|
^^^ You're a massive sack of shit for claiming it's God that's being deceptive here.
|
|
|
|
|
No I was being sarcastic, I invested every cent I had in a pre-order back in 2013. BLACK ARROW named after the UK space/rocket program of the same name was selling miners named "Prospero" after the satellite they (UK) claimed to launch.
When it came time to deliver they (BA) told all their customers to fuck off and refused any refunds (except for the guy in China who lived close to the factory and brought the police with him, the employee who issued the refund was fired!).
There's a lot more to this story but I didn't make fuck all mining (no capital to buy hardware) and I lost thousands of dollars to this fucking scam. Scammers had 100% market penetration when I made my order, BFL, Hashfast, AMC, etc... all fucking scams. I was destined to get scammed on this no matter the timeline.
However, I figured out why they (BA) named their scam company after a space program and so here we are.
|
|
|
|
long time listener, 1st time caller  Does the "flat-earth" theory hold true to other planets / our moon / sun? According to notbatman, it's all holographic projections around the dome. I wonder why The Great Projectionist would want to make stars and planets appear to be round instead of disc shaped. Why bother with them at all if we're already the center of the universe? Seems like he (she/it) is going wildly out of their way to pull a fast one on us. Prankster God at it again. He never really explains what he means by projections or why they are there or who is making them or how does it work at all. They (the luminaries i.e. Sun, Moon, stars, planets, etc...) are 3-D holographic projections off of a concave mirror (the dome or firmament). Here's an example of a similar effect with a "magic mirror":   The old arcade game "time traveler" is perhaps a better example:   I can't say much about the source of the projections other that it's technology engineered by God. I suspect that ocean tides result from cooling the projector but that's just a guess; water could be pumped via magnetohydrodynamic pumping action as the salt makes sea water electrically conductive. I also suspect some of the projection hardware is manipulated via frictionless diamagnetics for levitation & motion of components. I can make all sorts of guesses about the how it works but due to its highly unfalsifiable nature, making any solid statements about it will need to wait until more facts come to light. |
|
|
|
|
@exemplaar,
They have to argue about off-topic and unfalsifiable subjects. If they have to answer why NASA is faking the globe, how ships go over a provably non-existant curve or why every scientific experiment ever conducted proves beyond a reasonable doubt the Earth is motionless then they're screwed.
|
|
|
|
^^^ can't go to hell if you don't have a soul. 
The farmer feeds me [other ground up cows] he would never lie to me. I'm also far too clever to be tricked, you're an idiot!
 |
|
|
|
^^^ That mythbusters video you linked doesn't debunk the clip of the flag waving that I posted, not even a little bit. That faggot is wrenching on the flag with a fucking metal lever! You realize anybody can click on your video and see what a massive clown you are? Your rebuttal (not an actual rebuttal but a shitty copy & paste) to M&M is equally as goofy; the goalposts are moved from an attempt at measuring the Earth's theorized motion to a non-sequitur regarding the aether. The box of soap who wrote that garbage then starts claiming it was a test of relativity when in fact relativity was the chosen's excuse for denying the empirical results of the experiment. Relativity was experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier's replication of the Sagnac experiment shortly after schlomo claimed there was no aether. The M&M experiment was replicated by the USAF in 1984 and confirmed that the Earth is stationary. Bonus video:  Video Revealing Mythbusters Lying About Curvature Suppressed | FLAT EARTH -- https://youtu.be/JX-s_ZubBmk |
|
|
|
|
This is a conspiracy by organized crime, violence is the only possible solution (by design).
|
|
|
|
|
Photographic evidence is the weakest and most easily fabricated kind of proof, not to mention all lenses are prone to distortion to some degree. Everybody screaming show me pictures is a moron or a fucking lampshade who doesn't want this issue resolved at any cost.
The truth is this issue was resolved in 1887 with the Michelson–Morley experiment, the Earth is motionless and can not be a spinning globe.
|
|
|
|
 The Apollo Moon landings are #FAKENEWS. |
|
|
|
^^^  |
|
|
|
^^^ I provided a photograph (halo), I provided physical evidence (meteorite), I provided proven physics (Coulom's Law), not to mention page 1 of the bible states in no uncertain terms that we're covered by a dome (firmament).
Scientific proof of "outer space": none. Scientific proof of "gravity": none. Scientific proof of "heavy balls in the sky": none. Scientific proof of "heliocentrism": none. Biblical proof of any of this crap: nope.
Fuck you and your lies!
Edit:
Oh, and about that ice wall just fucking type "Antarctic ice wall" into Google Images, you're so full of shit.
You provided no photos, there should be thousands and thousands of photos of the dome, considering it's everywhere, what about a mini rocket? Anyone could have sent a mini rocket to touch the dome, of course this never happens. Asking for the weakest and most easily fabricated form of evidence for the most unfalsifiable aspect of our planet, what a fucking schmuck you are. Despite the fact physical limitations such as the atmosphere and thousands of miles, I still managed post an image resulting from the presence of the dome two pages back in post #14533; you're a fucking liar. You're also a fucking idiot if you think a model rocket can ascend to an altitude of 3,000 miles. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not an argument to anything you quoted.
I provided a photograph (halo), I provided physical evidence (meteorite), I provided proven physics (Coulom's Law), not to mention page 1 of the bible states in no uncertain terms that we're covered by a dome (firmament).
Scientific proof of "outer space": none. Scientific proof of "gravity": none. Scientific proof of "heavy balls in the sky": none. Scientific proof of "heliocentrism": none. Biblical proof of any of this crap: nope.
Fuck you and your lies!
Edit:
Oh, and about that ice wall just fucking type "Antarctic ice wall" into Google Images, you're so full of shit.
|
|
|
|
Creating images of fake ball Earth is #2 on the list of things that pisses off God (10 commandments).
But not as much as liars who say the earth is flat, especially since there is nothing anywhere that can be shown to be flat: Revelation 22:15: For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. 
And when the thousand years are ended, Satan will be released from his prison and will come out to deceive the nations that are at the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them for battle; their number is like the sand of the sea. And they marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, but fire came down from heaven and consumed them, and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever. -- Revelation 20:7-10, ESVYour theological arguments are as full of shit as your pseudoscientific lies. The Earth is a stationary plain. |
|
|
|
|
Creating images of fake ball Earth is #2 on the list of things that pisses off God (10 commandments).
|
|
|
|
Move on, you mean like go out and enjoy all the money I made mining Bitcoin back in 2014?
AAAAAAAAAAAH IT'S FAKE, ALL OF IT !!!!111 YOU ARE JUST A PAID SHILL, I CAN TELL IT'S ALL FAKE THANKS TO MY 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN VIDEO EDITING AND PHOTOGRAPHY, I'M ALSO AN EXPERT IN PHYSICS, SCIENCE, ASTRONOMY AND EVERYTHING THANKS TO MY YOUTUBE VIDEOS. Awesome, I learned how to forge an katana sword and a roman temple starting with nothing but a sharped stick. https://streamable.com/s/l89dc/tgqyqb |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not an argument to anything you quoted there.
|
|
|
|
There will be no end to us arguing about whether the earth is round or flat because someone has their own opinions and thoughts. We should not debate things like this, because problems like this are only one solution, namely mutual respect for the opinions of other people.
The reading taken from a caliper for example is not a matter of opinion, so fuck off with your bullshit.
"... You are ignoring the point. The point is that the sun appears smaller from further away, not larger or the same. But the amount is far less than it would be if the dome were only the approximately 18,000 3,000 [FTFY] miles high at the center that you seem to think. ..."
No I'm not ignoring the point, I clearly defined the difference between apparent visual size and angular size in post #14537. "... Actually, so much for your claim. If you get atmospheric conditions just right, you can't see the sun at all... like at night. ..."
Day and night are not the result of atmospheric conditions. "... Star measurements are made from the center of the star, even if you can't lock in on it. If measuring off stars is assumptions, Sagnac, Michelson Morley, and Airy are assumptions, and flat earth fails because you have been placing your trust in them, even though you are backwards. ..."
1. You're completely ignoring refraction, the optical displacement caused is far too great by many orders of magnitude to be corrected by any minor adjustments. 2. None of the established experiments you listed made any assumptions and two of them don't even involve star light. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
.
