunters to be given a zero stakes for about 75% posting a week. Even a half of stakes per week is enough, because if you do a lot of post for example 15/18, the 3 post is no adding any stakes right. So it is more likely with this op concern.

For me 10-15 posts per week is acceptable. You need to do 2-3 fasts a day, it's very simple. They pay very good money for signature, so these conditions are acceptable.

The biggest problem now is not the number of replies, but not a few bounty is worth participating. Most of the rewards give you a small return.

If you post more than required, you will still get the same stake, but if you post less than required, you won't take a stake, rules are rules, so it is always good to post more than required, just in case some of your post gets deleted.

recently very often our messages are deleted by moderators and thus one can not get their steaks. While many Bounty companies have a manager who does not maintain spreadsheets on time. That as a result can lead to minimum earnings.

For me anytime i join signature campaign, i always make more than the required post and i always get my stake, i think making more than required is a good idea, and of course if you make below the required post, you shouldn't get a stake because it is clearly stated before you join?

I think the rewards for signatures campaign is still okay Because they do allocate up to 20% of the bounty for it and it makes it look good to sometime. So I'm still satisfied to some extent.

Here in this platfrom everyone wants to make profit of his simple hardwork and make more money from more hardwork .
Here if the campaigns will make strict rules then surely they can easily cut out the payout of the participants and from that they can save to run Thier campaign for long term .
Well here i would like to suggest you that , you should make posts 2-3 more than what the maximum amount of the posts , in that way they will not deny you to pay in any case .
if you please let to share information in this forum of Bitcoin is a very tedious task and very annoying thing to write topic and give opinion and suggestion for the better results then I would like to suggest that don't give your time in this forum long time in a day you should divide your timing in 3 to 4 interval per day , and in this way you will be able to work more efficiently then what are the required by the campaign .

the applicable rule is in compliance and not incriminating and also even paid for this encounter. When it was not qualified to do this job then it is natural when not getting paid. 10-15/week is not heavy and I think anyone can do that because there is a 7 day a week to finish it. There is no reason for them because a lot of people working on it and they were able to in the finish.

I've had cases where I still counted a week when I had fewer posts than I needed. Because my post was deleted, and I did not immediately notice it. But I guess I just got the inconsiderate bounty manager. I'm still trying to write a little more posts than I need to. It's safer.

There have to be rules and we have to follow them as without rules it would be a chaos and everybody would complain.
Biggest problem is when you write 15 constructive comments and the bounty manager not giving stakes immediately but
on the end of the campaign and if some of the threads you made a post is deleted in the meantime together with your comment
and suddenly you have only 14 comments and not meeting the criteria.

For you to have read the instructions clearly written means you accepted to follow the rules, hence yoh should abide by them in strict compliance. Some bounty managers are considerate to a point because I once participated in a bounty campaign where I ought to make three post in a week but I ended up making two posts, the manager would then give me 75% of my stake for my efforts.

I personally am satisfied with one company in one company, but I participated in another one, not very much, the greedy team got caught, I will not sound names, but still, when you expect 30% of you and give you a penny, this does not please

Each bounty manager has different rules about signature campaigns. Starting from the number of posts in a week, the spread of posts within a few days, and the number of stakes obtained. Of course this rule must be obeyed so that the results obtained will be maximum.

I think it's not that hard to write 10 or 15 comments a week. Sometimes it's a shame when delete comments, although I like not wrote that the delusional, but that do about it. So I write with a margin.

Actually we us a bounty hunter participating signature campaign maybe we must follow in what the rules said.
10/15 post a week for me it was enough than to post 20 post per week.

In my opinion, everything is true, the conditions are simple - to make a certain number of posts, and it is for this number of posts to get a stake!

i think its fair, because making 9 post out of 10  is definitely against the rules,
maybe in the future there will be new regulations that mention making 1 very high quality post worth 2 or 3 posts, bounty manager has the right to assess the quality,
maybe this kind of regulation will make this forum cleaner from spammers

Not sure about that. The rewards for the bounties overall seem to of gone down a lot though. I think the %s should be put up personally.

I joined in a signature campaign right now. I read the first the mechanics and rules of the signature campaign before i start, because it is very important to follow the rules. If you dont met the required posts before the cut off, i think it is right that you dont have a stakes for that week. Rules is rules. We must obey.

I was satisfied because there's no money I invest for which it is called as opportunities in crypto. It's not hard those task where it is more worth that we involve here.

Signature campaign is one of my favorite campaign due of signature sometimes have the highest bounty allocations among other campaigns but the best on this is if you are owning a high ranked account the rewards you will receive in distribution was huge sadly there are some bounty managers won't accepts less posts and concluding to don't have stakes on the week.

Very simple if logic will be used, you are required to meet the qualification as dictated from the rules, if you didn't meet that then don't ask further, if you are concerned about missing out some required post then talk to the manager and gentle informed them, there's no any issue if you missed he first week and surpass the other one around, just keep in mind that things will be determined by the manager and it's him to decide if he will give you the stake or not.

All projects have their own conditions. If you take part in their bounty campaigns, then you must work according to their rules.It does not matter how many posts you do not have 1 or 2 you still will not get a reward.

Well agreement is an agreement. It actually depends on them whether they'll give extra credits for people who met more than the required posts but, I haven't encountered any campaigns like this before. The best reward would probably higher stakes.

It's fair because the rules are stated clearly that only if you reached that post count per week then you will receive your stake. It is not that hard to make a constructive post rather than work from morning until late afternoon compared to posting 2-3 constructive posts per day.

So far I am satisfied with the projects I joined.

      It is very clear rule that post will be 15 post per week so if ever you are not able to reach that 15 post then you're not entitle to receive tokens , as per the rules specified but one of my friends experiencing this case which instead of 15 post but he was able to reach 14 and he still got his tokens so it depends of the manager,

If you started participating in the signature campaign, you accordingly agreed to the rules and requirements that were put forward to the participants.
To be honest, I do not see a problem for 7 calendar days to write whether it's 10 or 15 constructive messages.

participating in a good bounty program is everyone's dream, but when we are faced with a bounty that has a problem, we must be ready,
but as long as I follow the bounty according to what I want.

I personally will not comment on whether this is fair or not. But I think when someone agrees to do something (10/15 posts) to get something else in exchange (tokens), it is right for both sides to be correct to each other and to make the arrangement just as described in the "contract".

The reason why signature campaign was created is because it is one the best type of advertisement for an ICO to reach out to a true investors. You wears the their ICO banner which will be attach to your name and by posting your thoughts, their banner will also be posted and will be advertise. The many you post, the higher the chance for their ICO to be seen by many. Rules are created for us to have meet the companies expectation since bounty hunters are their employee or free lancers. As an employee, we are obligated to follow the instructions given by the boss right? I don't have a problem if I were unable to get a stake because of my own mistake since it is my responsibility from the beginning.

10 or 15 posts per week is not too much, so 90% of people finish it easily and smoothly. If you do not meet the bounty manager's minimum requirements, you will not be eligible to receive a reward for that week. But sometimes I see some BM still give priority and give reward to those who only perform 9 posts. But it is very rare because they broke the rules

Personally, I think that's the law and the bounty managers will follow the lead they gave from the beginning, most no one will complain about that either

I think it is not heavy. It is a rule that is applied by the organizers that they reserve the right to give the rules because they give us a wage or salary. If we state joined in the projects then we should be ready with the rules set forth. in my own experience it ever so my postings amount to less than the provision in the week, but the BM provides a policy I still get value although it is not full.

For me it depends of the bounty campaign manager or the persons who evaluate and check your post. It is good to know that not only completing the 10 or 15 post are the qualifications for as to recognize our works but it is only for the content of our works. If it is very knowledgeable post or great constructed post I think it is convincible to count or to recognize as a good post. So it is mean all of those issues are depends on the persons who will check our works and activities.

In my opinion, we cannot fight these rules. indeed it looks heavy we have made a post according to the target number and suddenly some of our posts are deleted by the moderator. The best solution is not to make a post according to the minimum target. If you can make more than the target number.

I think it's fair :). Everyone need to read rule before joining and I think everything about rule of any signature campaign is really clear and I don't think it's too difficult to follow rule of signature campaign :). Beside there is 7 days a week so I think it's really easy to make enough 10 - 15 posts everyweek.

A rule is a rule. I think the rule was made  in order to make the participants having more qualified posts. Besides the rule will require the participants to b emote responsible for their job. So,  if we can't make 10 or 15 post a week,  we wouldn't get the reward,  and that's true.

Well it's fair, before you joined you need to read and make sure you understand the rules, if you don't fulfill the requirements then you won't get paid, even if you only completed 99% it still consider as failed, but some campaign does give a little compensation, but it's your responsibility to complete the requirements

It certainly has been set based on existing regulations and with the intention for the sake of running a good promotion. If hope still gets paid but do not comply with the minimum rules it is recommended then surely everyone would be doing it and it's just the same as not agreed on rules that have been created. so I guess there is no relief in this case because if you want big results then obviously the professionals should be the main one.

I like joining in signature campaign.
you have to read carefully the rules before you join to get stakes.
and i think the rules is fair enough.
for me, it is not hard to make 10-15 post in a week.
to gain more stakes you have to do some effort and responsibility.

This is the rules and regulations that each project regulates. Each project has their calculations and direction. Joining yourself will be based on it, to have decisions to join each program

Very smart for your questions and my appreciation.

With an answer like that, I am sure that the Bounty manager applies the right rules and I agree exactly the same as what you are talking about.

There is no reward if you didn't reach post count goal.
In some cases if there is good bounty manager ( not in case of Amazix) , I try to suggest more posts in following week and usually they accept it.

I have observed of course as that is mentioned in the rules when we participate in any campaign and yes I somehow feel cheated when that happens when you fall short with only 1 post. But then again rules are rules and we need to follow them otherwise there is no relevance of having rules.

Yeah, as I'm still here in the crypto currency community I'm definitely satisfied by joining different bounty campaigns especially signature campaign. Though, some of them can't really be assure since there is a lot of scammers here in the cyberworld. I believe someday that I can have a great return on my effort by joining signature campaign.

The strict rules provided by the Bounty Manager are just marketing for the ICO marketing to succeed.
So if we violate these rules it will suppress the success of the ICO, we better follow the rules so that we are appreciated.

awards are different everywhere, but I am quite satisfied with the reward received everywhere it is worthy

Actually we are satisfied in rewards of the bounty campaign that we participate if the rewards was big or enough for us. But if not maybe we are not satisfied but for this reason maybe to be blame of this is ourselves because we did not make sure of the campaign that we participated has have enough bounty rewards to distribute.

I got your point bro! Good scene example about the situation or to the concern of the thread creator, however, yes the rules must be followed because it is the requirements of the certain campaign if you can't complete the required post then, of course, a participant is not worth it to get the rewards it's simple. I am not against the rule of signature campaign because I know the signature is one of highest percentage to get rewards that is why we need to work hard to complete all the need to qualify for rewards.

In each campaign, their terms of participation and their unequivocal implementation. If you do not comply with the conditions you will immediately be excluded from the list of participants.

I do not see anything complicated or unpleasant in the signatures. If I'm already interested in this subject, then in any case I will read and talk on the forum, so the signature does not bother me in any way.
But you need to consider some rules. If the rules of the signature are such that they interfere or complicate communication, then it is up to the participant to decide. I do not take on complicated rules that will interfere with me. But personally I do it for my pleasure, and the signature is a nice bonus.

Easks in bounty companies in particular in the signature are not significantly different only in the number of posts per week and each time they are more and more difficult to fulfill them especially for the minimum status of the award is very small,i think many partipicant do min post to do their report,becouse why do more?

In my point of view is the reward deserved to the hard worker bounty hunter. I already satisfied of reward from signature campaign. I think person who constribute more for the project deserve bonus like bonus stakes maybe. Just do the job and wait for big reward.

I think that it is impossible to divide the award. Either you complete the task in a week and get a reward - or not.

They have set up rules if you cannot meet the rules and the guidelines then don't participate at all, if they allow it, it will be abused by people, it's not that hard to create 15 post a week, you just allocate your time it will not cost you a lot of time to post 2 or three times, you will have a problem if you have a lot of altcoins.

Each campaign bounty has its own rules that must be followed. If you do not comply and do not follow these rules and do not carry out assignments, then why pay a reward? Of course there are exceptions, and there are managers who can count you bets, even though you have not made the minimum number of messages.

I think it's fair when counting is for a completely done job and I think it's right if you had 9 posts allowed, but you need 10 that the stake will not be counted!

in my opinion this kind of thing doesn't need to be questioned because it's obvious before following an ICO project we have to read every rule given before joining the project and if indeed we cannot follow it, they also do not force it into the program, Regarding you have posted more or less than what has been determined but get a reward, it all goes back to each of the project managers. so the point is if you are ready to take part in an ICO you must also be prepared with all the ICO rules.

I think everyone should read and follow the rules of the signature in order to get a reward. Many do not receive remuneration when they stop fulfilling the conditions specified in the rules and then complain, although they do not fully perform the work.

The reward on the signature campaign you have joined or any bounty is always depending on how many people who invested in their campaign so it will be so high or so low but if you are a higher rank then it will be always high and good enough to sustain your daily needs.

It's sort of a contractual agreement. You meet this condition, and then I pay you. You fail to meet the condition, I dont pay you. It's as simple as that. But if the campaign managers are kind enough to reward one's efforts, I'll be very glad  ;D

Conditions are like a parameter or guideline to follow to achieve a task and signature campaign always come with its own specific tasks and it is left for you as a person to complete your own task and then get paid at the end of it.

There is nothing hard to understand in it, and another thing that may make some people to always get screwed with most especially bounty signature campaigns is that they always fail to do what is important when it comes to verifying the authenticity of the ICO they are participating in.

It's depends on bounty manager rule. If you want participate "some bounty" let's follow the rule. Simple like that

Just like in a real life job, you get your job description or your terms of reference and you deliver based on that. If you fail to deliver, obviously you will not get to blame anyone for not getting what you duly deserve because at that point you deserve nothing.

The same is applicable to signature campaigns, do your bit, and as long as you get certified with your post, you get what you deserve and obviously, you will always know your possible potential earning or close to, beforehand.

I think this all depend on the project, in some project you may earn less than 300 dollar as junior member and it could give you x4 profits on exchange . Signature campaign or any other bounty campaign rewards depends on how many hunters promote the project.

Before joining a campaign bounty, you should familiarize yourself with all the rules and tasks that you should follow to get the reward. if you are ready to do it - then participate, it's simple. Each campaign bounty has its own rules, choose those campaigns, the rules of which suit you best.

That actually depends on the bounty manager and it's his/her prerogative. I have once participated in a bounty campaign [signature campaign] which i failed to complete the total posts required in a week (17 out of 20 posts) but still the bounty manager gave me a corresponding stake.

Some managers will give a fraction of a complete stakes for one week like for example if the stakes for one week is 8 then you've posted only 9 instead of 10 per week , so they will give 7 , but  the other ICO managers will not give any considerations , if you'll not able to make 10 post per week or 15 post per week , it automatically you've got zero , but we can't do nothing about it since it is very clear on the rules .

An absolutely good question as this kind of conditions would promote unnecessary comments and that would, in turn, pollute the forum. Emphasis should be laid out on more and more constructive posts.

I think that the requirements are not so high, 10-15 posts7answers a week is not  an impossibile contition, there are some bonities like sylon ones that requires also more than 20 posts a week. If you don't do at least these minimum posts it's correct that you won't receive stakes.

I am not satisfied on this matter, because sometimes part of my posts got deleted and I don't receive stakes for that week and it hurts me.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.

I think their rules are easy and with some time we can accomplish them. Anyway I am frustrated when my posts are deleted and I do not accomplish the number of posts because of that.

10 or 15 posts per week is not much. There are requirements and higher.
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks

Yes of course, there requirements are appropriate to the reward you will get after. Also signature campaign is one of the way to earn especially to those newbie in cryptocurrency. Also I like how they give reward because they rules are easy to do and to follow, that's why lot of people are take that opportunity to participate in signature campaign. Signature campaign is the good start to  world of cryptocurrency.

I've got your point about the task it makes me clear that bounty manager must give some coordination about the work we didn't reached. But still we read and accepted their requirements in their bounty campaign and I think that it is enough to follow their rules and regulation in order to get the given stakes after the end of the week.

I do not have any problem with that, thats rules and we have to follow them. If you are not satisfied and you do not want to agree that rules, you can always leave the campaign. I am very thankful for bounty campaigns :). So I  try to do my best to help them.

They will not adjust that because it's not the fault of the manager, it's all your fault because you do not really try and work hard to help the project, you just work at the bare minimum and this laziness has hurt you. You can not complain, instead of trying to complain and encourage them to adjust, you should write more every day, that will be a guarantee for your reward and efforts, I always did so when I first faced situations where the post was deleted, the reward is always consistent with each of your actions, this is what I noticed in the signature campaign

Their conditions don't bother me and for me it is not a problem that we have to respect a certain number of posts. I think it is worth it.

It is absolutely fair because there are campaign rules you have to obey.
Another problem is when you make those, say, 15 posts and while the stakes are being calculated (which usually takes several days) the btt forum's moderators delete the topics you wrote in will all the comments. So you end up with 14 or 13 posts instead of 15 and are not given the reward.
That's why I usually make 2-3 posts more in order to avoid such a situation.

Rules should always be so strict so people won't try to cheat. By joining the Bounty Campaign you agreed to the rules and so you should follow it. If you think making almost the amount of quota but failed to reached it should have a consideration and receive stake then Bounty will become chaotic if the manager do this. How about those people who doing the right job than you.

every project must have its own rules, we as a bounty hunter must comply with the terms and regulations of the project, if we expect a reward, so obey And do what has been determined, then you will get a Benefit, try and pray that can only we do.

I regularly participate in signature campaigns to earn bonuses. Recently I was very disappointed with the signature campaigns. Paid very slowly and very little. I want when the campaign is over to receive money.

I am quite satisfied with the Bounty program I have been involved in! The value is not high but I noticed it has development association!

I am pleased that the percentage distributed to the signature campaigns of the bounty. However, I was very disappointed when the ABLE project scoured the bounty hunter and blocked all connections to their community groups and official social networking sites.

For me yes like the project I participating now they rewarding me or paying me a good price for my signature campaign on them. Find a project like this that they are paying you rightly so I'm very thankful that I participate on this project specially to their signature campaign. And I'm very satisfied to my signature on them.

I think that rules is some kind of agreement that are created and should be agreed before we are join that bounty, for me that is acceptable.
And for participant that aren't meet that requirement that is absolutely won't get any stakes even if they just lacking 1 post.

so far satisfied
but why has it been for the past 7 months, the process of listing tokens to exchangers is so long that I can't sell all the tokens I have.

Still about to find out. My first signature campaign will end in a couple of weeks. They switched from excel reporting to a public sheet on a bounty website, which is not showing the correct stakes for weeks now. Im just sitting this one out to see what happens and how much stakes i will end up with.

At the moment you cannot earn a lot of money with bounty, but from all bounties signature are still most profitable from all of it. So you need just to wait. At the moment all project are at low level!

Yes, it's really easy to make 10-15 posts per week. We can complete it within 2 - 3 days and just around 30 - 60 minutes per day. That's the rule and we have to accept its rule if we want to do something.

we can only follow the rules that apply, fair or unfair we must keep following. because they pay us.
I think, if I have a project, the regulation is very appropriate.
especially as a tool for filtering people who are serious and not participating in the bounty.
there is no tolerance even though there are deficiencies, this is only a matter of consistency or not the participants.

I think with such rules there must be, because if there is someone who does not reach the limit of the post, while others exceed the specified post limit, but the result is the same as the stake, then it is unfair, if you want to get a stake but the number of posts is not reach the minimum limit, it is better to count the stake based on the number of posts, so it will be fair for those who are diligent in posting

This is a very nice analogy. Lets consider signature campaign as a reality world business and we are the employee, companies wanted a product which is fully presented and complete. If we give them unfinished jobs or products, they will deny the entire batch of our product. Just like this.

I found the DAEX project a few weeks ago and joined it in just one week. The great thing is that they quickly paid me a bonus, however the value of the token was only $ 60 per week involved, I found it quite a

I see the laws of the signature campaign need to post within 3 days or more, if less will not be counted because it is spam

For me anytime i join signature campaign, i always make more than the required post and i always get my stake, i think making more than required is a good idea, and of course if you make below the required post, you shouldn't get a stake because it is clearly stated before you join?

It is very difficult to obtain satisfaction from the very small amounts that projects pay out this year. This cannot be called a good enough payment because this money can only be enough to go to a cafe once, for example.

I liked ICO Spokzzz more. There was a reward system. Only 21 posts per week. You have to write for the whole company more than 31 posts. To get a reward. And steaks for each individual member.
For each post you received an award of the corresponding rank. jm.member 1 steak per post. 21 post = 21 stakes . I really liked the system. Very convenient and simple.

Actually if anyone has joined the crypto and bounty campaigns over half a year are familiar with the general rules of the bounty. They are easier to get involved with fewer obstacles

21 posts per week!  It's a lot.  In my opinion, ten is the maximum.  But I did not rule the rules.  My first signature was ten posts a week and 40 words minimum.  Paid normally for my rank.

Those are the rules of a signature campaign, of course the rules must be obeyed if we want to get a prize. And if it turns out our work is lacking, only 75% or 80% is fair if he does not get a prize. because this is indeed the rule. can't be denied.

For results that are satisfied and whether it's a risk from the bounty hunter, so if you want results that are satisfied then choose a project that has a large allocation, so the prizes obtained are also great later. If you choose a careless project, the prize is also not suitable.

This a good answer for this, if you understand this analogy it might answer your question. If you want to earn you need to work for it, follow the rules to recieve payment. It may feel bad that  follow their instruction but in the end some of your post are deleted and did not got paid.   Its their rules,  you choose to join signature campaign so follow the rules.

It is important to read the rules of the bounty carefully, there are many to choose from. If they state that you must write at least 10 posts, then you should do more than that in case some posts do not qualify or are deleted by a mod

I agree that it is a shame when you made the required 10 messages and when calculating the rates the administration deleted 1 of your post and you do not receive anything. But this is how the world works. Pay for work done, not for almost done

I have not received any token from the bounty, since I have just joined a single campaign recently. My worry is that the bounty is now too much bounty hunter and bounty scam

I think that rules are rules and if a person is not able to fulfill them - it's his personal fault and he should get 0 stakes, that is fair at least.

It all depends on the conditions , some companies immediately write that you have to do 15 and even if you do 10 you still do not count.

Of course I am satisfied with it, the reason that there are so much stipulations is to make sure that the people that are doing the bounties are actually the ones that are serious about it. They would not get half hearted posts if they were very lax on the rules and that is why they put such stipulations on them. I don't have a problem with it

I think it's fair. That is the rule. We join the campaign that mean we have accepted its rule. It's similar when you take an exam to get a certificate, you have to get at least 50% of total score. If you only get 49% that mean you have failed

There are so many ICO who became a scam, there are some ICO who went out failed.
but as of now this is my 2nd round. i love this bounty and joined it again.
BAANX is really something i could never resist.
look at my signature now and join us.

When you mentioned you joined the 2nd round of the campaign i thought the project is already on exchange. Clearly this the first time am hearing of this project and it is dangerous to so much trust in project that has not gotten on an exchange except you are part of the team. Cryptobank is still a worry to the space, have not seen any success project in the focus.

Well they have their own rule and we need to obey that, since we join the campaign or bounty that it means we should do as we told.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Making 10 or 15 posts are not something impossible to do, so if we're required to do that, why we just post 9 or 13? We should have pushed ourself and make more post, at least we fulfill the requirements.
Joining signature campaign is like having a job, you won't get paid if you don't do your job properly, or just do it halfway. Since that means it's not complete yet, no matter what.

Rules in the company are that. You can observe them and if you do not want just do not participate in that company. Maybe would be more honest to charge percent from the written posts, but there are no such rules anywhere.

Everyone knows the rules and the number of posts which are required in the campaign, so if almost everyone completes the number, why not you? You should have control of your account and your posts, I think it's fair enough to refuse your job in the week where you do not meet the rules.

At the moment I am very dissatisfied with what I get from subscription campaigns because the amount is very small to live on it, and in General, many projects for a long time do not pay the participants of the bounty program what they should. This is very upsetting because we spend a lot of time on it

actually it's very easy, we have to obey all the rules that apply to every gift that
we follow and if we violate it, we will receive the consequences, that is not the
value for the week, and accuracy is the main and patience we must have .

Yes signature campain is so great.
That why syatem rank will make a different reward.
And yes signature is so profitable than other campain.

Join the ICO signature campaign, you accept the terms and conditions listed there. Failure to comply with the conditions for writing a certain number of messages leads to not charging rates for the week. This is true. I do not think that the bounty manager should charge fewer bids based on fewer written messages. It is quite difficult and will lead to confusion.
There is another problem here. You write the required number of messages, however the forum deletes several of them for various reasons, including due to the deletion of the topic, its transfer to the archive, and so on. In this regard, you are not charged rates. By the way, this problem is very common.

75% of the subscription is fully worthy in my opinion. If it is judged by the rules, it still hasn’t fulfilled the conditions and this is decided by each manager bounty campaigne. 10-15 messages are easy to do here, where there were still bounty signature where 25 messages are required. We need new rules for bounty then there will be a development of the whole blockchain industry.

Hi, I do not see the bad in the rules of subscription campaigns.
The rules are created to fulfill them.
There are subscription campaigns where you need 5 messages per week, and there are campaigns where you are paid for each message.

It would be cool if the number of stacks was considered depending on the number of posts, that is, for example, Full Member receives for 15 posts per week 5 stacks, then for 10 he would receive 3.3 stacks. But of course no one will do so in order to save money. But I think if there was such a bounty campaign it would be very popular.

I believe that the condition is a condition. And if you took the job, you have to do it to the end and completely. A large number of people take part in the campaign and all of them must be equal and follow the rules equally.

I think before any signature campaign participant sign up to join the campaign, he or she must have gone through the rules guiding the campaign and signing up means agreement to the terms and condition of the campaign. Therefore anything short if that is not accepted because if 75 percent opportunity is given, participants will take it for granted, so no need of creating such.

all the rules given in my opinion do not impose your work in your daily life. if you are active in the forum, you may be able to achieve the rules given in the signature campaign. and in my opinion it is appropriate for those who have not succeeded in completing the task and they do not get a stake on that week, whatever the reason if the rules are not done correctly the consequence you do not get a stake or profit

I participate in the bounty campaigns and those rules seem reasonable to me. I think they have the right to make their own rules. It doesn't bother me to make the number of posts they want. It is worth doing it!

Every campaign manager is different and has different perspectives about rewards. But at the end rules and rules. They are created to be respected, so normally if someone doesn't have 15 approved posts at the end of the week, he/she shouldn't receive the reward. Of course, there could be an extra rule where the manager says that users will receive rewards even if they didn't made enough posts but they will be lower than normal.

If you care that you cannot write 10 or 15 messages, then just do not participate in the bounty companies. In my opinion it is quite easy and if you are afraid that a purge of this forum will be deleted some messages, write larger number of commentary.

Think, that conditions for signature which requires administrator-acceptable. If someone thinks that you need to make a lot of 15 or 10 messages-then you can choose other companies. There is such which require to do 7 or 5 messages.

Before you join in any campaign there is already a rule that they post and all of this requirements should be accomplish. I think it is fair because it is already clear  in the rules that you will not get any stakes if you did not meet the required task and you know the consequence if you didn't fulfill your work.

I am satisfied with any project that pays out the rewards at this point since most of them seem to be making us wait for so long before they actually pay out the coins. By then the price of the coins would have dropped so much that they are not worth much anymore. But so far I am satisfied with the rewards that I have gotten from campaigns

I think that the rules are necessary in order to obey them, so if you need to make 10 posts, then you NEED to make at least 10 posts.

In every business, rule is very important. Before you joined the campaign, you saw the rules and they are clearly stated. It is now left to you if you can abide to the rules. If you are not comfortable with it and you know you cannot follow it duly, then there is no need to join. If the manager decides not to give you any stake, he is right.
Had it been he allows you to bridge the rule by posting less, then others too will do the same and that might lead to a faulty campaign.

That is rule and we can againts it, and all bounty managers have their rights to make decision whether participants get stake or not. I know it is hard if we almost reach minimum post and not get stake, and you know what is worse than that? you make post with minimum requirements on rule, and topic that you have posted on that is deleted  ;D

Yes, I always got good rewards through the signature campaign! Of course, because I'm a Member, I'm proud to demonstrate this position, but in relation to blog campaigns, signature campaign is not behind in terms of rewards and as I'm always active in the forum, I find it incredible to be paid to post opinions and some shitopinions. ;D

It's okay with me to earn small rewards as far as it's worth my effort to participate in such program I believe as a reward I earn still it has a good value in market and can have a potential to grow more. It's been good here in crypto in where we can expect earnings without investment.

The bigger problem regarding signature campaign is ICO project management reduces the allocated signature funds from the bounty campaign or they don't pay as they bounty Ann announces. About incomplete post there must be some relaxation to give reduced stakes based on the task completed out of targeted posts. Also as a Bounty hunter one must obey the rules of the bounty campaign to complete the assign task weekly.

I am currently participating in a signature campaign, I think the rules issued by the bounty manager are fair enough, in the rules written minimum post a week is 10, then we must post according to target. if we can only post 9 in a week, then that is our mistake and of course we will not be rewarded. If we participate in the signature campain, then of course we must follow the rules set by the bounty manager, and when our posts are lacking, it is our fault

Whether it's fair or not is subjective, I've been in quite a few signature campaigns and I think some bounty managers are more flexible than others, equally if they don't give me the stakes because I don't complete the required weekly post, I can't do anything, since the rules are pretty clear on the subject and I agreed before entering the bounty.

Sometimes I'm satisfied but sometimes not because some of bounty project a good rewards to participants they give us a small amount of reward after months of working with them. I hope they give a fair reward to who joined signature campaign.

Yeah, every BM has their rules for th signature campaign. I always participate in the signature campaign. So far, I follow the rules because that is what I must fulfil. When I'm supposed to make at least 10 posts per week, I will do more, about at least 12 posts to anticipate when there are deleted thread or posts. I think that it is fair enough because the BM has already clearly states on the rules.

Yes most of the time I was satisfied with token reward given by a certain campaign. Sometimes it doesn't provide an enough value to me in times of trading, but I can find it more challenging during the holding period.
Other hunters were frustrated, but they don't have to feel it because in every project it needs to reach the hardcap. We cannot assure it will be met, so it's expected the token given to bounty participants will be reduced and it also happen to me twice on the previous projects I had.

if you only finish outside the exact conditions it will not be accepted and will not receive shares in that week, because it is an obligation to post 15 or 10 yes we must be able to do it because from the beginning we already know the terms, so in my opinion it is fair and reasonable. .

As long as I follow the signature campaign, of course I have to follow the rules because I have made 9 posts with the rules of having to make 10 posts in 1 week, but what happened I did not get stake that week even though I have posted 90% of what they ask, then from the above case it is clear we have to make a post in accordance with the applicable rules and if we make a post of more than 10 then we still get a stake and I think that is fair enough for me.

Signauture campaign now it s not satisfactory. The participants are too many so the rewards will be too small. I like to join manager taht limit sig camp participants. it will earn better than unlimited members. Strict manager is important because he will disqualify the lazy members. I think income from sig campaign is getting lower now.

I recently returned to the forum, but judging by the reviews, some companies pay really well, especially for a signature, so I decided to try to participate in one of the projects I liked, let's see what happens.

Unfortunately (or should I say fortunately?) things work like this in the real world, and in any company, institution or formal or informal organization there are rules and conditions that must be met by all concerned. That is why before joining a signature campaign the rules should be read well, because once you send your application to join, you are tacitly accepting the rules. Therefore, if you believe that you are not able to comply with the minimum rules of a campaign, then you should abstain from participating in it.

Rules is rules and whats being stated should really be followed because before you do apply on the campaign it is already understandable that you do agree on the terms posted on op which means if you haven't met the post required then you wont really received any stakes unless if manager do took some consideration but it would be only good on 1 week only and no another chance if you do commit it again.
Once you are on a campaign then follow all the rules then you should be fine. If not then you would simply get "0" stakes on that week.

To be fair, I think that signature bounty rewards are satisfactory. We should know that these teams are not just paying you, and individual, but so many others who participated in the bounty scheme. I just think that they should do better with time duration of distribution of the bounty rewards, it shouldn't take so much time to be distributed.

There are times that we are not satisfied and there are also time that we are also satisfied , but ay first we can blame the manager or admin of the project  because they are also trying to make to promote the ICO project to reach the projected soft cap or even the hard cap, so if things will be worst , we still continue to support because of the too many ICOs there are much competetion , so they ate tryong hard to make the project succesful.

How would you like the bounty campaign manager to do if you have written fewer messages less than what is specified in the specific conditions of joining the ICO signature campaign? . Let's say for ten messages you should have counted two steaks. You have made eight posts. Do you think that the manager should have proportionally less, that is, 1.6 steaks? No one, of course, will do this. There are certain conditions with which you agree to join, and they must be fulfilled.

I think rule is rule, before a bounty hunter sign up for signature campaign he/she understand the weekly requirement and I don't see it as an unfair thing if the person didn't get stake by not following the rule.

I believe that the payment should take place in a full week, if 15 posts are necessary, it means you need to do 15 otherwise confusion will start, and managers will have much more work to check

Every bounty have its own rule and those rules are published at the start of the bounty and if you are not agreed with their rules, you can leave that but you cannot question their rulings.

I have taken a part in 3 bounty campaigns (3rd one is ongoing right now) and they all have been (or are) signature campaigns.

The first campaign was really successful - made 2 months pay with 3 weeks.

The second campaign was all nice apart of the part that they didn't pay out :P :P :P. About 2 months wasted, they never told me what I did wrong.

And the campaign I'm in right now seems again like a good one :) - team is active and all seems good.

I think some campaing's rules are kinda too hard. I think they just could pay less to people who makes less posts. That will be fair. But they don't doing it. And it makes me doubt in a lot of things about them.

Yes, this is a case to case basis different project and company have their own rules. So for me I think its better to choose campaign that their rules will suit to your style or way of doing the campaign. Because in signature campaign some required you to post 15 per week others just 9 post so its individual decision which project they will join.

I've joined the signature campaign for several times, and some of them pay a good reward but some of them doesn't pay good, i mean the reward is a rather a lot, but the price of the coins isn't good enough.

I think that people that perform different jobs to receive the same tocheny , one person has made 5 posts and the other 10 , as everywhere in every field who makes more he gets everything , and who is cunning with nothing.

Yes, I'm very satisfied in joining signature campaigns since I only join signature campaigns whose campaign managers have good trust rating and big bounty pool for sig campaign because I dont want my effort to be put to waste and not be paid after a few months of participating.

I think that it is absolutely fair not to reward those who didnt complete the task. Bountyhunters are employees. Do employees work as they want? I dont think so

I am satisfied. Dont you think that it would be too much for bountyhunters if they do what they want it get money for this? Dont be lasy and posts as much as needed

Not really I only manage to get 1 legit campaign this year,
And the reward that I got is so small  so for me I am not satisfied with it.

There are some bounty managers who still count your post as complete but some also are strict and must comply of what is the rule said. If I were the bounty manager I would not be greedy if they got 75% posting I will give her or his stake 100%.

So far as it's a condition, it is supposed to be confirmed by everyone with no exceptions. However, people get their post detected in course of the week and in such cases some bounty managers consider and reward you accordingly. Some take BM look at your posts quality and if they are satisfied they can give you full stakes for that week.

This rule always written at the time of start of the bounty and if you are not agreed with those terms, why you go to join that campaign as it is mandatory to follow rules to get your stakes/coins. It is also like a job work and we have to do our job as demanded to get paid.

I am very unsatisfied with signature campaigns at the moment, because during the last 5 months I have took part in 3 signature campaigns. One team has reduced the budget by x10, another team distributed coins but is still not live on exchanges and the last one dropped like x10 from the ICO price.

Signature campaigns were not popular until late last year to mid this year, since then the values are rewards have decreased and thereby decreasing the popularity and interest again. Just like every other bounties with their rules, signature campaigns have theirs rules and if flaunted one are denied of the stakes, however I do not go for campaigns that ask for more than 12 posts per week and should be short lived

In my opinion, you raised a very correct topic of conversation. Different bounty managers have different requirements, some require 10 mandatory posts, some 15, some are willing to pay even 30 posts, but for those who make fewer posts according to the established norm, they do not get paid. I think this is unfair.

each signature campaign has its own rules for making posts every week, before you join in the signature you must have read it and if you fill out the form it means you are able to make 10/15 posts every week, if you don't achieve that means You break the initial agreement and you are indeed not eligible to get a stake if it is not reached

I don't think that that there is a good bounty campaign this year,
Or am I the only one who had join a signature campaign that turns out to be a scam or ends up to be super dump in the market.

Well, you just chose the wrong campaign. I know that people still continue to earn tokens. You now have a good signature campaign) ;)

Bounty manager has the full right to approve its own rules of bounty campaign, if these rules are clear and transparent. If the rules stated that you must write at least 15 posts a week, the bounty manager has every right not to give you stakes for 14 posts and less.

It all depends on the Campaign Manager and the participants, If the participant is going good every week and one week he is short of 1 post then i think some campaign managers accept it and they will count that 1 post  in next week. But if the participant make this as a every week habit then i think he wont get payment for other weeks. Some campaign managers are very strict and just follow the rules and dont pay you.

I believe that the person participating in the signature of the company first reads the conditions, and then decides to agree to these conditions or not! You will not pay the company if it prescribed you to build a house in the contract, but did not complete its work! Of course, I want everything to be perfect in paying for my work, but this is not always the case! Another question is if the conditions have changed during the execution of the task ....

I participated in one subscription where there was a condition to do no more than 15 shares and no more than 15 shares or posts were specified. In a word, I made 15 reposts and several posts. As a result, when I checked the results table, I had "0". In the Telegram, the manager said that it was possible to do only 12 reposts and 3 posts, and therefore I did not receive points as a punishment. I consider this decision unfair. I was not lazy, I did more, which means it was better for the project, but in the end I was underestimated. I do not consider that surplus is badly.

I was satisfied from signature campaign but long time ago i have never participated campaign now i would like to work for bounty campaigns and it is good to me because through this i can earn multiple coins and it has so many good projects in these days i want to make more coins in the market and then in future i have to use these for a good purpose.

For me, I am very satisfied with the signature campaign. because in my opinion, the highest payment in a bounty hunter is a signature. although indeed sometimes in participating in signature campaigns we must fulfill a large number of weekly posts. but that did not dampen my enthusiasm for participating in a signature campaign.

You see signature bounty campaigns have practically the highest rewards among other campaigns. That's why bounty managers make such strict rules for the participants. And I think it's rather fair because they limit the minimum amount of posts. That's the point. If you make less then minimum than you are out. Fully agree. But what they could really improve is the motivation to do more posts than required. For instance if you make twice as mush posts as the minimum number you will get more stakes etc. And limit the maximum reward as well. That will be really cool.

And that's very important to comply with the rules if you wanted to have your stake, allowing yourself to read those rules and making it sure that everything is being understood correctly so afterwards you will be able to enjoy your stake, though not everything around are good but you must find good bounty managers and projects that will not scam the project and will pay accordingly.

There are official rules for all bounty companies that everyone should follow! Why someone performs them and receives a reward, and who is not and also wants to receive a reward?
Before you accept the bounty terms, you all read them and agree to it - if you don't have personal time to write 10 messages a week - that's your problem.

What can say in this purpose because now a days Maximum bounties campaign is scams and they never paying payment. Last signature campaign my bounty project dead due to price declination.

The managers that do not give any reward because signature campaign participate make an incomplete post is doing the right think. Fortunately we have several bounty campaigns with their rules, just choice the one you are capable to work with. We even have campaigns that accept only five post per week.

I am satisfied about the signature campaigns in which I participated and I think they can come up with any rules they want since they are trying to make sure that the participants are posting for real and with interest.

Perhaps you have participated in the pool campaign too large, and the completion of the ICO. They felt that the participants were too few and the bonus tokens did not match the amount sold in the ICO. That's reason

This will never be the end of what you say. As a result, you express your opinion about stretching, but it is very clear that there is no limit to stretching. There are thousands of people who can exploit that.

You should understand the rules. For example if you join a game there is also a rules that you should follow, if you did not meet that rules you loose. Its just like on signature campaign, we shoukd follow their rules to earn a reward.  Read first their rules and understand.

In my opinion, you should follow the conditions of participation in the signature campaign without question. If you do not agree with this, then perhaps this work is not for you. But this applies only to the bounty of honest managers. If the conditions change constantly and in the middle of the week, it is possible that such a bounty Manager is simply not trustworthy.

It depends on each campaign because due to such market situation we are forced to deal with a lot of campaigns that are ending without any payment or with a dramatic budget reduces. Hope things will change soon.

Of course it is fair not to reward such people, because they did not fulfill the terms of the contract with the project, but how else is it possible? If we consider the picture in General, then the question arises - what if the company does not fulfill its promises to reward, change the conditions of participation in the bounty of the company? Here everyone acts as he thinks it is right, so the company should not be trusted.

Over the past 5 months I have not received payments from a single project, they are all moved to the middle - the end of December, and it must be borne in mind that the project will need additional time to get listed to the exchange. I am absolutely not satisfied.

We have to fulfill the requirements and if they are not met there will be no reward simple as that. If the requirement is weekly 10 posts it means, that is the minimum but you can write 11 or 12 posts for the case if some of your posts is deleted by the forum admin or the whole
tread could be deleted as well.

Legit question which bounty managers should consider.  :)

Best way to reward a signature bounty is also in my opinion giving stakes per post. Like in your example if someone has 9 posts, pay for 9 posts and if someone has 13 posts, pay for 13 posts. But set a maximal limit of 10 or 15 posts per week which are paid, this decision will avoid spam. Pay every post would in this limit would be very fair.  :)

This year, I am not satisfied with the profiit given as reward for the hardwork of the participants. The worse scenario is having no profit at all this year, from a bounty project due to project failure which is due to the influence of continuous market downfall thid year. Unlike last year, whereas profit are reasonable from bounty projects especiallh during the bullrun. But the case at this moment is way different.

In my own opinion, All of Bounty campaign has regulation and has participant we need to follow. Limiting their posts or has a maximum and minimum post to have a basis when they count their participants earning. Having a rules and regulation can be a way to have a piece  mind though we have diffrent opinion.

I have seen some bounty campaign managers who are very strict with this rules. A participant can even be short of one post yet still receive zero stake, whereas some may just overlook and award you the full stake. This is usually at the sole discretion of the bounty managers to either amend the rules along the line, or keep strictly to it.

This issue is in the hands of the bounty participant.
Making shit posts can can lead to that. Do it should be stopped.
Then create as many posts as possible, in order not to fall victim again.

If that's the rule, I mean that's the rule. You should just do it too avoid problems. Besides, every one of your post is paid so be diligent.

It depends to the signature campaign that you join. Because they have campaigns that good to join and not.
Calculate the reward that possible you get before you join to know if that is good or not.

I would agree with the rules. You have to make the quota or else they won't pay you. That's why you have all week or a lot of days before the cut off to make it. Word of advice, always make sure that you post more than enough of what is asked. The excess won't be rewarded but at least you're sure that you reached the required posts.

When we decide join in some bounty campaign, we should be agree with their rules. I think its fair bounty manager not giving a stake if we do not follow their rules. Rules should be obey because its about to spread the word on their project. So far, i am very satisfy with my reward

Not all projects that I follow always produce high and high values. Especially with the prices of the crypto market currently declining. It also has a significant impact on revenue from the signature campaign, tokens are more difficult to sell because the value drops dramatically after distribution or after the coins are listed on the stock. However, taking advantage of this situation is to collect coins from many signature campaigns by keeping them on promising coins, which will create huge revenue opportunities at high market prices.

If everybody is doing the same as doing the job just a few less sure this will give bad impact. rules and regulations still should remain applied to the bounty that is running. It's when these rules are tight then the bounty went well and certainly including bounty that will most likely be able to give more profit.

In every work conditions are very necessary things and bounty hunter's must be obeyed them and i am also satisfied with these rules. And if you can not fulfill conditions then it is not a good thing that you want reward for your uncompleted work.
According to me when any bounty project gives you to do task of writing 10 or 15 post in signature campaign, actually they will hire you to promote their project by writing quality post on forum. And if you does not fulfill the conditions and does not promote them properly, then they have right to disqualify you and also have rights to not given reward for your half work.
So i think conditions are good thing which gives us Induced to do our work properly.

Every bounty campaign has it's own share of every campaign. Sometimes , the Signature share is satisfactory and sometimes not. It all depends on project.

Every bounty has a rule and the rules must be followed strictly to allow the person to get a stake but I think it would be a good idea that bounty managers should award half stake to anyone that reaches half of the post for the week.

Now I often see that bounty managers write about what rewards will be given depending on the quality of the post. and increase the conditions for the number of characters. this is a good decision

Everyone have their opinion because we have different campaigns and ranks,
For me I didn't earn much from signature campaigns so I am not satisfied with it.

Is it so hard to write for 1 week  10 posts?I sometimes write and generally do not pay attention to how much I have in there posts.At the end of the week, just check that there was exactly the amount that is necessary for the calculation of rates.Don't be so petty and stingy.If bounty the Manager a normal the he'll count You and 9 posts,but if only ensure that in previous weeks you wrote more than 10 posts.I recently do not receive any payments from the subscription company,but nevertheless there are rules and if possible you must comply with them.

I think it's fair to either finish 80% or 70%. the bounty managers who make the rules and rules have the right to do if they want to be part of getting a prize if it's not like there will be lots of people out there who only finish 70% of their posts that are unfair compared to those who have 100%

there are rules of the signature campaign and participants must follow them. it's simple - you don't have enough posts then you don't receive your stakes for the week.

As with every given bounty campaign, you must be sure to read the rules carefully and abide by them. Most Bounty managers take their jobs seriously and may be very strict in their assessments of bounty tasks completed. Also, considering that most project allocate huge percentages to signature campaigns due to high prospects conversion , it is not uncommon to see them get stricter with the assessment of bounty signature campaigns. The advice is this, always ensure you fulfill the rules set aside on the bounty. If this is correctly done, then you will have no need to worry about your rewards.

To earn a reward or to be payed for  job done, you must adhere strictly to the whole rules and regulations guiding the job to be done, therefore rules relative to signature campaign must be adhere to the latter else there will be an abuse that will affect the essence of the campaign.

I like that rule and I support the fact that it is usually implemented because the rules are clearly stated that a certain number of posts are required and you wore the signature, bearing fully in mind that you would have to make that number of posts, so if you do not meet up with the number, you do not deserve the points.

A few manager do that, but mostly manager does not tolerate people who do not complete his target post within 1 week. For him, they are too lazy to write. In altcoin sign camp, I only see a maximum of 20 posts a week, but currently only 15 are the most. I don't know what they did, so making 15 posts in 1 week was so difficult, even though if they made 3 posts in a day it would be done in 5 days, that must be easy.

Bounty campaigns should serve as a springboard for earning start-up capital and further trading on stock exchanges.
The signature campaign is the only campaign where I am currently participating. And any amount of earnings can not be compared with income from trading on exchanges.

I'm comfortable on the rewards system because it is not really hard to reach 15 posts a week, it's just about time management I'm also had a 6 to 5 works and very limited time online, but it's really not hard to do that task, and this is their rules and they want it simplified and do not want calculations because you did not reach your quota.

Signature campaigns are among the easiest and most rewarding bounty tasks. Since the rules are there, I expect everyone to follow the rules.

It depends to the requirements of the campaign and how much you get you can think thay if that is enough or not.
RemeRemember depends also to your rank and weeks that you join in the campaign.

This is the first time I saw this kind of recommendation, because 15 post a week that is just two post daily is not that really hard if you are serious in your bounty campaign, the only problem that we have to concern with is the success of the campaign that we are promoting, or we will not get a reward if it fail.

If you first study the project and only after start taking part in it, then you will be satisfied. Of course this does not always work, but in most cases it really works.

i think there is no issues with the signature campaign terms and conditions and stakes rewards system as the conditions are not strict that one can not adhere to. if you divide the posts to be made within a week, you will observe that you are supposed to make an average of two comments a day which is not a difficult task.

If they pay people who don't follow the rules, it's actually stealing from those who DID follow the rules. If I'm in a bounty campaign I always make sure I make my quota of 10 posts. I post 2 times a day Monday through Friday and 1 time on Saturday and Sunday.

It is just a simple rule to follow, it is like a terms and agreement that you will need to comply in order to get what you want, follow the rules and you will get rewarded, I think there is no reason to specially treat signature bounty hunters the way you think.

The rewarding now of signature campaign now is not satisfying , this is because of the market falldown of price now ,and the bounty campaign are still extending their signature campaign ,this is because the ICO of the various  campaign project ,did not meet the targetted softcap and hardcap , so in other side it can not gave the proper  value of token during the rewarding of tokens because of the low value of the market.

I think I'm trying to understand you want those managers to be considerate that at least there could be a reason why some people could not totally make the number of post requred and if they tried to a meaningful percent, their effort should not be a waste.
Well, that's a goof reasoning. It is painful to lose reward after a good effort, but unfortunately a little effort is not what is rewarded here, it is total obedience that is needed. Nothing more, nothing less.

At the moment I also experienced that when you work too much but not meet the requirements, I feel sad. The stakes are not counted and the entire week I felt is wasted. Maybe for a solution to this, I should be more responsible and put more efforts and time to my works.

All returned to the rules made by the Bounty manager and if they violated they would certainly not get shares. I also often find that participants do not reach the weekly post target, but still get shares. I think there are some managers who are very strict and there are managers who are not too strict.

Yes, all goes to the bounty manager's decision. But really? Just making 15 post in the bitcointalk thread isn't that hard to work for an entire week. Each post will only cost you 0.5 - 2 minutes and you have 10,080 minutes in a week.

By registering with the signature company you automatically agree to the conditions set forth by the organizer of the bounty .. if 10 posts are written, 10, not 7, not 12, but 10 will be counted ... is this fair? of course fair

It should make 10/15 posts every week, I don't think it will be difficult and of course, it can be achieved. But that also depends on the Bounty manager because sometimes this spreadsheet is not actively updated every week. So maybe when updated by the Bounty manager there were a number of posts that had been deleted.

quite satisfied with the current campaign. any existing rules show that the campaign necessarily wants maximum results also from the level of the bounty hunter. when bargaining for lightening the thing I think is reasonable. so of course if not pleased with existing rules could leave the campaign only and creates its own rules.

I think if the rules already been decided form the start, then there is no problem with that, cause joining the project with that rule applied means we already agree with the rules.
And it would be different story if the rules were changed at the middle or at the end of the campaign that cause the participant to loose their chance to get any reward.

yeah, that's why i think it would be better if we exceed 1 to 2 posts from the limit determined by the bounty manager.
so that we do not lose the stake if at any time our post disappears one.

In my opinion, it would be more fair to pay a signature campaign for each publication without taking into account the required number of posts. However, if the requirements of the mandatory presence of 10 or 15 posts per week are set by the employer, then they must be met.

there are cases in the past where bounty participants are allowed to make more post in subsequent week to make up for his/her post but that does not happen again. They realize how competitive this is now and are ready to stick with rule no matter the condition. I appreciate also that the bounty managers dont pick post from one's profile and deduct from previous recorded but count post per week on ones profile. most cases post are deleted and this always affect the post counted every week.

The results of each ICO that has been followed vary. Valuable results can usually be obtained from ICO who are also qualified. Many of the ICO only produce a small amount and the price decreases quickly when it has been distributed to participants and investors. For ICO results, current prices tend to be small because the market price factor also decreases. Be careful when choosing ICO, many fail in the middle of the road, and many of them are also scams.

I think it's fair! Why? because before starting and registering with a company signature and doing it, you have read the rules and what to do to get the shares! well of course if you can't post as many rules as you won't get anything.

Of course, everything has been properly arranged and considered. Indeed, there must be positive and negative. If we experience such a problem, I'd better ask directly to the gift manager. If we have reported to the Bounty manager, it will definitely be followed up soon.

There were times, they were very pleased with the payments of subscription companies, but now there are only hopes for a cheerful and fruitful future!

Why do you make staff up? There're rules which are clear enough. Ofc, administrators often clean the forum, and some threads are deleted. That's why always do a bit more than you have to do.

in my opinion, stakes system or tokens that are paid weekly is good enough, but it's good that every manager gives relief to bounty hunters who don't make a post, for example, if the rule is 15 posts per week, but bounty hunters are only able to make 7 posts then their stake or token can be reduced by 50%

Good suggestion but i doubt it will be looked into.  Rules are rules and its often there to take advantage of those that break it even slightly. Rewarding a signature posts of 7/10 or 12/15 should be considered in my honest opinion. I think Its fair for both parties

I think that bounty managers shouls give half stakes or maybe more. People we working a lot and if they forgot about 1 post, it's not serious to give 0 stakes and wait the next week

I don't think so. The bounty manager will not give stakes if we cannot reach the target number of posts that are clearly written in the rules. If we have joined a bounty, that means we agree and must complete the rules well in order to get a stake. Therefore, before joining a bounty, make sure you understand the rules properly, adjust to your respective abilities.

The way to solve the lack of posts per week is to to do at least one extra post incase one of the threads you posted on gets deleted. This would otherwise result in you not meeting the requirements and therefore not receiving any stakes

Frankly, when I was a member the market was better and I was making good money from bounty campaigns but right now I can't earn money because ICO's are going very bad and by taking into consideration I am a full member right know

if you have been involved in this forum, of course you have to allow the requirements. if we are participating in signature campaign, it is like we are employing to someone and we have to allow and obey the rules. when we don't obey, we get nothing reward. however, if we obey the rule not in 100%, then the employer gives dispensation, it is worried that the employee will be underestimate to the rules and it will harm the business. it is a simple sample for answering the question.

I believe that such people need to count at least half of the reward as they, too, tried

if that happen case a will not get stake for a week, and case b still get reward stake, because the minimum post is reached.

if for example rules 15 posts every week, and only 13 posts, there will be no stakes. and posts that do not reach the stake will not be taken into account the following week. so you must always reach the target post, if you can increase it. for example if the rules are 15 posts, then posting 20 posts will be safer because there must be some posts that are considered less constructive. and if you reach all the stake, then you will get a reward with a value according to your rank, and in my opinion, it is very satisfying.

Cases like this I think have happened a lot and that happens in every different Bounty manager. But we also have to go back to the original rules and that must be done. Whatever Bounty managers do must be respected and supported because of what they do for all campaign participants. If we find an error, we must immediately notify the Bounty manager.

What you just need to do is to follow their rules, you are the one who joined at the first place, it is their regulation is needed to follow just easy as that, If you post the required post count, then expect to have a stake.

well we join signature campaign after we read and accept the rule that BM made.
if what they stated we should made 15 post per week so we should comply with the rule.
rule was made to be obeyed.

I think it is fair enough. Because the bounty hunters that are signing up on the signature campaign know the rules and the said rules has no compromise act. So they know the task that they are up to and know the consequence if they didn't follow the rules.

I'm not, signature campaign seems to be the hardest bounty campaign, the rules for signature campaign is too strict, but the rewards for signature bounty campaign still small, most bounty have allocation for  signature bounty campaign only equal to content campaign.

It depends on my participated Bounty campaigns but most of the bounty campaigns I participated is worth it. They give me a better amount of rewards that a particular participants would satisfy. So basically I just don't base my satisfaction in one campaign that I participated before that's why it is really depends on the bounty Hunter if he joined a better campaigns.

I think this will depend on how the ico or bounty campaign give its reward to bounty hunters. Because some of the ico projects gives reward in such way they give coins per week, in this case the allocated bounty pool for signature would never meet since they use coins per week in reward. Unlike stake per week would be given, it is better.

If you want to get good rewards from signature, you must increase your level. With my level I am always satisfied with my signature rewards.

For op, I know what do you feel bro, but what we can do, they make the rule, my tips if they ask 10 post give them a bonus by making 11 or 12 post, it can be a security to avoid deleted post.

There mixed satisfaction, because it all depends  on the kind of bounty campaign you are joining, sometimes you are satisfied, especially if the outcome of the project is good , there are also time that there is no satisfaction, especially if the project did not reach the softcap ,you are not rewarded according to what is due to you.

At least I was pleased with the awards of the projects in which I took part and they pleased me that this time we will see soon

There are conditions attached which you must fulfil. Some campaigns states clearly that if you make less than 10 quality posts per week it won't be counted, even if its 9 posts,it won't be counted for that week. However,  i believe even if the posts are not complete but provided the participants posts up to 80% is ok, that's fair enough.

I don't hate the rules of participating in bounty activities. What I hate is that after I have done all my work seriously, the bounty has become a scam.

      Yes, it is fair not to receive any stake, as long as you have not met the conditions and tasks imposed by that bounty campaign. If you go to the store and you want to buy a bread and you do not have half the amount, you will not get half a bread. The same applies to cryptocurrency. It is recommended even to write more messages than the number required by the project, so that the message thread can be deleted later, your message will disappear and you will have 9 messages again.

Of course not, as you can see the payments like tears and not like rewards

Exactly, we should follow the rules as stated in the campaigns. Good managers however do give benefits to those who are short by one posts for the week, but then you have to cover it up by making an extra post the following week, after all you are working as an advertiser for the project and have to complete the work if you need the payment / stakes.

I am not against the rules of bounty campaigns for as long as it is being stated in the announcement thread  before the campaign started. Also of the number of posts per week I am not against about it but the thing that I am questioning is that there are some campaigns that they said 15 constructive posts per week but they will start counting from.your end posts, the problem is even you reach 20 post it is not counted if they count it from the ending post tou had last time. Because sometimes our post was deleted.

Well, I think we can not impose their own rules in their game , they decide how best and how many messages they need , I think there is nothing difficult to follow the rules and you all will pay, of course it would be good if more projects paid in eth for the work

I agreed with what you said because rule are rules and they are not meant to be broken. However, it a glaring because most of the  bounty campaign manager usually post their rules and regulations openly. Although, we also have a situation where some bounty campaign manager dont post their rules openly and that I dont support.

Of course, the signature campaign in today's market conditions is becoming one of the most reliable and useful ways to generate income. But for this it is necessary to study and follow the rules of participation in order to avoid common mistakes and wasted time.

I won more than $300 in rewards through signing events, but the current bounty activity is too much fraud, making it difficult to get the profit you need by signing.

all the rules and payments promised by the campaign manager, everything is complete in the regulations, and if we are not paid for our work, maybe we are not in accordance with existing regulations

I am disappointed with the current bounty activities because they have almost become a scam and our hunters have become victims of scams.

This is unfortunately true. The pay for working in bounties is really low. I really thought i could earn more, but so far i have only been able to earn a few dollars. Whether the work really worth it, i doubt more and more.

It depends on the campaign rules and before you do the campaign the rules are clear. Although there are campaigns that gives pro rated rewards rules should still prevail.

The fact is that I work for a private owner in the Bounty company, no one respects. No member of the company’s ico team wants to recognize the full benefits that the Bounty Company brings to their project. Recently, more and more bounty companies are deceiving Bounty Hunters and cutting payments, and some do not want to pay anything at all.

Personally, I can say that the subscription gives a good additional income. I always try to connect the subscription then when it turns out. I try to write posts as much as I need and even more. And I recommend everyone to participate in the subscription as a very useful and informative company.

This condition is not only set for Signature campaigns alone but also facebook and twitter, remember bounty campaign is set up to promote the project and they need more exposure as long as possible, and if these is allow to shift the goal post for some people this will resulted in abuse because of those people that do farm accounts

I think we should comply with the terms and rules that have been implemented by the bounty manager. If the rules have to make 10 posts per week then you only make 9 posts that your mistakes do not comply with the applicable terms and rules.

I feel you guys .  nowadays the pay out for the campaigns are now getting lower and lower even though the owners already see that the cryptos are down . 

they should not lower the payouts at all with this market condition but if thats what they really want,  we cant do anything about their decision   .

 lets just be thankful instead of complaining because campaigns on this forum are far more better than doing a faucet or any other online jobs out there     .

it all depends on the regulations in a campaign, which are already listed in the tread bounty, usually if you post less, you certainly don't get stake, as far as I know.

If you want money from the signature campaign then you need to follow their rules,I am not against the minimum quota since their intention is to advertise something if you can't meet the requirements just leave that spot for someone else who can do that.Luckily I am in a campaign with good weekly rewards and highly satisfied. :)

It is our wish whether to join in Signature Campaign or not because before joining we will find out whether they allocated any budget to the signature campaign. Only people who satisfied with the allocation will join in those bounty Signature campaigns.

I really think this area is an excellent opportunity for work and regular income. Of course, for such a result, you must carefully study and follow the rules. But over time, everyone masters these rules and begins to receive income.

In the first place pal, as a bounty hunter we do search first about the ico campaign here through reading the WP/road map they have. Second before we join if you read their bounty thread there is a rules and condition which is to those participants who have interest to join they will accept it. Meaning, we agree on that rules they had, whatever post a week we need to comply into that particular requirements. If You fail, well we do nothing about it, due to its our fault because rules is a rules.

It depends upon the project we choose because some campaign will allocate a huge budget to the signature campaign based on the coins price. If you are satisfied with their allocation definitely we can make some good amount of coins if your rank is slightly higher.

You have to do exactly as they ask. If you can't reach the minimum number then you won't get a stake of the week. Your task is to complete the goal and if you only complete 75-90% it is still invalid

Yes that also applies on many signature campaigns that pays in btc  .  they set a rules where you must make a minimum post per week in order to get paid and if you dont reach it you wont recieve any payouts but in some cases a user actually reach the qouta , its just the threads or the post were deleted because mods do have a regular clean up  .  

Its good that some campaign managers understand it . they should have give us a chance  because sometimes that isnt our fault on why we have failed  .

Pparticipation in signature campaigns through the BOUNTYGURU platform is very best work. Few users, adequate conditions and high earnings. Now the number of bounty hunters has decreased and you can earn very good stacks even for 3-4 weeks of participation.

Some manager grading the spreadsheet everyday for them the deleted replies by the mods will not be problem since they can get post counted for that day,but most of them will choose weekly basis so you need to have more posts if you feel that you have posted in such threads which can be deleted by mods,I don't feel which is a hard thing to post more post than required amount of posts.

I`m not satisfied in my bounty reward this year because I cant saw a good project who are paying their participants with high reward even you did what is the task there.

When the prices are too low you only get very small amount when you convert your rewards into fiat, most of the bounty paid their participants with there tokens in 2018, but most of them don't have any real value yet so if you are waiting for good bounty then join only on the signature campaign with bitcoin payment.

But it's very difficult to get into such a campaign. They are mostly reserved for high ranks and require posts in Gambling section where I have completely no experience to make contributing comments. But rewards in such campaigns are awesome and if you can get into it you will always have a decent profit.
Most ICO projects have problems to reach softcap and this affects also bounty allocations in a bad way.

Each project has different allocation for Signature bounty, Signature payments are based on how many people joined in the particular Signature campaign. We should bother about the company and their roadmap before joining any bounty, Of course, in the beginning, it is impossible of ICO it is impossible to find the potential project but there some basic step to find the good project.

According to the current market conditions, signature revenues are very low. In fact, many projects are not listed on the stock exchange. Currently the bounty tokens are waiting in the wallets

The whole crypto market is down, so most rewards from bounties aren't good with the actual market situation. I like joining the signature bounty because it is usually more profitable than any other campaign (except the translation campaigns), but we should wait a little bit more until the prices go up again.

To be honest, I'm not very happy with the latest bounty companies, since the problem of most companies is that there are a lot of participants and a small pool, but the most important problem is that most of the projects turn out to be a scam and this is the most offensive.

I don't see any relevance about what OP's question, though you said it right most of the bounties right now are turning to scam and that's the
hard part of being a bounty hunter, moving back to OP's concern, the rules has been stated and participants needs to comply with such rules
if you failed the previous week, you need to do much better in the following, some campaigners are considerable and might allow you but most
are not so you have to follow the rules..

I consider this a very good topic, because even though I often follow the signature of the gift, until now I have never experienced an event until everything is not in accordance with the rules.

but there is indeed a good thing if, what you say can be a concern of the gift manager, because it could be when doing the post is in accordance with the provisions, but when there is an inspection there is a post that is deleted, then it will not comply with the rules even though we were previously make it based on rules.

indeed there must be consideration for what has been done, because when doing it right. at least there is its own calculation rather than not giving any value.

You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in  the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.

The trend is changing for bounty hunters, we now need to do our DD to get a reliable project. There are a lot of ICOs coming out daily but how do we get a project that will get on exchanges and make some profits for the hunter. We need to think we are equally investors, investing time in advertising a project. Reading whitepaper does give us a better detail of project nowadays, the teams are better with that. Lets consider more of the products and partners, like some exchanges do before accepting IEO.

The logic that you give to the question that is asked is indeed acceptable, but there is no harm in expressing it like the colleague above.
because I have experienced the reality of what the partners questioned above, when one time I followed the signature because I could not complete the post according to the rules that had been made.
whether it was because of the kindness of the manager's bounty at that time, I also did not know but the fact that the manager bounty only gave a number of posts that did not match the amount but still gave value, even though it was not full.
only the number of posts at that time was shared with the conditions.
So actually back to the manager bounty too.

It is your wish whether to join those campaigns because if you don't like the allocation better don't join those campaigns. Not only look for allocation but also check the potential about the project which you are working, if you get the coins is not enough the company should start developing otherwise those coin will surely will not help you to make money.

I've seen some campaign managers that occasionally give rewards even they don't reach the required posts. But for me, they really shouldn't receive any at all. Rules are rules and it's very easy to reach the quota in 2-3 days because some of the guidelines are very lenient. And if you don't like that then you should not apply in the first place and demand things you are not forced to accept.

Some.bounty campaigns are not accepting those who dont meet the required post per week while some bounty managers if you do not meet the required post each you will still be given stakes but it will be lessen.

Most likely you will not get a payment, usually bounty manager will use the rules as a basic so they will ignore any complaint form anyone who is not reach minimal post per week.

For another case, I like the concept pay per post but most of this concept has been done by signature campaign who pay participants with bitcoin, I don't see any bounty managers ICO who do this concept.

If you are the manager , you are strict  .  while other managers will still give a chance to their participants if ever they missed some post because there are many reasons that can affect the post count of a user  . it maybe get deleted by mods , the user might be busy , the user reach the qouta but some post are on different boards  . etc   ,  thats why we must give them a second chance  if they still fail thats the time that you will removed them  or not pay them .

I wanna ask if youre always reading the rules before joining in a bounty campaign. It is so clear that if you do not reach the required  post within a week you wont get any stakes, and 2 conseccutive weeks will result into elimination in some bounty.

Signature campaign, is same goes like you are applying for a job in a company and its just temporarily only, but the payment is very rewarding depending on the rank you're applying for. And having a rules was a normal things I guess. So, as a bounty hunter we have no right to complaint, because before you submit your application there's a rules that you need to accept if you want to be a part of promoting the project then if you don't like the rules you can ignore and don't try to attempt to participate anyway.

I regularly recommend my friends to participate in various reliable signature campaigns. Because work in this direction really provides attractive opportunities for generating income and achieving success. But for such a result, it is necessary to study the rules and requirements of a particular project.

Signature campaigns in service sections changed a lot,more managers prefer paying to number of posts people creating rather than setting a weekly target and ask the people to make to get rewards so if you want that then join on btc signature campaigns.

15 post a week is not that hard to do, that's only 2 posts a day with only one day where you are going to post three if you cannot follow an easy and simple rule then better not participate in a signature campaign, 15 post to me is fair if they ask 30 to 40 then we can ask for percentage of the stakes.

15 post is the lowest max post for any sig campaigns including the ones that pays on bitcoin and etherium   . other campaigns are more harder than this because their target qouta per week is 25 to 35 post  .  while other campaigns have a max 60 post per week  , higher than this are consider inapropriate anymore as they can cause a massive spam to the forum  . right now im a campaign that pays good and im going to say that im satisfied with it .

It's a hassle if there is a fixed amount more than 10, I would not join any of the altcoin signature campaign if they require to post atleast 15 per week because I may have been away and would not able to continue. However, I think good managers do some care sometimes.

15 posts a weeks is pretty easy if you really an active forum member, but it's hard if you are just looking for monry through bounty campaigns. By making 3 posts a day, you are able to complete your tasks, is that too hard? I have ever managed a bounty campaign and when my participant can't complete minimum amount of post, usually I will ask them to create more posts next week (In case they only created 9 posts this week while the minimum is 10 posts, I will credit them stakes for this week. Then next week they need to create minimum 11 posts to be able to get stakes)

This kind of rules should ease the campaign proccess, and need to be implemented for all campaign so that participants be able to earn what they should earn and also a project doesn't lose their influencers.

If you are refering active forum member, I think no one continuously post, at least not those member who are here for learning. Only people who are earning post daily, this is why 15 posts is quite high for me.

Being too strict sometimes would really give out some negative impressions as you as a manager.Im impress on how other managers do have consideration into their participants but as a bounty hunter
complying rules or just following it is a really must thing for you not to be able to experience problems or lost of stakes. Rewards would vary yet each project would be entirely different and when it comes to price
it vary on the projects potential.

We have to follow their rules otherwise, they will not give any stakes but recently we have seen many companies are not allocating huge amounts to the Signature Campaign, because now many people are spreading the word but most of the people are spamming the forum based on this managers are closely watching people who are spread the word by wearing the signature. It is our wish whether to join the campaign or not.

For now maybe only content campaign which can almost have same allocation with signature. But sometime it filled a lot because people can easy to make blog post. There are no choice for us maybe if some signature campaign have limit participants, will be good.

There are considerable managers that are still giving rewards or stakes and payment to those nearly hitting the minimum quota. But some conditions that the payment isn't full, it may be in half or 1/4 depends on the managers assessment. From the very beginning, those rules are already there and as participant you should obey to the campaign's rule. It isn't hard to follow, you just have to obey, and don't do anything against the rule of that campaign.

That's because people won't get any motivation from weekly minimum post rules. Based on my research from bounty hunters, there are a lot people doing their task in just 3 days (just to  meet the rules so that they are deserve to get the whole week stakes) and the in the rest days they are not active in the forum. Paid per post bounty gives much motivation to the participant since the more active they are, the more rewards they can earn.

In fact, there are excellent opportunities to quickly and easily receive a stable income. But before starting work with any signature campaign, you must carefully study the rules and requirements of a specific project in order to avoid common mistakes.

Well it all depends on the Campaign Rules, Managers and of course the "Rate". The higher the rate the stricter the rules are.
We're talking about money and employment here and we are all bound by the rules. "If you can't abide by our rules, we'll find someone who can".

However, some campaigns does not have that stricter rules, I've seen someone not reaching the required post and yet he got paid and the CM doesn't terminated him. Some campaign managers give you chance to amend your shortcomings and some don't.

Just to be safe, follow every rules the campaign set for you to follow.

There is no stable income from signature campaigns,the campaign manager or the project team chan change their terms at any time and do you think signature campaigns will last long?

Hey guys, I suggest you take part in a cool bounty from the Gexan project!
NO KYC! Payments monthly! The GEX coin is being traded on the exchange!
Bounty started yesterday and will run until June 30th.
May 10, 2019 Gexan project will hold IEO on the exchange, which is included in the top 25 Coinmarketcap. Thus, by the end of the award, the GEX coin will be sold on exchanges.
This is a very cool offer!
Sign up for a reward in the bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136521
link to ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136520
Web-wallet Gexan: http://lottery.gexan.io/
Web site: http://gexan.io/

Nowadays the numbers of promising signature campaigns is really limited, and the reward in BTC is very small, there are only the bounty signature campaigns which pay with their tokens, and you have to wait a long time until the token gets listed in exchanges, and until it hits the good price.

Why are you spamming everywhere? I saw your post history and found you spamming with this same message in a lot of topic. Isn't it enough to create the bounty thread only?

I think you are just lazy. It's just like a regular job that you have to reach a certain quota everyday because if not then the business or the owner will get bankrupt so you better make good sales or else you'll lose your job. I believe that this is just fair for their part and our part. You should do 16 or more in case the moderators delete it.

Do what  is on the rules. There will be no problem if you meet the post per week.  Its your job to make the required post per week ,you have 7 days to do your work.

Right, it is already fixed that we must follow what bounty manager say. If we get deleted post, it means our post not good or if thread which deleted, we must be careful when pick a thread. It is actually simple.

Rules should be followed, you did participated from the campaign so it's your job to meet the expectations of the bounty managers, you have to do your best meeting everything that inside the rules and it's the job the managers to check and see if you passed the qualifications and rewards you from what you deserved, if the bounty managers is strict from it's rule he will not pay you up but if the manager is a considerate person he will give you rewards then ask you to fill your lapses in the rounds.

That's right, bro, I agree with your opinion, bro, because we have to be careful in commenting because the signature campaign is very strict, we must obey the regulations...

Because we like an employee, bounty manager is our leader which help us and actually do big thing for us. So it will be good if we follow their rules and not violate it as long both us and bounty manager is get good thing for that.

But it should not be. We everyone here (at least the main reason) for learning. I may post sometimes while sometimes I may post 1. Chipmixer is the campaign which pays for 1 post too. If you post only one, you will still get the payment.

Not only chipmixer and bitvest but there are also few number of campaigns out there that are paying per post .  some have a minimum limit while others dont have  . if you are a campaign that has a pay per post structure and does not have any minimum limit then thats good because you wont feel pressure  . you can post as little as one post but that wont be rewarding at all but thats okay if  that can make you feel satisfied .

like chipmixer campaign need good person and quality poster. they are welcome for staff and administrator here without selection. for participant need high quality and good knowledge as bitcointalk member

Campaign managed by Hhampuz are required to have a minimum of 15 posts for reaching payout, but in Chipmixer, if you post only 1, you will still get the rewards, that's what I meant. There's no other campaign like Chipmixer. Everyone requires to have a minimum number of posts.

They are doing that to encourage members to be active, the company is expecting a good return of what they are paying on a weekly basis, so their budget has to be maximize and that will help more exposure of their project in the forum.