POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

[irsada]

My choice matic is much more efficient and easy to use just like bsc and eth where the addresses can be combined in different blockchains. while solona I don't really understand how it works and have never tried it.

[Beparanf]

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

Seriously? Ethereum TPS is very low compared on the 2 blockchains being discuss here. Ethereum can't handle big volume of transaction that's why this blockchain exist and its not a redundant if ever Ethereum manage to increase there TPS. This is competition not redundancy so this blockchains will exist and will continue to have user whatever happened to Ethereum.

[killerfrost]

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

[CryptoWarriorsssss]

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

of course  ， both cannt directly compare with ETH

[casperBGD]

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

long-term, Solana is better pick, IMO
Matic is a good project, that is here to stay, but influence will go down with Ethereum2.0 and PoS, and Solana has a complete ecosystem, that could thrive in the future

nevertheless, both are good, and should bring fine returns, as investment, do not take this as financial advise and do your own analysis

[CryptoWarriorsssss]

In fact, POLYGON'S MATIC and Solana are both very good and it's hard to choose between them, but I tend to prefer MATIC a bit more because of the good growth in a year compared to Solana's growth in a year can be clearly seen through the following comparison:



Investing in both coins is good, but for me I prefer investing in Matic because of the good growth in a year as well because its price is low compared to Solana, so you can buy larger quantities at a lower price and store them for a long time.

Thanks for your sharing the image ， but  the price is not a matter

[unusualfacts30]

Matic is cheap at its current rate, it is capable of going close to $2..ath was 2.65. You might want to stock them up for next run. Solana has reached its peak, it will go little higher..likely to make small jump in next run. I like their ecosystem and what they have achieved in small time frame.

[nira09]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions?

Polygon and Solana, both are projects that have good fundamentals, they also have developers who are active in developing their products. Personally, I prefer to invest in Polygon because the price is still around $1 USD, while Solana has already reached $30 USD. $1 to $10 USD should be easier than $30 USD to $300 USD. DYOR

[RussianEnglishTranslation]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.


Polygon had  a well-developed NFT ecosystem with many tools, marketplaces and other products being built on it.

It has more than 150 NFT Dapps and marketplaces like OpenSea already built and working on it.


But Solana is undoubtedly a worthy contender.BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC


lots of the NFT/ game project on Solana ecosystem.

Such as ：$Aurory ，Burnt Fiance ， Solanians

Plus ：  new  NFT marketplace -SolPixel Powered by Solana


what is your options or opinions?

NEAR protocol is superior tech wise to both of those projects.

[killerfrost]

I see at this point it looks like MATIC is still getting more attention, and that's most evident when looking at the current capitalization of both. I think MATIC has a significant potential opportunity with the above motivations to become a strong competitor of layer 2, the ground for MATIC price growth will still have a very prosperous way.

long-term, Solana is better pick, IMO
Matic is a good project, that is here to stay, but influence will go down with Ethereum2.0 and PoS, and Solana has a complete ecosystem, that could thrive in the future

nevertheless, both are good, and should bring fine returns, as investment, do not take this as financial advise and do your own analysis

It's absolutely true that if you look at it long term, Solana will probably yield better returns. But anyway, we are talking about both coins being good and trying to figure out which one is better. At each moment there will be a different feeling before its change.

[asriloni]

Why do you need them when Ethereum is already there, as soon as Ethereum shifts to POS consensus most of this project will become redundant. Also the gas fee has considerably reduced in the past couple of month and if it keeps on reducing then most users will come back to Ethereum ecosystem.

You may right about that but when it already had big community and then the improvement that will be happened in ethereum will not make these blockchain to be disappeared from the market.
That's the same when so many competitors of ethereum appeared in the past. it can always be an alternative solution for the scalability problem of ethereum. Ethereum may get improvement in the future but the implementation could always be different with the expectation. I still prefer matic over Solana.

[kak uli]

I personally prefer and admire Matic, the reason is because I am amazed by the growth of these altcoins which are still included in the newly released Altcoins.
Indeed, the three Altcoins POLYGON'S MATIC or Solana are both good in my opinion and both have the potential to become the best altcoins. but I'm more inclined to only Matic.

[Tigerheart3026]

solana and polygon both have a lot of real use cases. although i select polygon, because it’s super fast transaction speed it’s big advantages and lower cost fee in Etherum network and it’s multi chain supported blockchain. comparatively polygon is scalability than solana, and it’s high potential for the future.

[zasad@]

I prefer optimism (L2 solution)
Transactions there are instant, the commission is 0.5 dollars and uniswap is already working on optimism
If you want you can test
https://help.uniswap.org/en/articles/5404230-how-to-connect-to-optimism
your wallet should be switched to network optimism
https://info.uniswap.org/#/optimism/

[indo1]

From what I researched, it seems that Solana is superior, because Solana is more worthy of being paired with BNB, and it looks like Solana stands longer than MATIC, I have also followed the development of both in the DeFi concept, and Solona has many successful projects, with many communities.

[MoneyJ]

My preference would be MATIC over Solana simply because of experience and fast. Matic ecosystem is already rolling out cool DeFi and decentralized applications . It is way cheaper than Eth and it is a layer 2 scaling implementation on top of ETH.

[CryptoWarriorsssss]

My preference would be MATIC over Solana simply because of experience and fast. Matic ecosystem is already rolling out cool DeFi and decentralized applications. It is way cheaper than Eth and it is a layer 2 scaling implementation on top of ETH.

well,

Matic and AVAX ,both are on fire 🚀

[SyndicateLabs]

Instead of having so many options that you have to think about it, buy them all and keep it. MATIC and Solana are both names that have created a lot of buzz in recent times in the market. I see dapps moving to these platforms, and I also believe they are products that effectively solve the current problems in the market.

[cryptoknows]

If we consider these projects in terms of investment, then I think it is better to choose the Solana ecosystem. But if you are interested in cross-chain platforms then check out Near Protocol. This project has a blockchain that is much more technological than these two projects you have cited as an example. Due to the lower capitalization and popularization in crypto masses, Near ecosystem can be entered not only as an investor of token, DeFi or NFT within the ecosystem, but also as a developer. Huge opportunities have been created for novice developers, which undoubtedly has a beneficial effect on the development of the ecosystem.

[Jackl87]

POLYGON’S MATIC or Solana

No Doubt， Both are smart contract platforms that support several  DeFi and NFT protocols.
what is your options or opinions?

As you already said, both are great platforms in my opinion and both are definitely absolutely top projects in the crypto space, but i am usually a guy that buys and holds for at least a year so my focus is on long term projects and with that in mind i would choose solana if i had too between the two options that you gave. The reason for that is simple. Polygon is "just" a layer 2 solution for ethereum and with that they had a huge success in the last few months because of the high transaction fees that we were seeing a lot of times on the ethereum network and even now with realtively low gas fees we still have to pay 15$ for a trade on uniswap which is just way to much.
As long as this continues, polygon will continue to thrive but as soon as Ethereum 2.0 hits and is working i think there is not much demand anymore for projects like polygon.