|
Title: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 05:56:09 AM This is a discussion thread pertaining to Buy-A-Hash(.com)/HASH seeking an IPO on Havelock.
This OP will show the posts that Benjamin/Ben/Benny/Benny1985 Schlichter scrubbed from his self-moderated thread oppose to addressing the issues since he's seeking over a million dollars in funding from the Bitcoin community to start up his Litecoin mining operation in Circleville, Ohio. Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins? Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins? Not that I am aware of. You're kidding, right? Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring any bells? Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Yes, Benny and I are shill accounts for the winklevoss twins. I'm going to try this one more time, but this time pretend you're in church and are on your good behavior. Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring a bell, as in born 5 minutes apart... in September? Or, will you go for the hat trick and avoid the question some other way? Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Yes, Benny and I are shill accounts for the winklevoss twins. I'm going to try this one more time, but this time pretend you're in church and are on your good behavior. Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring a bell, as in born 5 minutes apart... in September? Or, will you go for the hat trick and avoid the question some other way? Yes, we're born 5 minutes apart. I have no clue how you found that out, but at any rate it's correct. Seriously, he had no clue how I found out? Ever heard of Google? http://www.christianguitar.org/rreview/66549 What I, and I'm sure others, are now perplexed about is why you opted to not answer the question the first time, the second time at the very most opposed to beating around the bush? You and your brother being twins should not be a concern, but avoiding the issue makes you look like your hiding something. Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins? Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins? Not that I am aware of. Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins? Not that I am aware of. You're kidding, right? Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring any bells? Yes, Benny and I are shill accounts for the winklevoss twins. Yes, Benny and I are shill accounts for the winklevoss twins. I'm going to try this one more time, but this time pretend you're in church and are on your good behavior. Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring a bell, as in born 5 minutes apart... in September? Or, will you go for the hat trick and avoid the question some other way? Yes, Benny and I are shill accounts for the winklevoss twins. I'm going to try this one more time, but this time pretend you're in church and are on your good behavior. Does 2:11 and 2:16 ring a bell, as in born 5 minutes apart... in September? Or, will you go for the hat trick and avoid the question some other way? Yes, we're born 5 minutes apart. I have no clue how you found that out, but at any rate it's correct. Here's a freebie: This is the way the exchange should've gone: "Hey, Benny. Do you and Brandon have anything in common with the Winklevoss twins?" "Yes. Brandon and I are twins born five minutes apart. I look forward to addressing any other questions or concerns you may have." Nipped in the bud, oppose to locking your previous thread to start all over again with a self-moderated on, calling naysayers shills, and avoiding mundane questions. Pretend YOU are the one outside looking in. Would you invest in this outfit upon seeing the above? FYI, if you think the above is cause for alarm, wait till you see my next post. It'll bring 68,000 tears to your eyes. PS: I envision RENT tanking by morning. Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote I want to know how acknowledging time of birth is pertient to running a business. We've already answered more questions than any single issuer on any thread. We've had more personal information posted on this forum than Neobee/bitfunder/ect yet have had no investor complaints or concerns about our busines practices. Only outside individuals who are digging up dirt. Acknowledging time of birth or having a twin is not pertinent to running a business. And, I'm glad to hear that done of your investors had any concerns to date about your business practices. But, you are now seeking public funding via Havelock, thus more of what your business model consists of should and will be scrutinized thanks to the likes of Danny Brewster. If you're business model is of the up-and-up, then there's not a single thing that anybody like the likes of myself can bring to the table to thwart your IPO plans, but your tone and the way you've been presenting yourself the last couple days surely causes red flags to wave. I'm sure you know what I meant when I espoused bringing 68,000 tears to one's eyes, didn't you? I'm pretty certain that's one aspect you rather not have exposed prior to your IPO. The last one was penned in between the above exchanges, but opted to post it last below the fold: Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Since the thread is locked... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703956.msg7984907#msg7984907 Quote Ben owns a couple of rentals, outside of that he really isn't involved in real estate. Art is a 3rd cousin of ours, we have never met him and he does not, nor has ever lived in Circleville (He's from Washington Court House). I was kind of the one that introduced Ben to Bitcoin, he then in turn introduced me to the funding side of things. To be clear, it was Brandon Schlichter a.k.a. Branny on this forum, Benjamin/Ben/Benny Schlichter's older brother (how much older has yet to be disclosed by said parties at this penning, albeit I have a clue). Brandon introduced Benny to Bitcoin, and Benny introduced Brandon to how to get funding, so that we are clear at this point. I just sent over the shareholder list to Havelock for migration. I also sent an email out to everyone. You will need to use the SAME bitfunder email address to sign up to havelock. If this needs changed please email me ASAP. I am also missing emails for two IDs. 250 1CGPxUjd82XNwMk1pJPimzumbxdkneKfZz 822 1CyEbtvE1hTCkayPN6BX6gn7jqhfab8GUT In the post above, Brandon/Branny discloses that tRental Starter has secured IPO on Havelock. Following me so far? It's not rocket science! Yet... Bet you'll knew there was a yet coming, especially the Yetis among us. Yet, on April 17, 2014 (ironically, my dad's birthday, albeit '38), Benny, the one who got his older brother, Brandon, into the funding aspect of Bitcoin is, he himself, seeking out his funding options: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5563/14552628357_acb858afb2_c.jpg http://s21.postimg.org/m27iyn0c7/Havelock_2.png Clearly, in the exchanges above, Benny was made aware of Havelock (which Brandon was already using) while on the hunt for funding options, of which his brother, Brandon, was already successfully using Havelock, hence no need to hunt further. BTW, this is the first time on log.bitcoin-assets.com that Benny's name was attached to the moniker Mystickman, and at no time on said site has Benny even mentioned having a brother named Brandon that's a Bitcoiner and has been using Havelock since January of this year. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 05:57:30 AM I'm sure more posts will be deleted, so when they are I will add them to this post.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 05:58:47 AM I'm now in the process of penning a post that'll bring 68,000 tears to Benny, Brandon and their current investor's eyes.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 06:08:26 AM Seriously!? Your exercising your self-moderated options? Boys, you both just messed up big time! Yes, because at this point, I am concerned for my families' safety in regards to what you're posting. You, IPO Magic, and NotLambChop have exhibited the same patternistic behavior in regards to undermine my company and my shareholders. Given that you have spent a significant amount of time uncovering nothing in the way of negative behavior (sans inventions by your own mind about failure to disclose the time of our birth), I am convinced your aim is unfathomably malevolent. I have no guarantees your next post will not be pictures of my wife or child, or Branny's wife or child. This is why I chose to self-moderate. Time will easily tell how right you are about anything you've posted. You're free to start your own thread and uncover whatever information you would like about myself or my (twin) brother. Since you want to know so much about me, I will go ahead and disclose all that I can in one convenient posting: I am 28 years old. My wife's name is Tara I have one child You likely know this from Facebook, or wherever you can pull data from. What you will not find is a criminal record, as I have (yet) to get a parking ticket. What college education I have was from ministerial training to become a pastor, before I co-founded a research firm a few years ago. If you really felt I was hiding something, you're more than free to come to Circleville, Ohio to meet myself and Branny, in person. We will gladly buy you lunch. Or you can meet me when I attend Cryptolina in a few weeks. Your choice. Dude, you're off by a mile. I'm in Sandwich, IL, and not affiliated with anybody. Also, I have no intentions of posting anything to bring harm to you or your family, let alone pics. Everything I intend on posting will only negate what you've stated in the past, plus any other nuggets related to your business plan I may yet uncover. Claiming that you are now fearful of me hence deleting posts just adds more scrutiny to your endeavor. I see Bitcointalk's twins wasted no time getting their votes in on my poll. Hope they have the tissues ready by the time I pen the post that'll bring 68,000 tears to their eyes. The last one holding RENT shares on Havelock by morning (CST) is a rotten egg. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 06:20:15 AM Hello, I noticed that there are a lot of people getting onto the LTC bandwagon. It seems that 7950s and 7970s are arguably the best for LTC mining (from my understanding). I have a few 7950s on the way, so I was curious what some good settings were to shoot for. Most 7950 owners are reporting between 550 - 620 khash once some optimization is done. If anyone has good settings, let us know! If I can save a few hours on a setup for 5 7950s, I'll gladly throw some coin to someone that can give me a batch script, or at least point me in the right direction for settings. Thanks! https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg21780#msg21780 Quote Proving it is rather easy at this point. I could easily point you to the Secretary of State's website with my LLC's name on it. Hashing power is even easier, as I can simply throw out our pool's API key that can verify that I am hashing at the moment - which as of currently, I am a top-10 hasher at a major LTC pool. Amazing how somebody could go from waiting for his first major batch of miners to arrive to being in the top 10 spot on a pool all within a month's time. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 08:06:06 AM The long awaited, epic 68,000 tears post you'll been waiting for, with apologies for the delay, albeit it wasn't a Fortnight™.
Whats the status of the 0.04c/kwh and 68k sq ft building? How does a successful IPO affect the timetable or progress of this lease? What happens to the old HVAC and electric equipment after you move the operation? Last time you built a mining facility the construction seemed to take couple weeks too long cutting into profits. Will this time be better? 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. 2. It would help ensure that we can close the deal if any additional capital was/is needed for facility acquisition. As-is, the building is usable for retail/distribution, but not for larger scale mining. The facility is equipped with, at a minimum, 800a/208v service, but we need to continue investigation of the current capacity to see what maximum deployment is when we move in. 3. We will likely cut out the current HVAC equipment to be moved to the new facility. Furthermore, the facility is already equipped with a large number of air handlers/compressors. It was a former hardware sale company (think Lowes, but a mom & pop building). Regrettably, we could have purchased dozens of HVAC units at a fraction of retail when they liquidated the assets of the company. But there is still a reasonable amount of hardware available for utilization upon move-in. 4. We continued to pay out dividends regardless of where the facility was. Since our pivot involves a more retail-centric offering, we can put money into hardware resales, while ensuring that the HVAC/electric is done in a proper way. Once that is done, we'll leverage liquid capital from hardware sales to move into mining. Even then, I believe that we can broker a deal with companies like ZeusMiner that are willing to sell (or even give) you hardware if you're willing to split coin generation with them. This could be a scenario where the investor pays only for HVAC/electric installation, while we leverage said deal and merely pay for electricity - offsetting any hardware costs that the investor could occur while waiting (and losing) potential mining profits. Astute readers are already aware of where I came up with my 68,000 [tears] figure. They all earned a star. For all other, well... what can I say but sorry. Note the date of the above post: July 24, 2014, 04:14:11 PM Before I go any further, let's all bow our heads and pray: Heavenly Father, Jehovah, please forgive me for what I'm about to disclose about our brethren. Amen, Hallelujah, and all that jazz. April 25, 2014: http://www.corecompute.com/bitcoin/bitcoin_20140425.html http://s23.postimg.org/dz0ci4zl7/IRC_Buy_A_Hash_Dialog.png Note the important part: Quote mrstickball btiefert: my company is in negotiation to purchase a very large warehouse for hashing / eCommerce sales for miners mrstickball its too large for what we need... its 68,000 square foot Boy, what I would give to see the first of those 68,000 tears a fallin'. Then again, Benny may be a tad slow, for earlier he conveniently forgot that he had a twin bother. Noticed I highlighted the 'is in negotiation' clause. You're probably wondering why I would do such. Without any further ado,... https://www.havelockinvestments.com/reportdownload.php?id=107 Quote Location: All of the IPO proceeds raise by BTCI shall be used for further investment into BuyAHash. BuyAHash states that a portion of IPO proceeds will go towards the lease of a large, 68,000 square foot facility which has been made available to the market. Under full ownership, BuyAHash seeks to utilize the facility for warehousing of our goods as well as hosting of their computer systems. This property is currently available for lease requiring approximately 100,000 USD for deposit and leasing funds. As per our last inspection, the property needs little modification to be utilized for our purposes. Additionally, we note that the target facility has access to industrial-grade electricity at a rate of $0.04 per KWh which is extremely competitive for a large scale hashing facility. Quote Physical Infrastructure – BuyAHash has located a building with 68,000 sq. ft of warehousing/industrial space for sale. We would like to lease this building, as it has the electrical infrastructure to handle significantly more hashing capacity than we currently have. Additionally, the additional space can be used to maintain a better distribution channel for products, due to the facility having loading docks for commercial trucks. Meet Benny's new Buy-A-Hash facility: http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 Conveniently located on Dry Run Creek sans a paddle: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=2150+N+Court+St,+Circleville,+OH&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&es_sm=122&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=_gDSU_-uAYi1yASrjIKwAg&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ http://s27.postimg.org/51mp3kgb7/2150_N_Court_St.png http://s18.postimg.org/bmp1nnmjt/Auction.png Quote Reserve public auction for commercial property. The auction will be held on Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON. Preview will be by appointment only and the day of the auction starting at 11:00am This property has a contiguous 68,000 square feet with docks, overhead doors, retail space, storage area, sliding outside doors and paved parking. Full utilities, security system store front area with the opportunity to The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Lot Size: 3.77 acres and approximately 68,000 squarefeet of commercial retail and warehouse facility. Annual Taxes: 15,018.05 http://www.innovativerevenuesolutions.net/cgi-bin/mnarcview.cgi?irsauction/20140612 Note the date of the auction: Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON 30 days later would fall on July, 12, 2014, when the building WOULD have be closed on. Yet, 12 days after that date (yesterday), Benny stated... Quote 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. Surely, there has to be a misunderstanding on my part, and I'm sure Benny will be on this non-self-moderated thread to set the record straight because if he doesn't, his Buy-A-Hash WON'T IPO, and RENT will kick the bucket within 24 hours, because clearly these guys are not being up-and-up with their current and future investors, in spite of them claiming to be good Christians. I wonder if the following two auctioneers located in or around Circleville, OH, know each other: Dan Schlichter (also a real estate agent) and John D. Rogers. Quote The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Since Benny said he won the auction, that means he had to put down a minimum of 10% of $318,000 + $31,800, or $34,980 if he was the sole and winning bidder, otherwise his outlay is higher. https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg21789#msg21789 Quote My town is "Run down" in the fact there aren't a lot of jobs and a lot of commercial spaces for rent, thus why I can get everything cheaply. Translated: I have stacks of applications from businesses ready to least my unwanted/unneeded space of http://www.articlesweb.org/blog/wp-content/gallery/kleenex-marquee-tissues-are-reliable-for-use/kleenex-marquee-tissues-5.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 08:31:37 AM Bottom line, Benny has stated that he has won via auction, purchased, will purchase, closed, will close upon contacting investors, and lease/leasing/leased the same 68,000 sq ft facility.
I'm willing to bet Benny and Brandon Schlichter, kin of Art Schlichter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Schlichter), are not going to have a very pleasant Friday. Quote You're doing it wrong! ~Danny Brewster Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 08:41:10 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703956.msg7986896#msg7986896
https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5573/14760030773_6d74463e12_b.jpg I've had 7 of the dozen or so people who've thanked me for doing this research quote/reference the above. I wonder why. ::) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 08:55:26 AM https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg195791#msg195791
Quote For the record, Carnth - I have been doxxed by Swan66/NotLambChop/IPOMagic/Glen Gamow on Bitcointalk. They are posting private details about my life, digging up significant amounts of information in an attempt to discredit myself and my company. I have done nothing to warrant this (sans attempting to run a company). You can easily read the 104 pages prior to Swan's arrival and see no malicious activity by any user, nor myself. I am starting to fear for my family's well being, simply because I am trying to run a crypto company. I am unsure how to handle this kind of thing, because I am certain they are (all) hiding behind proxies, and have no aim for rational discourse. I've offered to meet these people in real life to discuss any issues with the company. At this juncture, I am befuddled by what I should do. I've already had to self-moderate my companies' thread on Bitcointalk, because the same kind of incredible behavior is going on there. Jesus Motherfuckin' Christ, not one fuckin' soul is even thinkin' about threatening you or your family. I, myself, have stuck it up heavily bitcoiner's asses and haven't once received a threatening phone call. The following is my true vitals: Bruno Kucinskas 406 W. Center St Sandwich, IL 60548 815-508-1668 I've once even scanned my current IL DL sans masking the ID # and posted it on this very forum, and it even included my SSN. Now, quit crying like a fuckin' baby! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 09:12:29 AM This is puzzling: http://buyahash.com/home-v4-small-slider/
http://s8.postimg.org/rjuhj2fbp/image.png Based in Ohio under the auspices of some Hong Kong thingie and UK‘s #1 website for ASIC Mining Hardware seeking IPO from a Panama Fund thingie that a James Grant from Canada may or may not be associated with, and special thanks to Danny Brewster formally from Cyprus, I, from Sandwich, not UK but IL, do the due diligence that everybody else hasn't taken the time to conduct. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Branny on July 25, 2014, 12:43:59 PM I guess if it REALLY mattered to BAH investors he could post a copy of the sales contract.
Hint Hint - It's not a 30 day contract :) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 25, 2014, 01:40:24 PM I guess if it REALLY mattered to BAH investors he could post a copy of the sales contract. Hint Hint - It's not a 30 day contract :) You know what else might "REALLY matter to BAH investors"? The fact that they aren't BAH investors :) http://s30.postimg.org/akn4i5u41/Capture.jpg Do you think Gleb has gotten to the point of harassment and you could get some LEO involved? I wouldn't want LEO but when you go after someone's family and someone's money... Ah, the "they threatened mah family!" gambit! Last used by the other totally honest businessman and HASH exchangemate, Danny Brewster of Neo Bee. If the threat is genuine, it would be downright irresponsible not to involve LEO. Of course, a few other interesting things will come to light, like fraudulent Sec filings: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml http://s30.postimg.org/akn4i5u41/Capture.jpg https://www.litecoininvest.com/security/BAH-C.PT/details So I'm pretty confident no LEO will be involved :) Silly children. This thread alone contains "over a hundred pages" of undeniable evidence, more than enough for any TLA to own the brothers SCHLICHTER. TL;DR: You dun goofed. Just keep punching, Joe! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: R_Lem on July 25, 2014, 03:29:21 PM Just keep punching, Joe! But I thought his name was Bruno? ...or Gleb or Phinnaeus. This Phinnaeus (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=667460.0) who tried to scam $2800 and has yet to explain himself. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: IPO Magic on July 25, 2014, 03:56:15 PM Joe=Joe Luis, a boxer. "Just keep punching, Joe" was purportedly advice given to him during a losing fight.
The blushing naivete of this whole operation is absolutely endearing! I mean, that Lightcointalk thread! What's the criminal counterpart to Keystone Cops? Whatever it is, the flimflam bros are it. Like bank robbers planning their heist on an interwebs forum, these geniuses do all the legwork for whatever TLA (state/federal) chooses to own them! Proof of intent? Benny would you mind posting a roadmap for the future of what's going to happen with these stark changes? I'm specifically curious about dividends and where our new exchange will be. Sorry to bother you with this on top of everything you're already running. -NapKing Sure thing, roadmap is as follows: 1. Creation of a Hong Kong private company, with an appointed trustee based in China/HK to comply with their laws 2. Sell current LLC to HK company 3. Re-List BAH on available exchange under new HK-based corporation. 4. Create IPO / Transfer user names / wallets / shares to new company listing 5. Proceed with running/managing the company ... Allright! http://s28.postimg.org/gdldn9dd9/hi5horse1.gif Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 25, 2014, 04:06:48 PM Jesus Motherfuckin' Christ, not one fuckin' soul is even thinkin' about threatening you or your family. I, myself, have stuck it up heavily bitcoiner's asses and haven't once received a threatening phone call. The following is my true vitals: Bruno Kucinskas 406 W. Center St Sandwich, IL 60548 815-508-1668 I've once even scanned my current IL DL sans masking the ID # and posted it on this very forum, and it even included my SSN. Now, quit crying like a fuckin' baby! So Gleb is Phinneus Gage's shill account or Gleb is just stealing Phin's info? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=278780.0;wap2 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 04:22:09 PM I guess if it REALLY mattered to BAH investors he could post a copy of the sales contract. Hint Hint - It's not a 30 day contract :) You know what else might "REALLY matter to BAH investors"? The fact that they aren't BAH investors :) http://s30.postimg.org/akn4i5u41/Capture.jpg Do you think Gleb has gotten to the point of harassment and you could get some LEO involved? I wouldn't want LEO but when you go after someone's family and someone's money... Ah, the "they threatened mah family!" gambit! Last used by the other totally honest businessman and HASH exchangemate, Danny Brewster of Neo Bee. If the threat is genuine, it would be downright irresponsible not to involve LEO. Of course, a few other interesting things will come to light, like fraudulent Sec filings: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1598311/000159831114000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml http://s30.postimg.org/akn4i5u41/Capture.jpg https://www.litecoininvest.com/security/BAH-C.PT/details So I'm pretty confident no LEO will be involved :) Silly children. This thread alone contains "over a hundred pages" of undeniable evidence, more than enough for any TLA to own the brothers SCHLICHTER. TL;DR: You dun goofed. Just keep punching, Joe! I'm willing to bet that Brothers Schlick are expoloring their LEO options with their local Barney Fife and Matlock (hmmm, that was serendipitous, noting the syllable lock). Hell, it wouldn't surprise me one bit if by happenstance they have an uncle in Florida who's a PO. ;) If by chance papers need to be served, I've already provided my full name, address, and phone number, unlike Brothers Schlick who opted to list their entities under their 60+ year old mama's address, the very person they feel in their warped minds is now fearful for her life due to the internet Svengoolies, probably going as far as purchasing candles from her local candle shop, circling them around her home and setting them aflame to keep us goolies at bay. Meanwhile, Brothers Schlick will do everything possible to spin the 2150 N Court St., Circleville, OH, allegations so that they can still IPO come Monday. Unfortunately, I don't see them playing their cards right on this issue, for they've already fucked up big-time when Schlick the Younger locked HASH's thread to start a self-moderated one, then dared me to start my own, ergo this thread. Art Schlichter: Distant third cousin boys, while I'm in the slammer serving my 20 years, promise me you'll continue with your ministry, always be truthful, and stay away from gambling. Brother Schlicks: We promise! http://ezinearticles.com/?How-to-Play-Texas-Hold-Em-Well&id=3262739 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 04:23:47 PM Jesus Motherfuckin' Christ, not one fuckin' soul is even thinkin' about threatening you or your family. I, myself, have stuck it up heavily bitcoiner's asses and haven't once received a threatening phone call. The following is my true vitals: Bruno Kucinskas 406 W. Center St Sandwich, IL 60548 815-508-1668 I've once even scanned my current IL DL sans masking the ID # and posted it on this very forum, and it even included my SSN. Now, quit crying like a fuckin' baby! So Gleb is Phinneus Gage's shill account or Gleb is just stealing Phin's info? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=278780.0;wap2 How can it be a shill account if it's declared? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 04:37:09 PM Just keep punching, Joe! But I thought his name was Bruno? ...or Gleb or Phinnaeus. This Phinnaeus (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=667460.0) who tried to scam $2800 and has yet to explain himself. Other bear that overslept their hibernation: http://s1.postimg.org/ismo42mxr/bear_outta_hibernation.png Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 05:26:05 PM I want to know how acknowledging time of birth is pertient to running a business. We've already answered more questions than any single issuer on any thread. We've had more personal information posted on this forum than Neobee/bitfunder/ect yet have had no investor complaints or concerns about our busines practices. Only outside individuals who are digging up dirt. But, when harder questions are put forth, it's time to buzz LEO Fife. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 07:41:27 PM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703956.msg7986896#msg7986896
Quote Benny owns 0 shares in RentalStarter. I'm more than happy to prove to our proposed board of advisors of this. Additionally I do not own shares in his company. Ergo, two completely different entities sans any crossover, unless... Branny, is annual indexation of the rent to the official CPI also a regular practice in the US? Or do you have a lower / higher freedom in adjusting to the local rental market? P.S. avoiding 'slum' is a very sane practice, imho If our properties get government subsidy , they are CPI indexed. Otherwise if not, we are allowed to raise/lower rent based on market rates. There is no rent protection/caps in my market (They exist in the US, but not here). Branny, is annual indexation of the rent to the official CPI also a regular practice in the US? Or do you have a lower / higher freedom in adjusting to the local rental market? P.S. avoiding 'slum' is a very sane practice, imho I've never seen annual indexing to anything in any of my rental agreements. It is all based on the market. I've seen CPI indexation , no regular rental increases and yearly increases of 1%-3% as part of the contract. All depends on the landlord. Yeah but if BTC/USD increases, it decreases the value of our investment....? Rentalstarter is tied to USD, if the BTC:USD rate increases, the value of bitcoins goes down. If bitcoins devalue then the rate increases significantly. My goal was to develop this into a BTC:USD hedge if people are bearish on bitcoin. News : We are currently negotiating/working on property #2. If it lands as I think it will , we will close Monday on the second property, rehab will take a little less than a week. We already have a tenant that is qualified for this property which will produce on the September dividend. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703956.msg7984957#msg7984957 Quote I have never met Art Schlichter in my life. We share an unfortunate last name, and a very vague relationship (3rd cousin, I believe). As for the rest of your post(s), I am unsure what it has to do with me. I own one apartment - the one I live in with my wife and child. The vast majority of your post involves my brother. I am not involved in RentalStarter in any capacity. Otherwise, feel free to dig up whatever you like on me. I am glad to answer whatever questions you have of me. Note to self: At 54, it's probably time to get a pair of glasses, for you're seeing things. But, you better do it prior to Benny penning his explanation to how he won via auction, purchased, will purchase, closed, will close upon contacting investors, and lease/leasing/leased the same 68,000 sq ft facility, located at 2150 N Court St., Circleville, OH, and probable be dubbed Circleopolis, the Litecoin Capital of the World. You don't want to make the same mistake of seeing something that's not there like you did above thinking you saw Benny having a vested interest in Rental Starter when clearly he stated that he doesn't. That would be a My Bad on so many levels. BTW, Brothers Schlick, please don't pull-a-Brewster (leaving his daughter in Cyprus) and leave mama alone to fend off the wolves when you up-and-leave Circleville, OH, after you finally amass enough precious in your coffer. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 07:51:51 PM https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5557/14720878726_4e43430ce4_b.jpg
That's weird! Either Brothers Schlick have more sockpuppets than they claim are attacking them, or there truly are idiots in the Bitcoin space having more money than brains, investing in shady enterprises even after evidence is put forth in front of them to be aware by an individual (me) who has done more due diligence than most everybody else combined. Madness! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 25, 2014, 07:56:57 PM Sorry, I forgot to vote.
You should take a new screenshot. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM Sorry, I forgot to vote. You should take a new screenshot. A wise man once said: Quote A lobotomized circus chimpanzee could have flung it's poo at a poster board and made better choices than what you made. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: IPO Magic on July 25, 2014, 08:34:20 PM Sorry, I forgot to vote. You should take a new screenshot. Lol, I didn't. I simply did not vote. Not once, not once per account (accounts take ~1 min to set up by hand). Because these polls measure nothing beyond people's willingness to rig them. But if you'd like me to vote, I will. Just tell me how many times. <==make it a reasonable number and I'll do it manually, no script. @Gleb Gamow: Benny and Branny are internet marketers. Marketing is what they do, with history all the way back into their teens. When other kids were getting laid, these two were already pitching and soliciting loans for their "paintball-cum-Christianity" biz. I'm sure they have as many sock accounts as they need. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 25, 2014, 09:04:59 PM Sorry, I forgot to vote. You should take a new screenshot. Lol, I didn't. I simply did not vote. Not once, not once per account (accounts take ~1 min to set up by hand). Because these polls measure nothing beyond people's willingness to rig them. But if you'd like me to vote, I will. Just tell me how many times. <==make it a reasonable number and I'll do it manually, no script. @Gleb Gamow: Benny and Branny are internet marketers. Marketing is what they do, with history all the way back into their teens. When other kids were getting laid, these two were already pitching and soliciting loans for their "paintball-cum-Christianity" biz. I'm sure they have as many sock accounts as they need. http://lowres.cartoonstock.com/computers-seo-search_engine-walking_on_water-rowing-traffic-tcrn230_low.jpg Ask the guy with one oar in the water paddling around in circles[ville]. I'll only request one honest vote and won't dictate how you should vote. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 25, 2014, 10:19:39 PM So... you guys watch a lot of Glenn Beck then?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: bomberos on July 25, 2014, 10:39:30 PM im curious why with all the other securities being listed here, this one draws so much attention from those who seem not to care for it for one reason or another. surely the fervor of your disapproval seems heightened as compared to other arguably more questionable threads
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 25, 2014, 11:08:56 PM im curious why with all the other securities being listed here, this one draws so much attention from those who seem not to care for it for one reason or another. surely the fervor of your disapproval seems heightened as compared to other arguably more questionable threads Yeah, I don't get what motivates people like this either. I guess trolls will be trolls. It's interesting how this person was warned and moderated out of our thread by the admins and then makes a new post where they can't be moderated... then posts a bunch of irrelevant and circumstantial items and posts a poll, only to admit that: 1) They have several shill accounts 2) The poll can be rigged by easily making more accounts like the one he is using that was made 3 days ago. Yet, he continues insisting that the offering is a shady enterprise even though 1) Their claims have been completely and repeatedly refuted 2) The business has been in good standing for over a year 3) Has filed paperwork with the SEC making it legal to offer securities. 4) Past/Current investors are very happy people that they got in when they did. The above is an excellent example of the classic straw-man argument. I really wonder why people like this bother wasting their time like this digging up information on Google and trying to make a case for "Gotcha! this is a scam!". I hope one day they realize that life has so much more to offer if you just use your time more constructively. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 12:11:03 AM ... It's interesting how this person was warned and moderated out of our thread by the admins and then makes a new post where they can't be moderated... then posts a bunch of irrelevant and circumstantial items and posts a poll, only to admit that: The "admins" in the SELF-moderated thread are Benny [and his alts]. Quote 1) They have several shill accounts Who are the shills shilling for? Quote 2) The poll can be rigged by easily making more accounts like the one he is using that was made 3 days ago. I, in the true spirit of Bitcointalk, have several accounts [Google "Lambchop," Columbo!] ...and yet the poll (if the screencap is legit, I didn't vote so I can't see the results) only has four negative votes. To Seven positive. But... rigged? :D Quote Yet, he continues insisting that the offering is a shady enterprise even though 1) Their claims have been completely and repeatedly refuted Hey, Leibniz, what number comes after 2? Is it 1 again? Quote 2) The business has been in good standing for over a year My sedimentary friend, every Ponzi scheme pays out for a while, every shell game needs winners to rope in the marks. That's how life works. If the "business" is great shape, why is it asking for more money? Several orders of magnitude more money than it has or has ever made? Quote 3) Has filed paperwork with the SEC making it legal to offer securities. It filed FRAUDULENT paperwork with the SEC. Benny has committed SECURITIES FRAUD, amongst other things. Reread this (much shorter than 100 pages) thread. Quote 4) Past/Current investors are very happy people that they got in when they did. According to Benny's SEC exemption filing, THERE ARE NO PAST OR CURRENT INVESTORS. You never happened, you don't exist :) But you do exist, and OF COURSE you want this ...thing to go up on an exchange. Pretty hard to http://www.fimfiction-static.net/images/story_images/175893.png?1395010399 ...but Boulder? I still love you <3 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 12:17:49 AM im curious why with all the other securities being listed here, this one draws so much attention from those who seem not to care for it for one reason or another. surely the fervor of your disapproval seems heightened as compared to other arguably more questionable threads Nah. I called out Active Mining and NEO BEE and... Are you new here? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 01:01:38 AM He trolls all the securities and pulls the same thing... eventually even the blind man gets a few bbs of the shotgun blast near the target. lol
Nothing new here... just his same business as usual and proving he has no life. :-P Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 01:31:30 AM This blind man is yet to be wrong. Gotta agree with you though, picking duds here is pretty easy, I mean, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666993.0
Funny how financial wizards like you can't spot a pattern developing :D But hang tight, bro! You'll get a chance to stock up on more of that wholesome goodness come Monday, lol. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 02:00:14 AM This blind man is yet to be wrong. Gotta agree with you though, picking duds here is pretty easy, I mean, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666993.0 Funny how financial wizards like you can't spot a pattern developing :D But hang tight, bro! You'll get a chance to stock up on more of that wholesome goodness come Monday, lol. Those who can't see patterns are not good at math and deserve to loose their money. Never fear, for Hash Funny by Brother Scklicks will soon pen an explanation to how Benny Schlichter (not Brandon) won via auction, purchased, will purchase, closed, will close upon contacting investors, AND lease/leasing/leased the same 68,000 sq ft facility, located at 2150 N Court St., Circleville, OH, and probable be dubbed Circleopolis, the Litecoin Capital of the World. For Hash Funny's investors, note the pattern: http://www.andreleitealves.net/images/twoliars.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 02:12:39 AM The only pattern I'm seeing is your FUD. Are you able to link me to something positive you have said about anything? I'm morbidly curious.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 02:42:14 AM The only pattern I'm seeing is your FUD. Are you able to link me to something positive you have said about anything? I'm morbidly curious. It's times like these that I wish I could take a break, strip naked, put some motion lotion on my stiff dick, and jack that motherfucker till I make a fountain, having it rain down on me in hopes of some of it hits my lips so I can taste my precious. But, unfortunately, I can't, for I need to spread more FUD for the morbidly curious. http://www.ebay.ph/itm/PCI-e-express-GPU-16X-16x-Riser-Extender-Card-Unpowered-USA-SELLER-/141338340809?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item20e86bedc9 https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3835/14559285689_24a85a8c83_b.jpg Item location: Circleville, Ohio, United States Top-rated seller boldar (472 ) 100% Positive feedback Boldar logged in directly after Benny1985 logged out after he deleted a post of mine on his self-moderated thread, penned to garner $1M+ worth of bitcoins through Havelock to start a Litecoin Pharm in Circleville, OH. And, I'm the one spreading FUD. FUCK YOU! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 02:45:49 AM ^
Loooll!!1! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 02:48:55 AM ^ Loooll!!1! The poll results may be behind as to where they should be, but stay tuned for the second half, for come Monday RENT is going to tank, and HASH will be only be a wet memory. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 02:53:18 AM Where are you shipping from? Are these from batch 1? Can anyone vouch for this guy? I can vouch for him. I've been doing business with Ben for well over a year and I also ordered over $10k of gridseeds from him a few months back when he was one of the first to get the bulk pricing on them in the US. Never a problem with any transactions. If you have enough BTC for 2 then order direct from Bitmain, but if you only want one and /or using a Credit Card, consider this offer. Do you go to the same church and set on top of one another while performing rhythm in the pews? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 03:04:52 AM I'll take that as a no... you seem to only have the capacity to spread negativity. And now more insults and expletives, oh my! Grain of Salt.
Exactly what are you implying? At risk of feeding the trolls, where is line of thinking going now and how is it remotely relevant to the subject at hand? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:10:21 AM I'll take that as a no... you seem to only have the capacity to spread negativity. And now more insults and expletives, oh my! Grain of Salt. Exactly what are you implying? At risk of feeding the trolls, where is line of thinking going now and how is it remotely relevant to the subject at hand? Jesus Motherfuckin' Christ, fatass! I'm implying that you are one, if not both, of Brothers Schlick. You're shipping your sold eBay items from Circleville, OHIO. Plus, you loggin in directly after Benny1985 loggout. Do I have to wipe your fuckin' ass for you too? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 03:18:26 AM [gong sound] Incorrect Sir! Again, since you have absolutely nothing of relevance to bring to your claims, you have resorted to... I'm not sure what you'd call this type of rant, really. But I can tell you that it's far from logic. :)
Have you considered seeking professional help for your condition? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 03:24:18 AM balder/branny/benny whoever you are, you're one slick d00d. I see a bright future for you, my "morbidly curious" friend!
http://ezgifarchive.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/freaks2.gif Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:41:03 AM balder/branny/benny whoever you are, you're one slick d00d. I see a bright future for you, my "morbidly curious" friend! http://ezgifarchive.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/freaks2.gif http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/27/nyregion/27buckley.2.cityroom.jpg "Close, but you're getting warm." Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:44:41 AM The following post is what Benjamin Schlichter is avoiding at all cost:
The long awaited, epic 68,000 tears post you'll been waiting for, with apologies for the delay, albeit it wasn't a Fortnight™. Whats the status of the 0.04c/kwh and 68k sq ft building? How does a successful IPO affect the timetable or progress of this lease? What happens to the old HVAC and electric equipment after you move the operation? Last time you built a mining facility the construction seemed to take couple weeks too long cutting into profits. Will this time be better? 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. 2. It would help ensure that we can close the deal if any additional capital was/is needed for facility acquisition. As-is, the building is usable for retail/distribution, but not for larger scale mining. The facility is equipped with, at a minimum, 800a/208v service, but we need to continue investigation of the current capacity to see what maximum deployment is when we move in. 3. We will likely cut out the current HVAC equipment to be moved to the new facility. Furthermore, the facility is already equipped with a large number of air handlers/compressors. It was a former hardware sale company (think Lowes, but a mom & pop building). Regrettably, we could have purchased dozens of HVAC units at a fraction of retail when they liquidated the assets of the company. But there is still a reasonable amount of hardware available for utilization upon move-in. 4. We continued to pay out dividends regardless of where the facility was. Since our pivot involves a more retail-centric offering, we can put money into hardware resales, while ensuring that the HVAC/electric is done in a proper way. Once that is done, we'll leverage liquid capital from hardware sales to move into mining. Even then, I believe that we can broker a deal with companies like ZeusMiner that are willing to sell (or even give) you hardware if you're willing to split coin generation with them. This could be a scenario where the investor pays only for HVAC/electric installation, while we leverage said deal and merely pay for electricity - offsetting any hardware costs that the investor could occur while waiting (and losing) potential mining profits. Astute readers are already aware of where I came up with my 68,000 [tears] figure. They all earned a star. For all other, well... what can I say but sorry. Note the date of the above post: July 24, 2014, 04:14:11 PM Before I go any further, let's all bow our heads and pray: Heavenly Father, Jehovah, please forgive me for what I'm about to disclose about our brethren. Amen, Hallelujah, and all that jazz. April 25, 2014: http://www.corecompute.com/bitcoin/bitcoin_20140425.html http://s23.postimg.org/dz0ci4zl7/IRC_Buy_A_Hash_Dialog.png Note the important part: Quote mrstickball btiefert: my company is in negotiation to purchase a very large warehouse for hashing / eCommerce sales for miners mrstickball its too large for what we need... its 68,000 square foot Boy, what I would give to see the first of those 68,000 tears a fallin'. Then again, Benny may be a tad slow, for earlier he conveniently forgot that he had a twin bother. Noticed I highlighted the 'is in negotiation' clause. You're probably wondering why I would do such. Without any further ado,... https://www.havelockinvestments.com/reportdownload.php?id=107 Quote Location: All of the IPO proceeds raise by BTCI shall be used for further investment into BuyAHash. BuyAHash states that a portion of IPO proceeds will go towards the lease of a large, 68,000 square foot facility which has been made available to the market. Under full ownership, BuyAHash seeks to utilize the facility for warehousing of our goods as well as hosting of their computer systems. This property is currently available for lease requiring approximately 100,000 USD for deposit and leasing funds. As per our last inspection, the property needs little modification to be utilized for our purposes. Additionally, we note that the target facility has access to industrial-grade electricity at a rate of $0.04 per KWh which is extremely competitive for a large scale hashing facility. Quote Physical Infrastructure – BuyAHash has located a building with 68,000 sq. ft of warehousing/industrial space for sale. We would like to lease this building, as it has the electrical infrastructure to handle significantly more hashing capacity than we currently have. Additionally, the additional space can be used to maintain a better distribution channel for products, due to the facility having loading docks for commercial trucks. Meet Benny's new Buy-A-Hash facility: http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 Conveniently located on Dry Run Creek sans a paddle: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=2150+N+Court+St,+Circleville,+OH&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&es_sm=122&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=_gDSU_-uAYi1yASrjIKwAg&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ http://s27.postimg.org/51mp3kgb7/2150_N_Court_St.png http://s18.postimg.org/bmp1nnmjt/Auction.png Quote Reserve public auction for commercial property. The auction will be held on Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON. Preview will be by appointment only and the day of the auction starting at 11:00am This property has a contiguous 68,000 square feet with docks, overhead doors, retail space, storage area, sliding outside doors and paved parking. Full utilities, security system store front area with the opportunity to The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Lot Size: 3.77 acres and approximately 68,000 squarefeet of commercial retail and warehouse facility. Annual Taxes: 15,018.05 http://www.innovativerevenuesolutions.net/cgi-bin/mnarcview.cgi?irsauction/20140612 Note the date of the auction: Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON 30 days later would fall on July, 12, 2014, when the building WOULD have be closed on. Yet, 12 days after that date (yesterday), Benny stated... Quote 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. Surely, there has to be a misunderstanding on my part, and I'm sure Benny will be on this non-self-moderated thread to set the record straight because if he doesn't, his Buy-A-Hash WON'T IPO, and RENT will kick the bucket within 24 hours, because clearly these guys are not being up-and-up with their current and future investors, in spite of them claiming to be good Christians. I wonder if the following two auctioneers located in or around Circleville, OH, know each other: Dan Schlichter (also a real estate agent) and John D. Rogers. Quote The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Since Benny said he won the auction, that means he had to put down a minimum of 10% of $318,000 + $31,800, or $34,980 if he was the sole and winning bidder, otherwise his outlay is higher. https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg21789#msg21789 Quote My town is "Run down" in the fact there aren't a lot of jobs and a lot of commercial spaces for rent, thus why I can get everything cheaply. Translated: I have stacks of applications from businesses ready to least my unwanted/unneeded space of http://www.articlesweb.org/blog/wp-content/gallery/kleenex-marquee-tissues-are-reliable-for-use/kleenex-marquee-tissues-5.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:46:45 AM Quote If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. If all goes according to your plans, that'll be this coming Monday when you'll IPO sans deed in hand according to your timeline. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 26, 2014, 03:47:38 AM that's it?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:49:25 AM Quote Annual Taxes: $15,018.05 That equated to approximately $1,251.50/mo not counting insurance, which won't be cheap. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 26, 2014, 03:52:38 AM No, this is not your best work. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 03:54:30 AM No, this is not your best work. In spite of Benny Schlichter penning how he won via auction, purchased, will purchase, closed, will close upon contacting investors, and lease/leasing/leased the same 68,000 sq ft facility, located at 2150 N Court St., Circleville, OH, and probably be dubbed Circleopolis, the Litecoin Capital of the World. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 03:58:04 AM Very underwhelmed, you'll have to do better than that. But I know you can't. Nice "try" though, if you want to call it that.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 26, 2014, 04:05:54 AM No, this is not your best work. In spite of Benny Schlichter penning how he won via auction, purchased, will purchase, closed, will close upon contacting investors, and lease/leasing/leased the same 68,000 sq ft facility, located at 2150 N Court St., Circleville, OH, and probably be dubbed Circleopolis, the Litecoin Capital of the World. I am looking forward to getting my crony appointment as ambassador doom marshal of Circleopolis. I will have a jester, we will call him doge. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 04:26:01 AM Oh all things, that was the GOTCHA? LOL
Ben has explained the new facility in the documentation as well as on the forums... this is not any sort of negative... it's actually a huge plus for the company to get free rent and very cheap power to maximize dividends. You would have already known that if you would have bothered to read... gee wiz... Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 04:42:07 AM Oh all things, that was the GOTCHA? LOL Ben has explained the new facility in the documentation as well as on the forums... this is not any sort of negative... it's actually a huge plus for the company to get free rent and very cheap power to maximize dividends. You would have already known that if you would have bothered to read... gee wiz... Sir, I've read through it no less than 3 times, even quoted clauses several times, of which I'm done so again below. http://www.corecompute.com/bitcoin/bitcoin_20140425.html Quote mrstickball Anyone know of any Bitcoin businesses in Ohio? My company may be purchasing a huge complex, and want to create a facility that can house crypto startups btiefert What type of facility are you thinking about? An incubator? enolja Ohio is building a deathcamp for bitcoiners enolja "facility" mrstickball btiefert: my company is in negotiation to purchase a very large warehouse for hashing / eCommerce sales for miners mrstickball its too large for what we need... its 68,000 square foot mrstickball we need less than 1/2 of that mrstickball So my thought is to see if anyone would want a facility that they can grow their startup at, hopefully with less risk or worries since we'd work to handle what we could for legalities, ect mrstickball create a safe haven for BTC projects to the best of what we can helo sounds like an awkward partnership mrstickball it could be, or it could be very useful I'll make this really simple for your guys who rode the short bus to school. On April 25, 2014, Benny Schlichter a.k.a. mrstickball stated above that his company was in negotiations to purchase a 68,000 sq. ft. facility. That very same 68,000 sq. ft. facility was up for action on June 12, 2014, as seen here: http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 On July 21, 2014, Benny Schlichter released his business plan for BuyAHash: https://www.havelockinvestments.com/reportdownload.php?id=107 Within the above, you'll read... Quote In-House Mining – BuyAHash maintains a facility that has approximately 75 kW of capacity, and are seeking to expand this to well beyond the current capacity at a new facility Utilizing a larger facility in tandem with wholesale prices on exclusive mining equipment will allow us to rapidly achieve the significant profits due to the availability of 4c/KWh power in our region. Remember, the auction already ended and Benny Schlichter is on record in stating that closing is almost finalized in spite of such should have taken place prior to July 12, 2014. Quote Location: All of the IPO proceeds raise by BTCI shall be used for further investment into BuyAHash. BuyAHash states that a portion of IPO proceeds will go towards the lease of a large, 68,000 square foot facility which has been made available to the market. Under full ownership, BuyAHash seeks to utilize the facility for warehousing of our goods as well as hosting of their computer systems. This property is currently available for lease requiring approximately 100,000 USD for deposit and leasing funds. As per our last inspection, the property needs little modification to be utilized for our purposes. Additionally, we note that the target facility has access to industrial-grade electricity at a rate of $0.04 per KWh which is extremely competitive for a large scale hashing facility. This is a lie! It's not available for lease to Benny Schlichter because he owns it. Quote Physical Infrastructure – BuyAHash has located a building with 68,000 sq. ft of warehousing/industrial space for sale. We would like to lease this building, as it has the electrical infrastructure to handle significantly more hashing capacity than we currently have. Additionally, the additional space can be used to maintain a better distribution channel for products, due to the facility having loading docks for commercial trucks. Recall, once again, that the above was penned on ~July 21, 2014 (this past Monday), and the auction ended on June 12, 2014, of which Benny Schlichter was the winning bidder. Posted yesterday, July 24, 2014, the following is proof that Benny Schlichter did indeed win the auction for the 68,000 sq. ft. facility. Whats the status of the 0.04c/kwh and 68k sq ft building? How does a successful IPO affect the timetable or progress of this lease? What happens to the old HVAC and electric equipment after you move the operation? Last time you built a mining facility the construction seemed to take couple weeks too long cutting into profits. Will this time be better? 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. Can you not see the inconsistencies? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 04:48:15 AM Oh all things, that was the GOTCHA? LOL Ben has explained the new facility in the documentation as well as on the forums... this is not any sort of negative... it's actually a huge plus for the company to get free rent and very cheap power to maximize dividends. You would have already known that if you would have bothered to read... gee wiz... Nowhere in their Prospectus does it state that they already own the building. Please prove me wrong. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 26, 2014, 04:49:55 AM Can you not see the inconsistencies? It's called business. The first thing to change is always the plan. We keep telling you Benny is transparent with us. The only people who weren't aware of this are the ones who have chosen not to pay attention. I'm sorry that something has affected you so strongly that you focus on your vitriol when people are reaching out to you to help get answers to your questions. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 04:50:32 AM Quote my company is in negotiation to purchase a very large warehouse for hashing / eCommerce sales for miners It was a fuckin' auction, hence no formal negotiations come into play. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 04:53:46 AM Can you not see the inconsistencies? It's called business. The first thing to change is always the plan. We keep telling you Benny is transparent with us. The only people who weren't aware of this are the ones who have chosen not to pay attention. I'm sorry that something has affected you so strongly that you focus on your vitriol when people are reaching out to you to help get answers to your questions. Is part of the business plan to lie on the Prospectus? The building was already procured and had to be paid in full by July 21, 2014. Yet, in the Prospectus it's stating that they're planning on leasing the building, and yesterday Benny states that it had yet to close upon just winning the auction. Which the fuck is it? I got this great idea! I'll simply call Mr. Rogers, the auctioneer, tomorrow and find out exactly who did win the auction. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 26, 2014, 05:12:10 AM Granted, these are characteristics of narcissistic mothers from a random website on the internet
1. Everything she does is deniable 2. She violates your boundaries. 3. She favoritizes. 4. She undermines 5. She demeans, criticizes and denigrates. 6. She makes you look crazy. 7. She's envious. 8. She's a liar in too many ways to count. 9. She has to be the center of attention all the time. 10. She manipulates your emotions in order to feed on your pain. 11. She's selfish and willful. 12. She's self-absorbed. 13. She is insanely defensive and is extremely sensitive to any criticism 14. She terrorizes 15. She's infantile and petty. 16. She's aggressive and shameless. 17. She "parentifies." 18. She's exploitative 19. She projects 20. She is never wrong about anything. 21. She seems to have no awareness that other people even have feelings. 22. She blames. 23. She destroys your relationships. 24. As a last resort she goes pathetic. I'm not WebMD but I was going to highlight the ones where I thought you fit. I realized it would be easier to highlight the ones you didn't fit under, since there were so few. I decided that would look weird and just let folks decide for themselves. Gleb, are you actually a doting narcissistic mother? Plot twist! You're Benny & Branny's mom trying to sabotage them? Bullshit Source: http://parrishmiller.com/narcissists.html Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 05:25:34 AM mom? is that you? when did you learn to use forums? lol
Seriously guys, give it up... all of this was stated and explained in detail, hence not a surprise. Now you have resorted to re-posting the same irrelevant info that didn't get much of a reaction in previous pages just to keep the useless FUD-thread alive. You've stated your case, given no credible evidence to back up your claims... time to give up? Any rational person would at this point... Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 05:37:43 AM mom? is that you? when did you learn to use forums? lol Seriously guys, give it up... all of this was stated and explained in detail, hence not a surprise. Now you have resorted to re-posting the same irrelevant info that didn't get much of a reaction in previous pages just to keep the useless FUD-thread alive. You've stated your case, given no credible evidence to back up your claims... time to give up? Any rational person would at this point... Tell me how it was stated in detail when the Prospectus only came out this past Monday and yesterday Benny stated that the warehouse has yet to close, in spite of such was suppose to happen by July 12, 2014? http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 http://s2.postimg.org/6xp4uyh5l/close.jpg How is it that I can present critical evidence, yet you state none exists? Hell, Benny Schlichter has yet to disclosed what he paid for it, a pretty Goddamn important piece of information left off prior to IPO come Monday, don't you think? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 05:48:01 AM Nope. It's being financed by other methods. Not relevant in the least. Nice man of straw though... time to give up... seriously, don't you have any other hobbies besides being a FUD spreading SPOD?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 05:53:48 AM Granted, these are characteristics of narcissistic mothers from a random website on the internet 1. Everything she does is deniable 2. She violates your boundaries. 3. She favoritizes. 4. She undermines 5. She demeans, criticizes and denigrates. 6. She makes you look crazy. 7. She's envious. 8. She's a liar in too many ways to count. 9. She has to be the center of attention all the time. 10. She manipulates your emotions in order to feed on your pain. 11. She's selfish and willful. 12. She's self-absorbed. 13. She is insanely defensive and is extremely sensitive to any criticism 14. She terrorizes 15. She's infantile and petty. 16. She's aggressive and shameless. 17. She "parentifies." 18. She's exploitative 19. She projects 20. She is never wrong about anything. 21. She seems to have no awareness that other people even have feelings. 22. She blames. 23. She destroys your relationships. 24. As a last resort she goes pathetic. I'm not WebMD but I was going to highlight the ones where I thought you fit. I realized it would be easier to highlight the ones you didn't fit under, since there were so few. I decided that would look weird and just let folks decide for themselves. Gleb, are you actually a doting narcissistic mother? Plot twist! You're Benny & Branny's mom trying to sabotage them? Bullshit Source: http://parrishmiller.com/narcissists.html I'm not even going to acknowledge this post, let alone quote it and add a reply. ::) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 06:01:35 AM I'm not even going to acknowledge this post, let alone quote it and add a reply. ::) I'm glad you have your "standards"... so, you done here? I think you are... or are you just going to repeat the same non-issues or dig for more personal info and expose it in a harassing manner? Not a new tactic... in fact I've seen many people troll way better and be a lot more original. At least be good at it if you're going to attempt to do it. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 06:55:02 AM I'm not even going to acknowledge this post, let alone quote it and add a reply. ::) I'm glad you have your "standards"... so, you done here? I think you are... or are you just going to repeat the same non-issues or dig for more personal info and expose it in a harassing manner? Not a new tactic... in fact I've seen many people troll way better and be a lot more original. At least be good at it if you're going to attempt to do it. Dope! Not done at all, for the issue has yet to be addressed. That said, fuck off! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703956.msg7987077#msg7987077 Quote Quote from: Augusto Croppo on July 23, 2014, 09:23:31 AM On 28th October 2013 the company BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED was formed by another company, GNL13 LIMITED: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQUWlhd2lTcm1NMWM/edit?usp=sharing On 3rd January 2014 the company BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED appointed a new director, JOHN KENTON FREEMAN: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit?usp=sharing On 3rd January 2014 the company BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED resigned the company GNL13 LIMITED as director: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQbzltMVAxNDhFejA/edit?usp=sharing In other words, the company which supposedly owns 40% of Coin Services LCC was formed by an entity completely unrelated to the matter in discussion. Then later appointed a new director know as John Kenton Freeman, an USA national with residential address in China. Now this company is being used to raise funds via unregistered securities issued by a Panama exchange. That raises more questions: at which date BIG TREND CAPITAL INVESTMENT LIMITED obtained 40% of Coin Services LCC? Who is JOHN KENTON FREEMAN and what is his track record in financial investments? Quote from: Benny1985 on July 22, 2014, 06:59:38 PM As such I asked John to provide nominee services while I retained complete control of BTCI Ltd. via a power of attorney and control of the company seals. So you certainly have a document which proves that, right? Many potential investors would like to see this document and verify the signature of John Kenton Freeman. Certainly. I will provide the document prior to fundraising. Only two days left for Mr. Righeous to provide. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 01:18:11 PM @Gleb Gamow: You have shown that Benny's staunches supporter [boldar] is, at best, Benny's proxy in your post here:
... http://www.ebay.ph/itm/PCI-e-express-GPU-16X-16x-Riser-Extender-Card-Unpowered-USA-SELLER-/141338340809?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item20e86bedc9 ... Item location: Circleville, Ohio, United States ... A less giving person than boldar would have ended his participation in this thread right there and then, yet he continues to contribute in the only way he knows how--by sacrificing himself on the altar of Hilarity. All for a few chuckles from the crowd. Pointing out that his hapless idiot act has degenerated from lulworthy to pathetic would be ungenteel, so we are bound by etiquette to look on and laugh... Responding, at least occasionally, with polite applause. Bravo, boldar, bravissimo! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: QuestionAuthority on July 26, 2014, 05:23:27 PM The following post is what Benjamin Schlichter is avoiding at all cost: The long awaited, epic 68,000 tears post you'll been waiting for, with apologies for the delay, albeit it wasn't a Fortnight™. Whats the status of the 0.04c/kwh and 68k sq ft building? How does a successful IPO affect the timetable or progress of this lease? What happens to the old HVAC and electric equipment after you move the operation? Last time you built a mining facility the construction seemed to take couple weeks too long cutting into profits. Will this time be better? 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. 2. It would help ensure that we can close the deal if any additional capital was/is needed for facility acquisition. As-is, the building is usable for retail/distribution, but not for larger scale mining. The facility is equipped with, at a minimum, 800a/208v service, but we need to continue investigation of the current capacity to see what maximum deployment is when we move in. 3. We will likely cut out the current HVAC equipment to be moved to the new facility. Furthermore, the facility is already equipped with a large number of air handlers/compressors. It was a former hardware sale company (think Lowes, but a mom & pop building). Regrettably, we could have purchased dozens of HVAC units at a fraction of retail when they liquidated the assets of the company. But there is still a reasonable amount of hardware available for utilization upon move-in. 4. We continued to pay out dividends regardless of where the facility was. Since our pivot involves a more retail-centric offering, we can put money into hardware resales, while ensuring that the HVAC/electric is done in a proper way. Once that is done, we'll leverage liquid capital from hardware sales to move into mining. Even then, I believe that we can broker a deal with companies like ZeusMiner that are willing to sell (or even give) you hardware if you're willing to split coin generation with them. This could be a scenario where the investor pays only for HVAC/electric installation, while we leverage said deal and merely pay for electricity - offsetting any hardware costs that the investor could occur while waiting (and losing) potential mining profits. Astute readers are already aware of where I came up with my 68,000 [tears] figure. They all earned a star. For all other, well... what can I say but sorry. Note the date of the above post: July 24, 2014, 04:14:11 PM Before I go any further, let's all bow our heads and pray: Heavenly Father, Jehovah, please forgive me for what I'm about to disclose about our brethren. Amen, Hallelujah, and all that jazz. April 25, 2014: http://www.corecompute.com/bitcoin/bitcoin_20140425.html http://s23.postimg.org/dz0ci4zl7/IRC_Buy_A_Hash_Dialog.png Note the important part: Quote mrstickball btiefert: my company is in negotiation to purchase a very large warehouse for hashing / eCommerce sales for miners mrstickball its too large for what we need... its 68,000 square foot Boy, what I would give to see the first of those 68,000 tears a fallin'. Then again, Benny may be a tad slow, for earlier he conveniently forgot that he had a twin bother. Noticed I highlighted the 'is in negotiation' clause. You're probably wondering why I would do such. Without any further ado,... https://www.havelockinvestments.com/reportdownload.php?id=107 Quote Location: All of the IPO proceeds raise by BTCI shall be used for further investment into BuyAHash. BuyAHash states that a portion of IPO proceeds will go towards the lease of a large, 68,000 square foot facility which has been made available to the market. Under full ownership, BuyAHash seeks to utilize the facility for warehousing of our goods as well as hosting of their computer systems. This property is currently available for lease requiring approximately 100,000 USD for deposit and leasing funds. As per our last inspection, the property needs little modification to be utilized for our purposes. Additionally, we note that the target facility has access to industrial-grade electricity at a rate of $0.04 per KWh which is extremely competitive for a large scale hashing facility. Quote Physical Infrastructure – BuyAHash has located a building with 68,000 sq. ft of warehousing/industrial space for sale. We would like to lease this building, as it has the electrical infrastructure to handle significantly more hashing capacity than we currently have. Additionally, the additional space can be used to maintain a better distribution channel for products, due to the facility having loading docks for commercial trucks. Meet Benny's new Buy-A-Hash facility: http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 Conveniently located on Dry Run Creek sans a paddle: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=2150+N+Court+St,+Circleville,+OH&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&es_sm=122&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=_gDSU_-uAYi1yASrjIKwAg&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ http://s27.postimg.org/51mp3kgb7/2150_N_Court_St.png http://s18.postimg.org/bmp1nnmjt/Auction.png Quote Reserve public auction for commercial property. The auction will be held on Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON. Preview will be by appointment only and the day of the auction starting at 11:00am This property has a contiguous 68,000 square feet with docks, overhead doors, retail space, storage area, sliding outside doors and paved parking. Full utilities, security system store front area with the opportunity to The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Lot Size: 3.77 acres and approximately 68,000 squarefeet of commercial retail and warehouse facility. Annual Taxes: 15,018.05 http://www.innovativerevenuesolutions.net/cgi-bin/mnarcview.cgi?irsauction/20140612 Note the date of the auction: Thursday June 12th, 2014 at 12:00pm NOON 30 days later would fall on July, 12, 2014, when the building WOULD have be closed on. Yet, 12 days after that date (yesterday), Benny stated... Quote 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. Surely, there has to be a misunderstanding on my part, and I'm sure Benny will be on this non-self-moderated thread to set the record straight because if he doesn't, his Buy-A-Hash WON'T IPO, and RENT will kick the bucket within 24 hours, because clearly these guys are not being up-and-up with their current and future investors, in spite of them claiming to be good Christians. I wonder if the following two auctioneers located in or around Circleville, OH, know each other: Dan Schlichter (also a real estate agent) and John D. Rogers. Quote The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. Since Benny said he won the auction, that means he had to put down a minimum of 10% of $318,000 + $31,800, or $34,980 if he was the sole and winning bidder, otherwise his outlay is higher. https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg21789#msg21789 Quote My town is "Run down" in the fact there aren't a lot of jobs and a lot of commercial spaces for rent, thus why I can get everything cheaply. Translated: I have stacks of applications from businesses ready to least my unwanted/unneeded space of http://www.articlesweb.org/blog/wp-content/gallery/kleenex-marquee-tissues-are-reliable-for-use/kleenex-marquee-tissues-5.jpg Well your MO hasn't changed. Bruno, you always post these huge conglomerations of circular non proofs as if they're somehow telling this great story of injustice but they never do. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 05:34:23 PM Quote Well your MO hasn't changed. Bruno, you always post these huge conglomerations of circular non proofs as if they're somehow telling this great story of injustice but they never do. I suggest calling John Rogers at 614-499-5257 to make sure he starts telling people who call that you did indeed win the 68,000 sq. ft warehouse located at 2150 N Court St. in Circleville, OH, formally known as Circleville Hardware, for at the moment such is not the case. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 05:42:30 PM There is no "crowd" in fact, there is little interest in this "witch-hunt thread" that is quite akin to a Monty Python skit. Only not nearly as clever.
Fact: I list some of Benny's products on ebay to expand the base of potential buyers and they are drop-shipped to the customer. This is something that is quite common in sales to service multiple markets. I'm not sure how this would make me his "proxy", as I live hundreds of miles away. Regardless, it's nothing relevant to the offering on Havelock. Still plenty of time left to provide aforementioned documents. Again, repeating the same non-relevant info, (much of which has already been addressed had you bothered to read) does not make it right. It just means that you're wasting your time to keep repeating it to keep this useless dying thread alive. If you had actual legitimate concerns, you could post them on the thread and they would be answered and not moderated... but you have nothing but insults and vitriol and that is why your posts are moderated. If you had anything substantial you wouldn't need to resort to petty tactics like name-calling and using "BOLD RED LETTERING!!!" (oh, noes) Just 1) admit that you are motivated my your fabricated opinion, 2) don't invest, and 3) move along to spread your FUD somewhere else. or better yet... find a constructive hobby. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 06:00:24 PM There is no "crowd" in fact, there is little interest in this "witch-hunt thread" that is quite akin to a Monty Python skit. Only not nearly as clever. Fact: I list some of Benny's products on ebay to expand the base of potential buyers and they are drop-shipped to the customer. This is something that is quite common in sales to service multiple markets. I'm not sure how this would make me his "proxy", as I live hundreds of miles away. Regardless, it's nothing relevant to the offering on Havelock. Still plenty of time left to provide aforementioned documents. Again, repeating the same non-relevant info, (much of which has already been addressed had you bothered to read) does not make it right. It just means that you're wasting your time to keep repeating it to keep this useless dying thread alive. If you had actual legitimate concerns, you could post them on the thread and they would be answered and not moderated... but you have nothing but insults and vitriol and that is why your posts are moderated. If you had anything substantial you wouldn't need to resort to petty tactics like name-calling and using "BOLD RED LETTERING!!!" (oh, noes) Just admit 1) that you are motivated my your fabricated opinion, 2) don't invest, and 3) move along to spread your FUD somewhere else. or better yet... find a constructive hobby. Golly Geezzzzzzzz! Exactly what I was told while exposing Danny Brewster. Next time I'm in town, let's enjoy some brewskis over at Einstein's (http://atlanta.gaycities.com/restaurants/60013-einsteins). Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 06:03:34 PM Another post Benny Schlichter deleted from his self-moderated thread:
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote When will the actual issuer of this security, the HK d00d, post on this forum? What's his name again? John Kenton Freeman http://www.peoplefinders.com/property-search/OH+Circleville/1414+N+Court+St/260577891+PA Quote Mailing address for Michael John Freeman is 1414 N Court St, Circleville OH http://centralohiovisionsource.com/ Quote Kenton Family Eye Care, Inc. 401 North Court Street Circleville, OH 43113 68,000 sq. ft. warehouse address is 2150 N Court St, Circleville, OH http://who.godaddy.com/whoisstd.aspx?domain=20yearbillionaire.com&prog_id=GoDaddy Quote Domain Name: 20YEARBILLIONAIRE.COM Registry Domain ID: 1523159695_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com Update Date: 2012-10-08 04:49:34 Creation Date: 2008-10-07 14:34:54 Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2014-10-07 14:34:54 Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC Registrar IANA ID: 146 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.480-624-2505 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited Registry Registrant ID: Registrant Name: Brandon Schlichter Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: 1274 N Court St Registrant City: Circleville Registrant State/Province: Ohio Registrant Postal Code: 43113 Registrant Country: United States Registrant Phone: +1.7405711606 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 06:06:45 PM Another post Benny Schlichter deleted from his self-moderated thread:
When will the actual issuer of this security, the HK d00d, post on this forum? What's his name again? My reply was deleted as well. Boy, I bet Brothers Schlick can't wait till Monday rolls around so that they can get these IPO allegations behind them. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 06:11:08 PM There is no "crowd" in fact, there is little interest in this "witch-hunt thread" that is quite akin to a Monty Python skit. Only not nearly as clever. Fact: I list some of Benny's products on ebay to expand the base of potential buyers and they are drop-shipped to the customer. This is something that is quite common in sales to service multiple markets. I'm not sure how this would make me his "proxy", as I live hundreds of miles away. Regardless, it's nothing relevant to the offering on Havelock. ... You are, at this point, an admitted part of Benny's operation. You are also engaging in the sale and promotion of unregistered securities in violation of securities regulations as found in R.C. 1707.01 to 1707.45. That's just a starter, only state level. Care 4 sum FED stuffs? Keep going :) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 06:22:59 PM ...John Kenton Freeman... Quote Mailing address for Michael John Freeman is 1414 N Court St, Circleville OH ...Lol, so he basically asked his neighbor to set up a HK shell for him? A US person? THAT's his proxy? It's as brilliant as running an internet proxy from the IP you're trying to hide :D Wonder if Mr. Freeman realises what sort of shit his buddy got him into ::) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 06:44:40 PM The Prospectus for Buy-Some-Hash was gleaned from http://www.tooeasy.io/prospectus/ of which has a timestamp of GMT: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:48:20 GMT
The same info can be seen here: http://www.datatank-mining.com/files/DataTank_Mining_Ops_Prospectus.pdf Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 07:00:19 PM By "Solving the mystery" you mean "putting words into google and taking screenshots"... your mother must be so proud. I entered the full name, "John Kenton Freeman," exactly as it is listed in the corporate registration as archived HERE," into Google. Like so: http://s27.postimg.org/g653ctt5f/Capture.jpg The results were rather limited: The [now locked] IPO thread, and criminal records. Nothing else. What should a reasonable person in my position assume, failing a statement from Mr. Freeman, the [alleged] issuer of this security, in the thread promoting it? Especially in light of Mr. Schlichter's promise that such a statement would be made? (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 07:13:07 PM Or this guy: https://www.facebook.com/johnfreeman238?fref=ufi
http://s28.postimg.org/g4gyilb3h/John_Kenton_Freeman.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 07:16:35 PM Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 07:21:44 PM So, basically, you have no idea, so you're just going to post screenshots to you typing a name into Google... go out and get some sunshine...
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 07:29:38 PM So, basically, you have no idea, so you're just going to post screenshots to you typing a name into Google... go out and get some sunshine... You nailed it, bro! The more Brothers Schlick elude, the more we try to solve the mystery ourselves. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bad_1183463294 Quote Hearing for American man who raped underaged Daughter HONG KONG � An American man accused of raping his daughter and posting videos of the abuse online was due to appear today in a Hong Kong court. Kenneth John Freeman, a fugitive on America's most-wanted lists, was expected to challenge a request to extradite him to the United States, as he had indicated through his lawyer in the last hearing in May. The proceedings had been adjourned for two months to give the United States time to prepare supporting documents for Freeman's extradition. He has remained in custody during the period. Freeman, a 44-year-old bodybuilder, has been charged in Benton County Superior Court in Washington state with three counts of child rape and jumping bail. Freeman faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if convicted. He also faces federal charges of producing and distributing child pornography. Freeman was arrested at a Hong Kong checkpoint on the border with mainland China in May after fleeing Seattle last year, after his 17-year-old daughter told her mother he had assaulted her four years earlier. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 07:31:44 PM By "Solving the mystery" you mean "putting words into google and taking screenshots"... your mother must be so proud.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 07:47:20 PM By "Solving the mystery" you mean "putting words into google and taking screenshots"... your mother must be so proud. I entered the full name, "John Kenton Freeman," exactly as it is listed in the corporate registration as archived HERE, (https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6gZtLSqKPzQY05JZm1MSVNFaEk/edit) http://s30.postimg.org/jfbdtarm9/Capture.jpg ...into Google. Like so: http://s27.postimg.org/g653ctt5f/Capture.jpg The results were rather limited: The [now locked] IPO thread, and criminal records. Nothing else. Feel free to replicate my experiment :) What should a reasonable person in my position assume, failing a statement from Mr. Freeman, the [alleged] issuer of this security, in the thread promoting it? Especially in light of Mr. Schlichter's promise that such a statement would be made? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 07:57:22 PM I believe that a reasonable person would assume that you are simply a troll with nothing better to do with your time... with so many people on the planet, they are going to be used multiple times regardless of the combination you place them in. again, you have nothing.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: boldar on July 26, 2014, 07:58:51 PM Also, I put my own name into that mugshots website... and I got hits from my own county... sadly none of the pictures were of me. :(
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 26, 2014, 08:23:43 PM You are intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
I haven't entered the name into a mugshot website. I entered it into Google. The results were mugshot websites. And NOTHING ELSE. If you continue to engage in the sale and promotion of unregistered securities in violation of securities regulations, you soon will be able to obtain similar results from Google using your own name. Good things come to those who wait :) *Notice the "edit" button above all of your posts? It's meant to be used in the event of you feeling the urge to share moar of your wisdom with Bitcoiners. Please use it, instead of shitting up the thread with multiple consecutive posts. ty Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: bbxx on July 26, 2014, 08:25:44 PM this scam is so funny
lol. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 26, 2014, 11:57:08 PM this scam is so funny lol. Instead of addressing concerns head-on, Brothers Schlick opt to delete posts. Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote OIC, ty. You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below: ,,, Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities? Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit] http://mugshots-directory.com/offender-image/81b/HART-KY_5123-JOHN-FREEMAN.jpg *edited No, I do not believe its the same Mr. Freeman. By the way, the "Michael John Freeman" that Mr. Gamrow posted earlier. That is a local doctor, and I am certain that he would be very unhappy knowing that some lunatic on the forum posted his address. So, let me get this straight. I'm a lunatic for supposedly posting an address of some Dr. John Freeman in Circleville, OH, but you're not a lunatic for giving up 40% of your business to some John Kenton Freeman that may, or may not be the man depicted above. Also, I'm a lunatic for proving that you don't even own the warehouse located at 2150 N Court St, Circleville, OH, but you're the sane fuck for not proving that you do indeed own it, albeit still looking for investors to close the deal after supposedly putting down a non-refundable deposit of at least $32,000. http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 Quote The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=707341.msg8009632#msg8009632 Quote We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. Looks to me like all is not going so well, for you're requesting BTC to grow your LTC biz come Monday. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 27, 2014, 02:21:29 AM Another post that Benny Schlichter of Circleville, OH, has deleted on his self-moderated thread trying to amass $1.4M via BTC for his LTC farm to be located at 2150 N Court St, Circlevill, OH.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote To prove what such an idiot Benny Schlichter is, once a post is posted on his self-moderated thread, it's mirrored at Bitcointa.lk. Once he deletes a post, it's most likely posted elsewhere at least once, thus making at least two copies of the very posts he's doing his damndest to rid. What a fuckin' genius! And he's an SEO expert to boot. ::) Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if he attended WNU (What Nut University) for seven years to get his degree like Joshua Zipkin did, another person I exposed. Benny, you're fuckin' with the wrong person. All you had to do was address the concerns, but you opted to go another route. Fine! It's your call. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 27, 2014, 02:24:16 AM Just like Danny Brewster, Benny Schlichter of Circleville, OHIO, is trying to use Havelock to IPO his vision, going even further by deleting posts on his self-moderated thread like the one below.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote I dont get why there is a made up person owning part of the company?? can someone gimme the breakdown what going on here, is there a made up person who owns a BTC company again......lol Hi stompysteve, There isn't a made up person that owns part of the company. There is a director for BTCI that they are claiming doesn't exist. I am working to get him to come on the forum and make a statement about his involvement with BTCI as a director, and his involvement within the project. I did not anticipate the negative attacks from NotLambChop/IPOMagic and Gleb Gamrow that would force me to get him on the forums in a quick manner to somehow belay their fears that he is not real. John has been a part of this project (on the BTCI side) for nearly a year now as an adviser/director. Even then, I am certain that showing documents/information about John will solve any argument made by these people. Quote Insert Quote Only a fool that is uneducated will never understand the logic of a company and the details that are fully explained here about it, if you don't read English and understand it don't post at all. If you want mining equipment contact the guy, meet up with him if you are putting money on the line to make sure it's legit like anyone else who do invest time into a company. Common sense seems to be hard to find in the crypto industry. That is what I do not get, Jayson. I have yet to get a phone call, E-mail, or visit from either of these people. As I've stated, I will gladly meet them at the facility or at Cryptolina. I am unsure how much more I can make myself available. OIC, ty. You may have missed my question from the last page, quoted below: ,,, Now when will the gentleman be posting an acknowledgement of his name being used to promote unregistered securities? Also, doing a search for "John Kenton Freeman" gives only your [edit] http://mugshots-directory.com/offender-image/81b/HART-KY_5123-JOHN-FREEMAN.jpg *edited No, I do not believe its the same Mr. Freeman. By the way, the "Michael John Freeman" that Mr. Gamrow posted earlier. That is a local doctor, and I am certain that he would be very unhappy knowing that some lunatic on the forum posted his address. Yep, like I said, Benny Schlichter is a fuckin' genus. Only an idiot from Ohio would team up with a guy and work for him a year and not know who the fuck he is. Hell, we knew more about Danny Brewster this this fuckin' make believe John Kenton Freeman. I also see that you're covering every base as much as possible, going as far as stating that EVEN IF YOU DO RELEASE INFO, WE STILL WON'T BELIEVE IT. To that I say, only one hand per player, otherwise we will be forced to do the same a la no matter what you say, we'll refute it, but let's not piss off the dealer. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 27, 2014, 07:18:28 PM Lulz. This is some serious neckbeard assburgers shit. When was the last time you creatures got out and saw some sunshine?
Make monies not drama. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 12:48:10 AM About only 15 hours left till IPO, whereupon prior Benny will be releasing to the world who the fuck is John Kenton Freeman.
Also, to date, Benjamin Schlichter has yet to provide proof that he did indeed win the auction for the 68,000 sq ft warehouse located at 2150 N Court St, Circleville, OH, in spite of the auctioneer claiming such was not the case. What part of being scammed by a couple redneck fat asses don't you fuckers understand? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 02:26:49 AM Hey bro, do you have anyone looking after you that you can get to check that you're getting the dosage on your meds right?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Haze on July 28, 2014, 03:07:09 AM I have invested in quite a few businesses and I must say, I DO NOT feel like this is a scam like some people above are saying. It is clear, to me at least, that Benny is an honest businessman that actually updates shareholders, unlike many other CEOs. I mean if this was a scam, Benny could've ran right after LitecoinGlobal closed back in October of last year. Many reputable users have visited the BAH facility and the Amazon page has plenty of legitimate sales.
To the sceptical users: I really do appreciate the detective work and valid questions/concerns. There can never be too much of this, but raising a concern and immediately screaming 'scam' not only doesn't give Benny the time to address your concerns/provide evidence, but it also creates uncertainty for potential investors in a legitimate company (unless those valid concerns are not properly addressed). I myself ask questions, wait 2-3 days and if the person (in this case Benny) responds to another questions posted after me, then I start freaking out. This has not happened with BAH so please let Benny gather evidence and address the valid concerns you raise. Thanks. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 03:44:05 AM Hey bro, do you have anyone looking after you that you can get to check that you're getting the dosage on your meds right? Dude, it's obvious that you specifically created this account to fuck with me. So, let's stop beating around the bush and meat-up so that I can fuck you in the ass. I'll leave it to you if want me on my meds or not while I get my dick all covered up with your shit. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 03:48:10 AM I have invested in quite a few businesses and I must say, I DO NOT feel like this is a scam like some people above are saying. It is clear, to me at least, that Benny is an honest businessman that actually updates shareholders, unlike many other CEOs. I mean if this was a scam, Benny could've ran right after LitecoinGlobal closed back in October of last year. Many reputable users have visited the BAH facility and the Amazon page has plenty of legitimate sales. To the sceptical users: I really do appreciate the detective work and valid questions/concerns. There can never be too much of this, but raising a concern and immediately screaming 'scam' not only doesn't give Benny the time to address your concerns/provide evidence, but it also creates uncertainty for potential investors in a legitimate company (unless those valid concerns are not properly addressed). I myself ask questions, wait 2-3 days and if the person (in this case Benny) responds to another questions posted after me, then I start freaking out. This has not happened with BAH so please let Benny gather evidence and address the valid concerns you raise. Thanks. I'm quoting you because it's a well-thought-out post. I only wished Benny would had replied the same way a few days ago oppose to taking the route he opted to take, thus causing me, among others, to hunt boogeymen that may, or may not, exist. Thank you for your post, Haze. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 02:10:07 PM Call this guy and ask him how legal HASH & RENT are
Philip Moustakis Senior Attorney Division of Enforcement United States Securities & Exchange Commission 3 World Financial Center, Suite 400, New York, NY 10281-1022 (212) 336-0542 He is handling the Trendon Shavers matter, if I actually had a vested interest in either of the two IPO's I would do it myself. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: CanaryInTheMine on July 28, 2014, 06:05:17 PM About only 15 hours left till IPO, whereupon prior Benny will be releasing to the world who the fuck is John Kenton Freeman. I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp.Also, to date, Benjamin Schlichter has yet to provide proof that he did indeed win the auction for the 68,000 sq ft warehouse located at 2150 N Court St, Circleville, OH, in spite of the auctioneer claiming such was not the case. What part of being scammed by a couple redneck fat asses don't you fuckers understand? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 06:06:18 PM Post it.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: CanaryInTheMine on July 28, 2014, 06:16:46 PM Post it. I don't see the need to do so. I am confirming that stated info is correct. Folks can make up their own mind based on our reputations, or lack of them.Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 06:28:35 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business.
Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 06:33:12 PM Post it. I don't see the need to do so. I am confirming that stated info is correct. Folks can make up their own mind based on our reputations, or lack of them.Damn, I should've played this card and not post the following... Quote I don't know why I should trust 'some guy on the internet' over what my legal team is telling me. The Wisdom of Crowds (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds) comes to mind, just like the convos found elsewhere concerning a dude with a similar MO seeking advice and sharing experiences: http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/177042-building-real-estate-empire-2.html#post2179878 Quote Assuming funding stalls, why not issue more shares at that time? With your current numbers you're simply ripping off your investors. The returns they're getting is not worth the implied risk. Note: I admire your ability to convince investors that they're making good returns, however let's be honest -- they're not. Based on your numbers: $400k raised $6.1k gross income -- assuming 100% occupancy. 6.1*12 = $73.2k gross annual income $73.2*.3 = $21.96 going to the investors assuming expenses of $0, then their return equals $21.96/400 = 5.49% Seeing as the risk with such an investment is insanely high (30 of the 40 companies went under), a 5.49% return is nowhere close to justified. Furthermore, when you calculate expenses + income tax, then it's likely your "investors" will get slightly above a 2% return. ... With that said, let's calculate your assumed profit for this year: $73.2*.7 = $51.24k in rental income. Obviously expenses have to be deducted from this, but let's assume you're left with $20k. On top of that, you now own $450k in assets. $450k * .7 = $315k. So far this year you've earned $315k + $20k = $335k. Your investors on the other hand have not. Once again, I admire your hustle. But, who am I to argue with success when the dude that the above was directed toward purchases houses via paying for them with Bitcoin: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/21tygc/irs_should_give_guidance_on_like_kind_assets_for/cggz62e Quote Possibly, although thus far I've bought 5 houses via bitcoin and set to close on #6 in a week or so. Brandon, if for some reason funding ceases via this avenue, this dude on YouTube, also name Brandon, will show you how to earn $8,000 a day via the Google Money System (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv57GqAUsyI). Whatever happens, make sure you stay off of John T. Reed's (rhymes with John Kenton Freeman) shit list: http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/167067-would-you-interested-real-estate-investment-trust.html#post1912505 Quote I'll have to go through my inherited pile of "Millionaire real estate investor for 0% down" books that I somehow inherited from family members. When I checked a year or two ago, there were a few prolific REI guys who wrote books who are now in jail. Carleton Sheets was one of them that almost wound up in jail. I know quite a few of his followers did because he essentially was showing people how to lie on FHA documents for 0% down financing on investment homes. Edit : Several of Robert Allen's followers were also arrested. Edit 2 : Here's a list of guys that are in jail, arrested or otherwise legal limbo who have been involved in REI books : http://www.johntreed.com/Reedgururating.html In closing (no pun intended), a blast from the past: http://www.biggerpockets.com/users/schockergd ~~~ http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/48/topics/12654-first-deal- http://s9.postimg.org/f2t72dxfj/Brandon_Schlichter_2007.jpg I wish I had a brother that made $129,905 A Day: http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/157349-129-905-day.html https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5579/14769606235_ea73395797_b.jpg Apologies for not yet linking where the dude above and his brother own a Litecoin Pharm, but that's probably not important. ::) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 07:19:45 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 07:36:40 PM @hayek: Let me see if I'm following your logic re. RiverBoatBTC's operation--are you suggesting that if he is breaking the law, it's reasonable for Branny and Benny to do it?
Regardless, this thread is not about him, try to stay on topic. P.S. your money is likely gone, with no greater fools waiting in the wings to return it to you. I'm not even sorry for you. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 07:42:56 PM @hayek: Let me see if I'm following your logic re. RiverBoatBTC's operation--are you suggesting that if he is breaking the law, it's reasonable for Branny and Benny to do it? Regardless, this thread is not about him, try to stay on topic. P.S. your money is likely gone, with no greater fools waiting in the wings to return it to you. I'm not even sorry for you. Where did I suggest that? I pointed out that there are multiple people who have contributed nothing of value to the market, who hide behind proxies and extort funds from new securities, trolling and manufacturing false claims until they are paid off, because they have so very little to offer the world beyond their internet tantrums =) It's OK NotALamp. How many Bitcoin have you made off your blackmail business? On the bright side I guess you don't have to worry about registering a security as an extortionist =) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 07:47:39 PM ...your blackmail business... http://s16.postimg.org/mj5gusa05/what.gif dear stooge: there's no one here to blackmail. The idiots do their kitteh crimez in broad daylight, with such a trail of evidence that I wouldn't be able to hide it if I wanted to :D Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 07:52:10 PM The simple fact is Lamby post proof, you guys just talk. :-\
No one has seen a Offer to purchase on the warehouse except a 17 year old kid and a shareholder. He wants Over a million dollars in funding which disquals the IPO from any crowdfunding exemptions or other type loopholes They refuse to post documents that will be public record. which makes 0 sense The brothers have failed at everything else except getting money out of the bitcoin world Please correct me if you can prove any of these wrong. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: augustocroppo on July 28, 2014, 08:00:35 PM I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp. You are not in possession of "real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement". If you have anything at all, it must be a digitalized copy of such documents. Moreover, you are 17 years old and your identity is unclear. We cannot know how much credible you are to attest for the authenticity of such documents. Your reputation as trader do not grant you credibility to vouch for unseen documents. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: CanaryInTheMine on July 28, 2014, 08:05:23 PM I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp. You are not in possession of "real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement". If you have anything at all, it must be a digitalized copy of such documents. Moreover, you are 17 years old and your identity is unclear. We cannot know how much credible you are to attest for the authenticity of such documents. Your reputation as trader do not grant you credibility to vouch for unseen documents. I wish I was 17, if I knew then what I know now... in fact, I do posses said documents. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:06:45 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 08:10:26 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:11:02 PM @hayek: Let me see if I'm following your logic re. RiverBoatBTC's operation--are you suggesting that if he is breaking the law, it's reasonable for Branny and Benny to do it? Regardless, this thread is not about him, try to stay on topic. P.S. your money is likely gone, with no greater fools waiting in the wings to return it to you. I'm not even sorry for you. Where did I suggest that? I pointed out that there are multiple people who have contributed nothing of value to the market, who hide behind proxies and extort funds from new securities, trolling and manufacturing false claims until they are paid off, because they have so very little to offer the world beyond their internet tantrums =) It's OK NotALamp. How many Bitcoin have you made off your blackmail business? On the bright side I guess you don't have to worry about registering a security as an extortionist =) I have never contributed anything of value to the Bitcoin space: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=430540.0 http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5506/12120323653_c8d1720e03_z.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:14:34 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? He was even accused of extortion over there: Sounds like extortion to me. Seriously guys? You are going to tell a charity "I'll donate but only if you take it in bitcoin"? What a shitty way to deal with charities. Is this really how you want people to view this community? Gage/Gleb has a long history of using his temper to get his way. Remember that post about controlling mothers? Also, Gleb this page says you died: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 08:14:50 PM I am in possession of the signed real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement with mentioned HK Corp. You are not in possession of "real estate agreement as well as the executed agreement". If you have anything at all, it must be a digitalized copy of such documents. Moreover, you are 17 years old and your identity is unclear. We cannot know how much credible you are to attest for the authenticity of such documents. Your reputation as trader do not grant you credibility to vouch for unseen documents. Maybe you should tag the other side with negative trust like they are taggin us? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:15:19 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to two other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:15:50 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Bullshit. Post proof you are not dead: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:17:51 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? He was even accused of extortion over there: Sounds like extortion to me. Seriously guys? You are going to tell a charity "I'll donate but only if you take it in bitcoin"? What a shitty way to deal with charities. Is this really how you want people to view this community? Gage/Gleb has a long history of using his temper to get his way. Remember that post about controlling mothers? Also, Gleb this page says you died: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 Dude, I did, but due to the grace of Jehovah I was given a second chance. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:18:53 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Bullshit. Post proof you are not dead: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 No problem, dude. Give me a sec. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 08:20:11 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? He was even accused of extortion over there: Sounds like extortion to me. Seriously guys? You are going to tell a charity "I'll donate but only if you take it in bitcoin"? What a shitty way to deal with charities. Is this really how you want people to view this community? Gage/Gleb has a long history of using his temper to get his way. Remember that post about controlling mothers? Also, Gleb this page says you died: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 Dude, I did, but due to the grace of Jehovah I was given a second chance. You should post it again, I mean that's how you play this game right? Keep re-posting, throwing tantrums, and so on until you are paid off? Your mental state has seemed to really deteriorate though from your previous activities. You sure you're alright? Extortion business taking its toll on you? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:31:33 PM No problem, dude. Give me a sec. GLEB GAMOW IS DEAD. DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYTHING HE SAYS FROM BEYOND THE GRAVE https://i.imgur.com/IZJe8jL.png Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:33:52 PM Stealing a dead man's identity is a very serious offense Gleb.
GLEB GAMOW STEALS THE IDENTITY OF SENIORS AND COLLECTS THERE WELFARE CHECKS. This is easy, no wonder you do it. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 08:34:34 PM No problem, dude. Give me a sec. GLEB GAMOW IS DEAD. DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYTHING HE SAYS FROM BEYOND THE GRAVE https://i.imgur.com/IZJe8jL.png Thats his father you dumb shit... Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:35:57 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 08:36:27 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. No but I can find people and I research things for a living http://s11.postimg.org/xdqefts1r/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/xdqefts1r/) I hope you did not leave you real name laying around this forum ;) might get a knock on the door. Keep trying buttercup, maybe one day I will get on my real account and hit you with some negative feed back ;) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 08:36:49 PM Mad screencap skillz, brah!
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: IPO Magic on July 28, 2014, 08:42:30 PM Gentlemen! You are not treating this super srs IPO with the levity it deserves!
Disinterested party totally not NotLambchop, ~IPO Magic Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:43:10 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Bullshit. Post proof you are not dead: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 No problem, dude. Give me a sec. Here we go, bud: https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3869/14583949709_fb237b747c_c.jpg https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3908/14583970398_0d0dbe096b_b.jpg Outta 344,449 (currently) user accounts on this forum, I'm the ONLY one brave enough to post their true vitals depicting an official state ID sans masking off ANY pertinent information. Unless you're willing to do the same, back off, otherwise meat me at my home, whereupon I'll take you behind my Honest Abe totem pole and fuck you in your ass like there's no tomorrow. http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2847/9369073186_f739db32e7_c.jpg Remember, fuckface, I'm the one that exposed BFL more than all other users combined. I came here to expose Havelock, but was met with HASH and RENT, thus opting to see what's up here first prior to diggin' a little deeper, of which I WILL. Not a threat, but a promise. To be clear, I don't want, nor will except, a single satoshi for my efforts. I have no shares in any entities nor do I mine. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:43:16 PM Man, further proof that Phinneus is a scammer:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/phinnaeus-gage-aka-bruno-kucinskas-where-are-you.334569/ Quote You have my money and I would like it back, you received the check for the insurance claim on Monday 6/16/2014 in the afternoon and have now stopped answering the phone and seemingly disappeared from this forum at the same time. I have been very patient but considering this has been going on for 2 and a half months now my patience are wearing thin. Please return either my BTC that was originally sent to you or the money from the insurance payment immediately or I will be forced to take legal proceedings to recover these funds. Dude runs off with a guys coin until he gets called out publicly, comes back as Gleb: Quote Rumor has it that he didn't attend the conference today because he's slightly under the weather due to something he ate (most likely, given the symptoms). Rumor also has it that he had lunch yesterday with edd and Rassah, leaving early to go home, but stopping at a polish deli to stock up on sausages, et al. perhaps upon eating such added to his/my discomfort. Pretending ;) for a moment that this account is indeed owned by Bruno (don't tell theymos ::)), he wishes to formally apologize to ccollectables for the misfortune, sans going into any details as to why such occurred. ccollectables can also keep the miner hoping that he's able to salvage any value from it, adding to the ~$132 sent to him. Ironically, he's now probably the only person who has successfully ROIed off purchasing an AMT miner. Peace. PS: I'm also curious to know the story behind this disappearance. Embarrassment! To further smokescreen his identity and then only pays back the debt once a hero board member gave him a personal phone call. He even had some cops called on him for the scam: Quote I have contacted his local police and spoke to a detective in Sandwich, IL who was going to confirm that PG was who and lived where he claimed, I have not filed any sort of charges yet and would be willing to discuss your offer in pm before doing so if you truly wish to. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 08:45:03 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Bullshit. Post proof you are not dead: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 No problem, dude. Give me a sec. Here we go, bud: https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3869/14583949709_fb237b747c_c.jpg https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3908/14583970398_0d0dbe096b_b.jpg Outta 344,449 (currently) user accounts on this forum, I'm the ONLY one brave enough to post their true vitals depicting an official state ID sans masking off ANY pertinent information. Unless you're willing to do the same, back off, otherwise meat me at my home, whereupon I'll take you behind my Honest Abe totem pole and fuck you in your ass like there's no tomorrow. http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2847/9369073186_f739db32e7_c.jpg Remember, fuckface, I'm the one that exposed BFL more than all other users combined. I came here to expose Havelock, but was met with HASH and RENT, thus opting to see what's up here first prior to diggin' a little deeper, of with I WILL. Not a threat, but a promise. To be clear, I don't want, nor will except, a single satoshi for my efforts. I have no shares in any entities nor do I mine. There you have it. Gleb posts his faked Silk Road documents online confirming the identity he has stolen. Internet says he is dead. White Knight dethroned. /thread. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:45:46 PM No problem, dude. Give me a sec. GLEB GAMOW IS DEAD. DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYTHING HE SAYS FROM BEYOND THE GRAVE https://i.imgur.com/IZJe8jL.png Like I said, Jehovah made me better. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:47:08 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. Looks like we're fucked, RiverBoatBTC! hayek caught the tater. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 08:49:19 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. Looks like we're fucked, RiverBoatBTC! hayek caught the tater. I have to say, you are one crazy looking mofo Gleb lol Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:50:04 PM Man, further proof that Phinneus is a scammer: https://bitcointa.lk/threads/phinnaeus-gage-aka-bruno-kucinskas-where-are-you.334569/ Quote You have my money and I would like it back, you received the check for the insurance claim on Monday 6/16/2014 in the afternoon and have now stopped answering the phone and seemingly disappeared from this forum at the same time. I have been very patient but considering this has been going on for 2 and a half months now my patience are wearing thin. Please return either my BTC that was originally sent to you or the money from the insurance payment immediately or I will be forced to take legal proceedings to recover these funds. Dude runs off with a guys coin until he gets called out publicly, comes back as Gleb: Quote Rumor has it that he didn't attend the conference today because he's slightly under the weather due to something he ate (most likely, given the symptoms). Rumor also has it that he had lunch yesterday with edd and Rassah, leaving early to go home, but stopping at a polish deli to stock up on sausages, et al. perhaps upon eating such added to his/my discomfort. Pretending ;) for a moment that this account is indeed owned by Bruno (don't tell theymos ::)), he wishes to formally apologize to ccollectables for the misfortune, sans going into any details as to why such occurred. ccollectables can also keep the miner hoping that he's able to salvage any value from it, adding to the ~$132 sent to him. Ironically, he's now probably the only person who has successfully ROIed off purchasing an AMT miner. Peace. PS: I'm also curious to know the story behind this disappearance. Embarrassment! To further smokescreen his identity and then only pays back the debt once a hero board member gave him a personal phone call. He even had some cops called on him for the scam: Quote I have contacted his local police and spoke to a detective in Sandwich, IL who was going to confirm that PG was who and lived where he claimed, I have not filed any sort of charges yet and would be willing to discuss your offer in pm before doing so if you truly wish to. No cops came. Now, get back on track. We're discussing a $1M+ IPO here. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 08:51:51 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D.
http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:52:34 PM Makes 0 sense not to post it, it should not take people a act of god for a IPO to publish information that is VERY IMPORTANT to the business. Business stays private = Documents stay private Business goes public = ALL DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE DISCLOSED SINCE ITS A PUBLIC COMPANY Well thats the way companys work in the real world.... But in BTC land people make up the rules as they go and the shit needs to stop. And you're running an illegal gambling website through a shell affiliate program. Sorry that you're word isn't as important as someone who is listed as a trusted escrow provider. Gleb, that makes me wonder - have you ever created anything of value? What are your accolades? Only the first Bitcoin charity site where I've paid most expenses outta my pocket, and nary a satoshi donated was, or will ever be used for any other purpose except for what they're intended for, if that counts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52543.0 Full Disclosure: I don't have access to any of the bitcoins donated. Only Rassah and Roger Ver possess the private keys. So why is it again you can't use that account? I've already disclosed such to other users on this board: Matthew N. Wright and Bruce Wagner. Bullshit. Post proof you are not dead: http://www.beveragefamilyfh.com/fh/obituaries/obituary.cfm?o_id=950940&fh_id=13336 No problem, dude. Give me a sec. Here we go, bud: https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3869/14583949709_fb237b747c_c.jpg https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3908/14583970398_0d0dbe096b_b.jpg Outta 344,449 (currently) user accounts on this forum, I'm the ONLY one brave enough to post their true vitals depicting an official state ID sans masking off ANY pertinent information. Unless you're willing to do the same, back off, otherwise meat me at my home, whereupon I'll take you behind my Honest Abe totem pole and fuck you in your ass like there's no tomorrow. http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2847/9369073186_f739db32e7_c.jpg Remember, fuckface, I'm the one that exposed BFL more than all other users combined. I came here to expose Havelock, but was met with HASH and RENT, thus opting to see what's up here first prior to diggin' a little deeper, of with I WILL. Not a threat, but a promise. To be clear, I don't want, nor will except, a single satoshi for my efforts. I have no shares in any entities nor do I mine. There you have it. Gleb posts his faked Silk Road documents online confirming the identity he has stolen. Internet says he is dead. White Knight dethroned. /thread. What a fuckin' idiot! I want to go on record and state that I didn't get my fake ID from Silk Road. It came from...wait for it... http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000276071/polls_628290057_a541194601_1748_962107_poll_xlarge.jpeg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 08:55:36 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. Looks like we're fucked, RiverBoatBTC! hayek caught the tater. I have to say, you are one crazy looking mofo Gleb lol He is obviously highly unstable in the mental arena. Which makes it extremely sad, like rabid dog sad. Not much you can do for a person like this except wait for their mental state to break down to the point that they are institutionalized. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 08:59:40 PM Thats his father you dumb shit... So you guys know each other IRL? So this is a concerted effort among an organized group of criminals now. You admit your conspiracy in public? Big mistake boys. Looks like we're fucked, RiverBoatBTC! hayek caught the tater. I have to say, you are one crazy looking mofo Gleb lol You should have seen be at the Chicago Bitcoin Conference last week. I shaved the left side of head and right side of my beard. Seriously! Want to see the Great Phinn speak? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO-EGJhdx4U This was where I conned AMT out of a miner and sold it here on BitcoinTalk and tried to scam some dude in Texas after it was shipped damaged. ::) My side job was stealing barn wood at night till Josh of BFL exposed my scam there and had to cease operations, leaving me with only selling kiddie porn on Tor. http://bossip.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/goat-head-e1318855981712.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:01:33 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Did you find anything on when I was accused of raping a 14 year old girl once? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 09:02:03 PM If someone threatens to sexually assault someone over the Internet that's still illegal right?
Edit: I bet that wouldn't look good if you have a prior history. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:03:49 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Be careful driving through Oregon, IL. The police there have a bad habit of arresting dead people: http://www.oglecountylife.com/view_xml_entity.php?id=Ar00400&date=12-10-2012-4&bodyInfo=false&entity=article&toc_id=275 Quote At 6:14 p.m., Oregon Police arrested Bruno Kucinskas, age 52, of Sandwich, IL, for driving while license suspended. Kucinskas was also issued citations for operating an uninsured motor vehicle and for operation of a vehicle that is overweight on registration. Kucinskas was transported to the Ogle County jail. I honestly didn't know my IL DL was suspended and the insurance just lapsed. I may, or may not, knew I was overweight, but seriously didn't think DOT laws applied to wood in a pickup truck. I now know better and drive around Oregon when I'm overweight. ;D Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 09:04:06 PM From the description of the video:
"Phinaeuse Gage - a known bitcointalk.org member, travelled from illinois to philadelphia and met with AMT to see their legitimacy. After almost a month of written harassment, Phinnaeus saw the truth and decided AMT Miners is a good company after all." This just screams legitimacy for you Bruno. If someone threatens to sexually assault someone over the Internet that's still illegal right? Edit: I bet that wouldn't look good if you have a prior history. Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: hayek on July 28, 2014, 09:08:50 PM Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. I will probably just call Sandwich cops and just file a complaint and ask them to look in to it. Looks like Bruno has improved his tactics. Now he just refuses to accept the free visits people offer him (Which were made a week ago?) And instead just stands on the side screaming! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:09:48 PM From the description of the video: "Phinaeuse Gage - a known bitcointalk.org member, travelled from illinois to philadelphia and met with AMT to see their legitimacy. After almost a month of written harassment, Phinnaeus saw the truth and decided AMT Miners is a good company after all." This just screams legitimacy for you Bruno. If someone threatens to sexually assault someone over the Internet that's still illegal right? Edit: I bet that wouldn't look good if you have a prior history. Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. Dude, that's it! I confess! I have killed 14 people in Illinois and Tennessee and Wyoming (or was Montana). After I kill them, I fuck them in the ass, all the while yelling out, "Zig! Zig! Zigzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!" My dick got hard just penning this confession. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 09:10:08 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Be careful driving through Oregon, IL. The police there have a bad habit of arresting dead people: http://www.oglecountylife.com/view_xml_entity.php?id=Ar00400&date=12-10-2012-4&bodyInfo=false&entity=article&toc_id=275 Quote At 6:14 p.m., Oregon Police arrested Bruno Kucinskas, age 52, of Sandwich, IL, for driving while license suspended. Kucinskas was also issued citations for operating an uninsured motor vehicle and for operation of a vehicle that is overweight on registration. Kucinskas was transported to the Ogle County jail. I honestly didn't know my IL DL was suspended and the insurance just lapsed. I may, or may not, knew I was overweight, but seriously didn't think DOT laws applied to wood in a pickup truck. I now know better and drive around Oregon when I'm overweight. ;D You have 0 criminal records returned... you just got my service for free lol Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 09:10:47 PM Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. I will probably just call Sandwich cops and just file a complaint and ask them to look in to it. Looks like Bruno has improved his tactics. Now he just refuses to accept the free visits people offer him (Which were made a week ago?) And instead just stands on the side screaming! He has shown himself to be very, very unstable. No normal person will post what he has including very personal things you should not be showing the world. The police will definitely see the past complaint(s) it sounds like against him, and will likely visit him. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:12:52 PM Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. I will probably just call Sandwich cops and just file a complaint and ask them to look in to it. Looks like Bruno has improved his tactics. Now he just refuses to accept the free visits people offer him (Which were made a week ago?) And instead just stands on the side screaming! I'm willing to exchange with kind folks all day, bumping this thread to who knows where. There's not a motherfuckin' thing you guys can pin on me, and anything you throw my way I will toss back in kind, injecting humor as much as possible. Have it! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:17:42 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Be careful driving through Oregon, IL. The police there have a bad habit of arresting dead people: http://www.oglecountylife.com/view_xml_entity.php?id=Ar00400&date=12-10-2012-4&bodyInfo=false&entity=article&toc_id=275 Quote At 6:14 p.m., Oregon Police arrested Bruno Kucinskas, age 52, of Sandwich, IL, for driving while license suspended. Kucinskas was also issued citations for operating an uninsured motor vehicle and for operation of a vehicle that is overweight on registration. Kucinskas was transported to the Ogle County jail. I honestly didn't know my IL DL was suspended and the insurance just lapsed. I may, or may not, knew I was overweight, but seriously didn't think DOT laws applied to wood in a pickup truck. I now know better and drive around Oregon when I'm overweight. ;D You have 0 criminal records returned... you just got my service for free lol Seriously? I retract my post where I admit to raping a 14 year old girl in Nashville back in the late 80's I believe it was, albeit I was put on 1 year probation for contributing to the delinquency of a minor. (she was my girlfriend's babysitter, and I did purchase a six-pack of beer of which she partook with me being fully aware of what was going on, just like I told the DA and judge). Can't believe that didn't come up, hence now fully retracting all posts pertaining to this unfortunately episode in my life. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:18:59 PM Yeah, there are the cyber bullying bullshit laws and stuff, but in this case, someone probably should look into Bruno's mental state before he freaks out at a supermarket and kills some people or anally rape them, as he likes to say a lot. I will probably just call Sandwich cops and just file a complaint and ask them to look in to it. Looks like Bruno has improved his tactics. Now he just refuses to accept the free visits people offer him (Which were made a week ago?) And instead just stands on the side screaming! He has shown himself to be very, very unstable. No normal person will post what he has including very personal things you should not be showing the world. The police will definitely see the past complaint(s) it sounds like against him, and will likely visit him. Dude, it's not like I posted that I once was charged with raping a 14 year old girl once... wait... Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Zigz on July 28, 2014, 09:20:23 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Be careful driving through Oregon, IL. The police there have a bad habit of arresting dead people: http://www.oglecountylife.com/view_xml_entity.php?id=Ar00400&date=12-10-2012-4&bodyInfo=false&entity=article&toc_id=275 Quote At 6:14 p.m., Oregon Police arrested Bruno Kucinskas, age 52, of Sandwich, IL, for driving while license suspended. Kucinskas was also issued citations for operating an uninsured motor vehicle and for operation of a vehicle that is overweight on registration. Kucinskas was transported to the Ogle County jail. I honestly didn't know my IL DL was suspended and the insurance just lapsed. I may, or may not, knew I was overweight, but seriously didn't think DOT laws applied to wood in a pickup truck. I now know better and drive around Oregon when I'm overweight. ;D You have 0 criminal records returned... you just got my service for free lol You will need to check the court records websites and go to the specific courthouses to get accurate criminal and arrest record. Most of the cheapo background check sites will be highly inaccurate. You should check his liens, debts, and lawsuits against him as well. Real reputable. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: R_Lem on July 28, 2014, 09:21:28 PM I do have a question for you Gleb. Did you receive funds from Eric Corlew's bASIC-MINING mining address after he stopped communicating with his shareholders in August 2013. If so what was that 100 btc for?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:22:16 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) Be careful driving through Oregon, IL. The police there have a bad habit of arresting dead people: http://www.oglecountylife.com/view_xml_entity.php?id=Ar00400&date=12-10-2012-4&bodyInfo=false&entity=article&toc_id=275 Quote At 6:14 p.m., Oregon Police arrested Bruno Kucinskas, age 52, of Sandwich, IL, for driving while license suspended. Kucinskas was also issued citations for operating an uninsured motor vehicle and for operation of a vehicle that is overweight on registration. Kucinskas was transported to the Ogle County jail. I honestly didn't know my IL DL was suspended and the insurance just lapsed. I may, or may not, knew I was overweight, but seriously didn't think DOT laws applied to wood in a pickup truck. I now know better and drive around Oregon when I'm overweight. ;D You have 0 criminal records returned... you just got my service for free lol You will need to check the court records websites and go to the specific courthouses to get accurate criminal and arrest record. Most of the cheapo background check sites will be highly inaccurate. You should check his liens, debts, and lawsuits against him as well. Real reputable. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=714713 (call the cops, for there's an unstable Bitcoiner among us) Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 09:22:38 PM ... You should check his liens, debts, and lawsuits against him as well. Real reputable. So Newfriend, it sounds like you are daring me to report the bros? Am i reading you right? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:25:30 PM I do have a question for you Gleb. Did you receive funds from Eric Corlew's bASIC-MINING mining address after he stopped communicating with his shareholders in August 2013. If so what was that 100 btc for? I sold him two Avalons. I also helped behind the scenes providing information to those affected by him that was not readily available elsewhere. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 09:26:56 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there.
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:28:54 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. You fucked up now! Soon, everybody will know you're the captain of the Escapde: http://maritimematters.com/2014/07/an-escapade-left-high-and-dry/ Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:31:39 PM A records check confirmed the info On Glebs I.D. http://s21.postimg.org/lluzwpsr7/Capture.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/lluzwpsr7/) It ain't confirmed till Benny and Branny's uncle who's a PO down in Florida confirms it. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 28, 2014, 09:31:54 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. You fucked up now! Soon, everybody will know you're the captain of the Escapde: http://maritimematters.com/2014/07/an-escapade-left-high-and-dry/ Please don't tell them I left the boat... I don't think they noticed Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 09:34:09 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. You fucked up now! Soon, everybody will know you're the captain of the Escapde: http://maritimematters.com/2014/07/an-escapade-left-high-and-dry/ Please don't tell them I left the boat... I don't think they noticed It's you're call, meanwhile I'm goin' be outta pocket for a few minutes while I go and pay my insurance which is already one day late and I'm on an SR22 for 3 years. Hold the fort down during my absence, bud. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 09:35:08 PM ... You should check his liens, debts, and lawsuits against him as well. Real reputable. So Newfriend, it sounds like you are daring me to report the bros? Am i reading you right? ??? Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: R_Lem on July 28, 2014, 09:59:43 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. Don't forget to mention your fine contribution to the world. http://www.riverboatbitcoin.com/ Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 28, 2014, 10:11:35 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. Don't forget to mention your fine contribution to the world. http://www.riverboatbitcoin.com/ R_Lem, what's up with this ttly srs bznz IPO? What's the holdup? I had all muh coin ready... http://s29.postimg.org/by08xjzcn/szabo.jpg Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 28, 2014, 11:14:59 PM Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there. Don't forget to mention your fine contribution to the world. http://www.riverboatbitcoin.com/ R_Lem, what's up with this ttly srs bznz IPO? What's the holdup? I had all muh coin ready... http://s29.postimg.org/by08xjzcn/szabo.jpg http://24.media.tumblr.com/a308bc21203b14eb807da31023600561/tumblr_mv21lyRWPK1sl9baeo1_400.gif Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: ensurance982 on July 29, 2014, 03:38:00 PM What's going on here? This is the most bizarre IPO thread I've ever seen! What about all those memes around here??? I guess I should just go ahead and invest a few BTC in this...
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: NotLambchop on July 29, 2014, 03:43:47 PM ^You totally should bro, d00d's 100% legit.
Get your coin ready and keep pounding F5, or you'll miss this exciting financial opportunity. I might pick up a few shares myself, for reasons... ~Happy Investing! Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 29, 2014, 03:52:58 PM What's going on here? This is the most bizarre IPO thread I've ever seen! What about all those memes around here??? I guess I should just go ahead and invest a few BTC in this... https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS4Fdhuf4DsDq5r_Ho0xb5QdUHorrhaaIcCNYB9_CFuk_oRRSxcDA Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Jayson6969 on July 29, 2014, 05:17:02 PM BUMP ;D
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 29, 2014, 10:57:23 PM Just wanted to throw this out since I know good old benny will delete it
When did they win that auction? Cause the property is still listed on loopnet http://www.loopnet.com/Listing/18254303/2150-N-COURT-ST-Circleville-OH I am going to call the listing agent as well, glad I have a membership to loopnet :) http://www.ohiorealestateauctions.com/property_details/2150_n_court_st_circleville_ohio_43113_previous_hardware_store_building_with_over_68_000_sqft_and_3_acres_568 June 12th was the auction date? That puts it at almost 60 days out. The reserve on this property is $318,000.00 with a 10% buyer’s premium and a non-refundable 10% of the total purchase price deposit required of the winning bidder. The winning bidder will close the transaction with FirstAmerican Title Company within 30 days of the live event. http://s12.postimg.org/ttvqhtc21/prop.jpg (http://postimg.org/image/ttvqhtc21/) Whats the status of the 0.04c/kwh and 68k sq ft building? How does a successful IPO affect the timetable or progress of this lease? What happens to the old HVAC and electric equipment after you move the operation? Last time you built a mining facility the construction seemed to take couple weeks too long cutting into profits. Will this time be better? 1. We're in negotiations for purchasing it. We've already won the auction and placed a down payment on the building. I will be approaching a few lenders next week about finishing financing on the building. If all goes well, we will have the deed to the building before we request a single BTC from Havelock. I would note that the reason we are seeking to buy it is because we can lease out a portion of the building (which will be far too large for mining/distribution) and fully offset any leasing expenses that we would face at the facility. The end goal is to have the company pay for no mortgage, no lease, and very few upgrades at the building - hopefully allowing for easier balance sheets that simply focus on mining revenue, hardware sales, and basic COGs/Overhead expenses. 2. It would help ensure that we can close the deal if any additional capital was/is needed for facility acquisition. As-is, the building is usable for retail/distribution, but not for larger scale mining. The facility is equipped with, at a minimum, 800a/208v service, but we need to continue investigation of the current capacity to see what maximum deployment is when we move in. 3. We will likely cut out the current HVAC equipment to be moved to the new facility. Furthermore, the facility is already equipped with a large number of air handlers/compressors. It was a former hardware sale company (think Lowes, but a mom & pop building). Regrettably, we could have purchased dozens of HVAC units at a fraction of retail when they liquidated the assets of the company. But there is still a reasonable amount of hardware available for utilization upon move-in. 4. We continued to pay out dividends regardless of where the facility was. Since our pivot involves a more retail-centric offering, we can put money into hardware resales, while ensuring that the HVAC/electric is done in a proper way. Once that is done, we'll leverage liquid capital from hardware sales to move into mining. Even then, I believe that we can broker a deal with companies like ZeusMiner that are willing to sell (or even give) you hardware if you're willing to split coin generation with them. This could be a scenario where the investor pays only for HVAC/electric installation, while we leverage said deal and merely pay for electricity - offsetting any hardware costs that the investor could occur while waiting (and losing) potential mining profits. I own a APT complex and I know for a damn fact when they say 30 days to close.. that it or they take your deposit and reauction the property. Not sure about OHIO laws but I know most real estate laws are pretty close, and it is illegal for them to change terms after the auction. It gives a bidder a unfair advantage. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 30, 2014, 07:43:54 PM Benjamin Schlichter of Circleville, OHIO, has opted to delete my posts (40+ and counting), among others, from his HASH (not drugs) thread, probably because he doesn't want his brothers and sisters at his church see his gambling and porn connections due to he and his brother, Brandon Schlichter, ministering to their children in the basement of their church.
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote Looks like Brothers Schlick have been eyeballin' this 68,000 sq ft/3+ acres facility, shrunk down from 70,000 sq ft/4+ acres. https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg88160#msg88160 http://s29.postimg.org/eu9uusolj/Brothers_Schlick.jpg https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg88481#msg88481 http://s3.postimg.org/6aoi1nb43/Brothers_Schlick_3.jpg https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg88443#msg88443 http://s21.postimg.org/hhkxnp4fb/Brothers_Schlick_2.jpg Sadly, MrStickBall opts to play HardBall. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 30, 2014, 09:40:24 PM And the hits keep on a comin'!
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Quote https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126.msg162342#msg162342 Quote We're trying to negotiate the boat (no, literally). There are a few lakes around the county we could take shareholders to for leisure trips as needed (assuming the boat works - I don't believe I've been on a boat before). @Happy - My brother runs RentalStarter, and has a maintenance/construction crew that can be utilized for any repairs or rehabilitation. Because of this, we can leverage a work-for-rent schema that would allow us to mark down any repair or renovation costs significantly, and keep all such things in-house. Will we need to dedicate funds to the building to get it up-to-date? Absolutely. But if we mortgage the property, we could easily be in a situation where we may have to divert less than $150,000 USD from IPO funds to cover purchase + rehabilitation (then tack on the ~$4000/mo fee for mortgage/taxes/insurance). $4,000/mo we can swing even with the current slump. Due to my brother being a Real Estate agent, we've discussed ways of "Tying up" the building in legal contracts that would give us 90+ days to find a lender and mortgage the property. If we went that route, we'd have plenty of time to get true costs evaluated before making the dive. http://s21.postimg.org/hhkxnp4fb/Brothers_Schlick_2.jpg April 24, 2014: Benny speaks about the purchase of the 68,000 sq ft facility and how his Twinie will lease part of the it. January 03, 2014: Branny (Brandon Schlichter) talks about some unknown already interested in leasing the same exact facility that his Twinie is looking into purchasing. June 12, 2014: The 68,000 sq ft facility in question is sold at auction supposedly to Benjamin Schlichter. And I, among others, are the motherfuckin' assholes for bringing this truism to light, with Brothers Schlick's cocksuckin' buddies givin' us negative trust for our efforts. These fuckers don't have a motherfuckin' clue that they're only one phone call away from no longer ministering to youths in the basement of their Holy-rollin' Pentecostal church. At the moment, I'm one pissed-off Bitcoiner. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: aa on July 31, 2014, 02:18:51 AM Wow, are you guys getting paid to write the dumb shit posted in this thread, or do you actually have so little going on in your lives that you sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerk with each other?
Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 31, 2014, 02:31:21 AM Wow, are you guys getting paid to write the dumb shit posted in this thread, or do you actually have so little going on in your lives that you sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerk with each other? Honestly, we're seeking to IPO so that we CAN get paid to sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerkville with one another. Until then, we do this shit for free to better your Bitcoin position. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: RiverBoatBTC on July 31, 2014, 02:50:01 AM Wow, are you guys getting paid to write the dumb shit posted in this thread, or do you actually have so little going on in your lives that you sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerk with each other? Honestly, we're seeking to IPO so that we CAN get paid to sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerkville with one another. Until then, we do this shit for free to better your Bitcoin position. That is correct and our the CircleJ IPO will be looking for funds in the amount of 1 Million Bitcoins. This is all the information we will release as it is a double super black opps IPO. The return will be 75% per month we have a contract to purchase a large parcel of land in a undisclosed location to start training future members. Please PM me and I will give you the address to send you bitcoins to. Title: Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL Post by: Gleb Gamow on July 31, 2014, 03:44:48 AM Wow, are you guys getting paid to write the dumb shit posted in this thread, or do you actually have so little going on in your lives that you sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerk with each other? Honestly, we're seeking to IPO so that we CAN get paid to sit on Bitcointalk all day and circlejerkville with one another. Until then, we do this shit for free to better your Bitcoin position. That is correct and our the CircleJ IPO will be looking for funds in the amount of 1 Million Bitcoins. This is all the information we will release as it is a double super black opps IPO. The return will be 75% per month we have a contract to purchase a large parcel of land in a undisclosed location to start training future members. Please PM me and I will give you the address to send you bitcoins to. Now that the coins outta the bag, we must as well show all our logo that we may, or may not, be using sans permission. http://www.trailer-world.com/userfiles/image/circle-j.jpg |
