You also erased all the messages and questions. Such a transparent project.
Yes, the whole conversion with you have been deleted, because of your dirty words. We don't have a PR, but it does mean we allow you to shit talk a project where many people put efforts on. Edit: you were asking about transparent, and we've been answering your questions. All the spendings of the foundation/community funds are available. We don't think the founders fund is subject to this release, like we're not restricting on your airdorp coins. As stated on Discord just before the ban and I guess that's why you banned : there is no informations about this private sale in this document. If this question leads to a ban, you should learn about stress management and transparency : working on a project shouldn't allow you to act like this, or to misslead people. And if you think people who buy your project and support it on exchange aren't contributing or working hard, then I ask you where their money come form ? Do you think they have magic garden ? They deserve answers, not straight ban for asking embarassing questions. Period. We never meant to mislead the public, but all you've been doing is ignoring the documents/information we released, either on the official website or on ANN, and keeps attacking the devs personally. I don't have much time arguing with or explaining to you, but you decide whether it's good to go or stay. Point me where the private sale information is please, I don't find it, anywhere. And no, you banned, so you arbitrary decided. And I didn't see any personal attack, only legitimate question about a shaddy private sale conducted under the table. Retails buyers should know about that. You don't have time, you'll take the time, because I'm not leaving. Even if the question are harsch, you shouldn't censor. |
|
|
|
You also erased all the messages and questions. Such a transparent project.
Yes, the whole conversion with you have been deleted, because of your dirty words. We don't have a PR, but it does mean we allow you to shit talk a project where many people put efforts on. Edit: you were asking about transparent, and we've been answering your questions. All the spendings of the foundation/community funds are available. We don't think the founders fund is subject to this release, like we're not restricting on your airdorp coins. As stated on Discord just before the ban and I guess that's why you banned : there is no informations about this private sale nor it's price and since that could lead the retail market to be dumped on it should be in this document. If this question leads to a ban, you should learn about stress management and transparency : working on a project shouldn't allow you to act like this, or to misslead people. And if you think people who buy your project and support it on exchange aren't contributing or working hard, then I ask you where do you think their money come form ? They push your valuation up and well, do you think they have magic garden to grow bills of 500 ? They deserve answers, not straight ban for asking embarassing questions. Period. |
|
|
|
|
You also erased all the messages and questions. Such a transparent project.
|
|
|
|
This is a scam. They conducted a serie of private sale and never communicated this to the public. It's nowhere on the documents they share and nowhere to see since they pretend to be a no ICO coin. They accidentely said they had huge investors and when I asked questions due to their missleading communication, I got banned from their Discord after the team stated that since I didn't contribute (which is wrong) I have no right to talk (which is idiot). Any buyer now wouldn't be able to know exactly the conditions of the sales conducted in a shaddy way that even the shittiest ICO's in the space can't stand. Any buyer now can be dumped on by some private (selected?) investors who bought 4 times cheaper. This is more than a red flag, this is an inmportant exemple of why we need good regulation ; these deals under the table can kill any momenum. There are many exemple of VC's hurting projects by dumping on retail investors while they bought ten times cheaper, and here it's even more ridiculous since Semux team communication is based on the non ICO's strenght. They misslead. You can be dumped on anytime, not only because someone bought cheaper, but because big deals happened under the table, and if you ask questions about this issue, which is clearly an issue, they will ban you straight.
There are many competitors around. Semux is killing itself with such missleading communication and scammy execution.
I second that. This was a terrible way to answer a legitimate concern. I saw the talk and I saw the ban. The question were harsch, agressive, but legit. The censure and lack of clear answer in addition to the contemptuous attitude from the main founder is shitty. Too bad, they seemed to have a good work first aproach. Unfortunately as you said, many competitors with better tech, more transparency and less ego. Very nice to see spammers use newbie accounts to FUD! We're very transparent with how the coins are distributed and would stick to the original goals/roadmap. It won't take you 10 minutes to read the official website, https://www.semux.org/EDIT: The founders have the right of spending their shares, like any of us trades the coins we received from airdrop! I'm not a newbie account kid. And you're not answering the transparency issue and retail investors concerns. Instead you're trying to undermine the person who point a red flag and you yell FUD. I saw what happened, and your reaction is as shitty as the one you had on Discord. You answer concerns in a professonal manner, you don't ban people who have concerns. Grow yourself some balls. You're not the best tech around, don't be the shittiest person in town. Face concerns, don't silent / censure these. It's shit. |
|
|
|
This is a scam. They conducted a serie of private sale and never communicated this to the public. It's nowhere on the documents they share and nowhere to see since they pretend to be a no ICO coin. They accidentely said they had huge investors and when I asked questions due to their missleading communication, I got banned from their Discord after the team stated that since I didn't contribute (which is wrong) I have no right to talk (which is idiot). Any buyer now wouldn't be able to know exactly the conditions of the sales conducted in a shaddy way that even the shittiest ICO's in the space can't stand. Any buyer now can be dumped on by some private (selected?) investors who bought 4 times cheaper. This is more than a red flag, this is an inmportant exemple of why we need good regulation ; these deals under the table can kill any momenum. There are many exemple of VC's hurting projects by dumping on retail investors while they bought ten times cheaper, and here it's even more ridiculous since Semux team communication is based on the non ICO's strenght. They misslead. You can be dumped on anytime, not only because someone bought cheaper, but because big deals happened under the table, and if you ask questions about this issue, which is clearly an issue, they will ban you straight.
There are many competitors around. Semux is killing itself with such missleading communication and scammy execution.
I second that. This was a terrible way to answer a legitimate concern. I saw the talk and I saw the ban. The question were harsch, agressive, but legit. The censure and lack of clear answer in addition to the contemptuous attitude from the main founder is shitty. Too bad, they seemed to have a good work first aproach. Unfortunately as you said, many competitors with better tech, more transparency and less ego. |
|
|
|
|
Muh cristal ball says 10m
|
|
|
|
I have unfortunately no answer. But I'm starting a little experiment. I don't know if we will turn into a giant cristal ball or not but this isn't the part I'm interested in anyway. Actually, I'm wondering if the crowd, if the people, can be more accurate than Tone Vays and alikes, more accurate than all the self called specialists in the space. So I made a short survey and I hope to be able to collect a few hundreds and maybe a few thousands answers. Thanks in advance guys, it's only a few seconds of your time and it can be fun ! Here's the survey ! https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1v4qiO3I9Q7zvLijHBHyyZ60jlZbW-unl0ZzUTuwAdhkMany experts predict that the price of Bitcoin, many experts are right in predicting but not a few experts missed the prediction, this is due to the nature of interoperable Bitcoin prices which make the fluctuation of Bitcoin prices quite extreme. Can you explain further ? |
|
|
|
As I said many times, there is really no point making these ''predictions''. They aren't predictions, they are inventions. There is no analysis capable of giving accurate results when it comes to that time frame. At most with technical analysis you can make educated guesses short term. Fundamental analysis might allow you to make longer term predictions but they can't be very accurate.
As explained in the first post it's not about Bitcoin price, it's about specialists educated knowledge / guesses VS crowd knowledge / guesses. It's a probabilistic experiment and I personally don't really care about the BTC price. I'm bullish on it, but that's also irrelevant here. English isn't my first language so maybe it wasn't clear enough. Unfortunately when you look at the ''experts'' predictions, they never match, not even close. Some ceo of some company said bitcoin will reach 40k this year. Someone else actually said 65k, that's not a small difference. Point being is that even if the ''experts'' can't agree then what's the point of making these predictions? Of course being bullish on bitcoin is something else, you are not necessarily making an accurate prediction. The year isn't over and well, second, as stated, it's not about getting an accurate prediction about the price but an accurate prediction about the predictions  |
|
|
|
So I made a short survey and I hope to be able to collect a few hundreds and maybe a few thousands answers.
unless you sticky this on the front page of /r/bitcoin i don't see you getting more than a dozen answers. i hope i am wrong though. you can see a list of "predictions" here which actually was giving incentive (0.125 BTC) to the closest guess and it didn't get that many replies: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4710399.msg43025808#msg43025808(i waited for last minute to join but i missed the deadline  ) ps. make sure to share the result of your poll with us later on. Thank for the tip mate! |
|
|
|
As I said many times, there is really no point making these ''predictions''. They aren't predictions, they are inventions. There is no analysis capable of giving accurate results when it comes to that time frame. At most with technical analysis you can make educated guesses short term. Fundamental analysis might allow you to make longer term predictions but they can't be very accurate.
As explained in the first post it's not about Bitcoin price, it's about specialists educated knowledge / guesses VS crowd knowledge / guesses. It's a probabilistic experiment and I personally don't really care about the BTC price. I'm bullish on it, but that's also irrelevant here. English isn't my first language so maybe it wasn't clear enough. |
|
|
|
, it's only a few seconds of your time
 T_T |
|
|
|
I have unfortunately no answer. But I'm starting a little experiment. I don't know if we will turn into a giant cristal ball or not but this isn't the part I'm interested in anyway. Actually, I'm wondering if the crowd, if the people, can be more accurate than Tone Vays and alikes, more accurate than all the self called specialists in the space. So I made a short survey and I hope to be able to collect a few hundreds and maybe a few thousands answers. Thanks in advance guys, it's only a few seconds of your time and it can be fun ! Here's the survey ! https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1v4qiO3I9Q7zvLijHBHyyZ60jlZbW-unl0ZzUTuwAdhk |
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to predict the next validator and can an attacker see the validator IP's ? If so, he / she could easily DDOS the entire dPOS system in favor to his / her own validator(s).
|
|
|
|
KYC is a good move from exchanges if you ask me because it will give users protection from the spammers in our communinty,verification process should eliminate these bots from the greedy people.
It's irrelevant. |
|
|
|
Just bought another stack ! I can't wait to see the shared masternode service running  |
|
|
|
Congratulations guys. This looks great  Glad to see some projects with real use cases and real business plans among all the puppet and wafflecoins. |
|
|
|
|
CURVE never delivered anything and the two "devs" went full silent after a presale of 50BTC. They kept promising and underdelivering and everything make us believe this is just yet another soft scam but this time, it'll not happen. Not anymore. Those jokes dared to insta ban any one asking questions, they banned the investors, they even banned the mods when they went doubtful about them working for real. For months, they kept sharing stories and blehblehring without, never, giving us, investors and staff, any single tangible informations out of their infinite talkative bullshits. They affirmed they were incorporated, we asked for the name of the company, a registeration number, a lawyer. Nothing were given. They said they were working on a service, we asked for code, nothing. They barely delivered a whitepaper I could get on Upwork for 500 bucks and it's not even good enough to wipe asses with. It's a scam. Stay away from this. On my side, David, Marv, or whatever is your real ids, I'll see you to the court when I'll drag you for fraudulent presale and then, we'll see ;-)
|
|
|
|
Great to see more and more activity here. |
|
|
|
|
I just wish Cryptopia get its shine back.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
