Bitcoin Forum

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions? ??? ??? ??? ???

I don’t like Solana’s wallet a little bit. It feels a little strange. It may also be because I’m not used to it.

You can choose both if you can afford short term losses. Both MATIC and SOLANA are overvalued and even they are corrected in past two months. They are still overvalued.

If you can not afford short term loses if the market becomes very bad for altcoins. If you feel you can not hold and have to exit because the market is bad in a few months, these coins are not for you.

In fact, in my opinion the two coins / blockchains are equivalent, let's say that on a personal level I prefer matic perhaps because it is easier to use the dapp / defi to put them in stake or liquidity

I'm much more interested in polygon Matic than Solana, many DEX platforms have adopted matic network. In my opinion, the price of matic is still very cheap, it's really worth it to buy.

I would really support Matic over Solana right now. This is primarily because Matic blockchain is also listed on Opensea, which makes it have high volume of people visiting it and a better marketplace than most other emerging NFT marketplaces. Of course, if Opensea supports minting the NFTs on Solana, i would probably have to re-evaluate my thoughts.

Solana is my favorite. SOL has its own distinct qualities. Low transaction costs while assuring scalability and quick processing are the aims of this system. Proof-of-history (PoH) consensus is one of the most important improvements that Solana brings to the table. The most significant feature is that when a BTC correction happens, it rebonds extremely rapidly.

I think Matic has the slight edge in that it has a more burgeoning community which drives more adoption

These two altcoins are not similar to any other shitcoin in market which do not have any utility or development team to support them but have emerged as one of the top cryptos this year.On one side Solana which have broken the blockchain trilemma and can process 50k tps with low fees and faster confirmation based on POH and many dapps being built over this platform surely stand a firm future for those who believe in it.

Not sure about solana but Im well equipped on the matic ecosystem. Its an easy blockchain that can be connect using your metamask. Same goes to other blockchain, when it comes to nft. I think ethereum network still wins the race for example axie infinity resides on the eth network.

I dont like solana due to its very hard blockchain set up. But I know how to usef it. Its just that I am more comfortable with the metamask easy configure blockchain.

The Sollet wallet is not at all intuitive. There are too many hoops to obtain there token.

You need to pay for something as trivial as adding a token to your wallet.

Most of it has been pre-mined and distributed to proxies of exchanges and the initial holders. So much so that 0.22% of all addresses hold over 90% of the circulating supply. It is abysmally centralized and the founders have just taken advantage of the bull-run to market themselves.

I for one, would never really put any money into something like this. Yeah, if you can earn it for free by building something, you should go ahead as they are well documented at least.

MATIC, Well, the same situation here too. Just riding on the wave of L2 adoption by certain projects. As ETH goes to PoS, it won't need L2 and MATIC would basically become redundant. In the short term though, the upside can come from any bull run till Ethereum shifts to PoS.

Until the number of shards in the Ethereum 2.0 network grows to the required number, Level 2 solutions such as MATIC will be popular and useful for several years.

At the moment, I think Solana is very overvalued, so I am not investing in it. This coin gave its owners huge profits.

Solana's wallet like Sollet.io seems good to me because i have been using this wallet for few months and participated in few IDOs also. I haven't faced any problem. Although it needs more improvements.


 
I also think Solana is overvalued in comparison to Matic. Matic's will be more popular in the next few years. I have both Matic an SOL but i prefer SOL.

I prefer MATIC, because I believe that MATIC will be more popular than Solana in the future, so the price of MATIC can increase higher than the price of Solana, therefore if you ask me it's better to invest in MATIC or Solana, then I will definitely prefer to invest in MATIC, because I believe if MATIC can give me a lot of profit than Solana in the future.

FTX as a platform growing big over the year, acquired FTX-TSM (esports team)..naming the stadium into their own name (FTX-ARENA)...pouring donation into elected US president etc..
So their own product will stay or even become bigger in the future, SOL was their blockchain for "smart contract"..so as long FTX grows...their own product will also grow.

I might be biased because I even doesn't know what matic do (L2, cheaper fee on farm etc).

I like more matic, with simple ecosystem but powerful inside, and also matic team still good until now, look at the price that increased day by the day, i believe it will be 5$ at the end of year. The price up indicated people like matic much than solana. I hope the matic team not lack of idea to develope their ecosystem, some of good coin lack of improvement, so people start to moveng and make market red on their coin, IMHO.

the development of the platform will follow what is popular in the market. and what the community is interested in. what happens in the crypto market is always like that. so future developers are sure to belong to a platform that really gets support from the market.
the more adoptions the better. and currently, both are in the same stage. but Polygon's popularity is probably bigger today than Solona's rising from the hype.

In comparison, I support MATIC more. It may also be because I pay less attention to Solana. But I was also a holder of SOL, but I did not hold it for a long time. Maybe in the future, I will invest a little bit.

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

In fact, POLYGON'S MATIC and Solana are both very good and it's hard to choose between them, but I tend to prefer MATIC a bit more because of the good growth in a year compared to Solana's growth in a year can be clearly seen through the following comparison:

https://i.imgur.com/MoDRkOW.jpg

Investing in both coins is good, but for me I prefer investing in Matic because of the good growth in a year as well because its price is low compared to Solana, so you can buy larger quantities at a lower price and store them for a long time.

My choice matic is much more efficient and easy to use just like bsc and eth where the addresses can be combined in different blockchains. while solona I don't really understand how it works and have never tried it.

Seriously? Ethereum TPS is very low compared on the 2 blockchains being discuss here. Ethereum can't handle big volume of transaction that's why this blockchain exist and its not a redundant if ever Ethereum manage to increase there TPS. This is competition not redundancy so this blockchains will exist and will continue to have user whatever happened to Ethereum.

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

of course  ， both cannt directly compare with ETH

long-term, Solana is better pick, IMO
Matic is a good project, that is here to stay, but influence will go down with Ethereum2.0 and PoS, and Solana has a complete ecosystem, that could thrive in the future

nevertheless, both are good, and should bring fine returns, as investment, do not take this as financial advise and do your own analysis

Thanks for your sharing the image ， but  the price is not a matter

Matic is cheap at its current rate, it is capable of going close to $2..ath was 2.65. You might want to stock them up for next run. Solana has reached its peak, it will go little higher..likely to make small jump in next run. I like their ecosystem and what they have achieved in small time frame.

Polygon and Solana, both are projects that have good fundamentals, they also have developers who are active in developing their products. Personally, I prefer to invest in Polygon because the price is still around $1 USD, while Solana has already reached $30 USD. $1 to $10 USD should be easier than $30 USD to $300 USD. DYOR

NEAR protocol is superior tech wise to both of those projects.

It's absolutely true that if you look at it long term, Solana will probably yield better returns. But anyway, we are talking about both coins being good and trying to figure out which one is better. At each moment there will be a different feeling before its change.

You may right about that but when it already had big community and then the improvement that will be happened in ethereum will not make these blockchain to be disappeared from the market.
That's the same when so many competitors of ethereum appeared in the past. it can always be an alternative solution for the scalability problem of ethereum. Ethereum may get improvement in the future but the implementation could always be different with the expectation. I still prefer matic over Solana.

I personally prefer and admire Matic, the reason is because I am amazed by the growth of these altcoins which are still included in the newly released Altcoins.
Indeed, the three Altcoins POLYGON'S MATIC or Solana are both good in my opinion and both have the potential to become the best altcoins. but I'm more inclined to only Matic.

solana and polygon both have a lot of real use cases. although i select polygon, because it’s super fast transaction speed it’s big advantages and lower cost fee in Etherum network and it’s multi chain supported blockchain. comparatively polygon is scalability than solana, and it’s high potential for the future.

I prefer optimism (L2 solution)
Transactions there are instant, the commission is 0.5 dollars and uniswap is already working on optimism
If you want you can test
https://help.uniswap.org/en/articles/5404230-how-to-connect-to-optimism
your wallet should be switched to network optimism
https://info.uniswap.org/#/optimism/

From what I researched, it seems that Solana is superior, because Solana is more worthy of being paired with BNB, and it looks like Solana stands longer than MATIC, I have also followed the development of both in the DeFi concept, and Solona has many successful projects, with many communities.

My preference would be MATIC over Solana simply because of experience and fast. Matic ecosystem is already rolling out cool DeFi and decentralized applications . It is way cheaper than Eth and it is a layer 2 scaling implementation on top of ETH.

well,

Matic and AVAX ,both are on fire 🚀

Instead of having so many options that you have to think about it, buy them all and keep it. MATIC and Solana are both names that have created a lot of buzz in recent times in the market. I see dapps moving to these platforms, and I also believe they are products that effectively solve the current problems in the market.

If we consider these projects in terms of investment, then I think it is better to choose the Solana ecosystem. But if you are interested in cross-chain platforms then check out Near Protocol. This project has a blockchain that is much more technological than these two projects you have cited as an example. Due to the lower capitalization and popularization in crypto masses, Near ecosystem can be entered not only as an investor of token, DeFi or NFT within the ecosystem, but also as a developer. Huge opportunities have been created for novice developers, which undoubtedly has a beneficial effect on the development of the ecosystem.

As you already said, both are great platforms in my opinion and both are definitely absolutely top projects in the crypto space, but i am usually a guy that buys and holds for at least a year so my focus is on long term projects and with that in mind i would choose solana if i had too between the two options that you gave. The reason for that is simple. Polygon is "just" a layer 2 solution for ethereum and with that they had a huge success in the last few months because of the high transaction fees that we were seeing a lot of times on the ethereum network and even now with realtively low gas fees we still have to pay 15$ for a trade on uniswap which is just way to much.
As long as this continues, polygon will continue to thrive but as soon as Ethereum 2.0 hits and is working i think there is not much demand anymore for projects like polygon.

To be sincere, both are very good in what they offers and thus I think it might be hard pointing out which is better or not, also to add, both are still developing their ecosystem thus still have a long way to go.
But currently Solana is already making huge moves which has seen the price create another ATH, not only that, Solana have a way of supporting good projects on its blockchain such that the more they grow and develop, the more Solana grows as well, hence one of the reasons that a growth in Solana pulls other coins along.
Polygon is also making huge impact but Solana seems to be a bit ahead of it, Polygon can also be seen to be contending with Binance Smart Chain since some projects are already migrating to it, therefore the more projects migrates to it, the more it grows.
However, if I am to choose one from them, I would go for Solana.

Solana is more aggressive than matic for me in my opinion wherein if we will make a comparison, indeed i never see that matic token really improve alot during the uptrend in the market wherein only solana , cardano and xrp has the highlights even nowadays when it comes altcoin to be honest, infact they're making new all time high value along with bitcoin and ethereum for you information mate, so if i will choose which one is good probably for now it's solana.

Solana and matic both are good coins. They are also good for holding or investment. But polygon network is more popular then the solana network. There are many NFT projects that builds on polygon block chain. It is still available in very cheap price. I think its time  to buy polygon coin for long term.

In my opinion, i love both Solana and POLYGON's Matic. But if i have to choose between those 2, i will choose Solana of course. They reallllyy have a great project and Tokens! I saw most of the airdrops are Solana and then NFT. You need to try Solana, the web wallet is simple though, that's why i liked it :D

Well that's the main point in this regard, low cost and fast speed make their current appeal. But honestly, these projects are all solving a lot of the problems of the crypto market as well as blockchain solutions. And that's why we care and talk a lot about it.

For now, it's easier interacting with polygon wallet than solana for newbies or OGs not use to it. I farm on both ecosytem. I love polygon bridge from BSC and to. Although Sol ecosystem has given free money just like ERC20. Just use both ecosystem. I believe DOT and ADA ecosytem will defeat both Poly and SoL.

I prefer to buy both Matic and Solana because I see those project have a chance to become bigger in the future.
But if you do not have much money to invest in Matic and Solana, maybe you can buy Matic as the price is not too expensive compare to Solana so at least, you can expect to make a profit in the future.
But no matter what coin you want to buy, do not forget to analyze and check the project before decide to invest in Matic or Solana so you do not regret in the future.

To start, you should decide whether you’re in it for the long or short run. If long run, I’d get both, equally split. Or better yet, add 70% Sol and put 30% into matic.
Matic can prove good contract coin but recent hack produces some fear in market.

Its just my opinion, polygon is better because it already have the projects like NFT, with solana I don't really know but polygon has now become great alternative for ethereum thats always being said to be a lot costly compared to something like polygon or bsc. but with solana, its doing well with its price and already above polygon.

Personally since am coming from the ETH side I will say in terms of usage and UI that we mostly are used to Polygon is mostly the first choice but been fast and having more price action with lots of projects Solana wins that race. Just because I don't like Sol like everyone else doesn't mean it isn't a worthy competitor..but still I will pick polygon because am used to it

BNB is about to spike in the next few months. And playing NFT games running on BSC will be painful if BNB will hit 3000usd soon. The gas fee might become 4usd or higher. We can see more NFT games and utility to shift Solana or Polygon when it happened.

I haven’t tried Solana yet, so I can give my opinion only about Polygon. I consider this sidechain to be revolutionary because of its cheapness and speed of development and scalability. Mostly I invested in defi-projects on Polygon such as platforms for staking and yield farming. Also I have seen some NFT-games on Polygon. On the other hand, I haven’t tried NFT-platforms on Polygon, but Matic is involved in NFTI (NFT index), so I consider it to be in hype now.

Yeah, I agree with you, Polygon it's much user-friendly especially for some newcomer since it's basically an another Ethereum, Much easier to interact with it but Solana it's really good too with high TPS and lot of benefits too. Also i'm not sure about Polkadot maybe it just going to stay there as an another alternative but for ADA it's going to be huge for sure!

for the price it is true MATIC has a lower price. but solana also has a platform and often holds giveaway events that have fantastic value tokens. for the price problem, it depends on people who want to choose low-priced tokens, they can go to MATIC, if they want more expensive tokens, they can go to Solana.

ADA indeed is gaining too much attention now. We might see more action within this project.

Much better to monitor those projects and if you have good spare that you can use for long term, buying those assets are more probably will bring you a decent amount of profits. Usages are the big factor when using an asset. Keep doing your research and see which is which that will generate good compensations.

Price is not a way to compare a coin's good move with its growing demand advantage. Now, supply between Sol and Matic is completely different. Both have a good foundation, while Matic has thrived before and Sol has exploded recently with the expansion of its ecosystem. In my opinion, Sol has the better fomo at this stage. But both would be good to hold long term

I choose Polygon over Solana.

To make money, leg buy tokens when the project is not yet undervalued.
The price of the token for investors is from 4 to 25 cents.
https://cryptorank.io/ico/solana
Most of the tokens are owned by large funds, so the price has not dropped since the major token sale in early 2021.
I recommend that you study tokenomics well before investing.

Polygon MATIC is a platform built for Ethereum scaling and infrastructure development,
Meanwhile, Solana SOL/USD is a project that relies on the permissionless functionality of blockchain technology for a decentralized financial (DeFi) solution.
Each of these projects has seen massive growth recently in terms of the value as well as the supply of their outstanding tokens.
I see both have seen a sharp increase in this month of August, and I believe it is good to invest in both.

I also prefer MATIC/Polygon for NFTs. All the smartcontracts and Dapps from ETH could be adjust to work on Polygon. The price to upload/mint NFT on polygon is 0.00001$ compared to $2-3 on Solana.
:)

yes you can bridge them but i dont think solana can do that  . their fees difference are also far from each other  . polygon is just bigger than solana in terms of support but not in value  .
 however solana is gaining a momentum right now , we never know what if solana has a better plans in the future that can outsmart other competitors . lets see

Two crypto assets that are currently popular, between these two assets I prefer Solana, maybe there will be some people who don't argue but Solana's current development shows a good graph, maybe now is not the right time to buy it because it is going up, wait for the price be a little cheaper to start buying it.

Polygon is an Ethereum's side chain, as a result I trust it more than a separate, new for this market Solana. I think that both of them have good prospects. But Solana has bigger potential I think, as when Ethereum 2.0. launches, layers two will become less popular I think. Anyway, I don't want to focus on any of them, I invest both in Solana and Matic.

Polygon can provide low transaction fee because the token price is still cheap, if the token price is getting more expensive, the cost will also increase.
In my opinion, Solana is better because the network is different from the others, and provides its own uniqueness, therefore the demand is higher.

Ethereum 2.0 launches, but the problem is still there. It cants help to reduce the fees, still, transactions in Ethereum are very costly. So the demand for sidechain networks increasing. Polygon and Binance chain both solving this high transaction fees problem. People also showing good interest in those coins. So why is price also increasing, Matic is still undervalued. I believe we can easily see $3 within a few months.

at the moment these two assets are becoming quite a good thing because indeed these two coins are now in a good adoption trend at least for now.
apart from the best between solana and matic itself, I think both of them are quite good in several ways, indeed all of them have their own advantages and disadvantages.
such as matic with its price which is still very cheap and solana which is currently at the top thanks to the extraordinary increase a few weeks ago.
apart from that I think both are very good for now

there is no doubt about the development of these two coins
polygon matic and solana.
solana made such a great development that the price of solana increased, it was due to the smart contract solana
has begun to be built which provides optimism for developments that will be much better in the future.
polygon matic also made an extraordinary breakthrough, which took advantage of the boom in NFT they were also in it
by offering much lower prices to market NFT.
I think these two coins will be a threat to other coins like ETH,BNB and ADA.

I believe that the solana blockchain is more promising. Yes there are more projects on matic now and they are larger but it seems to me that after some time the situation will change. Therefore i now prefer to work with the solana blockchain.

both of them are still looking for identity and introducing themselves to be better and to be taken into account. then the use is still a lot that happens is because of the factor of trying other alternatives to avoid high costs and speed can be fast and stable.

if you say that you prefer to work with solana blockchain it's okay because maybe you have tried it and it's the best for you, but maybe on the other hand there are those who like the other and it's legal too.

actually can't compare one with the other, because it's relative that where they are more comfortable of course that's what will be used, once again habit also affects. but what is clear is cheap and fast is a priority. for me more choices is something that is very sought after to make it easier if we really need .

Solana is a leading smart contract platform apart from ethereum.  Solana is rumour to have a lots of big financial backers from Silicon Valley.  It is no surprise that it's market cap rose exponentially.  Polygon is also a  good platform but with less users compare to Sol.  I definitely hold both for their future potential!

I am holding both coins, both are fast, both are good. But Solana has a greater budget in promotion and shilling. Polygon will dominate soon because it is a layer 2 of Ethereum blockchain.

Both have different advantages and disadvantages, Matic Polygon has a cheap transaction value, but the process is so slow to process, while Solana looks stable in making transactions, even though both are supported by many existing ecosystems, but what people choose is how to use and value cheap transactions, but I don't agree to say that Solana is a worthy competitor to BTC, BTC is very different from Solana, it's irrational to compare the two.

IF we compair wth Sol or Matic I can say matric is now under price if matic pump hard we can get this price will high too much.

Well Matic basically it's copycat of ethereum and becoming an layer-2 Solution so for some non-tech savvy it's more easier to understand if they using Ethereum and other web3 before but from my personal perspective Solana have more potential not only for DeFi but the others too, Both of them it's good long term as you said but i will prefer Solana.

The rapid growth of Solana in a short period of time indicates the interest of the crypto community in this platform. A lot of projects have appeared based on it. But Matic is somehow closer to me, it's more convenient for me to work with him. And its price is not high, so there is a reserve for its growth.

Right now, these both are in very beginning stages development is going on and growth is also very good for these, but we have to give them some more time. But, currently mostly peoples feel some better with Matic because Solana is going in some hype and recent few issues also giving some bad signals to peoples.

On other side, Matic developers are doing some good work, hopefully they will implement some better features and this will do some more better. But, now Solana need some time for giving more feedback, specially after this bad issue.

L2 And L1 mate I dont think the two compare in any case bro But still its worth noting polygon when it comes to tvl locked but am sure that will change once more defi and nft start to make growth on solana I mean it just take more usage and with the simplicity of sol and mostly zero gas I think when more people migrate there will more tvl than polygon but lets see how adoption will turn out

In my opinion, I think both are good networks, have their own blockchain and have the potential to grow the network in the future. There have been many successful projects developed on these 2 platforms. For me, I like Polygon a little bit, I used ETH and BSC networks so using Polygon is quite easy, I can even integrate those 3 networks in 1 wallet address. For Solana, the usage is a bit different, so it takes time for newbies to understand.

There is no relationship that can say that Solana is the toughest competitor of Bitcoin, Solana is still classified as a coin meme, while bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency that exists, many things differentiate the two and there is no correlation that can break Solana is Bitcoin's toughest competitor, even for the selling value of the two very much different, so how can solana be the toughest competitor for Bitcoin.
I totally agree with your statement, that it is impossible for Solana to replace Bitcoin to rival??

The two projects are very popular for chip transactions. Many projects are currently relying on Solana, but most of them are based on the NFT market.  But in the future it is expected that Polygon Matic Network will significantly improve the performance of various project markets. I think Solana is a very good project, but it doesn't look like any project has come up to show a better direction for the future, which is some NFT base project.  Solana for now but in the future if another project comes besides NFT then there will be full focus on Solana.

i choose between solana and Avanalche but with the way the crypto market is moving. i believe that solana will definitely hit over 1000usd. i think it is the real ethereum killer. the transaction are fast and it allow over 500,000tp per second. i have decided to apt into solana because i think i have what it takes to battle with ethereum and also with many projects developing on solana.it will surely battle it out with etherum. polygon has more defi platform coming but solana is stronger and better.

Both of these coins are very good and you actually do not need to pick between them. Just get both of them and you will be fine. If you have a thousand dollars and you can't decide if you want to put it on sol or matic then you should be putting 500 dollars in matic and 500 dollars in solana. That way it is going to be easier and they both look great.

Extraordinary conditions do happen when a good coin goes down and if you put it in both of them that means you are dropping the risk as well. If one of them drops, then you end up with half of your investment still in a good coin.

I only responded to what was the topic of conversation, where the topic that was created was impossible, so I tried to rationalize the topic, as I said before, that there is no way Solana can replace Bitcoin, this is not an easy thing for Solana, Bitcoin has achieved a time when many people were against bitcoin, but today the opposition is slowly recovering, in fact many people have changed their mindset, from not liking bitcoin to a very promising investment and no other format can replace it, let alone Solana?

I choose Solona over MATIC (polygon) because solana has a strong ecosystem, many successful projects on the solona platform, transaction costs are also very low, fast processing is always the goal. the beginnings of this system and more specifically Proof-of-history (PoH) consensus is one of the most important features that Solana brings to their users. many of their IDO projects on SOL platform seem to be quite profitable for each project and Sollet.io wallet says it's pretty good to use without the hassle it brings me.

That is the basis why everyone cannot accept the statement that Solana will replace Bitcoin, this does not represent a fundamental study of strong references, Solana is very different from Bitcoin, in any way the two are very different, and need appropriate rebuttals for any topic that is not based, so that the information provided does not mislead anyone who sees it, especially for those beginners, who do not really understand the comparisons given?

Solana is much more effective at leveraging crypto technology that most projects created on the solana network are more useful in this space and not just pump and dump projects.
solana directly supports new projects on the network to strengthen solana itself, not with matic which does not dare to be directly involved in new projects running on its blockchain.

Take time to review and understand the benefits of both coins. If you are unsure, it's best to buy both and allow the progress and development to push the value up. So far, we see how these two coins perform and both mostly in favor of the investors and holders.


More on your deep knowledge about splitting your investment, but if you have that understanding, it will give you decent comfort
while waiting for the coin to perform.

Ben solana için bir şey diyemem ama matic için çok şey diyebilirim. matici 3 yıldır takip ediyorum. hem ağ olarak hem topluluk olarak hem teknolojisi ekibi olarak gerçekten büyük proje. şu an bence çok ucuz btc ath yapacaksa matic hala ucuz...

I'd go for Polygon (MATIC) instead of Solana. The reasons for this are pretty obvious. Polygon is a Layer-Two scaling solution, so this means it has all of the security advantages the original ETH blockchain has. Not like Solana which has its own blockchain network that is still experimental. Its lack of security/reliability/decentralization has led to a major network disruption/outage a couple of weeks ago. Who'd want to trust Solana with their money when it can be easily attacked? With Polygon, you'll have the benefits of scalability (low fees, fast transactions) without sacrificing security/reliability/decentralization in return. With a direct link to the ETH blockchain, Polygon (MATIC) enjoys from an ever-growing library of dApps and tokens built on the Ethereum platform.

This is only an opinion, and should not be taken as investment advice. Always do your own research about the project you're willing to invest into before making the move. Only then you'll be able to avoid huge losses in the long run. It's not about Polygon or Solana, but rather how Blockchain technology can improve our lives for the better. As long as it works as intended, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts ;D

Both Polygon and Solana are great networks and real competitors to BSC. They all enable dApps to be built on, enable cheap & fast transactions, and both have fairly large communities that build on them.

Despite this though, Solana has probably had a much faster growth rate and overall the community is expanding faster but other than that it is hard to compare the two as they're both great is just that Solana is accelerating quite a bit faster than Polygon.

Since the tragedy that happened a few days ago on the solana network, somehow my personal perception of solana has changed drastically. My belief in solana has almost disappeared, that's why for now, I tend to choose polygons over solana

For me I prefer polygon over the solana.
I have used the polygon more than that of matic, and the bridge on erc-20 is the best that interest me the most on that smartchain.

Solana looks more interesting then layer 2 solution Polygon. I think that Solana may became a great competitor to Ethereum and Polygon will lose its users with ETH 2.0 launch.

SOLANA is more aggressive than MATIC for me, where if we are going to make a comparison, indeed I never saw that the MATIC token actually increased that much during an uptrend in a market where only SOLANA, CARDANO and XRP have the spotlight even nowadays when it comes to altcoins to be honest, actually they are making new highs of all time along with BITCOIN and ETHEREUM for your information, so if i was going to pick which one is good maybe for now it is SOLANA.

That's true, but that doesn't mean beginners will directly play a role and contribute to bitcoin, this will be very dangerous for them, bitcoin is not an investment for beginners, the level of risk posed to bitcoin will be very big for them, that's why I say beginners are not suitable to do this , it's true that everyone who knows the first rare crypto that they will learn is bitcoin, but that doesn't mean it's the right step, I think beginners are more suitable to invest in altcoins, considering the level of stability is easier to get?

I think Solana would overtake even Binance Smart Chain one day? Why? It has some properties that are really desirable in a proper blockchain, for example faster transaction speed and much more lower transaction fees. I feel BSC fees are topping up, probably because of popularity caused by its more dapps

Lets just say that the valuation is not everything in the market. I am yet to follow any project that uses Solana but i know plenty of projects that use Matic especially projects that are built on top of Ethereum and majority of the NFT projects are using Matic but i am yet to follow the use case of Solana and any major projects using them. The valuation is not everything as every shit coin rises once in a while and that does not mean they are good ;).

answer is really simple - both
why would you pick between Polygon and Solana, when both brings extra low transactions, and have vibrant communities that support their development

Polygon has support from Ethereum ecosystem, Solana has more money investments attached to it, but both should be good for future development, bear in mind that any of this is not financial advise, and you should do your own analysis before investment

I choose the both of them. they are wonderful projects. i think both of them are the ethereum killers with huge potentials of drawing investors mind away from ethereum. what matters most is the fees and as long as these platforms offers charges very low and allow users to transact in a fast pace. i pick both because they leverage with ethereum failed to offer and work on it.

Hey there,

I profit of this topic to ask my question here.

I'd like to get some matic Polygon but I see like 2 versions of the coin?

Matic and matic network... What is the difference. Is one of it deprecated/abandoned?

Thanks for any intel

Both projects are good, but only one prioritizes decentralization/security/censorship-resistance above all else. Polygon relies on the ETH blockchain to achieve this, making it a better option than Solana. Of course, not everyone will think this way. There are people who prefer convenience on top of anything else. Solana has its own separate blockchain network, so chances of it achieving high TPS are extremely high. But this comes at a cost of reduced security/reliability/decentralization.

Consider how Solana faced a network disruption not long ago. If it was as secure and decentralized as Polygon, it would've resisted such an attack. For this and many other reasons, I think Polygon (MATIC) will lead the way for a very long time. It's not about an specific cryptocurrency, but rather Blockchain technology as a whole. As long as projects work together to improve Blockchain tech, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts ;D

I'm more interested in using a polygon wallet (Matic) than solana. Solana in my opinion is a bit complicated, maybe it could be because I rarely use it.
Matic itself has now changed to polygon network which aims to solve problems on the ethereum blockchain because the fees charged are too high.

Sometimes comparison columns are designed as just a plan by public opinion and users to put pressure on a certain platform, as is the case with Ethereum and BSC then Solana, almost all have system tables for speed and cost, it's not to impress users, these little boards are built by users and some experts to help the platforms know the advantages and weaknesses of their competitors then confirm the needs of the market, since then, major platforms have the appropriate adjustments. Users are always silently fighting for their interests, they trust the old and high-quality platform, instead of the new platform

I prefer polygons to Solana, currently more and more large projects are using the Polygon platform so I'm optimistic that in a year Polygon will be in the top 10, devs. use Polygon because of its many advantages and is suitable for making large projects such as DeFi and NFT.

If it were between Matic or Solana, I will choose Solana right now as under Solana's belt, there were many more interesting projects than Matic. OP has mentioned NFTs and I totally agree with this. Even many of NFT projects in Solana will fail but if only one good comes out of it then Solana will receive a lot of benefit from daily usage by NFT generate.

If you got shorter budget to invest, Matic might be fit for you, and yes, both are good as they are competing,

In the long run, both coins will improve in terms of value when there are many developers who will use this chain with the chance
in gaining more value would be expected by all those who believes.

A matter of how successful they will be adding to this industry and how they will face those challenges along the way.

Both projects are good, so we can't say one will replace the other. Which one to choose is entirely your decision. I'd go with Polygon anytime simply because it's a Layer-Two scalability solution, meaning it has the same security as the main Ethereum blockchain. The same cannot be said about Solana. Consider what happened a while ago where Solana faced a network disruption and you'll see what I'm talking about. Security/reliability is what makes Blockchain best. Maybe someday Solana will become a "force to reckon with" with subsequent network upgrades? What matters is how useful Blockchain technology is. As long as you're able to put the technology to good use, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts ;D

There are many speculations that someone might have using the Polygon/Matic network, because the low fees make people want to transact quickly, because we know that transacting with the Erc20 network is because of the high gas that makes people reluctant to transact using networks like Erc20/Solana. ..

Well i think it basically depend on the usecase what the action you are performing i personally think i will invest in the matic blockchain it is still a early project to invest it envolved in the Dapp , Defi , Dao and Nft's on the other hand Solana is straight away giving competition to the ETH network it had low fees fast transaction and also recently we had seen a huge pump in the Solana network so both these coin had great future and with time we can see Alot of project launching in these blockchain

For now I choose Polygon, I'm currently trading on several polygon platforms and it's very enjoyable because of the transaction speed and very cheap transaction fees, I'm sure Polygon will enter the top 7 in 2022 because there are currently many large projects developing the Polygon platform.

I invested in these two coins at the end of 2020, both coins have a good ecosystem where both have a lot of game developers and Nft, but for now I prefer Matic since there was a problem in the Solana network last month, we know the vision and mission of the Matic platform , I hope this coin has a bigger market cap to be in the top 5 cmc

Currently Matic is still ranked 21st and Solana is already ranked 6th in CMC, now if you leave Solana just because there are a few problems that Solana's side might be able to solve immediately, then it is a small mistake for you because Solana always seems to be getting up, but Matic still tends to walk in his usual place.

The ease of use of MATIC pleases me, now a lot of projects are deployed on it, for example DEFI monox.finance, using the same Metamask.

With SOLANA it's a bit more complicated, yes it's strong, yes they started on Coinlist, but its price is unreasonably high. The place in the CMC does not say anything.

I don't think that it makes sense to choose between these cryptocurrencies, since the possibilities and technologies of both cryptocurrencies are simply incredible and therefore I have been using the technologies of both cryptocurrencies already long time and in the future I will do the same as both cryptocurrencies have very high quality and reliable technologies which constantly help me in my purposes, I also believe that the prices of these cryptocurrencies will only grow in the future because the potential of these cryptocurrencies is simply incredible and that is why so many big players invest so much in these both cryptocurrencies, of course, both cryptocurrencies have both pros and cons, but overall, I believe that these cryptocurrencies will have an incredible future.

In my opinion, these two Altcoins are very good to choose, because in terms of their future potential they are very convincing. But if I had to choose one of these Altcoins, I would prefer Matic Polygon over Solana, because Matic Polygon has a very clear vision and mission and I believe MATIC will be everyone's choice compared to Solana.

I prefer matic polygon..because it has a strong community and the cost is cheaper. I'm sure this year will fly high for matic. I hope the matic team will not lack of ideas to develop their ecosystem

For me personally, MATIC and SOLANA are coins with great potential for investment in the future. If you want to invest for the long term then I recommend both. SOLANA has reached a new ATH in early September this year, while MATIC has not yet come close to a new ATH. So, it's better if you invest both.

I prefer matic polygon , because the Matic blockchain is also listed on Opensea, which makes it have a high volume of visitors and a better market has a solid future for those who trust it

For now I choose Polygon because many of my assets are in Polygon, the thing that makes me like Polygon is the speed and very cheap transaction fees, this is the hope of the future of the world transaction system so Polygon deserves to be the first priority.

In terms of pricing and the potential for value appreciation,  I will pick polygon.  Polygon price is in accumulating phase,  and I believe polygon might break when it is least expected.  Solana gave had a good run and people are beginning to feel it's over value,  Solana however have an amazing platform!

Pollygon and Solana are currently competing against each other to demonstrate their presence in the crypto market, and several other blockchains such as Fanthom and Harmony. back to the main topic, I would personally recommend both. matic and solana worthy of investment in the future. During the current bear market, there are a lot of surprises coming to new projects on the Solana and Matic blockchain. which allows you to get a good return on investment.

If you are fan of the NFT market then all the projects that are using ETH network will be using Polygon to overcome the high transaction fees, when it comes to usability i think Polygon is serving the purpose when users are struggling with high transaction fees in the ETH network.  When it comes to token valuation Solana has a much higher valuation and i am yet to invest in Solana but i am holding Matic to make NFT transactions.

You should choose MATIC and SOLANA if it were me I would choose these 2 coins for long-term investment, it is considered to grow quite high in the future and you will be able to fix the errors of these 2 networks in a few months, that is The reason the price will continue to increase in the near future is because I have been following and learning a lot of analysis from this coin and it is highly appreciated by many famous analysts. I have used up all my savings to keep and keep these 2 coins as I believe these are the two coins that will see the best growth in the coming years.

I'm more interested in Matic polygons than Solana. because it has a more developed community, then I will definitely prefer to invest in MATIC, because I believe if MATIC can give me more profits than Solana in the future. do not take this as financial advice and do your own analysis.

Polygon naturally flows into ethereum platform. If you have worked on ethereum platform,  you don't need to repeat your work if you are going to launch on polygon platforms!  The EVM compatibility just  make your work easy.  Solana however require new language,  new structures and totally different protocol! I prefer polygon to Solana for my work!

There are no similarities that can compare Solana with Bitcoin, the two are very clear the difference, both the selling price and the buying price, let alone talking about people's interest in Solana and bitcoin, it is certain that people prefer bitcoin to make investments that have a clear big impact on crypto, even the level of stability of these two coins tends to be more secure than bitcoin compared to solana, even if it is considered a competition, then bitcoin is more superior than solana.

Matic also has OpenSea which is not only a legacy project and largest NFT market, it's a major on-ramp for noobs.

indeed because both are new platforms, it is clear to prove whether which one is better cannot be done quickly and needs to be analyzed in real time in the future. you are right that polygons are identical to the ethereum platform and it is clear that its development guarantees that, but because the cost of ethereum gas is still high, there will be problems of its own at a certain time.

more merchants signed up to SOL for DeFi and NFT projects, a very consistent increase in the number of active traders. even some oracle networks like Switchboard are bringing feeds to Solana, obviously greatly underpinning Solana's popularity, which has the effect of making it mainstream and increasing demand across exchanges.

but everything will be visible for a while and can't see for now. so both have their own advantages and who is more ready to compete, because the competition is not only on the platform of the two of them alone because there are other platforms that are also very good.

Both are interesting techwise.

I lean more towards Solana, as it has much better PR, community, and major players backing.

I've tried both and for transaction fees I think Polygon is 50% cheaper than Solana, this is what makes many devs currently switch projects to Polygon because I believe Polygon is a coin that will be a tough competitor to BSC.

Both coins can indeed be relied on because they have their own advantages, but polygon coins are easier for us to use because there are many platforms that adopt polygon so that for the development of both coins are superior to polygon, and I have tried to use the solana network but the arrangement is very complicated so we are a little difficult in using the network, but for polygon networks we can connect with metamask and how to use it is very easy so I prefer polygon network.

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Solona Usecase and partnerships are much  higher than Matics at this time. Specially in Nfts Solona beat all other contracts even Etherium.
Matic fee is very low and many Gaming projects are entering in Matic and this is positive signs for Matics. I believe that in near future Matics and Solona both will beat Etherium and Bsc.

Solana team is doing some better from other projects because they are feeling in near future we will have some good hype in NFT games and NFT related stuff, so they are doing partnerships and better features in this way even Matic is also having some good at gaming industry and too many new gamer projects joining them just because of very low cost, but this is good for community and devs as now they have some good choices for their projects with very good features and fees is also very affordable as sometime back we were living with just alone Ethereum.

Currently, Ethereum team is also doing some better if they solve fees issue then surely this competition could be much better, and we will have some more interesting features and developments in these platforms for crypto community.

For me, both have different portions, but in its development, matic has an easier and cheaper transaction rate, while Solana has a large ecosystem and is fully supported by the community, both in my opinion are good and can be used according to the needs of the community for both, this is that encourage people to choose one of the two, this bias cannot be interpreted on a small scale.

Corresponding to his statement, today I was seeing a very interesting project that is of NFT origin running through Polygon, and the truth was in the pre-sale stage of a Metaverse, the truth is that the project has a lot of future, I think now everything is It will go through the metaverses and through the NFTs, and in the sale through the Polygon network for those who entered it was a success, it lasted 30 minutes and things went well, what I do not like about these networks is that there is always a bridge that When you make the change, it takes away some of the fee, and it is not necessary, if there is a network that has already had many beta tests, at least the fee should not be charged, it is a way to be able to compete with networks such as BSC and obviously ETH, but in itself, everything was very fast and safe, the truth is the experience with Polygon ..

Between Polygon and Solana, I'm more interested in Solana. Because the Solana system was built from the ground up. Not on a mainnet system. Maybe Polygon is almost the same as Binance Smart Chain, we can still use the same wallet just need to change the mainnet system.
But if you say Bitcoin competitor, I think this is the dream of people who don't sleep. Bitcoin does not provide smart contract services, and the capabilities of the Bitcoin blockchain system have been tested for years without any changes. Solana's rivals may be BSC, Tron, ADA, in terms of a better blockchain concept going forward and mass adoption.

Both are good projects, but only one is truly decentralized. Polygon fits the bill nicely as a decentralized alternative of the ETH blockchain. Solana, on the other hand, is less-decentralized making it extremely-vulnerable to external attacks. The fact that the network was disrupted a while ago, tells us that Solana is not as reliable as we thought it would be.

Ultimately, it all comes down to a person's preference. As long as these coins have strong community backing, they won't be going anywhere soon. Who knows how far Polygon and Solana will go? Just my thoughts ;D

MATIC & Solana definitely both of promising. I recommend to buy both of coins. Solana price too high, If right now MATIC is pretty low i think it will big profits in long run investment. In the development Solana is strong fundamental than MATIC. But to use MATIC network is quite easy accessible, like as ETH and MATIC are similar just changing network from Metamask.

Both are good coins and as well as good Blockchains. I like both coins and holding both coins for long term. Both coins will perform good in future.  So hold both coins at cheap prices. Don't buy it at once wait for dump and then buy it.
Both Blockchains are really fast, transparent and secure.

The two projects have transparent secure and fast blockchains so I can't tell them apart. Both have millions of investors and large communities. Although SOL is a bit newer, it has come to its current state with huge funding and I believe it will develop further. Both are logical projects to invest in, in my opinion. Looks like they're going to keep being Major for many years.

Between Polygon and Solana I prefer Polygon (Matic) network.  Because its transaction fee is very low and transaction speed is high.
On the other hand, I have not done any transaction in solana network yet. Solana wallet seems strange to me.

Both of the cryptocurrencies are good, but I think Solana has a higher security and a bigger hype. Even though the Solana’s ecosystem is bigger in this case, the Polygon’s community is believed to be more stronger than that of Solana. Both of them are good and they have the same aim of improving the scalability issues of the blockchain, though they have different approach to doing that.

In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.

Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.

Very good point, it's investor's preference to how to pick between the two,

as long as they are willing to support the asset that they believe to be more successful.
It's them that will invest, by doing deeper analyzation
will help to protect their money.

We don't know what will be the fate of these two coins, all the developments and progress
will be the deciding factor for more success
in the future.

Both cannot be doubted. It has its own advantages. However, I tend to polygon when it comes to performance. Plus polygon depends on the new network. I am sure, when solana starts large transaction costs will also be higher. There polygon will be ready to replace solana position.

when it comes to gas I think it comes back to their prices.
look at ETH when their prices go up now their gas is very crazy and users are always complaining.
Currently, I also feel that BNB has increased slightly, although not significantly.
and This will also certainly apply to Sol. Their prices are currently slowly rising and continue to get more attention from most people and indirectly they will also have an effect on gas and of course this will continue to increase when indeed they continue to rise

You've said it yourself. Solana is full of hype. Not like Polygon which is decentralized and has a proven track record of development and innovation. I wouldn't say Solana has a higher security than Polygon, simply because it's been a victim of external attacks (network disruptions) over the course of the year. Developers are now proposing an "observation system" that would greatly centralize the network if implemented. With this, I wouldn't count on SOL as a serious long term investment. Not like Polygon which is a sidechain of the Ethereum blockchain. The network enjoys all of the security and reliability of its parent chain.

Using MATIC would be no different than using ETH (except for the fact that the UX on Polygon is better than ETH with the low fees and fast TX confirmation times). At nearly $3 per coin, I'd say MATIC is extremely undervalued. Who knows if someday MATIC surpasses SOL in market cap? Just my opinion :)

Well at the current market  scenario i will pick matic in my bag no doubt both had great volume and both are good but i am still very much positive about Matic price it can go beyond to 10$ in 2022 according to my assumptions as we are seeing alot of new project is launching in the matic Network on the other hand solana had also shown an amazing growth over a past period of time but still i think polygon will be Cheap and it will that hidden gem that i pick

I think Solana edges it by the skin of  Samo's snarling tooth. Why? Its sharding power and the transaction speed is the upper hand it holds on its opponents. Mind you I rate Polygon too and have quite a bag, but I still think Polygon and Cardano can't hold a candle on Solana. Polkadot comes close

Why not both platforms? Both are actually promising to hold. MATIC or SOL, will possibly give you good profits this year. So diversify your portfolio, and keep up with their progress to check where they are heading. Both projects are showing very good sign in the market.

At present we can see that the polygon matic platform is moving much further from Solana. We now see the location of the Polygon Matic Platform right after the Binance Smart Chain Platform. This polygon metic platform is expected to go a long way in the future.

both! but as for me - matic more comfortable to use! dont understand why someone choose solana?

I've never used the Solana network, but I think the MATIC network which is fast and cheap than BSC or ethereum makes me optimistic that the MATIC network will soon become the first choice of developers, and it is evident that many NFT and Metaverse projects are using MATIC.

I've used both and I can say that polygon is more friendly, solana wallet is confusing to many newbies I've seen but I don't care though, I want coins like these two in my portfolio for long term, I believe they will keep growing and growing, Polkadot and Avalanche are a must have too

These two coins are good choices to be made as investments because they have the potential and can provide a large return due to the increasing popularity of Matic and Solana to date, so far many investors have chosen these two coins to invest, but regardless of the development of these two coins, very good so far, but in terms of security I will choose MATIC over SOL because the security offered by MATIC is more promising.

I Buy Sell and trade both Solona and Matic.  Of the two, I prefer the Matic Token tie because it is a very good and high quality token.  And it's much faster and safer.  You can invest in matic token with your eyes closed.

In my opinion, these two platforms are worthy. But Polygon gets more preference. It's kind of intuitive. I use it more, but I also consider it promising to invest in SOL. I think they have everything ahead.

MATIC is the true winner here since it focuses on decentralization/security/reliability. Its competitor, Solana, has been facing several network outages putting its reliability in question. I wouldn't count on SOL for serious transactions, as the network is too flawed. Not like MATIC which is secured by the main Ethereum blockchain. It's a sidechain after all. The coin is trading below $2, as not many people are aware of its true benefits. Once Polygon gains traction, MATIC will surely go all the way to the moon. Who knows what will be of both chains in the future? Just my thoughts ;D

I chose MATIC, many predictions from experts that Matic will continue to grow so that it will become a big platform, even many analysts believe that this year Matic will compete with ERC and BSC.

In terms of quality I prefer solana. As much as gozali NFT who had trended with polygon networks I think NFT in opensea is mostly just duplication, Solana is more qualified even though it does not have a large community can lift some projects that are published in their networks, such as Solanium and Samo.

On my opinion, both of those deserves attention. Im buying 30%/30% for both in my portfolio.
We cant say they are similar, they are different, Matic it's 1 layer problem solution resolve for Ethereum, which contains  same secure like in eth, lower commission for mass adoption and faster network on PoS.
Solana have the same, lower commission, faster network and etc,  but one different resolve, solana its hybrid  PoS and Proof of History.
So ive think we should use both of them.

Both are great to invest, SOL has increased a lot in few months, but the matic is still there so now the chances of matic breakout are more than Solana breakout. There is also another project same as these. Terra is also a good project and growing too fast looking competitive with Solana .
Let's see who wins.

my choice is polygon, for all the time of use there are no problems with the network, transactions are fast and most importantly cheap, but the solana network has hung up several times and this is a big minus today, this project occupies the top 10 CMC and should work without failures.

What do you mean Solana network has hung up several times, i have not encountered that situation. When it comes to investment, i will go to Matic aka Polygon because of the use case and the really low valuation and on the other hand Solana had its rally and majority of the projects that uses ETH network as their base platform usually migrate to Polygon because of the ease of migration and i always felt it is undervalued.

I beg to differ regarding your point on no problems with the Polygon network. While Polygon Matic is the more promising of the two, there was a big outage on Polygon on March 10th and the chain halted. I just checked the groups and the latest status is that everything is back on line. A lot of people were worried over the weekend. In addition, there was recently a big performance impact on Polygon due to SFF. The network fees have gone up sharply on Polygon as well, although still negligible in comparison with Eth.

Both are okay. Polygon is a layer2 helping ETH scale the congested chain, some ERC20 easily port to polygon to reduce operational fees to customers. Very fast and cheap. While Solana is a layer1 blockchain. You need to understand SOL ecosystem currently doing about 60K TPS, with ability to do more at a near zero transaction fee.

Both platforms for me are promising as trading platforms are integrating both of these networks in their options.
The fees are quite cheaper also than existing ERC20 network, which of course, is the main reason why these new chains are getting popular.
But we still need to see which of them can truly attract good projects. Because if the dev and users are satisfied, they will endorse it to others.
By the way, I saw one casino using the Polygon network in their USDT withdrawal and I can say, it is very cheap with 0.05 USDT as fee.

In my opinion, Solana has more potential than Matic and it has also a different blockchain and crypto ecosystem. It is not a supportive blockchain from erc20 but a new program with a new ecosystem. Many of the new crypto projects and tokens are also launching on SOL blockchain and providing a big use-case of SOL in the crypto market. I prefer Solana and It is my own opinion.

talking about samo maybe the price has increased sharply because the samo coin is the first coin meme on the Solana network. On the other hand the price of new altcoins on the Solana network does have a better price than on other networks such as BNB or Matic.

what do you mean Solana network has died several times? So far I'm making transactions on the Solana network without any issues and very low network fees. speaking of rankings on CMC lately Solana's ranking has dropped quite far from the 4th rank to the 9th rank. If this situation continues it is possible that Solana will be eliminated from the top 10 of CMC in the near future.

Actually I'm happy to see Solana is in the top 20 altcoin list along with Polygon (Matic)
But Solana doesn't support EVM, some blockchains are still being developed and I hope there will be new ideas and products that are better from these two projects like, can send tokens to different chains in just one click

If for the reason that token delivery can only be done in one click, then the BSC network can also be like that and the ERC20 network can also be like that, it's just that each network has different transaction fees from one another so that's what makes the difference now and some people look forward to the Matic and Solana Networks to continue to grow and be better than BSC and ERC20.

If you have a good amount of money to invest, both still have a good future ahead, but if you are trying

to minimize your investment, you can go with matic and try figuring out if you'll going to short or to take a lone ride.
We never know what future would be for this industry but as long as you have a good overview of possible outcome
choosing your investment is very important to take.

Tough choice I have to say because both are equally strong, and I feel unable to win either of them, if I could, I would buy both and I would keep them for next five years. But I think for shorter distances, MATIC has more opportunities because the price is still cheap now, this is related to the gas fee from the network. IMHO

Ethereum has had many competitors in the past. All of them have been deleted. Investing in Layer 1 projects is always a bit risky. That's why I choose the Layer 2 project Matic. A good solution partner for Ethereum. But I think both are overpriced. They do not make money for their investors in the short term. I don't think they are good options to invest in. I wish you good luck.

Well i tend to go with the general feeling of the project overall on market, and i've been hearing a lot on how solana crashes every now and then which scares plenty of people off but i still see the potiential in it. But i'm putting my stables in the Polygon bag. I'm thinking of going with #Lunafi when they finally release next month, they're mostly a gambling protocol with plans to bring their own casino to the metaverse, but i'm more into their yield farming which gives you a cut every time someone makes a bet on Lunafi which sounds ideal for a laid back investing strategy. Also i found this new game from $ENGN that's being released this march and by the looks of it, it looks like Fortnite but on roids! Any suggestions if i should diversify my portfolio or just stick with these 2 ?

 It is quite obvious to me that we will definitely see these "ethereum killers" go down in the list for sure. Some of them are making themselves not be against ETH all times and have their own merit and their own ecosystem for sure. Like Avax is something I can see going for a while, its really not that terrible because they are working on a project that changes the "proof of ...." part of the crypto world. But even they may not end up with something decent. All in all I believe that we should not really be surprised if top ten rankings will not look like this in a year or two, most of them will be gone when ETH 2.0 hits the market.

Polygon also experienced a network outage with the recent upgrade pushed by the project's developers. People weren't able to use MATIC for more than 10 hours, putting its reliability in question. It's no wonder why Ethereum is still the "King of De-Fi" even if other chains promise faster and cheaper transactions. Security/reliability/decentralization comes first in order to make the Blockchain work as intended. Without prioritizing this, you'd get nothing more than an unstable system that's flawed by design (similar to centralized payment processors).

Solana may be the fastest (and possibly the cheapest) smart contract platform in the world, but its security is terrible compared to Polygon (MATIC). I'd choose MATIC over SOL anytime just because it's much more secure and reliable. But there's always a risk, so I'd advise anyone to proceed with caution. Just my opinion :)

You can choose both. Solana and Mathic are both huge projects. In my opinion, if you are talking about a long-term future investment, I can see this badge project currently competing with Ethereum. Because both have good features and their future planning is very strong. In my opinion, both these projects, which have reached a good height in a short period of time, can give you wonderful benefits for long term investment.

Solana is a blockchain base-layer protocol, Solana can be considered as a direct competitor to Ethereum. The fact that the network went offline last year is very worrying and this is likely to continue if the transaction volume on the sol network increases rapidly, which will overload the sol network.

Matic and sol are both very good and worth using, but for investment and profit I think I will choose Matic for now because Matic is still undervalued compared to its potential.

Thinking about long-term investment? Both assets are qualified, the progress is still ongoing.

If you have good spare money to invest best to split and take these two coins inside your safe wallet, you'll see good returned
in each period that both coins show updates and new developments.

Both are moving forward and coming outwith usages where developers will take it as a good alternative in creating new coins.
It's always the usages that earned the trust of investors and traders.

I feel like MATIC's infrastructure is a little more mature due to things built on Ethereum being a copy/paste to work on Polygon.  That makes it incredibly easy for developers to build as well as for existing organizations to assimilate.  Solana requires a bit more specialized attention and new wallets that most users would have to go out of their way to get ahold of.  Solana has seen a lot of attention the past year, and I think the big difference between the two is L1 vs L2.  So I guess your preference should rely a bit on whether you are wanting to use something brand new or something that is attached to another project.  Personally, I like that MATIC is basically Ethereum without the high fee issues.

I concur. MATIC is basically the same as Ethereum, but with improved performance. Solana is a completely different Blockchain with its own consensus algorithm and codebase. It's much faster and cheaper to use than Polygon/MATIC, but it's completely unreliable. People will need to choose between the two depending on their needs. It doesn't matter which Blockchain it is as long as you're able to get the most out of it. Usability comes first above all else. As long as the aforementioned Blockchain networks are useful, nothing else matters. Just my thoughts ;D

At the moment I will talk about buying solana instead of matic. If you can hold on for long term, these two are good for you, but now I will give preference to solana because "Video game developer Krafton (PUBG Publisher) announced a partnership with Solana Labs". And solana will do well in the future

Actually both coins are good at the moment and it will be very good if someone has both for investment in the long term, because in truth Matic is also not bad for anyone who likes it even though when compared to Solana, it is clear that Matic is still losing, but doesn't mean it's bad.

I think both ecosystems are very good and if we can enter the 2 ecosystems why not because there will be many choices and innovations in our investment, but I prefer Polygon because the price is still cheap and many markets are already using the Polygon network such as DEX and NFT markets with that it will make it easier for us to do many things even though the two coins are still very worth for us to hold for a long time.

I chose polygon matic because it is more popular that many people are using matic at this time if solana needs to pay to add tokens to the donpet

I totally agree you mate  . I just give my opinion base on at this time  . Looking at the current situation, it seems wise for me to invest in Solana, but that does not mean that I am calling Matic bad.  You have to understand the subject, I just gave my opinion ,I also think that matic is a good coin for investment .I myself have been investing in it for some time now.

Both projects deserve trophies since we’re here discussing which one is better.

I personally think Polygon (Matic) is going to impress many of us, and it is actually already doing it.

Last times have been tough for all of the coins and entire market. But I see Matic keeping its average and maybe soon coming close to its highs.

Also, I’ve read many interesting articles, but this one attached shows a lot of promises for Matic.

If anyone interested, here is the link  - https://capital.com/polygon-matic-price-prediction-and-analysis

I've been using the Polygon network/platform for a long time in selling my NFT work, Polygon at no cost base, on sale, after sale, gas automatically, in NFT trading I prefer to use the Polygon platform.

I think you can choose polygon because polygon have lots of chance to grow like solana soon most of the projects focus on them!!  Though solana also a chain which is interested to investors but they already did a lot i think they needs time for grow now but polygon growing conitnously and slowly!!

I think Solana is more equipped and sophisticated for the crypto journey than Polygon is. The latter can be infuriatingly slow when it is clogged up. So maybe I am biased because of that

Both are good to go but personally, I prefer Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is growing rapidly these days and it will be the same in the upcoming days. And I guess Solana has more potential to support more coins as well.

this is a good competition, Matic is playing as modified L2 on Ethereum, Solana is L1, but they have almost the same properties, and one could decide based on preferences
seems that both are here to stay, looking to top20 coins position, and have limited validator sets, but fast and cheap transactions, and both have their issues with bottlenecks and stopping blockchains due to overload

for me, Matic has a bit better perspective, but one should DYOR before any type of investment, it is a risky investment for sure

Polygon is an old network that still has many shortcomings even though it has advantages through transaction gas fees, but through transaction speed it still tends to lose compared to others including Solana, so it is clear that in this case I also think that Solana is better than Polygon now

In fact, if I don't want to bring up the problems that we both have, I think they both deserve to be in the portfolio. Given their popularity in the crypto space these days and the ecosystem they are creating, I am optimistic about their ability to go even further in this market. I myself have made great profits from both these coins. Up to this point, I have maintained and kept them because I am not too concerned about future issues.

more to matic because it is more friendly for the current price, Solona is already high enough if you want to adopt it, moreover matic is already quite a lot in the dex, and the important thing is that Opensea has adopted the matic which made me fall in love with matic,
but it does not rule out that there is a little SOL in my wallet

Here is some alpha for you. I got rich investing in NEAR when there was no real DeFi, only NFT trading on Mintbase. If you invest in Polygon and Solana you will do well but you need to get in on a project early if you want to get rich. The internet computer has NFT trading but no DeFi yet. Buying $ICP now is like buying NEAR at $3.50.

Current use case of blockchain is attracting the attention of everyone. Almost every person who knows crypto space, wants to take advantage. They try to found the most promising technology . In this perspective if I compare between SOL and MATIC  that would be the very difficult to select which one will be better.  In some points like Consensus Mechanism, Faster Transactions, Stateful  Architecture and Scalability Solana is the best option between the two.

if you compare with these two altcoins and have to choose, I would suggest you choose Matic/Polygon,
why? because their Fees are cheaper than Ethereum, and of course Matic has used many use cases,
both from NFT and even PlayToEarn, Solana is also good, but I prefer Matic

If you have to choose, then Matic/Polygon is better to hold, because there are many advantages in Metic, in addition to cheap transaction fees, coin stability is also in the perfect category, but if you have the same opportunity, Solana is also in a good category which is almost the same as matic, although there is a difference between the two, both the selling price and the buying price, I think both can be run simultaneously in investing

For now I choose MATIC, a new pleasant experience because I use MATIC and the transaction fees for swaps are very cheap, and another thing in my opinion is the transaction speed is good and it only takes a few seconds to reach 20 confirmations, besides that the market opportunity will continue to grow .

Each of those big players have what they contribute to crypto one way or the other. I think, Solana has its forte in NFTs while Polygon is big on DeFi. There may be overlaps, of course

I think polygon(MATIC) and solana both have very bright potential and prospects in the future, because these two platforms support multiple defi and nft systems, and both have very good growing ecosystems at the moment, therefore That's why I personally really favor these two and choose both to invest in the long term.

I think polygon and sol both have potential growth future because lots of project are looking forward to them and joining with their nft and ecosystem in this case same are valuable.  In my opinion you can invest on them by dividing your investment money anyone can grow like moon very soon!!

Personally, I prioritize investing in altcoins like this, because what I see is that polygon and solana have good prospects, but because of the correction in the market, Metic and Solana also have an impact, but in the long run these two coins have a greater success rate. in my view, so this kind of coin should be used in investment

this is kinda true the valuation of solana has been overly inflated these recent months and even though there are big communities behind solana i just can’t see any meaningful project getting in to the platform.
instead in matic there are so many projects either migrating or founding themselves in the platform and these projects mostly are the same quality of the ones that are running in ETH platform and I think matic just better in terms
of its ecosystem considering the fact that it just feels so familiar just like ETH because it was formerly 2nd layer solution for ETH but now it kinda standing alone and could become a replacement for the ETH.

Polygon Matic and Solana are the two leading platforms in terms of popularity.We have seen that almost all projects are now trying to bring on the matic platform.But the Solana platform will go further in the future and become popular with everyone.

Solana (SOL), Polygon (MATIC) are currently seen as great alternatives for investments right now as the prospects of these projects seem positive, potential.  Solana went the NFT route and quickly gained recognition, garnering some attention and fame for its ease of access and very affordable fees.  I think solana and polygon matic are very good, everyone should care

If ypu consider my personal Perspective then bro SOL is better fo the day to day usage low fees and a more Vast and Huge Ecosystem for the NFTs and Gaming Projects. Matic is stable and Sustainable Solution but the Popularity and the usage of the Sol is Much more greater as compared to the Matic.

One more thing Consider the LUNA in the Middle of both these chains Sustainability + Popular and in coming days may be It will dissolve the SOL .. lets see

Polygon Matic and solana are cryptos that have a very good future.
polygon matic working with opensea has a very good advantage and makes an alternative to eth for being able to buy an nft with coins and networks from polygon matic.
many have been developed and I think if the market is good this polygon matic will be able to become a rival for eth. so is solana
lots of new coins are popping up using the network from solana. they also have their own wallet, sollet.io which functions similarly to the metamask wallet but only for the solana network.
I think it will also be a formidable rival for eth

If both projects will continue to attract developers, it will have a good future ahead.

There are updates and supporters who are already in these projects traders who understand the benefits in case more success
will take place from this venue of investment.

Progress and continually updating the community will give Sol and Matic more investors to buy and hold. Just like how
those successful projects, it's more on developers to bring the project more useful.

Sol has better market capitalization and is currently more popular than matic so I think solana is the safer option for now. But I think polygon platform starting to get bigger attention and it is possible that they can catch up. But if you looking for long term I don't think both of them is good, I think this nft and metaverse will not last long, maybe just another year. So you need to know the perfect time to get in and get out.

Both platforms are no doubt, many investors have used the platform, and I have seen that the two platforms have their own advantages, so both of them we can rely on, and for transaction costs both are still very cheap and we as investors this is the most important thing in making exchanges, so we just try both platforms in making transactions.

I still think MATIC will have the same fate as BSC, they do have cheap gas costs which many people like as well as being an alternative to ethereum which gas is so high. Having many platforms that accept payments with the MATIC network is usually the NFT market. However, the generosity of transactions in the MATIC network is also used by criminals to create dusting tokens. Solana has a network that may be more complicated than an EVM network similar to etheruem, so not all token dusting is created there, their network looks really friendly so far.

If Im not mistaken Solana is not compatible with EVM right? So you cannot use it in metamask where I use mostly in connecting dapps under EVM, SOL uses different wallet for connecting dapps thats why I always prefer Matic over Solana in many ways.

There are complications when using Solana, many things must be added when making transactions, Matic is quite simple to make transactions, there are not many complications when we use it, and also Solana and Metic are more competent to choose Metic, because in the market this coin can still moves to the green chart under certain conditions, even though the selling price is not so maximal. But compared to Solana, Matic is more stable and good enough going forward

Sol might have a better market cap but I think matic is more popular than it. Matic is the third best alternative next to eth and binance coin but both matic and sol are still safe and good for long term investment especially matic since matic didn't experience to burst yet but maybe it will in the upcoming future. Sol is an old project and I don't think it has something to do with the metaverse.

Matic on the other hand is much newer than sol and I think it's also not related to metaverse but there are metaverse projects that are good enough and they prolly can last long. For the most of them especially to newer ones, you should be careful and always stay updated so that you can get out quickly before they collapse.

Compatibility always have a good factors with end users, traders and investors always look for usability

and hypes, two things that give them reason to invest and hold for certain assets, Matic and Sol are both getting updates
and progress in which if you have confidence, you can still earn out from these two assets.

In terms of choosing from both assets, it would be depend from how you see the possible progress that may bring more
interest from the whole market.

A lot of people are less bullish on Polygon since discovering that a small number of team members control the multi-sig for billions of dollars and they all work in the same area. It wouldn't be difficult for them to walk away with that money since they are all friends and they live in India, a place known for giving fake death certificates and new identities.

Solana broke the other day for the 8th time. If you are still invested in this chain, you aren't going to make it. It's the laughing stock of the industry.

Instead consider ICP and NEAR protocol as alternatives. ICP has better tech and a more trustworthy team than Polygon. NEAR has 100% uptime and is more scalable than Solana.

I don't  like solana,i like polygon matic.Both are good but personally i like Matic.Polygon are more beneficial me.Specially that's good matic gas cost cheap.Many platforms that accept payments with the MATIC network and NFT market.Matic is more popular from solona.That is why many are investing in matic i think.

to be honest I really like the Solana network (SOL) because the transaction is very fast and it is possible that there will be good news to come in the next SOL project, hopefully this will bring beauty to all users of the Solana network (SOL)

I like Matic more than Sol, I used to appreciate Sol but Sol seems to lag behind other blockchains. Since its launch, the Sol network has gone offline 7 times, which is really disappointing given that Sol is rated as the 6th largest blockchain today. The most recent outage was on May 1, when the Sol network crashed continuously for 7 hours, rendering users inaccessible. I hope the project team can find a solution to this situation in the near future.

I'm afraid SOL won't last for long if network outages persist. The inability of developers to provide a solution to the problem will make SOL go down the drain faster than you could've ever imagined. MATIC is a better option because of its focus on decentralization and censorship-resistance. It's a very underrated project simply because not many developers are working on it (aside from the lack of marketing/promotion). Solana is a different kind of blockchain with a different consensus mechanism, so people often find it a much more attractive investment than the former.

Ultimately, it comes down to which coin you'd want to invest for the long haul. As long as you do your own research before investing on a coin, you'll be on a road towards non-stop success. Who knows what the future holds for both projects? Just my opinion :)

right, solana still has a lot of problems, a lot of flaws here and there. I am an active user of my local exchange and every time I want to make a transfer on the Solana network, I see that they often do maintenance wallets for the Solana network. In the future I don't know if Solana will be further refined, but if asked to choose between matic and questions then I choose matic.

Well both networks are very good, they have everything that is looking for me, such as low price fees and well everything I have read promises a lot for the metaverses, for me the Polygon network is better to buy at Matic price, and although the Solana network is one of the best, the currency is very accessible, many people are using it to be able to make transactions from other countries through the Solana network, because their fees are approximately 0.001USD, I think it may be that the two networks are support and have everything necessary for the metaverse networks to be Polygon and Solana, it is what sounds the most to me.

Both polygon and solana are good coins. If you compare them looking at the price, then there is a lot of difference in the price of both. But investors should pay attention to the return they get while investing and according to me both the coins are such that if invested for a long period, they can give good returns.

I think the problem is not always with the network but the exchange team updated the deposit address of solana, you can test it to transfer solana koin to any other address of solana you have and if there is no problem then confirmed that the exchange updated the system.

When there is a big test in the market then the best thing we do is keep buying, some coins that look very promising are MATIC, I'm sure by 2022 MATIC can reach at least $ 10 or 16x the current price, don't hesitate because MATIC has strong community and financial support strong.

I see Solana has had a high price even though I see that Solana has a very good ecosystem and has a great future.  But Matic also has a good ecosystem but with a lower value and if you see how NFT will develop in the future, I think I will invest in Matic first and then I will invest in Solana.  Both are the best if we look at the ecosystem they already have or how the team has built both projects over the years.

Polygon and Solona aren't exactly alternatives to each other.
Solona is an alternative to Ethereum.
Polygon is a Layer-2 blockchain.
Polygon has alternatives like BSC and GnosisChain.

So the comparison of polygon and solo is not a reasonable enough comparison.

Solona is really performing well. However, I would go with Polygn. I have been watching its growth since 2018 and I do believe in the team and their consistent excellence in it. Could see a rabbit growth last year when Bitcoin had its ATH. Yes, besides the ATH, Matic always remained trusted on its network and marketing. I remember the day when Matic crossed a dollar. Yes both coins are awesome, however i would go with Polygn.

I frequently make transactions on both networks and so far I haven't had any serious issues with my transactions, and the transaction fees I incur are also very low. I can't decide which is the best between the two because they are both the best altcoins with very fast transaction speeds and very low fees. Of course I would recommend anyone to invest in these two altcoins and not choose one of them, although in CMC rankings they are quite far apart but both are the same as big altcoins because both are in the top 20 of CMC.

Both are good platforms. However, I have chosen to invest in Matic because the team has a good vision, and the project development is always updated from time to time. This shows that the platform has consistency in development in the future.

platforms like Solana and Polygon are gaining a lot of fashionability. If you're new to the crypto request or are lately entering the NFT and Defi request. In total, if you're looking for the most reliable platform with security and features, it would be Ethereum. still, if you're looking for affordability and faster pets, it would be better to conclude for Solana or Polygon.

Difficult, because both have the same influence in their respective fields. If I had to choose, I prefer solana, recently I saw the developer solana release v1.10.23
I watched solana continue to develop, and saw something that made solana slightly superior to matic
But of course everyone has their own comparison between these two platforms, and development is my comparison between solana and matic

Yes, we can say both are good projects, but apart from the outages that were done several times with the Solana network recently so for now I prefer Matic to be an investment because the Matic project looks more promising than SOL and in my opinion the development team from Matic's project seems to be more solid so even if there are problems with the project they are likely to be able to overcome it in a short time.

in my opinion, I like all of them, be it POLYGON'S MATIC OR SOLANA.
But if I may choose, I prefer MATIC.

They are both good projects, so it will be a bit difficult to choose between both. I do have some reservation for polygon, they often have network congestion resulting in failed transactions. But, their fee is so so cheap and this is a very good incentive for the network issue

Unfortunately, in this case, only two options are presented, such as Solana and Polygon, so you have to choose one of them by not bringing the other in this option such as Ethereum. I personally still really like Polygon in this regard, and it's not only about the low transaction fees on the Polygon network, but also because of the transaction speed and also about the support on some very important stable coins.

Ithink matic is still under value unlike solona all ready reach 100usdt, but the matic is not, matic will reach 100 usdt soon matic is a hidden gem.

Is it true that there are problems with solana? You know this better than me because you are a follower of this coin but if you are a solid follower, that problems won't easily discourage you from supporting sol. It should come to a point first where its value can crash like what happened to luna and there will be no chance for it to recover before you finally change your perspective towards it.

You are talking about developments there but most of the comments here also states that there's also lots of developments going on for matic but it is surprising that matic value is still the same. It didn't pumped up really high. This could be the reason why solana is better than matic, in terms of value.

I don't think Matic is over valued still up to this time, id indeed the market has already bottomed. Its time to buy loads of it. Once the tokens from ETH and BNB able to migrate to Matic and SOL, the two will have a good price.

These are all layer1 token, obviously they all have utility that creates demand when more projects are developed on its chain. The developers and projects contributes to rise of SOL or MATIC.

Why limit ourselves to one option when we can have both?  I would say, save yourself a headache and invest in both of them.  Besides these two cryptocurrency is very promising.  It won't hurt if both give you a good profit.


Matic in my opinion is still undervalued, comparing its price to other shit tokens that are more expensive.  Besides Matic is already has a solid foundation and has been around the market for several years.

MATIC's never been a victim of network outages (as far as I know), yet it's a lot cheaper than Solana itself. The latter may have better performance, but it's heavily centralized. It's the reason why Solana experiences constant outages. People want something that's reliable and safe to use. Not something that's relatively unstable. Solana's been full of hype since day one, so I wouldn't be surprised if sometime in the future it goes back to the "triple digits".

As far as the Polygon (MATIC) blockchain is concerned, I think it'll survive a lifetime because of its decentralized and censorship-resistant design. All it needs is strong marketing efforts to attract as much investors as possible. The cryptocurrency is pretty cheap these days, so it wouldn't hurt to buy more coins in case it "blows up" in the future. Just my thoughts ;D

Solana and matic do have their respective advantages.

but for me Matic is far superior. even recently rumors circulated that Matic collaborated with Disney and Marcedes bens. In addition, the price of Matic is still a little cheap and still has the potential to go higher. But everyone's analysis is different. because everyone's findings are also different. so keep DYOR.

It is true that Solana and Polygon have their respective advantages and disadvantages, when compared overall they are not much different actually.
Both are potential coins and worth buying, depending on which one we trust more. If we have a large enough capital there is no harm in investing
in both, because it would be better to invest in several projects than only investing in one project. But since the crypto market is now in a bear
market situation, it may be necessary to be more careful in making decisions. So we should do research and analysis before deciding to invest,
so we will not regret the decision we will take. But for now I trust Solana more than Polygon, not because Polygon is bad, but based on the analysis
that I did Solana could give me a much bigger profit.

I will always choose MATIC over Solana, especially now since MATIC holders will get a MAXX finance airdrop. I may pivot some funds into Solana if they can get their blockchain working properly.

Maybe ill go in matic why beacuse solana is allready ath hit 100 usdt up. Matic have a potential ithink and soon it will be hit the peice like solana thats why iam always buy matic when the has dip

both were popular in the previous season. but it's the SOL that does make an amazing pump. Several token launch events with the Solana network also got hype. but recently we heard some bad news about the Solana network. it impacts the value of SOL in today's market.
but I believe Matic will gradually become big in the future. the first step as you mentioned has been executed. and then there will be more big news.

Surely the choices of people are different and of course all have strong reasons for their choices. and in my opinion, polygon matic is quality crypto and solana is also quality crypto. but if i prefer and i will choose matic polygons, because matic polygons in my opinion the trading volume is good and for now the price is still cheap so it's worth buying.

polygon matic is a quality cryptocurrency, and many big investors who invest in polygon matic, and also those who invest in polygon matic can be categorized as all walks of life. but of course solana is no less great because a lot of people invest in solana including myself who always invest in solana, and what I like about solana is that the volume is good and very suitable for long term investment or it could be short term investment. so my choice is solana

It's been proven that the Matic network is better than Solana, because today's news is Solana really has a big problem,
many user wallets have been hacked, of course this makes Solana really bad in terms of security,
even though we know that SOL was predicted to be better than Ethereum, but in reality NO!, so my advice stay away from SOL and buy Matic!

I agree with you that for now Matic is better than Solana, because Solana has been hacked several times.
Basically Solana and Matic are good projects and have strong backers and investors. At first Solana developed faster than Matic, but lately Solana has some network and security problems, So its reputation is starting to weaken.

You need to choose from how you understand the system. The advantages and the disadvantages are always

there for each project that we invest our money, we need to look deeper and see if how things will generate good profits
for such risk that we take during our investment.

If you think that Matic will be the best one for you and a worth to spare your money, then the proceeding is the best followup
for your investment.

In todays current events, I believe polygon doing great this year than Solana which currently having an hacked issue again that hackers exploited 5-6 million dollars which is a negative news apparently. While MATIC is having an outstanding updates everyday left and right, partnerships and all that will surely put MATIC contention over Solana this year.

I think Solona is better than Matic because we can see how developers build various programs through the solona platform. although many people say Matic is also a good platform and has the potential to improve in the future but for me solona is the best. now and in the future. and please look for more information about these two platforms

Solana is still better then polygon and solana have more advance features then polygon even ethereum contract. on the other hand polygon is like ethereum network and they haven’t much advance features. So i think solana must better then polygon network

I think we should invest on both solana and matic. We don't know exactly that which one will give us huge profit. For me, both coins are potential and these will be increasing gradually. It is not good decision to buy a single coin for getting huge profit.

I think the similarity that matic has compared with eth make matic somehow has the advantage, there is definitely a reason why many projects that migrated from eth choosing matic, there's big chance that it's due to the similarity of the ecosystem.
moreover these migrated coins didn't really need some additional features that solana offers, though it's true that both of them are such a good investment in the long term.

Yea, most people and also beginners prefer eth so solona is still getting attention eventhough there're some stuff happended these few months. However, I belive this is like a personal preference, use the one that you think is easy and suits you the most is always the best choice.

Solana coins looks keep stable although have many bad issues with exploit hold assets saving on Solana network like Phantom and Sollet io, I think still better choose Polygon than Solana, I worry with exploit impact will make Solana coin drop drastically. Until few days exploit happen have thousand million dollar stolen and bad reputation when all hacked assets sold, drastically will make Solana coins dump but until few days with stolen assets happen still not drastically make Solana coin dump, but keep be careful maybe one day later will make Solana coin price drop again.

In light of what is happening with solana, I think we should reconsider the use of this coin in the future. Solana was too hasty in their development, they skipped a lot of security mechanisms to become the fastest blockchain today, and the price they paid was the constant problems and almost cannot be remedied. Matic is a layer 2 project but for the investment it is worth more, solana a layer 1 blockchain has too many problems.

Layer 1 or 2, both seems plagued with problems that are unheard for project like this. If their ecosystem isn't stable and maintains good security, investors will stay away. For me, I prefer none of MATIC or Solana right now till they're fully mature projects similar to ETH 2-3 years ago.

I can't fully agree with your words. Yes it's true that Solana have more volume , Rank and features but that doesn't should  underestimating Polygon. If you are looking for cheapest gass fee then it is polygon . Yes solana have much features on nft . But all over things I think polygon also have bright future.

matic and solona are the same for me, but recent events have made me afraid and slowly withdraw from this network, even though they have found where their damage is but it will not make SOL return to the way it used to be

I choose polygon and it's smartchain it's easier, faster smarter and it's wallet and smartchain is compacted to almost all wallet. The Solona Blockchain to me I still don't understand it more.

Before it's a yes, that Solana is a worthy contender. But if you're going to consider it today, I don't think that you'll still say the same thing again.
The outages, the hacks, these things that have happened to Solana. They're no longer normal or healthy. If it's to the other projects that have happened, it will be canceled by its investors but today, many still can't believe why it is happening there. If we're going to compare it today, we can say that matic is going to be the ideal choice since the recent issues against Solana has happened.

both are promising altcoins but I prefer solana because the price of polygon (matic) is stable and I don't like investing in altcoins that have relatively stable prices. Solana continues to develop and has a great future, very confident of its great potential in the future.

I would say that both of these coins are pretty good and we should invest in both of them proportionately.
Currently I am holding more of SOL and less of MATIC but over time I am planning to increase my bag of MATIC.
It has shown some nice gains and is a worthy competitor and can turn out to be multibagger.

If we want to be certain and safer, we should choose ethereum or bitcoin, depending on our investment preferences. The majority of my portfolio is bitcoin and ethereum, but besides that i also have small investments in other projects and are classified as venture capital. I do with this investment is to invest in top layer 1 and layer 2 projects, as well as sometimes some shitcoins, but not too much, since I just consider it as a gamble for entertainment.

Both are good but I prefer Solana.
From my opinion, I think Solana is more promising. The popularity of Solana Blockchain is increasing day by day.
The presence of Solana Blockchain in some of the best projects is growing significantly.

We have to manage the portfolio to add the main coins are Bitcoin and ETH for 75% investment fund allocation but it depends on each investment strategy. I think the rest are invested in the top 20 altcoins (except coin memes) and I ignore shitcoin investments because the risk of loss is high with no guaranteed recovery price to cover losses.

With the recent wallet hack it was evident that Solana is getting more popular with hackers as well as around 8000 wallets were hacked and millions lost. This added with their recurring network issues they had a few months back, i doubt how they are going to instill the confidence in the investors and new projects on how they can deliver when more issues are popping up every now and then  ;).

Polygon and Solana are top coins worth buying, both have promising futures. So I think it would be better if we invest in both, moreover
the performance of the two coins is also not much different, therefore if possible why not invest in both. Moreover, the profit that we will
generate will be maximized if we invest in several coins. And investing in top coins such as Polygon and Solana which has a fairly high demand,
it will be very profitable. But if I had to choose one, I agree with you that Solana is slightly better. It is proven that Solana's ranking on
the coinmarketcap site is above Polygon. So if I have to choose between Polygon or Solana, I just like you will choose Solana.

dont forget solana in the past several times facing problem with its network. Developers team must improve its network to avoid same accident in future. Solana or matic were good , both of them trying to solve problem in eth network., but solana ecosystem growth faster than matic.

I prefer Solana and this is one of my portfolios too, although yesterday there was a negative issue but Solana was able to answer it and hopefully Solana will survive with some problems that come

until now, both of them still give dominantly positive comments to their retainers. however, between the two, I prefer to use Polygon Matic over Solana. maybe I'm used to this. I also feel that Polygon has potential like BNB. however, everyone has their own preferences. however, both are still very good so far. maybe, I will also use solana a lot in the future.

I will not invest in too many tokens, 20 tokens is too much and I think if there is growth, it is not possible to optimize profits because not all coins increase simultaneously. I only choose 5 coins with potential to invest and DCA if necessary.

As for shitcoin, I only choose 1 or 2 coins. The higher the risk, the higher the return, which is why I class them as venture capital and invest only a very small amount of capital in them, treating them like a gamble or a lottery ticket.

Without any doubt my personal choice is MATIC, I really like its multi-level platform. Its have huge potential to grow more in the coming days.

Matic is a more robust blockchain than Solana in terms of network acceptability monthly active users and general scalability.
Solana has had more hacks outages and other problems than the polygon network which is more secure
user satisfaction is lower on Solana than on Polygon since the network is not ethereum virtual machine compliant tokens from other popular networks like avalanche fantom optimism and more are thus incredibly difficult to bridge to Solana.
Polygon allows users to seamlessly and affordably hop between evm compatible networks as a result it's easy and cheap to implement incentive programmes on new networks like near aurora and optimism.
in the end Matic is best choice.

It is undeniable that MATIC can be an alternative. As we know this is layer 2 of ETH, besides that the transaction fees are much cheaper. It is undeniable that this network is not as well-known as Solana, but when compared from a security perspective, MATIC can be said to be much better.

Matic & Solana this two blockchain is now very popular and very strong like Ethereum & Binance Smart Chain but Solana blockchain have some new advantage on there Contact creation and there block explore . so i support solana is more strong then polygon

None, I'd like to choose BNB or ETH over both Matic and Solana cuz they're full of problems. The smart contract market is very crowded right now. I think there's a clash between those smart contract tokens and only the best stay and stuck up all dev. BNB with Binance's backup. ETH is soon to address fees in ETH 2.0 after the PoS transition. All of that sound like the smart contract section will bear a lot of pressure from BNB and ETH.

So consider polygon and solana. Both projects' built-in reason is to be an ethereum alternative. Though polygon is known to be an ethereum alternative, solana has become an ethereum killer right now. And in this case, solana is far better than a polygon. I am not the biggest fan of polygons like Solana. I really liked the Solanos NFT Project because it was all about blockchain games and staking features. And you know what, how Solana started and proved itself by growing a polygon couldn't prove that much. But it does not mean Polygon is not a great project. It really is a top-notch project, but I am a fan of Solana. It's your opinion. Others may be different. Thank you.

Talking about Bitcoin competitors. Ethereum is more senior than Polygon and Solana smart contracts. But Ethereum has not dreamed of becoming a competitor to Bitcoin.

I use Polygon more often than Solana. Both for trading coins and in terms of making transactions. Nonetheless, this blockchain can develop rapidly. This is also due to the recent increase in Ethereum blockchain transaction fees. So that new token developers prefer to use Polygon and Solana. If you are used to it then it is difficult for users to leave it. Although Ethereum blockchain transaction fees are back to normal.

agreed that matic by far still has so many potential left in the long term.
moreover there are quite many projects migrating over matic from Eth that means it could increase matic fames in the long run.
the thing with matic is that it's so similar with Eth that even if some projects makes migration from Eth in order to avoid the high fee, it'll be like the same ecosystem.

Matic is much better than SOLANA, this has been proven, since the hacking incident that occurred on the Solana network,
SOL has been affected, the price of SOL has dropped and the trust of investors and holders seems to have started to have problems,
of course this will make Matic more known to holders of SOL and possibly will move to Matic!

There has been some negative hacking news about Solana every now and then which makes me worried and I do not feel confident in investing a big portion of my portfolio in Sol.
However, Matic seems to be a promising coin and I will prefer to invest in Matic.

It's better to minimize the risk as much as possible and with the negative news related to Solana, of course we will be a little hesitant to invest it,
I think you made the right decision by investing in Matic,
but before that we need to check the news so we don't make the wrong decision

After hacking news and exploit with Solona network still not bad impact with Solana coin going drop, I think still worth and keep profitable for investing with Solana coin than Polygon Matic. But always do your own research because after hacking news will have bad news later with Solana coin get dump again. I think right now better with short term trading if you want entry with Solana coin for preparing if later price get dump again with new hacking information.

Do you prefer safe or fast? Fast is not always good, you can see the problems Solana has had in the past, frequent network outages and most recently the slope wallet attack that took a heavy toll on investors.

Solana blockchain is really the fastest network I have experienced but it has too many problems, solana needs to do a lot to improve its blockchain network or it will soon be superseded by new blockchains.

I will bet for MATIC than Solana, POLYGON platform continues to grow and now more and more developers are entering the MATIC network which is proven to be better than ERC and BSC, I think just wait 2 or 3 years then I believe MATIC price can reach at least $100, or up more than 100x.

polygon is not a NFT ecosystem. polygon is a layer 2 solution for ethereum . thats why polygon was adopted so much fast and matic token price went sky high. And the solana is a non evm chain that trying to make a different ecosystem like ethereum without coping ethereum . You ask polygon or solana? the utility of those 2 ecosystems are completely different mate.

Matic is the winner hands down, solana is messing everything up, from a hack to another hack right from the start, it seems that the team can't fix things up once and for all, or they are benefiting from the hack themselves who knows? Anyways Matic is obviously the winner.

New advantage? But what could that be? I am not aware of that. Maybe that can make solana stronger but I don't think others will just sit and see the success of this coin. I believe that they will also make an update that will surely turn heads as opposed to what solana did right there. In terms of price polygon is much cheaper. This is one of its assets to attract investors that are seeking for cheap yet quality coins.

Another thing that makes them invest on the coin is that polygon rarely have its own ath. We have some threads here in fact that speculates about the future value of polygon. Some says it will reach 20 usd while others says 3 digits.

It's best to limit your investment to a few coins in order to reduce risks of loss as much as possible. Among the two coins mentioned by the OP, MATIC is definitely a better choice than Solana. It's much more secure, decentralized, and it's directly compatible with EVM (Solidity) smart contracts from the ETH blockchain. Because of this, we could say MATIC is extremely undervalued.

Solana, on the other hand, is driven by hype, but it's highly centralized and unstable. I don't get why the coin is still among the top ranks in market cap after it faced several network outages and a massive wallet hack. Maybe whales don't want SOL to go anywhere soon? I wouldn't care since I've never invested in Solana. People are free to do what they want, so ultimately the market will decide which coins will stay and which will become history. Just my thoughts ;D

My personal opinion PLEASE DON'T JUDGE ME 🛑
despite the various fact i completely hate Solana Ecosystem Although they are really good fast transaction speed, Alternative of Eth but main reason to hate is Their is numerous of Exploit and hack happening frequently like Recent Slope Wallet hack earlier Solana block Exploit By bots 😐 due to all these reasons i am trying to avoid Solana Ecosystem Because i am also the victim of these Sol hacks but Definitely with time team is improving and making themselves Better Ecosystem due to Increased in number of games and nfts people are buying Sol token that's shown in its price that's currently around 45$

But on the other hand Matic is just best they are making partnership with a lot of project like Disney and many more The team is really active In these Crash we seen that Matic had done good, Currently trading at 1$

I think both of these coin perform good but Definitely Solana had break my Trust Let's hope for the best 😉

I think the problem not with Solana coins but also with wallet exploit depending where save their assets, I saw hacked assets happen with Slope wallet and not any connected with Solana coins, maybe the most responsibility with exploit wallet is developer of Slope wallet and they need give official announcement about what happen with exploit wallet. Looking with Solana coins keep stable and reaching higher price from $39 where exploit issues and right now Solana success make higher price until $47. Not any problem with Solana coins and still profitable if want invest there.

In fact, I will call both coins better. Because these two coins are very good. And if the market is good, these two coin holders will benefit a lot. As soon as the bear market starts, the price drops completely. And now the price has increased. So these two coins are very good in my opinion

Solona and Matic are included in my portfolio, therefore I won't miss out on these two currencies because they offer distinct things.
It's sad to overlook the immense possibilities of long-term solona and Matic, Because these two coins are very good.

Coins are still fairly easy in the cryptocurrency world, but have very different system developments, both of them have a big influence in terms of growth in the Crypto world, maybe Solana is not very successful in the market even more prominent growth is Polygon where polygon is an ETH-based network that makes Polygon is more dominant than Solana, and it can't be denied if we compare Polygon with Solana, And it's very clear that Polygon is more in the interest of the upper class.

I would much rather invest in Polygon over Solana. Solana is full of marketing hype while Polygon has real partners like Disney and Coca Cola. Additionally, holding MATIC gives you airdrops like the upcoming MAXX finance token launch. If you go to their website you can sign up for their free claim and 5k MATIC giveaway. Plus, it's easy to stake MATIC on stader for 10% APY.

I choose Solana to Polygon, and as more and more significant projects switch to it, I'm hopeful that in a year, Solana will even be compared to ethereum. Because of Solana's various benefits and suitability for creating major projects like DeFi and NFT, developers employ it.
These small boards are created by users and some experts to help the platforms know the advantages and weaknesses of their competitors, then confirm the needs of the market since then, major platforms have the appropriate advantage. occasionally comparability systems are designed as just an approach by public perception and users to place pressure on a particular platform, which is the case with Ethereum and BSC then Solana, nearly all have structure statistics for speed and cost, it's not to impress users, these little boards are created by users and some experts to help the platforms know the Users consistently defend their interests in silence and favor the more reliable, older platform over the more recent one.

Matic remains my current choice. because I heard the news about matic in collaboration with several large companies. so I will start buying it gradually for me to save and hope to get a lot of profit later. I know the risks taken. but I think matic has good potential at the moment.

If you have more money, you should invest in both, both are very promising, neither should be ignored.

But if I could only pick one, I think I would choose Matic over Sol, with polygon I see better growth potential than Sol, their prices are still relatively low so the potential for profit is better. Solana has grown a lot and with the recent incidents, Solana needs a lot of time to regain the community's trust.

In my honest opinion, Matic and Solana are both good long-term holdings, but if you ask me which of the two smart contracts I would use, I would prefer to use Matic compared to Solana, because at least I saw the its features and functions compared to solana. Although I'm not saying that SOL is bad to use, it's because I haven't tried it yet. So I don't feel like using it so far.

But if I were to buy only one of the two, I would still prefer the matic, because its higher and updates development so far is good and I don't see anything bad in what they are planning for their communities. And Matic also has a lot of advantages if I compare him to Solana, and this is a different topic as always.

For now I prefer MATIC, and happy because I bought around 900 MATIC when the price was around 78 cents and now it's 95 cents even yesterday it passed $1, I'm sure in 2022 the price of MATIC can approach the ATH that ever happened, which was $2.7, a golden opportunity for those of us who want to get big profits by investing MATIC.

Solana is now in some trouble , many wallets been hacked but still no fix yet!
For me I support Matic, but I think its good time to buy some Solana. The ecosystem of Solana is busy and many new dapps moved to the chain!

Both I use often and both have their own merits and demerits, many other ecosystems or products are built from them, but neither has reached the stage of great success I have observed.
The question is in which way Solana can compete with Bitcoin, this is still far enough to compare Solana with Bitcoin itself

According to what I see these two Altcoins are very good to choose, because I see both have very good potential in the future, but if I had to choose, I would choose Matic Polygon because there are many things I like about the Matic Polygon network and also very make it easier for people to transact with very low gas costs.

The constant hacking of Solana wallets makes it more vulnerable in investing in Solana, I learnt that the recent hack also targeted accounts that has been inactive for up to six months, imagine thinking that you have your coin saved in a private wallet and eventually you found that you have been hacked. If not for the hacking issue I prefer Solana more than polygon matic. Both coin are strong fundamentally but I think that Solana is more way ahead of matic

Both have upsides and downsides based on my experience in doing transactions with them. What I like for both MATIC and SOL is that both have extremely cheap transaction fees.

As for the downside, MATIC sometimes is subject to network congestions that would lead to the transaction being delayed either for participating in token sales, buying an NFT, etc. As for Solana, they have numerous network outages from time to time.

So for now, I remained both neutral in both of them.

Hacked cases usually if happening with team its self give bad impact with price going dump, but I think what happened with Solana exploit on Slope wallet this mistake not from Solana developer. I think all trader if save their fund on wallet ever get hack, I got twice hacked and loss much money when saving my assets on myetherwallet. I don't think what mistake I made because suddenly loss my fund without connecting yet with my wallet to exchange dapp like Uniswap or other dapp exchange.

Everyone who has spent some time with crypto has probably heard of these two assets. Both assets are fundamentally strong and still have a good position in the current market. Among these two, one is a less price and the other is comparatively high price. I personally think both are suitable for investment. Now if one consider about less investment amount then he can easily invest in Matic or Polygon. There are many new smart contracts being developed. Which will be able to move to a better position in the future.

Extra security is the best defense. If you do care about your funds, it's always good to go deeper with doing your research to avoid

any possible attacks with your wallet, if you know how to use some extra layer of security, your funds
is safer than those who don't have anything, though hackers are hackers and if they really wanted to
penetrate the chance still open for them. You just need to be more cautious about anything you will do while
inside this business.

I think Matic is very convincing, for 2 months up almost 100%, I once bought matic when the price of 42 cents and now the price is around 95 cents and even yesterday it has reached $ 1, I'm sure the August price can be stable at $ 1.

Solana in his project development is very good, projects published on the Solana network are also often successful in appearing in the market, no wonder Solana is said to be the best alternative network project under BNB.
Polygon matic is no less good, low cost, simple network because it is similar to ethereum makes it easier for everyone to understand polygon matic wallets.
There's nothing bad between the two, but I prefer Solana, because solana earns a lot for me.

There are few projects I am really into and they are running on solana, this is what makes me have less zeal for the projects,  why solana? I have less confidence on this project because my gut keeps telling me that it could be the next Luna.

We should look more into the cryptocurrency's stability/reliability rather than the features it provides. Despite Solana being extremely fast and cheap to use, it's not a coin you can trust for the long haul because of its unstable Blockchain network. MATIC is a much better option, because it makes a balance between decentralization and scalability. One project worth mentioning here is Avalanche. It's a smart contract platform that's compatible with the EVM (just like MATIC), but takes a different approach to scalability.

I think both AVAX and MATIC are extremely undervalued considering their potential to change the "De-Fi" space for the better. I don't get why Solana is still among the top coins in market cap, after all it's been through since its inception. Constant network outages and hacks would force anyone to get out of the SOL "blockchain" as soon as possible. Yet, whales are "pumping" it for some reason. At least, everything is open-sourced these days. If Solana fails, there's nothing stopping the community from creating a fork that puts decentralization above all else. Just my opinion :)

I tend to prefer POLYGON MATIC because it is a decentralized protocol for building and connecting multiple Ethereum compatible blockchain networks, so many call it “Ethereum’s Internet of blockchain” because it creates a multi-chain ecosystem that can be shared and attached to Ethereum.
but operates separately from Ethereum. It has its own blockchain network and applications.
however, the Polygon Matic app is compatible with the Ethereum network and vice versa.

No one is comparing Solana with bitcoins. We are comparing solana with polygon Matic. Although both coins are good one so it is wise to invest in both of the coins to gain maximum benefit.
Also remember, that we should have bitcoin as a major portion of our portfolio.

In addition to the recent wallet-related hack, the Solana network has crashed several times in the past as well, further raising doubts about the future of this blockchain. Having to talk about the speed and cost of gas, solana deserves to be number 1 but the frequent network outage makes me afraid to invest a lot in solana. If I could only choose between the two, I would choose Matic as well.

Ithink both bro solana is good but ithink matic also is good soon matic will be 15 usdt soon like solona and ithink next eth will be solana in the next bullrun comming

Yes, if asked to choose both, they are indeed very good blockchain projects, in fact these two coins are ranked at the top of coinmarketcap,
Solana is at Rank 9, and Matic is at rank 14, but I prefer Matic, because Matic has far more use cases than Matic. SOL,
matic is used for gas fees in NFT marketplace, of course this is what makes Matic much more favourite

matic will surely score new ATH in the future, there's just less bad news accompanying matic and i'm sure it will get even higher considering that it's just the beginning for matic in term of increasing its valuation.
even though if eth could solve its gas and reduced its fee it could then again take the market capitalization share of matic but I think matic could still grow in the long run since the metaverses are mostly already in matic.

Your valuable feedback is much appreciated. People don't understand when to compare what to what.

I always like to draw polygon. I'm still solona do not use However, both currencies have become quite popular since long ago.

Something that might threaten Matic in terms of transaction fees if ETH will solve that particular feature,

but like your observation, metaverses are mostly in Matic chain and with that the usages of this chain will create more developers and
investors new projects to support and create.

In the long run, Matic will gain good valuation. As long as the team is progressive, the chance is high for Matic holders to earn decently.

If that's what you mean, in this case I choose both, because of personal experience, I have benefited from Solana and Matic, even though the current case, these two coins are not in good condition.
While bitcoin is the dream of everyone who is here or not, maybe it's time for us to invest in small amounts

Problem advantages may be this will be very different. Because basically, as far as we have used the two coins, it may be the case that you prefer Metic just for the reasons you mentioned, especially since these two coins are in the top 15 of Coinmarketcap.

So it's hard to make sense of the best. But to be precise, regarding the needs that people want to use, perhaps in this matter the judgment will emerge

Thank you friend.
That's actually a comparison, must have a match between each other. Otherwise, the balance will never exist

The Solana protocol is designed in such a way that it is capable of creating a decentralized application which is called DApp. Due to its speed , low cost as well as payments sent to the Solana channel can be verified in seconds. It's average cost is $0.00025. Additionally, Solona is also known as an Ethereum killer. It has a transaction speed of up to 65,000 TPS. Polygon, on the other hand, is also ahead. Especially in terms of speed, Polygon is the fastest of the three blockchain (ETH,SOL,MATIC) protocols with up to 75,000 TPS. I personally prefer solana.

i would prefer both to be long term assets.
because these two coins are coins that have high popularity at the moment and will probably be more and more interested in the future after the voters of the two coins develop the project.
i'm sure if it's for the long term choosing both is the right choice for the long term

Comparing these two coins in my opinion, it is very difficult to choose one,
because both are indeed good projects in fundamentals, the roadmap is running smoothly and there are no problems,
but indeed in terms of price, of course, Matic can still reach 10x higher than SOL, why? because Matic is still at rank 15,
while SOL is already at rank 9, of course the more the marketcap the more the price goes up, so now I choose Matic.

Both are good coins and worth it for long term assets because the current price is too low, but every altcoin must be analyzed in futures so we have to make sure both are still viable for long term investment because the bad impact of altcoins can fall at any time without us knowing the prediction.

for today if i have to choose between polygon or solana. then my choice remains unchanged, namely choosing polygon or matic. because so far a lot of good news that is always presented by polygons. even looking at the price its pretty good. when the price of another coin experienced a very deep fall when BTC underwent a correction. but Matic can keep the price from falling too sharply. although there will be a decline. but so far the positive signal is shown by the matic user community. because every time there is a decline there is always a large accumulation of community.
although the decline can still occur because BTC seems like it will still experience a deeper correction. so stay careful. we must enter at the right time and not in a hurry. enter according to analysis and common sense. control emotions and mentality.

for solana i expect a lot of improvement there. Solana actually has high potential. but people have doubts after many reports of troubles happening from solana. But if solana can show improvement and be consistent with a good system during this year and next year. I'm sure the Solana community will grow rapidly again. but I'm not in the mood for solana at the moment.

The very reason why you should continue updating yourself if you are into this investment, there are huge changes that might

happen along the way and factors that will affect the value of your hold assets, like with the example you mentioned. We really never
know if what will be the future of a certain asset.

at once the value is rising so hard but after that the value will be dumped to the point that it will be abandoned by the community
including the team who creates the coin and moves to another project.

I think both the coins are superb in their own way but  POLYGON’S MATIC is powerful in future because it provides better transaction limit with less margin, Solana is best investment for beginners  who tried to know the flow and get the decent profits... Just split your investment on both ;) ;) ;) ;)

It seems to me both are worthy to invest. But the most preferred of the two is Matic. Where there has been a lot of investment on this ecosystem. In this year especially when it went into dip positions some whales invested heavily in this platform. consequence of large investment, matic price increase from 34 cents to $1. In the upcoming bull market, it will over pass its previous record.

Honestly both are one of the most popular currencies facing the highest volatility however currently as of august 2022

Matic has faced insane pump inside this bearish market which i think we should be careful when investing to Matic in this hard time (it might dump very hard if btc goes 17k) i estimate $0.4 in that case.

Solana is currently facing hard time in this bear market all it does is drop and face some resistance in the bottom around $35.

Overall both coins are extremely risk to invest in (compared to other top alt coins)

If I have to choose from this, then I will choose both. Because both of them have been in the crypto market for a while now and both of them have proven to be very reliable, and you can trust both of them. As for the price for sol and MATIC, it both of them keep developing the system, then they will become a powerful platform in the future. So I won't pick one over the other. I pick both.

i'm very sure that matic in the future gonna increase its value significantly, it's ecosystem is closer with ETH, so many metaverse migrating to matic making matic better than solana.
right now famous high quality metaverse moving in matic platform, even if eth solved its fee i think these metaverse will still in solana platform, in the future once metaverse becomes a thing again, matic will gain high increase in its value, i'm sure it will even surpass solana.

when a project decides to add to much to look excessively difference from other or exiting wallet, this is what you will see. However, they open themselves to a very strange challenge with hack/insecurity. Both Matic and Binance built their wallet on the existing provision of ethereum and such provision has already been evaluated with the security details. I can trust the security of Binance, Matic and ethereum than that of solana, security seems to be the most important thing as a hodler

Many NFT and metaverse based platforms are switching to matic (polygon) networks because of low transaction fees. But the bearish phase makes NFT transactions decrease because of the main influence of the declining market, So if the hype of NFT and Metaverse has decreased then will polygon chains dominate for traders because ETH transaction costs have also decreased and we have an alternative to smartchain chains.

Matic still not problem right now but their network looks slowly when sending coin process, different with Solana network although last several weeks have trouble with exploit. But that not all mistake from Solana because exploit happened on Slope wallet not with Solana development. Matic and Solana I think worth for investing, but small money for investing better choose Matic coins as long investment way than Solana coins have been on $35.

Both platforms have their advantages, so it's hard to choose between the two. and so far I have chosen both as long term investments. because these two platforms have tremendous potential in the future. Matic and Solona have a good vision and their development is very good from time to time, and this shows that this platform has the consistency to continue to develop this platform in the future.

if I have to choose one of the two then I will choose Polygon Matic. because I think polygon Matic has better popularity than solona. and matic are more in demand than solana. polygon matic has been supported by opensea market which makes matic even better in terms of volume. and transaction fees using polygon wallet are still very cheap than some other smart contracts.

Both platforms are suitable for investment. solana is capable of 3000 to about 65000 transactions per second. Another Matic is also capable of 65000 transactions per second. There is no way to underestimate any of the two. But many people are investing Sol and Matic based on the amount of investment. In recent times people have invested more in Matic because it is available at a relatively low price. But Solana's ATH was $259 which still attracts investors greatly.

I also have the same choice as you, Polygon Matic is a crypto project that brings a specially designed and integrated suite of tools to the entire blockchain ecosystem. this promises to alleviate the challenges facing the Ethereum blockchain.
I think Polygon has promising prospects especially in the long term when its objectives are fully achieved. if so, Matic's price prediction is positive for the future.

Solana also a Good Project, but I like Matic. Polygon Matic has a long term future Roadmap, also a very cheap fee of transactions like BNB, the price will increased in next bull run. I think matic on $100 probably easily.

If I was asked to choose a top altcoin for me, it's very good, because I invested in both, be it Matic or Solana,
because indeed the future of these two projects is very good, it looks like these two coins are able to be in the top 100,
even though Matic and Solana were in the top 100. lower rank,
of course this is an extraordinary achievement because investors will also feel comfortable if Matic and Sol are in the top altcoins

ill go for matic for now this matic is a potential coin matic is no reach the 100 usd up while solona allready matic is a cheap price for me right now and its good buy matic for long term for me.

 Both Matic and Solana are good to invest. You can choose both of them if you have enough capital to invest. But for me Matic is good for long term because of it's value now which is still cheaper,better to buy and hold for long term. Solana is also good to hold for long term but I also traded it to accumulate small profit in a short period of time. Both coin has a good future.

for me polygon chains are quite reliable and affordable from all sorts of technicalities.
if you have a budget that is budgeted try to divide 30% for the three chains. Anticipate if you see the shine of a chain. Assume that you are saving for the future. You will not regret when the trend and Ath change again. If you choose one, consider luck not on your side, then you have to be more patient. The percentage will be seen if you have watched the 3 chains for investment or scalping your nft transactions.

I personally do not use solana but i am fine with poligon matic which perhaps will become my main altcoin instead of eth and then costs less than solana you can stock up for a possible pump

in the last few days it has been seen that MATIC is slightly ahead of solana and several other major altcoins in terms of maintaining the price in the current bearish phase. this can be proven from MATIC's ranking which rose drastically from 18th to 12th in CMC.
if there is no more price decline from BTC I'm sure in the next few days the price of matic can touch $ 1 again.

Polygon or Matic or Solona Token is strong and very good quality token no matter what you are and these are two top ten tokens because here if you want to increase your token and your profit you can invest in Polygon or any other token and also you can invest your tokens.  You can leave it well but you can use polygon here if you say there is no network tie less network then you cut two cents it is normal I like network very much that's why I use polygon thank you

Solana coins tend to be higher in price than Matic Polygon, of course everyone will buy Matic instead of Solana, with prices that have soared they are very vulnerable to being dropped, so that's why some people buy Matic Polygon...

The difference in supply and price is very basic so there is no specific difference between Matic and Solana, the important point is to analyze for potential investment for future bullish preparation, so I think both are good coins but I tend to choose Solana investment because the pattern of movement is higher for recovery than price Matic is holding below $1 even though the main market price is rising. But don't forget that they are only altcoins, so consider the risks and set a lower allocation of funds than bitcoin investments for the long term.

Solana, I think it's riskier. several times there have been hacks and problems in the Solana network. yes, it is natural with a growing platform will certainly face problems. but seeing the impact on the price is huge.
I also have Solana but I will have more Matic than Solana. that's my assessment. I think everyone has their thoughts.

it isn't always the case.  Not because a certain coin is cheaper, it is the better buy.  Always consider the total supply of the cryptocurrency.  Solana with 508,180,963 total supply against 10,000,000,000 of Polygon, Solana would be a better choice since Solana has way lower in terms of supply cap.  But I always think that diversifying investment is a good move, so if anyone feels they are both profitable in the future, then why limit in just 1 investment?  Besides there is no law saying invest only in 1 cryptocurrency, better take advantage of everything that will give us future profit.

matic had gone up at $1.02 last August before finally dropping and you could be right mate that maybe matic would be able to break through again at $1 and it's not that difficult if we look at the previous matic trend which was at $2 at the beginning of this year. the sol is also not so bad when it started the year at $170 and is currently down and is at $33. so actually both are equally good if they are going to be used as investments, now it's just a matter of how to express that the value needed is certainly different, sol needs more funds than matic and that will clearly affect what we will do in buying it.

There is no doubt that MATIC developments will continue to be positive, currently there are many NFT, DEX and other projects that use the MATIC network so that it will continue to increase, while SOLANA still has many shortcomings such as the case that has occurred, namely network errors and making users have to wait more than 3 hours to get 3 transaction confirmations.

Both project are too class and we shouldn't miss any one. Solona has good Partnership in NFts as you mentioned in post and also has web 3 project like StepN. Reddit maybe bring NFt in Solona Blockchain.
Matic is also good and have top class NFt and Opensea. Many gaming project launched and much more in future.

In my opinion, Solona is better than Matic, because we can see how the developers build various programs through the SOL platform. I think despite the many people saying that Matic is also a good platform and has the potential to grow in the future. But For me Solana Is one of the best Altcoin for now and in the future. for these two platforms I continue to see and follow the development. and this makes me more interested in finding information about good platforms

in fact, if you want to invest in these two coins, there is no need to doubt it for the long term. because it has been proven that when the bulls came, the two coins had given a hefty price to make a profit.
well, it's true that you always do an analysis before making long-term investments on the grounds that altcoins are very high-risk. but if you really want a safer investment, choosing bitcoin or ethereum is much safer.

well, both have good potential for long-term investment, Poliygon and Solana are coins that are currently popular and attract my attention.
but now for long-term investment I prefer Matic because the price is still relatively affordable for me.
Even though Solana was hacked several times and network problems did not rule out in the future I will invest in Solana, because I believe Solana will be better in the future.

You need to work with a lot of research before taking your investment with whatever assets you think will bring you a good amount of profits.

There are chances that you will see a dump, but if you know the drill and you understand how things work with
your chosen project, you can simply ignore what the market condition currently, else you will find it as good
Opportunities to add more, same deal with both Matic and Sol. If you see a dump buy more and wait till the time
the market bounces back and rally high.

Yes the two coins between Matic and Solana are potential altcoins,
it never hurts to invest in both and in the long run it looks like it will be profitable,
and in the midst of current conditions where the market is bearish I think this is a good time to buy it

Matic has always been my best choice since 2020, because until now, Matic has not had any network problems,
even Matic has become one of the blockchains to be used as NFT fees of course this is a good thing,
because the greater the demand from the matic will make the price more expensive.

In my opinion Both Solana and Maric is a good and also both are top altcoins. Bith altcoins are best to invest and both have a great potential will be rise up and also we can take profit from both altcoins

I'm more interested in Polygon than Solana. Besides we can use the same wallet as Ethereum or BSC. Many Dex platforms have been developed through the Polygon blockchain. This can help us in making transactions as well as in buying tokens from the Polygon blockchain. But Solana is also a good coin. But if we say competitor BTC, I also think it is still very far from expectations, because to compete with Ethereum alone is not yet capable, how can it compete with Bitcoin as the king of crypto.

personally i am agree with this opinion , the thing that matic should do only improve their ecosystem as soon as possible so demand to matic will increase too just like eth bnb or solana. matic still have big gap with another layer 1 blockchain and we have to take attention it as best opportunity ever. in 2 years matic price could move above $20 based on my own opiniion.

I always include Solana and Polygon in my portfolio list, because indeed the two coins are very profitable for investment and have utility.
So it's really hard if I have to choose between Solana and Polygon, but because Solana's market cap is bigger and Solana has a higher demand,
so I prefer Solana over Polygon. But that doesn't mean Polygon is bad, it's just like you said Polygon still have to improve their network to be
much better, so that the demand for polygons also increases.

I'm sure the Polygon development team is able to develop Polygon into a better project, which is definitely not a bad idea to make Polygons
for investment. So like I said before I always include Solana and Polygon in my portfolio list, because they are really potential coins.
So my advice is indeed if we want to invest with maximum profit, it is better to invest in both, because I believe when the bull market comes,
Solana and Polygon prices will skyrocket and provide huge profits.

Matic looks promising because now many developers are using automatic networks, now the price is still cheap and this is a good opportunity to buy a lot of matic, I'm sure in 2 more years the price can reach at least $ 25.

I prefer MATIC over Solana, many compliments from experts that the MATIC network is very fast and the transaction fees are very cheap, from the developer support side MATIC is very much so that the future of MATIC will be even more brilliant.

I already tried Matic and it was the fastest version of transactions I ever had and also the cheapest of them all. Most of the time when I was playing NFT games back then, the transaction fees were killing the earnings I should have gotten and it all fixed when they managed to migrate to Polygon and give their players a reasonable experience to play their games while only making them pay a cheap price. So far, I haven't encountered any problems and also it has real developers that will gonna continue to improve their product in the future.

I chose matic rather than solana, even though the current ranking position is better than matic but I was once disappointed with solana so I sell all solana, and when viewed from the development in the market it appears that the automatic movement is better than solana, the best opportunity to immediately matic before becoming expensive.

Also, the value of Matic is still affordable. There are many opportunities since the is market still in bear season,

If you can buy and hold for some time, the chance of making good money from this coin is possible,
though it's more on the knowledge that you got after doing your research, crypto always have surprise
to investors and traders who take the time learning the process.

I think Matic is very prospects and promises for the future, this can be seen in a few months when the Matic Market Red continues to rise and is now ranked 11th, this is a sign that the future of matic will be brilliant.

IMO Polygon's closest competitor is the internet computer or NEAR, not Solana. Solana has broken a dozen times already and when discussing blockchains, the most important factor is security. The internet computer ICP runs on decentralized servers, not AWS like most other blockchains.