Can you clarify something for me please? Was this loan repaid? Why I ask is there is no further correspondence between either of you in this thread and on their trust feedback page, your only comment is they have an outstanding loan which would now be close to three years overdue.  Your trust feedback: User Bitdonator's trust feedback: | | irfan_pak10 | | 2020-03-31 | | Reference | | Gived me a 10 day loan without collateral.
Thank you for your trust, it was a pleasure to work with you. |
2013-03-25, 23:52:40 Date Registered: Bitdonator
4/20/2019 12:28:13 AM woke up Bitdonator
2020-03-21, 00:45:46 - You facilitated their loan application.
2020-03-31 - Their trust feedback
2020-04-06 - Your trust feedback (or the loan of the 2020-03-21 which you referenced)
2021-03-19, 04:00:25 - 2nd Last actual post Bitdonator - seeking loans
9/30/2022 1:42:08 PM woke up Bitdonator
2022-10-01, 15:08:27 - Last actual post Bitdonator - seeking loans
2022-10-01, 16:21:20 Last Active: Bitdonator
Your trust feedback was *after* the loan was due (i.e. it was already overdue) and you facilitated the loan *without* collateral. BTC 0.0125 when converted is worth close to $300 at today's rate of exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Agreed and thanks for the clarification.
(Your second quote is of yourself, not me, but has been attributed to me).
|
|
|
|
SirAndre [ BPIP] was last online 90 minutes ago:  At some point in the past they have withdrawn their trust feedback against you. 
Both LegendaryDR [ BPIP] and DiorDior [ BPIP] woke up the same day. 10/23/2022 8:14:33 AM woke up DiorDior
10/23/2022 8:17:21 AM woke up LegendaryDR then went back to sleep. 2019-05-09, 23:45:36 Date Registered: LegendaryDR
2020-10-26, 03:19:39 Date Registered: DiorDior
2022-07-20, 21:49:22 Date Registered: SirAndre
2022-10-23, 18:19:21 Last Active: LegendaryDR
2022-12-18, 20:41:15 Last Active: DiorDior
According to this post https://ninjastic.space/post/55396817 and the corresponding Flag again LegendaryDR there is a third alt laminfofana [ BPIP] identified through their shared use of the telegram name Angeldomo. A quick search of the term Angeldomo revels three UID's use that term in the Korean section: Hello Koreans, I need a someone to carry out a little 15mins task for me, payment is $400 after you're done. MOST BE A FEMALE AND A STRAIGHT HAIR PLEASEADD ME ON TELEGRAM. https://t.me/AngeldomoHello Everyone, I need to exchange my btc worth more than $6000 with PayPal (clean source). PayPal can be pain with their rules sometimes, you must be ready to assist me if they put hold on the fund you send. We can do Forum escrow or Localbitcoin. My Localbitcoin is ~ https://localbitcoins.com/accounts/profile/LAMBRUSKIINNMin $10 Max $2000. My teregram https://t.me/Angeldomo.Scammers, you got to chill, cause I can't get scammed. Best regards! Need a Korean woman/girl to verify my Korean poloniex account. Payment of $1000 after verification is completed. Thanks. My telegram. https://t.me/Angeldomo
2016-05-22, 04:27:42 Date Registered: laminfofana
11/16/2018 12:23:46 PM password reset via email laminfofana
11/19/2018 9:13:04 AM password reset via email laminfofana
1/21/2019 5:10:50 PM password reset via email laminfofana
2020-05-16, 21:10:40 Date Registered: KoRanAe
10/19/2020 8:49:27 AM woke up laminfofana
5/13/2022 6:23:54 PM woke up laminfofana
2021-05-10, 18:34:41 Last Active: KoRanAe
2022-12-18, 20:40:46 Last Active: laminfofana laminfofana last active date matches that of DiorDior. Conclusion they are alts. |
|
|
|
We've had people here study screen shots in the past and verify they were fabricated - are any of them still around?
Since, you can technically edit the code displayed on the front end of your browser, i.e go into developer tools, and change the code; then it's not really easy to verify whether a screenshot has been faked or not. Since, you can just edit it via your browser, and not through photo editing software. You can only really tell when something has been edited via photo editing tools, not via changing the code directly, and then capturing it. However, I doubt that's what happened in this case. It does seem like Amph hasn't exactly denied they sent that message to Lucius. It does seem as though a conversation occurred. As to whether of not there was a man-in-the-middle who was coaxing information out of either or both, we may never know. (then again both users could have been set up knowing they would bounce off of each-other. The scenarios are endless. I've been harassed on Telegram by a forum member in the past, and I think you're actually onto something here. I don't doubt Lucius's claim that he didn't contact Amph on Telegram, and I don't doubt that Amph believes that he was contacted by Lucius. There are some real sick drama queens here who just want to stir shit up.
Agreed. See above.
Also i think it's time the forum take serious with the sending of unsolicited PMs on the forum by users, what @Lucius could have done is to reported such PM to he moderator at first when he received such invite.
The forum does, I'm not saying to not report unsolicited personal messages, but reporting a message in hopes to get it verified publicly isn't going to fit in with the moderation guidelines, and therefore wouldn't be done. Of course, Lucius could've reported the personal message for being unsolicited, and I do urge users to report unsolicited messages. Lucius probably did the right thing for their reputation announcing this to the public, and in fact seemed to be quite sensitive about providing the evidence of the personal message at first, since it's generally considered that personal messages are indeed that; personal. We don't know the intentions of the user on Telegram that was impersonating Lucius, or at the very least implying some sort of deception that they're Lucius. You do realise of course you're suggesting an admin or mod would be the one being unfaithful in breaching either users' privacy whilst reviewing their PM's ?? |
|
|
|
@Amph - I've only read the first half dozen posts and am wading my way through the rest, but take my advice - change your passwords both here and on any social media that's been mentioned thus far. Someone may have accessed your details and are shadowing you from within. (does that have a name? it seems nearly everything else around here does)
We've had people here study screen shots in the past and verify they were fabricated - are any of them still around?
There was a user Mavy [ BPIP] who woke up a while back then went back to sleep. Not saying they are alts, however, from the one piece of evidence, that was a part of the user name. 2013-06-29, 20:33:20 Date Registered: Mavy
12/16/2020 8:24:49 PM woke up Mavy
2020-12-17, 06:30:34 Last Active: Mavy
====================================================================
2013-04-14, 03:56:49 Date Registered: Amph
2023-02-24, 04:42:22 Last Active: Amph
Amph was last active four days ago.
Uhh... Forgive me to squeaking in with a rather confused tone, but why does it matter who sent what to who on the first place? I'm seriously asking here. I've tried to read the thread couple times and still couldn't see how it matters. The fact remains that Amph is willing to sell his account, as proven by his own evidence --self incrimination, that's rare. Why is it still matter if Lucius is indeed TGing Amph first or it was someone else pretending to be him? Agreed, this is very murky. If the PM is found to be genuine (and there is no indication that Amph's account has been hacked) then it is an admission of an attempt to sell their account. Both opponents have such high scores - Amph with the 4 th most posts and the OP with the 46 th most earned merits... Very unusual. |
|
|
|
Not 2021 wallets, no, not ever. No you moron, I never said 2021 wallets. Never said you did. If you had followed the thread, you'd know the OP was looking for wallets with activity prior to 2021. I assumed you had, my bad.
Buying as much as you can get, as long as they have uniswap activity before 2021!
Yes, I have read this thread. Did you not see the word *OLD*? - you even quoted it. Please stop Trolling me. |
|
|
|
Allow me to just park this here: Name :Jan Sterco
Vote
Btc add : 16Bc8sh3gTaypgRjpxBWn82RZ5H95XC41E
I wanna win
thanks
Best Regards PApundekli22
@mumi22
16Bc8sh3gTaypgRjpxBWn82RZ5H95XC41E
thanks a lot
16Bc8sh3gTaypgRjpxBWn82RZ5H95XC41E
thanks man
username:grindcomber
1DBatVGvWsfppHvpH7pCwRABUUFfihE3GJ
Thanks
Hii
Username : grindcomber
Thanks for all
Best Regards Papundekli22
Meanwhile back in 2016: Which is why I keep telling people they should always post something on a UID's trust feedback page, even if it's neutral. There's a whole lot more, but I'm still going back through their early posts... (and there's evidence @waterpile has many alts including the above) |
|
|
|
Not 2021 wallets
No you moron, I never said 2021 wallets. Please stop Trolling me. |
|
|
|
If OP found some smart way to capitalize on old addresses, good for him.
I've just seen this thread: old Bitcoin addresses as 'NFT' on the Bitcoin blockchain - 'signature chain' - I don't profess to follow it at all. However, now I'm wondering if the OP is going to be a pioneer of utilising the ETH wallets? Then again, it could just be a signature and alt farmer ready to sew their crops and offer ETH as well as staked BTC wallet addresses when peddling their wares.  |
|
|
|
I just spotted two more games in the USA Major League Rugby: New York ($1.17) Vs Toronto ($4.60) and the second game is San Diego ($1.80) Vs New England ($1.95) - I'm only betting a dollar, but am going for the favourites again.  6997 |
|
|
|
Paying $15 for wallets with uniswap transactions before 09-2020  I can't help but wonder if you are wanting to cash in on a fork that occurred around that time that most people are probably oblivious to? Not saying there actually was a fork, but I'm wondering. |
|
|
|
|
Are you buying? I have some of these any was wondering what you might offer for them?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello newbie with activity of just one.
Can you provide a photo of the coupon as proof you actually have it, please?
|
|
|
|
|
The bulk of mine are from 1995/1999 however in-spite posting details and photographs (plus answering PM questions and providing photos via PM) people want to be picky and pay peanuts.
I hope you have better luck than I did.
|
|
|
|
|
77 - Timelord2067
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
I've just come across two USA matches - Seattle ($1.40) over Atlanta ($2.80) and Houston ($1.14) over NOLA Gold ($5.20)
Already I've lost out on a couple of the New Zealand matches, hopefully I'll do better tomorrow.
Sometimes going with the favourite pays of. I've only just been able to place bets on the New Zealand Super Rugby Pacific games for round one.
To win, I'm going with: Crusaders over the Chiefs, Waratahs against the Brumbies, Fijian Drua to edge out Moana Pasifika, the Blues over the Highlanders in a close match, the Hurricanes will blow over the Reds, while the Western Force will outclass the Rebel Scum.
I think the Chiefs also won which would mean (including the two USA games and England and Ireland winning their respective games) I have eight from ten starts with France and Scotland to slug it out. |
|
|
|
Umm... I think you read the data wrongly.
I never said that user had only just begun trusting mr.relax, what I did say was right now those three are the only UID's who have merit of note who *right*now* DT trust mr.relax. Please don't try to put spin on something where there is none.
... And nice to see mr.relax now being distrusted by 5 new members. Agreed and point taken. Let the forum vote as they will. |
|
|
|
Update for week 215 shows mr.relax is now DT trusted by @Buchi-88 @MinoRaiola and @micaxel who may not be aware of this thread. https://loyce.club/trust/2023-02-25_Sat_05.07h/522205.html
As people seem to be willing to support a flag (even if they are hesitant to actually create one), I have taken the liberty of creating a flag against mr.relax Please support this flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3117anyone then wanting to escalate with a type 2 or type 3 Flag can do so as they wish. (At least newbies and guests will be made aware to exercise caution). |
|
|
|
|
I've just come across two USA matches - Seattle ($1.40) over Atlanta ($2.80) and Houston ($1.14) over NOLA Gold ($5.20)
Already I've lost out on a couple of the New Zealand matches, hopefully I'll do better tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
I've only just been able to place bets on the New Zealand Super Rugby Pacific games for round one.
To win, I'm going with: Crusaders over the Chiefs, Waratahs against the Brumbies, Fijian Drua to edge out Moana Pasifika, the Blues over the Highlanders in a close match, the Hurricanes will blow over the Reds, while the Western Force will outclass the Rebel Scum.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
