That's right folks, they can't refute the claim all observers see the same lunar face. All these clowns can do is dance around the subject, you know that dance that Jews do.

Mental acrobatics at its finest.



Here's video of them shutting it down. -- https://youtu.be/ubUooQ8wrwk

Currently all YouTube "Flat Earth" and "Moon Hoax" searches lead to nothing but globalist propaganda.

^^^ I provide documented video evidence that can be reproduced, something you faggots can't do.

You're the cunt liar with your NASA propaganda.

^^^ There, you've been provided with documented evidence that the earth's surface doesn't curve. Anybody with a super-zoom camera can reproduce this distance to the horizon test and fail the globe with a wide margin of error.

You're defending an incorrect assumption and I just proved it with documented evidence, faggot.

The stackechange article that led this question of assumptions doesn't even deal with the question of whether all observers see the same face of the moon or not. You guys are so full of shit you have to move the goal posts and can't deal with the question at hand. Not only that, even when you move the goal posts I still hand you your ass on silver platter with documented reproducible evidence.

Fuck off and die.

They make an assumption that the earth's surface curves, it does not. You've proven nothing then accuse me of lying? Proof doesn't rely on assumptions, go find a length of rope asshole...

On top of that the fags at stackexchange are describing the theoretical area two simultaneous observers can view a theoretical moon globe from a theoretical earth globe. It doesn't even deal with reality or the question at hand and has nothing to do with empirical observations motherfucker!

The globe fails a distance to the horizon test (no curvature), a reproducible test that can be performed with a super-zoom camera.

Simultaneous observers see the same lunar face (rotation and refraction not withstanding), a reproducible test that can also be performed with super-zoom cameras.

You're a gatekeeping cock smoker pushing fairy tales and theoretical fancy.

This is NASA astronaut and homosexual Scott Kelly aboard the ISS:



Video [NSFW]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqoqkg241EM

@Cryptotourist,

   "The lunar phase or phase of the Moon is the shape of the directly sunlit portion of the Moon" -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_phase

Different face, different shape, different phase; you lose.

NASA started this semantic pissing contest by changing 'face' to 'phase' so their propaganda agents could "work it", but they lose when a strict definition is used, as is the case when the scientific method is applied. The best part of their fail is confirmation, when all observers document the same lunar image (rotation and refraction not withstanding).

What they've attempted and failed to do is change their claims from what's observed i.e. the face, to what is theorized i.e. the sphere.

NASA is a deception and they're NOT A SPACE AGENCY but a propaganda agency, that's why it's NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER with them.

This classic NASA footage will help you understand the process better. | https://youtu.be/N-4BFfdGufo

@Cryptotourist if two observers see different moon faces then they're not observing the same phase, cocksucker.

Pack that into your pipe and smoke it.

inb4 NASA lies about everything. They do lie but, the fact everybody sees the same moon is so painfully obvious they won't touch it.

Losers.

^^^ One of us is tripping balls, guess who?

Some powerful mushrooms to get that much pupil dilation.



The globalists claim that the earth curves beyond 3 miles, 3 miles is (((coincidentally))) also the resolution limit of a 6' human eye. However, if you're high enough you can, with your greatly dilated pupil extend your visual limits thus seeing beyond the hypothetical curvature.

Magic mushroom in addition to stimulating critical thinking and altered perceptions allowing one to smell their bullshit, allows one to literally see past it.

^^^ All observers see the same face, you're wrong or you're lying.

What ever happened to pictures or it didn't happen? Check out the night sky with a super-zoom camera like the P1000!

Mars is a close small light source in the sky, if you think a rock is reflecting light back at you over 400 million miles then you were brainwashed by pedophiles as a child!

NASA is propaganda agency and outer space is fake and gay!

You're fucking delusional.

"characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder." -- Oxford entry on 'delusional'

^^^ Dude, you literally believe your ancestors were mutants who flew out of a monkey's ass.





The earth is an engineered structure with electric lighting.

You believe bullshit or you're a liar, the hypothetical observers in a LA and NY both see exactly the same lunar face all-be-it rotated due to the two observers differing perspectives. Everybody sees the same face no matter what their location on earth is.

@BADecker I can prove the moon is evenly lit, this is consistent with the moon being a projected holographic disc of plasma. It also debunks the idea the moon is a solid sphere reflecting sunlight.

Rainbows prove there's a concave mirror above us, they can't form without a reflective surface and the theory they're caused solely by the internal reflections of suspended water droplets can be debunked via experiment.

What do Astrophysicists have to say about this? They stick their fucking head in the sand and pretend it doesn't real:

   "The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist." -- Irwin Shapiro, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.

Seriously?

The atmosphere gets hazy at sea level, you can hardly see mountains in the distance. Looking up, the atmosphere thins out so you can see all the celestial objects.

Here's a picture look at the haze, you can't see through that shit beyond a few hundred miles:





Regarding the moon it's a sonoluminescent plasma disc on the surface of an upper atmospheric plane, the image you see is a holographic reflection of this illuminated disc, it reflects off of the dome's concave mirrored surface.

The moon's projected disc when measured is 32 minutes (32 nautical miles). Using plane trigonometry its distance is calculated to be about ~3,100 nautical miles. This calculation is the distance to the hologram, the plasma disc is a somewhat closer being below the concave mirror.

^^^ The atmosphere is a limiting factor, use your fucking brain.

A super-zoom camera (P900/P1000) has a different resolution limit than the human eye, so much so that it can debunk with a very wide margin of error the claim that the earth curves just beyond the human eye's resolution limit (~3 miles @ 6').

The resolution limit is based on physical aperture size.

The illustration shows how objects converge in the distance with an elevated single point perspective. The point in the centre is the vanishing point and the red line is your horizon line.

What's going on here is that the eye has a resolution limit, a maximum distance it can resolve objects. As an object moves away it gets optically compressed; smaller with distance. An object, while it gets compressed also moves towards the centre; to the vanishing point.

When the object reaches the horizon it has reached the vanishing point and can no longer be resolved; it's too small to see. The horizon is everything past the eye's resolution limit, everything is compressed into a line.

This is where it gets interesting because, if you know the resolution limit of the eye which is based on the aperture size and wavelength of light entering the eye and, you know the elevation of the eye above ground you can calculate the distance to the horizon.

This is the point where you bust out the sextant and start measuring the moon (32') against the horizon. 1 minute = 1 nautical mile.



The Who - I Can See For Miles -- https://youtu.be/Q0iqg2UanEc