Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[axel2078]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You have to do exactly as they ask. If you can't reach the minimum number then you won't get a stake of the week. Your task is to complete the goal and if you only complete 75-90% it is still invalid

[1715201655]

1715201655

[1715201655]

1715201655

[1715201655]

1715201655

[1715201655]

1715201655

[imstillthebest]

,

You have to do exactly as they ask. If you can't reach the minimum number then you won't get a stake of the week. Your task is to complete the goal and if you only complete 75-90% it is still invalid

Yes that also applies on many signature campaigns that pays in btc  .  they set a rules where you must make a minimum post per week in order to get paid and if you dont reach it you wont recieve any payouts but in some cases a user actually reach the qouta , its just the threads or the post were deleted because mods do have a regular clean up  .  

Its good that some campaign managers understand it . they should have give us a chance  because sometimes that isnt our fault on why we have failed  .

[krassy]

Pparticipation in signature campaigns through the BOUNTYGURU platform is very best work. Few users, adequate conditions and high earnings. Now the number of bounty hunters has decreased and you can earn very good stacks even for 3-4 weeks of participation.

[jrrsparkles]

,

You have to do exactly as they ask. If you can't reach the minimum number then you won't get a stake of the week. Your task is to complete the goal and if you only complete 75-90% it is still invalid

Yes that also applies on many signature campaigns that pays in btc  .  they set a rules where you must make a minimum post per week in order to get paid and if you dont reach it you wont recieve any payouts but in some cases a user actually reach the qouta , its just the threads or the post were deleted because mods do have a regular clean up  .  

Its good that some campaign managers understand it . they should have give us a chance  because sometimes that isnt our fault on why we have failed  .

Some manager grading the spreadsheet everyday for them the deleted replies by the mods will not be problem since they can get post counted for that day,but most of them will choose weekly basis so you need to have more posts if you feel that you have posted in such threads which can be deleted by mods,I don't feel which is a hard thing to post more post than required amount of posts.

[jemarie20]

I`m not satisfied in my bounty reward this year because I cant saw a good project who are paying their participants with high reward even you did what is the task there.

[semobo]

I`m not satisfied in my bounty reward this year because I cant saw a good project who are paying their participants with high reward even you did what is the task there.

When the prices are too low you only get very small amount when you convert your rewards into fiat, most of the bounty paid their participants with there tokens in 2018, but most of them don't have any real value yet so if you are waiting for good bounty then join only on the signature campaign with bitcoin payment.

[chenille]

I`m not satisfied in my bounty reward this year because I cant saw a good project who are paying their participants with high reward even you did what is the task there.

When the prices are too low you only get very small amount when you convert your rewards into fiat, most of the bounty paid their participants with there tokens in 2018, but most of them don't have any real value yet so if you are waiting for good bounty then join only on the signature campaign with bitcoin payment.

But it's very difficult to get into such a campaign. They are mostly reserved for high ranks and require posts in Gambling section where I have completely no experience to make contributing comments. But rewards in such campaigns are awesome and if you can get into it you will always have a decent profit.
Most ICO projects have problems to reach softcap and this affects also bounty allocations in a bad way.

[miningguru]

Each project has different allocation for Signature bounty, Signature payments are based on how many people joined in the particular Signature campaign. We should bother about the company and their roadmap before joining any bounty, Of course, in the beginning, it is impossible of ICO it is impossible to find the potential project but there some basic step to find the good project.

[hidrocop]

According to the current market conditions, signature revenues are very low. In fact, many projects are not listed on the stock exchange. Currently the bounty tokens are waiting in the wallets

[djkyno]

The whole crypto market is down, so most rewards from bounties aren't good with the actual market situation. I like joining the signature bounty because it is usually more profitable than any other campaign (except the translation campaigns), but we should wait a little bit more until the prices go up again.

[elitemobb]

To be honest, I'm not very happy with the latest bounty companies, since the problem of most companies is that there are a lot of participants and a small pool, but the most important problem is that most of the projects turn out to be a scam and this is the most offensive.

[joshy23]

To be honest, I'm not very happy with the latest bounty companies, since the problem of most companies is that there are a lot of participants and a small pool, but the most important problem is that most of the projects turn out to be a scam and this is the most offensive.

I don't see any relevance about what OP's question, though you said it right most of the bounties right now are turning to scam and that's the
hard part of being a bounty hunter, moving back to OP's concern, the rules has been stated and participants needs to comply with such rules
if you failed the previous week, you need to do much better in the following, some campaigners are considerable and might allow you but most
are not so you have to follow the rules..

[lepbagong]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I consider this a very good topic, because even though I often follow the signature of the gift, until now I have never experienced an event until everything is not in accordance with the rules.

but there is indeed a good thing if, what you say can be a concern of the gift manager, because it could be when doing the post is in accordance with the provisions, but when there is an inspection there is a post that is deleted, then it will not comply with the rules even though we were previously make it based on rules.

indeed there must be consideration for what has been done, because when doing it right. at least there is its own calculation rather than not giving any value.

[Bunsomjelican]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in  the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.

[ololajulo]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

In the first place pal, as a bounty hunter we do search first about the ico campaign here through reading the WP/road map they have. Second before we join if you read their bounty thread there is a rules and condition which is to those participants who have interest to join they will accept it. Meaning, we agree on that rules they had, whatever post a week we need to comply into that particular requirements. If You fail, well we do nothing about it, due to its our fault because rules is a rules.

The trend is changing for bounty hunters, we now need to do our DD to get a reliable project. There are a lot of ICOs coming out daily but how do we get a project that will get on exchanges and make some profits for the hunter. We need to think we are equally investors, investing time in advertising a project. Reading whitepaper does give us a better detail of project nowadays, the teams are better with that. Lets consider more of the products and partners, like some exchanges do before accepting IEO.

[yohananaomi]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You've reached the rank of Sr. member and yet you are asking like novice dude. Okay, lets change the question do you think if you buy a ticket in  the airplane were the price cost 100$ and in your cash on hand is only 99$, will the cashier will allow you to give the ticket? Always remember that rules is a rule which is equivalent of constitution. So if you want to get the stakes, I guess you better comply it perfectly the task weekly, just very simple as that.

The logic that you give to the question that is asked is indeed acceptable, but there is no harm in expressing it like the colleague above.
because I have experienced the reality of what the partners questioned above, when one time I followed the signature because I could not complete the post according to the rules that had been made.
whether it was because of the kindness of the manager's bounty at that time, I also did not know but the fact that the manager bounty only gave a number of posts that did not match the amount but still gave value, even though it was not full.
only the number of posts at that time was shared with the conditions.
So actually back to the manager bounty too.

[btcmegastar]

To be honest, I'm not very happy with the latest bounty companies, since the problem of most companies is that there are a lot of participants and a small pool, but the most important problem is that most of the projects turn out to be a scam and this is the most offensive.

It is your wish whether to join those campaigns because if you don't like the allocation better don't join those campaigns. Not only look for allocation but also check the potential about the project which you are working, if you get the coins is not enough the company should start developing otherwise those coin will surely will not help you to make money.

[Arkham Knight]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I've seen some campaign managers that occasionally give rewards even they don't reach the required posts. But for me, they really shouldn't receive any at all. Rules are rules and it's very easy to reach the quota in 2-3 days because some of the guidelines are very lenient. And if you don't like that then you should not apply in the first place and demand things you are not forced to accept.

[superving]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Some.bounty campaigns are not accepting those who dont meet the required post per week while some bounty managers if you do not meet the required post each you will still be given stakes but it will be lessen.

[Ridwan Fauzi]

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Most likely you will not get a payment, usually bounty manager will use the rules as a basic so they will ignore any complaint form anyone who is not reach minimal post per week.

For another case, I like the concept pay per post but most of this concept has been done by signature campaign who pay participants with bitcoin, I don't see any bounty managers ICO who do this concept.