POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

[Rehan Zakir]

Both are good coins and as well as good Blockchains. I like both coins and holding both coins for long term. Both coins will perform good in future.  So hold both coins at cheap prices. Don't buy it at once wait for dump and then buy it.
Both Blockchains are really fast, transparent and secure.

[1714605002]

1714605002

[Balmain]

The two projects have transparent secure and fast blockchains so I can't tell them apart. Both have millions of investors and large communities. Although SOL is a bit newer, it has come to its current state with huge funding and I believe it will develop further. Both are logical projects to invest in, in my opinion. Looks like they're going to keep being Major for many years.

[ZaraCB]

Between Polygon and Solana I prefer Polygon (Matic) network.  Because its transaction fee is very low and transaction speed is high.
On the other hand, I have not done any transaction in solana network yet. Solana wallet seems strange to me.

[FanEagle]

Both of the cryptocurrencies are good, but I think Solana has a higher security and a bigger hype. Even though the Solana’s ecosystem is bigger in this case, the Polygon’s community is believed to be more stronger than that of Solana. Both of them are good and they have the same aim of improving the scalability issues of the blockchain, though they have different approach to doing that.

In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.

Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.

[Pamadar]

Developers always look for good alternatives when creating project, Matic provides cheaper fees but do have a good quality of services.

Though that's an advantage, I also agree that both are good for investors, definitely depending on how you project your goals between these two good and quality assets.

More on your own interpretations and how well you see the future for both coins, you have to decide according to your proper understanding.

Both are good projects, but only one is truly decentralized. Polygon fits the bill nicely as a decentralized alternative of the ETH blockchain. Solana, on the other hand, is less-decentralized making it extremely-vulnerable to external attacks. The fact that the network was disrupted a while ago, tells us that Solana is not as reliable as we thought it would be.

Ultimately, it all comes down to a person's preference. As long as these coins have strong community backing, they won't be going anywhere soon. Who knows how far Polygon and Solana will go? Just my thoughts

Very good point, it's investor's preference to how to pick between the two,

as long as they are willing to support the asset that they believe to be more successful.
It's them that will invest, by doing deeper analyzation
will help to protect their money.

We don't know what will be the fate of these two coins, all the developments and progress
will be the deciding factor for more success
in the future.

[asyakashi]

Both cannot be doubted. It has its own advantages. However, I tend to polygon when it comes to performance. Plus polygon depends on the new network. I am sure, when solana starts large transaction costs will also be higher. There polygon will be ready to replace solana position.

[herurist]

Both cannot be doubted. It has its own advantages. However, I tend to polygon when it comes to performance. Plus polygon depends on the new network. I am sure, when solana starts large transaction costs will also be higher. There polygon will be ready to replace solana position.

when it comes to gas I think it comes back to their prices.
look at ETH when their prices go up now their gas is very crazy and users are always complaining.
Currently, I also feel that BNB has increased slightly, although not significantly.
and This will also certainly apply to Sol. Their prices are currently slowly rising and continue to get more attention from most people and indirectly they will also have an effect on gas and of course this will continue to increase when indeed they continue to rise

[Abiky]

Both of the cryptocurrencies are good, but I think Solana has a higher security and a bigger hype. Even though the Solana’s ecosystem is bigger in this case, the Polygon’s community is believed to be more stronger than that of Solana. Both of them are good and they have the same aim of improving the scalability issues of the blockchain, though they have different approach to doing that.

In terms of the features that they both has to offer, Polygon has a faster transaction because it makes use of the Proof of Stake mechanism, so the transactions are confirmed in less than two seconds (<2) for every transactions. It aims to solve the issue of scalability, with a higher TPS of 65,000 which is really good if you should compare with daily methods of transactions that we use, such as VISA. Finally it has a lower transaction cost.

Solana also has a lot of features that makes it really good such as the PoH, Turbine, Gulf stream, and a lot more. So it is up to you on which you would choose. But like I said at first, Polygon has a stronger community, while Solana has the highest hype. Hypes don’t last for long, but having a strong community would take a project far.

You've said it yourself. Solana is full of hype. Not like Polygon which is decentralized and has a proven track record of development and innovation. I wouldn't say Solana has a higher security than Polygon, simply because it's been a victim of external attacks (network disruptions) over the course of the year. Developers are now proposing an "observation system" that would greatly centralize the network if implemented. With this, I wouldn't count on SOL as a serious long term investment. Not like Polygon which is a sidechain of the Ethereum blockchain. The network enjoys all of the security and reliability of its parent chain.

Using MATIC would be no different than using ETH (except for the fact that the UX on Polygon is better than ETH with the low fees and fast TX confirmation times). At nearly $3 per coin, I'd say MATIC is extremely undervalued. Who knows if someday MATIC surpasses SOL in market cap? Just my opinion

[Orange89]

Well at the current market  scenario i will pick matic in my bag no doubt both had great volume and both are good but i am still very much positive about Matic price it can go beyond to 10$ in 2022 according to my assumptions as we are seeing alot of new project is launching in the matic Network on the other hand solana had also shown an amazing growth over a past period of time but still i think polygon will be Cheap and it will that hidden gem that i pick

[Jaered]

I think Solana edges it by the skin of  Samo's snarling tooth. Why? Its sharding power and the transaction speed is the upper hand it holds on its opponents. Mind you I rate Polygon too and have quite a bag, but I still think Polygon and Cardano can't hold a candle on Solana. Polkadot comes close

[Twinkledoe]

Well at the current market  scenario i will pick matic in my bag no doubt both had great volume and both are good but i am still very much positive about Matic price it can go beyond to 10$ in 2022 according to my assumptions as we are seeing alot of new project is launching in the matic Network on the other hand solana had also shown an amazing growth over a past period of time but still i think polygon will be Cheap and it will that hidden gem that i pick

Why not both platforms? Both are actually promising to hold. MATIC or SOL, will possibly give you good profits this year. So diversify your portfolio, and keep up with their progress to check where they are heading. Both projects are showing very good sign in the market.

[Rigon]

At present we can see that the polygon matic platform is moving much further from Solana. We now see the location of the Polygon Matic Platform right after the Binance Smart Chain Platform. This polygon metic platform is expected to go a long way in the future.

[prosperoustop]

both! but as for me - matic more comfortable to use! dont understand why someone choose solana?

[Ngewex Yuk]

I've never used the Solana network, but I think the MATIC network which is fast and cheap than BSC or ethereum makes me optimistic that the MATIC network will soon become the first choice of developers, and it is evident that many NFT and Metaverse projects are using MATIC.

[Gorosden]

I've used both and I can say that polygon is more friendly, solana wallet is confusing to many newbies I've seen but I don't care though, I want coins like these two in my portfolio for long term, I believe they will keep growing and growing, Polkadot and Avalanche are a must have too

[bounceback]

These two coins are good choices to be made as investments because they have the potential and can provide a large return due to the increasing popularity of Matic and Solana to date, so far many investors have chosen these two coins to invest, but regardless of the development of these two coins, very good so far, but in terms of security I will choose MATIC over SOL because the security offered by MATIC is more promising.

[JrRini]

I Buy Sell and trade both Solona and Matic.  Of the two, I prefer the Matic Token tie because it is a very good and high quality token.  And it's much faster and safer.  You can invest in matic token with your eyes closed.

[fvb]

In my opinion, these two platforms are worthy. But Polygon gets more preference. It's kind of intuitive. I use it more, but I also consider it promising to invest in SOL. I think they have everything ahead.

[Abiky]

I've never used the Solana network, but I think the MATIC network which is fast and cheap than BSC or ethereum makes me optimistic that the MATIC network will soon become the first choice of developers, and it is evident that many NFT and Metaverse projects are using MATIC.

MATIC is the true winner here since it focuses on decentralization/security/reliability. Its competitor, Solana, has been facing several network outages putting its reliability in question. I wouldn't count on SOL for serious transactions, as the network is too flawed. Not like MATIC which is secured by the main Ethereum blockchain. It's a sidechain after all. The coin is trading below $2, as not many people are aware of its true benefits. Once Polygon gains traction, MATIC will surely go all the way to the moon. Who knows what will be of both chains in the future? Just my thoughts

[Pejoh Asu]

I chose MATIC, many predictions from experts that Matic will continue to grow so that it will become a big platform, even many analysts believe that this year Matic will compete with ERC and BSC.